## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461168.80330059 08.05.2026 07:16:35.171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
First image: 2461168.80330059 08.05.2026 07:16:35.171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Last  image: 2461211.74142221 20.06.2026 05:47:28.879   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  5920
Objects passed selection criteria:  5911
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5192
Average stars matched: 5074.5 (97.7369 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   111852 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Jun 20 01:19:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461168.80330059 08.05.2026 07:16:35.171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
First image: 2461168.80330059 08.05.2026 07:16:35.171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Last  image: 2461211.74142221 20.06.2026 05:47:28.879   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 27
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  29914
Objects passed selection criteria:  29845
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 25490.8
Average stars matched: 24721.5 (96.9822 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   133224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Jun 20 01:20:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Boo-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Boo-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Boo-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 436736 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 436736 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits_preview.png'

Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits


renamed 'Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.png' -> 'transient_report/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits_preview.png'

Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 513.4187
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.1084
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1239.0918
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 477.6178
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1240.8568
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 473.4369
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.41341
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.009
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T00:46:50.0669260' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T05:46:50.0669260' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61211.2408572454 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T05:46:59.9680031' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61211.2409718516 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     213.329618579534 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9998313644355 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     49.0108333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     250.782222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.32378577420098 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Boo-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 13 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                355.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/d_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits :)

Spent 0.778171 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/d_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-20T00:47:28.8796806' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T05:47:28.8796806' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61211.2413064698 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T05:47:38.7828153' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61211.2414210881 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     213.329618601007 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9998313490689 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     48.8861111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =               250.92 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.32628978574092 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Boo-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 13 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29450 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 17.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 71.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                355.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            27.702216 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             20.50164 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/d_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits :)

Spent 0.729771 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/d_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits



fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.74097299
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:31.534 +14:02:11.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:31.534 +14:02:11.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0621 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:31.107 +14:02:45.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:31.107 +14:02:45.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0647 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  14:13:31.534 +14:02:11.82
Second-epoch second image center 14:13:31.107 +14:02:45.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00940 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.04nejZG14N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p54Fa76oz4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TLTNE8gYX6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bwDmvDMaP2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.7089 to +19.2738 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.7089 to 19.2738 deg
Loaded 3959 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3241 out of 3336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3336 out of 6086 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.814900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.814900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.26

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.26

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.7089 to +19.2738 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.7089 to 19.2738 deg
Loaded 3959 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3241 out of 3336 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3336 out of 6086 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 6128 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec +8.6829 to +19.2632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec 8.6829 to 19.2632 deg
Loaded 3960 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3259 out of 3337 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3337 out of 6128 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.3 pix  Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
 2.3 pix  Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
 3.7 pix  fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
 3.7 pix  fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
 2.3 pix  wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
 15.3 mag.  Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  11.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.04nejZG14N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=6086
Got 6086 stars (including 5750 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6027 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6028 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" 
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.555 n_q1=233 n_q2=251 n_q3=248 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p54Fa76oz4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=303, passed=6128
Got 6128 stars (including 5817 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6128 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=240 n_q2=244 n_q3=247 n_q4=236 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TLTNE8gYX6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=170, passed=4356
Got 4356 stars (including 4182 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4356 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=231 n_q2=247 n_q3=250 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bwDmvDMaP2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=157, passed=4333
Got 4333 stars (including 4173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4333 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=230 n_q2=232 n_q3=257 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.202
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.222
ref2=Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.148
new1=fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits sigma_overall=0.349 worst_q_ratio=1.103
new2=fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.202
reference average sigma_overall=0.454 worst_q_ratio=1.185
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:45:45.44 +15:03:11.6:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:45:45.44 +15:03:11.6:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:45.44 +15:03:11.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20446_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 20446_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    12.18    14:45:45.42 +15:03:11.5   0118 2197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    12.15    14:45:45.45 +15:03:11.7   0117 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:31.534 +14:02:11.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:31.534 +14:02:11.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0621 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.5'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:13:31.107 +14:02:45.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:13:17.386 +14:00:45.07
Second-epoch image center 14:13:31.107 +14:02:45.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0647 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  14:13:31.534 +14:02:11.82
Second-epoch second image center 14:13:31.107 +14:02:45.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00940 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.25fVMSZKeV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits &> /tmp/tmp.792KqpCX5K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JOMN9RLdJx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uk9lc3tLpf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits and wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits) and catalog (wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.6894 to +19.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.6894 to 19.2767 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 32198 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.691700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.691700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.41

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.41

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32198 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec +8.6894 to +19.2767 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0631 to 221.5649 deg, Dec 8.6894 to 19.2767 deg
Loaded 3965 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 32198 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 31729 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec +8.6829 to +19.2673 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 205.0632 to 221.5648 deg, Dec 8.6829 to 19.2673 deg
Loaded 3962 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3128 out of 3348 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3348 out of 31729 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
 2.2 pix  Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
 3.4 pix  fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
 3.3 pix  fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
 15.4 mag.  Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  13.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.25fVMSZKeV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1413, passed=32186
Got 32186 stars (including 30729 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32186 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" 
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.614 n_q1=236 n_q2=240 n_q3=250 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.792KqpCX5K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits' -> 'wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1394, passed=31720
Got 31720 stars (including 30277 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31720 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.7 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" 
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.562 n_q1=242 n_q2=231 n_q3=260 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits -region wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JOMN9RLdJx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=515, passed=19409
Got 19409 stars (including 18873 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19409 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19199 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=232 n_q2=244 n_q3=254 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uk9lc3tLpf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=513, passed=19357
Got 19357 stars (including 18830 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 550 (Dec 8.3 to 19.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=229 n_q2=231 n_q3=260 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits -region wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/wcs_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:45:08.91 +09:18:41.7:  13.61 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:45:45.45 +15:03:11.2:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:43:26.80 +11:06:58.9:  12.35 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:39:42.55 +11:49:51.3:  13.29 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:00:04.38 +14:20:57.5:  13.85 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:44:56.98 +17:51:37.5:  13.57 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:41:41.25 +13:48:37.1:  13.84 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:41:46.18 +10:32:39.5:  14.42 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:42:14.75 +13:10:53.7:  12.05 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:43:14.99 +17:43:32.5:  13.79 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:45:08.91 +09:18:41.7:  13.59 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:45:45.45 +15:03:11.2:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:45:45.45 +15:03:11.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:00:04.38 +14:20:57.5:  13.93 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.60 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:39:42.55 +11:49:51.3:  13.28 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:41:41.25 +13:48:37.1:  13.86 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:43:26.80 +11:06:58.9:  12.39 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:08.91 +09:18:41.7: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4223 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:44:56.98 +17:51:37.5:  13.49 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:04.38 +14:20:57.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6511 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.85 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:39:42.55 +11:49:51.3: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4784 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:41:41.25 +13:48:37.1: ref_mag=13.85 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4953 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:43:26.80 +11:06:58.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3268 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:44:56.98 +17:51:37.5: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7160 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:41:46.18 +10:32:39.5:  14.38 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.40 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:41:46.18 +10:32:39.5: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7349 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:43:14.99 +17:43:32.5:  13.67 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:43:14.99 +17:43:32.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3136 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:42:14.75 +13:10:53.7:  12.05 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:14.75 +13:10:53.7: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8214 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:45:28.26 +18:51:14.3:  13.58 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:42:32.34 +18:17:23.5:  12.78 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:46:25.86 +09:18:29.0:  13.40 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:42:31.47 +11:08:31.3:  12.61 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:43:17.71 +17:31:30.7:  13.84 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:43:44.03 +16:02:18.7:  13.53 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 14:42:24.44 +15:44:14.3:  13.93 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-08_02-16-35_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0277.fits at 13:42:41.68 +10:14:40.6:  12.29 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:45:28.26 +18:51:14.3:  13.57 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:42:32.34 +18:17:23.5:  12.81 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:42:31.47 +11:08:31.3:  12.64 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:28.26 +18:51:14.3: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2403 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:43:44.03 +16:02:18.7:  13.61 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:46:25.86 +09:18:29.0:  13.43 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:43:17.71 +17:31:30.7:  13.82 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:32.34 +18:17:23.5: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6753 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:31.47 +11:08:31.3: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3117 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 14:42:24.44 +15:44:14.3:  13.76 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:43:17.71 +17:31:30.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4704 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:43:44.03 +16:02:18.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3402 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:46:25.86 +09:18:29.0: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2509 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:42:24.44 +15:44:14.3: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3757 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-05-13_01-42-21_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0232.fits at 13:42:41.68 +10:14:40.6:  12.26 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:42:41.68 +10:14:40.6: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9112 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52281_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52281_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.94    13:44:56.93 +17:51:34.0   9064 1071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.60    13:44:57.04 +17:51:41.0   9063 1075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52282_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52282_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.48    14:39:42.55 +11:49:51.2   0833 4232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.48    14:39:42.55 +11:49:51.3   0832 4237   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52283_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52283_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.55    13:41:41.24 +13:48:37.4   9468 3550   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.46    13:41:41.26 +13:48:36.7   9467 3556   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52284_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52284_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    12.33    13:43:26.79 +11:06:58.9   9155 5182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    12.32    13:43:26.81 +11:06:58.8   9154 5188   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52438_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52438_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    12.10    14:45:45.44 +15:03:11.1   0118 2197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    12.05    14:45:45.47 +15:03:11.3   0117 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52473_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52473_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    12.24    14:38:07.84 +18:16:36.9   1416 0359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  14:38:07.83 +18:16:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52618_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.05    14:46:03.71 +17:23:16.4   0209 0779   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  14:46:03.72 +17:23:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52699_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.49    13:45:08.95 +09:18:40.5   8864 6275   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.38    13:45:08.87 +09:18:42.9   8863 6281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52715_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.54    13:53:01.10 +16:58:30.1   7863 1580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

**** FOUND  13:53:01.13 +16:58:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52730_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.65    14:00:04.42 +14:20:56.3   6762 3117   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.65    14:00:04.33 +14:20:58.7   6761 3122   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 52785_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.76    13:41:46.14 +10:32:38.6   9400 5542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.72    13:41:46.21 +10:32:40.5   9398 5547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18184_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 18184_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    11.82    13:42:14.75 +13:10:53.6   9373 3930   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    11.82    13:42:14.74 +13:10:53.8   9372 3936   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03846_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 03846_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.29    13:43:14.99 +17:43:31.8   9311 1158   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.35    13:43:14.99 +17:43:33.1   9310 1164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00765_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 00765_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.23    13:45:28.26 +18:51:13.1   9010 0461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.26    13:45:28.26 +18:51:15.5   9008 0466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50105_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 50105_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    12.30    13:42:31.45 +11:08:31.4   9295 5172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 3     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    12.32    13:42:31.48 +11:08:31.1   9294 5178   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50068_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 50068_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.22    13:46:25.81 +09:18:29.7   8669 6268   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 3     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.29    13:46:25.91 +09:18:28.2   8667 6274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50055_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 50055_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.44    13:43:43.99 +16:02:17.6   9205 2186   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 3     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.28    13:43:44.07 +16:02:19.9   9204 2191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04480_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 04480_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.46    13:43:17.70 +17:31:30.3   9300 1281   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.49    13:43:17.73 +17:31:31.1   9299 1286   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02194_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 02194_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    12.62    13:42:32.39 +18:17:23.9   9427 0815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    12.77    13:42:32.30 +18:17:23.0   9426 0821   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10113_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 10113_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    13.37    14:42:24.37 +15:44:14.8   0653 1832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 3     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    13.38    14:42:24.51 +15:44:13.8   0652 1837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25763_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201
The candidate 25763_fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 20.24097    2461211.74097    11.95    13:42:41.70 +10:14:40.3   9254 5720   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-46-50_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0200.fits
Discovery image 3     2026 06 20.24142    2461211.74142    11.88    13:42:41.66 +10:14:40.9   9252 5725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-20_CI_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_011648_TTUQ1b1x1_1748571_IDS6nVmR/fd_Boo-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-20_00-47-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0201.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Boo-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Boo-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.74097299 -observatory V36
07:37:20.88 +21:43:16.7 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:41:49.18 +20:19:16.9 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:24:48.00 +18:13:39.1 Mars (1.3mag)
07:58:43.21 +21:04:25.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:27.19 +03:04:57.5 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:03:00.47 +20:33:25.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:42.68 +00:19:49.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:35.06 -23:09:19.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:35:19.48 +07:24:54.5 Moon (-9.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 20 01:19 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.74097299:
07:58:38.22 +21:04:42.3 Io (6.2mag)
07:58:51.88 +21:03:56.0 Europa (6.3mag)
07:58:53.32 +21:03:48.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:59:04.81 +21:03:20.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:58:17.95 +20:42:20.8 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:58:46.43 +21:04:15.0 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:57:57.86 +20:52:50.4 Elara (17.6mag)
08:01:28.97 +21:09:31.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:04:44.82 +21:07:08.6 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:22.21 +03:05:26.8 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:32.30 +03:04:58.3 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:41.44 +03:07:21.0 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:31.32 +03:05:25.2 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:54.34 +03:05:08.8 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 20 01:19 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.74097299:
17:29:10.23 -35:32:49.7 JWST
18:27:33.83 +27:13:41.6 Chandra
19:35:56.76 +08:29:10.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 20 01:19 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.74097299 -observatory V36
18:34:24.03 -33:27:40.6 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:05:27.24 -67:59:41.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:31.23 +32:07:58.9 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:09:58.21 +15:49:30.1 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:11:55.95 -36:16:30.5 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:08.72 +31:59:33.5 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:48:42.61 +27:00:44.1 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:38:48.50 +30:37:58.2 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:18.87 +04:26:24.3 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:20:14.59 +21:42:12.0 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:30.26 -11:04:15.9 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:08:22.15 +67:10:31.1 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:16:25.89 -07:55:35.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:35.43 +80:09:53.8 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:27:57.31 +64:45:30.7 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:05:06.34 +28:47:48.6 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:28:19.99 +14:26:02.4 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:03:32.24 +34:35:25.9 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:30:04.00 -14:59:10.8 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:17:01.10 +32:25:46.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.39 +52:00:45.9 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:57:52.82 -11:27:59.6 15.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:34:50.68 +23:06:44.6 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:12.15 +04:33:25.4 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:48:38.25 +77:21:56.4 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:20:14.18 +44:12:13.0 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:14:59.17 +00:02:10.0 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:45:12.46 -09:56:26.0 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:24.47 -01:12:19.9 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:30:14.34 +27:12:11.8 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:25:39.08 +20:14:26.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:36:29.68 -05:41:48.1 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:22:35.98 +34:17:23.6 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:38:26.06 +18:36:16.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:45:50.38 +07:18:06.6 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:33:16.15 +30:53:45.7 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:18:04.34 +29:21:37.9 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:19:34.04 +32:26:29.2 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:11:25.86 +09:31:14.1 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:18:54.71 +19:58:35.6 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:57:24.31 +19:31:10.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:46:58.88 +16:57:36.7 16.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:50:33.33 +17:52:29.8 16.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:52:26.16 +17:17:00.6 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:05:49.02 -23:08:55.7 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:22:03.08 +28:17:21.6 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:37.05 +05:40:51.7 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:50:21.95 +04:41:20.2 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:47.47 -08:06:08.4 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:01:40.02 +34:51:43.3 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:04:16.94 +02:48:14.6 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:37:49.34 +34:29:04.2 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:54:55.31 +03:12:32.8 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:32.32 +07:32:37.4 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:17:01.99 +20:24:06.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:19:34.97 +40:48:45.4 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 20 01:19 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 20 01:19 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 20 01:19 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:34:07.980 +03:43:00.64  AT 2026oyb  2026-05-25.68 21.54
13:48:38.410 +04:03:32.72  AT 2026oya  2026-05-09.68 22.13
00:38:19.802 -05:15:31.84  AT 2026oxz  2026-06-08.47 19.6034
14:39:23.496 +35:21:27.84  AT 2026oxy  2026-06-04.97 20.13
23:44:57.556 +04:18:42.85  SN 2026oxx  2026-06-11.15 19.97
15:19:13.587 +27:52:58.57  SN 2026oxw  2026-06-11.02 19.96
09:53:09.311 +42:13:35.56  AT 2026oxv  2026-06-10.17 19.7446
20:30:02.168 +37:49:06.79  AT 2026oxu  2026-06-10.94 19.78
16:00:10.377 +22:09:10.94  AT 2026oxt  2026-06-11.03 19.379
17:32:05.150 +18:24:04.24  AT 2026oxs  2026-06-11.07 20.323
16:01:14.849 +29:49:20.54  AT 2026oxr  2026-06-08.41 18.733
18:33:36.042 +54:00:37.60  AT 2026oxq  2026-06-10.04 19.165
16:26:58.974 +50:28:07.45  AT 2026oxp  2026-06-10.01 20.192
19:48:49.856 +70:58:44.48  SN 2026oxo  2026-06-10.06 19.319
12:22:13.437 +27:24:59.57  AT 2026oxn  2026-06-10.94 19.381
23:01:57.544 -22:53:59.27  AT 2026oxm  2026-06-10.56 18.766
23:50:06.038 -14:01:39.26  AT 2026oxl  2026-06-10.58 18.422
13:13:55.656 -30:49:07.21  AT 2026oxk  2026-06-11.21 19.115
19:13:25.854 +49:32:53.84  AT 2026oxj  2026-06-10.06 19.005
23:31:30.736 +31:22:08.82  AT 2026oxi  2026-06-11.17 18.865
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 20 01:19 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sat Jun 20 01:18:41 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 30s (0.50 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 50s (0.83 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 91s (1.52 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 3 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 17s (0.28 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 53s (0.88 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 3s (0.05 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 75s (1.25 min)
FIELD_Boo-09-Q1b1x1: 182s (3.03 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 184s (3.07 min)
Finished: Sat Jun 20 01:21:45 CDT 2026