## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78072922 22.02.2026 06:44:05.005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
First image: 2461093.78072922 22.02.2026 06:44:05.005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Last  image: 2461212.73582294 21.06.2026 05:39:25.102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6410
Objects passed selection criteria:  6403
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5747.5
Average stars matched: 5577.75 (97.0465 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112136 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Jun 21 01:10:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78072922 22.02.2026 06:44:05.005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
First image: 2461093.78072922 22.02.2026 06:44:05.005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Last  image: 2461212.73582294 21.06.2026 05:39:25.102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 121
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  31932
Objects passed selection criteria:  31843
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 28920.8
Average stars matched: 27820 (96.1939 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   133252 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sun Jun 21 01:11:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-08-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-08-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 201379 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 201379 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits_preview.png'

UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits


renamed 'UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits_preview.png'

UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 483.7856
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.3741
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1176.4452
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 504.8647
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1174.2776
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 505.8409
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.43175
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-21T00:38:47.2006076' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-21T05:38:47.2006076' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61212.2352685183 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-21T05:38:57.1004941' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61212.2353831017 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     190.587899370031 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9999162969744 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     43.1277777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     314.823055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.46116307139839 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-08'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 42 21'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29493 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29493 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            36.702936 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            25.202016 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits :)

Spent 0.701269 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-21T00:39:25.1023940' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-21T05:39:25.1023940' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61212.2357071992 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-21T05:39:35.0091061' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61212.2358218636 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     190.587899425526 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9999162851318 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     43.0341666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     314.824444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      1.4637081133052 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-08'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 42 21'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29493 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29493 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 57.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               894.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            36.702936 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            25.202016 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits :)

Spent 0.791259 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits



fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.73538426
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:35.660 +54:01:08.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66
Second-epoch image center 12:42:35.660 +54:01:08.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0317 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:34.363 +54:01:11.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66
Second-epoch image center 12:42:34.363 +54:01:11.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0292 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:42:35.660 +54:01:08.05
Second-epoch second image center 12:42:34.363 +54:01:11.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00333 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.latcUE8AYI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dQXpyzn9Nr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VnZKYT3iAC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5gVpwuRlHs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6316 to +59.4289 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6316 to 59.4289 deg
Loaded 5130 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6366 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.895950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.895950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6316 to +59.4289 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6316 to 59.4289 deg
Loaded 5130 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6366 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6336 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6315 to +59.4307 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6315 to 59.4307 deg
Loaded 5133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6336 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
 2.5 pix  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.1 (SNR )  12.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.latcUE8AYI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, passed=6366
Got 6366 stars (including 5928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=229 n_q2=251 n_q3=253 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dQXpyzn9Nr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, passed=6336
Got 6336 stars (including 5899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=228 n_q2=253 n_q3=247 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VnZKYT3iAC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=269, passed=5202
Got 5202 stars (including 4923 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5202 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=239 n_q2=256 n_q3=247 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.065
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5gVpwuRlHs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=260, passed=5215
Got 5215 stars (including 4946 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5215 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.242 n_q1=242 n_q2=252 n_q3=245 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.073
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.245
ref2=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.270
new1=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.065
new2=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.277 worst_q_ratio=1.073
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.2575
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:17:30.46 +49:45:37.8:  10.99 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:17:30.46 +49:45:37.8:  11.00 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:30.46 +49:45:37.8: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2949 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20432_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20432_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    11.30    13:17:30.49 +49:45:37.9   1235 5349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    11.29    13:17:30.44 +49:45:37.7   1233 5349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20554_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20554_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.17    11:57:36.00 +53:22:31.3   8822 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  11:57:35.99 +53:22:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02859_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 02859_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    8.82    11:58:05.59 +52:35:40.6   8822 3995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  11:58:05.59 +52:35:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:35.660 +54:01:08.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66
Second-epoch image center 12:42:35.660 +54:01:08.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0317 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:34.363 +54:01:11.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66
Second-epoch image center 12:42:34.363 +54:01:11.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0292 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:42:35.660 +54:01:08.05
Second-epoch second image center 12:42:34.363 +54:01:11.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00333 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZYCjL2oGIG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sGQqVTqKgn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xcvhmSJPMN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JuvNZ466SV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.5911 to +59.4389 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.5911 to 59.4389 deg
Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3548 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3548 out of 32060 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.52

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.52

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.5911 to +59.4389 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.5911 to 59.4389 deg
Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3548 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3548 out of 32060 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 32020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0423 to 205.0230 deg, Dec +47.5909 to +59.4403 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0423 to 205.0230 deg, Dec 47.5909 to 59.4403 deg
Loaded 5177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3222 out of 3544 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3544 out of 32020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 95 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.2 (SNR )  14.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZYCjL2oGIG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1385, passed=32036
Got 32036 stars (including 30591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32036 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=223 n_q2=243 n_q3=257 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sGQqVTqKgn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1380, passed=31995
Got 31995 stars (including 30556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31995 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=226 n_q2=243 n_q3=252 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xcvhmSJPMN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=792, passed=26237
Got 26237 stars (including 25405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26237 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=234 n_q2=259 n_q3=243 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JuvNZ466SV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=787, passed=26258
Got 26258 stars (including 25433 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26258 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=237 n_q2=257 n_q3=239 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:50:36.11 +56:41:18.2:  14.64 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:17:30.47 +49:45:37.7:  11.18 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:21:58.97 +56:04:09.2:  12.85 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:17:30.47 +49:45:37.7:  11.17 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:50:36.11 +56:41:18.2:  14.62 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:21:58.97 +56:04:09.2:  12.89 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.18 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:58.97 +56:04:09.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2573 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:30.47 +49:45:37.7: ref_mag=11.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3756 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:50:36.11 +56:41:18.2: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.8616 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:25:55.85 +54:33:47.7:  13.35 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:07:38.97 +57:39:30.3:  13.51 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:22:57.32 +54:15:22.1:  13.68 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:25:55.85 +54:33:47.7:  13.34 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:22:04.92 +55:59:21.0:  14.30 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:44:01.76 +55:29:57.1:  14.33 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:25:55.85 +54:33:47.7: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7487 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:07:38.97 +57:39:30.3:  13.47 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:38.97 +57:39:30.3: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9215 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:22:57.32 +54:15:22.1:  13.68 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:57.32 +54:15:22.1: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0011 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:22:04.92 +55:59:21.0:  14.25 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:44:01.76 +55:29:57.1:  14.30 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:04.92 +55:59:21.0: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5084 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:44:01.76 +55:29:57.1: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4016 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:58:47.77 +53:34:22.3:  14.10 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:58:47.77 +53:34:22.3:  14.09 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:58:47.77 +53:34:22.3: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5681 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:37:49.94 +58:12:02.3:  14.61 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:33:47.60 +57:07:13.6:  15.24 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:37:49.94 +58:12:02.3:  14.65 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:33:47.60 +57:07:13.6:  15.30 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.63 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:37:49.94 +58:12:02.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6761 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.27 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:33:47.60 +57:07:13.6: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6801 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52183_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52183_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    14.91    12:50:36.12 +56:41:19.9   4230 1538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.82    12:50:36.10 +56:41:16.4   4228 1539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52186_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52186_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    13.28    13:21:59.03 +56:04:08.6   1575 1516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.24    13:21:58.91 +56:04:09.8   1573 1516   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52273_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52273_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    10.64    11:50:59.58 +57:35:44.8   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52337_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52337_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    11.36    13:17:30.50 +49:45:37.8   1235 5349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    11.39    13:17:30.44 +49:45:37.7   1233 5349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52368_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    11.66    12:15:42.38 +57:00:11.0   7111 1430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:15:42.39 +57:00:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52399_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52399_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    11.83    12:19:34.43 +49:00:00.4   6881 6281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:19:34.43 +49:00:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52404_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52404_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    11.86    12:36:16.03 +50:07:46.3   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52419_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52419_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    11.95    13:17:52.00 +57:02:38.1   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52435_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52435_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.08    12:39:02.43 +51:10:40.6   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52454_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52454_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.16    12:59:47.04 +51:28:17.9   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52472_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52472_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    11.83    11:52:06.63 +53:10:15.0   9337 3591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52476_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52476_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.20    12:35:22.42 +50:22:41.4   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52522_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52522_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.45    12:43:35.97 +48:56:49.6   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52527_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52527_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.39    12:35:35.92 +58:57:14.3   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52533_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52533_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.48    12:49:52.45 +56:11:54.1   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52572_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.62    12:58:42.97 +57:51:09.9   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52574_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.61    12:49:55.97 +57:08:55.6   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52577_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52577_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.63    12:41:49.90 +56:50:18.6   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52621_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52621_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.79    12:06:33.58 +53:00:14.6   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52707_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52707_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    12.91    12:11:04.85 +50:29:07.0   7684 5354   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:11:04.92 +50:29:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52751_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52751_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.18    11:56:55.54 +49:29:45.4   9121 5868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:55.59 +49:29:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52760_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.26    12:29:24.14 +56:19:10.7   5976 1856   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:29:24.15 +56:19:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52784_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.29    11:55:23.21 +51:52:09.0   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52798_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52798_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.36    11:56:57.77 +49:29:54.0   9117 5867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:57.80 +49:29:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52811_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.35    12:25:14.29 +50:26:44.5   6318 5403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52813_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52813_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.37    12:24:08.40 +51:35:50.0   6422 4706   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:24:08.43 +51:35:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52819_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52819_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.40    13:28:53.67 +50:43:47.5   0261 4551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  13:28:53.64 +50:43:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52838_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52838_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.43    12:29:45.36 +58:23:44.9   5969 0599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:29:45.37 +58:23:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52870_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52870_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.49    12:05:22.89 +50:21:13.3   8242 5406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:05:23.08 +50:21:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52907_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52907_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.48    12:11:45.67 +50:49:21.1   7609 5152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:11:45.73 +50:49:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52916_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52916_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.73    13:26:02.80 +49:00:50.1   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52940_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52940_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.60    12:55:32.27 +56:10:10.5   3788 1809   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:55:32.29 +56:10:10.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52951_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.86    12:42:30.82 +54:43:47.0   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52955_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52955_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.72    12:22:52.54 +53:20:12.4   6533 3656   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:22:52.55 +53:20:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52984_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52984_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.47    11:56:59.88 +49:29:57.1   9113 5867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:59.94 +49:29:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 52999_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.68    13:38:30.75 +57:52:05.1   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53033_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53033_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    13.77    13:25:55.83 +54:33:48.1   1049 2336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.73    13:25:55.87 +54:33:47.3   1047 2336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53078_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.13    13:28:30.78 +50:23:13.4   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53088_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53088_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.88    12:35:20.89 +50:07:51.6   5339 5572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:35:20.88 +50:07:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53115_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53115_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    13.93    13:07:38.97 +57:39:30.5   2915 0782   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.91    13:07:38.97 +57:39:30.2   2914 0783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53151_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.89    12:38:00.83 +57:11:04.0   5281 1312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53200_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53200_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    14.06    13:22:57.38 +54:15:22.2   1269 2574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.95    13:22:57.27 +54:15:21.9   1267 2574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53215_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53215_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.34    12:32:25.41 +56:33:21.1   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53220_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53220_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.36    13:34:45.84 +55:02:09.0   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53224_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53224_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.89    13:26:40.66 +54:15:03.2   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53243_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53243_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.11    12:54:18.93 +49:13:33.5   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53273_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53273_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    13.99    12:42:30.86 +57:18:54.9   4919 1213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53293_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.14    11:58:22.97 +56:21:04.6   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53387_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.55    13:32:39.46 +52:42:15.0   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53410_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53410_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.13    12:19:55.73 +53:32:41.1   6797 3528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:19:55.73 +53:32:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53436_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53436_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    14.39    13:22:04.88 +55:59:21.1   1557 1561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.79    13:22:04.96 +55:59:21.0   1555 1561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53439_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53439_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.69    13:20:57.53 +53:54:43.7   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53468_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53468_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    14.43    12:44:01.79 +55:29:57.5   4723 2298   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.37    12:44:01.74 +55:29:56.8   4721 2298   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53470_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53470_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.26    12:21:39.34 +53:49:54.6   6640 3357   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:21:39.33 +53:49:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53482_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53482_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.26    12:11:39.46 +56:47:10.6   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53515_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.88    12:19:40.92 +54:56:42.2   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53525_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53525_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.45    12:33:35.28 +58:55:10.4   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53538_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53538_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.70    12:57:40.16 +49:45:19.1   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53551_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53551_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.50    12:29:54.03 +51:20:54.1   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53575_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53575_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.59    13:29:53.90 +52:01:49.7   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53584_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53584_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.23    11:56:24.89 +49:17:21.3   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53587_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53587_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.77    12:01:09.22 +57:16:14.6   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53591_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53591_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.64    13:06:48.37 +49:19:55.3   2233 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53609_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    14.61    12:58:47.78 +53:34:23.1   3330 3330   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.53    12:58:47.77 +53:34:21.4   3328 3331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53615_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53615_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.37    12:04:35.31 +56:26:47.6   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53626_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53626_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.31    11:55:27.04 +52:22:54.7   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53638_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53638_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.48    11:59:00.33 +49:08:34.5   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53639_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53639_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.80    13:25:28.72 +54:42:42.5   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53640_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53640_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.56    12:51:34.68 +50:31:14.8   3795 5233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53645_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53645_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.81    13:12:47.67 +50:36:36.8   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53651_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53651_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.98    11:58:52.85 +57:23:17.6   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53652_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53652_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.61    13:28:15.89 +50:52:27.5   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53655_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53655_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.93    12:04:27.19 +52:35:34.7   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53661_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53661_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.60    13:34:43.16 +54:33:22.5   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53674_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53674_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.98    12:40:16.00 +55:12:49.9   5032 2489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  12:40:16.30 +55:12:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53680_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53680_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.95    13:28:20.09 +56:52:36.3   1152 0919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53683_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53683_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.53    12:05:21.74 +52:12:43.6   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53698_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53698_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.60    13:10:40.41 +49:30:13.0   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53715_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53715_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    14.71    12:37:49.80 +58:12:03.0   5327 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.65    12:37:50.08 +58:12:01.5   5324 0698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53720_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53720_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 21.23538    2461212.73538    14.72    13:33:47.50 +57:07:12.1   0744 0665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-38-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.64    13:33:47.70 +57:07:15.1   0742 0665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53723_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53723_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.72    12:05:41.00 +49:38:57.9   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53727_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53727_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.90    13:13:35.09 +49:14:28.7   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53731_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53731_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.95    11:55:44.39 +55:48:42.7   8839 2030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53753_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.90    12:13:19.05 +57:25:16.6   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53757_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53757_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.86    12:12:45.82 +52:11:44.9   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53783_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53783_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    15.01    13:17:55.30 +49:55:54.3   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53787_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53787_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    15.03    12:15:11.24 +54:31:36.1   7203 2925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53790_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53790_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.87    12:53:21.91 +54:49:13.7   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53792_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53792_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    15.12    12:34:02.34 +56:39:44.1   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53817_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53817_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.73    12:35:52.79 +54:12:18.1   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53821_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53821_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.89    11:54:41.34 +54:38:14.0   9005 2730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53830_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53830_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.94    12:08:40.56 +56:28:15.0   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53842_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.94    12:52:58.68 +54:01:54.0   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 53846_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    14.93    13:34:15.02 +54:35:57.9   0331 2145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14065_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 14065_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 21.23582    2461212.73582    8.91    11:58:05.61 +52:35:40.6   8822 3995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010631_TTUQ1b1x1_3877360_WPxgdEDu/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-39-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits

**** FOUND  11:58:05.60 +52:35:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461212.73538426 -observatory V36
07:39:58.15 +21:23:59.4 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:46:31.31 +20:00:36.8 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:27:43.15 +18:24:56.9 Mars (1.3mag)
07:59:35.33 +21:02:01.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:40.44 +03:06:04.6 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:03:13.90 +20:34:02.8 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:44.74 +00:19:59.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:30.71 -23:09:44.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
11:22:33.01 +01:18:29.2 Moon (-10.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Jun 21 01:10 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461212.73538426:
07:59:41.55 +21:01:40.5 Io (6.2mag)
07:59:27.86 +21:02:25.8 Europa (6.3mag)
07:59:31.43 +21:02:10.1 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:00:03.25 +21:00:34.4 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:59:06.67 +20:40:09.6 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:59:35.22 +21:02:02.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:58:45.12 +20:50:17.3 Elara (17.6mag)
08:02:23.75 +21:06:35.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:05:34.01 +21:04:50.7 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:31.97 +03:06:29.6 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:40.14 +03:06:17.6 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:52.38 +03:08:23.7 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:40.19 +03:06:35.0 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:53:06.32 +03:06:07.1 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 21 01:10 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461212.73538426:
17:29:34.20 -35:30:04.1 JWST
11:55:27.00 +54:56:29.8 Chandra
08:48:24.03 -49:32:41.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 21 01:10 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461212.73538426 -observatory V36
18:33:35.51 -33:31:12.6 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:06:27.08 -67:59:40.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:53.31 +32:08:50.5 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:09:35.41 +15:51:08.5 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:21:46.05 -34:24:58.2 15.8mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:08:46.85 +32:01:10.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:49:54.50 +27:00:44.0 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:39:35.61 +30:35:35.8 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:53.96 +04:28:33.2 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:19:34.80 +21:41:59.1 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:13.84 -11:04:49.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:07:40.63 +67:13:07.0 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:13:59.24 -08:01:56.9 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:55.79 +79:55:28.6 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:29:28.48 +64:47:59.2 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:06:32.15 +28:52:00.0 14.1mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:27:38.72 +14:29:44.7 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:02:36.83 +34:51:38.0 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:31:03.22 -14:54:54.6 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:17:55.14 +32:15:42.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.68 +51:57:00.7 17.9mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:58:49.03 -11:31:21.6 15.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:35:47.96 +23:05:14.8 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:18.99 +04:32:15.4 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:46:11.05 +77:30:45.5 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:21:43.28 +44:15:45.2 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:15:23.45 +00:18:24.0 16.7mag A/2026 E1
20:46:57.06 -10:06:20.7 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:44.43 -01:13:52.2 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:31:45.10 +27:19:36.2 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:27:45.87 +19:56:30.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:37:12.47 -05:39:04.6 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:25:49.71 +34:19:45.5 17.3mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:40:51.41 +18:42:17.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:47:48.33 +07:29:18.5 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:36:25.68 +30:55:00.4 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:21:03.82 +29:29:01.8 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:21:59.00 +32:22:38.9 15.4mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:13:12.67 +09:06:08.3 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:20:32.90 +20:01:44.6 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:59:21.49 +19:32:40.8 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:50:43.47 +16:47:43.5 16.3mag 141P/Machholz
06:54:24.20 +17:51:21.1 16.2mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:57:01.01 +17:19:40.5 13.1mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:06:26.94 -23:01:55.1 16.3mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:25:28.39 +28:37:30.1 15.1mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:31:57.72 +06:02:58.4 16.1mag 169P/NEAT
00:52:57.77 +04:51:29.7 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:11.96 -08:05:27.8 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:03:52.28 +34:47:56.0 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:06:56.93 +03:15:07.3 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:40:40.24 +34:37:54.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:59:02.49 +04:03:17.7 18.0mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:13.40 +07:29:07.3 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:17:52.50 +20:22:12.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:21:11.67 +40:44:13.5 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 21 01:10 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 21 01:10 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 21 01:10 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:57:51.437 -16:13:53.25  AT 2026par  2026-06-08.19 23.0487
16:49:55.592 -21:36:54.62  AT 2026paq  2026-05-27.39 21.9062
16:11:41.646 +16:56:18.65  AT 2026pap  2026-06-12.83 20.32
20:46:15.499 -32:19:29.95  SN 2026pao  2026-06-11.36 18.635
15:03:43.225 +02:12:54.73  AT 2026pan  2026-06-05.29 20.61
23:06:24.407 +14:31:45.25  AT 2026pam  2026-06-06.80 19.38
11:47:31.848 -25:11:15.00  AT 2026pal  2026-06-07.35 20.37
15:04:37.659 -01:15:27.46  AT 2026pak  2026-06-07.45 20.29
17:48:25.754 +32:00:08.94  AT 2026paj  2026-06-12.05 19.81
21:50:53.005 -01:05:39.13  AT 2026pai  2026-06-08.43 20.366
12:25:02.669 +52:19:31.14  AT 2026pah  2026-06-03.24 19.8587
21:46:05.755 -08:58:40.30  TDE 2026pag  2026-06-03.38 19.3089
10:27:13.174 +19:29:29.02  AT 2026paf  2026-06-01.20 19.6465
22:55:52.731 -02:16:03.48  AT 2026pae  2026-06-05.45 19.7544
15:08:17.400 -12:11:26.44  SN 2026pad  2026-06-12.28 20.06
22:23:33.649 -01:35:22.74  AT 2026pac  2026-06-09.42 20.1163
16:50:53.544 -15:00:19.11  AT 2026pab  2026-06-07.24 21.56
17:27:02.076 +41:10:59.54  AT 2026paa  2026-06-07.32 20.214
18:20:18.686 +77:47:56.78  AT 2026ozz  2026-06-09.31 19.322
22:11:50.531 +22:43:04.06  AT 2026ozy  2026-06-11.18 19.472
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 21 01:10 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sun Jun 21 01:09:46 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 34s (0.57 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 44s (0.73 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 88s (1.47 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 20s (0.33 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 62s (1.03 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 4s (0.07 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 5s (0.08 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 3s (0.05 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 92s (1.53 min)
FIELD_UMa-08-Q1b1x1: 198s (3.30 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 200s (3.33 min)
Finished: Sun Jun 21 01:13:06 CDT 2026