This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.1743 2461212.6743 10.14 15:53:38.36 -29:28:15.6
343.89585 18.55785 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite 1 -0 1 10.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:53:38.36 -29:28:15.6: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:53:38.36 -29:28:15.6: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.6743,10.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.1743 10.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.1743 2461212.6743 11.38 14:57:39.15 -22:53:23.0
337.32951 31.42115 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.70 Panopaea 0 -0 1 11.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:57:39.15 -22:53:23.0: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:57:39.15 -22:53:23.0: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.6743,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.1743 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.1743 2461212.6743 13.23 15:52:26.91 -24:53:20.8
346.99172 22.11325 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.556 Phyllis 1 -1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:52:26.91 -24:53:20.8: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:52:26.91 -24:53:20.8: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.6743,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.1743 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.1743 2461212.6743 13.88 15:27:06.03 -23:54:39.8
342.90361 26.62986 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.678 Fredegundis -1 -1 2 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:27:06.03 -23:54:39.8: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:27:06.03 -23:54:39.8: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461212.6743,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260621.1743 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 21.1743 2461212.6743 12.20 15:48:09.69 -24:14:29.7
346.69213 23.25035 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASAS J154811-2414.4
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.340 V Y 2.270 V 2452810.90000 268.389648000000 M6+
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:48:09.69 -24:14:29.7: 13.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:48:09.69 -24:14:29.7: 13.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J154811-2414.4,2461212.6743,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J154811-2414.4 20260621.1743 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.87743560 18.04.2026 09:03:20.436 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
First image: 2461148.87743560 18.04.2026 09:03:20.436 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Last image: 2461212.67463211 21.06.2026 04:11:18.214 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7295
Objects passed selection criteria: 7294
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6810.75
Average stars matched: 6604.75 (96.9754 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112876 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 23:40:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461148.87743560 18.04.2026 09:03:20.436 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
First image: 2461148.87743560 18.04.2026 09:03:20.436 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Last image: 2461212.67463211 21.06.2026 04:11:18.214 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 99
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 49109
Objects passed selection criteria: 49021
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45493.8
Average stars matched: 43981.8 (96.6765 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 151272 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 23:43:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461212.67395828
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits'
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:38.875 -26:00:09.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 940.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:40.524 -26:00:19.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:38.875 -26:00:09.52
Second-epoch image center 15:21:40.524 -26:00:19.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:43.229 -25:59:49.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:38.875 -26:00:09.52
Second-epoch image center 15:21:43.229 -25:59:49.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:21:40.524 -26:00:19.74
Second-epoch second image center 15:21:43.229 -25:59:49.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UnlMGzSa26
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XoWNMBXaYv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yOmU5KeLmo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z8Fs0Ty65t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Loaded 7407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5126 out of 5277 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5277 out of 7308 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.580000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.580000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.4484 to 239.5880 deg, Dec -31.2802 to -20.4463 deg
Loaded 7407 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5126 out of 5277 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5277 out of 7308 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 6633 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.3181 to 239.4557 deg, Dec -31.2552 to -20.5618 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.3181 to 239.4557 deg, Dec -31.2552 to -20.5618 deg
Loaded 7300 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4898 out of 5014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5014 out of 6633 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 15 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.4 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
3.9 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
3.9 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.5 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.3 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UnlMGzSa26 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=471, passed=7308
Got 7308 stars (including 6831 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7219 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7220 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.697 n_q1=219 n_q2=256 n_q3=251 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XoWNMBXaYv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=413, passed=6633
Got 6633 stars (including 6215 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.914 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.695 n_q1=235 n_q2=281 n_q3=230 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.606
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yOmU5KeLmo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=328, passed=6723
Got 6723 stars (including 6390 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6723 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6623 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6623 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6623 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=215 n_q2=278 n_q3=239 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z8Fs0Ty65t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=6772
Got 6772 stars (including 6427 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6772 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6682 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.536 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=218 n_q2=276 n_q3=239 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.353
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits sigma_overall=0.581 worst_q_ratio=1.201
ref2=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits sigma_overall=0.569 worst_q_ratio=1.606
new1=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new2=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.353
reference average sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.4035
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:57:39.15 -22:53:23.0: 15.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:53:38.36 -29:28:15.6: 14.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:19:37.10 -25:13:50.4: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:35:47.83 -27:04:44.8: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:21:01.37 -27:14:05.5: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:42:05.94 -23:03:56.6: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:53:38.36 -29:28:15.6: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:57:39.15 -22:53:23.0: 14.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:19:37.10 -25:13:50.4: 11.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:19:37.10 -25:13:50.4: ref_mag=11.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5915 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:35:47.83 -27:04:44.8: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:21:01.37 -27:14:05.5: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:42:05.94 -23:03:56.6: 11.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:35:47.83 -27:04:44.8: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6661 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:21:01.37 -27:14:05.5: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6930 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:05.94 -23:03:56.6: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7127 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20419.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20256_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20256_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:29.65 -22:03:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20304_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 20304_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20306_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20306_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.66 -21:10:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20357_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20357_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.01 -29:15:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20382_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20382_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:52.85 -25:58:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20392_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20392_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:56.46 -27:54:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 20419_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20444_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:16.76 -29:24:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20448_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20448_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:29.17 -25:40:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20463_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20463_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20482_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20482_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20485_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20485_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:22:21.23 -22:44:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20493_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20493_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20494_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 20494_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06461_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 06461_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:46.30 -30:14:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:53:38.36 -29:28:15.6
14:57:39.15 -22:53:23.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:38.875 -26:00:09.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:40.524 -26:00:19.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:38.875 -26:00:09.52
Second-epoch image center 15:21:40.524 -26:00:19.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0068 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Image size: 940.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:21:43.229 -25:59:49.20 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:21:38.875 -26:00:09.52
Second-epoch image center 15:21:43.229 -25:59:49.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0173 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:21:40.524 -26:00:19.74
Second-epoch second image center 15:21:43.229 -25:59:49.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01321 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RFpzombOuK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IDmarg6VZW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sOWor4fdoh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mtysanEAa5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits and wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 57360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Loaded 7433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5759 out of 6269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6269 out of 57360 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.410600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.410600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 57360 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.3900 to 239.5974 deg, Dec -31.2822 to -20.4459 deg
Loaded 7433 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5759 out of 6269 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6269 out of 57360 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 49515 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 221.3181 to 239.4991 deg, Dec -31.2629 to -20.5287 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 221.3181 to 239.4991 deg, Dec -31.2629 to -20.5287 deg
Loaded 7347 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5820 out of 6270 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6270 out of 49515 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.2 pix Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
3.4 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
3.4 pix fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
14.5 mag. Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RFpzombOuK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2875, passed=57345
Got 57345 stars (including 54370 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 57345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56836 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56835 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.671 n_q1=226 n_q2=247 n_q3=263 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.IDmarg6VZW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2287, passed=49500
Got 49500 stars (including 47146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.808 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.683 n_q1=241 n_q2=276 n_q3=227 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.453
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -region wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sOWor4fdoh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1831, passed=38379
Got 38379 stars (including 36504 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38379 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=206 n_q2=266 n_q3=246 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mtysanEAa5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1898, passed=38377
Got 38377 stars (including 36438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 38377 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013063 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010450 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37742 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.526 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.353 n_q1=205 n_q2=270 n_q3=246 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-10-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0092.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_231244_TTUQ1b1x1_892209_Zt6PAyLD/wcs_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:13:42.10 -27:21:55.0: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:52:55.15 -25:07:56.2: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:47:45.04 -26:58:51.0: 12.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:50:15.96 -25:21:57.5: 12.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:12:48.45 -30:48:13.4: 13.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:17:22.20 -21:01:10.4: 13.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:52:26.91 -24:53:20.8: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:13:42.10 -27:21:55.0: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:13:42.10 -27:21:55.0: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0351 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:52:55.15 -25:07:56.2: 13.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:47:45.04 -26:58:51.0: 12.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:55.15 -25:07:56.2: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4750 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:50:15.96 -25:21:57.5: 12.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:45.04 -26:58:51.0: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3512 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:12:48.45 -30:48:13.4: 13.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:15.96 -25:21:57.5: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1902 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:48.45 -30:48:13.4: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3353 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:17:22.20 -21:01:10.4: 13.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:17:22.20 -21:01:10.4: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.9334 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:52:26.91 -24:53:20.8: 14.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:34:23.46 -26:41:19.4: 14.74 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:55:30.86 -23:01:32.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:52:04.23 -21:17:01.6: 14.32 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:55:24.03 -23:40:44.4: 14.03 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:49:57.86 -26:28:54.1: 13.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:49:35.39 -21:30:37.6: 14.13 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:52:15.72 -21:41:02.4: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:47:42.70 -25:54:16.5: 13.99 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:34:23.46 -26:41:19.4: 14.73 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:55:30.86 -23:01:32.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:30.86 -23:01:32.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:34:23.46 -26:41:19.4: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.3074 delta=1.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:52:04.23 -21:17:01.6: 14.59 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:04.23 -21:17:01.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7016 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:50:09.25 -25:08:27.2: 13.82 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:55:24.03 -23:40:44.4: 14.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:49:57.86 -26:28:54.1: 13.89 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:24.03 -23:40:44.4: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5249 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:57.86 -26:28:54.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5305 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:49:35.39 -21:30:37.6: 13.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:52:15.72 -21:41:02.4: 13.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:35.39 -21:30:37.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7619 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:15.72 -21:41:02.4: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6793 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:47:42.70 -25:54:16.5: 14.03 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:47:42.70 -25:54:16.5: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5651 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:50:09.25 -25:08:27.2: 14.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:09.25 -25:08:27.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7632 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:52:48.07 -23:01:29.8: 14.24 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:54:27.25 -25:11:46.8: 14.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:53:58.80 -25:48:19.1: 13.93 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:52:06.58 -23:21:17.4: 14.52 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:53:32.52 -21:15:55.4: 14.07 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:52:42.01 -21:42:05.2: 14.36 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:52:48.07 -23:01:29.8: 14.21 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:52:48.07 -23:01:29.8: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7892 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:43:16.65 -21:18:40.0: 14.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:54:27.25 -25:11:46.8: 14.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:52:23.16 -21:22:57.4: 14.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:53:58.80 -25:48:19.1: 14.15 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:27.25 -25:11:46.8: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6670 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:58.80 -25:48:19.1: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6747 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:53:32.52 -21:15:55.4: 14.23 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:52:06.58 -23:21:17.4: 14.57 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:32.52 -21:15:55.4: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7498 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:06.58 -23:21:17.4: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.8210 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:52:42.01 -21:42:05.2: 14.39 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:42.01 -21:42:05.2: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.9826 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:43:16.65 -21:18:40.0: 14.31 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:52:23.16 -21:22:57.4: 14.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:16.65 -21:18:40.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8298 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:23.16 -21:22:57.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9386 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:53:15.18 -22:14:49.3: 14.48 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:50:37.35 -21:24:37.0: 14.28 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:36:44.28 -22:23:03.0: 14.53 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:53:19.02 -21:43:14.4: 14.23 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:53:06.14 -23:40:23.1: 14.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:51:43.55 -21:53:14.6: 14.23 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:50:01.51 -21:38:13.3: 14.01 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:53:15.18 -22:14:49.3: 14.78 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:15.18 -22:14:49.3: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=13.8400 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:51:42.08 -23:33:13.4: 14.02 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:45:00.19 -24:25:36.0: 14.16 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:50:37.35 -21:24:37.0: 14.35 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:37.35 -21:24:37.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0901 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:36:44.28 -22:23:03.0: 14.90 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:44.28 -22:23:03.0: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.1026 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:53:19.02 -21:43:14.4: 14.09 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:53:06.14 -23:40:23.1: 14.36 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:53:19.02 -21:43:14.4: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9800 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:53:06.14 -23:40:23.1: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7742 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:51:43.55 -21:53:14.6: 14.11 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:50:01.51 -21:38:13.3: 14.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:43.55 -21:53:14.6: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7943 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:01.51 -21:38:13.3: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7266 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:51:42.08 -23:33:13.4: 14.35 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:45:00.19 -24:25:36.0: 14.28 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:42.08 -23:33:13.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.9080 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:00.19 -24:25:36.0: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8781 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:51:31.46 -20:44:07.3: 14.36 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:51:34.70 -21:37:38.1: 14.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:46:16.99 -21:18:15.0: 14.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:54:53.71 -21:48:53.4: 14.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:50:38.65 -23:08:36.2: 14.59 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:55:11.86 -22:57:52.6: 14.16 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:42:43.58 -21:42:28.8: 14.58 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:51:31.46 -20:44:07.3: 14.45 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:51:31.46 -20:44:07.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8340 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:51:34.70 -21:37:38.1: 14.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 14:54:14.20 -21:20:13.0: 14.33 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:55:08.22 -23:56:00.5: 14.20 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:46:16.99 -21:18:15.0: 14.50 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:34.70 -21:37:38.1: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1100 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:16.99 -21:18:15.0: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.9672 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:54:53.71 -21:48:53.4: 14.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:50:38.65 -23:08:36.2: 14.32 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:53.71 -21:48:53.4: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.9089 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:38.65 -23:08:36.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.9395 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:55:11.86 -22:57:52.6: 14.66 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:42:43.58 -21:42:28.8: 14.09 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:11.86 -22:57:52.6: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7899 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:43.58 -21:42:28.8: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1572 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 14:54:14.20 -21:20:13.0: 14.31 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:55:08.22 -23:56:00.5: 14.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:54:14.20 -21:20:13.0: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8729 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:55:08.22 -23:56:00.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0597 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:27:06.03 -23:54:39.8: 15.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:40:58.99 -23:13:04.5: 14.37 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:49:37.97 -24:27:17.1: 14.37 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:01:36.19 -22:36:46.8: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:38:16.28 -26:05:33.1: 14.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:12:58.46 -20:51:27.2: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:27:06.03 -23:54:39.8: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:49:52.97 -22:47:40.7: 14.79 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:40:58.99 -23:13:04.5: 14.47 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:33:36.86 -24:28:25.7: 14.29 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:58.99 -23:13:04.5: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.0467 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:49:37.97 -24:27:17.1: 14.30 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:37.97 -24:27:17.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0838 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:01:36.19 -22:36:46.8: 14.17 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:01:36.19 -22:36:46.8: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1106 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:38:16.28 -26:05:33.1: 14.90 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:12:58.46 -20:51:27.2: 14.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:38:16.28 -26:05:33.1: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.8403 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:12:58.46 -20:51:27.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0794 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:49:52.97 -22:47:40.7: 14.77 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:52.97 -22:47:40.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.1088 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:34:55.69 -24:10:34.3: 14.34 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:33:36.86 -24:28:25.7: 14.58 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:36.86 -24:28:25.7: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1914 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:45:54.59 -22:56:05.2: 14.55 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:34:55.69 -24:10:34.3: 14.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:55.69 -24:10:34.3: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1022 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:18:45.30 -23:22:20.1: 14.51 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:45:54.59 -22:56:05.2: 14.42 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:54.59 -22:56:05.2: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.0074 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:18:45.30 -23:22:20.1: 14.76 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:18:45.30 -23:22:20.1: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.2224 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-18_04-03-20_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0164.fits at 15:48:09.69 -24:14:29.7: 13.57 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_00-17-04_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits at 15:48:09.69 -24:14:29.7: 13.42 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:48:09.69 -24:14:29.7: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.1976 delta=1.29 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out72398.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18996.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72266.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72716.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71306_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71306_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71308_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71308_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71318_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71318_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71326_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71326_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71327_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71327_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:48:48.88 -29:41:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71330_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71330_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:33.35 -24:07:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71386_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71386_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:38.38 -29:28:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71492_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71492_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:39.15 -22:53:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71799_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71799_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71844_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71844_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:40.89 -28:39:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71846_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71846_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:02.51 -24:08:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71989_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 71989_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72040_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72040_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:07:24.45 -25:36:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72064_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72064_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:30:04.14 -30:52:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72266_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 72266_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72303_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72303_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:30:31.53 -25:17:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72316_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72316_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:14.56 -23:29:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72331_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72331_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:24:10.82 -22:55:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72398_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72398_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:34:23.46 -26:41:19.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.787 6237539536076153728 233.59780007021 -26.68850833040 12.1811 10.3598 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.787#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72405_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72405_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72438_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72438_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72441_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72441_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72470_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72470_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72497_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72497_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72501_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72501_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72506_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72506_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72528_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72528_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72537_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72537_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72538_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72538_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:57:06.60 -21:33:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72541_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72541_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72553_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72553_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72565_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72565_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:29:06.48 -21:35:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72569_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72569_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72581_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72581_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72585_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72585_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72588_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72588_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72589_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72589_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72596_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72596_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72618_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72618_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:57.11 -21:29:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72640_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72640_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72645_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72645_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72648_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72648_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72649_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72649_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72652_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72652_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72654_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72654_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72663_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72663_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72667_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72667_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72668_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72668_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72675_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72675_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72678_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72678_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72684_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72684_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72686_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72686_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72692_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72692_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72695_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72695_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72698_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72698_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72704_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72704_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72716_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 72716_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72721_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72721_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72722_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72722_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:52:05.69 -21:56:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72730_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72730_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72731_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72731_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72737_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72737_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72740_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72740_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72741_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72741_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72757_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72757_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:53:24.39 -21:28:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72777_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72777_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72779_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72779_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72781_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72781_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72806_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 72806_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67930_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 67930_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:41.51 -25:17:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67698_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 67698_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.04 -29:15:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67430_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 67430_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:12.85 -30:38:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67428_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 67428_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:52:33.04 -30:04:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43305_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 43305_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:46.30 -30:14:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55044_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 55044_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:20.28 -27:56:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01857_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 01857_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:08:10.66 -21:10:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18996_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
Preparing report for the candidate 18996_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50195_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 50195_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:48:24.73 -28:43:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31636_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 31636_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:01.79 -26:42:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27395_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 27395_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:52.85 -25:58:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68320_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093
The candidate 68320_fd_Lib-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_23-11-18_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0093 did not pass the final checks