This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.3123 2461212.8123 10.35 21:04:33.53 -27:36:41.6
18.49067 -40.09703 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.324 Bamberga 1 1 1 10.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:04:33.53 -27:36:41.6: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:04:33.53 -27:36:41.6: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.3123* 21 04 33.53 -27 36 41.6 10.3 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.8123,10.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.3123 10.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.3123 2461212.8123 13.10 21:09:39.27 -27:32:57.0
18.91238 -41.18168 galactic Mic Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.769 Tatjana -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:09:39.27 -27:32:57.0: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:09:39.27 -27:32:57.0: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.3123* 21 09 39.27 -27 32 57.0 13.1 U Mic 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.8123,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.3123 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.3123 2461212.8123 13.23 21:13:43.23 -23:51:49.1
23.95703 -41.14192 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.388 Charybdis -0 0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:13:43.23 -23:51:49.1: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:13:43.23 -23:51:49.1: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.3123* 21 13 43.23 -23 51 49.1 13.2 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.8123,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.3123 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
First image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Last image: 2461212.81268767 21.06.2026 07:30:06.215 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 3666
Objects passed selection criteria: 3666
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3576.5
Average stars matched: 3421.25 (95.6592 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 04:51:28 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
First image: 2461172.92069786 12.05.2026 10:05:38.295 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Last image: 2461212.81268767 21.06.2026 07:30:06.215 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 84
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27894
Objects passed selection criteria: 27835
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27136.8
Average stars matched: 25868.2 (95.3255 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131388 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 04:55:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.81200199
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:24.710 -25:58:38.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:24.710 -25:58:38.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0443 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:22.330 -25:59:01.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:22.330 -25:59:01.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0335 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:24.710 -25:58:38.48
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:22.330 -25:59:01.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01091 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZrNaPAeZK6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y4BxCP1fDf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YvaiAzaT2o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NeYqEZvCQh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3769 out of 4477 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.480700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.480700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.10
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.10
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7784 to 325.7646 deg, Dec -31.2632 to -20.5567 deg
Loaded 7059 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3769 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3769 out of 4477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 4783 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.3753 to 325.5913 deg, Dec -31.4689 to -20.1665 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.3753 to 325.5913 deg, Dec -31.4689 to -20.1665 deg
Loaded 7549 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3915 out of 3964 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3964 out of 4783 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.5 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
14.1 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZrNaPAeZK6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, passed=4477
Got 4477 stars (including 4173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4477 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=254 n_q2=211 n_q3=265 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.266
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y4BxCP1fDf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=288, passed=4783
Got 4783 stars (including 4491 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4783 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4694 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4696 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=270 n_q2=191 n_q3=288 n_q4=213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YvaiAzaT2o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, passed=4114
Got 4114 stars (including 3784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4041 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.641 n_q1=257 n_q2=203 n_q3=265 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.192
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NeYqEZvCQh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, passed=4175
Got 4175 stars (including 3856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4175 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4123 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4125 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.670 n_q1=255 n_q2=207 n_q3=266 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.323
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.266
ref2=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.043
new1=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits sigma_overall=0.538 worst_q_ratio=1.192
new2=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits sigma_overall=0.507 worst_q_ratio=1.323
reference average sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.1545
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:04:48.10 -25:05:45.0: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:04:33.53 -27:36:41.6: 14.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:04:48.10 -25:05:45.0: 11.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:48.10 -25:05:45.0: ref_mag=11.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2143 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:04:33.53 -27:36:41.6: 14.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20575.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20575_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 20575_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20579_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 20579_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00958_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 00958_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:40:03.10 -28:47:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
21:04:33.53 -27:36:41.6
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:24.710 -25:58:38.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:24.710 -25:58:38.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0443 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 21:07:22.330 -25:59:01.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 21:07:14.365 -25:59:56.08
Second-epoch image center 21:07:22.330 -25:59:01.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0335 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 21:07:24.710 -25:58:38.48
Second-epoch second image center 21:07:22.330 -25:59:01.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01091 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VxFUUzYwSW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CcJwe4tLKU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits &> /tmp/tmp.epmFmEYhqU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xEkWunFtYV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits and wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Loaded 7153 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5699 out of 5990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5990 out of 31558 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.303700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.303700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.05
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.25
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31558 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.7331 to 325.8993 deg, Dec -31.2690 to -20.5312 deg
Loaded 7153 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5699 out of 5990 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5990 out of 31558 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 32134 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 307.3572 to 325.6156 deg, Dec -31.4754 to -20.1015 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 307.3572 to 325.6156 deg, Dec -31.4754 to -20.1015 deg
Loaded 7617 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5799 out of 6049 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6049 out of 32134 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.4 pix Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
14.3 mag. Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VxFUUzYwSW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1200, passed=31550
Got 31550 stars (including 30312 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31550 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31241 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.592 n_q1=265 n_q2=199 n_q3=259 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CcJwe4tLKU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=976, passed=32132
Got 32132 stars (including 31113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31719 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=262 n_q2=184 n_q3=291 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits -region wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.epmFmEYhqU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=958, passed=30363
Got 30363 stars (including 29365 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30363 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29987 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.2 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.566 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.639 n_q1=263 n_q2=189 n_q3=263 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xEkWunFtYV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1028, passed=30735
Got 30735 stars (including 29668 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30735 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30471 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.596 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.666 n_q1=262 n_q2=197 n_q3=262 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.295
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-29-06_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0282.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_043557_TTUQ2b1x1_2276264_J1aKbyYX/wcs_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:51:50.33 -25:13:27.4: 13.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:12:23.90 -26:39:30.0: 12.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:41:57.17 -24:55:21.1: 13.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:53:45.56 -25:30:39.0: 13.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:09:39.27 -27:32:57.0: 14.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:54:03.22 -24:15:49.1: 13.07 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:51:34.90 -29:06:35.1: 13.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:54:28.33 -25:08:11.6: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:43:23.09 -22:18:40.6: 10.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:13:43.23 -23:51:49.1: 14.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:12:23.90 -26:39:30.0: 12.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:51:50.33 -25:13:27.4: 13.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:09:39.27 -27:32:57.0: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:41:57.17 -24:55:21.1: 13.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:51:34.90 -29:06:35.1: 13.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:43:23.09 -22:18:40.6: 10.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:54:03.22 -24:15:49.1: 12.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:50.33 -25:13:27.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4218 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:12:23.90 -26:39:30.0: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9331 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:53:45.56 -25:30:39.0: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:54:28.33 -25:08:11.6: 12.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:57.17 -24:55:21.1: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4774 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:34.90 -29:06:35.1: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6544 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:03.22 -24:15:49.1: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2080 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:23.09 -22:18:40.6: ref_mag=10.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8784 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:45.56 -25:30:39.0: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6052 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:28.33 -25:08:11.6: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9298 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:13:43.23 -23:51:49.1: 14.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:27:33.53 -29:11:56.3: 13.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:49:54.47 -29:39:08.5: 14.17 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:40:33.53 -26:46:28.2: 13.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:59:55.70 -30:06:19.0: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:44:58.71 -30:02:48.2: 13.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:14:47.93 -26:38:28.1: 13.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:44:03.43 -28:23:33.0: 14.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:42:49.66 -29:12:15.8: 14.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:40:33.53 -26:46:28.2: 13.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:33.53 -26:46:28.2: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5860 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:44:58.71 -30:02:48.2: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:14:47.93 -26:38:28.1: 13.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:42:49.66 -29:12:15.8: 13.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:58.71 -30:02:48.2: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5535 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:49.66 -29:12:15.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.4962 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:14:47.93 -26:38:28.1: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3179 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:44:03.43 -28:23:33.0: 13.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:49:54.47 -29:39:08.5: 13.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:27:33.53 -29:11:56.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:59:55.70 -30:06:19.0: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:03.43 -28:23:33.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5652 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:54.47 -29:39:08.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5355 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:27:33.53 -29:11:56.3: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.2697 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:55.70 -30:06:19.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5972 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:49:37.46 -29:39:41.2: 13.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:56:21.33 -29:33:30.1: 14.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:53:48.78 -29:33:57.2: 13.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:24:08.47 -23:19:43.2: 14.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:07:18.53 -28:44:03.8: 13.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:14:45.47 -27:58:42.5: 14.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:46:05.61 -27:57:25.8: 13.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:37:20.83 -27:18:09.0: 13.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:46:05.61 -27:57:25.8: 14.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:05.61 -27:57:25.8: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6903 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:49:37.46 -29:39:41.2: 13.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:53:48.78 -29:33:57.2: 14.29 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:07:18.53 -28:44:03.8: 13.60 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:48.78 -29:33:57.2: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.4858 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:37.46 -29:39:41.2: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7459 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:07:18.53 -28:44:03.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6117 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:24:08.47 -23:19:43.2: 14.03 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:37:20.83 -27:18:09.0: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:24:08.47 -23:19:43.2: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8194 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:56:21.33 -29:33:30.1: 13.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:20.83 -27:18:09.0: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6456 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:21.33 -29:33:30.1: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6414 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:14:45.47 -27:58:42.5: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:38:21.89 -28:03:21.3: 13.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:38:30.50 -29:31:27.9: 13.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:41:55.48 -29:11:03.7: 13.58 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:39:44.69 -29:05:07.9: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:02:13.72 -28:54:17.2: 14.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:00:47.30 -28:21:53.4: 14.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:17:03.68 -26:39:12.1: 13.68 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:38:30.50 -29:31:27.9: 14.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:41:55.48 -29:11:03.7: 13.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:30.50 -29:31:27.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6681 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:55.48 -29:11:03.7: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5661 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:02:13.72 -28:54:17.2: 14.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:00:47.30 -28:21:53.4: 14.12 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:13.72 -28:54:17.2: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8073 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:47.30 -28:21:53.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7350 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:38:21.89 -28:03:21.3: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:21.89 -28:03:21.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6527 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:39:44.69 -29:05:07.9: 13.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:17:03.68 -26:39:12.1: 13.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:44.69 -29:05:07.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7164 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:17:03.68 -26:39:12.1: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7619 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:45:39.46 -29:23:02.2: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:41:22.33 -29:25:04.1: 13.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:53:37.16 -27:20:08.8: 14.18 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:36:03.79 -29:51:41.9: 13.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:49:35.41 -29:53:45.8: 13.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 21:10:30.68 -22:26:16.1: 13.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:39:42.27 -28:49:55.2: 13.81 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:45:02.84 -29:15:48.2: 13.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:45:39.46 -29:23:02.2: 13.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:53:37.16 -27:20:08.8: 14.14 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:37.16 -27:20:08.8: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8392 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:39.46 -29:23:02.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6358 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:41:22.33 -29:25:04.1: 13.86 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:22.33 -29:25:04.1: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6261 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:49:35.41 -29:53:45.8: 14.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:35.41 -29:53:45.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7538 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:36:03.79 -29:51:41.9: 14.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:39:42.27 -28:49:55.2: 13.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:03.79 -29:51:41.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.6324 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:42.27 -28:49:55.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8354 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 21:10:30.68 -22:26:16.1: 14.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:10:30.68 -22:26:16.1: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8861 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:45:02.84 -29:15:48.2: 14.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:02.84 -29:15:48.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7124 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:43:35.23 -23:57:21.6: 14.12 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:40:14.57 -29:40:24.4: 14.17 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:38:06.66 -28:04:38.8: 13.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:35:49.63 -29:54:50.5: 13.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:45:21.49 -25:00:32.8: 14.36 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:41:13.37 -28:50:40.6: 14.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_05-05-38_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0448.fits at 20:38:19.23 -29:05:11.4: 13.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:43:35.23 -23:57:21.6: 14.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:35.23 -23:57:21.6: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9215 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:40:14.57 -29:40:24.4: 14.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.25
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:35:49.63 -29:54:50.5: 13.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:14.57 -29:40:24.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.25 new_mean_mag=13.8489 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:45:21.49 -25:00:32.8: 14.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:38:06.66 -28:04:38.8: 14.26 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:49.63 -29:54:50.5: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5805 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:21.49 -25:00:32.8: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.7552 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:06.66 -28:04:38.8: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7606 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:41:13.37 -28:50:40.6: 14.02 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:13.37 -28:50:40.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7857 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-42-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0451.fits at 20:38:19.23 -29:05:11.4: 13.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:19.23 -29:05:11.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.5144 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53209.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53114.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53125.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53060_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53060_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53062_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53064_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53065_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53067_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53069_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53078_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:04:33.53 -27:36:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53081_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53114_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 53114_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53121_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53121_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53125_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
Preparing report for the candidate 53125_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53132_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53132_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53135_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53135_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53145_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53145_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53149_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53149_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53160_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53160_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53172_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53172_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53174_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53190_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53190_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53194_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53194_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53198_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53198_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53199_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53199_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53204_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53204_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53209_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53209_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:14:45.47 -27:58:42.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.486 6790392364978814336 318.68954180933 -27.97835921105 13.1428 10.7177 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.486#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53211_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53211_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53216_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53216_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53217_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53217_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53218_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53218_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53222_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53222_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53223_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53223_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53231_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53231_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53232_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53232_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53235_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53235_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53239_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53239_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53240_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53240_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53249_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53249_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53254_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53254_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53255_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53255_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53258_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53258_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53261_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53264_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53264_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53270_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53274_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53274_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53290_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53290_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53299_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53299_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53303_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53303_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53304_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53304_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53310_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53310_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53313_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 53313_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13873_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 13873_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:43:48.89 -25:46:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04897_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283
The candidate 04897_fd_Cap-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_02-30-06_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0283 did not pass the final checks