This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2298 2461212.7298 11.54 19:25:42.23 -26:16:13.1
12.34807 -18.70519 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -0 0 0 11.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:25:42.23 -26:16:13.1: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:42.23 -26:16:13.1: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7298,11.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2298 11.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2298 2461212.7298 12.57 19:02:31.86 -27:24:12.0
9.18988 -14.36489 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.488 Kreusa -0 0 0 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:31.86 -27:24:12.0: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:31.86 -27:24:12.0: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7298,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2298 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2298 2461212.7298 12.82 19:19:32.19 -25:02:05.5
13.00003 -16.95227 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.407 Arachne -1 1 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:32.19 -25:02:05.5: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:32.19 -25:02:05.5: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7298,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2298 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2298 2461212.7298 12.31 18:50:34.27 -23:36:08.6
11.59642 -10.33981 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NX Sgr
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.300 V < 16.100 V 2425874.00000 159.090000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:34.27 -23:36:08.6: 13.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:34.27 -23:36:08.6: 13.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NX Sgr,2461212.7298,12.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NX Sgr 20260621.2298 12.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2298 2461212.7298 11.63 19:06:55.31 -27:08:37.4
9.83480 -15.15888 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.37 Fides -1 -0 1 11.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:55.31 -27:08:37.4: 14.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:55.31 -27:08:37.4: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7298,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2298 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461212.73003759 21.06.2026 05:31:05.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7311
Objects passed selection criteria: 7303
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7479.75
Average stars matched: 6515.5 (87.1085 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114556 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:55:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
First image: 2461126.96484295 27.03.2026 11:09:12.431 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Last image: 2461212.73003759 21.06.2026 05:31:05.248 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 107
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 56 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 87946
Objects passed selection criteria: 87828
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88610.2
Average stars matched: 75222 (84.8909 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1926696 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:59:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.72951578
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.499 -26:01:21.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.499 -26:01:21.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0193 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:03.257 -26:00:42.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:03.257 -26:00:42.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.499 -26:01:21.46
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:03.257 -26:00:42.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01273 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7Wvxs3ww30
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wEJSbkWZTm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pq6EmzyFIN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6TGBwnuhzK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.396850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.396850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.94
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0411 deg, Dec -31.2662 to -20.5511 deg
Loaded 13361 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6758 out of 6930 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6930 out of 8597 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9158 to 297.0872 deg, Dec -31.2660 to -20.5652 deg
Loaded 13374 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8786 out of 9184 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 9184 out of 13260 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.4 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.7Wvxs3ww30 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, passed=8597
Got 8597 stars (including 8115 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8597 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 920 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8454 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 933 stars left (next iteration limit 1028)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.732 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.621 n_q1=248 n_q2=168 n_q3=254 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wEJSbkWZTm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=984, passed=13260
Got 13260 stars (including 12254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13260 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13024 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1031)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.734 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.591 n_q1=249 n_q2=210 n_q3=220 n_q4=259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.pq6EmzyFIN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=524, passed=7214
Got 7214 stars (including 6683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7214 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 938 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 938 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=938 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.849 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.529 n_q1=244 n_q2=192 n_q3=239 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.380
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6TGBwnuhzK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=517, passed=7453
Got 7453 stars (including 6921 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7453 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7330 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.804 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=243 n_q2=186 n_q3=236 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.351
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits sigma_overall=0.654 worst_q_ratio=1.119
ref2=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits sigma_overall=0.577 worst_q_ratio=1.271
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.615 worst_q_ratio=1.380
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.595 worst_q_ratio=1.351
reference average sigma_overall=0.6155 worst_q_ratio=1.195
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532_astrometric_residuals.png (933 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.58 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (938 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23821_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 23821_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.78 -23:56:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23823_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 23823_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.68 -26:20:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23826_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 23826_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:32.92 -29:04:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23827_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 23827_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.47 -22:34:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 22031_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.30 -28:51:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Image size: 938.3'x624.9' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:01.499 -26:01:21.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:01.499 -26:01:21.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0193 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.7' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:03.257 -26:00:42.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:12:01.338 -26:00:11.86
Second-epoch image center 19:12:03.257 -26:00:42.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0111 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:01.499 -26:01:21.46
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:03.257 -26:00:42.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01273 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JUciJLRuKJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sg5hWBCIPx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mPsH4GBPnd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nnJY242Abn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.175600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.175600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.12
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 85938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8927 to 297.0514 deg, Dec -31.2795 to -20.5112 deg
Loaded 13462 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10255 out of 11603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11603 out of 85938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 145640 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.8954 to 297.0913 deg, Dec -31.2705 to -20.5526 deg
Loaded 13425 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9479 out of 11642 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11642 out of 145640 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
14.6 mag. Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JUciJLRuKJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=5805, passed=85935
Got 85935 stars (including 80016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 85935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013032 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010426 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.736 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=267 n_q2=176 n_q3=221 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sg5hWBCIPx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=13408, passed=145618
Got 145618 stars (including 131996 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 145618 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143298 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 143297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.654 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=187 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.344
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mPsH4GBPnd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=5439, passed=88770
Got 88770 stars (including 83195 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88770 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.761 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=256 n_q2=206 n_q3=200 n_q4=282 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.343
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nnJY242Abn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=5512, passed=86437
Got 86437 stars (including 80797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.776 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.533 n_q1=257 n_q2=201 n_q3=207 n_q4=281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.360
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-30-20_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_005154_TTUQ2b1x1_2530063_NMN3SOTi/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:57:35.02 -29:57:24.5: 12.96 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:48:24.78 -22:13:12.2: 13.25 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:37.59 -22:17:27.1: 13.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:08:29.18 -26:18:41.7: 13.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:57:24.68 -26:42:06.8: 12.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:46:30.88 -24:13:50.3: 12.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:53:16.10 -27:14:26.1: 12.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:42:41.70 -25:18:24.4: 12.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:57.37 -24:58:26.3: 13.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:17:58.36 -23:18:31.6: 13.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:24.68 -26:42:06.8: 13.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:57:35.02 -29:57:24.5: 13.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:48:24.78 -22:13:12.2: 13.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:08:29.18 -26:18:41.7: 13.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:48:24.78 -22:13:12.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3382 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:24.68 -26:42:06.8: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3521 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:35.02 -29:57:24.5: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4032 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:08:29.18 -26:18:41.7: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6031 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:30.88 -24:13:50.3: 13.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:41.70 -25:18:24.4: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:37.59 -22:17:27.1: 13.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:30.88 -24:13:50.3: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2649 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:41.70 -25:18:24.4: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2393 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:17:58.36 -23:18:31.6: 13.35 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:37.59 -22:17:27.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3410 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:58.36 -23:18:31.6: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2983 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:57.37 -24:58:26.3: 13.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:57.37 -24:58:26.3: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4160 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:53:16.10 -27:14:26.1: 12.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:53:16.10 -27:14:26.1: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2789 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:40.02 -26:08:04.8: 12.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:11:12.37 -26:44:23.3: 12.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:12:34.84 -23:06:40.3: 11.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:58:40.08 -24:08:47.7: 12.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:32.29 -24:22:34.5: 13.03 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:27:30.64 -22:20:25.8: 12.98 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:12.51 -29:42:36.1: 12.97 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:59:54.28 -21:50:09.1: 12.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:41.79 -27:18:05.2: 12.78 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:00:47.76 -25:06:44.9: 12.84 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:40.02 -26:08:04.8: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:40.02 -26:08:04.8: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0149 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:11:12.37 -26:44:23.3: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:11:12.37 -26:44:23.3: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0883 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:58:40.08 -24:08:47.7: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:40.08 -24:08:47.7: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8897 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:32.29 -24:22:34.5: 13.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:12:34.84 -23:06:40.3: 12.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:32.29 -24:22:34.5: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0129 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:12:34.84 -23:06:40.3: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0872 delta=-1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:59:54.28 -21:50:09.1: 13.02 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:12.51 -29:42:36.1: 12.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:41.79 -27:18:05.2: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:54.28 -21:50:09.1: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9240 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:12.51 -29:42:36.1: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.9723 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:41.79 -27:18:05.2: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8564 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:27:30.64 -22:20:25.8: 13.18 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:30.64 -22:20:25.8: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1989 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:00:47.76 -25:06:44.9: 12.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:47.76 -25:06:44.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9641 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:30:23.02 -25:09:58.6: 12.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:12.62 -27:14:51.8: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:12.99 -22:04:49.3: 12.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:56:24.14 -29:00:25.8: 12.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:25:42.23 -26:16:13.1: 14.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:41:39.42 -30:03:04.9: 12.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:55.90 -27:07:11.0: 12.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:30:23.02 -25:09:58.6: 12.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:23.02 -25:09:58.6: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0028 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:12.62 -27:14:51.8: 12.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:12.62 -27:14:51.8: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8065 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:25:42.23 -26:16:13.1: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:12.99 -22:04:49.3: 12.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:12.99 -22:04:49.3: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6914 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:56:24.14 -29:00:25.8: 12.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:24.14 -29:00:25.8: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6067 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:39.42 -30:03:04.9: 12.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:55.90 -27:07:11.0: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:39.42 -30:03:04.9: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4771 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:55.90 -27:07:11.0: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4679 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:02:31.86 -27:24:12.0: 14.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:01:30.92 -27:10:10.1: 12.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:02:31.86 -27:24:12.0: 15.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:01:30.92 -27:10:10.1: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:01:30.92 -27:10:10.1: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4803 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:19:32.19 -25:02:05.5: 14.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:46:48.53 -29:36:15.5: 13.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:19:32.19 -25:02:05.5: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:10:56.98 -28:04:24.9: 13.25 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:46:48.53 -29:36:15.5: 13.01 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:48.53 -29:36:15.5: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.9626 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:43:25.77 -24:59:02.6: 13.19 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:42:44.09 -27:32:59.3: 13.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:09:39.35 -22:39:09.4: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:10:56.98 -28:04:24.9: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:10:56.98 -28:04:24.9: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2277 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:49:14.50 -25:51:24.7: 13.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:43:25.77 -24:59:02.6: 13.19 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:43:25.77 -24:59:02.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1015 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:41:42.95 -24:51:13.4: 13.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:42:44.09 -27:32:59.3: 13.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:44.09 -27:32:59.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5318 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:09:39.35 -22:39:09.4: 13.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:09:39.35 -22:39:09.4: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6180 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:41:42.95 -24:51:13.4: 13.85 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:49:14.50 -25:51:24.7: 13.56 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:41:42.95 -24:51:13.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4973 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:14.50 -25:51:24.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4830 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 18:50:34.27 -23:36:08.6: 13.29 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 18:50:34.27 -23:36:08.6: 13.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:50:34.27 -23:36:08.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.3121 delta=1.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-27_06-09-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0532.fits at 19:06:55.31 -27:08:37.4: 14.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-05-17_04-49-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_1263.fits at 19:06:55.31 -27:08:37.4: 15.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out116892.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148348.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148426.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148451.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81015.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148158_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148158_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148159_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148159_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148176_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148176_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148178_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148178_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148191_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148191_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148197_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148197_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148200_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148200_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148213_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148213_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148222_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148222_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148225_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148225_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148226_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148226_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148231_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148231_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148239_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148239_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148245_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148245_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148255_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148255_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148258_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148258_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148260_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148260_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148264_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148264_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148269_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148269_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148272_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148272_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148273_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148273_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.74 -28:43:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148280_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148280_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148283_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148283_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148288_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148288_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148291_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148291_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148300_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148300_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148348_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 148348_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148355_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148355_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:49.39 -28:37:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148385_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148385_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:06.94 -25:53:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:56.26 -25:11:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148424_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148424_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148426_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 148426_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148432_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148432_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:53.48 -22:42:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148435_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148435_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:29.19 -26:24:59.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148451_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 148451_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148453_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148453_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:48.98 -27:20:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148456_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148456_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:50.48 -23:55:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148460_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148460_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:40.57 -25:29:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148482_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148482_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148497_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148497_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:05.90 -28:00:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148503_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148503_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:20:16.22 -28:17:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148535_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148535_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148558_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148558_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:29:42.39 -26:48:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148579_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148579_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:49.34 -23:08:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148599_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148599_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148623_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148623_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148632_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148632_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148671_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148671_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148697_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 148697_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 119392_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:05:58.40 -22:07:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 104936_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:04.54 -27:50:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 120931_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:38.50 -21:51:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 110046_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:12.65 -28:03:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 81015_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 15695_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:34.22 -28:51:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 105121_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:21.26 -28:07:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 45893_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:18.74 -25:10:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 08935_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:08.56 -29:49:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 98198_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:42.79 -23:56:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 98054_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:23.70 -26:20:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 98039_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:02.49 -22:34:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 112797_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:20.94 -22:59:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 102551_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:19.54 -24:58:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 106879_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:37.26 -25:01:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12507_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 12507_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:33.00 -29:04:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116892_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
Preparing report for the candidate 116892_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155
The candidate 101215_fd_Sgr-05-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-05_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0155 did not pass the final checks