## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
First image: 2461177.92922741 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Last  image: 2461212.92813304 21.06.2026 10:16:20.695   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 44
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 82 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  38395
Objects passed selection criteria:  38321
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 30715
Average stars matched: 27744 (90.3272 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   137240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Jun 21 05:29:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
ERROR running VaST on the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus?)

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cyg-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cyg-05-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 94075 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 94075 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.png' -> 'transient_report/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits_preview.png'

Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits


renamed 'Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.png' -> 'transient_report/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits_preview.png'

Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 463.5151
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 862.2275
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1025.8598
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 866.9694
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1028.9799
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 871.5173
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.21322
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.5699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-21T05:15:39.6151459' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-21T10:15:39.6151459' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61212.4275418404 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-21T10:15:49.5165416' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61212.4276564354 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     294.541795245043 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     37.9996166778952 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     67.8763888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     288.975277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.07922763641929 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cyg-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '19 38 11'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.5699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.5699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            18.401472 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/d_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits :)

Spent 0.741969 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/d_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.5200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-21T05:16:20.6952091' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-21T10:16:20.6952091' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61212.4280173033 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-21T10:16:30.5955210' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61212.4281318868 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     294.541795218032 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     37.9996166402566 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =               67.745 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     288.957222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.08023525409815 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cyg-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '19 38 11'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20436 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.5200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.5200004577637 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            18.401472 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/d_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits :)

Spent 0.613164 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/d_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits



fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.92765758
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits'
wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Image size: 937.1'x615.9'  15.6(deg)x10.3(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.78"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:11.210 +37:59:56.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:38:11.210 +37:59:56.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Image size: 937.2'x623.9'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:08.257 +37:59:56.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:38:11.847 +38:00:28.34
Second-epoch image center 19:38:08.257 +37:59:56.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0147 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  19:38:11.210 +37:59:56.18
Second-epoch second image center 19:38:08.257 +37:59:56.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00970 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vNXNBQwRst
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mLNzVUJYZJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6UPoMnYhoT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LgAtJkil7L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits and wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2786 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2786 deg
Loaded 29686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2058 out of 2320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2320 out of 43100 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.12

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.12

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec +32.4149 to +43.2786 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 283.8267 to 305.2530 deg, Dec 32.4149 to 43.2786 deg
Loaded 29686 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2058 out of 2320 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2320 out of 43100 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 42857 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 284.1854 to 305.7701 deg, Dec +32.4089 to +43.4261 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 284.1854 to 305.7701 deg, Dec 32.4089 to 43.4261 deg
Loaded 30422 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2455 out of 2763 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2763 out of 42857 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
 2.3 pix  Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
 15.1 mag.  Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
 15.0 mag.  fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.0 (SNR )  12.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vNXNBQwRst (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5150, passed=43100
Got 43100 stars (including 37909 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 693 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 641 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 602 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.00" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 639 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 824 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 798 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.94" 
Excluding outliers - 797 stars left (next iteration limit 702)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits N_match=797 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.710 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=5.146 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=5.087 n_q1=170 n_q2=288 n_q3=126 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.617
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mLNzVUJYZJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits' -> 'wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=5184, passed=42857
Got 42857 stars (including 37636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42857 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 939.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 939.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013053 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010442 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 669 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 610 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 556 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.16" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 601 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25770 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.06" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 669 (Dec 32.4 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 685 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.01" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 630 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.55" 
Excluding outliers - 630 stars left (next iteration limit 661)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits N_match=630 sigma_overall_arcsec=5.895 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.532 sigma_q2_arcsec=4.902 sigma_q3_arcsec=13.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=12.738 n_q1=157 n_q2=342 n_q3=49 n_q4=82 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits -region wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6UPoMnYhoT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4277, passed=36719
Got 36719 stars (including 32415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36719 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 656 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 589 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.21" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 582 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.13" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.5 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 691 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 628 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.09" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 625 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24320 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.68" 
Excluding outliers - 625 stars left (next iteration limit 640)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits N_match=625 sigma_overall_arcsec=4.834 sigma_q1_arcsec=4.090 sigma_q2_arcsec=3.888 sigma_q3_arcsec=12.681 sigma_q4_arcsec=26.977 n_q1=208 n_q2=236 n_q3=118 n_q4=63 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=5.581
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LgAtJkil7L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4379, passed=36814
Got 36814 stars (including 32402 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36814 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.89" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 612 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.87" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36017 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77" 
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.755 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.768 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.954 n_q1=197 n_q2=237 n_q3=255 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.265
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits sigma_overall=8.710 worst_q_ratio=0.617
ref2=Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits sigma_overall=5.895 worst_q_ratio=2.293
new1=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits sigma_overall=4.834 worst_q_ratio=5.581
new2=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits sigma_overall=0.755 worst_q_ratio=1.265
reference average sigma_overall=7.3025 worst_q_ratio=1.455
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits) flagged: sigma=4.834 (ref avg 7.3025), ratio=5.581 (ref avg 1.455), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 35207 high-SNR stars for plate solving
 
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ 

######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388    SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1115754.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1115754.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
  log-odds ratio 28.0868 (1.57739e+12), 12 match, 0 conflict, 40 distractors, 184 index.
  RA,Dec = (294.637,37.9808), pixel scale 5.88639 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +---------++---+----+----+----+----+----+----+----++(best)------------------++---+----------+---++---+----
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1115754.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1115754.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (294.545922, 37.998161) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (19:38:11.021, +37:59:53.381).
Field size: 15.7316 x 10.5328 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.821 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

Inserting WCS header...  '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits' -> 'fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 21 05:32 fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K Jun 21 05:32 out1115754.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits (fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01'        / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1115754.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1115754.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.665 degrees of RA,Dec (294.545,37.9973)
  log-odds ratio 120.456 (2.05702e+52), 16 match, 0 conflict, 47 distractors, 26 index.
  RA,Dec = (294.546,37.9977), pixel scale 5.95496 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +-+++++---+---++--+---++------------++----+-------------------+(best)-------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1115754.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1115754.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (294.549302, 37.998397) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (19:38:11.832, +37:59:54.230).
Field size: 15.7406 x 10.5354 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.815 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 21 05:32 fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache  12K Jun 21 05:32 out1115754.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02'        / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.3961, 950.346] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 2.19306
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 28.7459 (3.04914e+12), 7 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 382 index.
  RA,Dec = (294.55,37.9992), pixel scale 5.95455 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++--+----++-----+(best)-----------------------+--------+---------+---------------------------------------
 --> log-odds 28.7459
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 67.7462 (2.64128e+29), 15 match, 0 conflict, 27 distractors, 739 index.
  RA,Dec = (294.55,37.9992), pixel scale 5.95455 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++--++---+++---++---++--------+--------++(best)--------++--------++--------++----------+-----------------
 --> log-odds 67.7462
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 168.815 (2.06743e+73), 39 match, 0 conflict, 54 distractors, 1471 index.
  RA,Dec = (294.55,37.9992), pixel scale 5.95455 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++-++++-++++-++++---++-------+++-+-----+++-+-----++++------+++-------++---------++-------+++(best)-------
 --> log-odds 168.815
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.3961, 950.346] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 2.19306
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 28.7459 (3.04914e+12), 7 match, 0 conflict, 11 distractors, 382 index.
  RA,Dec = (294.55,37.9992), pixel scale 5.95455 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++--+----++-----+(best)-----------------------+--------+---------+---------------------------------------
 --> log-odds 28.7459
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 67.7462 (2.64128e+29), 15 match, 0 conflict, 27 distractors, 739 index.
  RA,Dec = (294.55,37.9992), pixel scale 5.95455 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++--++---+++---++---++--------+--------++(best)--------++--------++--------++----------+-----------------
 --> log-odds 67.7462
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 168.815 (2.06743e+73), 39 match, 0 conflict, 54 distractors, 1471 index.
  RA,Dec = (294.55,37.9992), pixel scale 5.95455 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: +++-++++-++++-++++---++-------+++-+-----+++-+-----++++------+++-------++---------++-------+++(best)-------
 --> log-odds 168.815
Got 6 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (294.544236, 38.001624) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (19:38:10.617, +38:00:05.848).
Field size: 15.7367 x 10.5447 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -179.822 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.new"...

renamed 'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Image size: 938.7'x626.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:38:10.364 +38:00:02.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 36719 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1220072.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=4277, passed=36719
Got 36719 stars (including 32415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36719 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30730 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.49" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 611 to 668 (Dec 32.4 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.45" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 832 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.89" 
Excluding outliers - 832 stars left (next iteration limit 865)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits N_match=832 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=2.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=2.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=2.520 sigma_q4_arcsec=3.194 n_q1=208 n_q2=236 n_q3=218 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.969
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits -region wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 improved 1st new image (fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits): sigma 4.834->3.295, ratio 5.581->0.969; keeping retry result
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: updated local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits with order-2 result

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301_astrometric_residuals.png (797 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302_astrometric_residuals.png (630 matched stars from wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 2.63 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470_astrometric_residuals.png (832 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.52 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.69 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/wcs_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:33:37.92 +39:10:30.2:  12.19 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:46:41.98 +36:41:06.5:  11.71 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:54:14.28 +40:41:46.9:  11.34 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:53:06.57 +37:17:24.6:  11.66 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:39:54.05 +35:37:48.7:  10.41 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:52:34.53 +36:49:43.2:  11.63 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:07.19 +39:20:29.9:  11.54 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:36:41.16 +39:44:09.0:  12.07 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:33:37.92 +39:10:30.2:  15.76 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:37.92 +39:10:30.2: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2180 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:46:41.98 +36:41:06.5:  12.72 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:41.98 +36:41:06.5: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0569 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:53:06.57 +37:17:24.6:  15.08 +/- 0.28  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:54:14.28 +40:41:46.9:  15.72 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:06.57 +37:17:24.6: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0964 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:39:54.05 +35:37:48.7:  10.32 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:14.28 +40:41:46.9: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2949 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:52:34.53 +36:49:43.2:  13.61 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:54.05 +35:37:48.7: ref_mag=10.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5656 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:34.53 +36:49:43.2: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6831 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:34:04.48 +40:44:06.0:  12.12 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:20:24.54 +41:17:11.9:  13.35 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:36:07.19 +39:20:29.9:  14.96 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:07.19 +39:20:29.9: ref_mag=11.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8085 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:36:41.16 +39:44:09.0:  14.34 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:41.16 +39:44:09.0: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0505 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:20:24.54 +41:17:11.9:  11.89 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:24.54 +41:17:11.9: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1303 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:34:04.48 +40:44:06.0:  15.82 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:04.48 +40:44:06.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0682 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:28:16.55 +38:59:28.0:  12.09 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:30:25.97 +36:58:35.1:  12.20 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:28:54.17 +38:14:07.9:  12.22 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:39:23.07 +36:25:28.4:  12.08 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:40:47.48 +39:42:13.9:  11.85 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:38:18.28 +37:04:25.5:  12.35 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:25:14.26 +39:39:47.1:  12.26 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:28:16.55 +38:59:28.0:  14.64 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:46:26.83 +39:16:20.8:  12.20 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:16.55 +38:59:28.0: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1317 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:30:25.97 +36:58:35.1:  12.17 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:25.97 +36:58:35.1: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1304 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:39:23.07 +36:25:28.4:  12.08 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:28:54.17 +38:14:07.9:  12.25 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:40:47.48 +39:42:13.9:  15.69 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:23.07 +36:25:28.4: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1228 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:54.17 +38:14:07.9: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1999 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:47.48 +39:42:13.9: ref_mag=11.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1822 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:29:10.31 +39:44:01.6:  12.29 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:32:37.32 +38:41:51.2:  12.34 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:25:14.26 +39:39:47.1:  15.76 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:38:18.28 +37:04:25.5:  12.60 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:14.26 +39:39:47.1: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2332 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:18.28 +37:04:25.5: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2067 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:46:26.83 +39:16:20.8:  12.09 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:26.83 +39:16:20.8: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2543 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:29:10.31 +39:44:01.6:  15.69 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:32:37.32 +38:41:51.2:  12.54 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:10.31 +39:44:01.6: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2544 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.42 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:37.32 +38:41:51.2: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2911 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:29:09.46 +36:54:33.7:  12.33 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:33:36.34 +36:12:08.4:  12.17 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:25:03.61 +36:38:07.3:  12.39 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:40:34.29 +40:21:21.7:  12.35 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits at 19:29:12.19 +39:44:54.8:  12.31 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:29:09.46 +36:54:33.7:  12.33 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:09.46 +36:54:33.7: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2881 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:33:36.34 +36:12:08.4:  12.17 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:36.34 +36:12:08.4: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1793 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:25:03.61 +36:38:07.3:  12.37 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:40:34.29 +40:21:21.7:  13.65 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits at 19:29:12.19 +39:44:54.8:  15.56 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:03.61 +36:38:07.3: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3145 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:12.19 +39:44:54.8: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2847 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:34.29 +40:21:21.7: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3025 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52211_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 52211_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.18    19:53:06.57 +37:17:25.7   2991 3582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.03    19:53:06.57 +37:17:23.5   2987 3582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52214_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 52214_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.20    19:33:37.91 +39:10:31.8   5323 2482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.24    19:33:37.93 +39:10:28.5   5319 2483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52220_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 52220_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.04    19:46:41.96 +36:41:08.0   3754 3974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.07    19:46:41.99 +36:41:05.0   3749 3974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52222_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 52222_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    11.72    20:00:08.68 +35:58:57.6   2088 4331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  20:00:08.71 +35:58:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52223_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 52223_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    11.70    19:52:34.52 +36:49:44.7   3044 3863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    11.67    19:52:34.55 +36:49:41.8   3040 3864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52227_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 52227_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    11.29    19:54:14.22 +40:41:49.1   2950 1514   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    11.30    19:54:14.34 +40:41:44.7   2946 1515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52230_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 52230_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    9.39    19:38:28.40 +33:54:24.9   4739 5673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  19:38:28.35 +33:54:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 53750_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    10.57    19:39:54.05 +35:37:50.1   4572 4625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    10.56    19:39:54.06 +35:37:47.4   4568 4626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54319_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 54319_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    10.81    19:40:29.81 +34:04:03.9   4486 5573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  19:40:29.81 +34:04:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54817_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 54817_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    11.14    19:34:55.72 +40:59:11.3   5161 1387   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  19:34:55.75 +40:59:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55157_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 55157_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    11.30    19:43:00.19 +40:43:11.1   4237 1544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  19:43:00.14 +40:43:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55802_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 55802_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    11.42    20:00:57.68 +38:54:44.6   2102 2550   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  20:00:57.64 +38:54:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56887_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 56887_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    11.77    19:36:07.07 +39:20:32.0   5031 2383   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    11.85    19:36:07.31 +39:20:27.7   5027 2384   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58133_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58133_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.05    19:36:41.10 +39:44:12.3   4965 2145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.06    19:36:41.21 +39:44:05.7   4961 2146   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58214_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58214_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.07    19:34:04.46 +40:44:07.4   5264 1538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.07    19:34:04.50 +40:44:04.6   5260 1539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58393_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58393_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.13    19:20:24.50 +41:17:13.8   6819 1159   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.13    19:20:24.59 +41:17:10.0   6815 1160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58554_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58554_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.12    19:28:16.54 +38:59:29.9   5954 2583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.14    19:28:16.56 +38:59:26.1   5949 2584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58590_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58590_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.13    19:41:10.92 +40:23:04.4   4443 1750   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  19:41:10.89 +40:23:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58755_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58755_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.13    19:30:25.98 +36:58:37.6   5721 3806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.13    19:30:25.97 +36:58:32.6   5717 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58815_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58815_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.12    19:39:22.99 +36:25:30.0   4639 4145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.12    19:39:23.15 +36:25:26.7   4634 4146   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58887_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58887_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.18    19:40:47.50 +39:42:16.4   4488 2162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.18    19:40:47.47 +39:42:11.5   4484 2163   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58906_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 58906_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.18    19:28:54.14 +38:14:09.7   5890 3041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.22    19:28:54.20 +38:14:06.1   5885 3042   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59064_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59064_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.22    19:25:14.22 +39:39:49.3   6298 2166   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.25    19:25:14.30 +39:39:44.8   6293 2167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59127_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59127_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.19    19:38:18.24 +37:04:26.9   4771 3753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.22    19:38:18.33 +37:04:24.1   4767 3754   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59141_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59141_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.21    19:46:26.77 +39:16:22.1   3824 2411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.31    19:46:26.90 +39:16:19.5   3819 2411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59265_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59265_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.25    19:29:10.25 +39:44:04.3   5839 2136   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.26    19:29:10.37 +39:43:58.9   5834 2137   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59393_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59393_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.26    19:32:37.25 +38:41:53.3   5445 2770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.33    19:32:37.40 +38:41:49.1   5440 2770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59457_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59457_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.24    19:29:09.49 +36:54:36.5   5876 3844   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.34    19:29:09.43 +36:54:30.9   5872 3845   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59478_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59478_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.23    19:33:36.28 +36:12:10.0   5343 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.14    19:33:36.40 +36:12:06.9   5338 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59497_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59497_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.29    19:29:12.17 +39:44:57.4   5835 2127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.28    19:29:12.21 +39:44:52.2   5831 2128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59541_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59541_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.30    19:40:34.24 +40:21:22.8   4517 1767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.31    19:40:34.33 +40:21:20.5   4513 1768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59718_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59718_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.42766    2461212.92766    12.29    19:25:03.69 +36:38:09.6   6377 3996   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.34    19:25:03.54 +36:38:05.0   6373 3997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59885_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 59885_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    12.28    19:48:26.67 +34:33:01.1   3497 5262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  19:48:26.65 +34:33:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08025_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471
The candidate 08025_fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 21.42813    2461212.92813    10.90    19:36:15.02 +34:23:51.7   5018 5375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits

**** FOUND  19:36:15.03 +34:23:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
  
Last  image: 2461212.92765758 21.06.2026 10:15:39.615 UTC
ERROR running VaST on the field Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt)
____ VaST output ____

--==VaST 1.0rc90==--

Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees!
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 4.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images

Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...

Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13)...  OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!

 VaST was started with the following command line: 
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits 


Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...


######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 4.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits catalog from cache
The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24.
Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-18-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1302.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 3 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.2,5.1,5.6,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex  -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.6,4.6,4.2,5.1,5.5,6.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits


Done with SExtractor!

TIMING SExtractor: 692 seconds


Matching stars between images!

No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-17T10:17:55.2483722
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-05-17T10:17:55.2483722

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-05-17T10:17:55.248
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_05-17-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_1301.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 17.05.2026 10:17:55.248 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461177.92922741 mid. exp.
The reference image star  8157.562     1.374 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  7782.561     2.277 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  7506.207     1.216 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8107.824     2.000 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8415.086     1.558 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  8443.311     1.901 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  9247.362     1.623 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  7644.653     3.701 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  7935.117     3.802 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star  7596.562     2.402 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 246486, (246486 good for image matching)
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 39
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 50577
 * rejected close to frame edge: 905
 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 17
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.

Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.30
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3  (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.9
Selected detection limit= -7.9
Final detection limit= -7.9 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)

Parameter box for transient search:    10.04.7 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 17
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    245808 * detected, using  498/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015376, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3790 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015405, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3797 
223612 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015405, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3797 
223612 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015405, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3797 
223612 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] =  -0.006
    245808 stars detected, 223612 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 167851, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 167851 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 167845 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix +0.00026
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 162631 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.30
    268682 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory:  296664 kB used, 331324 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 492294 (492294 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-21T10:15:39.6151459
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-21T10:15:39.6151459

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-06-21T10:15:39.615
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-15-39_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0470.fits
The star  8514.510     1.527 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8746.191     1.778 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7668.525     1.229 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8273.593     1.548 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9293.575     1.303 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7623.229     5.107 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8607.811     1.687 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9435.694     1.947 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7742.128     4.659 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8398.220     4.375 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 244553
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 47
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 34504
 * rejected close to frame edge: 862
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 18
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    244553 * detected, using  496/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009625, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2586 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009565, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2570 
181003 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009561, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2569 
181002 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.009561, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2569 
181002 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = 179.752
    244553 stars detected, 181002 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 127137, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 127137 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 127116 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00003*Y_pix -0.07392
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 119707 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.38
    332233 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
The transient candidate (new frame position  2073.860  4283.372 ; ref frame position:  7496.808  2088.374) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2076.177  3602.494 ; ref frame position:  7497.421  2769.238) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2076.760  3445.728 ; ref frame position:  7497.514  2926.001) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  4179.993  5250.336 ; ref frame position:  5386.490  1130.537) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2067.317  5650.204 ; ref frame position:  7497.469   721.562) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2072.555  4400.860 ; ref frame position:  7497.607  1970.884) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2067.130  5774.243 ; ref frame position:  7497.123   597.526) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2068.031  5617.854 ; ref frame position:  7496.895   753.914) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  3465.448   794.132 ; ref frame position:  6120.221  5583.499) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2065.638  6078.306 ; ref frame position:  7497.307   293.468) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  5616.248  3122.197 ; ref frame position:  3959.378  3264.802) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2086.532  1214.030 ; ref frame position:  7497.345  5157.662) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
The transient candidate (new frame position  2080.323  2646.189 ; ref frame position:  7497.391  3725.527) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst
memory:  2020960 kB used, 2020996 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 736847 (244553 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)



Processing  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-21T10:16:20.6952091
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-21T10:16:20.6952091

Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-06-21T10:16:20.695
EXPTIME = 20.000

Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_052157_TTUQ2b1x1_480595_IbowPn13/fd_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_05-16-20_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0471.fits
The star  8557.625     1.153 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8510.627     1.909 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8782.815     1.396 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7947.663     2.151 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7664.066     1.796 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8742.040     1.984 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  9290.380     1.492 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  8531.075     4.131 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7730.820     6.460 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star  7737.717     6.146 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
 * passed selection: 248071
 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 68
 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 34814
 * rejected close to frame edge: 845
 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
 * rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 15
 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0
 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
    248071 * detected, using  503/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008205, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2726 
refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008124, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2699 
236422 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008127, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2700 
236424 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008127, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2700 
236424 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
  rotation [degrees] = 179.755
    248071 stars detected, 236424 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 128583, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 128583 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 128558 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
 delta_m = -0.00003*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix +0.13418
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 121870 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.38
    343880 objects stored in memory (400000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory:  2036800 kB used, 2036836 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 984918 (248071 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 41 seconds
Done with measurements! =)

Total number of measurements 984918 (0 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory...  munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer
_____________________
########### Completed Cyg-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461212.92765758 -observatory V36
07:40:27.31 +21:20:14.7 Mercury (1.0mag)
08:47:26.15 +19:56:55.5 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:28:17.22 +18:27:07.6 Mars (1.3mag)
07:59:45.51 +21:01:33.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:42.99 +03:06:17.3 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:03:16.53 +20:34:10.1 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:45.14 +00:20:00.8 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:29.86 -23:09:48.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:32:45.35 +00:07:47.0 Moon (-10.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 21 05:29 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461212.92765758:
07:59:47.91 +21:01:24.3 Io (6.2mag)
07:59:36.61 +21:02:03.0 Europa (6.3mag)
07:59:39.04 +21:01:50.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:00:14.27 +21:00:03.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:59:16.20 +20:39:44.0 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:59:44.00 +21:01:39.7 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:58:54.38 +20:49:47.5 Elara (17.6mag)
08:02:34.45 +21:06:00.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:05:43.63 +21:04:23.8 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:33.96 +03:06:41.1 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:41.37 +03:06:30.7 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:54.45 +03:08:35.5 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:41.86 +03:06:48.0 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:53:08.60 +03:06:18.1 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 21 05:29 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461212.92765758:
17:28:44.21 -35:26:50.9 JWST
14:16:48.38 +53:56:31.9 Chandra
10:13:29.45 -57:18:11.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 21 05:29 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461212.92765758 -observatory V36
18:33:25.83 -33:31:52.9 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:06:38.76 -67:59:40.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:57.63 +32:09:00.7 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:09:30.94 +15:51:26.5 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:23:37.74 -34:02:57.7 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:08:42.49 +32:01:28.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:50:08.49 +27:00:44.0 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:39:44.83 +30:35:07.7 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:58:00.83 +04:28:57.7 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:19:27.02 +21:41:55.8 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:10.67 -11:04:56.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:07:32.22 +67:13:37.4 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:13:30.76 -08:03:10.7 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:59.95 +79:52:39.5 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:29:46.41 +64:48:27.9 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:06:48.87 +28:52:48.1 14.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:27:30.75 +14:30:26.5 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:02:25.80 +34:54:45.2 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:31:14.75 -14:54:05.9 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:18:05.72 +32:13:46.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:05.07 +51:56:15.0 17.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:59:00.07 -11:32:01.2 15.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:35:59.22 +23:04:56.5 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:20.40 +04:32:01.2 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:45:41.31 +77:32:24.4 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:22:00.46 +44:16:27.6 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:15:28.32 +00:21:29.9 16.7mag A/2026 E1
20:47:16.35 -10:08:20.5 8.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:48.37 -01:14:10.4 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:32:02.73 +27:21:02.6 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:28:10.57 +19:53:01.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:37:20.65 -05:38:33.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:26:27.40 +34:20:10.7 17.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:41:19.66 +18:43:27.4 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:48:11.09 +07:31:27.9 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:37:02.51 +30:55:13.6 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:21:38.77 +29:30:27.6 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:22:27.26 +32:21:53.2 15.4mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:13:33.54 +09:01:16.9 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:20:52.01 +20:02:21.2 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:59:44.27 +19:32:58.0 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:51:26.88 +16:45:47.6 16.3mag 141P/Machholz
06:55:08.85 +17:51:05.9 16.3mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:57:54.18 +17:20:09.0 13.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:06:34.35 -23:00:35.4 16.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:26:08.40 +28:41:22.6 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:31:48.87 +06:07:18.2 16.1mag 169P/NEAT
00:53:27.85 +04:53:27.0 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:04.89 -08:05:20.7 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:04:18.02 +34:47:10.9 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:07:27.92 +03:20:20.2 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:41:13.55 +34:39:36.2 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:59:49.46 +04:12:56.0 18.0mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:09.74 +07:28:25.8 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:18:02.38 +20:21:49.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:21:30.51 +40:43:20.7 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 21 05:29 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 21 05:29 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 21 05:29 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:36:39.654 +20:56:51.32  SN 2026pbd  2026-06-12.16 19.64
15:05:22.848 +03:01:15.01  AT 2026pbc  2026-06-12.90 19.87
18:30:43.125 +58:56:29.41  AT 2026pbb  2026-06-13.05 19.32
19:04:43.638 +44:50:50.71  AT 2026pba  2026-06-13.02 17.95
17:25:50.045 -25:10:42.38  AT 2026paz  2026-05-20.38 19.087
16:07:11.840 +36:51:33.96  AT 2026pay  2026-06-11.92 20.24
18:15:04.966 +66:58:37.08  AT 2026pax  2026-06-12.96 20.29
16:01:56.521 -14:32:58.67  AT 2026paw  2026-06-12.07 23.2245
16:00:23.973 -15:05:07.48  AT 2026pav  2026-06-08.19 21.5093
16:33:10.717 -12:09:05.55  AT 2026pau  2026-06-08.16 22.4081
16:05:44.210 -13:54:43.19  AT 2026pat  2026-06-08.16 22.7486
16:04:25.152 -13:28:56.43  AT 2026pas  2026-06-08.16 22.8457
15:57:51.437 -16:13:53.25  AT 2026par  2026-06-08.19 23.0487
16:49:55.592 -21:36:54.62  AT 2026paq  2026-05-27.39 21.9062
16:11:41.646 +16:56:18.65  AT 2026pap  2026-06-12.83 20.32
20:46:15.499 -32:19:29.95  SN 2026pao  2026-06-11.36 18.635
15:03:43.225 +02:12:54.73  AT 2026pan  2026-06-05.29 20.61
23:06:24.407 +14:31:45.25  AT 2026pam  2026-06-06.80 19.38
11:47:31.848 -25:11:15.00  AT 2026pal  2026-06-07.35 20.37
15:04:37.659 -01:15:27.46  AT 2026pak  2026-06-07.45 20.29
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 21 05:29 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Jun 21 05:26:47 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 25 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 41 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 12 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 97s (1.62 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 74s (1.23 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 89s (1.48 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 57s (0.95 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 4s (0.07 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 323s (5.38 min)
FIELD_Cyg-05-Q2b1x1: 1106s (18.43 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 1108s (18.47 min)
Finished: Sun Jun 21 05:45:15 CDT 2026