This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.57 11:01:39.24 +61:17:50.7
143.61651 51.19416 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:01:39.24 +61:17:50.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:01:39.24 +61:17:50.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:01:39.24 +61:17:50.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 11 01 39.24 +61 17 50.7 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.40 11:15:17.62 +58:38:11.1
144.25095 54.33113 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:15:17.62 +58:38:11.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:15:17.62 +58:38:11.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:15:17.62 +58:38:11.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 11 15 17.62 +58 38 11.1 14.4 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.77 13:00:58.98 +65:05:28.0
121.29946 52.00687 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 1.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 13:00:58.98 +65:05:28.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 13:00:58.98 +65:05:28.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 13:00:58.98 +65:05:28.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.70 12:40:30.44 +57:21:54.4
125.85307 59.70110 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:40:30.44 +57:21:54.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:40:30.44 +57:21:54.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:40:30.44 +57:21:54.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 12 40 30.44 +57 21 54.4 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.85 12:55:13.57 +61:02:04.6
122.10987 56.08759 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:55:13.57 +61:02:04.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:55:13.57 +61:02:04.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:55:13.57 +61:02:04.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 12 55 13.57 +61 02 04.6 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.90 12:31:12.28 +63:18:43.5
126.76413 53.66536 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 0.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:31:12.28 +63:18:43.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:31:12.28 +63:18:43.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:31:12.28 +63:18:43.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.78 12:53:53.71 +62:44:44.4
122.44889 54.38028 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:53:53.71 +62:44:44.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:53:53.71 +62:44:44.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:53:53.71 +62:44:44.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 12 53 53.71 +62 44 44.4 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.89 12:53:49.88 +60:02:22.0
122.38199 57.08625 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.5" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:53:49.88 +60:02:22.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:53:49.88 +60:02:22.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:53:49.88 +60:02:22.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 12 53 49.88 +60 02 22.0 14.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.78 11:18:06.71 +66:15:04.8
136.80097 48.28670 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:18:06.71 +66:15:04.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:18:06.71 +66:15:04.8: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:18:06.71 +66:15:04.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 11 18 06.71 +66 15 04.8 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.89 11:15:24.42 +61:03:11.0
141.76983 52.42037 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:15:24.42 +61:03:11.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:15:24.42 +61:03:11.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:15:24.42 +61:03:11.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 11 15 24.42 +61 03 11.0 14.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.89 12:35:13.28 +60:24:05.6
126.57006 56.61200 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:35:13.28 +60:24:05.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:13.28 +60:24:05.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:13.28 +60:24:05.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 12 35 13.28 +60 24 05.6 14.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.92 11:21:04.13 +61:24:24.5
140.52152 52.52544 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:21:04.13 +61:24:24.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:21:04.13 +61:24:24.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:21:04.13 +61:24:24.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 11 21 04.13 +61 24 24.5 14.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 22.2344 2461213.7344 14.98 11:47:45.26 +57:12:09.2
139.15712 57.87439 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:47:45.26 +57:12:09.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: M3 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:47:45.26 +57:12:09.2: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:47:45.26 +57:12:09.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 22.2344* 11 47 45.26 +57 12 09.2 15.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461213.7344,14.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260622.2344 14.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
First image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Last image: 2461213.73455130 22.06.2026 05:37:35.232 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7409
Objects passed selection criteria: 7394
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6328.75
Average stars matched: 6131 (96.8754 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 01:01:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
First image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Last image: 2461213.73455130 22.06.2026 05:37:35.232 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 278
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 37385
Objects passed selection criteria: 37267
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33094.2
Average stars matched: 31761 (95.9714 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 137696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Sun Jun 21 14:44:16 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-107-g3b0f95a5
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 22 01:03:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461213.73416313
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:30.601 +62:00:30.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71
Second-epoch image center 12:00:30.601 +62:00:30.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0526 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:30.412 +62:00:30.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71
Second-epoch image center 12:00:30.412 +62:00:30.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0522 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:30.601 +62:00:30.58
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:30.412 +62:00:30.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00038 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00038 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JEkHZBE2Q1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W67C0U5C0r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.72jhur05Bd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6hgyGYfIdC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4535 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4535 deg
Loaded 6571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3978 out of 4192 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4192 out of 7332 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.897150
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.897150
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4535 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.4298 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4535 deg
Loaded 6571 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3978 out of 4192 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4192 out of 7332 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9754 to 198.4299 deg, Dec +55.3321 to +67.4949 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9754 to 198.4299 deg, Dec 55.3321 to 67.4949 deg
Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3981 out of 4179 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4179 out of 7282 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.2 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JEkHZBE2Q1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=0, passed=7332
Got 7332 stars (including 6822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7227 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=226 n_q2=229 n_q3=256 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W67C0U5C0r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=0, passed=7282
Got 7282 stars (including 6779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7172 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=228 n_q2=229 n_q3=253 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.72jhur05Bd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=337, bad_region=1, passed=5415
Got 5415 stars (including 5072 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5371 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.242 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.249 n_q1=229 n_q2=283 n_q3=218 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6hgyGYfIdC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, bad_region=1, passed=5422
Got 5422 stars (including 5089 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5422 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5379 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.221 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=228 n_q2=284 n_q3=220 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.170
ref2=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.258
new1=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits sigma_overall=0.267 worst_q_ratio=1.064
new2=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.044
reference average sigma_overall=0.3825 worst_q_ratio=1.214
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20535_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20535_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02750_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 02750_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 01679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:30.601 +62:00:30.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71
Second-epoch image center 12:00:30.601 +62:00:30.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0526 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:30.412 +62:00:30.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.732 +62:00:23.71
Second-epoch image center 12:00:30.412 +62:00:30.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0522 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:30.601 +62:00:30.58
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:30.412 +62:00:30.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00038 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00038 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zy6O34cLln
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5LHFMMqkkK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4ZdwqcdHz4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YzIaagz4vS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec +55.2262 to +67.4863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec 55.2262 to 67.4863 deg
Loaded 6640 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3750 out of 4197 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4197 out of 37333 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.792850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.792850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec +55.2262 to +67.4863 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9761 to 198.6760 deg, Dec 55.2262 to 67.4863 deg
Loaded 6640 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3750 out of 4197 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4197 out of 37333 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9755 to 198.6753 deg, Dec +55.2659 to +67.4949 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9755 to 198.6753 deg, Dec 55.2659 to 67.4949 deg
Loaded 6626 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3751 out of 4193 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4193 out of 37494 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 245 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.1 pix UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Zy6O34cLln (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1765, bad_region=9, passed=37315
Got 37315 stars (including 35474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36727 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=215 n_q2=233 n_q3=264 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5LHFMMqkkK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1739, bad_region=9, passed=37476
Got 37476 stars (including 35663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37047 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=215 n_q2=232 n_q3=263 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4ZdwqcdHz4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=899, bad_region=42, passed=29279
Got 29279 stars (including 28290 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.259 n_q1=226 n_q2=285 n_q3=220 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YzIaagz4vS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=898, bad_region=43, passed=29284
Got 29284 stars (including 28295 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29034 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.224 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=220 n_q2=289 n_q3=225 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.044
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-22_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_004852_TTUQ1b1x1_1380104_gf2nYUtC/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:53.58 +61:33:08.5: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 13:07:46.03 +62:21:56.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:53.58 +61:33:08.5: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:35:53.58 +61:33:08.5: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4538 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 13:07:46.03 +62:21:56.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:46.03 +62:21:56.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:01:39.24 +61:17:50.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:01:39.24 +61:17:50.7: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 13:07:17.63 +61:59:16.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:15:17.62 +58:38:11.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 13:07:17.63 +61:59:16.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:17.63 +61:59:16.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 13:00:58.98 +65:05:28.0: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:04:36.96 +63:11:02.2: 14.59 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:15:17.62 +58:38:11.1: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 13:00:58.98 +65:05:28.0: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:04:36.96 +63:11:02.2: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:04:36.96 +63:11:02.2: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7181 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:40:30.44 +57:21:54.4: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:55:13.57 +61:02:04.6: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:31:12.28 +63:18:43.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:40:30.44 +57:21:54.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:55:13.57 +61:02:04.6: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:31:12.28 +63:18:43.5: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:53:53.71 +62:44:44.4: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:53:49.88 +60:02:22.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:53:53.71 +62:44:44.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:53:49.88 +60:02:22.0: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:18:06.71 +66:15:04.8: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:18:06.71 +66:15:04.8: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:15:24.42 +61:03:11.0: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:15:24.42 +61:03:11.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:13.28 +60:24:05.6: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:21:04.13 +61:24:24.5: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:47:45.26 +57:12:09.2: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:13.28 +60:24:05.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:21:04.13 +61:24:24.5: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:47:45.26 +57:12:09.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54379.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54636.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54656.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54731.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54753.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54759.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54793.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54814.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54847.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54872.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54904.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54907.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54909.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 35s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52597_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52597_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52600_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52600_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52601_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52601_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52712_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52712_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52817_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52817_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52851_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52851_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52865_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52922_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52922_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52933_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52933_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52958_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 52991_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53066_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53132_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53132_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53139_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53139_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53142_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53142_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53156_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53156_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53169_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53169_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53210_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53210_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:15:28.56 +56:59:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53242_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53295_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53322_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53322_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53328_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53328_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53408_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53408_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53441_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53441_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53447_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53457_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53531_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53531_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53536_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53536_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53551_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53551_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53579_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53579_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53605_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53605_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53607_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53607_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53625_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53625_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53633_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53633_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53644_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53644_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:43:29.25 +65:57:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53663_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53663_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53672_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53672_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:58:21.21 +61:26:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53684_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53684_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53685_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53685_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53700_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53700_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53716_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53716_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53724_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53728_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53728_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53736_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:23:14.85 +58:34:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53748_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53749_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53749_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53758_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53758_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53760_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53760_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53775_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53775_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53806_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53806_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53811_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53811_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53819_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53819_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53828_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53828_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53834_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53834_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53835_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53845_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53845_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53849_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53849_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53863_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53863_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53886_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53886_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53887_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53887_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53904_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53907_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53907_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53914_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53914_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53940_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53940_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53946_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53946_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53959_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53959_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53966_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53966_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53983_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 53983_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54006_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54006_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54010_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54010_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54011_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54011_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54012_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54012_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54018_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54018_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54033_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54033_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54044_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54044_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54051_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54051_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54060_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54060_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54085_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54085_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54099_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54099_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54112_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54112_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54123_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54123_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54133_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54133_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54142_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54142_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54143_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54143_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54161_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54161_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54165_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54165_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54167_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54167_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54175_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54175_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54181_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54181_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54184_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54184_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54190_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54190_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54192_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54192_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54193_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54193_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54204_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54204_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54214_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54214_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54225_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54225_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54229_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54229_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54234_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54234_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54237_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54237_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54238_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54238_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54239_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54239_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54251_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54251_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54253_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54253_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:46:30.15 +61:30:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54265_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54265_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54273_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54273_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54275_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54275_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54284_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54284_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54292_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54292_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54300_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54300_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:23:44.98 +60:55:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54307_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54307_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54311_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54311_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54320_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54320_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54323_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54323_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54328_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54328_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54334_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54334_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54336_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54336_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54345_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54345_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54366_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54366_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54368_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54368_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:08:13.37 +63:45:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54374_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54374_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54378_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54378_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54379_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54379_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54383_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54383_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54384_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54384_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54393_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54393_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54398_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54398_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54408_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54408_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54417_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54417_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54419_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54419_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54428_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54428_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54429_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54429_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54457_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54457_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54467_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54467_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54476_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54476_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54479_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54479_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54480_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54480_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54481_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54481_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54482_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54482_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54489_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54489_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54494_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54494_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54499_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54499_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54500_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54500_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54506_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54506_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54509_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54509_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54511_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54511_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54519_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54519_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54521_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54521_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54522_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54522_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54523_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54523_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54527_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54527_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54528_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54528_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54530_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54530_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54534_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54534_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54537_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54537_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54538_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54538_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54550_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54550_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54552_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54552_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54554_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54554_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54562_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54562_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54567_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54578_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54578_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54583_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54583_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54591_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54591_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54592_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54592_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54594_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54594_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54600_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54600_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54603_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54603_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54604_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54604_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54608_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54608_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54611_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54611_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54612_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54612_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54624_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54624_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54636_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54636_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54638_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54638_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54640_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54640_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54643_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54643_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54655_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54655_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54656_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54656_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54662_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54662_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54663_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54663_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54664_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54664_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54670_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54670_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54671_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54671_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54678_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54678_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54688_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54688_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54691_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54691_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54713_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54713_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54714_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54714_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54720_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54720_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54725_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54725_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54727_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54727_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54728_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54728_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54731_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54731_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54736_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54736_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54753_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54753_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54759_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54759_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54761_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54761_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54763_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54763_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54764_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54764_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54765_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54765_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54772_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54772_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54774_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54774_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54777_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54777_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54785_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54785_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54789_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54789_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54793_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54793_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54795_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54795_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54803_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54803_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54814_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54814_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54823_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54823_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54824_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54824_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54825_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54825_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54840_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54840_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54844_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54844_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54847_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54847_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54848_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54848_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54851_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54851_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54854_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54854_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54864_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54864_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54868_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54868_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54871_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54871_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54872_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54872_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54873_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54873_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54877_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54877_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54878_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54878_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54879_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54879_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54880_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54880_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54881_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54881_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54882_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54882_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54889_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54889_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54890_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54890_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54902_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54902_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54904_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54904_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54905_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54905_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54907_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54907_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54908_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54908_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54909_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 54909_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54917_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 54917_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20541_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 20541_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06727_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 06727_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32274_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 32274_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13410_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 13410_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-22_00-37-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
