This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2396 2461213.7396 11.54 16:21:24.82 -08:17:47.3
5.74862 28.06014 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona 0 1 1 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:24.82 -08:17:47.3: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:24.82 -08:17:47.3: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7396,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2396 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2396 2461213.7396 12.00 16:30:11.36 -13:00:04.9
3.04061 23.49493 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 0 0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:11.36 -13:00:04.9: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:11.36 -13:00:04.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7396,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2396 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2396 2461213.7396 12.30 16:41:01.54 -14:40:10.3
3.32645 20.39150 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.119 Althaea 0 0 0 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:01.54 -14:40:10.3: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:01.54 -14:40:10.3: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7396,12.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2396 12.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2396 2461213.7396 12.96 16:48:03.17 -12:16:41.7
6.46191 20.42140 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.412 Elisabetha 1 1 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:48:03.17 -12:16:41.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:48:03.17 -12:16:41.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7396,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2396 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2396 2461213.7396 13.69 16:40:07.20 -12:04:07.2
5.42821 22.11678 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.740 Cantabia 0 -0 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:07.20 -12:04:07.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:07.20 -12:04:07.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7396,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2396 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2396 2461213.7396 13.80 16:11:35.35 -12:47:30.0
0.08023 27.16011 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.512 Taurinensis -0 -0 0 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:35.35 -12:47:30.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:35.35 -12:47:30.0: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7396,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2396 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2396 2461213.7396 14.59 16:12:59.06 -05:30:51.9
6.87621 31.40040 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1723 Klemola 1 1 1 14.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:59.06 -05:30:51.9: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:59.06 -05:30:51.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7396,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2396 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461213.73994263 22.06.2026 05:45:21.043 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7843
Objects passed selection criteria: 7841
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7421.75
Average stars matched: 7282.25 (98.1204 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113624 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 01:21:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461213.73994263 22.06.2026 05:45:21.043 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 63171
Objects passed selection criteria: 63049
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60255.5
Average stars matched: 58283.8 (96.7277 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 165336 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 01:23:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461213.73930407
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:17.034 -09:57:32.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:17.034 -09:57:32.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0484 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.344 -09:58:13.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.344 -09:58:13.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0327 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:17.034 -09:57:32.00
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:14.344 -09:58:13.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01590 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.T9bFAWYyq9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yFDQbBhHRZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o2EEHLDXT8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ks95KU2HiW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4570 deg, Dec -15.5991 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5208 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4041 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.9003 to 252.4983 deg, Dec -15.5992 to -4.3253 deg
Loaded 5222 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4215 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.T9bFAWYyq9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=0, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8107 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8113 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=229 n_q2=245 n_q3=218 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.118
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yFDQbBhHRZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=0, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8133 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=234 n_q2=244 n_q3=214 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o2EEHLDXT8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=408, bad_region=0, passed=6715
Got 6715 stars (including 6302 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6715 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6567 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=223 n_q2=254 n_q3=215 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Ks95KU2HiW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=418, bad_region=0, passed=6665
Got 6665 stars (including 6240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=222 n_q2=254 n_q3=211 n_q4=280 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.247
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.340 worst_q_ratio=1.118
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.267
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.127
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.247
reference average sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.1925
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:24.82 -08:17:47.3: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.6: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:11.36 -13:00:04.9: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:24.82 -08:17:47.3: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.6: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:11.36 -13:00:04.9: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 16:21:24.82 -08:17:47.3: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=11.5446 delta=2.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.46 -08:07:31.6: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8853 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20516.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20529.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 20516_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.87 -14:41:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20522_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.38 -06:11:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20529_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 20529_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.49 -07:42:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:21:24.82 -08:17:47.3
16:30:11.36 -13:00:04.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:17.034 -09:57:32.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:17.034 -09:57:32.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0484 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:14.344 -09:58:13.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.938 -09:59:23.16
Second-epoch image center 16:17:14.344 -09:58:13.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0327 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:17:17.034 -09:57:32.00
Second-epoch second image center 16:17:14.344 -09:58:13.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01590 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LIFNunNgaK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9BpVi0uLmc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xZ1fO3g8Xw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3Ddo3tNqpv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8525 to 252.4884 deg, Dec -15.6149 to -4.1928 deg
Loaded 5302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3766 out of 4287 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4287 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8754 to 252.4982 deg, Dec -15.6070 to -4.1798 deg
Loaded 5296 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3783 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
2.0 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LIFNunNgaK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66487
Got 66487 stars (including 63074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65344 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=231 n_q2=251 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9BpVi0uLmc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66529
Got 66529 stars (including 63096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=233 n_q2=248 n_q3=220 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xZ1fO3g8Xw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2410, bad_region=42, passed=54451
Got 54451 stars (including 51916 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54451 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=227 n_q2=254 n_q3=216 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3Ddo3tNqpv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2371, bad_region=35, passed=55473
Got 55473 stars (including 52968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54436 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54441 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54440 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=223 n_q2=257 n_q3=210 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-44-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_011058_TTUQ1b1x1_2926867_9ytC5eqN/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:48.93 -08:00:29.1: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:09.11 -07:24:43.5: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:05.41 -06:57:15.8: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:21.73 -12:36:08.5: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:44:19.51 -08:21:45.6: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:38.33 -09:14:09.3: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:54.49 -07:32:27.8: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:07:44.90 -04:57:25.0: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:21.73 -12:36:08.5: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:05.41 -06:57:15.8: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:48.93 -08:00:29.1: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:44:19.51 -08:21:45.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:54.49 -07:32:27.8: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:38.33 -09:14:09.3: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:48.93 -08:00:29.1: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1978 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:19.51 -08:21:45.6: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7293 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:09.11 -07:24:43.5: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:54.49 -07:32:27.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2365 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:21.73 -12:36:08.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2511 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:07:44.90 -04:57:25.0: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:38.33 -09:14:09.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9483 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:09.11 -07:24:43.5: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5863 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:05.41 -06:57:15.8: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2883 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:44.90 -04:57:25.0: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3897 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:48:03.17 -12:16:41.7: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:01.54 -14:40:10.3: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:15.9: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:35.35 -12:47:30.0: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:48:03.17 -12:16:41.7: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:01.54 -14:40:10.3: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:59.28 -14:38:19.2: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:07.20 -12:04:07.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:38.53 -12:27:32.4: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:15.9: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:15.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5997 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:35.35 -12:47:30.0: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:59.28 -14:38:19.2: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:59.28 -14:38:19.2: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4570 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:07.20 -12:04:07.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:38.53 -12:27:32.4: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:38.53 -12:27:32.4: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8625 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.46 -12:08:22.1: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.75 -09:50:37.8: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:39.07 -08:42:26.8: 13.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.46 -12:08:22.1: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:39.07 -08:42:26.8: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.75 -09:50:37.8: 13.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.46 -12:08:22.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0095 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:39.07 -08:42:26.8: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0749 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:48.75 -09:50:37.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0467 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:16.33 -11:32:05.6: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:16.33 -11:32:05.6: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:16.33 -11:32:05.6: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1843 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:25.43 -11:01:28.3: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:17:59.93 -12:34:59.8: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:32.86 -14:21:58.7: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:36.44 -15:07:07.3: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:37:27.61 -10:59:48.7: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:25.43 -11:01:28.3: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:32.86 -14:21:58.7: 14.79 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:25.43 -11:01:28.3: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3717 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:32.86 -14:21:58.7: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4350 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:17:59.93 -12:34:59.8: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:59.93 -12:34:59.8: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4217 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:36.44 -15:07:07.3: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:36.44 -15:07:07.3: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3291 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:36.73 -13:06:05.7: 14.64 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:37:27.61 -10:59:48.7: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:27.61 -10:59:48.7: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2355 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:36.73 -13:06:05.7: 14.52 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:36.73 -13:06:05.7: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4585 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:47:09.28 -07:44:16.2: 15.17 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:52.29 -13:18:44.0: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:13.40 -13:17:09.6: 14.93 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:41.47 -13:38:21.9: 14.50 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:52.29 -13:18:44.0: 14.56 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:47:09.28 -07:44:16.2: 14.81 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:52.29 -13:18:44.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5871 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:09.28 -07:44:16.2: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5410 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:41.47 -13:38:21.9: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:41.47 -13:38:21.9: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5667 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:49:54.57 -12:20:22.3: 14.89 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:13.40 -13:17:09.6: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:13.40 -13:17:09.6: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5929 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:49:54.57 -12:20:22.3: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:54.57 -12:20:22.3: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5175 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:12:59.06 -05:30:51.9: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:12:59.06 -05:30:51.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:54:58.23 -07:34:32.3: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:30.89 -12:02:52.8: 15.37 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:54:58.23 -07:34:32.3: 15.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:58.23 -07:34:32.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7289 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:54:16.44 -11:21:02.8: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:30.89 -12:02:52.8: 15.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:30.89 -12:02:52.8: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6028 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:00.72 -11:16:50.2: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:24:46.66 -13:22:50.4: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:54:16.44 -11:21:02.8: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.12 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:16.44 -11:21:02.8: ref_mag=15.12 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6973 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:00.72 -11:16:50.2: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:00.72 -11:16:50.2: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6931 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:24:46.66 -13:22:50.4: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:46.66 -13:22:50.4: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6095 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:05.13 -13:27:29.0: 14.87 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:52:42.09 -09:15:59.8: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:05.13 -13:27:29.0: 14.62 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:05.13 -13:27:29.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5171 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:52:42.09 -09:15:59.8: 15.13 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:42.09 -09:15:59.8: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8455 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:03.60 -13:36:10.7: 15.06 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:00.16 -05:30:39.3: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:21.37 -15:13:30.8: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:03.60 -13:36:10.7: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:03.60 -13:36:10.7: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7260 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:00.16 -05:30:39.3: 15.38 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:21.37 -15:13:30.8: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:00.16 -05:30:39.3: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6713 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:21.37 -15:13:30.8: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5557 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:28:12.81 -06:09:44.3: 14.80 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:41:36.24 -14:34:06.5: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:28:12.81 -06:09:44.3: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:45:54.37 -08:22:11.2: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:12.81 -06:09:44.3: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6818 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:41:36.24 -14:34:06.5: 14.85 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:36.24 -14:34:06.5: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7132 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:32.23 -12:58:39.6: 15.24 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:43.38 -11:44:45.8: 14.67 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:45:54.37 -08:22:11.2: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:54.37 -08:22:11.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7149 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:32.23 -12:58:39.6: 15.12 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:32.23 -12:58:39.6: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6315 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:43.38 -11:44:45.8: 14.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:43.38 -11:44:45.8: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7449 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:45.62 -09:48:11.3: 15.40 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:20:09.41 -09:59:57.9: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:10.01 -06:12:46.0: 14.99 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:45.62 -09:48:11.3: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:45.62 -09:48:11.3: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6195 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:20:09.41 -09:59:57.9: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:09.41 -09:59:57.9: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8135 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:48.47 -10:40:03.3: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:28:29.07 -15:06:05.3: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:10.01 -06:12:46.0: 15.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:10.01 -06:12:46.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7702 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:48.47 -10:40:03.3: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:48.47 -10:40:03.3: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6956 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:28:29.07 -15:06:05.3: 15.11 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:29.07 -15:06:05.3: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8211 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:44:25.58 -11:53:30.1: 14.96 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:30:39.29 -13:12:33.2: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:44:25.58 -11:53:30.1: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:25.58 -11:53:30.1: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6661 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:30:39.29 -13:12:33.2: 15.19 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:39.29 -13:12:33.2: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8310 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82610.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82691.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82694.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82960.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82520_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82523_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82530_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82533_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:18.16 -06:32:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82535_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82535_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82540_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82540_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82541_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82541_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:32:12.53 -15:05:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82555_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82555_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.79 -08:17:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82560_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82560_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:11.35 -13:00:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82575_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 82575_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82610_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 82610_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82630_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82630_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:41.20 -11:02:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82645_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82645_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82648_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82648_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82676_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82676_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:47.03 -11:44:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82683_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82683_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:52.07 -10:03:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 82691_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82694_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 82694_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82713_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82713_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82753_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82753_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82758_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82758_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82779_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82779_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:48.81 -06:41:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82790_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82790_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82833_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82833_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:13.86 -06:26:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82835_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82835_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:37.00 -11:28:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82863_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82863_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:26.39 -06:56:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82876_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82876_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82887_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82887_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82890_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82890_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82893_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82893_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82896_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82896_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82903_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82903_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82921_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82921_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82922_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82922_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82944_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82944_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82950_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82950_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82957_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82957_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82960_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 82960_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82969_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82969_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82975_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82975_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82978_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 82978_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:35.87 -10:42:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83004_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83004_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83026_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83026_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83028_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83028_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83029_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83029_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83038_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83038_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83052_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83052_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83058_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83058_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83060_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83060_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83079_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83079_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83084_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83084_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83087_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83087_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83088_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83088_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83093_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83093_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83127_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83127_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83128_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83128_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83129_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83129_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83157_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83157_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83181_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83181_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83184_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83184_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83187_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 83187_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.83 -06:46:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 06268_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:50.36 -06:11:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.26 -09:46:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 48353_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:41.86 -14:41:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52307_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:13.65 -13:57:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-45-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
