This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2403 2461212.7403 10.40 16:07:43.32 -20:23:22.3
353.12983 22.80872 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia -0 -0 0 10.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:43.32 -20:23:22.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:43.32 -20:23:22.3: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7403,10.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2403 10.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2403 2461212.7403 11.94 16:12:48.89 -21:47:23.8
352.89835 20.98496 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 -1 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:48.89 -21:47:23.8: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:48.89 -21:47:23.8: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7403,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2403 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2403 2461212.7403 13.59 16:04:11.84 -15:29:17.8
356.47805 26.74436 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 10.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.364 Isara -1 0 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:11.84 -15:29:17.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:11.84 -15:29:17.8: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7403,13.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2403 13.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2403 2461212.7403 13.96 16:13:42.74 -16:12:52.5
357.55533 24.54874 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.358 Apollonia -1 -0 1 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:13:42.74 -16:12:52.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:13:42.74 -16:12:52.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7403,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2403 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461212.74060407 21.06.2026 05:46:18.192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7289
Objects passed selection criteria: 7267
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5861.5
Average stars matched: 5411.75 (92.327 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112552 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:52:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
First image: 2461169.81328752 09.05.2026 07:30:58.042 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Last image: 2461212.74060407 21.06.2026 05:46:18.192 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 131
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 57722
Objects passed selection criteria: 57578
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 47786
Average stars matched: 43353.2 (90.7237 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 152268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:54:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.73999681
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.195 -17:59:46.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.195 -17:59:46.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:04.274 -17:59:07.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:04.274 -17:59:07.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0211 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:01.195 -17:59:46.81
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:04.274 -17:59:07.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01647 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zo2PGZQM1M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uWxyTHs6a7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HfaFpVVsgm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.31FPsCQ43l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.710400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.710400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.98
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2486 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5891 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4657 out of 4797 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4797 out of 7602 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4577 deg, Dec -23.2541 to -12.6560 deg
Loaded 5895 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4659 out of 4800 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4800 out of 7612 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.7 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Zo2PGZQM1M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=468, passed=7602
Got 7602 stars (including 7123 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7464 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.638 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=269 n_q2=242 n_q3=233 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.300
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uWxyTHs6a7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=7612
Got 7612 stars (including 7147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7612 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.536 n_q1=271 n_q2=241 n_q3=233 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HfaFpVVsgm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=431, passed=7400
Got 7400 stars (including 6962 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7400 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7287 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7288 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.670 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.721 n_q1=218 n_q2=276 n_q3=198 n_q4=278 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.31FPsCQ43l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=419, passed=7403
Got 7403 stars (including 6973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7289 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.634 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.699 n_q1=216 n_q2=274 n_q3=203 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.342
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.491 worst_q_ratio=1.300
ref2=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.481 worst_q_ratio=1.228
new1=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=0.524 worst_q_ratio=1.375
new2=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.342
reference average sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.264
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:43.32 -20:23:22.3: 15.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:11.50 -16:55:15.4: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:00:54.80 -16:28:32.0: 12.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:57:24.51 -18:38:24.4: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:57:24.51 -18:38:24.4: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:43.32 -20:23:22.3: 15.31 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:11.50 -16:55:15.4: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:24.51 -18:38:24.4: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8959 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:00:54.80 -16:28:32.0: 12.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:11.50 -16:55:15.4: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8669 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:54.80 -16:28:32.0: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8590 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20574_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 20574_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20679_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 20679_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.93 -21:31:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20912_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 20912_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.92 -16:36:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21057_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 21057_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.56 -20:06:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21232_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 21232_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21256_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 21256_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21271_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 21271_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21284_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 21284_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:31.33 -18:38:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03712_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 03712_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.76 -18:18:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:07:43.32 -20:23:22.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:01.195 -17:59:46.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:01.195 -17:59:46.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0066 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:04.274 -17:59:07.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:59.569 -17:59:42.51
Second-epoch image center 16:00:04.274 -17:59:07.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0211 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:01.195 -17:59:46.81
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:04.274 -17:59:07.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01647 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yLw2h5xSeQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IqVs1svAlV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RKGjTTsoo1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I0qzRzq9aN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.536600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.536600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.92
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 59419 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5352 to 248.4793 deg, Dec -23.2633 to -12.6204 deg
Loaded 5923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4701 out of 5206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5206 out of 59419 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 58808 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.5351 to 248.5023 deg, Dec -23.2663 to -12.6225 deg
Loaded 5929 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4737 out of 5215 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5215 out of 58808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 73 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yLw2h5xSeQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2882, passed=59407
Got 59407 stars (including 56426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59407 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 58535 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.616 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=285 n_q2=237 n_q3=224 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IqVs1svAlV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2840, passed=58797
Got 58797 stars (including 55880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58797 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 57961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.568 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.513 n_q1=287 n_q2=240 n_q3=218 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RKGjTTsoo1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2699, passed=55275
Got 55275 stars (including 52516 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55275 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 54313 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.592 n_q1=220 n_q2=265 n_q3=211 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I0qzRzq9aN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2635, passed=54700
Got 54700 stars (including 51990 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 54700 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.616 n_q1=227 n_q2=262 n_q3=210 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_004954_TTUQ2b1x1_2235949_9VObn6I8/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:17.75 -19:35:35.1: 14.10 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:41.62 -16:05:14.9: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:17:35.63 -21:27:30.4: 13.22 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:06:21.03 -16:05:30.2: 15.38 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:14.65 -14:22:42.2: 14.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:07.55 -14:45:23.2: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:53:29.56 -16:36:57.6: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:58:10.12 -14:28:11.8: 11.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:48.89 -21:47:23.8: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:17.75 -19:35:35.1: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:17:35.63 -21:27:30.4: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:11:41.62 -16:05:14.9: 14.23 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:06:21.03 -16:05:30.2: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:17.75 -19:35:35.1: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0943 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:07.55 -14:45:23.2: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:35.63 -21:27:30.4: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2993 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:14.65 -14:22:42.2: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:41.62 -16:05:14.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2104 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:21.03 -16:05:30.2: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3792 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:07.55 -14:45:23.2: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9420 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:14.65 -14:22:42.2: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3360 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:53:29.56 -16:36:57.6: 14.49 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:29.56 -16:36:57.6: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4840 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:10.84 -14:49:21.0: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:58:10.12 -14:28:11.8: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:48.89 -21:47:23.8: 15.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:58:10.12 -14:28:11.8: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0408 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:10.84 -14:49:21.0: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:10.84 -14:49:21.0: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1944 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:46.79 -14:29:20.1: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:41:59.13 -15:33:26.9: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:11.84 -15:29:17.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:48:14.86 -16:35:21.9: 13.44 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:45:19.51 -19:06:34.8: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:11.32 -13:56:24.2: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:42:00.67 -19:28:15.4: 13.54 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:41:59.13 -15:33:26.9: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:46.79 -14:29:20.1: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:59.13 -15:33:26.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4465 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:46.79 -14:29:20.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1391 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:45:19.51 -19:06:34.8: 13.71 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:48:14.86 -16:35:21.9: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:11.84 -15:29:17.8: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:19.51 -19:06:34.8: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6674 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:14.86 -16:35:21.9: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4319 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:43:11.41 -17:48:56.9: 14.17 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:11.32 -13:56:24.2: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:11.32 -13:56:24.2: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9748 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:13:42.74 -16:12:52.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:42:00.67 -19:28:15.4: 13.66 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:00.67 -19:28:15.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9144 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:43:11.41 -17:48:56.9: 14.03 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:11.41 -17:48:56.9: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0434 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:13:42.74 -16:12:52.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:39.47 -19:00:14.0: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:32.71 -15:19:01.4: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:46.36 -22:15:03.4: 14.13 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:52.44 -14:36:31.8: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:51:42.04 -14:52:34.5: 13.92 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:39.47 -19:00:14.0: 14.07 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:15:41.13 -21:16:29.0: 14.21 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:32.71 -15:19:01.4: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:46.36 -22:15:03.4: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:52.44 -14:36:31.8: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:39.47 -19:00:14.0: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0984 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:32.71 -15:19:01.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1429 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:46.36 -22:15:03.4: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0649 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:52.44 -14:36:31.8: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1205 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:50.45 -18:21:46.8: 14.42 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:51:42.04 -14:52:34.5: 13.74 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:42.04 -14:52:34.5: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1965 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:15:41.13 -21:16:29.0: 14.16 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:41.13 -21:16:29.0: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0910 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:50.45 -18:21:46.8: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:50.45 -18:21:46.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2520 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:01.90 -13:55:04.3: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:56.60 -15:22:51.2: 14.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:45.71 -20:08:11.1: 15.43 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:47:24.32 -19:56:37.6: 14.29 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:02:04.01 -15:11:13.7: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:11:45.71 -20:08:11.1: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:29.83 -16:21:16.9: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:56.60 -15:22:51.2: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:01.90 -13:55:04.3: 14.39 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:56.60 -15:22:51.2: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3444 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:01.90 -13:55:04.3: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3440 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:01:56.56 -15:19:26.5: 14.37 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:02:04.01 -15:11:13.7: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:04.01 -15:11:13.7: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4294 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:47:24.32 -19:56:37.6: 14.30 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:24.32 -19:56:37.6: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3490 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:29.83 -16:21:16.9: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:29.83 -16:21:16.9: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3971 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:01:56.56 -15:19:26.5: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:01:56.56 -15:19:26.5: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3871 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:33.27 -14:50:00.7: 14.63 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:17:48.00 -15:48:18.9: 15.21 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:09.00 -14:43:14.3: 14.69 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:54:02.56 -14:42:03.6: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:13:29.48 -20:39:40.3: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:33.27 -14:50:00.7: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:33.27 -14:50:00.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4753 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:12:50.63 -21:45:55.7: 14.59 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:17:48.00 -15:48:18.9: 14.95 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:48.00 -15:48:18.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4842 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:09.00 -14:43:14.3: 14.43 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:09.00 -14:43:14.3: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4748 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:54:02.56 -14:42:03.6: 14.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:02.56 -14:42:03.6: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3017 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:13:29.48 -20:39:40.3: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:29.48 -20:39:40.3: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4265 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:12:50.63 -21:45:55.7: 14.86 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:50.63 -21:45:55.7: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0690 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:56:11.67 -14:06:22.6: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:54.21 -19:01:32.7: 14.32 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:56:11.67 -14:06:22.6: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:43:24.88 -15:32:34.5: 15.09 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:11.67 -14:06:22.6: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3643 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:43:33.21 -14:38:15.4: 14.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:18.14 -18:23:22.1: 14.41 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:50:43.78 -15:11:49.1: 14.53 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:54.21 -19:01:32.7: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:54.21 -19:01:32.7: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4795 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:58.03 -16:35:27.2: 14.57 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:43:24.88 -15:32:34.5: 14.86 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:24.88 -15:32:34.5: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5584 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:43:33.21 -14:38:15.4: 14.77 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:33.21 -14:38:15.4: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3968 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:18.14 -18:23:22.1: 14.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:18.14 -18:23:22.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3980 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:50:43.78 -15:11:49.1: 14.75 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:43.78 -15:11:49.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5324 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:58.03 -16:35:27.2: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:58.03 -16:35:27.2: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4560 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:52:01.50 -16:05:29.7: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:14:09.70 -15:48:38.5: 14.64 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:37.03 -15:49:27.7: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 15:44:08.85 -22:02:10.0: 14.43 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:11:06.37 -21:10:52.1: 14.72 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:52:01.50 -16:05:29.7: 15.19 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:01.50 -16:05:29.7: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5338 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:17:16.11 -21:22:33.6: 14.60 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:14:09.70 -15:48:38.5: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:17.14 -19:42:30.0: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:09.70 -15:48:38.5: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5596 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:37.03 -15:49:27.7: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 15:44:08.85 -22:02:10.0: 14.70 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:37.03 -15:49:27.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2749 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:08.85 -22:02:10.0: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4023 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:11:06.37 -21:10:52.1: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:06.37 -21:10:52.1: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5023 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:17:16.11 -21:22:33.6: 14.84 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:16.11 -21:22:33.6: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4680 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:17.14 -19:42:30.0: 14.83 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:17.14 -19:42:30.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5756 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:18:50.16 -21:40:57.9: 14.37 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:07:03.51 -21:58:48.3: 14.78 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:04:36.39 -22:04:28.9: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:05:56.89 -20:05:48.7: 14.51 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-30-58_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0258.fits at 16:19:08.69 -21:32:30.8: 14.71 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:18:50.16 -21:40:57.9: 14.89 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:50.16 -21:40:57.9: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5402 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:07:03.51 -21:58:48.3: 14.75 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:03.51 -21:58:48.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4495 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:04:36.39 -22:04:28.9: 14.66 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:05:56.89 -20:05:48.7: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:36.39 -22:04:28.9: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5255 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:56.89 -20:05:48.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3426 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-05-09_02-31-48_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0259.fits at 16:19:08.69 -21:32:30.8: 14.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:08.69 -21:32:30.8: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5493 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out80936.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74666.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77670.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out79770.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73614_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73614_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73617_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73617_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73619_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73619_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73629_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73629_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73630_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73630_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73643_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73643_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73648_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73648_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:18:12.50 -19:37:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73652_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73652_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73654_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73654_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:54.58 -21:58:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73868_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 73868_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:43.32 -20:23:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74666_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 74666_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74677_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 74677_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75219_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 75219_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.95 -18:30:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76378_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 76378_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76388_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 76388_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77050_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 77050_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77120_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 77120_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77670_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 77670_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78219_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 78219_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:37.94 -14:50:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78502_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 78502_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:56.16 -18:59:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78827_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 78827_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78839_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 78839_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79256_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 79256_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:36.10 -14:44:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79309_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 79309_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79691_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 79691_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79770_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
Preparing report for the candidate 79770_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 79884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80074_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 80074_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80193_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 80193_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80200_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 80200_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80400_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 80400_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80597_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 80597_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80612_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 80612_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80814_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 80814_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80936_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 80936_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.71 -20:08:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.654 6245445608793926784 242.94078934644 -20.13708506973 12.4380 10.4045 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.654#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81122_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81122_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81394_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81394_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:16.36 -17:19:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81434_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81434_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81474_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81474_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81530_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81530_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81605_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81605_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81625_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81625_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81638_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81638_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:21.46 -22:12:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81643_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81643_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81647_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81647_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81659_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81659_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81738_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81738_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81767_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81767_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81932_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 81932_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82011_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82011_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82025_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82025_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82027_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82027_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82034_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82034_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82044_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82044_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82055_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82055_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82069_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82069_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82289_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82289_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82317_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82317_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82356_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82356_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82394_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82394_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82523_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82523_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82619_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82619_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82711_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82711_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82722_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82722_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82737_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82737_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82799_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82799_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82974_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 82974_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 17884_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:04.57 -20:06:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09608_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 09608_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.94 -21:31:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34137_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 34137_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:06.85 -17:23:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07980_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 07980_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:46.50 -21:49:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28147_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 28147_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.77 -18:18:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46468_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173
The candidate 46468_fd_Lib-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-21_00-46-18_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0173 did not pass the final checks