This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3557 2461215.8557 12.11 16:43:07.52 -04:28:30.5
12.72822 25.82545 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche 1 1 1 12.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:07.52 -04:28:30.5: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:07.52 -04:28:30.5: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8557,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3557 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3557 2461215.8557 13.22 16:05:26.41 -04:28:43.6
6.52796 33.52556 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 0 1 1 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:05:26.41 -04:28:43.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:05:26.41 -04:28:43.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8557,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3557 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3557 2461215.8557 13.57 16:08:29.76 -04:38:00.2
6.92463 32.82298 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.323 Brucia -2 3 3 13.8 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:08:29.76 -04:38:00.2: 15.85 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:08:29.76 -04:38:00.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.85 +/- 0.36
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8557,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3557 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3557 2461215.8557 13.59 16:14:28.76 -00:57:42.2
11.54130 33.72745 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.276 Adelheid 1 2 2 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:14:28.76 -00:57:42.2: 15.46 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:14:28.76 -00:57:42.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.24
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 24.3557* 16 14 28.76 +00 57 42.2 13.6 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8557,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3557 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461215.85594257 24.06.2026 08:32:23.438 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9035
Objects passed selection criteria: 9031
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8360.75
Average stars matched: 8149.75 (97.4763 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 03:42:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
First image: 2461171.87744498 11.05.2026 09:03:21.246 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Last image: 2461215.85594257 24.06.2026 08:32:23.438 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57362
Objects passed selection criteria: 57266
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 52536
Average stars matched: 50843.2 (96.7779 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 157628 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 03:44:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461215.85540067
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.342 -01:58:28.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.342 -01:58:28.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0246 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.566 -01:59:09.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.566 -01:59:09.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.342 -01:58:28.73
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:09.566 -01:59:09.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01240 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8jE0q6MXJg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Nq9Rta5yN4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.M7YPPVrwOa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.92fIQzW7na
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.654300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.654300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2555 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4196 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2555 deg
Loaded 5100 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4363 out of 4531 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4531 out of 9303 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to +3.2557 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4229 to 252.1676 deg, Dec -7.2619 to 3.2557 deg
Loaded 5101 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4301 out of 4502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4502 out of 9216 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 10 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
3.1 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.1 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8jE0q6MXJg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, bad_region=0, passed=9303
Got 9303 stars (including 8762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9303 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9145 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.597 n_q1=303 n_q2=239 n_q3=203 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.357
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Nq9Rta5yN4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=594, bad_region=0, passed=9216
Got 9216 stars (including 8610 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9216 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9075 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.673 n_q1=305 n_q2=238 n_q3=206 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.393
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.M7YPPVrwOa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=321, bad_region=0, passed=7607
Got 7607 stars (including 7280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7607 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 412 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7520 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=317 n_q2=225 n_q3=212 n_q4=208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.92fIQzW7na (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=326, bad_region=0, passed=7550
Got 7550 stars (including 7220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=322 n_q2=224 n_q3=211 n_q4=206 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits sigma_overall=0.440 worst_q_ratio=1.357
ref2=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.393
new1=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.132
reference average sigma_overall=0.4615 worst_q_ratio=1.375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:07.52 -04:28:30.5: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:26:24.07 +02:22:58.1: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:26:24.07 +02:22:58.1: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:07.52 -04:28:30.5: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:24.07 +02:22:58.1: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2278 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20727.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20638_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20638_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:56.18 +01:57:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20663_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20663_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.32 -06:11:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20712_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20712_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:32.95 -01:04:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20727_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 20727_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20759_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20759_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:20.80 -06:44:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20760_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20760_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20761_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20761_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:20.71 +01:55:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 01177_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.11 +02:10:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02842_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 02842_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:32.58 +00:31:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07599_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 07599_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:40.05 -05:08:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:43:07.52 -04:28:30.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:08.342 -01:58:28.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:08.342 -01:58:28.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0246 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:09.566 -01:59:09.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:08.453 -01:59:57.20
Second-epoch image center 16:17:09.566 -01:59:09.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0141 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:08.342 -01:58:28.73
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:09.566 -01:59:09.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01240 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits &> /tmp/tmp.imf47dJjm2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Rg0zHgyih6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4PRw7w8k7a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VtL6irvPPD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits and wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.505400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.505400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 62856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to +3.2670 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4193 to 252.1657 deg, Dec -7.2637 to 3.2670 deg
Loaded 5105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4080 out of 4577 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4577 out of 62856 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 59865 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to +3.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 236.4230 to 252.1675 deg, Dec -7.2646 to 3.2660 deg
Loaded 5107 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4056 out of 4537 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4537 out of 59865 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 79 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
15.2 mag. Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.imf47dJjm2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=3582, bad_region=0, passed=62840
Got 62840 stars (including 59191 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62840 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62290 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.592 n_q1=305 n_q2=240 n_q3=206 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.435
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Rg0zHgyih6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3984, bad_region=0, passed=59855
Got 59855 stars (including 55797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59855 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=315 n_q2=230 n_q3=221 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.413
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits -region wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4PRw7w8k7a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1706, bad_region=3, passed=44419
Got 44419 stars (including 42643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=318 n_q2=228 n_q3=215 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VtL6irvPPD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1720, bad_region=3, passed=44493
Got 44493 stars (including 42715 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44493 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.7 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.404 n_q1=317 n_q2=225 n_q3=213 n_q4=207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.068
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-31-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_033344_TTUQ1b1x1_3162331_3C51qEwX/wcs_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:39:03.27 +00:30:57.1: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:48:25.25 +01:17:29.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:28:28.62 +00:38:09.3: 12.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:44:20.85 +00:53:27.1: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:52:19.45 -04:55:26.5: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:27:53.40 -04:26:41.2: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:54:17.39 -05:45:31.4: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:39:03.27 +00:30:57.1: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:03.27 +00:30:57.1: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9299 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:48:25.25 +01:17:29.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:48:25.25 +01:17:29.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:28:28.62 +00:38:09.3: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:28.62 +00:38:09.3: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1856 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:44:20.85 +00:53:27.1: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:27:53.40 -04:26:41.2: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:20.85 +00:53:27.1: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6615 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:53.40 -04:26:41.2: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9903 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:52:19.45 -04:55:26.5: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:19.45 -04:55:26.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3773 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:54:17.39 -05:45:31.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:17.39 -05:45:31.4: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0873 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:05:26.41 -04:28:43.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:05:26.41 -04:28:43.6: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:38:43.13 -00:04:22.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:47:06.88 -01:59:14.8: 13.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:41.59 +00:00:03.3: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:49:02.72 -06:10:31.2: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:38:43.13 -00:04:22.3: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:14:28.76 -00:57:42.2: 15.46 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:43.13 -00:04:22.3: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3839 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:46:28.02 -05:44:05.6: 14.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:08:29.76 -04:38:00.2: 15.85 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:47:06.88 -01:59:14.8: 13.56 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:06.88 -01:59:14.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4351 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:41.59 +00:00:03.3: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:41.59 +00:00:03.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7107 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:50:12.01 +00:12:47.1: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:20:56.92 -00:24:32.4: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:49:02.72 -06:10:31.2: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:46:28.02 -05:44:05.6: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:02.72 -06:10:31.2: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4799 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:14:28.76 -00:57:42.2: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.46 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:14:28.76 -00:57:42.2: ref_mag=15.46 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=13.5820 delta=1.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:28.02 -05:44:05.6: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7030 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:08:29.76 -04:38:00.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.85 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:08:29.76 -04:38:00.2: ref_mag=15.85 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=13.5718 delta=2.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:50:12.01 +00:12:47.1: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:20:56.92 -00:24:32.4: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:12.01 +00:12:47.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7177 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:56.92 -00:24:32.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6945 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:46:30.93 -06:14:26.7: 14.42 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:46:30.93 -06:14:26.7: 14.52 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:30.93 -06:14:26.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9000 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:29:38.96 -03:54:39.4: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:47:19.76 -05:59:17.0: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:47:16.24 -06:16:14.3: 14.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:25.13 -05:30:21.6: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:24:20.53 -03:37:00.1: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:29:38.96 -03:54:39.4: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:38.96 -03:54:39.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8466 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:47:16.24 -06:16:14.3: 14.57 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:16.24 -06:16:14.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9640 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:47:02.91 +00:44:33.7: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:47:19.76 -05:59:17.0: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:19.76 -05:59:17.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9926 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:24:20.53 -03:37:00.1: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:25.13 -05:30:21.6: 14.51 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:20.53 -03:37:00.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0512 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:25.13 -05:30:21.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0301 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:47:14.65 -06:04:54.4: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:47:02.91 +00:44:33.7: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:02.91 +00:44:33.7: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0707 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:47:14.65 -06:04:54.4: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:14.65 -06:04:54.4: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0638 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:46:38.44 -04:51:33.3: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:46:00.02 -06:12:22.8: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:46:38.44 -04:51:33.3: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:38.44 -04:51:33.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9484 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:29.13 +02:25:50.8: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:55.87 +02:13:06.3: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:46:00.02 -06:12:22.8: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:00.02 -06:12:22.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8924 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:49:37.14 +02:43:52.2: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:55.87 +02:13:06.3: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:55.87 +02:13:06.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1481 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:29.13 +02:25:50.8: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:29.13 +02:25:50.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0343 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:47:22.06 +00:47:48.4: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:05.63 -05:23:19.9: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:49:37.14 +02:43:52.2: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:37.14 +02:43:52.2: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2134 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:05.63 -05:23:19.9: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:47:22.06 +00:47:48.4: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:05.63 -05:23:19.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.9517 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:22.06 +00:47:48.4: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1141 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:49:24.67 -00:24:06.1: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:54:00.08 +03:13:11.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:47:30.28 -04:42:52.2: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:49:24.67 -00:24:06.1: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:24.67 -00:24:06.1: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1844 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:54:00.08 +03:13:11.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:00.08 +03:13:11.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:46:17.59 -03:04:13.7: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:47:30.28 -04:42:52.2: 14.26 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:30.28 -04:42:52.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1557 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:46:38.47 -02:01:42.4: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:47:30.39 -04:15:07.9: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:46:17.59 -03:04:13.7: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:44.92 +01:42:24.0: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:17.59 -03:04:13.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2138 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:47:30.39 -04:15:07.9: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:30.39 -04:15:07.9: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1661 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:46:38.47 -02:01:42.4: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:38.47 -02:01:42.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2114 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:44.92 +01:42:24.0: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:44.92 +01:42:24.0: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0930 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:46:16.49 -05:45:03.3: 14.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:32.33 +01:38:02.3: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:59.40 +02:24:29.7: 14.70 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:43:35.60 +01:06:30.9: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:46:16.49 -05:45:03.3: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:16.49 -05:45:03.3: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0560 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:32.33 +01:38:02.3: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:32.33 +01:38:02.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2551 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:59.40 +02:24:29.7: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:59.40 +02:24:29.7: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4602 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:58:56.42 -03:00:56.3: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:43:35.60 +01:06:30.9: 15.21 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 16:35:16.68 -02:13:41.8: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:35.60 +01:06:30.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5467 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:58:56.42 -03:00:56.3: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:56.42 -03:00:56.3: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4993 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 16:35:16.68 -02:13:41.8: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_04-03-21_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0439.fits at 15:48:22.45 -00:25:03.1: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:35:16.68 -02:13:41.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5937 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_04-36-06_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0414.fits at 15:48:22.45 -00:25:03.1: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:22.45 -00:25:03.1: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5215 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78217.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78395.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78409.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77575_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 77575_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77576_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 77576_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77580_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 77580_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77584_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 77584_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77585_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 77585_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77586_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 77586_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77810_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 77810_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:43:07.51 -04:28:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77832_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 77832_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78100_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78100_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:05.19 -05:43:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78149_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78149_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:48:27.52 +00:19:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78162_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78162_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:22.46 +02:13:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78206_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78206_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:40.89 -02:39:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78217_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 78217_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78243_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78243_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78267_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78267_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:27.59 +00:38:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78296_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78296_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:10.81 -02:10:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78316_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78316_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78371_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78371_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78395_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 78395_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78402_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78402_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78409_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 78409_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78458_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78458_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78472_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78472_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78503_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78503_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78555_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78555_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:28.40 +01:22:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78565_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78565_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:48.97 -06:41:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78599_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78599_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78603_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78603_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:07.73 +01:27:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78623_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78623_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78646_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78646_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78652_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78652_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78661_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78661_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78708_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78708_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78726_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78726_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78741_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78741_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78760_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78760_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78771_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78771_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78773_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78773_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:26.43 -06:56:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78774_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78774_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78811_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78811_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:08.16 -06:25:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78830_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78830_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78831_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78831_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78851_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78851_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78853_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78853_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78858_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78858_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78868_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78868_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78869_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78869_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78870_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78870_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78897_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78897_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78955_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78955_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78967_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78967_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78996_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 78996_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79007_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 79007_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79077_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 79077_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79131_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 79131_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79139_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 79139_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79144_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 79144_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72948_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 72948_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51952_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 51952_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:37:40.05 -05:08:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17421_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 17421_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:32.59 +00:31:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 06356_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:00:58.11 +02:10:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58683_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 58683_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:06.40 -04:07:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47345_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 47345_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.18 -05:51:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73257_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 73257_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:42.63 +02:22:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 73181_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:17.63 +01:17:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73172_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 73172_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:33.54 -05:17:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30048_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 30048_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:50.53 -01:21:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73058_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 73058_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:53.06 +01:18:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73010_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 73010_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:46.83 -06:08:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72999_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 72999_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:08.99 -04:09:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72992_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 72992_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:44.95 +01:49:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72985_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 72985_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:18.18 +01:45:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72978_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 72978_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:44.78 +02:32:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72970_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 72970_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:58.48 -04:12:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72958_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 72958_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:20.92 -05:33:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72931_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 72931_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.04 -04:13:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03898_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 03898_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:02.78 +02:35:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 45739_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.32 -06:11:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49517_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 49517_fd_Ser-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-32-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks