This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.93 00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7
115.78119 -9.82717 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 2.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 9" Gaia DR3 396055912372750976
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.950 G 15.990 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7: 15.44 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7: 15.64 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.21
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 05 03.08 +52 23 57.7 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 396055912372750976,2461211.9235,11.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 396055912372750976 20260620.4235 11.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 10.59 23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6
114.67955 -8.23114 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 23 55 50.35 +53 44 50.6 10.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,10.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 10.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.04 00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3
116.43445 -7.10056 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 2.7 pix
The object was found in VSX10" FK Cas
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.600 pg < 18.000 pg 2432820.00000 333.600000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 06 03.08 +55 11 51.3 11.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
FK Cas,2461211.9235,11.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
FK Cas 20260620.4235 11.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.35 00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4
117.90323 -12.37034 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 20 41.41 +50 12 03.4 11.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,11.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 11.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.65 00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7
118.46955 -10.84410 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 23 03.45 +51 46 53.7 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,11.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 11.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.78 00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7
117.48449 -8.88917 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 15 03.86 +53 35 50.7 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.80 23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8
114.90158 -5.21172 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 2.7 pix
The object was found in VSX12" DH Cas
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 pg < 16.800 pg 2427942.00000 322.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 23 52 39.52 +56 44 26.8 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DH Cas,2461211.9235,11.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DH Cas 20260620.4235 11.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.86 00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5
116.46196 -8.98274 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 08 27.34 +53 20 53.5 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.87 00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4
116.98679 -8.71063 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 11 36.16 +53 42 02.4 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.84 00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8
117.12931 -7.36548 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 420605258247848704 | 00:11:10.38 +55:03:01.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 11 06.91 +55 03 04.8 11.8 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 420605258247848704,2461211.9235,11.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 420605258247848704 20260620.4235 11.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.92 00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2
117.40689 -9.21476 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 419247361391884544 | 00:14:47.12 +53:15:56.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 14 52.04 +53 15 51.2 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 419247361391884544,2461211.9235,11.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 419247361391884544 20260620.4235 11.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.96 00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8
118.48517 -10.82986 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 23 08.75 +51 47 50.8 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.02 00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0
118.74777 -9.41298 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 23 48.60 +53 14 03.0 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.02 00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9
116.97525 -7.50180 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 420599004775516032 | 00:10:16.17 +54:53:28.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F6 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 10 12.90 +54 53 32.9 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 420599004775516032,2461211.9235,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 420599004775516032 20260620.4235 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.08 00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3
119.15923 -11.61040 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3: 15.38 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 27 52.78 +51 05 19.3 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.99 00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5
115.42504 -9.06164 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 01 49.35 +53 05 07.5 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.05 00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7
117.81613 -8.85411 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 419343706094793088 | 00:17:17.59 +53:40:19.2 (Gaia DR3) | VAR (local) | K (local) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7: 15.35 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 17 13.27 +53 40 38.7 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 419343706094793088,2461211.9235,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 419343706094793088 20260620.4235 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 11.99 00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1
115.65836 -8.51359 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.2" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.611+/-0.087 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 02 38.08 +53 40 03.1 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.07 00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2
117.88764 -11.81880 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 20 10.17 +50 44 47.2 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.01 00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8
117.10830 -8.74864 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 12 26.63 +53 40 53.8 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.08 00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9
118.01434 -9.15815 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 18 47.73 +53 24 05.9 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.13 00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1
119.07435 -7.91487 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 419658922336230528 | 00:24:55.04 +54:45:13.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 24 54.76 +54 45 29.1 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 419658922336230528,2461211.9235,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 419658922336230528 20260620.4235 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.07 00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0
116.32222 -9.39466 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 08 00.79 +52 55 08.0 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.10 00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1
115.31464 -12.18136 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 3.0 pix
The object was found in VSX16" Gaia DR3 393942616669670784
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.460 G 17.580 G K
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 04 55.21 +50 00 04.1 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 393942616669670784,2461211.9235,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 393942616669670784 20260620.4235 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.11 00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0
116.64704 -8.44108 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 09 03.80 +53 54 46.0 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.12 00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1
117.83687 -9.17487 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J004.3938+53.3634 | 00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 17 38.71 +53 21 44.1 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J004.3938+53.3634,2461211.9235,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J004.3938+53.3634 20260620.4235 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.11 00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9
116.29009 -8.77197 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 07 05.44 +53 31 36.9 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.08 23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4
114.90665 -7.84768 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 23 56 46.45 +54 10 12.4 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.13 00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5
118.57278 -6.94249 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 20 41.09 +55 40 07.5 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.12 00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4
116.67114 -8.84031 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 09 39.94 +53 31 22.4 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.11 00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9
116.90932 -9.59179 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 2.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9: 15.36 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.27
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 12 00.68 +52 49 05.9 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.11 00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5
117.90355 -8.11268 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 419766154774512896 | 00:17:12.80 +54:25:17.4 (Gaia DR3) | DSCT/GDOR (local) | (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 17 07.67 +54 25 25.5 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 419766154774512896,2461211.9235,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 419766154774512896 20260620.4235 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.08 23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2
115.28055 -8.31136 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J359.9608+53.7896 | 23:59:54.01 +53:46:59.8 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F6 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2: 15.38 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2: 15.24 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.19
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 23 59 53.35 +53 47 34.2 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J359.9608+53.7896,2461211.9235,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J359.9608+53.7896 20260620.4235 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.12 00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8
115.43948 -8.36202 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 396276428875775232 | 00:01:01.08 +53:45:51.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8: 15.20 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 01 00.04 +53 46 27.8 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 396276428875775232,2461211.9235,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 396276428875775232 20260620.4235 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 12.14 23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3
114.38729 -8.75179 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 3.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 23 54 42.46 +53 10 34.3 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,12.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 12.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 14.37 00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2
119.14058 -6.45424 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 24 17.60 +56 13 03.2 14.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,14.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 14.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 14.22 00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7
119.14314 -5.72297 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 23 44.66 +56 56 41.7 14.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 14.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 14.72 00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5
119.16038 -6.22579 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.8" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 24 15.60 +56 26 48.5 14.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 14.59 23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2
111.94456 -7.39604 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 3.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 23 36 38.80 +53 52 21.2 14.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.4235 2461211.9235 14.87 00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1
115.25195 -10.84495 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.6" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.4235* 00 02 57.83 +51 18 09.1 14.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461211.9235,14.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260620.4235 14.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461211.92384792 20.06.2026 10:10:10.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 65
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27429
Objects passed selection criteria: 27341
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 21650.8
Average stars matched: 19339.8 (89.326 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128412 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 06:51:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461211.92384792 20.06.2026 10:10:10.460 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 706
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 244 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 213907
Objects passed selection criteria: 213200
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 172086
Average stars matched: 153700 (89.3155 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1968932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 07:25:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.92320941
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Image size: 926.8'x616.3' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0298 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Image size: 926.8'x616.3' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.009 +54:01:17.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 23:59:56.009 +54:01:17.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:56.009 +54:01:17.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00471 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o6nHRYHic2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o7wCJmki2l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vtx2pJRS8c
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uHqZ6Q9mjs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.842700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.842700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 29065 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6373 to +59.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6373 to 59.3623 deg
Loaded 163448 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14807 out of 16429 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16429 out of 29065 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.o6nHRYHic2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3209, passed=29225
Got 29225 stars (including 25982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4494 through 0 to 15.3164, gap 15.3164 to 345.4494
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4490 through 0 to 15.3182, gap 15.3182 to 345.4490
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=194 n_q2=269 n_q3=218 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.o7wCJmki2l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3195, passed=29065
Got 29065 stars (including 25829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4479 through 0 to 15.3165, gap 15.3165 to 345.4479
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4484 through 0 to 15.3183, gap 15.3183 to 345.4484
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=196 n_q2=274 n_q3=213 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vtx2pJRS8c (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2748, passed=28951
Got 28951 stars (including 26176 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28951 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012872 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010298 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0821 through 0 to 14.9840, gap 14.9840 to 345.0821
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 340 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 256 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.19"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 242 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.02"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0905 through 0 to 14.9931, gap 14.9931 to 345.0905
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 390 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.97"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.35"
Excluding outliers - 320 stars left (next iteration limit 266)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits N_match=320 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.747 sigma_q1_arcsec=28.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=27.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.962 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.242 n_q1=33 n_q2=35 n_q3=82 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.425
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uHqZ6Q9mjs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2755, passed=28570
Got 28570 stars (including 25789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28570 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012872 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010298 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0823 through 0 to 14.9843, gap 14.9843 to 345.0823
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 255 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.10"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.94"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0900 through 0 to 14.9924, gap 14.9924 to 345.0900
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 389 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.89"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.96"
Excluding outliers - 315 stars left (next iteration limit 264)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits N_match=315 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.632 sigma_q1_arcsec=25.532 sigma_q2_arcsec=29.215 sigma_q3_arcsec=6.099 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.926 n_q1=30 n_q2=34 n_q3=83 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.512
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.147
ref2=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.538 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits sigma_overall=11.747 worst_q_ratio=2.425
new2=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits sigma_overall=11.632 worst_q_ratio=2.512
reference average sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.2195
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits) flagged: sigma=11.747 (ref avg 0.521), ratio=2.425 (ref avg 1.2195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 27690 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3834338.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3834338.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 28.5813 (2.58631e+12), 8 match, 0 conflict, 19 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (359.987,54.0172), pixel scale 5.93191 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+----+--++-+---+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3834338.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3834338.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.988557, 54.017993) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:57.254, +54:01:04.775).
Field size: 15.6074 x 10.4338 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.99541 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> 'fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 20 07:01 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 20 07:01 out3834338.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3834338.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3834338.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.4467 degrees of RA,Dec (359.99,54.0188)
log-odds ratio 28.5813 (2.58631e+12), 8 match, 0 conflict, 19 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (359.987,54.0172), pixel scale 5.93191 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+--+----+--++-+---+---+(best)-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3834338.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3834338.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.988557, 54.017993) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:57.254, +54:01:04.775).
Field size: 15.6074 x 10.4338 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.99541 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 20 07:01 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 20 07:01 out3834338.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1551, 946.733] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3.1809
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 2.53288
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.84323
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1551, 946.733] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3.1809
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 2.53288
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.84323
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-47.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-46.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-45.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-44.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-43.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-42.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-41.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-40.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-39.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-38.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-37.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-36.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-35.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-34.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-33.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-32.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-31.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-30.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-29.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-28.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-27.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-26.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-25.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-24.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-23.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-22.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-21.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-20.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-19.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-18.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-17.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-16.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-15.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-14.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-13.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-12.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-47.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-46.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-45.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-44.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-43.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-42.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-41.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-40.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-39.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-38.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-37.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-36.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-35.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-34.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-33.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-32.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-31.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-30.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-29.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-28.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-27.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-26.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-25.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-24.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-23.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-22.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-21.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-20.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-19.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-18.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-17.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-16.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-15.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-14.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-13.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-12.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-47.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-46.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-45.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-44.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-43.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-42.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-41.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-40.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-39.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-38.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-37.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-36.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-35.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-34.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-33.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-32.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-31.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-30.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-29.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-28.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-27.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-26.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-25.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-24.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-23.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-22.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-21.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-20.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-19.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-18.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-17.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-16.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-15.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-14.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-13.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-12.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 21-30).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Image size: 926.8'x616.3' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 28951 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3970170.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2748, passed=28951
Got 28951 stars (including 26176 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28951 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012872 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010298 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0821 through 0 to 14.9840, gap 14.9840 to 345.0821
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 340 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 256 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.19"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 242 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.02"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0905 through 0 to 14.9931, gap 14.9931 to 345.0905
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 390 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.97"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 320 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9221 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.35"
Excluding outliers - 320 stars left (next iteration limit 266)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits N_match=320 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.747 sigma_q1_arcsec=28.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=27.629 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.962 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.242 n_q1=33 n_q2=35 n_q3=82 n_q4=170 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.425
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits): sigma 11.747->11.747, ratio 2.425->2.425; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits) flagged: sigma=11.632 (ref avg 0.521), ratio=2.512 (ref avg 1.2195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 27322 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3973784.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3973784.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 27.2814 (7.0496e+11), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (359.981,54.0199), pixel scale 5.9319 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+-------+---+++---+(best)-----+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3973784.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3973784.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.981985, 54.020693) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:55.676, +54:01:14.495).
Field size: 15.6073 x 10.4338 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 4.00521 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits' -> 'fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 20 07:10 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 20 07:10 out3973784.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out3973784.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out3973784.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.4467 degrees of RA,Dec (359.983,54.0215)
log-odds ratio 27.2814 (7.0496e+11), 7 match, 0 conflict, 16 distractors, 25 index.
RA,Dec = (359.981,54.0199), pixel scale 5.9319 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+-------+---+++---+(best)-----+-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out3973784.solved to indicate this.
Field: out3973784.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.981985, 54.020693) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:55.676, +54:01:14.495).
Field size: 15.6073 x 10.4338 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 4.00521 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 20 07:10 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 20 07:10 out3973784.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.155, 946.731] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.155, 946.731] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-47.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-46.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-45.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-44.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-43.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-42.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-41.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-40.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-39.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-38.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-37.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-36.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-35.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-34.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-33.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-32.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-31.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-30.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-29.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-28.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-27.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-26.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-25.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-24.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-23.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-22.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-21.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-20.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-19.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-18.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-17.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-16.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-15.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-14.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-13.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-12.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-47.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-46.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-45.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-44.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-43.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-42.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-41.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-40.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-39.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-38.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-37.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-36.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-35.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-34.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-33.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-32.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-31.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-30.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-29.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-28.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-27.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-26.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-25.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-24.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-23.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-22.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-21.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-20.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-19.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-18.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-17.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-16.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-15.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-14.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-13.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-12.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-47.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-46.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-45.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-44.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-43.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-42.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-41.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-40.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-39.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-38.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-37.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-36.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-35.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-34.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-33.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-32.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-31.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-30.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-29.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-28.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-27.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-26.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-25.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-24.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-23.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-22.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-21.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-20.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-19.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-18.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-17.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-16.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-15.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-14.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-13.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-12.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5203-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 21-30).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Image size: 926.8'x616.3' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.009 +54:01:17.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 28570 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky380728.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2755, passed=28570
Got 28570 stars (including 25789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28570 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012872 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010298 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0823 through 0 to 14.9843, gap 14.9843 to 345.0823
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 255 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 181 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.10"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 240 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.94"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0900 through 0 to 14.9924, gap 14.9924 to 345.0900
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 389 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 318 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.89"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 315 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9081 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.96"
Excluding outliers - 315 stars left (next iteration limit 264)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits N_match=315 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.632 sigma_q1_arcsec=25.532 sigma_q2_arcsec=29.215 sigma_q3_arcsec=6.099 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.926 n_q1=30 n_q2=34 n_q3=83 n_q4=168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.512
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits): sigma 11.632->11.632, ratio 2.512->2.512; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=11.747 -- 22.55x the reference average (0.521); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=11.632 -- 22.33x the reference average (0.521); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.512 -- 2.06x the reference average (1.2195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468_astrometric_residuals.png (320 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 5.79 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469_astrometric_residuals.png (315 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 5.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:53:15.23 +56:15:04.9: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:05:17.25 +56:39:28.9: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:12:47.38 +57:12:49.6: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:50.41 +54:00:28.1: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7: 15.44 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7: 15.64 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:50.41 +54:00:28.1: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:12:47.38 +57:12:49.6: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:53:15.23 +56:15:04.9: 11.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:05:17.25 +56:39:28.9: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=11.9250 delta=3.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:50.41 +54:00:28.1: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9095 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:47.38 +57:12:49.6: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2272 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:53:15.23 +56:15:04.9: ref_mag=11.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4500 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:17.25 +56:39:28.9: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8656 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7: 14.46 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=11.6502 delta=2.89 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.8006 delta=1.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.8421 delta=2.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:05:40.07 +54:22:44.2: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:05:40.07 +54:22:44.2: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:40.07 +54:22:44.2: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8171 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:49:25.08 +55:38:54.7: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:49:25.08 +55:38:54.7: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:49:25.08 +55:38:54.7: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8438 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9222 delta=1.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:41.18 +56:23:58.8: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:41.18 +56:23:58.8: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:41.18 +56:23:58.8: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9254 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0: 14.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.0137 delta=2.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.0152 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3: 15.38 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=12.0790 delta=3.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7: 15.08 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7: 15.35 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.0495 delta=3.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:47:42.59 +57:49:48.7: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:47:42.59 +57:49:48.7: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:42.59 +57:49:48.7: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9931 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1292 delta=1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:03:44.56 +55:00:45.8: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:03:44.56 +55:00:45.8: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:44.56 +55:00:45.8: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0579 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1: 15.50 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1: 15.55 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4: 15.08 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.0797 delta=2.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9: 15.36 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.36 +/- 0.27
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9: ref_mag=15.36 +/- 0.27 new_mean_mag=12.1115 delta=3.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:21:08.94 +57:49:25.7: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:21:08.94 +57:49:25.7: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:08.94 +57:49:25.7: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1206 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1126 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2: 15.38 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:47:40.80 +57:49:23.0: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2: 15.24 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=12.0803 delta=3.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:47:40.80 +57:49:23.0: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:40.80 +57:49:23.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0766 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:15:58.60 +57:26:11.8: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:15:58.60 +57:26:11.8: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:58.60 +57:26:11.8: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1093 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:05:25.32 +54:33:35.8: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:05:25.32 +54:33:35.8: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.17 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:25.32 +54:33:35.8: ref_mag=12.17 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1121 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:31.62 +57:27:04.8: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:31.62 +57:27:04.8: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:31.62 +57:27:04.8: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1035 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8: 15.05 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8: 15.20 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=12.1178 delta=3.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:00:10.58 +54:10:55.2: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:00:10.58 +54:10:55.2: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:10.58 +54:10:55.2: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0958 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:45:00.41 +57:58:25.6: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:45:00.41 +57:58:25.6: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:00.41 +57:58:25.6: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0212 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:58:54.67 +57:21:53.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:58:54.67 +57:21:53.0: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:58:54.67 +57:21:53.0: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1391 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31481.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33017.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33523.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34289.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34743.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34947.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34977.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35030.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35043.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35271.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35310.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35514.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35579.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35586.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35640.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35645.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35679.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35723.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35749.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35772.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35859.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35863.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35880.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35912.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35963.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35965.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35976.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35977.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35986.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36003.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36027.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36164.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36310.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 62s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 27s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31479_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 31479_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31480_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 31480_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31481_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 31481_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 31482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31485_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 31485_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32457_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 32457_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32698_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 32698_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:41.59 +55:32:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33017_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 33017_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33274_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 33274_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33523_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 33523_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34018_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 34018_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:44:33.02 +56:34:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 34289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34462_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 34462_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:50:45.01 +53:34:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34594_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 34594_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:20.05 +54:08:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34743_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 34743_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34947_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 34947_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34966_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 34966_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34977_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 34977_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35043_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35043_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35064_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 35064_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35133_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 35133_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35271_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35271_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35310_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35310_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35421_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 35421_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35514_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35514_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35586_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35586_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35640_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35640_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35645_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35645_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35679_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35679_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35723_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35723_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35769_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 35769_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35772_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35772_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35859_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35859_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35863_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35863_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35876_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 35876_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35912_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35912_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35963_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35963_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35970_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35970_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35976_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35976_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35977_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35977_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35986_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 35986_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36000_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36000_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36003_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 36003_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 36027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36041_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36041_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36082_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36082_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36127_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36127_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36152_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36152_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36158_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36158_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36164_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 36164_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36210_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36210_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36288_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 36288_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36310_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 36310_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 09534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 21888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:24.46 +51:26:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 2s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 91s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7
23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6
00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3
00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4
00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7
00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7
23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8
00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5
00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4
00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8
00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2
00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8
00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0
00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9
00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3
00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5
00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7
00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1
00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2
00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8
00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9
00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1
00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0
00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1
00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0
00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1
00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9
23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4
00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5
00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4
00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9
00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5
23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2
00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8
23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Image size: 926.8'x616.3' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0298 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Image size: 926.8'x616.3' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:56.009 +54:01:17.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 23:59:56.009 +54:01:17.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0311 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:57.586 +54:01:07.73
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:56.009 +54:01:17.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00471 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4f88dJWOAe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y8QHwbtE0s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8jMsH3dNHw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oNcgp47z33
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.676500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.676500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 217552 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6349 to +59.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6349 to 59.3691 deg
Loaded 163556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11613 out of 17712 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17712 out of 217552 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 587 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.4f88dJWOAe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=32857, passed=217571
Got 217571 stars (including 184418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4355 through 0 to 15.4567, gap 15.4567 to 345.4355
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4349 through 0 to 15.4584, gap 15.4584 to 345.4349
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=213 n_q2=264 n_q3=237 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y8QHwbtE0s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=32499, passed=217519
Got 217519 stars (including 184678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4449 through 0 to 15.4097, gap 15.4097 to 345.4449
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4450 through 0 to 15.4115, gap 15.4115 to 345.4450
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=220 n_q2=266 n_q3=235 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8jMsH3dNHw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=60, blended=29230, passed=200893
Got 200893 stars (including 171438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 200893 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012872 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010298 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0121 through 0 to 15.0290, gap 15.0290 to 345.0121
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.3 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 322 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 224 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.22"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 210 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43000 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.06"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0255 through 0 to 15.0449, gap 15.0449 to 345.0255
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 372 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.05"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 61308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.75"
Excluding outliers - 312 stars left (next iteration limit 231)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits N_match=312 sigma_overall_arcsec=13.806 sigma_q1_arcsec=32.754 sigma_q2_arcsec=25.726 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.083 sigma_q4_arcsec=12.721 n_q1=28 n_q2=32 n_q3=81 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.372
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oNcgp47z33 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=75, blended=29046, passed=201540
Got 201540 stars (including 172254 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 201540 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 926.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 926.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012872 (46.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010298 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0124 through 0 to 15.0290, gap 15.0290 to 345.0124
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 311 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 218 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 10.00"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 203 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0129 through 0 to 15.0386, gap 15.0386 to 345.0129
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 362 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 296 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43121 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 295 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 59032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.39"
Excluding outliers - 295 stars left (next iteration limit 223)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits N_match=295 sigma_overall_arcsec=16.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=30.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=31.909 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=14.787 n_q1=33 n_q2=28 n_q3=80 n_q4=154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.933
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-09-15_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0468.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_063703_TTUQ2b1x1_2169034_yqRgNYH4/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:36:29.93 +53:55:46.8: 15.49 +/- 0.32 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:36:29.93 +53:55:46.8: 15.61 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.54 +/- 0.24
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:29.93 +53:55:46.8: ref_mag=15.54 +/- 0.24 new_mean_mag=14.7733 delta=0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:22.60 +54:08:58.7: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:22.60 +54:08:58.7: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:02:22.60 +54:08:58.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1307 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244387.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out270938.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out279704.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out281524.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out281744.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 33s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244073_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244073_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244087_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244087_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244099_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244099_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244101_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244101_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244112_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244112_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244114_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244114_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244119_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244119_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244126_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244126_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244130_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244130_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244136_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244136_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244146_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244146_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244147_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244147_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244152_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244152_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244154_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244154_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244160_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244160_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244164_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244164_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244177_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244177_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244181_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244181_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244183_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244183_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244186_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244186_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244188_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244188_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244194_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244194_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244195_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244195_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244196_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244196_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244204_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244204_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244205_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244205_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244212_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244212_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244216_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244216_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244223_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244223_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244229_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244229_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244230_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244230_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244237_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244237_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244239_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244239_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244240_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244240_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244241_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244241_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244242_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244242_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244243_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244243_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244252_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244252_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244253_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244253_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244255_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244255_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244263_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244263_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244264_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244264_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244268_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244268_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244272_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244272_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244277_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244277_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244279_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244279_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244282_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244282_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244288_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244288_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244294_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244294_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244296_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244296_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244300_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244300_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244302_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244302_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244303_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244303_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244305_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244305_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244309_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244309_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244312_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244313_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244313_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244314_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244314_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244315_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244315_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244319_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244319_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244320_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244320_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244324_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244324_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244325_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244325_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244328_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244328_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244329_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244329_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244331_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244331_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244332_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244332_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244336_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244336_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244342_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244342_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244343_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244343_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244352_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244352_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244360_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244360_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244362_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244362_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244363_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244363_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244365_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244365_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244366_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244366_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244370_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244370_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244372_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244372_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244373_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244373_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244376_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244376_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244377_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244377_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244379_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244379_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244384_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244384_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244387_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 244387_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244389_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244389_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244393_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244393_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244394_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244394_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244401_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244401_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244406_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244406_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244411_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244411_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244415_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244415_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244420_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244420_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244422_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244422_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244424_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244424_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244425_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244425_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244426_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244426_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244431_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244431_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244433_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244433_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244435_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244435_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244436_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244436_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244439_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244439_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244447_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244447_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244451_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244451_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244453_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244453_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244457_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244457_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244458_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244458_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244465_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244465_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244466_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244466_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244467_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244467_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244468_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244468_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244472_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244472_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244474_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244474_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244475_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244475_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244480_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244480_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244484_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244484_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244491_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244491_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244494_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244494_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244495_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244495_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244500_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244500_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244503_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244503_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244509_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244509_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244514_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244514_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244515_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244515_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244517_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244517_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244518_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244518_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244519_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244519_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244521_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244521_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244522_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244522_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244523_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244523_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244527_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244527_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244528_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244528_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244530_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244530_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244535_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244535_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244536_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244536_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244539_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244539_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244540_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244540_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244541_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244541_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244543_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244543_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244544_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244544_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244545_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244545_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244547_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244547_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244549_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244549_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244552_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244552_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244556_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244556_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244563_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244563_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244565_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244565_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244568_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244568_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244569_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244569_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244571_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244571_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244575_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244575_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244577_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244577_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244580_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244580_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244582_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244582_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244583_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244583_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244585_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244585_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244586_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244586_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244590_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244590_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244592_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244592_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244594_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244594_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244595_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244595_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244596_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244596_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244597_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244597_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244598_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244598_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244600_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244600_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244601_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244601_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244603_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 244603_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245704_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 245704_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 245752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 246185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247292_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 247292_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:23:03.00 +51:46:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 247752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 248278_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249011_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 249011_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249339_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 249339_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250106_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 250106_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250128_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 250128_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 250884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 251102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251558_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 251558_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 251878_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 252350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252511_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 252511_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252650_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 252650_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252882_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 252882_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 252884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252979_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 252979_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 253888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254703_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 254703_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254723_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 254723_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254748_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 254748_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255824_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 255824_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255910_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 255910_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256069_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 256069_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 256259_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256277_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 256277_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256737_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 256737_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256788_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 256788_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 257100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257105_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 257105_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257608_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 257608_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257663_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 257663_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 258044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258152_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 258152_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258158_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 258158_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258342_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 258342_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 258455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 258886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259071_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 259071_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259580_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 259580_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260158_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 260158_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 260289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260371_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 260371_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260491_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 260491_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260874_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 260874_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261060_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 261060_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 261202_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261392_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 261392_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261428_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 261428_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261463_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 261463_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261658_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 261658_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262049_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262049_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262360_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262360_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262364_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262364_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262399_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262399_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262618_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262618_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262691_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262691_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262726_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262726_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262842_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262842_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 262861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 263094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 263116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263271_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 263271_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263328_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 263328_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263355_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 263355_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263792_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 263792_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264486_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264486_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264585_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264585_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264587_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264587_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264608_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264608_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264610_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264610_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264934_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264934_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264956_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 264956_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 265131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265142_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 265142_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265445_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 265445_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265481_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 265481_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265502_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 265502_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265652_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 265652_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265662_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 265662_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265785_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 265785_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266087_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 266087_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266293_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 266293_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266552_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 266552_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266724_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 266724_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266920_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 266920_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267163_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267322_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267322_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267333_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267333_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267362_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267362_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267491_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267491_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267674_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267674_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267787_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267787_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267881_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267881_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267918_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 267918_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268016_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 268016_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268225_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 268225_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268286_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 268286_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 268289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268407_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 268407_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268610_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 268610_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268643_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 268643_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268729_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 268729_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269084_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 269084_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269478_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 269478_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 269482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269720_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 269720_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269883_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 269883_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270121_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 270121_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 270326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270523_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 270523_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270657_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 270657_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270687_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 270687_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270731_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 270731_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270762_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 270762_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 270938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 271172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271233_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 271233_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 271430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271863_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 271863_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272061_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 272061_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272287_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 272287_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272439_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 272439_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272485_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 272485_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272753_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 272753_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273048_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273048_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273120_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273120_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273134_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273134_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273272_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273272_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273282_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273282_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273322_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273322_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273377_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273377_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273400_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273400_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273785_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273785_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273904_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273904_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273961_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273961_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273988_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 273988_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274045_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274045_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274168_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274168_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274364_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274364_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274385_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274385_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274528_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274528_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274672_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274672_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274735_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274735_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274876_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274876_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274957_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274957_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 274965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275007_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275007_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275047_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275047_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275090_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275090_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275194_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275194_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275295_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275295_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275303_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275303_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275327_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275327_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:26:32.09 +56:06:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275465_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275465_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275475_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275475_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275611_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275611_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275969_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 275969_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276049_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276049_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276058_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276058_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276098_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276098_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276113_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276113_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276187_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276187_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276298_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276298_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276373_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276373_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276544_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276544_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276564_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276564_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276738_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276738_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276804_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276897_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276897_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276944_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 276944_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277037_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277037_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277116_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277178_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277178_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277236_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277236_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277326_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277356_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277356_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277532_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277532_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277623_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277623_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277715_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277715_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277757_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277757_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277765_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277765_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277865_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 277865_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278037_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278037_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278172_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278217_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278217_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278238_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278238_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278280_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278280_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278281_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278281_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278323_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278323_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278327_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278327_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278336_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278336_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278342_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278342_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278512_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278512_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278575_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278575_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278651_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278651_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278684_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278684_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278753_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278753_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278921_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278921_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278988_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278988_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278993_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 278993_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279017_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279017_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279033_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279033_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279182_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279182_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279218_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279286_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279286_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279290_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279290_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279356_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279356_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279359_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279359_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279400_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279400_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279481_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279481_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279609_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279609_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279704_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 279704_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279710_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279710_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279730_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279730_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279743_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279743_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279801_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279801_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279819_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279819_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279846_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279846_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279850_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279850_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 279937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280187_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280187_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280228_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280228_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280321_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280321_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280335_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280335_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280380_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280380_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280388_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280388_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280393_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280393_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280482_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280498_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280498_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280640_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280640_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280653_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280653_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280678_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280678_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280685_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280685_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280692_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280692_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280718_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280718_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280760_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280760_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280796_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280796_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280798_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280798_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280844_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280844_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280879_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280879_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280910_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280910_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280924_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280924_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280946_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280946_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280955_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 280955_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281050_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281050_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281052_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281052_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281060_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281060_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281085_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281085_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281135_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281135_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281150_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281150_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281211_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281211_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281290_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281290_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281291_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281291_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281384_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281384_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281396_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281396_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281413_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281413_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281426_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281426_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281477_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281477_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281491_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281491_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281520_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281520_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281524_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 281524_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281586_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281586_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281596_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281596_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281624_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281744_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
Preparing report for the candidate 281744_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281782_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281782_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281783_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281783_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281799_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281799_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281826_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281826_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281934_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281934_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281961_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281961_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281994_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 281994_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282000_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282000_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282052_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282052_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282072_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282072_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282094_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282131_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282229_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282229_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282256_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282256_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282301_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282301_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282332_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282332_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282341_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282341_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282348_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282348_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282369_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282390_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282402_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282402_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282445_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282445_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (56.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282469_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282510_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282510_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282588_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282588_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282598_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282598_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282599_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282599_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282623_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282623_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282639_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282639_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282652_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282652_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282687_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282687_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282705_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282705_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282707_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282707_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282788_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282788_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282805_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282805_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282820_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282820_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282823_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282823_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282870_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282870_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282885_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282885_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282895_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282895_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282952_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282952_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282974_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282974_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282980_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 282980_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283002_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283002_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283014_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283014_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283069_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283069_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283097_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283097_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283098_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283098_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283106_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283106_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283170_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283170_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283175_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283175_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283176_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283176_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283188_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283188_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283197_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283197_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283246_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283246_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283293_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283293_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283324_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283324_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283335_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283335_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283410_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283410_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283440_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283440_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283445_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283445_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283462_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283462_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283493_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283493_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283501_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (52.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283506_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283506_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283547_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283547_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283576_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283576_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283584_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283584_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283593_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283593_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283604_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283604_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (53.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283608_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283608_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283620_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283620_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283666_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283666_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283677_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283677_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283706_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283706_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283719_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283723_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283723_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283835_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283835_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283986_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 283986_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284086_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284086_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284133_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284133_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284151_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284151_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284154_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284154_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284157_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284157_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284201_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284201_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284462_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284462_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284538_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 284538_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 130430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 174810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:23.90 +51:26:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 79234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 58579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 179137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:20:40.83 +50:12:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 125040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71796_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 71796_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 53473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143637_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 143637_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469
The candidate 236140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_05-10-10_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0469 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 40s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7
23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6
00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3
00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4
00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7
00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7
23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8
00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5
00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4
00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8
00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2
00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8
00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0
00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9
00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3
00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5
00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7
00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1
00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2
00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8
00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9
00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1
00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0
00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1
00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0
00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1
00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9
23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4
00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5
00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4
00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9
00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5
23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2
00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8
23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3
00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2
00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7
00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5
23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2
00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1
########### Completed Cas-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7
23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6
00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3
00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4
00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7
00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7
23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8
00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5
00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4
00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8
00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2
00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8
00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0
00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9
00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3
00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5
00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7
00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1
00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2
00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8
00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9
00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1
00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0
00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1
00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0
00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1
00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9
23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4
00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5
00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4
00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9
00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5
23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2
00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8
23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3
00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2
00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7
00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5
23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2
00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1
###################################################################################
00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8 -- not a known variable star
00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5 -- not a known variable star
00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1 -- not a known variable star
00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1 -- not a known variable star
00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1 -- a known variable star
00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7 -- a known variable star
00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3 -- a known variable star
00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9 -- not a known variable star
00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0 -- not a known variable star
00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5 -- not a known variable star
00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0 -- not a known variable star
00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4 -- not a known variable star
00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9 -- not a known variable star
00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8 -- not a known variable star
00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4 -- not a known variable star
00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9 -- not a known variable star
00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8 -- not a known variable star
00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2 -- not a known variable star
00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7 -- not a known variable star
00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5 -- not a known variable star
00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7 -- not a known variable star
00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1 -- not a known variable star
00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9 -- not a known variable star
00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2 -- not a known variable star
00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5 -- not a known variable star
00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4 -- not a known variable star
00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7 -- not a known variable star
00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8 -- not a known variable star
00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7 -- not a known variable star
00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0 -- not a known variable star
00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5 -- not a known variable star
00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2 -- not a known variable star
00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1 -- not a known variable star
00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3 -- not a known variable star
23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2 -- not a known variable star
23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8 -- a known variable star
23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3 -- not a known variable star
23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6 -- not a known variable star
23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4 -- not a known variable star
23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2 -- not a known variable star
Found 36 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
40 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
00:01:00.04 +53:46:27.8
00:01:49.35 +53:05:07.5
00:02:38.08 +53:40:03.1
00:02:57.83 +51:18:09.1
00:04:55.21 +50:00:04.1
00:05:03.08 +52:23:57.7
00:06:03.08 +55:11:51.3
00:07:05.44 +53:31:36.9
00:08:00.79 +52:55:08.0
00:08:27.34 +53:20:53.5
00:09:03.80 +53:54:46.0
00:09:39.94 +53:31:22.4
00:10:12.90 +54:53:32.9
00:11:06.91 +55:03:04.8
00:11:36.16 +53:42:02.4
00:12:00.68 +52:49:05.9
00:12:26.63 +53:40:53.8
00:14:52.04 +53:15:51.2
00:15:03.86 +53:35:50.7
00:17:07.67 +54:25:25.5
00:17:13.27 +53:40:38.7
00:17:38.71 +53:21:44.1
00:18:47.73 +53:24:05.9
00:20:10.17 +50:44:47.2
00:20:41.09 +55:40:07.5
00:20:41.41 +50:12:03.4
00:23:03.45 +51:46:53.7
00:23:08.75 +51:47:50.8
00:23:44.66 +56:56:41.7
00:23:48.60 +53:14:03.0
00:24:15.60 +56:26:48.5
00:24:17.60 +56:13:03.2
00:24:54.76 +54:45:29.1
00:27:52.78 +51:05:19.3
23:36:38.80 +53:52:21.2
23:52:39.52 +56:44:26.8
23:54:42.46 +53:10:34.3
23:55:50.35 +53:44:50.6
23:56:46.45 +54:10:12.4
23:59:53.35 +53:47:34.2
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.92320941 -observatory V36
07:37:51.78 +21:39:44.0 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:42:41.44 +20:15:52.6 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:25:20.27 +18:15:45.0 Mars (1.3mag)
07:58:52.84 +21:03:58.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:29.66 +03:05:10.0 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:03:02.97 +20:33:32.1 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:43.08 +00:19:50.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:34.27 -23:09:23.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:46:02.09 +06:13:19.5 Moon (-9.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 20 06:51 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.92320941:
07:58:50.40 +21:04:08.6 Io (6.2mag)
07:58:58.77 +21:03:38.4 Europa (6.3mag)
07:59:00.58 +21:03:29.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:59:15.83 +21:02:49.6 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:58:26.96 +20:41:56.7 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:58:56.70 +21:03:45.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:58:06.60 +20:52:22.3 Elara (17.6mag)
08:01:39.09 +21:08:59.2 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:04:53.91 +21:06:43.3 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:23.95 +03:05:38.8 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:34.21 +03:05:13.9 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:43.47 +03:07:32.7 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:32.98 +03:05:38.4 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:56.56 +03:05:19.7 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 20 06:51 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.92320941:
17:28:21.52 -35:29:56.0 JWST
18:34:08.56 +21:14:20.6 Chandra
04:18:33.29 +54:46:20.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 20 06:51 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.92320941 -observatory V36
18:34:14.92 -33:28:19.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:05:38.30 -67:59:41.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:35.32 +32:08:08.5 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:09:53.94 +15:49:48.4 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:13:43.25 -35:56:58.9 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:04.72 +31:59:52.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:48:55.90 +27:00:44.4 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:38:57.19 +30:37:31.8 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:25.35 +04:26:48.1 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:20:07.21 +21:42:10.1 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:27.16 -11:04:21.7 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:08:14.50 +67:11:01.2 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:15:58.77 -07:56:44.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:38.91 +80:07:14.1 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:28:14.19 +64:45:57.5 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:05:22.27 +28:48:35.0 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:28:12.33 +14:26:43.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:03:22.01 +34:38:25.2 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:30:14.94 -14:58:23.7 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:17:11.15 +32:23:56.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.41 +52:00:02.4 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:58:03.46 -11:28:36.2 15.2mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:35:01.23 +23:06:27.9 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:13.36 +04:33:12.8 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:48:10.75 +77:23:34.2 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:20:30.68 +44:12:53.8 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:15:03.63 +00:05:10.0 16.7mag A/2026 E1
20:45:30.82 -09:58:13.8 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:28.13 -01:12:36.5 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:30:31.08 +27:13:34.1 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:26:02.50 +20:11:08.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:36:37.57 -05:41:17.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:23:11.74 +34:17:50.7 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:38:52.83 +18:37:24.2 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:46:12.14 +07:20:10.9 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:33:51.13 +30:54:01.0 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:18:37.32 +29:23:01.4 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:20:00.79 +32:25:47.5 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:11:45.60 +09:26:37.5 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:19:12.82 +19:59:11.0 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:57:45.94 +19:31:27.6 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:47:40.48 +16:55:48.9 16.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:51:16.07 +17:52:18.5 16.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:53:16.98 +17:17:32.1 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:05:56.12 -23:07:39.1 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:22:40.87 +28:21:05.6 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:29.30 +05:44:53.1 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:50:50.54 +04:43:13.0 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:40.55 -08:05:59.8 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:02:04.46 +34:51:01.7 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:04:46.26 +02:53:10.0 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:38:20.80 +34:30:42.9 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:55:41.19 +03:22:00.5 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:28.72 +07:31:59.2 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:17:11.32 +20:23:45.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:19:52.84 +40:47:55.6 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 20 06:51 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 20 06:51 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 20 06:51 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:46:06.891 +33:41:13.54 AT 2026oyn 2026-06-03.92 19.91
22:04:59.426 +17:15:40.14 AT 2026oym 2026-06-09.20 19.68
15:19:51.792 +48:33:17.32 AT 2026oyl 2026-06-09.90 20.47
21:06:36.637 +12:42:18.62 AT 2026oyk 2026-06-10.12 19.64
13:35:55.780 +35:23:15.20 AT 2026oyj 2026-05-24.78 21.27
18:33:47.510 +37:36:07.65 AT 2026oyi 2026-05-10.79 21.55
18:14:44.150 +51:46:11.54 AT 2026oyh 2026-05-08.79 22.03
15:07:33.090 +20:01:11.55 AT 2026oyg 2026-05-07.82 21.15
13:35:40.460 -01:57:01.30 AT 2026oyf 2026-05-22.68 22.32
10:26:08.380 +04:26:57.22 AT 2026oye 2026-05-22.61 21.23
14:00:27.900 -01:28:05.40 AT 2026oyd 2026-06-02.72 21
13:47:00.850 +01:08:03.86 AT 2026oyc 2026-06-02.72 20.42
14:34:07.980 +03:43:00.64 AT 2026oyb 2026-05-25.68 21.54
13:48:38.410 +04:03:32.72 AT 2026oya 2026-05-09.68 22.13
00:38:19.802 -05:15:31.84 AT 2026oxz 2026-06-08.47 19.6034
14:39:23.496 +35:21:27.84 AT 2026oxy 2026-06-04.97 20.13
23:44:57.556 +04:18:42.85 SN 2026oxx 2026-06-11.15 19.97
15:19:13.587 +27:52:58.57 SN 2026oxw 2026-06-11.02 19.96
09:53:09.311 +42:13:35.56 AT 2026oxv 2026-06-10.17 19.7446
20:30:02.168 +37:49:06.79 AT 2026oxu 2026-06-10.94 19.78
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 20 06:51 tns_transients_list.txt
