######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 515055 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 515055 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits_preview.png'
Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits

renamed 'Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits_preview.png'
Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 477.1196
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 464.9675
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2453.4873
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 621.7791
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2460.2185
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 622.4763
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 5.14229
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-19T22:49:15.8627085' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T03:49:15.8627085' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61211.159211366 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T03:49:25.7667485' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61211.1593259955 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 152.304055006076 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 21.9997454960526 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.1447222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 279.259722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.18381348858854 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29501 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29501 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 317.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.300344 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits :)
Spent 0.704942 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-19T22:49:54.9451181' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-20T03:49:54.9451181' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61211.1596637154 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-20T03:50:04.8455730' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61211.1597782988 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 152.304055029436 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 21.9997454896179 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.0144444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 279.336944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.19345388725712 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29501 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29501 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 17.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 65.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 317.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.300344 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits :)
Spent 0.733251 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/d_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits

fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461211.65932711
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:17.018 +21:59:51.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:17.018 +21:59:51.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:15.541 +22:00:18.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:15.541 +22:00:18.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:17.018 +21:59:51.00
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:15.541 +22:00:18.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00954 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XCIr0oEAqB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Klda9xI1dk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.B8qk7cADxK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OOCPPgKewI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec +16.5185 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec 16.5185 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3734 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3734 out of 6437 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.758100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.758100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec +16.5185 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec 16.5185 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3734 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3734 out of 6437 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5061 to 160.9546 deg, Dec +16.5183 to +27.2615 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5061 to 160.9546 deg, Dec 16.5183 to 27.2615 deg
Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3596 out of 3736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 6417 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.5 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XCIr0oEAqB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=6437
Got 6437 stars (including 6029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=203 n_q2=247 n_q3=183 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Klda9xI1dk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, passed=6417
Got 6417 stars (including 6016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=202 n_q2=249 n_q3=184 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.B8qk7cADxK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=236, passed=2965
Got 2965 stars (including 2725 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 900 stars left (next iteration limit 990)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits N_match=900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=220 n_q2=236 n_q3=197 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OOCPPgKewI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=243, passed=2936
Got 2936 stars (including 2688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2936 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 897 stars left (next iteration limit 986)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=221 n_q2=228 n_q3=202 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.213
ref2=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.273
new1=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.159
new2=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.133
reference average sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (904 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (905 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066_astrometric_residuals.png (900 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (897 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:17.018 +21:59:51.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:17.018 +21:59:51.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0142 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:09:15.541 +22:00:18.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77
Second-epoch image center 10:09:15.541 +22:00:18.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0063 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:09:17.018 +21:59:51.00
Second-epoch second image center 10:09:15.541 +22:00:18.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00954 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vRo2UhGK9p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1hZFZLkNtk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G54uaW3FYc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eUGrR87BlF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec +16.4881 to +27.2792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec 16.4881 to 27.2792 deg
Loaded 4577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3478 out of 3774 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 33023 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.649450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.649450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec +16.4881 to +27.2792 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec 16.4881 to 27.2792 deg
Loaded 4577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3478 out of 3774 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 33023 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=5.2)
Read 33297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.4729 to 160.9668 deg, Dec +16.4866 to +27.2736 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.4729 to 160.9668 deg, Dec 16.4866 to 27.2736 deg
Loaded 4585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3482 out of 3776 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3776 out of 33297 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.2 pix Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vRo2UhGK9p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=1503, passed=32992
Got 32992 stars (including 31441 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32343 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32342 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 899 stars left (next iteration limit 988)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.522 n_q1=198 n_q2=245 n_q3=183 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1hZFZLkNtk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1479, passed=33280
Got 33280 stars (including 31754 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32566 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.674 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=198 n_q2=251 n_q3=181 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G54uaW3FYc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=494, passed=19642
Got 19642 stars (including 19113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19642 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 893 stars left (next iteration limit 982)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits N_match=893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.346 n_q1=213 n_q2=231 n_q3=202 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eUGrR87BlF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=526, passed=19655
Got 19655 stars (including 19088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 19655 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 883 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 19350 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 892 stars left (next iteration limit 981)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=210 n_q2=227 n_q3=208 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.067
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 09:51:26.37 +24:23:59.8: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:21:23.32 +20:17:49.5: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:16:05.98 +24:06:23.6: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:24:13.74 +21:12:08.1: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:21:23.32 +20:17:49.5: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 09:51:26.37 +24:23:59.8: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:16:05.98 +24:06:23.6: 14.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:21:23.32 +20:17:49.5: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.9992 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:51:26.37 +24:23:59.8: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.4275 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:05.98 +24:06:23.6: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5724 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:24:13.74 +21:12:08.1: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:13.74 +21:12:08.1: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2135 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:26:11.52 +20:15:32.2: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:22:46.57 +21:07:07.8: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:16:46.30 +23:01:15.8: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:26:11.52 +20:15:32.2: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:11.52 +20:15:32.2: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3975 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:16:46.30 +23:01:15.8: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:22:46.57 +21:07:07.8: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:22:46.57 +21:07:07.8: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8038 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:46.30 +23:01:15.8: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5879 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52565_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52565_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.15933 | 2461211.65933 | 14.44 | 09:51:26.45 +24:23:58.7 | 7326 1858 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 14.41 | 09:51:26.29 +24:24:01.0 | 7323 1863 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52566_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.15933 | 2461211.65933 | 14.52 | 10:16:05.95 +24:06:25.1 | 3932 1865 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 14.68 | 10:16:06.00 +24:06:22.1 | 3928 1870 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52567_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52567_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.15933 | 2461211.65933 | 14.31 | 10:24:13.68 +21:12:07.4 | 2667 3522 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 14.14 | 10:24:13.81 +21:12:08.7 | 2663 3526 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52568_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52568_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.15933 | 2461211.65933 | 14.23 | 10:21:23.28 +20:17:49.1 | 3021 4098 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.88 | 10:21:23.35 +20:17:50.0 | 3017 4103 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52569_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52569_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 14.10 | 09:40:05.90 +26:28:54.8 | 8916 0619 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 09:40:05.95 +26:28:54.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.01 | 09:37:04.65 +26:29:05.2 | 9334 0616 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 09:37:04.71 +26:29:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52573_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 12.99 | 10:16:44.39 +18:22:13.0 | 3587 5313 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:16:44.36 +18:22:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52754_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52754_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 12.03 | 10:16:48.87 +24:27:18.0 | 3846 1653 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:16:48.87 +24:27:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52858_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 12.89 | 10:43:31.70 +24:55:18.8 | 0194 1002 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:43:31.60 +24:55:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52885_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 12.92 | 10:43:38.53 +25:23:28.0 | 0211 0715 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:43:38.50 +25:23:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52910_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52910_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 12.89 | 09:51:55.58 +24:21:47.4 | 7255 1883 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 09:51:55.59 +24:21:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52939_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52939_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.02 | 10:23:52.10 +19:34:29.4 | 2630 4509 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:23:52.08 +19:34:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52969_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.12 | 10:26:52.49 +19:22:41.8 | 2191 4592 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:26:52.46 +19:22:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52980_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.08 | 09:52:39.13 +25:58:50.4 | 7189 0901 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 09:52:39.15 +25:58:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53007_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.13 | 09:47:36.00 +26:13:11.7 | 7883 0770 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 09:47:35.95 +26:13:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53020_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.35 | 10:41:54.05 +22:05:03.7 | 0224 2748 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:41:54.05 +22:05:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53061_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.15933 | 2461211.65933 | 13.43 | 10:26:11.50 +20:15:32.4 | 2340 4066 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.38 | 10:26:11.53 +20:15:31.9 | 2336 4070 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53087_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.41 | 09:51:44.15 +20:10:34.5 | 7199 4411 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 09:51:44.21 +20:10:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53108_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53108_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.15933 | 2461211.65933 | 13.55 | 10:16:46.32 +23:01:15.9 | 3792 2511 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.63 | 10:16:46.28 +23:01:15.7 | 3789 2515 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53157_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53157_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.40 | 10:14:34.17 +21:11:01.7 | 4016 3640 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:14:34.22 +21:11:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53208_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53208_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.58 | 10:20:25.25 +25:41:02.5 | 3410 0873 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:20:25.26 +25:41:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53230_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53230_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 20.15933 | 2461211.65933 | 13.86 | 10:22:46.61 +21:07:07.9 | 2866 3589 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 13.76 | 10:22:46.54 +21:07:07.6 | 2863 3593 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31518_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 31518_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 10.09 | 09:43:25.72 +19:51:39.7 | 8381 4636 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 09:43:25.71 +19:51:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 20.15978 | 2461211.65978 | 11.11 | 10:00:01.91 +21:15:42.7 | 6053 3710 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-19_CI_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_225446_TTUQ1b1x1_2068224_9Ia8hiaL/fd_Leo-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-19_22-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits |
**** FOUND 10:00:01.92 +21:15:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Leo-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.65932711 -observatory V36
07:37:07.00 +21:44:53.2 Mercury (0.9mag)
08:41:25.89 +20:20:48.7 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:24:33.50 +18:12:43.0 Mars (1.3mag)
07:58:38.93 +21:04:37.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:26.06 +03:04:51.9 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:02:59.35 +20:33:22.1 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:42.49 +00:19:48.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:35.41 -23:09:17.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
10:31:41.29 +07:58:04.4 Moon (-9.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 19 22:57 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.65932711:
07:58:33.58 +21:04:54.8 Io (6.2mag)
07:58:48.58 +21:04:04.9 Europa (6.3mag)
07:58:50.02 +21:03:57.4 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:58:59.86 +21:03:35.0 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:58:13.94 +20:42:31.8 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:58:39.60 +21:04:35.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
07:57:53.97 +20:53:03.2 Elara (17.6mag)
08:01:24.45 +21:09:46.2 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:04:40.77 +21:07:20.1 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:21.41 +03:05:21.3 Titan (8.6mag)
00:52:31.33 +03:04:51.4 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:40.50 +03:07:15.7 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:30.54 +03:05:19.2 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:53.33 +03:05:03.9 Phoebe (16.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 19 22:57 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461211.65932711:
17:29:32.17 -35:31:38.2 JWST
18:23:49.59 +29:03:26.6 Chandra
18:44:46.45 -19:16:14.7 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 19 22:57 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461211.65932711 -observatory V36
18:34:28.08 -33:27:22.4 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:05:22.29 -67:59:42.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:53:29.39 +32:07:54.8 17.6mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:10:00.13 +15:49:21.7 17.9mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
23:11:06.55 -36:25:09.9 15.9mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:10.46 +31:59:25.1 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:48:36.66 +27:00:44.2 16.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:38:44.65 +30:38:10.1 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:57:15.99 +04:26:13.6 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:20:17.88 +21:42:12.6 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:15:31.66 -11:04:13.3 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:08:25.47 +67:10:17.4 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:16:38.05 -07:55:03.7 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:34.09 +80:11:05.1 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:27:49.79 +64:45:19.1 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:04:59.23 +28:47:28.2 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:28:23.44 +14:25:43.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:03:36.77 +34:34:05.1 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:29:59.08 -14:59:32.1 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:16:56.60 +32:26:36.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:04.52 +52:01:05.3 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:57:48.08 -11:27:43.5 15.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:34:46.00 +23:06:52.2 17.8mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:11.65 +04:33:31.0 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:48:50.51 +77:21:11.3 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:20:06.70 +44:11:55.2 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:14:57.24 +00:00:49.1 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:45:03.97 -09:55:37.4 8.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:05:22.87 -01:12:12.5 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:30:06.80 +27:11:35.1 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:25:28.65 +20:15:55.1 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:36:26.08 -05:42:01.7 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:22:20.00 +34:17:11.9 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:38:14.03 +18:35:46.8 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:45:40.54 +07:17:10.9 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:33:00.47 +30:53:39.2 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:17:49.53 +29:21:00.8 17.3mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:19:22.08 +32:26:48.3 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:11:17.12 +09:33:18.2 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:18:46.57 +19:58:19.9 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:57:14.61 +19:31:02.6 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:46:40.25 +16:58:25.3 16.2mag 141P/Machholz
06:50:14.19 +17:52:35.0 16.1mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:52:03.38 +17:16:46.7 13.0mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:05:45.79 -23:09:30.4 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:21:46.13 +28:15:41.7 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:32:40.33 +05:39:03.5 16.2mag 169P/NEAT
00:50:09.01 +04:40:29.6 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:43:50.61 -08:06:12.1 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
08:01:29.11 +34:52:02.3 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
01:04:03.68 +02:46:02.4 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:37:35.24 +34:28:20.4 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:54:34.09 +03:08:17.5 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:10:33.98 +07:32:54.4 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:16:57.83 +20:24:15.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:19:26.98 +40:49:08.1 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 19 22:57 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 19 22:57 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 19 22:57 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:39:23.496 +35:21:27.84 AT 2026oxy 2026-06-04.97 20.13
23:44:57.556 +04:18:42.85 SN 2026oxx 2026-06-11.15 19.97
15:19:13.587 +27:52:58.57 SN 2026oxw 2026-06-11.02 19.96
09:53:09.311 +42:13:35.56 AT 2026oxv 2026-06-10.17 19.7446
20:30:02.168 +37:49:06.79 AT 2026oxu 2026-06-10.94 19.78
16:00:10.377 +22:09:10.94 AT 2026oxt 2026-06-11.03 19.379
17:32:05.150 +18:24:04.24 AT 2026oxs 2026-06-11.07 20.323
16:01:14.849 +29:49:20.54 AT 2026oxr 2026-06-08.41 18.733
18:33:36.042 +54:00:37.60 AT 2026oxq 2026-06-10.04 19.165
16:26:58.974 +50:28:07.45 AT 2026oxp 2026-06-10.01 20.192
19:48:49.856 +70:58:44.48 SN 2026oxo 2026-06-10.06 19.319
12:22:13.437 +27:24:59.57 AT 2026oxn 2026-06-10.94 19.381
23:01:57.544 -22:53:59.27 AT 2026oxm 2026-06-10.56 18.766
23:50:06.038 -14:01:39.26 AT 2026oxl 2026-06-10.58 18.422
13:13:55.656 -30:49:07.21 AT 2026oxk 2026-06-11.21 19.115
19:13:25.854 +49:32:53.84 AT 2026oxj 2026-06-10.06 19.005
23:31:30.736 +31:22:08.82 AT 2026oxi 2026-06-11.17 18.865
21:36:15.644 -21:19:14.62 AT 2026oxh 2026-06-10.53 18.749
22:37:33.079 +29:47:40.75 AT 2026oxg 2026-06-11.14 19.184
20:53:38.599 -35:13:40.58 SN 2026oxf 2026-06-10.52 18.812
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 19 22:57 tns_transients_list.txt