This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.3112 2461212.8112 11.70 20:01:22.67 -30:54:38.5
10.39120 -27.62367 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.455 Bruchsalia 1 0 1 11.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:01:22.67 -30:54:38.5: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:01:22.67 -30:54:38.5: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.8112,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.3112 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.3112 2461212.8112 13.53 19:52:05.85 -30:47:57.3
9.85420 -25.68746 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1304 Arosa 0 2 2 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:52:05.85 -30:47:57.3: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:52:05.85 -30:47:57.3: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.8112,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.3112 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.3112 2461212.8112 12.64 19:31:14.09 -35:18:52.3
3.67758 -22.89611 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 10.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V6519 Sgr
Type: SRA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.500 V 14.600 V 2455060.00000 119.200000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:31:14.09 -35:18:52.3: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:31:14.09 -35:18:52.3: 13.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V6519 Sgr,2461212.8112,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V6519 Sgr 20260621.3112 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
First image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Last image: 2461212.81154137 21.06.2026 07:28:27.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4718
Objects passed selection criteria: 4718
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4523
Average stars matched: 4428 (97.8996 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 04:50:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
First image: 2461172.92132706 12.05.2026 10:06:32.658 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Last image: 2461212.81154137 21.06.2026 07:28:27.174 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 139
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 44936
Objects passed selection criteria: 44859
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 43309.8
Average stars matched: 41466.2 (95.7435 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 145760 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 04:54:29 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.81083898
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Image size: 937.4'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.479 -34:01:54.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:35.479 -34:01:54.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:38.406 -34:01:05.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:38.406 -34:01:05.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:35.479 -34:01:54.68
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:38.406 -34:01:05.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01707 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4AcasVttAY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7DP4HKSaw7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2tQVHOvGV4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pzXg2kJmA5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Loaded 9543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4789 out of 4877 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4877 out of 5975 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.479900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.479900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.02
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.02
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4893 to 307.3623 deg, Dec -39.2782 to -28.4969 deg
Loaded 9543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4789 out of 4877 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4877 out of 5975 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.4891 to 307.3630 deg, Dec -39.2652 to -28.4597 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.4891 to 307.3630 deg, Dec -39.2652 to -28.4597 deg
Loaded 9574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4757 out of 4857 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4857 out of 5969 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.4 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
14.0 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4AcasVttAY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5975
Got 5975 stars (including 5580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.793 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.653 n_q1=226 n_q2=208 n_q3=301 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7DP4HKSaw7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, passed=5969
Got 5969 stars (including 5568 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5969 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.763 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.654 n_q1=227 n_q2=212 n_q3=296 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2tQVHOvGV4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=415, passed=5249
Got 5249 stars (including 4828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5249 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 231 to 309 (Dec -43.7 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5182 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 231 to 309 (Dec -43.7 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.820 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.594 n_q1=228 n_q2=204 n_q3=292 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pzXg2kJmA5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=5325
Got 5325 stars (including 4932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5263 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.879 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=227 n_q2=210 n_q3=290 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits sigma_overall=0.600 worst_q_ratio=1.322
ref2=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits sigma_overall=0.606 worst_q_ratio=1.259
new1=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.602 worst_q_ratio=1.361
new2=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits sigma_overall=0.625 worst_q_ratio=1.406
reference average sigma_overall=0.603 worst_q_ratio=1.2905
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450_astrometric_residuals.png (960 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Image size: 937.4'x625.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:35.479 -34:01:54.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:35.479 -34:01:54.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0196 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:49:38.406 -34:01:05.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:49:35.133 -34:00:44.38
Second-epoch image center 19:49:38.406 -34:01:05.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0127 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:49:35.479 -34:01:54.68
Second-epoch second image center 19:49:38.406 -34:01:05.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01707 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VPZwKLbDHY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eO5vzu0rZk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MRb5FLsoAn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mpM2xy3rdp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits and wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 50410 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Loaded 9661 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7406 out of 7913 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7913 out of 50410 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.285500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.285500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.17
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 50410 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3814 to 307.3718 deg, Dec -39.2864 to -28.4649 deg
Loaded 9661 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7406 out of 7913 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7913 out of 50410 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 50538 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.3840 to 307.3764 deg, Dec -39.2729 to -28.4534 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.3840 to 307.3764 deg, Dec -39.2729 to -28.4534 deg
Loaded 9665 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7408 out of 7932 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7932 out of 50538 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
14.2 mag. Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VPZwKLbDHY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2222, passed=50403
Got 50403 stars (including 48095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49881 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.558 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.656 n_q1=228 n_q2=208 n_q3=288 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eO5vzu0rZk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2320, passed=50535
Got 50535 stars (including 48153 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50535 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=232 n_q2=211 n_q3=287 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits -region wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MRb5FLsoAn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2140, passed=48080
Got 48080 stars (including 45860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48080 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47693 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.744 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.653 n_q1=226 n_q2=209 n_q3=286 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.199
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mpM2xy3rdp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2132, passed=48712
Got 48712 stars (including 46503 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.613 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.845 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.640 n_q1=223 n_q2=213 n_q3=285 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.370
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-27-26_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_044200_TTUQ2b1x1_2718502_tM0fXrkS/wcs_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:03:35.79 -30:17:00.7: 13.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:58:25.03 -31:43:54.7: 12.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:32:47.37 -30:42:43.0: 13.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:27:50.74 -31:06:40.4: 13.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:06:05.41 -29:44:16.4: 13.38 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:23:50.03 -33:21:34.4: 13.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:40:15.87 -30:57:54.0: 13.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:41:19.37 -36:50:49.6: 13.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:30:48.53 -32:29:40.7: 13.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:35:22.66 -37:24:59.3: 12.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:27:50.74 -31:06:40.4: 13.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:58:25.03 -31:43:54.7: 12.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:50.74 -31:06:40.4: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5191 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:23:50.03 -33:21:34.4: 13.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:25.03 -31:43:54.7: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1451 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:40:15.87 -30:57:54.0: 13.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:35:22.66 -37:24:59.3: 12.79 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:50.03 -33:21:34.4: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2962 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:15.87 -30:57:54.0: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.5159 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:22.66 -37:24:59.3: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2049 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:03:35.79 -30:17:00.7: 13.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:32:47.37 -30:42:43.0: 13.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:30:48.53 -32:29:40.7: 13.42 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:06:05.41 -29:44:16.4: 13.34 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:41:19.37 -36:50:49.6: 13.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:03:35.79 -30:17:00.7: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3934 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:47.37 -30:42:43.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5225 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:48.53 -32:29:40.7: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4277 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:05.41 -29:44:16.4: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5593 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:41:19.37 -36:50:49.6: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5844 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:32:31.97 -33:17:42.2: 13.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:29:33.78 -32:55:50.7: 12.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:18:55.94 -32:34:02.4: 12.97 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:01:22.67 -30:54:38.5: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:19:08.53 -30:26:58.3: 12.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:17:55.99 -33:41:11.0: 13.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:19:53.38 -31:43:05.5: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:33:39.96 -32:13:01.3: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:36:20.67 -30:47:17.9: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:32:31.97 -33:17:42.2: 13.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:31.97 -33:17:42.2: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3562 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:29:33.78 -32:55:50.7: 13.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:18:55.94 -32:34:02.4: 13.11 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:33.78 -32:55:50.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2737 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:01:22.67 -30:54:38.5: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:55.94 -32:34:02.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0979 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:19:08.53 -30:26:58.3: 12.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:33:39.96 -32:13:01.3: 11.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:08.53 -30:26:58.3: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6827 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:36:20.67 -30:47:17.9: 12.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:17:55.99 -33:41:11.0: 12.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:39.96 -32:13:01.3: ref_mag=11.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0871 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:20.67 -30:47:17.9: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7762 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:55.99 -33:41:11.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0194 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:19:53.38 -31:43:05.5: 12.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:53.38 -31:43:05.5: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1291 delta=-0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:29:31.21 -35:53:23.1: 13.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:29:31.21 -35:53:23.1: 13.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:31.21 -35:53:23.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.1345 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:17:12.83 -37:29:05.7: 13.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:38:29.67 -36:22:46.3: 12.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:54:44.14 -34:12:32.2: 13.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:35:44.16 -30:20:43.7: 12.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:52:05.85 -30:47:57.3: 14.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:23:54.23 -35:41:05.9: 13.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:21:41.11 -31:50:37.2: 13.44 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:10:59.14 -34:07:17.4: 13.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:38:29.67 -36:22:46.3: 12.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:38:29.67 -36:22:46.3: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3635 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:17:12.83 -37:29:05.7: 13.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:12.83 -37:29:05.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.3051 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:54:44.14 -34:12:32.2: 13.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:35:44.16 -30:20:43.7: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:44.14 -34:12:32.2: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4568 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:44.16 -30:20:43.7: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4071 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:52:05.85 -30:47:57.3: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:23:54.23 -35:41:05.9: 13.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:21:41.11 -31:50:37.2: 13.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:10:59.14 -34:07:17.4: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:54.23 -35:41:05.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5128 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:41.11 -31:50:37.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.4024 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:59.14 -34:07:17.4: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6369 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:22:46.27 -33:48:04.0: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:22:46.27 -33:48:04.0: 13.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:46.27 -33:48:04.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4810 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:35:43.75 -36:44:09.6: 13.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:18:15.08 -30:50:02.0: 14.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:17:23.18 -33:09:05.2: 13.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:27:32.96 -37:02:38.7: 13.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:21:26.52 -37:57:59.6: 13.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:25:10.70 -30:59:24.7: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:34:52.26 -32:34:15.0: 13.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:35:43.75 -36:44:09.6: 13.70 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:43.75 -36:44:09.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4962 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:18:15.08 -30:50:02.0: 13.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:15.08 -30:50:02.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5144 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:17:23.18 -33:09:05.2: 13.64 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:23.18 -33:09:05.2: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4600 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:27:32.96 -37:02:38.7: 13.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:32.96 -37:02:38.7: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4664 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:34:52.26 -32:34:15.0: 13.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:21:26.52 -37:57:59.6: 13.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:25:10.70 -30:59:24.7: 13.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:34:52.26 -32:34:15.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5188 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:26.52 -37:57:59.6: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6035 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:10.70 -30:59:24.7: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6392 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:56:35.01 -35:54:29.2: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:56:35.01 -35:54:29.2: 13.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:56:35.01 -35:54:29.2: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6576 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:29:27.52 -35:59:42.5: 14.16 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:32:55.14 -30:14:58.1: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:20:53.55 -31:53:28.3: 14.47 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:27:29.51 -36:28:44.8: 13.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:24:15.43 -34:51:40.9: 13.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:16:27.25 -34:49:49.6: 13.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 20:02:27.48 -30:31:09.3: 14.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:32:55.14 -30:14:58.1: 13.95 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:29:27.52 -35:59:42.5: 14.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:55.14 -30:14:58.1: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6799 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:29:27.52 -35:59:42.5: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6269 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:27:29.51 -36:28:44.8: 13.98 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:20:53.55 -31:53:28.3: 13.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:24:15.43 -34:51:40.9: 14.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:29.51 -36:28:44.8: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6351 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:15.43 -34:51:40.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6835 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:53.55 -31:53:28.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6436 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:16:27.25 -34:49:49.6: 13.81 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 20:02:27.48 -30:31:09.3: 13.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:27.25 -34:49:49.6: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6075 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:02:27.48 -30:31:09.3: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6870 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:25:49.00 -35:58:48.9: 14.15 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:25:49.00 -35:58:48.9: 14.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:49.00 -35:58:48.9: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6198 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:21:44.50 -30:27:46.8: 13.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:21:49.89 -33:40:47.1: 14.46 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:20:21.02 -33:17:13.0: 13.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:40:18.62 -33:13:51.9: 13.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:39:40.04 -36:21:35.0: 13.94 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:35:16.84 -30:48:24.4: 14.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:21:15.68 -36:41:56.2: 13.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:21:44.50 -30:27:46.8: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:21:49.89 -33:40:47.1: 14.54 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:44.50 -30:27:46.8: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5448 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:49.89 -33:40:47.1: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=13.7352 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:20:21.02 -33:17:13.0: 13.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:21.02 -33:17:13.0: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6871 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:40:18.62 -33:13:51.9: 13.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:39:40.04 -36:21:35.0: 14.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:18.62 -33:13:51.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7670 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:35:16.84 -30:48:24.4: 14.16 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:21:20.91 -35:07:24.0: 13.95 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:21:15.68 -36:41:56.2: 13.85 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:40.04 -36:21:35.0: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6855 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:35:16.84 -30:48:24.4: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8010 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:15.68 -36:41:56.2: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5672 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:21:20.91 -35:07:24.0: 14.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:20.91 -35:07:24.0: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6673 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:32:57.32 -32:07:29.6: 14.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:23:34.83 -36:37:58.5: 13.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:28:22.94 -30:27:43.4: 13.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:22:06.62 -33:59:19.1: 14.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:24:22.89 -33:32:00.1: 14.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:23:27.36 -37:20:24.5: 13.89 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:40:00.60 -36:35:22.6: 13.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:32:57.32 -32:07:29.6: 13.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:23:34.83 -36:37:58.5: 13.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:57.32 -32:07:29.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7587 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:34.83 -36:37:58.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5598 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:28:22.94 -30:27:43.4: 13.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:28:22.94 -30:27:43.4: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7243 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:22:06.62 -33:59:19.1: 13.99 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:24:22.89 -33:32:00.1: 13.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:06.62 -33:59:19.1: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7031 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:40:00.60 -36:35:22.6: 13.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:18:40.61 -37:05:07.0: 13.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:23:27.36 -37:20:24.5: 14.18 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:22.89 -33:32:00.1: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6310 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:00.60 -36:35:22.6: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7174 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:23:27.36 -37:20:24.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7377 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:18:40.61 -37:05:07.0: 13.69 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:40.61 -37:05:07.0: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6073 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:22:52.92 -35:21:32.6: 13.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-06-32_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0449.fits at 19:31:14.09 -35:18:52.3: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:22:52.92 -35:21:32.6: 13.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:52.92 -35:21:32.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7584 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-07-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0450.fits at 19:31:14.09 -35:18:52.3: 13.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:31:14.09 -35:18:52.3: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.6459 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13313.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64600.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64767.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64537_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64537_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64542_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64542_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64544_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64544_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64545_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64545_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64553_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64553_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64554_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64554_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64556_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64556_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64559_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64559_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64561_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64561_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64565_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64565_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64566_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64566_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64569_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64569_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64573_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64573_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64574_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64574_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64576_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64576_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64579_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64579_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64580_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64580_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64587_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64587_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64600_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
Preparing report for the candidate 64600_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64645_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64645_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:44.15 -29:54:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64681_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64681_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:31:39.83 -34:55:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64713_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64713_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64725_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64725_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64738_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64738_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64740_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64740_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64754_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64754_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64757_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64757_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64763_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64763_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64767_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
Preparing report for the candidate 64767_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64783_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64783_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64786_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64786_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64791_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64791_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64797_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64797_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64798_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64798_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64813_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64813_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64830_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64830_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64847_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64847_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64859_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64859_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64872_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64872_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64874_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64874_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64878_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64878_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64880_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64880_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64882_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64882_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64888_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64888_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64890_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64890_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64897_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64897_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64898_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64898_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64903_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64903_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64918_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64918_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64940_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64940_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64941_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64941_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64948_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64948_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64953_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64953_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64959_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64959_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64971_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64971_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64975_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64975_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64978_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64978_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64988_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64988_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64991_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64991_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64996_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 64996_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65003_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 65003_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65019_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 65019_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65035_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 65035_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65064_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 65064_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47830_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 47830_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:32:11.30 -31:32:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13313_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
Preparing report for the candidate 13313_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31259_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 31259_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.67 -29:49:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49791_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281
The candidate 49791_fd_Sgr-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-28-27_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0281 did not pass the final checks