This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3741 2461211.8741 11.69 21:05:24.61 -09:41:54.7
39.73737 -34.11979 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.287 Nephthys -1 -1 1 11.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:05:24.61 -09:41:54.7: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:05:24.61 -09:41:54.7: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8741,11.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3741 11.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3741 2461211.8741 12.68 20:25:16.02 -13:01:05.6
31.41725 -26.60795 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.125 Liberatrix 0 -3 3 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:16.02 -13:01:05.6: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:16.02 -13:01:05.6: 14.86 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.23
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 20.3741* 20 25 16.02 -13 01 05.6 12.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8741,12.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3741 12.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8741,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3741 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 20.3741 2461211.8741 13.71 20:45:28.95 -11:08:41.2
35.68942 -30.32757 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -2 -3 3 14.1 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:45:28.95 -11:08:41.2: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:45:28.95 -11:08:41.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461211.8741,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260620.3741 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
First image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Last image: 2461211.87444221 20.06.2026 08:59:01.807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12399
Objects passed selection criteria: 12394
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10867.5
Average stars matched: 9021.75 (83.0159 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115732 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 06:02:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
First image: 2461129.97900007 30.03.2026 11:29:35.606 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Last image: 2461211.87444221 20.06.2026 08:59:01.807 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 94
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 40 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 67257
Objects passed selection criteria: 67160
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 62643.8
Average stars matched: 55507 (88.6074 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 166780 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 20 06:05:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.87378844
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits'
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:27.978 -09:57:54.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:27.978 -09:57:54.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0349 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:30.936 -09:58:32.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:30.936 -09:58:32.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0317 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:27.978 -09:57:54.94
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:30.936 -09:58:32.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01607 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MyDiSBsd3f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l3IklNd8KS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KFCRaXGM90
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xI0JJjrw2K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5060 out of 5163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5163 out of 6247 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.449100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.449100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.5092 to 316.6547 deg, Dec -15.2711 to -4.6672 deg
Loaded 9320 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5060 out of 5163 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5163 out of 6247 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 12515 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2071 to 316.7410 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2652 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2071 to 316.7410 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2652 deg
Loaded 10202 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7581 out of 7799 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7799 out of 12515 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (aperture=7.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
3.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
3.6 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.5 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.6 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.MyDiSBsd3f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, passed=6247
Got 6247 stars (including 5872 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6143 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=237 n_q2=192 n_q3=266 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.219
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l3IklNd8KS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=557, passed=12515
Got 12515 stars (including 11948 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12515 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12240 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=236 n_q2=183 n_q3=287 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KFCRaXGM90 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=537, passed=12497
Got 12497 stars (including 11955 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12497 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12253 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=226 n_q2=187 n_q3=280 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.464
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xI0JJjrw2K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=546, passed=12463
Got 12463 stars (including 11909 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12463 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12248 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12250 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=226 n_q2=188 n_q3=284 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.343
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits sigma_overall=0.410 worst_q_ratio=1.219
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.231
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits sigma_overall=0.344 worst_q_ratio=1.464
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.343
reference average sigma_overall=0.3775 worst_q_ratio=1.225
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417_astrometric_residuals.png (947 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:05:12.13 -10:18:30.9: 11.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:05:12.13 -10:18:30.9: 10.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:12.13 -10:18:30.9: ref_mag=10.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1831 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26422_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 26422_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Image size: 938.2'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:27.978 -09:57:54.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:27.978 -09:57:54.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0349 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:30.936 -09:58:32.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:25.630 -09:59:55.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:30.936 -09:58:32.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0317 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:27.978 -09:57:54.94
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:30.936 -09:58:32.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01607 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RZsDT8xf3o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MbLQYNImwV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bSHG1B2GcC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZHOxYuXnOS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 49699 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7693 out of 8323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8323 out of 49699 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.253400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.253400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.04
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.21
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 49699 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.4982 to 316.6567 deg, Dec -15.2729 to -4.6614 deg
Loaded 9336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7693 out of 8323 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8323 out of 49699 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 67486 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1864 to 316.7677 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2574 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1864 to 316.7677 deg, Dec -15.6099 to -4.2574 deg
Loaded 10232 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7501 out of 8355 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8355 out of 67486 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 74 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.3 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
3.3 pix wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
14.7 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RZsDT8xf3o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2235, passed=49686
Got 49686 stars (including 47382 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49686 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013031 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010424 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48849 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=245 n_q2=198 n_q3=241 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MbLQYNImwV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4245, passed=67476
Got 67476 stars (including 63154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66347 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=235 n_q2=184 n_q3=286 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.188
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bSHG1B2GcC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=4296, passed=67796
Got 67796 stars (including 63441 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67796 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66777 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66774 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=222 n_q2=192 n_q3=281 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.400
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZHOxYuXnOS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4327, passed=67587
Got 67587 stars (including 63171 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67587 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=214 n_q2=195 n_q3=282 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.358
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-58-05_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0420.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_055255_TTUQ1b1x1_872642_I4JnKtlz/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:18:17.23 -09:02:50.0: 13.61 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:26.52 -13:45:03.8: 13.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:05:24.61 -09:41:54.7: 14.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:10:41.37 -12:45:16.4: 13.21 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:20:50.78 -06:29:38.2: 13.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:25:16.02 -13:01:05.6: 14.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:30:29.52 -08:04:39.4: 13.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:16:02.94 -10:09:42.3: 13.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:11:58.91 -05:25:16.2: 13.28 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:20:27.83 -05:36:59.5: 13.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:16.02 -13:01:05.6: 14.86 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:18:17.23 -09:02:50.0: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:25:16.02 -13:01:05.6: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=12.6783 delta=2.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:17.23 -09:02:50.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7265 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:20:27.83 -05:36:59.5: 13.06 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:20:50.78 -06:29:38.2: 12.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:11:58.91 -05:25:16.2: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:27.83 -05:36:59.5: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7259 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:58.91 -05:25:16.2: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3570 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:50.78 -06:29:38.2: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2811 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:16:02.94 -10:09:42.3: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:02.94 -10:09:42.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2784 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:05:24.61 -09:41:54.7: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:10:41.37 -12:45:16.4: 13.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:41.37 -12:45:16.4: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4861 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:30:29.52 -08:04:39.4: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:29.52 -08:04:39.4: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4981 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:25:26.52 -13:45:03.8: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:26.52 -13:45:03.8: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2244 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:05:35.39 -06:13:08.6: 13.48 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:00:34.59 -11:01:19.8: 13.52 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:02:38.07 -14:58:26.4: 13.56 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:04:26.99 -14:53:27.9: 13.67 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:23:43.18 -11:12:37.7: 13.64 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:51:08.96 -14:35:08.6: 13.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:00:02.33 -14:28:01.7: 14.20 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:05:35.39 -06:13:08.6: 12.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:35.39 -06:13:08.6: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2984 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:00:34.59 -11:01:19.8: 13.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:02:38.07 -14:58:26.4: 13.22 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:34.59 -11:01:19.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2770 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:38.07 -14:58:26.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0728 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:04:26.99 -14:53:27.9: 13.76 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:26.99 -14:53:27.9: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2685 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:00:02.33 -14:28:01.7: 13.60 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:51:08.96 -14:35:08.6: 13.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:02.33 -14:28:01.7: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4442 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:23:43.18 -11:12:37.7: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:08.96 -14:35:08.6: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.3759 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:43.18 -11:12:37.7: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4389 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:12:04.10 -10:44:03.3: 13.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:55:10.09 -14:21:47.8: 13.92 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:10:51.34 -09:10:27.3: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:30:20.65 -04:47:01.3: 13.19 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:39:49.69 -06:07:42.3: 13.57 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:50:22.30 -08:31:08.5: 13.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:00:48.92 -13:03:38.5: 14.01 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:12:04.10 -10:44:03.3: 13.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:12:04.10 -10:44:03.3: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.4058 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:55:10.09 -14:21:47.8: 13.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:10:51.34 -09:10:27.3: 13.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:10.09 -14:21:47.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4432 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:10:51.34 -09:10:27.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.5827 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:30:20.65 -04:47:01.3: 13.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:20.65 -04:47:01.3: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5841 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:39:49.69 -06:07:42.3: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:49.69 -06:07:42.3: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7024 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:50:22.30 -08:31:08.5: 13.45 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:00:48.92 -13:03:38.5: 13.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:50:22.30 -08:31:08.5: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4533 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:48.92 -13:03:38.5: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5277 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:58:32.20 -14:58:46.2: 14.38 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:05:02.31 -14:56:32.8: 14.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:54:30.54 -08:08:25.8: 13.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:01:11.60 -13:30:22.0: 14.07 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:05:02.31 -14:56:32.8: 14.07 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:58:32.20 -14:58:46.2: 14.15 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:17:34.50 -05:04:56.9: 13.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:03:08.17 -13:35:09.3: 13.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:02.31 -14:56:32.8: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.5960 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:32.20 -14:58:46.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.5652 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:06:06.49 -11:16:06.5: 14.37 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:54:30.54 -08:08:25.8: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:30.54 -08:08:25.8: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7013 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:01:11.60 -13:30:22.0: 13.83 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:11.60 -13:30:22.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.5045 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:17:34.50 -05:04:56.9: 13.43 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:03:08.17 -13:35:09.3: 13.95 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:34.50 -05:04:56.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6495 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:06:06.49 -11:16:06.5: 13.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:08.17 -13:35:09.3: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4142 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:06.49 -11:16:06.5: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.5876 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:11:33.94 -07:45:05.5: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:24:19.91 -11:35:06.6: 13.15 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:03:31.50 -11:52:39.1: 14.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:45:28.95 -11:08:41.2: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:11:33.94 -07:45:05.5: 13.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:02:04.40 -11:42:58.4: 14.26 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:24:19.91 -11:35:06.6: 13.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:56:49.53 -08:35:13.1: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:03:31.50 -11:52:39.1: 13.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:02.55 -14:14:16.8: 14.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:33.94 -07:45:05.5: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6813 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:31.50 -11:52:39.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5373 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:19.91 -11:35:06.6: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5535 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:45:28.95 -11:08:41.2: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:56:49.53 -08:35:13.1: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:02:04.40 -11:42:58.4: 13.78 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:02.55 -14:14:16.8: 13.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:49.53 -08:35:13.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6189 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:04.40 -11:42:58.4: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6822 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:02.55 -14:14:16.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6461 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:04:28.09 -12:55:08.4: 13.93 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:48.65 -09:59:47.5: 14.04 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:01:20.84 -09:42:14.0: 13.94 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:04:28.09 -12:55:08.4: 13.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:28.09 -12:55:08.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5834 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:56:40.08 -12:40:49.3: 14.39 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:56:03.76 -13:02:09.3: 13.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:05:00.47 -14:22:33.1: 14.37 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:59:05.96 -15:08:42.7: 13.94 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:48.65 -09:59:47.5: 13.85 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:48.65 -09:59:47.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7145 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:01:20.84 -09:42:14.0: 14.27 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:20.84 -09:42:14.0: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7284 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:56:40.08 -12:40:49.3: 14.31 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:40.08 -12:40:49.3: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7499 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:56:03.76 -13:02:09.3: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:05:00.47 -14:22:33.1: 13.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:05:00.47 -14:22:33.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7293 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:03.76 -13:02:09.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7473 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:59:05.96 -15:08:42.7: 13.73 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:05.96 -15:08:42.7: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.4194 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:01:56.05 -13:12:25.3: 13.95 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:57:28.52 -13:37:26.7: 14.49 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:02:34.47 -13:50:56.9: 14.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:01:56.05 -13:12:25.3: 14.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:56.05 -13:12:25.3: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6982 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:00:12.89 -14:35:12.7: 14.45 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:06.44 -14:09:00.6: 13.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:01:11.37 -13:54:45.4: 14.09 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:59:08.18 -13:29:24.2: 14.27 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:57:28.52 -13:37:26.7: 14.04 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:28.52 -13:37:26.7: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6395 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:02:34.47 -13:50:56.9: 14.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:34.47 -13:50:56.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8089 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:00:12.89 -14:35:12.7: 13.98 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:00:12.89 -14:35:12.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7282 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:01:11.37 -13:54:45.4: 13.91 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:11.37 -13:54:45.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.6959 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:06.44 -14:09:00.6: 13.99 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:06.44 -14:09:00.6: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6941 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:59:08.18 -13:29:24.2: 13.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:08.18 -13:29:24.2: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7941 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 21:01:54.46 -13:22:33.0: 14.15 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:22:35.18 -11:16:56.0: 13.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 21:01:54.46 -13:22:33.0: 14.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:04:55.36 -10:58:47.4: 13.89 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:54.46 -13:22:33.0: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7782 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:47:44.66 -14:03:02.9: 13.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:59:11.48 -12:54:07.9: 14.16 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:55:09.98 -13:18:27.4: 13.77 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:05:15.69 -12:54:07.4: 13.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:22:35.18 -11:16:56.0: 13.80 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:35.18 -11:16:56.0: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7139 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:04:55.36 -10:58:47.4: 14.14 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:04:55.36 -10:58:47.4: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7703 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:47:44.66 -14:03:02.9: 14.00 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:44.66 -14:03:02.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6881 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:59:11.48 -12:54:07.9: 14.18 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:59:11.48 -12:54:07.9: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.7580 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:55:09.98 -13:18:27.4: 13.83 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:05:15.69 -12:54:07.4: 13.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:09.98 -13:18:27.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8496 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:15.69 -12:54:07.4: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7878 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:51:54.48 -13:59:21.8: 13.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:58:38.13 -13:47:29.5: 13.99 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:56:02.32 -14:56:26.5: 13.88 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:51:54.48 -13:59:21.8: 14.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:54.48 -13:59:21.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6456 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:48:00.25 -14:03:09.9: 13.99 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:49:54.17 -14:50:50.4: 13.73 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:58:38.13 -13:47:29.5: 14.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:57:11.47 -14:50:13.6: 14.02 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:38.13 -13:47:29.5: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.8342 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:48:30.05 -14:40:56.6: 13.88 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:53:12.30 -14:48:03.8: 14.16 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:56:02.32 -14:56:26.5: 13.88 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:02.32 -14:56:26.5: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7847 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:48:00.25 -14:03:09.9: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:00.25 -14:03:09.9: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.8251 delta=-2.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:49:54.17 -14:50:50.4: 13.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:54.17 -14:50:50.4: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7413 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-03-30_06-29-35_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0417.fits at 20:56:52.00 -15:01:01.1: 14.23 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:48:30.05 -14:40:56.6: 14.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:53:12.30 -14:48:03.8: 14.23 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:30.05 -14:40:56.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7836 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:57:11.47 -14:50:13.6: 13.97 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:12.30 -14:48:03.8: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8071 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:57:11.47 -14:50:13.6: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7955 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-16_04-45-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0344.fits at 20:56:52.00 -15:01:01.1: 14.13 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:52.00 -15:01:01.1: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7525 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70242.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70453.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70173_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70173_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70175_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70175_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70177_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70177_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70185_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70185_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70189_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70189_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70194_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70194_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70196_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70196_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70199_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70199_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70242_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 70242_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70297_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 70297_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70298_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 70298_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70324_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70324_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:23:53.18 -12:49:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70341_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70341_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:27.98 -06:01:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70344_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70344_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70366_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70366_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.72 -06:23:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70369_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70369_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70371_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70371_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70382_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70382_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70389_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70389_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70395_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70395_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70397_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70397_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70398_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70398_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70402_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70402_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70403_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70403_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70406_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70406_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70411_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70411_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70416_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70416_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70418_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70418_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70422_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70422_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70429_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70429_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70431_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70431_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70439_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70439_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70440_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70440_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70441_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70441_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70443_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70443_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70450_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70450_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70451_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70451_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70453_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
Preparing report for the candidate 70453_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70459_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70459_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70465_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70465_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70474_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70474_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70475_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70475_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70476_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70476_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70483_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70483_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70486_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70486_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70494_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70494_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70497_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70497_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70507_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70507_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70508_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70508_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70509_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70509_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70510_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70510_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70511_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70511_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70516_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70516_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70519_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70519_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70520_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70520_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70522_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70522_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70526_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70526_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70547_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70547_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70552_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70552_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70564_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70564_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70565_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70565_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70569_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70569_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70580_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70580_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70581_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70581_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70588_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70588_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70589_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70589_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70590_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70590_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70591_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70591_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70596_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70596_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70607_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70607_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70615_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70615_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70626_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70626_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:03.24 -12:56:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70660_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421
The candidate 70660_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_03-59-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0421 did not pass the final checks