This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 23.1571 2461214.6571 13.21 09:27:11.10 +29:56:27.7
196.72770 45.41923 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.4" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:27:11.10 +29:56:27.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:27:11.10 +29:56:27.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:27:11.10 +29:56:27.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 23.1571* 09 27 11.10 +29 56 27.7 13.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461214.6571,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260623.1571 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 23.1571 2461214.6571 13.83 10:29:10.84 +31:08:03.5
196.94099 58.80997 galactic LMi Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.9" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:29:10.84 +31:08:03.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:29:10.84 +31:08:03.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:29:10.84 +31:08:03.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461214.6571,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260623.1571 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 23.1571 2461214.6571 13.79 10:20:24.40 +25:37:51.2
206.73399 56.26739 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:20:24.40 +25:37:51.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:20:24.40 +25:37:51.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:20:24.40 +25:37:51.2: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 23.1571* 10 20 24.40 +25 37 51.2 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461214.6571,13.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260623.1571 13.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 23.1571 2461214.6571 13.85 10:06:34.50 +26:31:34.7
204.19707 53.38383 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:06:34.50 +26:31:34.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:06:34.50 +26:31:34.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:06:34.50 +26:31:34.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 23.1571* 10 06 34.50 +26 31 34.7 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461214.6571,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260623.1571 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 23.1571 2461214.6571 14.26 09:59:42.64 +31:04:23.1
196.37853 52.51046 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:59:42.64 +31:04:23.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:59:42.64 +31:04:23.1: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:59:42.64 +31:04:23.1: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 23.1571* 09 59 42.64 +31 04 23.1 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461214.6571,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260623.1571 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
First image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Last image: 2461214.65729243 23.06.2026 03:46:20.066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7244
Objects passed selection criteria: 7200
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5002.5
Average stars matched: 4880.75 (97.5662 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113176 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 22:55:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
First image: 2461058.84609446 18.01.2026 08:18:12.561 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Last image: 2461214.65729243 23.06.2026 03:46:20.066 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 130
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 36405
Objects passed selection criteria: 36308
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27169
Average stars matched: 26309.5 (96.8365 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 138532 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 22:57:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461214.65688003
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:08.418 +30:00:37.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:08.418 +30:00:37.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0305 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:08.263 +30:00:25.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:08.263 +30:00:25.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0286 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:00:08.418 +30:00:37.07
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:08.263 +30:00:25.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00320 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BnLlk2Qn6g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q4JtZAvbcU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u2rC9usZuw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.StTA3CeUa0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.915600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.915600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.45
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2123 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2123 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4029 out of 4262 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4262 out of 7484 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec +24.2124 to +35.3396 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.2854 deg, Dec 24.2124 to 35.3396 deg
Loaded 5544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4039 out of 4263 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4263 out of 7488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.1 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
2.2 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
15.5 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BnLlk2Qn6g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=536, bad_region=0, passed=7484
Got 7484 stars (including 6942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7484 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7363 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=240 n_q2=204 n_q3=230 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q4JtZAvbcU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=531, bad_region=0, passed=7488
Got 7488 stars (including 6948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7351 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7349 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 916 stars left (next iteration limit 1007)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=240 n_q2=209 n_q3=228 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.u2rC9usZuw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=193, bad_region=0, passed=2590
Got 2590 stars (including 2394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2590 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2539 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2540 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 906 stars left (next iteration limit 996)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits N_match=906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=248 n_q2=218 n_q3=193 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.StTA3CeUa0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=175, bad_region=0, passed=2546
Got 2546 stars (including 2369 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2546 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=251 n_q2=217 n_q3=193 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits sigma_overall=0.270 worst_q_ratio=1.274
ref2=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.319
new1=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.104
new2=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.194
reference average sigma_overall=0.2725 worst_q_ratio=1.2965
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367_astrometric_residuals.png (916 matched stars from wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064_astrometric_residuals.png (906 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065_astrometric_residuals.png (905 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 20444_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:25.60 +34:14:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06370_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 06370_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:45:34.44 +34:30:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07245_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 07245_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:53:43.20 +34:55:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02814_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 02814_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:25.65 +28:47:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:08.418 +30:00:37.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:08.418 +30:00:37.07
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0305 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:00:08.263 +30:00:25.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:00:00.900 +29:59:47.24
Second-epoch image center 10:00:08.263 +30:00:25.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0286 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:00:08.418 +30:00:37.07
Second-epoch second image center 10:00:08.263 +30:00:25.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00320 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xchjIW69zA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VSE7c9HIJN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c8cFlYOjzG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rytM3PqBkO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits and wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg
Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.818400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.818400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 38246 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3613 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3222 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3613 deg
Loaded 5586 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3889 out of 4321 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4321 out of 38246 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 38277 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec +24.1766 to +35.3559 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 140.2252 to 159.3238 deg, Dec 24.1766 to 35.3559 deg
Loaded 5585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3878 out of 4316 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4316 out of 38277 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 113 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.0 pix Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
15.6 mag. Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xchjIW69zA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1709, bad_region=2, passed=38233
Got 38233 stars (including 36464 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38233 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 914 stars left (next iteration limit 1005)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits N_match=914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.222 n_q1=246 n_q2=205 n_q3=222 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VSE7c9HIJN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1697, bad_region=2, passed=38258
Got 38258 stars (including 36496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37698 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.2 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 913 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37699 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 913 stars left (next iteration limit 1004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits N_match=913 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.246 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=236 n_q2=209 n_q3=227 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits -region wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.c8cFlYOjzG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=403, bad_region=29, passed=16589
Got 16589 stars (including 16134 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16589 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 903 stars left (next iteration limit 993)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits N_match=903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=248 n_q2=216 n_q3=195 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rytM3PqBkO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=394, bad_region=29, passed=16268
Got 16268 stars (including 15823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 903 stars left (next iteration limit 993)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits N_match=903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=253 n_q2=216 n_q3=194 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-45-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0064.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_225141_TTUQ1b1x1_4052568_DMm6f47M/wcs_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:00:56.89 +24:56:28.1: 12.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:56:47.05 +33:38:25.2: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:01:24.20 +28:48:03.8: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:56:47.05 +33:38:25.2: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:00:56.89 +24:56:28.1: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:01:22.55 +28:45:56.2: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:56:47.05 +33:38:25.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8035 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:00:56.89 +24:56:28.1: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7363 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:01:24.20 +28:48:03.8: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:24.20 +28:48:03.8: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8046 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:01:22.55 +28:45:56.2: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:22.55 +28:45:56.2: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8827 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:27:11.10 +29:56:27.7: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:13:02.65 +32:55:49.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:55:29.90 +35:00:22.3: 13.20 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:27:11.10 +29:56:27.7: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:16:05.13 +32:00:16.2: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:13:02.65 +32:55:49.9: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:02.65 +32:55:49.9: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4458 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:29:10.84 +31:08:03.5: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:55:29.90 +35:00:22.3: 13.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:55:29.90 +35:00:22.3: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4046 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:16:05.13 +32:00:16.2: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:05.13 +32:00:16.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3282 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:29:10.84 +31:08:03.5: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:20:24.40 +25:37:51.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 10:06:34.50 +26:31:34.7: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:20:24.40 +25:37:51.2: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0366.fits at 09:59:42.64 +31:04:23.1: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 10:06:34.50 +26:31:34.7: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_02-18-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0367.fits at 09:59:42.64 +31:04:23.1: 16.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53126.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53233.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53295.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52433_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52433_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52435_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52485_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52485_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52556_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52556_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52558_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52558_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52597_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52603_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52603_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52606_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52606_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52631_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52631_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52637_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52638_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52638_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52652_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52652_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52655_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52655_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52725_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52725_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52757_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52766_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52766_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52791_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52791_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:00.21 +31:29:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52821_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52829_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52830_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52830_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52834_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52834_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52850_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52857_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52878_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52900_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52907_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52911_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52911_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:07.88 +32:14:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52920_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52920_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52961_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52962_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52962_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:19:27.94 +33:44:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52963_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52964_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52964_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52968_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52968_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52973_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52986_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52986_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52992_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52993_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 52995_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53000_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53004_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 53008_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53017_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53022_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:35:13.77 +32:13:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53024_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53026_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53026_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53030_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53033_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53033_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53035_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53038_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53038_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53043_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53044_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53056_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53057_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53057_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53058_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53058_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53062_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53063_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53079_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53079_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53088_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53088_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53089_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53089_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53093_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53093_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53104_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53104_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53112_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53112_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53119_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53119_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53121_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53121_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53123_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53123_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53124_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53124_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53126_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 53126_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53129_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53129_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53131_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53131_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53137_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53138_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53139_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53139_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53140_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53140_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53141_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53141_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53143_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53146_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53150_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53150_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53157_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53171_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53171_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53178_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53186_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53186_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53199_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53199_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:04:15.03 +34:30:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53203_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53203_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53211_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53211_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53215_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53215_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53216_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53216_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53227_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53227_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53233_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 53233_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53234_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53234_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53237_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53237_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53239_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53239_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53242_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53245_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53245_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53246_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53246_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53250_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53250_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53251_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53251_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53252_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53252_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53256_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53256_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53258_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 53258_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53261_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53263_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53263_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53264_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53264_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53271_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53271_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53281_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53286_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53286_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53288_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53288_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
Preparing report for the candidate 53295_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53298_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53298_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53305_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 53305_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03431_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 03431_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24933_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 24933_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:45:34.43 +34:30:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 25509_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:39:25.61 +34:14:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23951_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065
The candidate 23951_fd_Leo-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_22-46-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0065 did not pass the final checks