This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2426 2461213.7426 12.39 15:40:35.66 +05:37:17.4
12.57097 44.41713 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.660 Crescentia -0 -0 0 12.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:40:35.66 +05:37:17.4: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:40:35.66 +05:37:17.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2426* 15 40 35.66 +05 37 17.4 12.4 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7426,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2426 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2426 2461213.7426 13.32 15:26:50.81 +07:14:16.5
11.83076 48.16075 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.304 Olga -0 -0 0 13.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:26:50.81 +07:14:16.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:26:50.81 +07:14:16.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2426* 15 26 50.81 +07 14 16.5 13.3 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7426,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2426 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2426 2461213.7426 14.83 15:43:31.75 +06:42:07.0
14.39488 44.38078 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 3.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.781 Kartvelia -1 1 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:43:31.75 +06:42:07.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:43:31.75 +06:42:07.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2426* 15 43 31.75 +06 42 07.0 14.8 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461213.7426,14.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260622.2426 14.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
First image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Last image: 2461213.74282683 22.06.2026 05:49:30.238 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6298
Objects passed selection criteria: 6293
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6145.5
Average stars matched: 5586.75 (90.908 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113052 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 01:06:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
First image: 2461171.77913396 11.05.2026 06:41:47.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Last image: 2461213.74282683 22.06.2026 05:49:30.238 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 186
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 39017
Objects passed selection criteria: 38955
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 37464
Average stars matched: 34046.5 (90.8779 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 143488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 01:08:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461213.74236167
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.177 +06:01:23.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.177 +06:01:23.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0245 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.500 +06:01:03.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.500 +06:01:03.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:40.177 +06:01:23.95
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.500 +06:01:03.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00581 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BuSezxbi58
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DFpXmOJ1X3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.60yESiDFTK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y9ya6MtXzZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec +0.7206 to +11.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec 0.7206 to 11.2696 deg
Loaded 4612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3905 out of 4067 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4067 out of 9347 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.701400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.701400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec +0.7206 to +11.2696 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4677 to 239.3571 deg, Dec 0.7206 to 11.2696 deg
Loaded 4612 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3905 out of 4067 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4067 out of 9347 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8606 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4675 to 239.3569 deg, Dec +0.7513 to +11.2730 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4675 to 239.3569 deg, Dec 0.7513 to 11.2730 deg
Loaded 4602 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3919 out of 4066 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4066 out of 8606 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
15.3 mag. Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BuSezxbi58 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=545, bad_region=2397, passed=9347
Got 9347 stars (including 6538 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9347 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=281 n_q2=209 n_q3=293 n_q4=193 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DFpXmOJ1X3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=477, bad_region=1743, passed=8606
Got 8606 stars (including 6465 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8606 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7016 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=329 n_q2=157 n_q3=327 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.075
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.60yESiDFTK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=1375, passed=6848
Got 6848 stars (including 5166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6848 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5600 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=324 n_q2=164 n_q3=330 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y9ya6MtXzZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=401, bad_region=1410, passed=6856
Got 6856 stars (including 5114 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5576 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5572 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.367 n_q1=320 n_q2=164 n_q3=328 n_q4=166 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.101
ref2=Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.075
new1=fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.092
new2=fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.104
reference average sigma_overall=0.3695 worst_q_ratio=1.088
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22217_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22217_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:35.42 +02:06:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22221_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 22221_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:42.65 +02:07:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.177 +06:01:23.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.177 +06:01:23.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0245 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Image size: 936.9'x623.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:40.500 +06:01:03.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.591 +06:00:11.90
Second-epoch image center 15:25:40.500 +06:01:03.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:40.177 +06:01:23.95
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:40.500 +06:01:03.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00581 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lb7eolUT0s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lXpJXAhYHG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xaqVyZvhyY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d2CTtGLApo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits and wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 52266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec +0.7180 to +11.2709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec 0.7180 to 11.2709 deg
Loaded 4623 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4071 out of 52266 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.577800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.577800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.01
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 52266 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec +0.7180 to +11.2709 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4564 to 239.3740 deg, Dec 0.7180 to 11.2709 deg
Loaded 4623 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3684 out of 4071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4071 out of 52266 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 48109 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.4676 to 239.3758 deg, Dec +0.7481 to +11.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.4676 to 239.3758 deg, Dec 0.7481 to 11.2767 deg
Loaded 4608 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3712 out of 4078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4078 out of 48109 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
15.4 mag. Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lb7eolUT0s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2645, bad_region=10206, passed=52251
Got 52251 stars (including 40121 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43515 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43514 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43514 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=287 n_q2=203 n_q3=295 n_q4=188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lXpJXAhYHG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2468, bad_region=6756, passed=48100
Got 48100 stars (including 39466 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=323 n_q2=172 n_q3=316 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.185
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xaqVyZvhyY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1690, bad_region=5088, passed=38665
Got 38665 stars (including 32280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.8 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=322 n_q2=165 n_q3=325 n_q4=164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.104
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d2CTtGLApo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1771, bad_region=5050, passed=38946
Got 38946 stars (including 32544 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38946 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34274 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=323 n_q2=169 n_q3=322 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits -region wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-48-50_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_010423_TTUQ2b1x1_2488220_vk53hwaf/wcs_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ser-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:40:35.66 +05:37:17.4: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:41:43.13 +05:07:57.4: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:10:50.00 +04:23:25.3: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:26:50.81 +07:14:16.5: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:41:43.13 +05:07:57.4: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:10:50.00 +04:23:25.3: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:43.13 +05:07:57.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3389 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:40:35.66 +05:37:17.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:50.00 +04:23:25.3: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6142 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:26:50.81 +07:14:16.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:28:04.02 +09:45:25.4: 14.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:28:04.02 +09:45:25.4: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:28:04.02 +09:45:25.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3451 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:43:31.75 +06:42:07.0: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:33:58.15 +02:29:29.8: 15.37 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:43:31.75 +06:42:07.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_01-41-47_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0289.fits at 15:07:33.69 +10:02:48.5: 15.32 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:33:58.15 +02:29:29.8: 15.28 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:58.15 +02:29:29.8: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9529 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-08-33_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:07:33.69 +10:02:48.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:07:33.69 +10:02:48.5: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.1545 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out39911.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75000.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75402.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74951_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74951_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74954_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74954_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74958_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74958_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74963_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74963_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74969_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74969_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74970_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 74970_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74972_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74972_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74983_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74983_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74988_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74988_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74989_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74989_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74992_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74992_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74998_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 74998_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75000_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 75000_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75012_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75012_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75013_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75013_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75017_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75017_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75021_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75021_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75022_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75022_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75024_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75024_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75029_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75029_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75034_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75034_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75035_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75035_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75040_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75040_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75043_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75043_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75046_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75046_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75053_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75053_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75056_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75056_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75059_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75059_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75064_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75064_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75069_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75069_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75076_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75076_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75078_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75078_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75084_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75084_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75092_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75092_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75093_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75093_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75094_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75094_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75095_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75095_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75098_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75098_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75105_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75105_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75106_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75106_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75113_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75113_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75114_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75114_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75118_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75118_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75119_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75119_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75121_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75121_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75123_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75123_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75125_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75125_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75127_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75127_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75129_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75129_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75132_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75132_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75133_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75133_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75141_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75141_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75142_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75142_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75152_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75152_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75156_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75156_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75158_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75158_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75163_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75163_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75165_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75165_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75167_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75167_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75175_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75175_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75176_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75176_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75177_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75177_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75181_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75181_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75182_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75182_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75183_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75183_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75189_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75189_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75191_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75191_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75199_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75199_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75200_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75200_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75204_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75204_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75207_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75207_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75208_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75208_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75212_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75212_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75213_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75213_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75214_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75214_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75219_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75219_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75226_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75226_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75232_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75232_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75233_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75233_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75236_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75236_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75239_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75239_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75240_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75240_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75242_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75242_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75244_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75244_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75245_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75245_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75248_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75248_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75250_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75250_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75252_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75252_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75255_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75255_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75275_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75275_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75278_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75278_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75280_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75280_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75285_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75285_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75291_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75291_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75300_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75300_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75308_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75308_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75314_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75314_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75322_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75322_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75331_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75331_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75345_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75345_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75350_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75350_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75364_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75364_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75366_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75366_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75371_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75371_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75382_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75382_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75384_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75384_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75388_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75388_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75402_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
Preparing report for the candidate 75402_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75404_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75404_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75414_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75414_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75430_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75430_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75439_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75439_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75452_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75452_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75460_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75460_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75477_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75477_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75501_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 75501_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73754_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 73754_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39911_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 39911_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:07:33.69 +10:02:48.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.621 1168018559466315904 226.89139571065 +10.04684791727 14.7463 14.3566 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.621#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68319_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 68319_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68611_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 68611_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73995_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191
The candidate 73995_fd_Ser-03-Q2b1x1_2026-06-22_00-49-30_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0191 did not pass the final checks