######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Dra-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 418734 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 418734 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits

renamed 'Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits_preview.png'
Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 385.2809
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.2397
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1058.1870
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 433.5620
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1041.5797
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 443.8773
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.74653
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.023
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T01:46:58.2543545' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T06:46:58.2543545' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61211.2826186805 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T06:47:08.1543806' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61211.2827332639 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 232.937105275655 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9996105714656 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 58.0955555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 319.970833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.17743910214687 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 76.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 340.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 18.701496 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits :)
Spent 0.668114 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T01:47:35.8086298' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T06:47:35.8086298' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61211.2830533334 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T06:47:45.7106375' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61211.2831679396 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 232.937105305334 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 53.9996105422439 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 58.0105555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 319.897222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.17852616038341 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Dra-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29451 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 76.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 340.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 18.701496 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits :)
Spent 0.636454 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits

fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.78273442
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:32:09.476 +54:03:15.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:32:09.476 +54:03:15.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0754 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:32:09.762 +54:03:00.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:32:09.762 +54:03:00.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0731 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:32:09.476 +54:03:15.17
Second-epoch second image center 15:32:09.762 +54:03:00.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00410 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z9s40aeDz5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PxbpGoAU2C
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NRPu18BwFJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits &> /tmp/tmp.idMd6NaKkP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4420 out of 4572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4572 out of 8363 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.759200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.759200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8637 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4420 out of 4572 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4572 out of 8363 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 8357 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1988 to 247.8636 deg, Dec +48.2439 to +59.2440 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1988 to 247.8636 deg, Dec 48.2439 to 59.2440 deg
Loaded 6135 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4426 out of 4576 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4576 out of 8357 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
4.2 pix fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
4.2 pix fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
15.4 mag. Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z9s40aeDz5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=8363
Got 8363 stars (including 7897 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8363 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=264 n_q2=216 n_q3=251 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PxbpGoAU2C (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=460, passed=8357
Got 8357 stars (including 7883 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.462 n_q1=264 n_q2=213 n_q3=249 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.285
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NRPu18BwFJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=182, passed=5989
Got 5989 stars (including 5806 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5989 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=271 n_q2=218 n_q3=242 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.idMd6NaKkP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=199, passed=6335
Got 6335 stars (including 6132 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6218 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6217 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=266 n_q2=218 n_q3=245 n_q4=212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits sigma_overall=0.390 worst_q_ratio=1.160
ref2=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits sigma_overall=0.396 worst_q_ratio=1.285
new1=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.108
new2=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits sigma_overall=0.312 worst_q_ratio=1.172
reference average sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.2225
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20526_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 20526_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.72 | 16:16:16.95 +51:36:39.8 | 0584 4080 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 16:16:16.91 +51:36:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20543_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 20543_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.85 | 15:53:25.81 +53:09:24.3 | 2842 3535 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:53:25.84 +53:09:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:32:09.476 +54:03:15.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:32:09.476 +54:03:15.17
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0754 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Image size: 940.8'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:32:09.762 +54:03:00.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:47.843 +54:00:02.05
Second-epoch image center 15:32:09.762 +54:03:00.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0731 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:32:09.476 +54:03:15.17
Second-epoch second image center 15:32:09.762 +54:03:00.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00410 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K3QNBtagwQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QE9iex0Su5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YIgbD5zz6f
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ndLkGppktA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43365 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec +48.1644 to +59.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec 48.1644 to 59.2687 deg
Loaded 6233 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4200 out of 4603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4603 out of 43365 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.653050
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.653050
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43365 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec +48.1644 to +59.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1484 to 248.0262 deg, Dec 48.1644 to 59.2687 deg
Loaded 6233 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4200 out of 4603 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4603 out of 43365 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 43531 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.1483 to 248.0272 deg, Dec +48.1643 to +59.2726 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.1483 to 248.0272 deg, Dec 48.1643 to 59.2726 deg
Loaded 6237 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4222 out of 4601 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4601 out of 43531 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
3.7 pix fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
3.7 pix fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
15.5 mag. Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.K3QNBtagwQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=1952, passed=43330
Got 43330 stars (including 41314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43330 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.494 n_q1=265 n_q2=213 n_q3=242 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QE9iex0Su5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1994, passed=43510
Got 43510 stars (including 41447 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43510 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43126 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=262 n_q2=216 n_q3=240 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YIgbD5zz6f (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=825, passed=24698
Got 24698 stars (including 23860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.239 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=274 n_q2=206 n_q3=241 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.178
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ndLkGppktA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=889, passed=26077
Got 26077 stars (including 25167 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26077 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013067 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010453 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.294 n_q1=266 n_q2=208 n_q3=248 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 15:51:56.42 +58:47:24.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:10:12.46 +57:40:00.1: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:18:52.82 +58:04:52.4: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 14:47:12.53 +50:58:14.5: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 15:51:56.42 +58:47:24.1: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:18:52.82 +58:04:52.4: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:10:12.46 +57:40:00.1: 14.16 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 14:47:12.53 +50:58:14.5: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:56.42 +58:47:24.1: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4128 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.07 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:12.46 +57:40:00.1: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9838 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:52.82 +58:04:52.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6115 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:47:12.53 +50:58:14.5: ref_mag=14.07 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9497 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:04:30.20 +51:27:54.3: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:08:56.74 +50:44:16.7: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 14:39:31.61 +58:24:41.0: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 16:03:47.77 +52:38:57.2: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_02-59-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits at 14:36:28.96 +57:51:23.6: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:04:30.20 +51:27:54.3: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:30.20 +51:27:54.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5492 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:08:56.74 +50:44:16.7: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:56.74 +50:44:16.7: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8938 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 16:03:47.77 +52:38:57.2: 14.19 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 14:39:31.61 +58:24:41.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:47.77 +52:38:57.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6961 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:31.61 +58:24:41.0: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0240 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_03-00-01_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0314.fits at 14:36:28.96 +57:51:23.6: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:36:28.96 +57:51:23.6: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3904 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53284_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53284_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 14.21 | 16:10:12.70 +57:39:57.5 | 1879 0601 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.88 | 16:10:12.21 +57:40:02.8 | 1881 0598 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53285_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53285_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.77 | 16:25:29.67 +56:31:22.3 | 0483 0980 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53286_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53286_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 13.94 | 14:47:12.32 +50:58:17.9 | 8959 5007 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.96 | 14:47:12.75 +50:58:11.2 | 8959 5006 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53293_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53293_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 13.79 | 16:18:52.80 +58:04:51.1 | 1244 0196 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.51 | 16:18:52.84 +58:04:53.7 | 1244 0194 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53295_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53295_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 13.55 | 15:51:56.53 +58:47:23.9 | 3434 0181 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.33 | 15:51:56.30 +58:47:24.2 | 3435 0179 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53387_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53387_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.36 | 15:22:03.37 +56:35:21.6 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53394_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53394_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.48 | 15:39:35.00 +57:10:31.8 | 4308 1267 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53419_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53419_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.79 | 15:28:35.05 +51:12:35.9 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53420_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53420_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.74 | 15:39:30.33 +56:13:31.6 | 4262 1839 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53430_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53430_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.81 | 16:16:16.93 +51:36:40.0 | 0584 4080 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 16:16:16.89 +51:36:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53433_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53433_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.85 | 14:52:24.39 +56:51:58.1 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53445_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53445_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.03 | 16:07:31.24 +57:03:37.5 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53461_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53461_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.07 | 14:56:06.92 +53:02:52.4 | 8022 3807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53488_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53488_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.27 | 15:43:50.18 +49:15:08.7 | 3451 5989 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53508_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53508_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.34 | 14:44:55.13 +51:55:01.6 | 9120 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53536_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53536_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.55 | 14:41:07.87 +57:56:08.7 | 9055 0731 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 14:41:07.84 +57:56:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53543_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53543_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.59 | 15:31:28.41 +56:52:06.5 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53566_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53566_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.71 | 15:25:19.14 +58:59:23.4 | 5517 0246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:25:19.29 +58:59:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53570_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53570_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.70 | 16:01:59.33 +58:31:49.7 | 2627 0209 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 16:01:59.36 +58:31:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53585_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53585_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.69 | 16:15:33.95 +49:01:42.6 | 0303 5635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53614_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53614_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.86 | 15:38:19.42 +50:20:20.1 | 4051 5384 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:38:19.45 +50:20:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53626_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53626_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.96 | 15:20:05.12 +51:59:23.5 | 5827 4484 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:20:05.04 +51:59:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53643_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53643_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.05 | 15:14:46.00 +50:28:58.4 | 6318 5403 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53698_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53698_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.16 | 15:33:06.78 +48:58:39.7 | 4494 6247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53738_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53738_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.31 | 15:55:10.78 +48:39:30.6 | 2283 6211 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53776_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53776_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.72 | 15:42:32.89 +54:32:45.9 | 3905 2821 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:42:33.04 +54:32:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53783_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53783_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.30 | 14:41:39.51 +53:13:11.7 | 9337 3591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53788_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53788_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.42 | 15:32:07.01 +54:45:35.4 | 4821 2769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53794_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53794_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 13.55 | 16:04:30.15 +51:27:54.5 | 1664 4386 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.55 | 16:04:30.26 +51:27:54.2 | 1664 4383 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53827_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53827_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.65 | 16:04:44.18 +51:22:19.7 | 1633 4435 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 16:04:44.14 +51:22:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53834_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53834_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.76 | 15:52:25.04 +55:48:32.3 | 3152 1963 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:52:25.03 +55:48:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53835_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53835_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.69 | 15:27:39.70 +57:12:56.8 | 5281 1312 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53855_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53855_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.67 | 15:01:33.51 +49:12:40.9 | 7628 6160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:01:33.50 +49:12:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53873_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53873_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 14.01 | 15:32:09.95 +57:20:41.7 | 4919 1213 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53874_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53874_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.88 | 15:46:45.62 +57:15:28.8 | 3730 1155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53892_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53892_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.66 | 16:16:07.99 +55:05:00.9 | 1063 2025 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53906_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53906_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 13.89 | 16:08:56.57 +50:44:16.3 | 1162 4743 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.90 | 16:08:56.90 +50:44:17.1 | 1163 4740 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53936_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 53936_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 14.04 | 15:23:43.30 +56:00:06.4 | 5576 2058 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54020_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 54020_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 14.67 | 15:41:07.05 +50:32:53.9 | 3795 5233 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50040_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 50040_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 13.69 | 16:03:47.65 +52:38:57.1 | 1858 3691 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.70 | 16:03:47.89 +52:38:57.4 | 1858 3689 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50074_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 50074_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 12.01 | 14:39:31.65 +58:24:40.4 | 9151 0428 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 12.04 | 14:39:31.57 +58:24:41.6 | 9151 0426 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50053_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 50053_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.28273 | 2461211.78273 | 13.35 | 14:36:28.94 +57:51:22.6 | 9440 0731 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-46-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits |
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.44 | 14:36:28.98 +57:51:24.5 | 9440 0729 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25328_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 25328_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 11.88 | 15:53:25.89 +53:09:24.4 | 2842 3535 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:53:25.88 +53:09:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04071_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 04071_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 10.44 | 14:40:36.86 +57:38:40.0 | 9118 0903 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41236_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269
The candidate 41236_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.28317 | 2461211.78317 | 13.04 | 15:04:27.29 +51:52:04.5 | 7284 4554 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_015647_TTUQ1b1x1_3077628_C1Il3huk/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_01-47-35_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0269.fits |
**** FOUND 15:04:27.32 +51:52:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Dra-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.78273442 -observatory V36
07:37:27.99 +21:42:27.6 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:42:01.13 +20:18:29.9 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:24:55.42 +18:14:07.9 Mars (1.3mag)
07:58:45.41 +21:04:19.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:27.76 +03:05:00.4 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:03:01.04 +20:33:26.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:42.78 +00:19:49.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:34.88 -23:09:20.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:37:29.24 +07:08:04.5 Moon (-9.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 20 01:59 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.78273442:
07:58:40.81 +21:04:35.2 Io (6.2mag)
07:58:53.52 +21:03:51.7 Europa (6.3mag)
07:58:54.99 +21:03:44.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:59:07.34 +21:03:13.6 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:58:20.01 +20:42:15.3 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:58:49.57 +21:04:05.5 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:57:59.86 +20:52:43.9 Elara (17.6mag)
08:01:31.28 +21:09:24.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:04:46.90 +21:07:02.8 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:22.61 +03:05:29.5 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:32.77 +03:05:01.9 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:41.91 +03:07:23.7 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:31.71 +03:05:28.2 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:54.86 +03:05:11.3 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 20 01:59 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.78273442:
17:28:57.51 -35:32:50.3 JWST
18:28:59.45 +26:06:31.6 Chandra
20:18:05.93 +28:28:47.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 20 01:59 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.78273442 -observatory V36
18:34:21.94 -33:27:49.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:05:29.77 -67:59:41.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:32.17 +32:08:01.1 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:09:57.23 +15:49:34.4 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:12:20.89 -36:12:04.2 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:07.81 +31:59:37.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:48:45.66 +27:00:44.1 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:38:50.48 +30:37:52.1 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:20.35 +04:26:29.8 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:20:12.90 +21:42:11.6 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:29.54 -11:04:17.2 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:08:20.42 +67:10:38.1 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:16:19.67 -07:55:51.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:36.16 +80:09:17.2 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:28:01.17 +64:45:36.7 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:05:09.99 +28:47:59.2 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:28:18.22 +14:26:11.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:03:29.91 +34:36:07.1 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:30:06.51 -14:59:00.0 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:17:03.40 +32:25:21.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.36 +52:00:35.9 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:57:55.26 -11:28:07.9 15.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:34:53.08 +23:06:40.8 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:12.41 +04:33:22.5 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:48:31.95 +77:22:19.1 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:20:17.98 +44:12:22.3 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:15:00.17 +00:02:51.3 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:45:16.73 -09:56:50.8 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:25.30 -01:12:23.7 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:30:18.18 +27:12:30.6 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:25:44.43 +20:13:41.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:36:31.51 -05:41:41.1 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:22:44.17 +34:17:29.7 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:38:32.21 +18:36:32.2 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:45:55.40 +07:18:35.1 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:33:24.17 +30:53:49.1 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:18:11.92 +29:21:57.0 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:19:40.16 +32:26:19.6 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:11:30.36 +09:30:10.7 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:18:58.87 +19:58:43.6 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:57:29.27 +19:31:14.1 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:47:08.42 +16:57:11.9 16.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:50:43.13 +17:52:27.1 16.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:52:37.82 +17:17:07.8 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:05:50.67 -23:08:38.0 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:22:11.75 +28:18:12.9 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:35.30 +05:41:47.1 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:50:28.54 +04:41:46.1 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:45.86 -08:06:06.5 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:01:45.62 +34:51:33.7 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:04:23.69 +02:49:22.3 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:37:56.56 +34:29:26.7 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:55:06.02 +03:14:43.2 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:31.49 +07:32:28.7 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:17:04.12 +20:24:01.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:19:39.06 +40:48:33.9 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 20 01:59 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 20 01:59 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 20 01:59 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
18:33:47.510 +37:36:07.65 AT 2026oyi 2026-05-10.79 21.55
18:14:44.150 +51:46:11.54 AT 2026oyh 2026-05-08.79 22.03
15:07:33.090 +20:01:11.55 AT 2026oyg 2026-05-07.82 21.15
13:35:40.460 -01:57:01.30 AT 2026oyf 2026-05-22.68 22.32
10:26:08.380 +04:26:57.22 AT 2026oye 2026-05-22.61 21.23
14:00:27.900 -01:28:05.40 AT 2026oyd 2026-06-02.72 21
13:47:00.850 +01:08:03.86 AT 2026oyc 2026-06-02.72 20.42
14:34:07.980 +03:43:00.64 AT 2026oyb 2026-05-25.68 21.54
13:48:38.410 +04:03:32.72 AT 2026oya 2026-05-09.68 22.13
00:38:19.802 -05:15:31.84 AT 2026oxz 2026-06-08.47 19.6034
14:39:23.496 +35:21:27.84 AT 2026oxy 2026-06-04.97 20.13
23:44:57.556 +04:18:42.85 SN 2026oxx 2026-06-11.15 19.97
15:19:13.587 +27:52:58.57 SN 2026oxw 2026-06-11.02 19.96
09:53:09.311 +42:13:35.56 AT 2026oxv 2026-06-10.17 19.7446
20:30:02.168 +37:49:06.79 AT 2026oxu 2026-06-10.94 19.78
16:00:10.377 +22:09:10.94 AT 2026oxt 2026-06-11.03 19.379
17:32:05.150 +18:24:04.24 AT 2026oxs 2026-06-11.07 20.323
16:01:14.849 +29:49:20.54 AT 2026oxr 2026-06-08.41 18.733
18:33:36.042 +54:00:37.60 AT 2026oxq 2026-06-10.04 19.165
16:26:58.974 +50:28:07.45 AT 2026oxp 2026-06-10.01 20.192
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 20 01:59 tns_transients_list.txt