This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2114 2461212.7114 12.19 14:18:17.27 -12:59:30.4
333.39529 44.68186 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.116 Sirona 0 0 0 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:18:17.27 -12:59:30.4: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:18:17.27 -12:59:30.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.2114* 14 18 17.27 -12 59 30.4 12.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7114,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2114 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2114 2461212.7114 12.88 14:03:09.82 -10:02:13.2
330.43482 48.96664 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.79 Eurynome -0 0 0 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:03:09.82 -10:02:13.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:03:09.82 -10:02:13.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.2114* 14 03 09.82 -10 02 13.2 12.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7114,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2114 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2114 2461212.7114 13.10 14:24:15.81 -11:39:47.4
336.10409 45.14637 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.144 Vibilia -0 -0 0 13.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:24:15.81 -11:39:47.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:24:15.81 -11:39:47.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7114,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2114 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2114 2461212.7114 13.28 14:37:27.78 -06:09:03.2
344.45901 47.98718 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.498 Tokio -0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:37:27.78 -06:09:03.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:37:27.78 -06:09:03.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 21.2114* 14 37 27.78 -06 09 03.2 13.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7114,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2114 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2114 2461212.7114 13.26 14:49:42.63 -11:50:25.0
343.16809 41.60978 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.694 Ekard 1 -0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:49:42.63 -11:50:25.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:49:42.63 -11:50:25.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7114,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2114 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.2114 2461212.7114 14.13 14:40:06.59 -14:09:33.6
338.85625 41.01066 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.394 Arduina -0 0 0 14.2 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:40:06.59 -14:09:33.6: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:40:06.59 -14:09:33.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.7114,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.2114 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
First image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Last image: 2461212.71163500 21.06.2026 05:04:35.264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6171
Objects passed selection criteria: 6167
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5920.5
Average stars matched: 5815 (98.2181 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112204 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:10:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
First image: 2461177.74013294 17.05.2026 05:45:37.486 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Last image: 2461212.71163500 21.06.2026 05:04:35.264 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 43
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 43298
Objects passed selection criteria: 43206
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41608.8
Average stars matched: 40343.8 (96.9598 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 143856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 21 00:13:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.71117313
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:08.783 -09:59:26.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:08.783 -09:59:26.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0254 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:06.753 -09:59:22.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:06.753 -09:59:22.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0328 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:08.783 -09:59:26.12
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:06.753 -09:59:22.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00841 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SVbFBSP6UH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iPhVmFsvNb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tdEdm5o1Ys
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t7Q2HurwGL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4925 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3653 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6505 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.748900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.748900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.00
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1784 to 226.7337 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4925 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3653 out of 3795 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3795 out of 6505 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 6495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1250 to 226.7332 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1250 to 226.7332 deg, Dec -15.6102 to -4.3286 deg
Loaded 4942 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3664 out of 3804 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3804 out of 6495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
2.1 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
15.0 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.SVbFBSP6UH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=6505
Got 6505 stars (including 6011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6421 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=221 n_q2=224 n_q3=275 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.045
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iPhVmFsvNb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=473, passed=6495
Got 6495 stars (including 6011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6405 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=221 n_q2=222 n_q3=275 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tdEdm5o1Ys (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=403, passed=5423
Got 5423 stars (including 5017 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5423 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5339 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=219 n_q2=226 n_q3=273 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t7Q2HurwGL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=407, passed=5431
Got 5431 stars (including 5019 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5431 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=211 n_q2=228 n_q3=275 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.157
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.045
ref2=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.114
new1=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits sigma_overall=0.347 worst_q_ratio=1.117
new2=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.157
reference average sigma_overall=0.3495 worst_q_ratio=1.0795
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:31:50.51 -09:20:59.6: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:31:50.51 -09:20:59.6: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:31:50.51 -09:20:59.6: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9897 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20394_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 20394_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20395_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 20395_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:32:59.88 -10:56:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:08.783 -09:59:26.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:08.783 -09:59:26.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0254 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:34:06.753 -09:59:22.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:34:13.532 -10:00:24.81
Second-epoch image center 14:34:06.753 -09:59:22.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0328 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:34:08.783 -09:59:26.12
Second-epoch second image center 14:34:06.753 -09:59:22.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00841 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8WLGwsdpgI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rReomPJDUC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qiPJC18uS1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AzgYhf7etz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits and wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44976 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1249 to 226.7541 deg, Dec -15.6275 to -4.2266 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1249 to 226.7541 deg, Dec -15.6275 to -4.2266 deg
Loaded 4999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3962 out of 44976 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.604400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.604400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44976 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1249 to 226.7541 deg, Dec -15.6275 to -4.2266 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1249 to 226.7541 deg, Dec -15.6275 to -4.2266 deg
Loaded 4999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3584 out of 3962 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3962 out of 44976 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 44874 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 210.1250 to 226.7538 deg, Dec -15.6278 to -4.2271 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 210.1250 to 226.7538 deg, Dec -15.6278 to -4.2271 deg
Loaded 4999 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3604 out of 3957 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3957 out of 44874 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
1.9 pix Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
1.9 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
1.9 pix fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
15.2 mag. Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8WLGwsdpgI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1893, passed=44954
Got 44954 stars (including 42983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44954 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44492 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=228 n_q2=220 n_q3=278 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.025
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rReomPJDUC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1841, passed=44856
Got 44856 stars (including 42929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44856 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 44294 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=229 n_q2=218 n_q3=279 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.179
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qiPJC18uS1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1301, passed=38963
Got 38963 stars (including 37604 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38963 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38531 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=220 n_q2=229 n_q3=272 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AzgYhf7etz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1308, passed=38805
Got 38805 stars (including 37437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38805 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38372 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 38373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=218 n_q2=228 n_q3=270 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-03-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0152.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-21_CI_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_000835_TTUQ1b1x1_2419424_TvOFZhse/wcs_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:24:15.81 -11:39:47.4: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:26:01.59 -12:05:43.0: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:43:25.27 -12:40:31.0: 13.98 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:26:36.69 -11:11:07.7: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:18:17.27 -12:59:30.4: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:03:09.82 -10:02:13.2: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:44:02.93 -05:16:53.6: 14.65 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:37:27.78 -06:09:03.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:26:01.59 -12:05:43.0: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:26:36.69 -11:11:07.7: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:03:09.82 -10:02:13.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:43:25.27 -12:40:31.0: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:01.59 -12:05:43.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7493 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:18:17.27 -12:59:30.4: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:24:15.81 -11:39:47.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:44:02.93 -05:16:53.6: 14.59 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:26:36.69 -11:11:07.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1929 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:43:25.27 -12:40:31.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0361 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:44:02.93 -05:16:53.6: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6444 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:49:42.63 -11:50:25.0: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:37:27.78 -06:09:03.2: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:49:42.63 -11:50:25.0: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:41:00.74 -08:26:17.1: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:40:06.59 -14:09:33.6: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:04:15.19 -14:20:50.8: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:18:10.90 -09:47:21.6: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:01:24.18 -15:19:35.0: 14.38 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:41:00.74 -08:26:17.1: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:40:06.59 -14:09:33.6: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:41:00.74 -08:26:17.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2481 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:01:24.18 -15:19:35.0: 14.52 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:04:15.19 -14:20:50.8: 14.47 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:18:10.90 -09:47:21.6: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:24.18 -15:19:35.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0606 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:18:10.90 -09:47:21.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1729 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:15.19 -14:20:50.8: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2927 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:03:00.88 -12:38:45.2: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:57:54.61 -12:22:10.5: 14.66 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:53:12.16 -14:46:12.0: 14.63 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:59:18.26 -06:42:23.9: 14.83 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:03:00.88 -12:38:45.2: 14.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:53:12.16 -14:46:12.0: 14.82 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:57:54.61 -12:22:10.5: 14.59 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:03:00.88 -12:38:45.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5429 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:12.16 -14:46:12.0: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4750 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:57:54.61 -12:22:10.5: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4489 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:59:18.26 -06:42:23.9: 14.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:59:18.26 -06:42:23.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6091 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:01:48.39 -14:46:06.3: 14.41 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:05:22.36 -09:48:21.6: 15.03 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:34:29.53 -13:48:59.3: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:50:05.42 -06:43:41.7: 15.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:01:48.39 -14:46:06.3: 14.57 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:48.39 -14:46:06.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5023 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:05:22.36 -09:48:21.6: 14.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:05:22.36 -09:48:21.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5172 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:34:29.53 -13:48:59.3: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:50:05.42 -06:43:41.7: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:29.53 -13:48:59.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4549 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:05.42 -06:43:41.7: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6591 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:02:53.64 -14:43:08.7: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:35:45.37 -09:00:12.1: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:02:53.64 -14:43:08.7: 14.66 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:53.64 -14:43:08.7: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6295 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:02:52.16 -11:36:50.3: 14.52 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:35:45.37 -09:00:12.1: 14.97 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:35:45.37 -09:00:12.1: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7917 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:48:39.96 -08:12:36.5: 14.89 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:02:52.16 -11:36:50.3: 14.92 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:02:52.16 -11:36:50.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3898 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:48:39.96 -08:12:36.5: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:48:39.96 -08:12:36.5: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7933 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 15:04:54.93 -07:08:45.7: 15.04 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-45-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits at 14:54:39.73 -07:28:55.3: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 15:04:54.93 -07:08:45.7: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:04:54.93 -07:08:45.7: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=14.6733 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-46-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits at 14:54:39.73 -07:28:55.3: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:39.73 -07:28:55.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7696 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53703.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53723.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53736.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53748.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53753.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53849.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53664_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53664_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53665_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53665_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53674_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53674_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53675_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53675_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53703_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 53703_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53723_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 53723_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53724_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53724_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:32:21.97 -14:10:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53727_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53727_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:37.70 -14:10:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53732_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53732_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:07:54.70 -06:18:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53736_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 53736_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53737_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53737_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:17:11.31 -05:44:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53748_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 53748_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53751_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53751_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:00:51.16 -08:31:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53753_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 53753_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53762_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53762_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:06:11.02 -11:48:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53766_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53766_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:13:48.71 -11:49:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53767_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53767_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:22:36.65 -07:47:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53768_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53768_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:30:48.98 -08:38:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53815_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53815_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:38:15.41 -13:04:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53846_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53846_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53849_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
Preparing report for the candidate 53849_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53853_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53853_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53855_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53857_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53857_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53894_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53894_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:27:48.84 -14:25:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53901_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53901_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53930_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53930_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53935_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53935_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53951_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53951_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53969_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53969_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53976_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53976_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:03:48.10 -11:00:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53977_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53977_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53979_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53979_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53987_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 53987_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54000_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 54000_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54006_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 54006_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54018_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 54018_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54038_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 54038_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54079_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 54079_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54080_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 54080_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27336_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153
The candidate 27336_fd_Lib-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-21_00-04-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0153 did not pass the final checks
