This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2345 2461213.7345 10.39 16:06:56.66 -20:23:02.5
352.99873 22.94529 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia -1 -1 2 10.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:56.66 -20:23:02.5: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:56.66 -20:23:02.5: 15.12 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.30
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7345,10.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2345 10.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2345 2461213.7345 13.42 16:03:23.57 -15:30:04.3
356.32175 26.87953 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara 0 -0 0 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:03:23.57 -15:30:04.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:03:23.57 -15:30:04.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7345,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2345 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2345 2461213.7345 13.98 16:13:02.84 -16:11:44.4
357.45595 24.68171 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.358 Apollonia 0 0 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:13:02.84 -16:11:44.4: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:13:02.84 -16:11:44.4: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7345,13.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2345 13.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2345 2461213.7345 14.23 16:12:30.74 -15:09:24.5
358.23046 25.45867 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.741 Botolphia -0 0 0 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:30.74 -15:09:24.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:30.74 -15:09:24.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7345,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2345 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2345 2461213.7345 12.00 16:12:11.11 -21:45:50.3
352.81227 21.10982 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 -0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:11.11 -21:45:50.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:11.11 -21:45:50.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7345,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2345 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461213.73482417 22.06.2026 05:37:58.808 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7363
Objects passed selection criteria: 7347
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5910.5
Average stars matched: 5451.5 (92.2342 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112572 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 01:20:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461213.73482417 22.06.2026 05:37:58.808 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 139
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 56262
Objects passed selection criteria: 56145
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 46416
Average stars matched: 42293.2 (91.1178 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151180 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 01:23:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461213.73419061
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.828 -18:00:21.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:00.828 -18:00:21.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.680 -18:00:42.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.680 -18:00:42.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:00.828 -18:00:21.88
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:01.680 -18:00:42.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00665 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TO6rYH1TJS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.64K09YRoc5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l9oSxm2xIO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ocMmRSlNKb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.710400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.710400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4659 out of 4800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4800 out of 7612 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 12 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TO6rYH1TJS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, bad_region=1351, passed=7602
Got 7602 stars (including 5850 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=313 n_q2=210 n_q3=286 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.64K09YRoc5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, bad_region=1353, passed=7612
Got 7612 stars (including 5871 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=314 n_q2=210 n_q3=284 n_q4=161 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l9oSxm2xIO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=387, bad_region=1784, passed=7449
Got 7449 stars (including 5367 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7449 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=295 n_q2=199 n_q3=278 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ocMmRSlNKb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=396, bad_region=1791, passed=7386
Got 7386 stars (including 5290 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=294 n_q2=199 n_q3=279 n_q4=196 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.421 worst_q_ratio=1.142
ref2=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.159
new1=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.152
new2=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits sigma_overall=0.419 worst_q_ratio=1.056
reference average sigma_overall=0.416 worst_q_ratio=1.1505
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:47.52 -19:01:25.9: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:48.18 -17:00:12.4: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:59.24 -18:44:04.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:54.84 -16:28:32.7: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:56.66 -20:23:02.5: 15.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:11.52 -16:55:15.7: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:24.54 -18:38:24.4: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:56.66 -20:23:02.5: 15.12 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:54.84 -16:28:32.7: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:59.24 -18:44:04.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:47.52 -19:01:25.9: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:48.18 -17:00:12.4: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.30
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:11.52 -16:55:15.7: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:54.84 -16:28:32.7: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8428 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:06:56.66 -20:23:02.5: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.30 new_mean_mag=10.3965 delta=4.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:59.24 -18:44:04.0: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8917 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:47.52 -19:01:25.9: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8938 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:48.18 -17:00:12.4: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8884 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:11.52 -16:55:15.7: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8471 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:57:24.54 -18:38:24.4: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:24.54 -18:38:24.4: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9290 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20575_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
Preparing report for the candidate 20575_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20673_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 20673_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.93 -21:31:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20930_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 20930_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.93 -16:36:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21080_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 21080_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.58 -20:06:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21082_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 21082_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:31.34 -18:38:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21236_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 21236_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21261_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 21261_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21275_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 21275_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21291_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 21291_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21299_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 21299_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21300_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 21300_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03712_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 03712_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.78 -18:18:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:06:56.66 -20:23:02.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.828 -18:00:21.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:00.828 -18:00:21.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0120 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.680 -18:00:42.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.680 -18:00:42.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0186 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:00.828 -18:00:21.88
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:01.680 -18:00:42.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00665 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5E5DDVTsC4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QRpLzAKowR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cFeI7em75S
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2izgESDHEE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.536600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.536600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 58808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Loaded 5929 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4737 out of 5215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5215 out of 58808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 86 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5E5DDVTsC4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2882, bad_region=9662, passed=59407
Got 59407 stars (including 47245 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59407 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51203 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=329 n_q2=199 n_q3=278 n_q4=165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QRpLzAKowR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2840, bad_region=9580, passed=58797
Got 58797 stars (including 46775 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.413 n_q1=329 n_q2=205 n_q3=268 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cFeI7em75S (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2504, bad_region=7369, passed=50943
Got 50943 stars (including 41633 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50943 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44402 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=289 n_q2=201 n_q3=286 n_q4=194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2izgESDHEE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=2596, bad_region=7534, passed=51859
Got 51859 stars (including 42374 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51859 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45266 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=295 n_q2=197 n_q3=280 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0176.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_011421_TTUQ2b1x1_3196154_Ds9zw6Bo/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:17.79 -19:35:33.6: 14.20 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:27.13 -20:21:42.5: 14.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:01.16 -19:15:29.3: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:10.16 -14:28:11.8: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:28.57 -20:10:41.2: 14.80 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:17.79 -19:35:33.6: 13.94 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:27.13 -20:21:42.5: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:17.79 -19:35:33.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1503 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:27.13 -20:21:42.5: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2680 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:28.57 -20:10:41.2: 14.45 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:01.16 -19:15:29.3: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:28.57 -20:10:41.2: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3764 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:01.16 -19:15:29.3: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3583 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:03:23.57 -15:30:04.3: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:10.16 -14:28:11.8: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:10.16 -14:28:11.8: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0610 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:41:59.20 -15:33:27.2: 13.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:56.17 -19:43:21.2: 15.19 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:03:23.57 -15:30:04.3: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:41:59.20 -15:33:27.2: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:59.20 -15:33:27.2: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5544 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:11:56.17 -19:43:21.2: 15.09 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:42:00.68 -19:28:16.3: 13.53 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:11:56.17 -19:43:21.2: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=13.6677 delta=1.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:19.56 -19:06:36.3: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:03:59.14 -21:56:30.5: 13.71 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:11.33 -13:56:24.2: 13.71 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:07.12 -14:09:18.2: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:42:00.68 -19:28:16.3: 13.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:00.68 -19:28:16.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7578 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:03:59.14 -21:56:30.5: 13.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:19.56 -19:06:36.3: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:59.14 -21:56:30.5: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7335 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:19.56 -19:06:36.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7614 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:11.33 -13:56:24.2: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:11.33 -13:56:24.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9106 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:07.12 -14:09:18.2: 13.93 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:07.12 -14:09:18.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9828 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:13:02.84 -16:11:44.4: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:39.50 -19:00:12.5: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:13:02.84 -16:11:44.4: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:39.50 -19:00:12.5: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:39.50 -19:00:12.5: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.9648 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:24.57 -14:28:38.7: 14.56 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:46.47 -22:15:01.8: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:52:24.57 -14:28:38.7: 14.95 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:27.17 -13:53:50.3: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:24.57 -14:28:38.7: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2129 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:46.47 -22:15:01.8: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:46.47 -22:15:01.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0279 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:11.70 -14:06:21.6: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:41:35.65 -15:52:25.0: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:01.92 -21:03:20.9: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:02.04 -13:55:05.5: 14.35 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:32.92 -15:11:56.2: 14.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:57:27.17 -13:53:50.3: 14.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:27.17 -13:53:50.3: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4489 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:11.70 -14:06:21.6: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:11.70 -14:06:21.6: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4719 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:02.04 -13:55:05.5: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:01.92 -21:03:20.9: 14.64 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:41:35.65 -15:52:25.0: 14.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:01.92 -21:03:20.9: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2074 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:02.04 -13:55:05.5: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3031 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:35.65 -15:52:25.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3743 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:32.92 -15:11:56.2: 14.58 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:32.92 -15:11:56.2: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4395 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:27.44 -22:11:03.3: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:44.44 -20:36:05.0: 14.63 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:33.75 -16:56:39.5: 15.17 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:27.44 -22:11:03.3: 14.31 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:27.44 -22:11:03.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2553 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:44.44 -20:36:05.0: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:44.44 -20:36:05.0: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3702 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:30.74 -15:09:24.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:37.99 -13:50:18.2: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:33.75 -16:56:39.5: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:56.68 -15:22:51.4: 14.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:48.04 -14:01:23.9: 14.59 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:33.75 -16:56:39.5: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2581 delta=0.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:30.74 -15:09:24.5: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:37.99 -13:50:18.2: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:37.99 -13:50:18.2: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4505 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:56.68 -15:22:51.4: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:56.68 -15:22:51.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4153 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:48.04 -14:01:23.9: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:48.04 -14:01:23.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3911 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:39.93 -14:09:23.4: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:52:39.93 -14:09:23.4: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:39.93 -14:09:23.4: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4568 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:01:04.91 -20:13:24.4: 15.06 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:30.75 -15:20:23.0: 15.06 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:03.61 -21:58:49.0: 14.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:08.75 -14:25:49.2: 15.01 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:44.78 -16:44:40.7: 15.05 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:50.74 -15:32:31.5: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:01:04.91 -20:13:24.4: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:04.91 -20:13:24.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3850 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:42.55 -22:00:58.4: 15.04 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:51:08.75 -14:25:49.2: 14.97 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:08.75 -14:25:49.2: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.4947 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:44.78 -16:44:40.7: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:50.74 -15:32:31.5: 15.21 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:44.78 -16:44:40.7: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3870 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:50.74 -15:32:31.5: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4803 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:30.75 -15:20:23.0: 14.81 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:30.75 -15:20:23.0: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3290 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:03.61 -21:58:49.0: 14.78 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:03.61 -21:58:49.0: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2761 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:42.55 -22:00:58.4: 14.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:42.55 -22:00:58.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3817 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:49.02 -14:20:21.1: 14.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:03.31 -22:13:28.0: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:01:01.37 -22:04:20.2: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:49.02 -14:20:21.1: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:49.02 -14:20:21.1: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5465 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:46:12.98 -15:06:03.7: 14.97 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:20.11 -21:12:59.8: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:03.31 -22:13:28.0: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:03.31 -22:13:28.0: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2976 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:01:01.37 -22:04:20.2: 14.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:46:12.98 -15:06:03.7: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:08.48 -13:58:06.4: 15.11 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:12.98 -15:06:03.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4859 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:01.37 -22:04:20.2: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2949 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:20.11 -21:12:59.8: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:19.39 -16:53:43.9: 14.75 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:20.11 -21:12:59.8: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3290 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:08.48 -13:58:06.4: 15.24 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:08.48 -13:58:06.4: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.5535 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:19.39 -16:53:43.9: 14.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:19.39 -16:53:43.9: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5346 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:49:54.43 -19:23:24.4: 14.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:49:54.43 -19:23:24.4: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:10:55.33 -20:56:57.6: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:54.43 -19:23:24.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5538 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:19:05.58 -21:03:23.4: 14.62 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:46:49.11 -21:11:05.4: 14.94 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:02.30 -19:56:19.0: 14.48 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:10:55.33 -20:56:57.6: 15.14 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:55.33 -20:56:57.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5124 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:19:05.58 -21:03:23.4: 14.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:05.58 -21:03:23.4: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4626 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:30.10 -21:32:42.3: 14.84 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:02.30 -19:56:19.0: 14.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:46:49.11 -21:11:05.4: 15.16 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:02.30 -19:56:19.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4876 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:49.11 -21:11:05.4: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5183 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:30.10 -21:32:42.3: 15.18 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:30.10 -21:32:42.3: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4927 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:11.11 -21:45:50.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:11.11 -21:45:50.3: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out78369.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08129.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77295.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79732.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81743.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73591_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 73591_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73594_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 73594_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73596_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 73596_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73599_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 73599_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73600_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 73600_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73616_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 73616_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:54.64 -21:58:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73828_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 73828_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:56.72 -20:23:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73976_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 73976_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74662_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 74662_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74990_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 74990_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:59.00 -18:30:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76450_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 76450_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77081_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 77081_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77295_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
Preparing report for the candidate 77295_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77414_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 77414_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77563_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 77563_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77697_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 77697_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77789_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 77789_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77829_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 77829_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:56.18 -18:59:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78369_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 78369_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:56.17 -19:43:21.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.67, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.65)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.398 6245684031019855488 242.98439619773 -19.72313212306 14.0327 12.7912 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.398#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78579_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 78579_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78639_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 78639_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78658_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 78658_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78674_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 78674_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:37.95 -14:50:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78834_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 78834_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78953_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 78953_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79447_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 79447_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79658_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 79658_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79691_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 79691_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79732_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
Preparing report for the candidate 79732_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79753_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 79753_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80077_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 80077_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80330_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 80330_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:36.39 -14:44:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80753_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 80753_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80781_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 80781_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:16.42 -17:19:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80856_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 80856_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80916_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 80916_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81006_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81006_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81162_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81162_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81182_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81182_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81294_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81294_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81306_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81306_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81480_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81480_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81569_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81569_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81649_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81649_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81671_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81671_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81686_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81686_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81692_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81692_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81740_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81740_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81743_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
Preparing report for the candidate 81743_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81745_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81745_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81749_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81749_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81802_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81802_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81817_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81817_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81819_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81819_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81841_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81841_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81961_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 81961_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82033_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82033_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82043_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82043_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82099_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82099_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82110_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82110_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82132_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82132_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82142_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82142_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82158_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82158_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82164_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82164_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82180_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82180_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:21.46 -22:12:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82187_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82187_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82201_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82201_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82240_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82240_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82329_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82329_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82447_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82447_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82450_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82450_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82505_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82505_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82506_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82506_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82619_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82619_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82645_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82645_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82733_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82733_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82782_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82782_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82908_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 82908_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22030_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 22030_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:44.14 -19:21:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07980_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 07980_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:46.50 -21:49:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34137_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 34137_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:06.87 -17:23:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09608_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 09608_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.93 -21:31:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 17884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.59 -20:06:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46468_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 46468_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.95 -16:36:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28147_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177
The candidate 28147_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-58_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0177 did not pass the final checks