This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3512 2461215.8512 12.67 15:39:49.11 +05:24:17.0
12.16891 44.46019 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.660 Crescentia 0 -0 0 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:39:49.11 +05:24:17.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:39:49.11 +05:24:17.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 24.3512* 15 39 49.11 +05 24 17.0 12.7 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8512,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3512 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3512 2461215.8512 12.90 15:15:58.70 +01:33:17.6
2.66673 46.96091 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.173 Ino 1 -1 1 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:15:58.70 +01:33:17.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:15:58.70 +01:33:17.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 24.3512* 15 15 58.70 +01 33 17.6 12.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8512,12.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3512 12.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3512 2461215.8512 13.43 15:25:56.00 +07:03:02.3
11.40919 48.24723 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.304 Olga 0 0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:25:56.00 +07:03:02.3: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:25:56.00 +07:03:02.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 24.3512* 15 25 56.00 +07 03 02.3 13.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8512,13.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3512 13.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3512 2461215.8512 14.40 15:42:36.04 +06:29:47.9
13.98008 44.46773 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.781 Kartvelia 0 -1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:42:36.04 +06:29:47.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:42:36.04 +06:29:47.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 24.3512* 15 42 36.04 +06 29 47.9 14.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461215.8512,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260624.3512 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 24.3512 2461215.8512 13.40 15:28:43.63 +03:49:41.4
8.10276 45.83993 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.9" and 8.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" MW Ser
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.659 g Y 4.143 g 647.000000000000 M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:28:43.63 +03:49:41.4: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:28:43.63 +03:49:41.4: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 24.3512* 15 28 43.63 +03 49 41.4 13.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
MW Ser,2461215.8512,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
MW Ser 20260624.3512 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
First image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Last image: 2461215.85154116 24.06.2026 08:26:03.156 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 20
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8538
Objects passed selection criteria: 8532
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7406.75
Average stars matched: 7283.5 (98.336 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114348 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 07:45:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
First image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Last image: 2461215.85154116 24.06.2026 08:26:03.156 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 45391
Objects passed selection criteria: 45324
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39795
Average stars matched: 38559 (96.8941 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 148476 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 23 15:09:51 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-109-g76dded0d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-23)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 24 07:48:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461215.85079993
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.618 +06:01:01.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:42.618 +06:01:01.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0144 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:39.984 +06:00:20.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:39.984 +06:00:20.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:42.618 +06:01:01.56
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:39.984 +06:00:20.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01582 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kybvbG2R7F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wzQOf9OyKr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e3xxU8ZgSr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HWn5Ru9H6B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec +0.7206 to +11.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec 0.7206 to 11.2696 deg
Loaded 4612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3905 out of 4067 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4067 out of 9347 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec +0.7206 to +11.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec 0.7206 to 11.2696 deg
Loaded 4612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3905 out of 4067 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4067 out of 9347 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8606 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4675 to 239.3569 deg, Dec +0.7513 to +11.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4675 to 239.3569 deg, Dec 0.7513 to 11.2730 deg
Loaded 4602 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3919 out of 4066 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4066 out of 8606 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.2 pix fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
3.2 pix fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kybvbG2R7F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=545, bad_region=0, passed=9347
Got 9347 stars (including 8797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.563 n_q1=210 n_q2=276 n_q3=216 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wzQOf9OyKr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=477, bad_region=0, passed=8606
Got 8606 stars (including 8121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8606 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.668 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.584 n_q1=262 n_q2=238 n_q3=253 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.523
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e3xxU8ZgSr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=257, bad_region=0, passed=5946
Got 5946 stars (including 5682 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.417 n_q1=291 n_q2=224 n_q3=264 n_q4=195 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HWn5Ru9H6B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=258, bad_region=0, passed=5897
Got 5897 stars (including 5637 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5897 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=286 n_q2=225 n_q3=268 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.304
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits sigma_overall=0.448 worst_q_ratio=1.257
ref2=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.439 worst_q_ratio=1.523
new1=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.314
new2=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.304
reference average sigma_overall=0.4435 worst_q_ratio=1.39
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:54:32.90 +01:54:43.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:55.22 +01:24:13.9: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:41.75 +01:27:12.6: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:54:43.79 +01:55:57.1: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:57:00.12 +01:23:09.4: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:41.75 +01:27:12.6: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:55.22 +01:24:13.9: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:54:32.90 +01:54:43.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:32.90 +01:54:43.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:41.75 +01:27:12.6: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0077 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:55.22 +01:24:13.9: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8343 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:54:43.79 +01:55:57.1: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:57:00.12 +01:23:09.4: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:43.79 +01:55:57.1: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0815 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:00.12 +01:23:09.4: ref_mag=11.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7151 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20241_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20241_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:47.98 +08:15:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20267_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:01.59 +02:01:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20271_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20271_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:26.52 +01:59:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20288_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.29 +02:06:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20290_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20290_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:29.55 +09:01:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20293_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20293_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:54:37.01 +01:39:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20298_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20298_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:54:38.82 +02:00:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20310_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20310_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:54:50.40 +01:23:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20335_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20335_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:45.28 +01:41:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20352_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20352_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:06.47 +01:29:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20387_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20387_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20391_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20391_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20401_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20435_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20435_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20440_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20440_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20445_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:31.56 +02:26:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05299_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 05299_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:06.47 +06:31:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:42.618 +06:01:01.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:42.618 +06:01:01.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0144 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:39.984 +06:00:20.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:39.984 +06:00:20.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:42.618 +06:01:01.56
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:39.984 +06:00:20.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01582 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1FNCCt4hdo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xkgh3imMAn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HKZQ27VbU0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m7H9YY3PAF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec +0.7180 to +11.2709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec 0.7180 to 11.2709 deg
Loaded 4623 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4071 out of 52266 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.601700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.601700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec +0.7180 to +11.2709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec 0.7180 to 11.2709 deg
Loaded 4623 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4071 out of 52266 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 48109 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4676 to 239.3758 deg, Dec +0.7481 to +11.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4676 to 239.3758 deg, Dec 0.7481 to 11.2767 deg
Loaded 4608 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4078 out of 48109 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
3.0 pix fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
15.4 mag. Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1FNCCt4hdo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2645, bad_region=2, passed=52245
Got 52245 stars (including 49533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51532 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=221 n_q2=271 n_q3=216 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xkgh3imMAn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2468, bad_region=0, passed=48097
Got 48097 stars (including 45572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48097 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47610 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=268 n_q2=241 n_q3=250 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.523
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HKZQ27VbU0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=913, bad_region=7, passed=29971
Got 29971 stars (including 29013 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29501 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=286 n_q2=226 n_q3=265 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.196
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.m7H9YY3PAF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=880, bad_region=3, passed=30020
Got 30020 stars (including 29092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30020 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29484 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=290 n_q2=222 n_q3=265 n_q4=197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-24-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-24_CI_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_032646_TTUQ1b1x1_1517256_XXc4U36M/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:44:24.99 +05:00:47.4: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:10:49.96 +04:23:25.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:07:54.57 +03:25:57.2: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:55.22 +01:24:14.0: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:41.75 +01:27:12.6: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:54:43.79 +01:55:57.1: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:58:00.11 +01:25:57.1: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:59.93 +01:59:57.8: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:24.99 +05:00:47.4: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:10:49.96 +04:23:25.1: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:24.99 +05:00:47.4: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8892 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:07:54.57 +03:25:57.2: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:49.96 +04:23:25.1: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6523 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:07:54.57 +03:25:57.2: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6028 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:54:33.54 +01:34:12.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:55.22 +01:24:14.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:55.22 +01:24:14.0: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5975 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:41.75 +01:27:12.6: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:54:43.79 +01:55:57.1: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:59.93 +01:59:57.8: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:58:00.11 +01:25:57.1: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:41.75 +01:27:12.6: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7444 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:43.79 +01:55:57.1: ref_mag=11.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8332 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:59.93 +01:59:57.8: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0929 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:58:00.11 +01:25:57.1: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7860 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:39:49.11 +05:24:17.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:54:33.54 +01:34:12.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:33.54 +01:34:12.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:56:28.89 +01:32:45.0: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:56:24.75 +01:35:21.0: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:21.10 +01:57:00.0: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:39:49.11 +05:24:17.0: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:36.93 +01:51:57.3: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:15:58.70 +01:33:17.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:54:33.98 +01:31:57.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:56:28.89 +01:32:45.0: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:28.89 +01:32:45.0: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5270 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:21.10 +01:57:00.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:56:24.75 +01:35:21.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:21.10 +01:57:00.0: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5352 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:24.75 +01:35:21.0: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5567 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:54:28.41 +02:30:23.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:57:07.56 +01:31:14.9: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:32.21 +01:47:12.2: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:36.93 +01:51:57.3: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:36.93 +01:51:57.3: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5867 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:15:58.70 +01:33:17.6: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:54:33.98 +01:31:57.0: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:33.98 +01:31:57.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:54:28.41 +02:30:23.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:28.41 +02:30:23.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:57:07.56 +01:31:14.9: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:07.56 +01:31:14.9: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8766 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:32.21 +01:47:12.2: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:32.21 +01:47:12.2: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9491 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:41:54.06 +10:34:45.7: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:03.56 +02:02:43.8: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:37.72 +02:16:07.5: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:54:43.71 +01:43:10.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:41:54.06 +10:34:45.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:54.06 +10:34:45.7: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3527 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:03.56 +02:02:43.8: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:37.72 +02:16:07.5: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:03.56 +02:02:43.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8791 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:37.72 +02:16:07.5: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9179 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:56:38.31 +01:24:51.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:25:56.00 +07:03:02.3: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:26.43 +01:42:29.6: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:56:05.74 +02:01:24.6: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:54:43.71 +01:43:10.6: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:43.71 +01:43:10.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9826 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:25:56.00 +07:03:02.3: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:56:38.31 +01:24:51.8: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:38.31 +01:24:51.8: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9303 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:26.43 +01:42:29.6: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:26.43 +01:42:29.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3303 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:56:05.74 +02:01:24.6: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:05.74 +02:01:24.6: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3544 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:31.59 +01:57:29.6: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:23.50 +01:47:48.5: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:20.97 +01:40:24.6: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:45:27.60 +04:01:49.3: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:23.50 +01:47:48.5: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:31.59 +01:57:29.6: 13.67 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:23.50 +01:47:48.5: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2763 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:31.59 +01:57:29.6: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2796 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:20.97 +01:40:24.6: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:20.97 +01:40:24.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2755 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:26.46 +01:38:00.1: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:56:47.58 +01:30:46.1: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:44:37.23 +05:03:48.5: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:27.60 +04:01:49.3: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:27.60 +04:01:49.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7849 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:26.46 +01:38:00.1: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:26.46 +01:38:00.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4220 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:56:47.58 +01:30:46.1: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:47.58 +01:30:46.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3988 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:37.23 +05:03:48.5: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:37.23 +05:03:48.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9170 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:56:23.95 +02:00:34.8: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:42:36.04 +06:29:47.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:28:43.63 +03:49:41.4: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:57:06.00 +01:22:38.5: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:56:23.95 +02:00:34.8: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:23.95 +02:00:34.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5148 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:42:36.04 +06:29:47.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:28:43.63 +03:49:41.4: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:57:00.99 +10:59:06.1: 12.91 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:28:43.63 +03:49:41.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3999 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:56:06.09 +02:58:04.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:06.80 +03:10:29.9: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:57:06.00 +01:22:38.5: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:06.00 +01:22:38.5: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7757 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:57:00.99 +10:59:06.1: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:00.99 +10:59:06.1: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5671 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:56:06.09 +02:58:04.0: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:06.80 +03:10:29.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:06.09 +02:58:04.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7607 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:06.80 +03:10:29.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7529 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:56:00.91 +02:04:55.3: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:52.07 +02:20:20.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:56:00.91 +02:04:55.3: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:00.91 +02:04:55.3: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0005 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 14:55:21.50 +01:34:14.2: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:52.07 +02:20:20.9: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:52.07 +02:20:20.9: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9574 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 14:55:21.50 +01:34:14.2: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:21.50 +01:34:14.2: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2851 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out14455.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66222.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66341.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66510.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out66859.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65913_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65913_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65917_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65917_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65919_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65919_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65946_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65946_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:01.60 +02:01:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65950_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65950_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:26.53 +01:59:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65962_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65962_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:06.77 +01:33:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65973_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65973_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:54:37.02 +01:39:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65989_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65989_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:54:50.40 +01:23:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65990_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65990_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.42 +02:06:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65999_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65999_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:20.97 +01:59:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66017_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66017_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:45.28 +01:41:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66044_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66044_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:02.95 +01:54:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66089_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66089_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66117_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66117_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66121_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66121_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66127_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66127_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66172_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66172_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66180_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66180_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66216_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66216_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:24.44 +02:02:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66222_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 66222_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66273_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66273_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66282_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66282_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66294_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66294_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66300_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66300_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66322_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66322_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:22.44 +02:13:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66341_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 66341_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66357_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66357_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66378_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66378_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66389_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66389_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66390_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66390_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66398_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66398_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66407_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66407_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66430_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66430_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66434_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66434_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66458_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66458_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66467_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66467_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:08.44 +08:06:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66472_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66472_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66510_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 66510_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66550_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66550_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66552_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66552_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66579_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66579_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66588_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66588_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66589_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66589_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66604_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66604_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66611_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66611_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66615_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66615_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66647_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66647_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66665_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66665_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66859_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 66859_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14455_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 14455_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62418_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 62418_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62444_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 62444_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62434_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 62434_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62426_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 62426_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62400_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 62400_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62399_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 62399_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62362_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 62362_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07898_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 07898_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:31.55 +02:26:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20691_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20691_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:39.22 +05:00:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29055_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 29055_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:06.47 +06:31:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39993_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 39993_fd_Ser-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-24_03-26-03_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks