## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461172.82001713 12.05.2026 07:40:39.480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
First image: 2461172.82001713 12.05.2026 07:40:39.480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Last  image: 2461211.75676683 20.06.2026 06:09:34.654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4876
Objects passed selection criteria:  4867
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.3    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.3    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3112.25
Average stars matched: 3038 (97.6143 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   111748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Jun 20 01:25:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461172.82001713 12.05.2026 07:40:39.480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
First image: 2461172.82001713 12.05.2026 07:40:39.480   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Last  image: 2461211.75676683 20.06.2026 06:09:34.654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.14
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  29835
Objects passed selection criteria:  29756
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.4    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.4    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 20189.8
Average stars matched: 19723.2 (97.6894 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   137152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Jun 20 01:27:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Boo-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-10-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 432750 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 432750 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits_preview.png'

Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits


renamed 'Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits_preview.png'

Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 489.6180
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 516.3518
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1839.7493
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 312.2106
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1971.2384
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 358.9256
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.75752
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.130
ERROR: passing clouds (SD ratio=0.130 soft threshold=0.12)
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =                22.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T01:08:49.0113599' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T06:08:49.0113599' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61211.2561228126 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T06:08:58.9131784' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61211.2562374189 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     226.664408514764 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =      13.999893357025 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     55.0108333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     243.203888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.21997017538365 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Boo-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 06 40'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20432 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20432 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =                22.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=                22.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                331.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            18.701496 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/d_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits :)

Spent 0.658380 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/d_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =                22.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T01:09:34.6544693' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T06:09:34.6544693' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61211.2566510881 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T06:09:44.5566533' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61211.2567656944 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  4.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     226.664408533916 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9998933363567 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     54.8680555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     243.413055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.22209987862852 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Boo-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 06 40'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20432 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20432 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =                22.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=                22.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 72.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.31 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                331.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            23.801904 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            18.701496 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 4.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/d_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits :)

Spent 0.610162 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/d_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits



fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.75623855
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Image size: 937.0'x623.9'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:40.167 +13:59:40.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:40.167 +13:59:40.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0377 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 923.9'x617.6'  15.4(deg)x10.3(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.80"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:43.310 +13:59:40.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:43.310 +13:59:40.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0496 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  15:06:40.167 +13:59:40.74
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:43.310 +13:59:40.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01271 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xFGzdvCfaO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits &> /tmp/tmp.24lkS45Gtc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y6CKyy21lW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nLmluJ7RMr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.2135 to +19.5779 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.2135 to 19.5779 deg
Loaded 4766 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3531 out of 3718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3718 out of 7234 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.828000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.828000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.35

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.35

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.2135 to +19.5779 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3797 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.2135 to 19.5779 deg
Loaded 4766 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3531 out of 3718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3718 out of 7234 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 6628 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec +8.6792 to +19.2477 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec 8.6792 to 19.2477 deg
Loaded 4308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3555 out of 3660 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3660 out of 6628 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 2.2 pix  Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 15.2 mag.  Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
 12.3 mag.  fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
 12.2 mag.  fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  12.2 (SNR )   9.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xFGzdvCfaO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=532, passed=7234
Got 7234 stars (including 6692 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7234 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7089 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=243 n_q2=205 n_q3=263 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.24lkS45Gtc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, passed=6628
Got 6628 stars (including 6229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6628 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6473 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=234 n_q2=228 n_q3=235 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.261
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y6CKyy21lW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=55, passed=1015
Got 1015 stars (including 959 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1015 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 989 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 915 stars left (next iteration limit 1006)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits N_match=915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.528 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=271 n_q2=153 n_q3=275 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.310
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nLmluJ7RMr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=51, passed=741
Got 741 stars (including 689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 741 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 923.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 923.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012832 (46.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010266 (37.0 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 494 to 547 (Dec 8.8 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 346 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.22" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 333 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.61" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 494 to 547 (Dec 8.8 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 378 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 372 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.84" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 372 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.99" 
Excluding outliers - 372 stars left (next iteration limit 369)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=372 sigma_overall_arcsec=7.174 sigma_q1_arcsec=5.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=3.223 sigma_q3_arcsec=13.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=6.930 n_q1=191 n_q2=46 n_q3=50 n_q4=85 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.864
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.081
ref2=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits sigma_overall=0.423 worst_q_ratio=1.261
new1=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits sigma_overall=0.403 worst_q_ratio=1.310
new2=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits sigma_overall=7.174 worst_q_ratio=1.864
reference average sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.171
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits) flagged: sigma=7.174 (ref avg 0.398), ratio=1.864 (ref avg 1.171), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 719 high-SNR stars for plate solving
 
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/ 

######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388    SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2030492.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2030492.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
  log-odds ratio 34.7525 (1.23823e+15), 9 match, 0 conflict, 23 distractors, 55 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: -----+-++----+---+-------++--+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------+-------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 6)

Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2030492.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2030492.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.653823, 14.006165) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:36.918, +14:00:22.195).
Field size: 15.5174 x 10.413 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 178.485 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

Inserting WCS header...  '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 20 01:26 fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 20 01:26 out2030492.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01'        / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2030492.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2030492.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.5183 degrees of RA,Dec (226.653,14.0053)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
  log-odds ratio 34.7525 (1.23823e+15), 9 match, 0 conflict, 23 distractors, 55 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: -----+-++----+---+-------++--+-+(best)------------------------------------------------------------+-------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (5 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 6)

Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2030492.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2030492.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.653823, 14.006165) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:36.918, +14:00:22.195).
Field size: 15.5174 x 10.413 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 178.485 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg

WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 20 01:26 fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 20 01:26 out2030492.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)...  Opening FITS image file fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits for reading...  done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits)...  done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local   '           / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local   '           / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02'        / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 4669 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.0216, 944.732] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 30.4072 (1.60583e+13), 4 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 11 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ----++------------+--+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

 --> log-odds 30.4072
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 34.5716 (1.03334e+15), 8 match, 0 conflict, 48 distractors, 22 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ----++------------+--+----+-----------+-----+----------+(best)--------------------------------------------
 --> log-odds 34.5716
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 22.6168 (6.64296e+09), 6 match, 0 conflict, 24 distractors, 55 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ----++------------+--+----+--+(best)--------+-----+----------+--------------------------------------------
 --> log-odds 22.6168
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 27.1199 (5.99824e+11), 11 match, 0 conflict, 45 distractors, 98 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ----++------------+--+----+--+------+-+-----+------+---+(best)-----------+---------------+-------+--------
 --> log-odds 27.1199
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 201.363 (2.82338e+87), 54 match, 0 conflict, 138 distractors, 195 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.93737 arcsec/pix.
 --> log-odds 17.2202
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 13.7921
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 12.5145
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 11.1563
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.0216, 944.732] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 30.4072 (1.60583e+13), 4 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 11 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ----++------------+--+(best)------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 6)

 --> log-odds 30.4072
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 34.5716 (1.03334e+15), 8 match, 0 conflict, 48 distractors, 22 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ----++------------+--+----+-----------+-----+----------+(best)--------------------------------------------
 --> log-odds 34.5716
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 22.6168 (6.64296e+09), 6 match, 0 conflict, 24 distractors, 55 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ----++------------+--+----+--+(best)--------+-----+----------+--------------------------------------------
 --> log-odds 22.6168
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 27.1199 (5.99824e+11), 11 match, 0 conflict, 45 distractors, 98 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.91937 arcsec/pix.
  Hit/miss:   Hit/miss: ----++------------+--+----+--+------+-+-----+------+---+(best)-----------+---------------+-------+--------
 --> log-odds 27.1199
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
  log-odds ratio 201.363 (2.82338e+87), 54 match, 0 conflict, 138 distractors, 195 index.
  RA,Dec = (226.655,14.007), pixel scale 5.93737 arcsec/pix.
 --> log-odds 17.2202
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 13.7921
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 12.5145
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
 --> log-odds 11.1563
Got 10 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (226.651417, 14.004080) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (15:06:36.340, +14:00:14.689).
Field size: 15.5487 x 10.5059 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 178.462 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.new"...

renamed 'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 937.2'x623.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.85"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:36.137 +14:00:11.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 

 ### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
 ### Converted positions of 741 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2036267.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=51, passed=741
Got 741 stars (including 689 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 741 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 547 (Dec 8.8 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 152 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 135 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.69" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 134 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.84" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 547 (Dec 8.8 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 158 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 140 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 85 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 139 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 87 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.28" 
Excluding outliers - 139 stars left (next iteration limit 147)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=139 sigma_overall_arcsec=8.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=11.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=6.779 sigma_q3_arcsec=27.831 sigma_q4_arcsec=6.447 n_q1=18 n_q2=65 n_q3=11 n_q4=45 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits): sigma 7.174->8.495, ratio 1.864->3.276; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=8.495 -- 21.34x the reference average (0.398); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=3.276 -- 2.80x the reference average (1.171); plate solution may be of low accuracy

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208_astrometric_residuals.png (915 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (372 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 2.11 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Image size: 937.0'x623.9'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:40.167 +13:59:40.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:40.167 +13:59:40.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0377 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Image size: 923.9'x617.6'  15.4(deg)x10.3(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.79"/pix along the X axis and 5.80"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:06:43.310 +13:59:40.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:06:31.559 +14:00:32.46
Second-epoch image center 15:06:43.310 +13:59:40.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0496 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  15:06:40.167 +13:59:40.74
Second-epoch second image center 15:06:43.310 +13:59:40.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01271 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dJEwZrxsKL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JArbCPXdmG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PrSShgkhfU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SMLwW72Ogb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits and wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 44426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.1862 to +19.5920 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.1862 to 19.5920 deg
Loaded 4783 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3737 out of 44426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.695900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.695900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.14
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.56

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.56

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 44426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec +8.1862 to +19.5920 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.3704 to 235.2508 deg, Dec 8.1862 to 19.5920 deg
Loaded 4783 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3318 out of 3737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3737 out of 44426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 37570 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec +8.6742 to +19.2568 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 218.4353 to 234.9169 deg, Dec 8.6742 to 19.2568 deg
Loaded 4313 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3416 out of 3706 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3706 out of 37570 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 2.1 pix  Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
 2.0 pix  wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
 15.3 mag.  Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
 12.9 mag.  fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
 12.7 mag.  fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  12.7 (SNR )  12.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.dJEwZrxsKL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1964, passed=44400
Got 44400 stars (including 42355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 44400 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 490 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43357 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43356 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=245 n_q2=205 n_q3=260 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-12_02-40-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0268.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JArbCPXdmG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1496, passed=37562
Got 37562 stars (including 36016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.525 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.469 n_q1=233 n_q2=227 n_q3=236 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits -region wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-18_01-36-54_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1618.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PrSShgkhfU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=156, passed=7827
Got 7827 stars (including 7660 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7827 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7550 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7549 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=304 n_q2=141 n_q3=301 n_q4=201 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SMLwW72Ogb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=111, passed=6046
Got 6046 stars (including 5922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6046 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 923.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 923.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012832 (46.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010266 (37.0 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 498 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 485 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 439 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3177 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 4.07" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 545 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 532 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 3.77" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 531 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.47" 
Excluding outliers - 531 stars left (next iteration limit 532)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits N_match=531 sigma_overall_arcsec=6.105 sigma_q1_arcsec=4.678 sigma_q2_arcsec=3.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=8.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=6.589 n_q1=292 n_q2=65 n_q3=70 n_q4=104 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.384
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-08-49_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/wcs_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51789_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209
The candidate 51789_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.25677    2461211.75677    11.69    15:10:46.82 +10:06:06.8   4157 5562   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (197.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07169_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209
The candidate 07169_fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 20.25677    2461211.75677    10.75    14:54:22.37 +17:41:33.7   6572 0934   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_012326_TTUQ2b1x1_1893881_Ry86xobH/fd_Boo-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-20_01-09-34_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.6") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Boo-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.75623855 -observatory V36
07:37:23.48 +21:42:58.7 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:41:53.54 +20:18:59.7 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:24:50.71 +18:13:49.7 Mars (1.3mag)
07:58:44.02 +21:04:22.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:27.40 +03:04:58.5 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:03:00.68 +20:33:25.7 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:42.72 +00:19:49.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:35.00 -23:09:19.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:36:05.50 +07:18:44.2 Moon (-9.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 20 01:25 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.75623855:
07:58:39.15 +21:04:39.7 Io (6.2mag)
07:58:52.48 +21:03:54.4 Europa (6.3mag)
07:58:53.93 +21:03:46.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:59:05.73 +21:03:18.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:58:18.71 +20:42:18.8 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:58:47.62 +21:04:11.4 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:57:58.59 +20:52:48.1 Elara (17.6mag)
08:01:29.81 +21:09:28.9 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:04:45.58 +21:07:06.5 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:22.35 +03:05:27.8 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:32.47 +03:04:59.6 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:41.61 +03:07:22.0 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:31.46 +03:05:26.3 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:54.53 +03:05:09.7 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 20 01:25 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.75623855:
17:29:05.61 -35:32:52.9 JWST
18:28:06.58 +26:50:05.8 Chandra
19:49:07.78 +15:22:02.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 20 01:25 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.75623855 -observatory V36
18:34:23.27 -33:27:44.0 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:05:28.16 -67:59:41.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:31.57 +32:07:59.7 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:09:57.85 +15:49:31.7 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:12:05.10 -36:14:53.3 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:08.39 +31:59:35.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:48:43.73 +27:00:44.1 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:38:49.23 +30:37:55.9 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:19.41 +04:26:26.3 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:20:13.97 +21:42:11.9 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:29.99 -11:04:16.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:08:21.52 +67:10:33.7 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:16:23.62 -07:55:40.9 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:35.70 +80:09:40.4 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:27:58.72 +64:45:32.9 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:05:07.68 +28:47:52.5 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:28:19.34 +14:26:05.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:03:31.39 +34:35:41.0 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:30:04.92 -14:59:06.8 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:17:01.94 +32:25:37.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.38 +52:00:42.2 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:57:53.71 -11:28:02.6 15.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:34:51.56 +23:06:43.2 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:12.24 +04:33:24.4 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:48:35.95 +77:22:04.7 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:20:15.57 +44:12:16.4 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:14:59.53 +00:02:25.1 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:45:14.03 -09:56:35.0 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:24.77 -01:12:21.3 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:30:15.74 +27:12:18.6 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:25:41.03 +20:14:09.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:36:30.35 -05:41:45.5 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:22:38.97 +34:17:25.8 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:38:28.30 +18:36:22.4 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:45:52.22 +07:18:17.0 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:33:19.08 +30:53:46.9 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:18:07.11 +29:21:44.8 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:19:36.27 +32:26:25.7 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:11:27.51 +09:30:50.9 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:18:56.23 +19:58:38.5 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:57:26.13 +19:31:11.6 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:47:02.37 +16:57:27.7 16.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:50:36.91 +17:52:28.8 16.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:52:30.42 +17:17:03.2 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:05:49.63 -23:08:49.2 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:22:06.25 +28:17:40.4 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:36.41 +05:41:12.0 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:50:24.36 +04:41:29.7 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:46.88 -08:06:07.7 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:01:42.07 +34:51:39.8 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:04:19.41 +02:48:39.3 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:37:51.98 +34:29:12.4 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:54:59.24 +03:13:20.5 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:32.02 +07:32:34.2 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:17:02.77 +20:24:04.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:19:36.46 +40:48:41.2 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 20 01:25 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 20 01:25 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 20 01:25 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:34:07.980 +03:43:00.64  AT 2026oyb  2026-05-25.68 21.54
13:48:38.410 +04:03:32.72  AT 2026oya  2026-05-09.68 22.13
00:38:19.802 -05:15:31.84  AT 2026oxz  2026-06-08.47 19.6034
14:39:23.496 +35:21:27.84  AT 2026oxy  2026-06-04.97 20.13
23:44:57.556 +04:18:42.85  SN 2026oxx  2026-06-11.15 19.97
15:19:13.587 +27:52:58.57  SN 2026oxw  2026-06-11.02 19.96
09:53:09.311 +42:13:35.56  AT 2026oxv  2026-06-10.17 19.7446
20:30:02.168 +37:49:06.79  AT 2026oxu  2026-06-10.94 19.78
16:00:10.377 +22:09:10.94  AT 2026oxt  2026-06-11.03 19.379
17:32:05.150 +18:24:04.24  AT 2026oxs  2026-06-11.07 20.323
16:01:14.849 +29:49:20.54  AT 2026oxr  2026-06-08.41 18.733
18:33:36.042 +54:00:37.60  AT 2026oxq  2026-06-10.04 19.165
16:26:58.974 +50:28:07.45  AT 2026oxp  2026-06-10.01 20.192
19:48:49.856 +70:58:44.48  SN 2026oxo  2026-06-10.06 19.319
12:22:13.437 +27:24:59.57  AT 2026oxn  2026-06-10.94 19.381
23:01:57.544 -22:53:59.27  AT 2026oxm  2026-06-10.56 18.766
23:50:06.038 -14:01:39.26  AT 2026oxl  2026-06-10.58 18.422
13:13:55.656 -30:49:07.21  AT 2026oxk  2026-06-11.21 19.115
19:13:25.854 +49:32:53.84  AT 2026oxj  2026-06-10.06 19.005
23:31:30.736 +31:22:08.82  AT 2026oxi  2026-06-11.17 18.865
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 20 01:25 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sat Jun 20 01:25:21 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 27s (0.45 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 41s (0.68 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 27s (0.45 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 100s (1.67 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 14s (0.23 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 56s (0.93 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 73s (1.22 min)
FIELD_Boo-10-Q2b1x1: 188s (3.13 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 192s (3.20 min)
Finished: Sat Jun 20 01:28:33 CDT 2026