This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2304 2461212.7304 11.80 15:17:57.92 -09:13:23.1
352.38587 39.18933 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.92 Undina -0 0 0 11.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:17:57.92 -09:13:23.1: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:17:57.92 -09:13:23.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7304,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2304 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2304 2461212.7304 12.14 15:35:25.19 -13:40:14.6
352.41392 33.01992 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 0 -0 0 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:35:25.19 -13:40:14.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:35:25.19 -13:40:14.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7304,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2304 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2304 2461212.7304 12.81 15:08:56.61 -07:59:57.9
351.32536 41.60141 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.269 Justitia -0 -0 0 12.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:08:56.61 -07:59:57.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:08:56.61 -07:59:57.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7304,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2304 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2304 2461212.7304 13.06 15:18:18.00 -10:00:07.4
351.78006 38.56388 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.776 Berbericia -0 -0 0 13.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:18:18.00 -10:00:07.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:18:18.00 -10:00:07.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7304,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2304 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2304 2461212.7304 13.21 15:38:02.13 -09:06:03.5
356.90640 35.76942 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.559 Nanon -0 0 0 13.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:38:02.13 -09:06:03.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:38:02.13 -09:06:03.5: 15.64 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.32
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7304,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2304 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2304 2461212.7304 13.53 15:27:03.07 -13:26:20.9
350.82848 34.58676 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika -0 -0 0 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:27:03.07 -13:26:20.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:27:03.07 -13:26:20.9: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7304,13.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2304 13.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2304 2461212.7304 14.32 15:06:43.34 -14:32:37.7
345.32452 36.95476 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.898 Hildegard 0 2 2 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:06:43.34 -14:32:37.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:06:43.34 -14:32:37.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7304,14.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2304 14.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2304 2461212.7304 12.39 15:21:53.09 -12:06:46.0
350.79247 36.41566 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 2.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" PW Lib
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 V 13.600 V 2453077.87000 0.441196000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:21:53.09 -12:06:46.0: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:21:53.09 -12:06:46.0: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
PW Lib,2461212.7304,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
PW Lib 20260621.2304 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.89842042 23.04.2026 09:33:33.524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
First image: 2461153.89842042 23.04.2026 09:33:33.524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Last image: 2461212.73057925 21.06.2026 05:31:52.047 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7766
Objects passed selection criteria: 7763
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7475.5
Average stars matched: 7269 (97.2376 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113576 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:51:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.89842042 23.04.2026 09:33:33.524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
First image: 2461153.89842042 23.04.2026 09:33:33.524 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Last image: 2461212.73057925 21.06.2026 05:31:52.047 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 185
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53243
Objects passed selection criteria: 53118
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51263
Average stars matched: 49620.5 (96.7959 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 153772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:54:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.73015851
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits'
wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.642 -10:00:07.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:38.658 -09:57:51.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.642 -10:00:07.17
Second-epoch image center 15:25:38.658 -09:57:51.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0429 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:38.445 -09:58:07.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.642 -10:00:07.17
Second-epoch image center 15:25:38.445 -09:58:07.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0394 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:38.658 -09:57:51.32
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:38.445 -09:58:07.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00466 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z2vgH1IgM5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yOpf5G550l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2jNpzTWmHn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uEfIdvv0jp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8132 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 222.9892 to 239.6626 deg, Dec -15.6642 to -4.1937 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 222.9892 to 239.6626 deg, Dec -15.6642 to -4.1937 deg
Loaded 6002 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4551 out of 4710 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4710 out of 8132 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.742100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.742100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.05
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8132 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 222.9892 to 239.6626 deg, Dec -15.6642 to -4.1937 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 222.9892 to 239.6626 deg, Dec -15.6642 to -4.1937 deg
Loaded 6002 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4551 out of 4710 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4710 out of 8132 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8122 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.3808 to 239.4992 deg, Dec -15.2688 to -4.7095 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.3808 to 239.4992 deg, Dec -15.2688 to -4.7095 deg
Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4509 out of 4666 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4666 out of 8122 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
2.2 pix Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.2 pix fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z2vgH1IgM5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=500, passed=8132
Got 8132 stars (including 7623 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8132 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.222 n_q1=252 n_q2=183 n_q3=262 n_q4=269 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.398
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yOpf5G550l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=502, passed=8122
Got 8122 stars (including 7614 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8122 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8023 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8022 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8022 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.611 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=225 n_q2=215 n_q3=241 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.378
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -region wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2jNpzTWmHn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=436, passed=6934
Got 6934 stars (including 6483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6934 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=242 n_q2=197 n_q3=256 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uEfIdvv0jp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, passed=6952
Got 6952 stars (including 6501 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6952 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=245 n_q2=198 n_q3=251 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.262 worst_q_ratio=1.398
ref2=Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.378
new1=fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.262
new2=fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.242
reference average sigma_overall=0.3525 worst_q_ratio=1.388
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (966 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:17:57.92 -09:13:23.1: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:17:57.92 -09:13:23.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20765_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 20765_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:17:57.92 -09:13:23.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:43.642 -10:00:07.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:38.658 -09:57:51.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.642 -10:00:07.17
Second-epoch image center 15:25:38.658 -09:57:51.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0429 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:25:38.445 -09:58:07.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:25:43.642 -10:00:07.17
Second-epoch image center 15:25:38.445 -09:58:07.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0394 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:25:38.658 -09:57:51.32
Second-epoch second image center 15:25:38.445 -09:58:07.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00466 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8OE40ACkCE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gw6aqBQsj1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TALTTB8vuT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wtxrKAbN9N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits and wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 56059 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 222.9892 to 239.6626 deg, Dec -15.6809 to -4.1523 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 222.9892 to 239.6626 deg, Dec -15.6809 to -4.1523 deg
Loaded 6037 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4376 out of 4830 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4830 out of 56059 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.619000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.619000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 56059 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 222.9892 to 239.6626 deg, Dec -15.6809 to -4.1523 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 222.9892 to 239.6626 deg, Dec -15.6809 to -4.1523 deg
Loaded 6037 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4376 out of 4830 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4830 out of 56059 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 50094 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 223.3438 to 239.5045 deg, Dec -15.2716 to -4.7095 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 223.3438 to 239.5045 deg, Dec -15.2716 to -4.7095 deg
Loaded 5381 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4369 out of 4768 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4768 out of 50094 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 156 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
2.1 pix Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
2.0 pix fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
2.0 pix fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
15.1 mag. Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8OE40ACkCE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2373, passed=56048
Got 56048 stars (including 53573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56048 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.7 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.217 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.251 n_q1=258 n_q2=190 n_q3=252 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.347
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits -region wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gw6aqBQsj1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2552, passed=50079
Got 50079 stars (including 47459 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50079 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49453 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49452 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.566 n_q1=247 n_q2=204 n_q3=249 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits -region wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TALTTB8vuT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1913, passed=50383
Got 50383 stars (including 48378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50383 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.314 n_q1=251 n_q2=199 n_q3=244 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.131
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wtxrKAbN9N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1880, passed=50064
Got 50064 stars (including 48106 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50064 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.267 n_q1=254 n_q2=197 n_q3=245 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0178.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_004835_TTUQ1b1x1_2204965_6cvMawyU/wcs_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:53:15.51 -08:18:44.6: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:14:23.70 -05:56:33.1: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:45:54.65 -09:42:15.0: 13.77 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:12:59.65 -05:41:32.8: 14.20 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:35:02.58 -05:15:49.9: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:24:10.39 -05:18:10.4: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:29:28.08 -07:27:06.7: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:48:55.37 -08:56:33.7: 14.23 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:12:59.65 -05:41:32.8: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:14:23.70 -05:56:33.1: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:35:02.58 -05:15:49.9: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:29:28.08 -07:27:06.7: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:53:15.51 -08:18:44.6: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:24:10.39 -05:18:10.4: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:59.65 -05:41:32.8: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2915 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:14:23.70 -05:56:33.1: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5289 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:45:54.65 -09:42:15.0: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:02.58 -05:15:49.9: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2650 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:48:55.37 -08:56:33.7: 14.30 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:28.08 -07:27:06.7: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7457 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:15.51 -08:18:44.6: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0388 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:24:10.39 -05:18:10.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2739 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:54.65 -09:42:15.0: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0750 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:55.37 -08:56:33.7: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5809 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:50:06.64 -05:55:39.5: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:27:35.20 -14:56:47.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:08:56.61 -07:59:57.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:35:25.19 -13:40:14.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:50:06.64 -05:55:39.5: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:06.64 -05:55:39.5: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0587 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:36:59.40 -08:11:36.4: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:18:18.00 -10:00:07.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:52:01.98 -06:16:52.3: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:48:26.01 -05:42:36.5: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:38:02.13 -09:06:03.5: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:27:35.20 -14:56:47.6: 12.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:35:25.19 -13:40:14.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:08:56.61 -07:59:57.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:27:35.20 -14:56:47.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6057 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:36:59.40 -08:11:36.4: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:59.40 -08:11:36.4: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9440 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:18:18.00 -10:00:07.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:48:26.01 -05:42:36.5: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:38:02.13 -09:06:03.5: 15.64 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:52:01.98 -06:16:52.3: 13.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:26.01 -05:42:36.5: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1229 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.64 +/- 0.32
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:38:02.13 -09:06:03.5: ref_mag=15.64 +/- 0.32 new_mean_mag=13.2077 delta=2.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:01.98 -06:16:52.3: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0533 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:57:19.65 -06:12:38.7: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:57:19.65 -06:12:38.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:19.65 -06:12:38.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:27:03.07 -13:26:20.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:26:47.01 -05:55:04.9: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:41:43.84 -05:17:19.9: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:27:03.07 -13:26:20.9: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:26:47.01 -05:55:04.9: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:26:47.01 -05:55:04.9: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5279 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:41:43.84 -05:17:19.9: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:36:24.67 -07:52:41.6: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:43.84 -05:17:19.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7161 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:53:28.31 -15:22:03.6: 14.23 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:53:28.31 -15:22:03.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:28.31 -15:22:03.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:36:24.67 -07:52:41.6: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:24.67 -07:52:41.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7837 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:44:59.31 -15:11:23.1: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:44:59.31 -15:11:23.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:59.31 -15:11:23.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:31:14.67 -12:58:37.0: 13.96 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:09:32.45 -10:19:18.7: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:17:09.28 -08:32:21.4: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:31:14.67 -12:58:37.0: 13.83 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:14.67 -12:58:37.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9814 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:09:32.45 -10:19:18.7: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:17:09.28 -08:32:21.4: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:09:32.45 -10:19:18.7: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0692 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:09.28 -08:32:21.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9948 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:32:26.39 -11:37:13.5: 14.15 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:52:44.83 -13:57:58.1: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:25:14.03 -06:46:32.5: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:49:57.25 -13:49:22.1: 14.47 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:06:43.34 -14:32:37.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:32:26.39 -11:37:13.5: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:26.39 -11:37:13.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2793 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:52:44.83 -13:57:58.1: 14.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:25:14.03 -06:46:32.5: 13.82 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:44.83 -13:57:58.1: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2381 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:25:14.03 -06:46:32.5: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2652 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:49:57.25 -13:49:22.1: 14.49 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:57.25 -13:49:22.1: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3036 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:06:43.34 -14:32:37.7: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:55:47.98 -14:23:57.1: 14.87 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:56:26.15 -09:49:15.4: 14.00 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:44:06.51 -09:34:55.1: 14.12 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:55:47.98 -14:23:57.1: 15.12 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:47.98 -14:23:57.1: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3908 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:56:26.15 -09:49:15.4: 14.05 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:26.15 -09:49:15.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2434 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:44:06.51 -09:34:55.1: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:06.51 -09:34:55.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3027 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:23:01.36 -08:50:54.2: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:21:09.29 -13:59:37.4: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:05:45.94 -13:37:33.6: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:23:01.36 -08:50:54.2: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:23:01.36 -08:50:54.2: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4201 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:21:09.29 -13:59:37.4: 14.08 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:09.29 -13:59:37.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3064 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:05:45.94 -13:37:33.6: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:45.94 -13:37:33.6: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3956 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:57:05.15 -09:28:07.4: 14.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:03:15.24 -14:36:13.9: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:51:39.00 -15:17:03.8: 14.58 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:51:39.00 -15:17:03.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:39.00 -15:17:03.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:03:21.32 -04:54:26.2: 15.07 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:57:05.15 -09:28:07.4: 14.16 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:05.15 -09:28:07.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3752 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:03:15.24 -14:36:13.9: 14.94 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:15.24 -14:36:13.9: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4328 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:03:21.32 -04:54:26.2: 15.50 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:03:21.32 -04:54:26.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5548 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:54:43.57 -07:14:05.9: 15.04 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:10:08.93 -13:23:23.3: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:31:52.41 -14:15:18.7: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:54:43.57 -07:14:05.9: 15.20 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:43.57 -07:14:05.9: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4644 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:10:08.93 -13:23:23.3: 14.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:02:39.86 -14:16:26.6: 14.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:10:08.93 -13:23:23.3: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4391 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:31:52.41 -14:15:18.7: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:31:52.41 -14:15:18.7: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4681 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:02:39.86 -14:16:26.6: 14.42 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:39.86 -14:16:26.6: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4952 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:59:18.16 -12:49:18.1: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:38:51.20 -07:20:36.9: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:59:18.16 -12:49:18.1: 14.72 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:18.16 -12:49:18.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4536 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:59:29.54 -11:52:01.4: 14.89 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:42:42.16 -13:25:14.0: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:38:51.20 -07:20:36.9: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:51.20 -07:20:36.9: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6022 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:59:29.54 -11:52:01.4: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:29.54 -11:52:01.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5612 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:19:53.86 -05:08:50.6: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:42:42.16 -13:25:14.0: 15.19 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:42.16 -13:25:14.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4386 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:54:36.08 -14:07:39.0: 14.77 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:18:06.93 -14:52:03.1: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:19:53.86 -05:08:50.6: 15.08 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:53.86 -05:08:50.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6436 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:54:36.08 -14:07:39.0: 14.97 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:36.08 -14:07:39.0: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6592 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:49:40.40 -10:12:08.8: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:18:06.93 -14:52:03.1: 14.87 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:06.93 -14:52:03.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5737 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:49:40.40 -10:12:08.8: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:40.40 -10:12:08.8: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4741 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:00:03.30 -11:50:33.3: 14.58 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:54:52.36 -12:15:15.7: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:57:01.00 -07:32:34.3: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:56:25.28 -11:22:16.9: 15.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:50:31.13 -12:51:03.9: 15.33 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:59:41.04 -12:12:12.2: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:00:03.30 -11:50:33.3: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:03.30 -11:50:33.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6327 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:54:52.36 -12:15:15.7: 15.10 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:52.36 -12:15:15.7: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5919 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:57:01.00 -07:32:34.3: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:47:06.96 -07:08:51.6: 15.36 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:01.00 -07:32:34.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7133 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:56:25.28 -11:22:16.9: 14.80 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:56:25.28 -11:22:16.9: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6019 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:50:31.13 -12:51:03.9: 14.85 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:31.13 -12:51:03.9: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.5183 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:59:41.04 -12:12:12.2: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:41.04 -12:12:12.2: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7296 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:47:06.96 -07:08:51.6: 15.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:06.96 -07:08:51.6: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6635 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:52:04.04 -08:15:57.5: 14.95 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:57:10.44 -08:42:16.5: 15.14 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:54:43.80 -12:50:04.9: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:55:03.82 -11:07:09.1: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:05:12.50 -09:21:49.9: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:57:48.86 -09:30:50.8: 14.51 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:00:37.58 -11:20:11.8: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:52:04.04 -08:15:57.5: 15.02 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:04.04 -08:15:57.5: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6430 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:01:10.65 -08:11:11.8: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:05:42.60 -05:28:07.9: 15.20 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:57:10.44 -08:42:16.5: 15.07 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:10.44 -08:42:16.5: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6129 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:54:43.80 -12:50:04.9: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:43.80 -12:50:04.9: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6858 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:05:12.50 -09:21:49.9: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:55:03.82 -11:07:09.1: 15.02 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:12.50 -09:21:49.9: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8060 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:03.82 -11:07:09.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5982 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:57:48.86 -09:30:50.8: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:11:46.92 -12:53:02.8: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:48.86 -09:30:50.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5239 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:00:37.58 -11:20:11.8: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:00:37.58 -11:20:11.8: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6891 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:01:10.65 -08:11:11.8: 15.18 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:10.65 -08:11:11.8: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8183 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:05:42.60 -05:28:07.9: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:42.60 -05:28:07.9: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7908 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:11:46.92 -12:53:02.8: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:46.92 -12:53:02.8: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6484 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:55:58.88 -05:42:29.2: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:22:48.77 -05:48:56.6: 14.93 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:55:23.65 -09:00:34.2: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:56:40.22 -08:17:54.1: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:29:43.97 -13:42:16.0: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:19:52.69 -05:53:43.8: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:57:24.68 -05:59:15.4: 14.62 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:55:58.88 -05:42:29.2: 14.73 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:57:24.68 -05:59:15.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:24.68 -05:59:15.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:58.88 -05:42:29.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5189 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:04:45.75 -09:58:51.3: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:40:22.62 -10:57:34.0: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:22:48.77 -05:48:56.6: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:22:48.77 -05:48:56.6: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8139 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:55:23.65 -09:00:34.2: 14.72 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:23.65 -09:00:34.2: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7384 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:56:40.22 -08:17:54.1: 14.85 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:29:43.97 -13:42:16.0: 15.10 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:40.22 -08:17:54.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7488 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:43.97 -13:42:16.0: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8067 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:19:52.69 -05:53:43.8: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:52.69 -05:53:43.8: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8162 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:04:45.75 -09:58:51.3: 15.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:45.75 -09:58:51.3: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8141 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:40:22.62 -10:57:34.0: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:22.62 -10:57:34.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7459 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:21:55.63 -10:51:43.9: 14.54 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:19:25.60 -06:16:19.3: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:21:58.51 -11:58:54.1: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:42:38.32 -07:06:11.5: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:16:54.26 -09:09:09.1: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:51:48.14 -07:29:51.2: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:54:30.48 -10:05:34.1: 14.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:21:55.63 -10:51:43.9: 14.10 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:55.63 -10:51:43.9: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7487 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:19:25.60 -06:16:19.3: 14.71 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:21:58.51 -11:58:54.1: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:25.60 -06:16:19.3: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6112 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:58.51 -11:58:54.1: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6187 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:44:56.55 -11:10:47.6: 15.24 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:42:38.32 -07:06:11.5: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:56:49.66 -06:13:50.9: 14.90 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:38.32 -07:06:11.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7253 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:16:54.26 -09:09:09.1: 14.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:16:54.26 -09:09:09.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7684 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:54:30.48 -10:05:34.1: 14.90 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:51:48.14 -07:29:51.2: 14.83 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:30.48 -10:05:34.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4401 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:48.14 -07:29:51.2: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6144 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:41:59.38 -12:42:01.8: 15.11 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:44:56.55 -11:10:47.6: 15.39 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:56.55 -11:10:47.6: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.5897 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:56:49.66 -06:13:50.9: 14.88 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:49.66 -06:13:50.9: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6869 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:49:55.07 -11:39:44.1: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:55:07.78 -12:54:40.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:41:59.38 -12:42:01.8: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:59.38 -12:42:01.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6726 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:21:53.09 -12:06:46.0: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 14:54:43.92 -11:59:36.3: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-33-33_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits at 15:11:18.33 -04:44:29.1: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:49:55.07 -11:39:44.1: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:55.07 -11:39:44.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6103 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:55:07.78 -12:54:40.0: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:55:07.78 -12:54:40.0: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8705 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:21:53.09 -12:06:46.0: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:21:53.09 -12:06:46.0: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.3917 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 14:54:43.92 -11:59:36.3: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:43.92 -11:59:36.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9899 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-14-41_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0275.fits at 15:11:18.33 -04:44:29.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:18.33 -04:44:29.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52541.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70057.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70060.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70063.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70084.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70149.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69975_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 69975_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69983_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 69983_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69994_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 69994_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69997_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 69997_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70001_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70001_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70009_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70009_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:36.79 -12:04:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70013_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70013_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70018_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70018_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70021_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70021_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70028_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70028_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70029_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70029_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70032_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70032_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70034_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70034_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:57.91 -09:13:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70035_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70035_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:57.85 -13:30:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70036_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70036_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70040_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70040_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70041_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70041_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70043_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 70043_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70048_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70048_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70050_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70050_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70051_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70051_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70052_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70052_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70053_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70053_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70056_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70056_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70057_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 70057_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70058_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70058_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70059_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70059_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70060_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 70060_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70062_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70062_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70063_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 70063_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70064_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70064_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70066_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70066_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:55.70 -14:44:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70067_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70067_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:07:19.57 -13:21:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70068_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70068_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:14.13 -11:48:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70069_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70069_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70070_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70070_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70073_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70073_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70080_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70080_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70082_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70082_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70084_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 70084_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70087_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70087_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70089_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70089_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70090_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70090_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70093_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70093_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70094_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70094_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70095_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70095_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:14.55 -14:30:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70097_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70097_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70100_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70100_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70103_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70103_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70104_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70104_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70105_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70105_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70107_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70107_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70108_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70108_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70112_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70112_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70115_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70115_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70117_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70117_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70119_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70119_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70120_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70120_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70121_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70121_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70124_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70124_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70130_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70130_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70134_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70134_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70137_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70137_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:58.49 -14:05:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70139_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70139_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70140_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70140_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70143_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70143_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70146_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70146_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70149_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 70149_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70153_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70153_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70155_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70155_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70156_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70156_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:55:03.90 -13:46:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70160_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70160_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70163_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70163_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70165_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70165_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:59.92 -14:28:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70167_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70167_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70175_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70175_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70176_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70176_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70177_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70177_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70180_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70180_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70181_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70181_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70183_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70183_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70188_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70188_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70189_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70189_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70190_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70190_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70191_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70191_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70193_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70193_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70200_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70200_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70208_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70208_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70210_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70210_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70218_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70218_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70222_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70222_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70227_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70227_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70228_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70228_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:00.67 -12:48:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70234_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70234_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70235_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70235_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70241_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70241_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70243_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70243_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70245_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70245_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70246_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70246_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:37.37 -14:29:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70248_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70248_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70249_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70249_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70253_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70253_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70256_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70256_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70261_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70261_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:27.07 -13:15:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70265_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70265_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70266_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70266_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70268_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70268_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70276_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70276_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:19.25 -04:34:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70277_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70277_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70284_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70284_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70288_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70288_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70289_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70289_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70291_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70291_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70296_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70296_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70304_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70304_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70306_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70306_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70309_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70309_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70315_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70315_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70320_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70320_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70325_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70325_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70329_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70329_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70334_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70334_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70339_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70339_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70348_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70348_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70351_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70351_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70366_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70366_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70389_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70389_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70414_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70414_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70421_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70421_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70423_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70423_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70424_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70424_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70428_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70428_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70436_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70436_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70437_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70437_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70439_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70439_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70441_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70441_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70448_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70448_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70452_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70452_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70456_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70456_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70465_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70465_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70466_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70466_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70475_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70475_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70477_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70477_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70486_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70486_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70491_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70491_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70510_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70510_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70536_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70536_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70552_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70552_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70563_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70563_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70568_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70568_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70575_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70575_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70582_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 70582_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52541_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
Preparing report for the candidate 52541_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66197_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 66197_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66169_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 66169_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01470_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179
The candidate 01470_fd_Lib-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-31-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0179 did not pass the final checks
