This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 12.99 04:22:17.55 +55:55:50.0
149.48233 4.34063 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J042217.50+555550.2
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.500 V 14.980 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:22:17.55 +55:55:50.0: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:22:17.55 +55:55:50.0: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042217.50+555550.2,2461212.9261,12.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042217.50+555550.2 20260621.4261 12.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 13.44 04:18:10.77 +56:10:34.8
148.90030 4.11002 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J041810.64+561035.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.429 r Y 0.143 r 2458428.87300 51.052225000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:18:10.77 +56:10:34.8: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:18:10.77 +56:10:34.8: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J041810.64+561035.6,2461212.9261,13.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J041810.64+561035.6 20260621.4261 13.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 13.10 04:23:53.16 +55:37:33.2
149.85763 4.28621 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ZTF J042352.88+553733.8
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.433 r Y 0.219 r 2458231.60800 56.957543000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:23:53.16 +55:37:33.2: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:23:53.16 +55:37:33.2: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J042352.88+553733.8,2461212.9261,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J042352.88+553733.8 20260621.4261 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 12.96 04:07:51.82 +50:36:50.1
151.60032 -0.99030 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 247667330618841856 | 04:07:51.82 +50:36:51.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=1.499+/-0.031 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:07:51.82 +50:36:50.1: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:07:51.82 +50:36:50.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.4261* 04 07 51.82 +50 36 50.1 13.0 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 247667330618841856,2461212.9261,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 247667330618841856 20260621.4261 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 12.84 04:23:10.15 +56:41:21.1
149.02651 4.96023 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J042310.19+564121.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.140 V 14.700 V 2457674.90000 95.400000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:23:10.15 +56:41:21.1: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:23:10.15 +56:41:21.1: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042310.19+564121.6,2461212.9261,12.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042310.19+564121.6 20260621.4261 12.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 13.14 04:17:32.38 +50:53:15.0
152.52809 0.25723 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J041732.43+505315.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.295 r Y 0.298 r 2458384.96810 187.362407100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:17:32.38 +50:53:15.0: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:32.38 +50:53:15.0: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.4261* 04 17 32.38 +50 53 15.0 13.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J041732.43+505315.3,2461212.9261,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J041732.43+505315.3 20260621.4261 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 12.97 04:18:28.11 +50:37:47.0
152.81320 0.17512 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 8.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J041828.11+503747.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.037 r Y 0.209 r 2458538.26700 261.338300700000 S
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:18:28.11 +50:37:47.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:18:28.11 +50:37:47.0: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.4261* 04 18 28.11 +50 37 47.0 13.0 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J041828.11+503747.7,2461212.9261,12.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J041828.11+503747.7 20260621.4261 12.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 13.41 03:36:04.64 +54:58:09.5
145.13056 -0.64399 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J033604.67+545810.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.750 r Y 0.343 r 2458346.94350 74.519395300000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:36:04.64 +54:58:09.5: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:36:04.64 +54:58:09.5: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J033604.67+545810.7,2461212.9261,13.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J033604.67+545810.7 20260621.4261 13.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.4261 2461212.9261 13.35 04:04:23.71 +51:45:52.0
150.42700 -0.49779 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ZTF J040423.74+514552.9
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.350 r Y 0.256 r 2458451.11000 40.934789600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:04:23.71 +51:45:52.0: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:04:23.71 +51:45:52.0: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.4261* 04 04 23.71 +51 45 52.0 13.3 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J040423.74+514552.9,2461212.9261,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J040423.74+514552.9 20260621.4261 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79586206 23.12.2025 07:05:52.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
First image: 2461032.79586206 23.12.2025 07:05:52.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Last image: 2461212.92641128 21.06.2026 10:13:51.935 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 26
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16796
Objects passed selection criteria: 16703
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11314.2
Average stars matched: 11163.2 (98.6654 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 122168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 05:28:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.79586206 23.12.2025 07:05:52.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
First image: 2461032.79586206 23.12.2025 07:05:52.482 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Last image: 2461212.92641128 21.06.2026 10:13:51.935 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 149
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 52 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 129212
Objects passed selection criteria: 128869
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88363
Average stars matched: 85489 (96.7475 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1895168 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 05:34:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.92587838
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits'
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:02.717 +53:57:38.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78
Second-epoch image center 04:14:02.717 +53:57:38.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0344 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:05.620 +53:58:17.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78
Second-epoch image center 04:14:05.620 +53:58:17.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0217 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:02.717 +53:57:38.23
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:05.620 +53:58:17.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01308 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XN9AFUC9q5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zaFhctwnJY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t1y6qAxrTf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WYcdu0Hl6Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3546 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3546 deg
Loaded 11456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7296 out of 8078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8078 out of 19395 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.971400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.971400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3546 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0381 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3546 deg
Loaded 11456 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7296 out of 8078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8078 out of 19395 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0380 to 78.9590 deg, Dec +47.7038 to +59.3646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0380 to 78.9590 deg, Dec 47.7038 to 59.3646 deg
Loaded 11458 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7227 out of 8034 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8034 out of 17364 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XN9AFUC9q5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1810, passed=19395
Got 19395 stars (including 17553 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19395 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=191 n_q2=230 n_q3=231 n_q4=309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zaFhctwnJY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1704, passed=17364
Got 17364 stars (including 15626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17080 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=195 n_q2=235 n_q3=232 n_q4=301 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t1y6qAxrTf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, passed=4488
Got 4488 stars (including 4273 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=280 n_q2=152 n_q3=275 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WYcdu0Hl6Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=191, passed=4318
Got 4318 stars (including 4125 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=300 n_q2=134 n_q3=290 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.168
ref2=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.205
new1=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.455 worst_q_ratio=1.165
new2=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.216
reference average sigma_overall=0.4055 worst_q_ratio=1.1865
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:40.38 +48:23:31.8: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:53.37 +48:53:57.1: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:40.62 +49:00:41.3: 10.34 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:50.58 +48:51:31.6: 9.53 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:32.54 +49:17:60.0: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:30.43 +49:14:12.1: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:50.32 +48:58:00.7: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:21.05 +49:03:11.5: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:25.94 +48:16:34.2: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:57.78 +49:20:11.2: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:53.37 +48:53:57.1: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:40.62 +49:00:41.3: 10.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:21.05 +49:03:11.5: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:40.38 +48:23:31.8: 9.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:50.58 +48:51:31.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:25.94 +48:16:34.2: 11.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:50.58 +48:51:31.6: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:32.54 +49:17:60.0: 10.27 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:40.62 +49:00:41.3: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0366 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:53.37 +48:53:57.1: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5901 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.72 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:21.05 +49:03:11.5: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8632 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.26 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:40.38 +48:23:31.8: ref_mag=9.72 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0222 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:25.94 +48:16:34.2: ref_mag=11.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.0633 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:32.54 +49:17:60.0: ref_mag=10.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5931 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:30.43 +49:14:12.1: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:50.32 +48:58:00.7: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:30.43 +49:14:12.1: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7924 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:50.32 +48:58:00.7: ref_mag=10.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6659 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:57.78 +49:20:11.2: 10.69 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:57.78 +49:20:11.2: ref_mag=10.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1050 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20498_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20498_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:09.00 +48:44:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20520_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20520_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20527_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20527_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20531_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20536_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20536_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20539_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20539_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20541_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20541_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20544_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20544_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20563_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20563_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20565_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20565_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 14829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:33.19 +50:37:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02928_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 02928_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.37 +57:38:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03783_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 03783_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.38 +56:10:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12712_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 12712_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:45.09 +51:43:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:02.717 +53:57:38.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78
Second-epoch image center 04:14:02.717 +53:57:38.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0344 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Image size: 942.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:05.620 +53:58:17.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.100 +53:59:32.78
Second-epoch image center 04:14:05.620 +53:58:17.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0217 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:02.717 +53:57:38.23
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:05.620 +53:58:17.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01308 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Up5XZVrPbK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j5gBtFP4aR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wMdRpwFx0H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vav4WgQiD6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 146998 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3589 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3589 deg
Loaded 11494 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5947 out of 8185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8185 out of 146998 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.830400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.830400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 146998 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec +47.6967 to +59.3589 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9350 to 78.9584 deg, Dec 47.6967 to 59.3589 deg
Loaded 11494 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5947 out of 8185 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8185 out of 146998 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 140191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9805 to 78.9618 deg, Dec +47.6961 to +59.3674 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9805 to 78.9618 deg, Dec 47.6961 to 59.3674 deg
Loaded 11490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 8203 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8203 out of 140191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 92 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Up5XZVrPbK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=16000, passed=146960
Got 146960 stars (including 130714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 146960 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144690 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 144691 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=203 n_q2=223 n_q3=241 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.j5gBtFP4aR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=14593, passed=140144
Got 140144 stars (including 125315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 138116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.550 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.429 n_q1=205 n_q2=224 n_q3=237 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wMdRpwFx0H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1912, passed=34636
Got 34636 stars (including 32668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34636 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=280 n_q2=147 n_q3=288 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vav4WgQiD6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1655, passed=34268
Got 34268 stars (including 32553 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013094 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010476 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=294 n_q2=128 n_q3=296 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0450.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_051441_TTUQ1b1x1_3144646_Yp7NKaJj/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:40.39 +48:23:31.8: 9.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:50.59 +48:51:31.6: 9.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:21.06 +49:03:11.5: 10.74 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:53.38 +48:53:57.1: 10.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:40.63 +49:00:41.3: 10.33 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:57.79 +49:20:11.1: 10.71 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:30.43 +49:14:12.1: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:50.33 +48:58:00.7: 10.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:50.59 +48:51:31.6: 9.52 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:40.39 +48:23:31.8: 9.72 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:40.39 +48:23:31.8: ref_mag=9.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0709 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.52 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:50.59 +48:51:31.6: ref_mag=9.52 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1543 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:53.38 +48:53:57.1: 10.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.15 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:53.38 +48:53:57.1: ref_mag=10.15 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6739 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:40.63 +49:00:41.3: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:21.06 +49:03:11.5: 10.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:40.63 +49:00:41.3: ref_mag=10.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1608 delta=-0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.74 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:21.06 +49:03:11.5: ref_mag=10.74 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9661 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:57.79 +49:20:11.1: 10.68 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:30.43 +49:14:12.1: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.70 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:57.79 +49:20:11.1: ref_mag=10.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2129 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:30.43 +49:14:12.1: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8819 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:52:30.08 +49:22:26.1: 11.01 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:50.33 +48:58:00.7: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:25.95 +48:16:34.2: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.24 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:50.33 +48:58:00.7: ref_mag=10.24 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7756 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:52:30.08 +49:22:26.1: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:30.08 +49:22:26.1: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5957 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:25.95 +48:16:34.2: 11.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.25 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:25.95 +48:16:34.2: ref_mag=11.25 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1781 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:43:28.55 +48:33:18.2: 9.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:07.24 +48:47:24.2: 11.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:44:52.14 +48:31:20.7: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:03.44 +48:56:34.0: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:46:13.28 +48:46:46.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:45.70 +48:57:05.2: 11.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:43:28.55 +48:33:18.2: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:43:28.55 +48:33:18.2: ref_mag=9.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4097 delta=-1.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:29.20 +49:12:05.7: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:44:52.14 +48:31:20.7: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:07.24 +48:47:24.2: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:52.14 +48:31:20.7: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8025 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:07.24 +48:47:24.2: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5533 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:03.44 +48:56:34.0: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:03.44 +48:56:34.0: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7971 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:36.01 +49:05:21.6: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:46:13.28 +48:46:46.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:13.28 +48:46:46.7: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:11.61 +49:16:48.2: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:45.70 +48:57:05.2: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:45.70 +48:57:05.2: ref_mag=11.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7666 delta=-0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:29.20 +49:12:05.7: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:29.20 +49:12:05.7: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9007 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:54:29.78 +48:04:35.8: 9.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:36.01 +49:05:21.6: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:11.61 +49:16:48.2: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:11.61 +49:16:48.2: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9816 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:36.01 +49:05:21.6: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9321 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:14.15 +48:19:35.4: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:28.21 +49:01:00.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:54:29.78 +48:04:35.8: 9.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.45 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:29.78 +48:04:35.8: ref_mag=9.45 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.9145 delta=-2.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:32.83 +49:00:57.5: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:34.13 +48:22:53.4: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:34.13 +48:22:53.4: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:28.21 +49:01:00.1: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:34.13 +48:22:53.4: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8367 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:28.21 +49:01:00.1: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0394 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:14.15 +48:19:35.4: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:14.15 +48:19:35.4: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9552 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:32.83 +49:00:57.5: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:47.98 +48:24:48.4: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:32.83 +49:00:57.5: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2417 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:52:11.65 +48:55:56.2: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:52:01.44 +49:07:39.1: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:07.10 +48:28:01.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:04.19 +48:52:56.1: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:52:11.65 +48:55:56.2: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:11.65 +48:55:56.2: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4541 delta=-0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:04.19 +48:52:56.1: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:04.19 +48:52:56.1: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2183 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:06.30 +49:11:11.6: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:47.98 +48:24:48.4: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:47.98 +48:24:48.4: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1982 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:52:01.44 +49:07:39.1: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:07.10 +48:28:01.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:01.44 +49:07:39.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5604 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:58:16.32 +48:03:15.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:07.10 +48:28:01.4: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2213 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:06.76 +49:23:19.1: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:51:40.92 +48:51:38.3: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:58:16.32 +48:03:15.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:58:16.32 +48:03:15.0: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:06.30 +49:11:11.6: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:06.30 +49:11:11.6: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5019 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:06.76 +49:23:19.1: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:06.76 +49:23:19.1: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4865 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:48:12.38 +49:30:00.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:51:40.92 +48:51:38.3: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:40.92 +48:51:38.3: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4296 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:46:24.55 +49:00:44.3: 11.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:05.07 +48:18:25.1: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:38.94 +49:17:17.1: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:19.75 +49:02:47.0: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:46:24.55 +49:00:44.3: 11.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:48:12.38 +49:30:00.2: 9.25 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:12.38 +49:30:00.2: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:24.55 +49:00:44.3: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.8234 delta=-1.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:05.07 +48:18:25.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:05.07 +48:18:25.1: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5425 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:38.94 +49:17:17.1: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:14:04.79 +51:49:42.8: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:38.94 +49:17:17.1: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7398 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:50.82 +48:58:53.8: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:19.75 +49:02:47.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:19.75 +49:02:47.0: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7712 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:30:17.77 +55:20:57.3: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:49:26.90 +48:20:20.6: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:47:32.55 +48:21:22.2: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:50.82 +48:58:53.8: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:50.82 +48:58:53.8: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7431 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:14:04.79 +51:49:42.8: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:14:04.79 +51:49:42.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0798 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:49:26.90 +48:20:20.6: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:30:17.77 +55:20:57.3: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:26.90 +48:20:20.6: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6257 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:17.77 +55:20:57.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1217 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:47:32.55 +48:21:22.2: 10.65 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:54.79 +49:25:27.5: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.65 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:32.55 +48:21:22.2: ref_mag=10.65 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.8626 delta=-2.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:44:42.17 +48:21:09.6: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:31.75 +48:50:05.0: 13.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:54.79 +49:25:27.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:54.79 +49:25:27.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8924 delta=-0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 05:11:51.37 +57:22:13.6: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:56:14.27 +57:39:57.3: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:44:42.17 +48:21:09.6: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:31.75 +48:50:05.0: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:31.75 +48:50:05.0: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9347 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:50:17.73 +49:08:25.8: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:42.17 +48:21:09.6: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0038 delta=-0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 05:11:51.37 +57:22:13.6: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:56:14.27 +57:39:57.3: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:51.37 +57:22:13.6: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0166 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:56:14.27 +57:39:57.3: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.4407 delta=-0.69 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:50:17.73 +49:08:25.8: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:17.73 +49:08:25.8: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0341 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:18:10.77 +56:10:34.8: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:22:17.55 +55:55:50.0: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:22:17.55 +55:55:50.0: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:18:10.77 +56:10:34.8: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:18:10.77 +56:10:34.8: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4308 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:22:17.55 +55:55:50.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9862 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:40:32.99 +56:12:53.4: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:23:53.16 +55:37:33.2: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:07:51.82 +50:36:50.1: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:40:32.99 +56:12:53.4: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:23:10.15 +56:41:21.1: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:32.99 +56:12:53.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0671 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:07:51.82 +50:36:50.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:23:53.16 +55:37:33.2: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:07:51.82 +50:36:50.1: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9427 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:23:53.16 +55:37:33.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0883 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:23:10.15 +56:41:21.1: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:23:10.15 +56:41:21.1: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7849 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:17:32.38 +50:53:15.0: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:32.38 +50:53:15.0: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:17:32.38 +50:53:15.0: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1381 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:18:28.11 +50:37:47.0: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:30:30.27 +57:04:19.0: 13.81 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 03:36:04.64 +54:58:09.5: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:36:04.64 +54:58:09.5: 14.43 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 03:36:04.64 +54:58:09.5: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4129 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:18:28.11 +50:37:47.0: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:18:28.11 +50:37:47.0: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9724 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:30:30.27 +57:04:19.0: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:30.27 +57:04:19.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3789 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-05-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0354.fits at 04:04:23.71 +51:45:52.0: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:04:23.71 +51:45:52.0: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:04:23.71 +51:45:52.0: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3501 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122411.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out125870.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out136167.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33855.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out42517.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45321.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49433.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out58903.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 39s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 13s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167405_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167405_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:07.50 +49:46:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167408_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167408_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:09.01 +48:44:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167432_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167432_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167438_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167438_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167451_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167451_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167453_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167453_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167459_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167459_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167470_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167470_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167480_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167480_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167481_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167481_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167505_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167505_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167515_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167515_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167523_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167523_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167533_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167533_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167545_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167545_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:05.91 +50:53:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167551_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167551_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167555_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167555_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167561_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167561_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167567_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167567_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167569_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167569_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167572_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167572_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167587_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167587_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167592_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167592_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167613_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167613_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167646_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167646_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167652_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167652_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:48.08 +54:33:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167659_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167659_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:31.19 +57:53:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167676_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167676_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:41.62 +55:40:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167689_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167689_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167698_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167698_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167705_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167705_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167719_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167719_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167720_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167720_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:39.68 +51:21:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167732_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167732_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167743_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167743_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167788_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167788_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:09.61 +50:40:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167808_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167808_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167837_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167837_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167838_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167838_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167859_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167859_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167866_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167866_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167876_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167876_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167886_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167886_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167904_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167904_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167908_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167908_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167928_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167928_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167970_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167970_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167977_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 167977_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168007_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168007_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168009_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168009_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:20.00 +56:07:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168012_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168012_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168018_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168018_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:45.29 +51:10:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168020_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168020_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168025_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168025_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168030_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168030_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:32:42.32 +55:50:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168053_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168053_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:26.67 +57:33:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168079_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168079_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 168092_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 168092_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19444_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 19444_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:29.19 +57:43:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41162_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 41162_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:28.71 +56:09:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45321_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 45321_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42517_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 42517_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83710_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 83710_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:21.98 +53:06:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66974_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 66974_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:11.00 +54:21:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 135144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:03.31 +51:41:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44543_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 44543_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:46.60 +55:55:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36362_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 36362_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49433_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 49433_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120465_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 120465_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33855_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 33855_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135982_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 135982_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:45.14 +51:43:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 121753_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:28.10 +50:40:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27290_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 27290_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.33 +56:10:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106916_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 106916_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:33.39 +49:29:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111787_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 111787_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:03.44 +50:02:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20400_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 20400_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:08.37 +57:38:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103500_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 103500_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:05.91 +49:13:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145413_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 145413_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:33.27 +48:58:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125870_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 125870_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49989_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 49989_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:29.06 +55:40:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122411_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 122411_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26856_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 26856_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121702_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 121702_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:33.19 +50:37:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58903_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 58903_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63532_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 63532_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:34:55.51 +54:34:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35380_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 35380_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:02.66 +56:38:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136167_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
Preparing report for the candidate 136167_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 111144_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:05.24 +50:00:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88840_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451
The candidate 88840_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_05-13-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0451 did not pass the final checks
