## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.63312675 23.12.2025 03:11:32.151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
First image: 2461032.63312675 23.12.2025 03:11:32.151   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Last  image: 2461215.86951428 24.06.2026 08:51:56.034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 73
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  38230
Objects passed selection criteria:  38102
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 30724.2
Average stars matched: 28143.8 (91.6011 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   136812 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Jun 24 07:36:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR running VaST on the field Lac-01-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus?)

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Lac-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lac-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Lac-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 206946 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 206946 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.png' -> 'transient_report/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits_preview.png'

Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits


renamed 'Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.png' -> 'transient_report/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits_preview.png'

Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 700.2830
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 933.2646
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1055.6643
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 831.0916
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1056.0985
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 830.6460
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.50748
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-24T03:51:18.8985899' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-24T08:51:18.8985899' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61215.3689687271 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-24T08:51:28.8038537' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61215.3690833682 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     338.822851086044 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     54.0001165055308 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     57.8072222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     39.8183333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.18114526825904 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Lac-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '22 35 18'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               901.02 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             9.400752 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/d_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits :)

Spent 0.715081 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/d_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.2800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-24T03:51:56.0345954' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-24T08:51:56.0345954' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61215.3693985417 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-24T08:52:05.9367811' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61215.369513148 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     338.822851007775 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     54.0001164750513 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     57.8916666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =               39.745 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.18005434037123 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Lac-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '22 35 18'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20442 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.2800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.2800006866455 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 68.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               901.02 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            16.601328 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             9.400752 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/d_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits :)

Spent 0.790539 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/d_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits



fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461215.86908447
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:35:14.278 +53:59:17.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Image size: 936.8'x625.8'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:35:42.859 +53:56:05.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:35:14.278 +53:59:17.30
Second-epoch image center 22:35:42.859 +53:56:05.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0880 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 22:35:46.782 +53:56:20.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 22:35:14.278 +53:59:17.30
Second-epoch image center 22:35:46.782 +53:56:20.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0936 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  22:35:42.859 +53:56:05.36
Second-epoch second image center 22:35:46.782 +53:56:20.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01050 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JSpJ8Y7NPk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IhtWgz2yEE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FzqpHP6EVg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.atb5g6nQF0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits and wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41811 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 324.3066 to 354.2769 deg, Dec +47.7081 to +59.3675 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 324.3066 to 354.2769 deg, Dec 47.7081 to 59.3675 deg
Loaded 30274 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16944 out of 19459 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19459 out of 41811 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.957800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.957800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.13

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.13

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 41811 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 324.3066 to 354.2769 deg, Dec +47.7081 to +59.3675 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 324.3066 to 354.2769 deg, Dec 47.7081 to 59.3675 deg
Loaded 30274 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 16944 out of 19459 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 19459 out of 41811 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 41703 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 324.3062 to 354.2765 deg, Dec +47.7757 to +59.3760 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 324.3062 to 354.2765 deg, Dec 47.7757 to 59.3760 deg
Loaded 30120 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5327 out of 6096 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6096 out of 41703 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 65 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
 2.1 pix  Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
 15.1 mag.  Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.0 (SNR )  12.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JSpJ8Y7NPk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits' -> 'wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5547, bad_region=9383, passed=41811
Got 41811 stars (including 27871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.473 n_q1=248 n_q2=197 n_q3=280 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.979
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits -region wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IhtWgz2yEE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits' -> 'wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5546, bad_region=9398, passed=41703
Got 41703 stars (including 27777 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41703 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 678 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 605 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.20" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 599 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.83" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 734 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 680 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.81" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 677 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.83" 
Excluding outliers - 677 stars left (next iteration limit 658)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits N_match=677 sigma_overall_arcsec=4.965 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.650 sigma_q3_arcsec=9.622 sigma_q4_arcsec=20.100 n_q1=242 n_q2=203 n_q3=156 n_q4=76 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits -region wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FzqpHP6EVg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3986, bad_region=7401, passed=36813
Got 36813 stars (including 25954 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36813 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 747 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 658 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20115 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 747 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 725 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 688 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 685 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.81" 
Excluding outliers - 685 stars left (next iteration limit 693)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits N_match=685 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=4.113 sigma_q2_arcsec=4.860 sigma_q3_arcsec=15.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.357 n_q1=303 n_q2=205 n_q3=87 n_q4=90 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.886
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.atb5g6nQF0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4048, bad_region=7400, passed=36768
Got 36768 stars (including 25850 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.52" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 747 (Dec 48.1 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.51" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28585 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.12" 
Excluding outliers - 930 stars left (next iteration limit 917)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits N_match=930 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.044 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.124 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.818 sigma_q4_arcsec=2.077 n_q1=291 n_q2=203 n_q3=232 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.619
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits sigma_overall=0.488 worst_q_ratio=0.979
ref2=Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits sigma_overall=4.965 worst_q_ratio=4.049
new1=fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits sigma_overall=5.390 worst_q_ratio=2.886
new2=fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits sigma_overall=5.044 worst_q_ratio=0.619
reference average sigma_overall=2.7265 worst_q_ratio=2.514
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091_astrometric_residuals.png (677 matched stars from wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.22 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (685 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 2.53 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.83 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/wcs_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lac-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 22:36:21.18 +53:16:15.1:  11.87 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 22:36:21.18 +53:16:15.1:  13.12 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:36:21.18 +53:16:15.1: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8691 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 22:49:01.50 +55:10:51.5:  12.17 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 22:43:22.69 +55:41:54.9:  12.17 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 22:35:10.38 +55:28:45.6:  12.15 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 22:43:22.69 +55:41:54.9:  12.17 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 22:49:01.50 +55:10:51.5:  12.16 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:22.69 +55:41:54.9: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1495 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:49:01.50 +55:10:51.5: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1301 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 22:35:10.38 +55:28:45.6:  12.11 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:35:10.38 +55:28:45.6: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1290 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits at 22:09:04.71 +54:14:02.7:  12.15 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits at 22:09:04.71 +54:14:02.7:  13.54 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:09:04.71 +54:14:02.7: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1910 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51756_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 51756_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.22    22:22:45.32 +50:24:01.7   3525 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51760_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 51760_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.10    22:11:12.38 +52:58:59.9   2550 2720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51768_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 51768_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.90    23:05:27.07 +57:07:43.3   7232 5252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (284.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52508_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 52508_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    10.24    22:34:40.37 +54:02:15.6   4690 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54132_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 54132_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.37    22:27:52.70 +52:49:04.9   4065 2530   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55243_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 55243_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.68    22:40:45.73 +51:51:17.4   5249 1938   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55900_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 55900_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 24.36908    2461215.86908    11.86    22:36:20.74 +53:16:15.1   4839 2792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.88    22:36:21.63 +53:16:15.1   4839 2791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56345_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56345_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.93    22:22:20.67 +52:11:24.7   3540 2171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56365_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56365_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.95    22:37:07.17 +54:19:46.1   4907 3431   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56399_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56399_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.94    22:59:50.34 +55:59:22.1   6826 4518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (127.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56440_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56440_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.95    22:06:55.10 +54:33:12.6   2260 3704   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

**** FOUND  22:06:55.23 +54:33:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56514_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56514_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.03    22:45:21.84 +52:54:23.7   5659 2583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56559_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56559_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.01    22:47:23.30 +52:43:46.5   5848 2483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56571_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56571_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.01    22:37:02.62 +51:52:06.5   4902 1943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56758_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56758_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    11.98    22:37:10.04 +55:34:34.0   4909 4184   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56763_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56763_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.01    22:06:29.13 +51:10:55.2   2002 1673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56776_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56776_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.06    22:46:23.12 +49:55:44.7   5816 0782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56802_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56802_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.09    23:02:38.52 +53:49:04.3   7185 3228   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56913_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56913_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.09    22:48:37.84 +56:20:02.9   5869 4665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56949_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56949_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.06    22:33:32.79 +56:38:48.1   4607 4834   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56966_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56966_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.14    22:47:41.19 +51:26:01.9   5906 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56988_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 56988_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.17    23:04:45.92 +55:48:26.7   7255 4447   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57018_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57018_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.11    22:43:55.15 +54:01:27.2   5510 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57064_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57064_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.15    23:01:16.43 +53:32:17.2   7077 3049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57111_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57111_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.17    23:04:28.83 +52:07:45.2   7451 2225   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57151_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57151_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.09    22:32:01.23 +56:24:23.3   4478 4690   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57169_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57169_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.16    22:47:30.27 +54:46:14.8   5811 3716   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57189_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57189_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.13    22:43:26.68 +54:12:00.0   5465 3360   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57204_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57204_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.16    22:50:32.54 +52:03:12.5   6157 2086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57255_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57255_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 24.36908    2461215.86908    12.15    22:49:01.19 +55:10:48.6   5933 3971   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.11    22:49:01.80 +55:10:54.3   5933 3970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57263_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57263_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.10    22:09:04.00 +54:13:31.4   2429 3487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

**** FOUND  22:09:03.71 +54:13:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57275_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57275_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.16    22:30:34.05 +52:03:07.0   4300 2060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57283_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57283_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.11    22:44:32.11 +53:34:38.2   5572 2986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57301_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57301_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.14    22:37:59.92 +54:33:46.5   4983 3572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57303_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57303_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.20    22:44:45.86 +53:40:11.6   5591 3043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57318_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57318_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 24.36908    2461215.86908    12.15    22:43:22.97 +55:41:51.9   5437 4267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.15    22:43:22.41 +55:41:57.8   5437 4266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57328_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57328_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.15    22:47:51.23 +54:17:30.7   5853 3428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57348_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57348_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.12    22:35:18.64 +50:20:46.8   4736 1021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57360_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57360_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 24.36908    2461215.86908    12.15    22:35:10.42 +55:28:42.9   4738 4127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.11    22:35:10.34 +55:28:48.2   4738 4126   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57362_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57362_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.28    23:01:14.66 +52:47:04.3   7115 2593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57370_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57370_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.19    22:50:46.31 +54:34:49.1   6101 3614   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57373_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57373_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.20    22:48:48.48 +54:28:26.9   5932 3541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57404_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57404_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.21    22:50:48.99 +53:45:34.7   6130 3118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57415_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57415_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.15    22:19:36.11 +51:52:15.7   3274 1991   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57442_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57442_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.12    22:35:48.99 +56:40:01.3   4796 4845   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (149.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57445_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57445_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.25    22:48:04.05 +54:49:35.9   5859 3752   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57452_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57452_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.18    22:52:00.84 +56:18:14.6   6154 4661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (125.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57485_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57485_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.24    23:02:53.12 +57:01:29.8   7027 5168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (253.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57506_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57506_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.23    22:57:35.97 +54:41:01.0   6695 3714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57508_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57508_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.25    22:43:38.36 +53:34:48.0   5492 2986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57526_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57526_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.22    22:51:23.86 +54:05:32.3   6172 3322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57547_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57547_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.22    22:50:46.92 +51:05:18.0   6209 1503   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57612_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57612_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.25    22:36:52.30 +56:53:37.8   4883 4982   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (198.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57645_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57645_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.21    22:34:20.41 +54:19:25.7   4662 3428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57685_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57685_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.20    22:40:39.40 +53:09:48.5   5228 2729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57688_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57688_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.16    22:30:58.53 +55:21:16.1   4378 4055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57734_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57734_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.26    22:48:31.80 +55:44:48.4   5875 4309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57766_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57766_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.25    22:39:51.35 +53:53:07.8   5150 3164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57782_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57782_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.28    22:39:07.20 +53:11:40.7   5089 2746   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57810_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57810_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.23    22:20:37.78 +55:42:59.9   3501 4309   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57815_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57815_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.31    22:31:01.73 +54:14:33.4   4369 3383   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57886_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 57886_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.20    22:25:22.55 +57:15:55.4   3942 5227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (263.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58032_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 58032_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 24.36908    2461215.86908    12.22    22:09:04.36 +54:14:03.3   2431 3493   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    12.16    22:09:05.06 +54:14:02.2   2431 3492   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26290_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 26290_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    10.88    22:27:30.26 +52:16:38.4   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13396_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163
The candidate 13396_fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 24.36951    2461215.86951    10.78    22:11:11.23 +55:16:54.8   2673 4107   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lac-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
  
Last  image: 2461215.86908447 24.06.2026 08:51:18.898 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Lac-01-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt)
____ VaST output ____

--==VaST 1.0rc90==--

Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees!
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 4.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images

Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks

Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB)...  OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!

 VaST was started with the following command line: 
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits 


Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...


######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 4.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits catalog from cache
The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24.
Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-12-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0091.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 3 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
The above guess is basex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1sed on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user

autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.7,4.7,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits


Done with SExtractor!

TIMING SExtractor: 413 seconds


Matching stars between images!

No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2025-12-23T03:11:32.1512436
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2025-12-23T03:11:32.1512436

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2025-12-23T03:11:32.151
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_21-11-32_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0090.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 23.12.2025 03:11:32.151 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461032.63312675 mid. exp.
The reference image star  8040.201     1.159 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8436.771     1.176 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8515.101     1.214 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8599.963     1.395 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8068.818     2.670 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  7647.064     1.478 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  7694.960     1.563 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  7742.672     1.593 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8324.146     2.057 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8808.636     1.303 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 255371, (255371 good for image matching)
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 64
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 50141
 * rejected close to frame edge: 875
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 7
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.

Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.50
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.5  (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.8
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -8.1
Selected detection limit= -8.1
Final detection limit= -8.1 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)

Parameter box for transient search:    10.04.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 11
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    256574 * detected, using  502/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013708, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3517 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013727, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3522 
234651 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013723, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3521 
234651 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.013723, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3521 
234651 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] =  -0.000
    256574 stars detected, 234651 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 175002, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 175002 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 174998 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix +0.00032
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 169989 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.50
    277294 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory:  304748 kB used, 340676 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 511945 (511945 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-24T08:51:18.8985899
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-24T08:51:18.8985899

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-06-24T08:51:18.898
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-18_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0162.fits
The star  8649.411     1.257 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8488.461     1.315 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8877.269     1.387 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9121.178     1.916 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9454.066     1.416 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8287.569     3.522 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8423.590     5.611 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7670.886     1.255 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7689.589     1.414 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8639.499     2.068 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
READING SEXTRACTOR CAT: 80979  2535.048 1900.903  (0.747000)  s=3 v=     0
READING SEXTRACTOR CAT: 81082  2532.270 1903.079  (0.915000)  s=2 v=     0
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 237042
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 51
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 34706
 * rejected close to frame edge: 783
 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 10
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    237042 * detected, using  464/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.007966, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2209 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.007981, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2213 
176381 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.007981, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2213 
176381 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.007981, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2213 
176381 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = -175.686
    237042 stars detected, 176381 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 124523, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 124523 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 124512 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = -0.00001*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix +0.03591
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 86155 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.40
    337955 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
The transient candidate (new frame position  1991.024  2950.537 ; ref frame position:  7497.100  3674.832) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  4253.710   889.354 ; ref frame position:  5096.235  5551.732) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  1969.770  2676.374 ; ref frame position:  7497.655  3948.669) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  5565.520  3095.192 ; ref frame position:  3959.185  3262.887) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  6085.328   877.419 ; ref frame position:  3276.912  5426.102) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  3222.036   939.408 ; ref frame position:  6124.232  5579.467) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  5806.950  5206.784 ; ref frame position:  3877.743  1147.971) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  1944.393  2330.127 ; ref frame position:  7496.901  4294.394) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
memory:  1957072 kB used, 2221768 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 748987 (237042 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-24T08:51:56.0345954
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-24T08:51:56.0345954

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-06-24T08:51:56.034
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_035643_TTUQ2b1x1_3330910_bia9waGB/fd_Lac-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-24_03-51-56_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0163.fits
The star  8877.199     1.312 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9120.757     1.088 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7671.764     1.313 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7760.372     2.629 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8109.836     4.795 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7690.053     1.304 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7918.715     2.052 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8638.267     1.929 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9164.823     1.926 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9393.864     1.560 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
READING SEXTRACTOR CAT: 81327  2535.477 1899.924  (0.679000)  s=2 v=     0
READING SEXTRACTOR CAT: 81410  2532.676 1902.004  (0.930000)  s=2 v=     0
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 237738
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 43
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 34784
 * rejected close to frame edge: 767
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 13
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    237738 * detected, using  465/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.006451, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2180 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.006409, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2166 
227511 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.006415, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2168 
227511 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.006415, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2168 
227511 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = -175.688
    237738 stars detected, 227511 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 124700, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 124700 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 124685 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = -0.00001*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix +0.03380
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 91082 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.38
    348182 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory:  2004940 kB used, 2221768 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 986725 (237738 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 57 seconds
Done with measurements! =)

Total number of measurements 986725 (0 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory...  munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer
_____________________
########### Completed Lac-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461215.86908447 -observatory V36
07:46:15.91 +20:23:44.2 Mercury (1.2mag)
09:01:10.17 +18:58:38.1 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:36:56.08 +18:59:21.2 Mars (1.3mag)
08:02:20.58 +20:54:19.2 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:53:20.15 +03:09:22.0 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:03:55.74 +20:35:59.6 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:50.49 +00:20:25.3 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:16.53 -23:11:03.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
13:44:49.66 -16:15:48.1 Moon (-11.1mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 24 07:36 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461215.86908447:
08:02:26.76 +20:54:00.3 Io (6.2mag)
08:02:19.52 +20:54:22.0 Europa (6.3mag)
08:02:20.52 +20:54:24.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:02:44.19 +20:52:58.1 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:01:41.37 +20:33:10.7 Himalia (15.6mag)
08:02:25.22 +20:54:03.6 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:01:15.53 +20:42:12.2 Elara (17.6mag)
08:05:17.18 +20:57:10.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:08:09.90 +20:57:27.3 Carme (18.9mag)
00:53:10.59 +03:09:15.7 Titan (8.6mag)
00:53:25.33 +03:09:16.1 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:53:24.36 +03:11:22.3 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:53:08.62 +03:09:40.8 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:53:41.97 +03:08:56.9 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 24 07:36 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461215.86908447:
17:30:28.61 -35:16:46.6 JWST
15:55:13.01 +50:34:02.1 Chandra
01:35:58.32 +63:59:39.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 24 07:36 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461215.86908447 -observatory V36
18:31:00.60 -33:41:48.2 13.7mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:09:36.08 -67:59:53.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:55:02.78 +32:11:36.5 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:08:24.79 +15:55:36.3 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:51:40.04 -27:49:40.5 15.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:07:33.29 +32:05:48.4 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:53:40.18 +27:00:33.0 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:42:05.95 +30:27:59.6 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:59:45.95 +04:34:57.9 17.8mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:17:29.64 +21:40:36.7 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:14:25.22 -11:06:51.2 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:05:18.63 +67:20:34.8 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:06:21.99 -08:22:07.4 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:19:14.86 +79:09:42.0 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:34:20.06 +64:56:00.9 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:11:00.18 +29:04:42.9 14.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:25:32.22 +14:40:39.1 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:59:34.29 +35:41:34.5 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
22:01:15.62 +43:20:38.5 18.0mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
04:34:09.30 -14:41:58.2 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:20:44.39 +31:44:06.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:17.79 +51:45:12.0 18.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
07:01:40.39 -11:42:29.9 15.5mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:38:52.63 +23:00:09.5 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:44.92 +04:28:06.0 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:38:03.43 +77:56:08.6 17.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:26:16.21 +44:26:34.4 16.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:16:45.31 +01:07:22.3 16.7mag A/2026 E1
20:52:23.94 -10:41:03.1 7.9mag 10P/Tempel
11:06:50.09 -01:19:02.9 16.1mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:36:30.07 +27:42:38.9 17.8mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:34:25.02 +18:59:34.4 17.0mag 63P/Wild
00:39:22.51 -05:31:06.4 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:35:59.21 +34:25:22.0 17.4mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:48:29.82 +19:00:22.4 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:53:53.75 +08:03:39.4 15.9mag 88P/Howell
05:46:20.61 +30:57:17.1 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:30:34.85 +29:51:01.5 17.2mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:29:36.90 +32:09:38.8 15.4mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:18:50.81 +07:47:17.2 16.7mag 124P/Mrkos
04:25:42.09 +20:11:13.7 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
05:05:29.70 +19:36:48.0 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
07:02:15.69 +16:15:27.2 16.7mag 141P/Machholz
07:06:17.33 +17:45:54.4 16.6mag 141P-A/Machholz
06:11:12.19 +17:25:29.3 13.5mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:08:23.59 -22:40:28.8 16.2mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:36:19.88 +29:38:48.0 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:29:29.87 +07:15:43.5 15.9mag 169P/NEAT
01:01:05.71 +05:22:33.7 17.7mag 220P/McNaught
16:41:27.20 -08:04:27.1 16.7mag 235P/LINEAR
08:10:47.38 +34:35:22.2 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
20:43:17.74 -45:30:24.5 18.0mag 259P/Garradd
01:15:23.25 +04:40:27.7 16.0mag 260P/McNaught
04:49:43.07 +35:04:33.9 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
15:09:18.41 +07:17:24.2 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:20:33.03 +20:16:02.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:26:15.80 +40:29:48.2 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Jun 24 07:36 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 24 07:36 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 24 07:36 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
20:09:48.173 +02:16:25.39  AT 2026phz  2026-06-13.38 20.8294
22:19:00.831 +07:48:00.34  AT 2026phy  2026-06-11.46 20.7946
20:43:26.543 -12:30:32.16  AT 2026phx  2026-06-07.38 19.6286
19:16:05.245 +34:23:53.86  AT 2026phw  2026-06-11.40 21.0477
20:53:39.870 -23:08:50.55  AT 2026phv  2026-06-08.46 19.9936
23:01:17.643 -11:26:13.47  AT 2026phu  2026-06-10.46 19.7938
15:34:01.460 +32:14:21.95  AT 2026pht  2026-06-03.80 20.63
13:52:20.180 +26:36:28.29  AT 2026phs  2026-06-03.76 21.08
19:02:22.130 +47:04:24.55  AT 2026phr  2026-04-16.90 20.76
15:04:03.130 +51:40:36.19  AT 2026phq  2026-06-08.80 20.69
14:59:06.740 +49:19:47.55  AT 2026php  2026-06-03.82 21.24
15:25:14.430 +52:47:19.27  AT 2026pho  2026-06-03.82 20.69
15:32:10.430 +55:31:52.79  AT 2026phn  2026-06-03.82 20.55
15:05:31.070 +54:01:58.04  AT 2026phm  2026-06-03.82 20.97
15:26:20.470 +34:15:03.49  AT 2026phl  2026-06-03.81 21.22
15:30:53.386 +36:56:04.14  AT 2026phk  2026-06-03.81 20.62
15:53:00.067 +39:11:14.03  AT 2026phj  2026-06-03.81 20.35
15:16:47.570 +42:26:03.51  AT 2026phi  2026-06-03.80 21.4
15:30:43.080 +44:43:29.89  AT 2026phh  2026-06-03.80 20.99
15:34:17.400 +45:38:16.24  AT 2026phg  2026-06-03.80 20.99
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 24 07:36 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Jun 24 07:35:33 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 3 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 5 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 11 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 41s (0.68 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 51s (0.85 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 106s (1.77 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 4s (0.07 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 209s (3.48 min)
FIELD_Lac-01-Q2b1x1: 700s (11.67 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 702s (11.70 min)
Finished: Wed Jun 24 07:47:15 CDT 2026