######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 493602 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 493602 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
renamed 'UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits_preview.png'
UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 449.0147
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 524.3424
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2174.3901
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 429.7190
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2165.4225
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 425.3222
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.84258
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.010
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-19T23:29:26.5335722' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T04:29:26.5335722' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61211.1871126504 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T04:29:36.4340075' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61211.1872272454 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997091818697 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 46.0001350835536 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.8433333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 310.445277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.46151494677114 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29490 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29490 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 353.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits :)
Spent 0.735418 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-19T23:30:02.7004943' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T04:30:02.7004943' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61211.1875312501 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T04:30:12.6044102' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61211.1876458796 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997091845162 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 46.0001350891351 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.7483333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 310.492777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.47067332987463 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+46 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29490 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29490 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 66.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 353.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits :)
Spent 0.901810 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/d_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.68722839
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:06.442 +46:00:22.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:06.442 +46:00:22.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0172 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:07.169 +46:00:04.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:07.169 +46:00:04.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0189 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:06.442 +46:00:22.12
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:07.169 +46:00:04.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00537 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KwHAyhWPhP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8AFYKSSW4m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KglNMGYynF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z6h1naM9fO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.906500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.906500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.48
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8609 to +51.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3127 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8609 to 51.4112 deg
Loaded 5369 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3785 out of 3992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 8167 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec +39.8864 to +51.4195 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.3128 to 155.8106 deg, Dec 39.8864 to 51.4195 deg
Loaded 5366 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3787 out of 3997 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3997 out of 8217 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.6 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
11.1 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
11.1 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.1 (SNR ) 9.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KwHAyhWPhP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=568, passed=8167
Got 8167 stars (including 7592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=213 n_q2=265 n_q3=256 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8AFYKSSW4m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=561, passed=8217
Got 8217 stars (including 7647 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8217 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8159 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=208 n_q2=265 n_q3=262 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KglNMGYynF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=22, passed=579
Got 579 stars (including 557 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 579 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 531 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 531 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 482 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 531 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 525 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 531 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 531 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 531 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 531 stars left (next iteration limit 584)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=531 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.518 n_q1=159 n_q2=118 n_q3=131 n_q4=123 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z6h1naM9fO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=20, passed=624
Got 624 stars (including 603 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 652 to 708 (Dec 40.6 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 577 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 580 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 652 to 708 (Dec 40.6 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 578 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 578 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 581 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 578 stars left (next iteration limit 634)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=578 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.516 n_q1=156 n_q2=148 n_q3=131 n_q4=143 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.274
ref2=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits sigma_overall=0.361 worst_q_ratio=1.257
new1=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits sigma_overall=0.453 worst_q_ratio=1.144
new2=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.117
reference average sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.2655
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114_astrometric_residuals.png (531 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115_astrometric_residuals.png (578 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:06.442 +46:00:22.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:06.442 +46:00:22.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0172 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:07.169 +46:00:04.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:00.662 +46:00:08.08
Second-epoch image center 09:36:07.169 +46:00:04.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0189 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:06.442 +46:00:22.12
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:07.169 +46:00:04.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00537 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X3xODn6qZ6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VzQJqiJad3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OrP5wStwRK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CPOsw6bk1H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits and wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.804800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.804800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43830 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8074 to +51.4128 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.1885 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8074 to 51.4128 deg
Loaded 5468 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3562 out of 4004 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4004 out of 43830 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 43644 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec +39.8196 to +51.4197 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 131.2455 to 155.9231 deg, Dec 39.8196 to 51.4197 deg
Loaded 5437 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3556 out of 4005 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4005 out of 43644 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 42 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
2.0 pix wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
11.8 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
11.8 mag. fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.8 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.X3xODn6qZ6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2151, passed=43808
Got 43808 stars (including 41580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43431 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=208 n_q2=259 n_q3=261 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.282
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-44-14_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0332.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VzQJqiJad3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=2132, passed=43630
Got 43630 stars (including 41415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43630 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43291 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=207 n_q2=259 n_q3=262 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits -region wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-45-00_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0333.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OrP5wStwRK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=52, passed=4416
Got 4416 stars (including 4358 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4416 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4388 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.505 n_q1=300 n_q2=213 n_q3=238 n_q4=203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CPOsw6bk1H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=43, passed=4664
Got 4664 stars (including 4614 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4664 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4632 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 650 to 708 (Dec 40.1 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=270 n_q2=240 n_q3=223 n_q4=223 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-29-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0114.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/wcs_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52869_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52869_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 8.33 | 08:53:22.50 +49:43:03.8 | 9118 0903 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52885_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 9.35 | 10:05:22.78 +49:07:15.7 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52892_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 9.32 | 09:27:37.55 +48:32:19.3 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52893_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52893_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 9.19 | 08:53:10.67 +45:17:14.4 | 9337 3591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52899_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52899_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 9.41 | 09:33:07.28 +43:09:26.8 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52906_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 9.76 | 09:50:56.18 +43:28:50.6 | 3083 4578 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52914_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52914_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 9.64 | 09:05:27.68 +45:02:55.6 | 8022 3807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52934_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52934_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.18 | 09:42:10.45 +49:08:15.0 | 4308 1267 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52936_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52936_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.02 | 09:11:04.25 +45:53:28.9 | 7411 3314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52941_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52941_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.34 | 09:49:22.93 +49:51:31.2 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 52951_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.32 | 10:14:00.56 +41:08:29.2 | 0303 5635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53011_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.62 | 09:21:12.04 +42:26:09.8 | 6318 5403 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53017_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 11.03 | 10:07:26.71 +47:16:13.6 | 1646 2079 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53054_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53054_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 11.32 | 09:48:06.96 +49:14:09.0 | 3730 1155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53067_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53067_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 11.25 | 09:32:17.24 +49:09:54.0 | 5281 1312 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53087_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 11.52 | 09:36:01.05 +49:17:48.7 | 4919 1213 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53143_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 11.85 | 09:29:00.24 +47:57:00.6 | 5576 2058 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53145_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53145_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 11.76 | 09:29:56.95 +42:21:29.8 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53150_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 53150_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 11.69 | 10:12:38.03 +48:01:38.8 | 1196 1536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03774_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 03774_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.82 | 09:03:25.80 +40:59:42.2 | 8348 6263 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:03:25.74 +40:59:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09523_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 09523_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.76 | 08:56:28.03 +42:12:23.9 | 9105 5488 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:28.04 +42:12:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07078_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 07078_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.66 | 08:56:14.84 +41:35:50.4 | 9155 5859 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:14.83 +41:35:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07277_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 07277_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.43 | 08:56:01.75 +41:38:48.5 | 9178 5827 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:01.80 +41:38:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12285_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 12285_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.53 | 08:55:28.13 +42:51:49.9 | 9191 5081 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:55:28.07 +42:51:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04227_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 04227_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.27 | 08:59:22.92 +40:59:41.4 | 8816 6246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:59:22.92 +40:59:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04777_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 04777_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 9.99 | 08:57:38.33 +41:04:27.3 | 9015 6187 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:57:38.27 +41:04:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05596_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 05596_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.96 | 08:56:47.94 +41:13:53.6 | 9107 6086 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:48.00 +41:13:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05661_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 05661_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 7.26 | 08:57:12.20 +41:20:27.6 | 9056 6022 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:57:12.22 +41:20:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19599_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 19599_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.66 | 09:28:40.06 +45:36:03.2 | 5557 3473 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:28:40.05 +45:36:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20580_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 20580_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.62 | 09:48:35.71 +46:01:14.7 | 3491 3080 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:48:35.71 +46:01:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11131_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 11131_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.24 | 09:13:48.22 +43:13:04.6 | 7139 4934 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:13:48.19 +43:13:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22729_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 22729_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.37 | 08:52:11.86 +45:18:45.7 | 9442 3568 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:52:11.84 +45:18:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39947_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 39947_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.46 | 10:19:26.52 +48:23:45.3 | 0553 1184 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 10:19:26.51 +48:23:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35033_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 35033_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.58 | 09:55:42.97 +49:49:12.1 | 3028 0719 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:55:42.96 +49:49:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23303_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 23303_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.17 | 08:56:49.68 +45:37:53.5 | 8930 3409 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:49.70 +45:37:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37245_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 37245_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.49 | 09:05:24.09 +48:31:49.2 | 7953 1701 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:05:24.10 +48:31:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38233_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 38233_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 5.61 | 08:59:11.52 +48:02:25.4 | 8597 1965 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:59:11.54 +48:02:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06656_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 06656_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 5.61 | 09:00:37.46 +41:46:52.7 | 8647 5771 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:00:37.49 +41:46:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00205_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 00205_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 6.19 | 09:57:40.81 +41:03:19.9 | 2157 5955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:57:40.78 +41:03:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42157_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 42157_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 5.62 | 09:03:37.79 +47:09:23.0 | 8166 2525 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 09:03:37.75 +47:09:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07521_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 07521_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 5.88 | 10:17:05.29 +42:54:53.0 | 0158 4507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 10:17:05.30 +42:54:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11427_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115
The candidate 11427_fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.18765 | 2461211.68765 | 10.77 | 08:56:14.98 +42:40:04.3 | 9111 5205 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_233849_TTUQ1b1x1_2883772_XdNJLKka/fd_UMa-09-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_23-30-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0115.fits |
**** FOUND 08:56:14.97 +42:40:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.68722839 -observatory V36
07:37:11.74 +21:44:20.2 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:41:33.83 +20:20:17.3 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:24:38.46 +18:13:02.2 Mars (1.3mag)
07:58:40.39 +21:04:33.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:26.45 +03:04:53.8 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:02:59.73 +20:33:23.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:42.56 +00:19:48.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:35.29 -23:09:17.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:32:50.63 +07:46:44.3 Moon (-9.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 19 23:42 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.68722839:
07:58:35.10 +21:04:50.7 Io (6.2mag)
07:58:49.73 +21:04:01.8 Europa (6.3mag)
07:58:51.15 +21:03:54.3 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:59:01.55 +21:03:30.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:58:15.31 +20:42:28.0 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:58:41.98 +21:04:28.6 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:57:55.30 +20:52:58.8 Elara (17.6mag)
08:01:25.99 +21:09:41.2 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:04:42.15 +21:07:16.2 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:21.68 +03:05:23.2 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:31.67 +03:04:53.7 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:40.82 +03:07:17.5 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:30.81 +03:05:21.2 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:53.68 +03:05:05.5 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 19 23:42 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.68722839:
17:29:25.40 -35:32:12.4 JWST
18:25:17.41 +28:28:47.3 Chandra
19:00:02.33 -11:20:55.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 19 23:42 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.68722839 -observatory V36
18:34:26.70 -33:27:28.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:05:23.98 -67:59:42.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:30.02 +32:07:56.2 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:09:59.48 +15:49:24.6 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:11:23.52 -36:22:12.5 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:09.87 +31:59:27.9 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:48:38.69 +27:00:44.1 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:38:45.96 +30:38:06.0 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:16.98 +04:26:17.3 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:20:16.76 +21:42:12.4 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:31.18 -11:04:14.2 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:08:24.34 +67:10:22.1 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:16:33.90 -07:55:14.4 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:34.54 +80:10:40.8 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:27:52.36 +64:45:23.1 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:05:01.66 +28:47:35.1 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:28:22.26 +14:25:50.2 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:03:35.23 +34:34:32.7 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:30:00.76 -14:59:24.8 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:16:58.14 +32:26:19.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.47 +52:00:58.7 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:57:49.69 -11:27:48.9 15.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:34:47.60 +23:06:49.6 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:11.82 +04:33:29.1 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:48:46.34 +77:21:26.8 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:20:09.26 +44:12:01.2 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:14:57.90 +00:01:16.8 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:45:06.89 -09:55:54.0 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:23.42 -01:12:15.1 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:30:09.38 +27:11:47.6 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:25:32.21 +20:15:24.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:36:27.31 -05:41:57.0 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:22:25.45 +34:17:15.9 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:38:18.14 +18:35:57.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:45:43.91 +07:17:29.9 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:33:05.83 +30:53:41.4 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:17:54.59 +29:21:13.5 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:19:26.16 +32:26:41.8 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:11:20.10 +09:32:35.8 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:18:49.35 +19:58:25.2 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:57:17.93 +19:31:05.1 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:46:46.61 +16:58:08.7 16.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:50:20.73 +17:52:33.2 16.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:52:11.16 +17:16:51.4 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:05:46.90 -23:09:18.5 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:21:51.92 +28:16:15.8 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:39.23 +05:39:40.5 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:50:13.44 +04:40:46.9 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:49.54 -08:06:10.9 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:01:32.84 +34:51:55.8 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:04:08.22 +02:46:47.6 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:37:40.06 +34:28:35.3 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:54:41.38 +03:09:44.8 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:33.41 +07:32:48.6 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:16:59.25 +20:24:12.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:19:29.71 +40:49:00.3 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 19 23:42 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 19 23:42 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 19 23:42 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:39:23.496 +35:21:27.84 AT 2026oxy 2026-06-04.97 20.13
23:44:57.556 +04:18:42.85 SN 2026oxx 2026-06-11.15 19.97
15:19:13.587 +27:52:58.57 SN 2026oxw 2026-06-11.02 19.96
09:53:09.311 +42:13:35.56 AT 2026oxv 2026-06-10.17 19.7446
20:30:02.168 +37:49:06.79 AT 2026oxu 2026-06-10.94 19.78
16:00:10.377 +22:09:10.94 AT 2026oxt 2026-06-11.03 19.379
17:32:05.150 +18:24:04.24 AT 2026oxs 2026-06-11.07 20.323
16:01:14.849 +29:49:20.54 AT 2026oxr 2026-06-08.41 18.733
18:33:36.042 +54:00:37.60 AT 2026oxq 2026-06-10.04 19.165
16:26:58.974 +50:28:07.45 AT 2026oxp 2026-06-10.01 20.192
19:48:49.856 +70:58:44.48 SN 2026oxo 2026-06-10.06 19.319
12:22:13.437 +27:24:59.57 AT 2026oxn 2026-06-10.94 19.381
23:01:57.544 -22:53:59.27 AT 2026oxm 2026-06-10.56 18.766
23:50:06.038 -14:01:39.26 AT 2026oxl 2026-06-10.58 18.422
13:13:55.656 -30:49:07.21 AT 2026oxk 2026-06-11.21 19.115
19:13:25.854 +49:32:53.84 AT 2026oxj 2026-06-10.06 19.005
23:31:30.736 +31:22:08.82 AT 2026oxi 2026-06-11.17 18.865
21:36:15.644 -21:19:14.62 AT 2026oxh 2026-06-10.53 18.749
22:37:33.079 +29:47:40.75 AT 2026oxg 2026-06-11.14 19.184
20:53:38.599 -35:13:40.58 SN 2026oxf 2026-06-10.52 18.812
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 19 23:42 tns_transients_list.txt