This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2177 2461212.7177 11.49 14:57:37.88 -22:53:27.7
337.32389 31.42271 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.70 Panopaea 0 0 0 11.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:57:37.88 -22:53:27.7: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:57:37.88 -22:53:27.7: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7177,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2177 11.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2177 2461212.7177 12.03 15:35:25.68 -13:40:12.6
352.41608 33.01894 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 1 1 1 12.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:35:25.68 -13:40:12.6: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:35:25.68 -13:40:12.6: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7177,12.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2177 12.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2177 2461212.7177 13.25 15:36:06.76 -19:50:15.7
347.66975 28.38946 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.363 Padua 1 0 1 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:36:06.76 -19:50:15.7: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:36:06.76 -19:50:15.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7177,13.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2177 13.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2177 2461212.7177 13.37 15:27:03.61 -13:26:19.5
350.83075 34.58556 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.563 Suleika 1 1 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:27:03.61 -13:26:19.5: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:27:03.61 -13:26:19.5: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7177,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2177 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2177 2461212.7177 14.20 15:06:43.47 -14:32:44.4
345.32359 36.95298 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.898 Hildegard 1 1 2 13.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:06:43.47 -14:32:44.4: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:06:43.47 -14:32:44.4: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7177,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2177 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2177 2461212.7177 14.24 14:40:06.51 -14:09:34.0
338.85581 41.01074 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.394 Arduina 1 -0 1 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:40:06.51 -14:09:34.0: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:40:06.51 -14:09:34.0: 15.44 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7177,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2177 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2177 2461212.7177 14.33 15:07:27.67 -21:12:22.8
340.64346 31.52572 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.541 Deborah 1 1 2 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:07:27.67 -21:12:22.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:07:27.67 -21:12:22.8: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7177,14.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2177 14.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2177 2461212.7177 14.27 15:24:13.51 -20:20:37.8
344.86641 29.82030 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.229 Adelinda 2 -1 2 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 15:24:13.51 -20:20:37.8: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 15:24:13.51 -20:20:37.8: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7177,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2177 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461212.71806181 21.06.2026 05:13:50.540 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7964
Objects passed selection criteria: 7959
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7239.5
Average stars matched: 7039.5 (97.2374 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113632 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:16:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
First image: 2461168.78864272 08.05.2026 06:55:28.731 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Last image: 2461212.71806181 21.06.2026 05:13:50.540 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 153
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 54104
Objects passed selection criteria: 53974
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51239.8
Average stars matched: 48423.5 (94.5038 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 153224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:19:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.71732865
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:29.160 -17:59:29.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79
Second-epoch image center 15:06:29.160 -17:59:29.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0658 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 930.3'x626.9' 15.5(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.83"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:32.435 -17:59:09.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:43.150 -18:01:37.79
Second-epoch image center 15:06:32.435 -17:59:09.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0592 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:06:29.160 -17:59:29.99
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:32.435 -17:59:09.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01419 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3fyfrvOhaU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gge8KjR1jB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4z82zMj8vv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xuW9MezcIX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits and wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Loaded 6117 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4930 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 8201 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2332 to 235.1247 deg, Dec -23.2849 to -12.6731 deg
Loaded 6117 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4930 out of 5078 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5078 out of 8201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8227 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.2337 to 235.1256 deg, Dec -23.2686 to -12.6675 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.2337 to 235.1256 deg, Dec -23.2686 to -12.6675 deg
Loaded 6114 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4966 out of 5104 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5104 out of 8227 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
14.8 mag. Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3fyfrvOhaU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=8201
Got 8201 stars (including 7705 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8201 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.711 n_q1=244 n_q2=224 n_q3=262 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.555
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Gge8KjR1jB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=457, passed=8227
Got 8227 stars (including 7762 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8227 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8162 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.735 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.593 n_q1=216 n_q2=289 n_q3=194 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.471
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits -region wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4z82zMj8vv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, passed=6382
Got 6382 stars (including 5944 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6382 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6303 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.315 n_q1=243 n_q2=214 n_q3=283 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xuW9MezcIX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=447, passed=6337
Got 6337 stars (including 5878 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6337 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 930.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 930.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012921 (46.5 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010337 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 612 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 603 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 589 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.69"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 602 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3738 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.97"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 643 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 636 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.79"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 635 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.12"
Excluding outliers - 635 stars left (next iteration limit 662)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=635 sigma_overall_arcsec=3.592 sigma_q1_arcsec=3.218 sigma_q2_arcsec=8.182 sigma_q3_arcsec=3.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=14.636 n_q1=248 n_q2=65 n_q3=283 n_q4=39 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=4.075
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.468 worst_q_ratio=1.555
ref2=Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.500 worst_q_ratio=1.471
new1=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.260
new2=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=3.592 worst_q_ratio=4.075
reference average sigma_overall=0.484 worst_q_ratio=1.513
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits) flagged: sigma=3.592 (ref avg 0.484), ratio=4.075 (ref avg 1.513), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 6233 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3696195.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3696195.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 78.7786 (1.63351e+34), 21 match, 0 conflict, 63 distractors, 95 index.
RA,Dec = (226.623,-17.9759), pixel scale 5.96298 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --++--+----+------+-------++--++--++---+--+-------+---+-------++--+-------+---+----+(best)--------------+-
Field 1: solved with index index-4114.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3696195.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3696195.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.633927, -17.984034) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:32.143, -17:59:02.522).
Field size: 15.7938 x 10.5767 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.32 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 21 00:18 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 21 00:18 out3696195.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3696195.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3696195.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7417 degrees of RA,Dec (226.633,-17.9848)
log-odds ratio 23.3131 (1.33272e+10), 5 match, 0 conflict, 14 distractors, 30 index.
RA,Dec = (226.647,-18.0017), pixel scale 5.94081 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --+---+---+---+---+(best)-------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3696195.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3696195.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.663497, -18.005342) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:39.239, -18:00:19.231).
Field size: 15.6905 x 10.6311 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.636 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 21 00:18 fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Jun 21 00:18 out3696195.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 37564 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5819, 953.132] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.58017
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.376197
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.0161939
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 63.1248 (2.59857e+27), 31 match, 0 conflict, 226 distractors, 93 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+---------+-----+-------+--------------------------------++------+--------+-++----------+---
--> log-odds 63.1248
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 229.916 (7.10019e+99), 60 match, 0 conflict, 261 distractors, 193 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+---------+-----+-+-----++-+----+---------------+--+-----++-+----+--------+-++------+---+---
--> log-odds 229.916
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 475.282 (2.58327e+206), 112 match, 0 conflict, 358 distractors, 378 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-----++------+-+-----+-+-+---++-+----+-------+-++----+--+-----++-+----++-------+-++---+--+---+-+-
--> log-odds 475.282
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 726.798 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 532 distractors, 737 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-----++------+-+-----+---+---++-+----+--+----+-++----+--+-----++-+----++------++-++---+--+---+-+-
--> log-odds 726.798
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1142.16 (inf), 362 match, 0 conflict, 1121 distractors, 1457 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-----++------+-+-----+---+---++-+----+--+----+-++----+--+-----++-+----++------++-+----+--+---+-+-
--> log-odds 1142.16
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.5819, 953.132] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.58017
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.376197
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0.0161939
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 63.1248 (2.59857e+27), 31 match, 0 conflict, 226 distractors, 93 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+---------+-----+-------+--------------------------------++------+--------+-++----------+---
--> log-odds 63.1248
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 229.916 (7.10019e+99), 60 match, 0 conflict, 261 distractors, 193 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: --------+---------+-----+-+-----++-+----+---------------+--+-----++-+----+--------+-++------+---+---
--> log-odds 229.916
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 475.282 (2.58327e+206), 112 match, 0 conflict, 358 distractors, 378 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-----++------+-+-----+-+-+---++-+----+-------+-++----+--+-----++-+----++-------+-++---+--+---+-+-
--> log-odds 475.282
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 726.798 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 532 distractors, 737 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-----++------+-+-----+---+---++-+----+--+----+-++----+--+-----++-+----++------++-++---+--+---+-+-
--> log-odds 726.798
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1142.16 (inf), 362 match, 0 conflict, 1121 distractors, 1457 index.
RA,Dec = (226.664,-18.0046), pixel scale 5.972 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -++-----++------+-+-----+---+---++-+----+--+----+-++----+--+-----++-+----++------++-+----+--+---+-+-
--> log-odds 1142.16
Got 10 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.633140, -17.982525) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:31.953, -17:58:57.090).
Field size: 15.7898 x 10.5773 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -176.322 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 943.6'x628.4' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:31.731 -17:58:59.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6337 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3748971.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=447, passed=6337
Got 6337 stars (including 5878 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6337 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 936 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6058 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 934 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6120 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.13"
Excluding outliers - 934 stars left (next iteration limit 1013)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=934 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.178 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.195 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.393 n_q1=248 n_q2=195 n_q3=282 n_q4=209 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.916
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 improved 2nd new image (fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits): sigma 3.592->1.521, ratio 4.075->0.916; keeping retry result
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: updated local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits with order-2 result
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=1.521 -- 3.14x the reference average (0.484); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (934 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.90 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-12-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_001436_TTUQ1b1x1_3491787_XrUrNRde/wcs_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:50:01.00 -15:31:57.3: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_01-55-28_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 14:57:37.88 -22:53:27.7: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:50:01.00 -15:31:57.3: 11.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:01.00 -15:31:57.3: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9623 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-56-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0239.fits at 14:57:37.88 -22:53:27.7: 15.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20667.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20580_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.69 -21:10:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20630_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:29.21 -20:19:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20667_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 20667_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20738_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 20738_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02571_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 02571_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:47.83 -16:09:58.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03685_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 03685_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69427_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69427_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:50:53.44 -14:27:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69432_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69432_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:07.30 -13:53:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69436_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69436_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69437_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69437_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69438_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69438_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:07:21.54 -18:33:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69441_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69441_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69442_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69442_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69447_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69447_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:52.88 -20:59:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69449_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69449_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:49.80 -14:34:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69451_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69451_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69452_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69452_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:29:49.99 -19:50:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69457_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69457_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69458_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69458_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:01.44 -14:25:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69459_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69459_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69607_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69607_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:37.90 -22:53:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69655_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69655_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:21:57.85 -13:30:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69727_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 69727_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69843_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69843_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69855_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69855_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:41.32 -13:58:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69970_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 69970_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:34.01 -18:55:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70131_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70131_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:37:26.16 -15:09:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70149_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70149_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:10:23.93 -13:43:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70164_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70164_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70169_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70169_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:05.89 -14:14:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70190_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70190_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70193_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70193_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:59:14.42 -20:08:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70205_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 70205_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70215_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 70215_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70243_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70243_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:54.64 -15:20:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70332_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70332_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70341_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70341_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:26.36 -22:53:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70352_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70352_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:23:14.61 -14:30:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70373_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70373_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:30:43.24 -22:10:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70375_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70375_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70441_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70441_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:58.96 -15:21:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70442_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70442_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:13.38 -23:03:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70451_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70451_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70452_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70452_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70489_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70489_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70494_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70494_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70543_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70543_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:20:23.98 -15:41:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70563_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70563_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70569_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70569_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:05:06.97 -13:55:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70593_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70593_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:44.21 -17:34:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70609_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70609_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:45.73 -15:29:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70638_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70638_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70668_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70668_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:43.90 -22:40:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70681_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70681_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70697_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70697_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70714_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70714_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70720_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70720_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:39.78 -21:36:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70726_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70726_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70728_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70728_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:38:52.40 -17:19:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70733_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70733_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:40.17 -14:56:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70755_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70755_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70761_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70761_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70796_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70796_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:01.93 -20:49:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70798_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70798_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:22:51.53 -22:55:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70812_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70812_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70814_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70814_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70828_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70828_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70844_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70844_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70856_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70856_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70871_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70871_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70891_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70891_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70902_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70902_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:29.58 -19:46:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70914_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 70914_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70936_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70936_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70937_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70937_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70944_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70944_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70947_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70947_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:05.53 -12:53:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70956_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70956_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70960_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 70960_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70961_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70961_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:20.31 -23:04:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70966_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70966_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:34:54.90 -16:57:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70973_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70973_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:52:06.19 -22:27:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70974_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70974_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71015_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71015_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71016_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71016_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71026_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71026_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71027_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71027_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71032_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71032_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71037_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71037_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71048_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71048_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71049_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71049_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71054_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71054_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71058_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71058_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71070_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71070_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71073_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71073_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71074_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71074_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71079_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71079_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71082_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71082_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71083_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71083_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71084_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71084_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71089_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71089_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:32:10.03 -22:44:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71093_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71093_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71105_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71105_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71110_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71110_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71115_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71115_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71124_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71124_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:39:00.58 -14:36:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71128_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71128_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71134_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71134_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71136_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71136_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71146_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71146_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71150_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71150_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71156_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71156_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71158_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71158_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71174_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71174_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71179_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 71179_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71184_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71184_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71240_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71240_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71245_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71245_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71258_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71258_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71260_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71260_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71264_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71264_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71269_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71269_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71281_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 71281_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71284_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71284_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71295_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71295_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71311_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71311_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71315_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71315_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71342_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71342_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71351_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71351_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71357_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71357_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71370_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71370_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71441_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 71441_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36939_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 36939_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:44:37.08 -19:32:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36077_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 36077_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:37:29.23 -20:19:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44924_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 44924_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.71 -21:10:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24105_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 24105_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:40:22.31 -17:39:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41462_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 41462_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16391_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 16391_fd_Lib-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-13-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
