NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-04-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.92    07:52:14.72 +82:35:15.1   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.09    07:52:16.93 +82:35:20.3   4494 6246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 18.4285  2461209.9285  13.01  07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7
131.10136  28.83493 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.8" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7:  15.96 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7:  15.64 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cam-04-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 572506 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 572506 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits_preview.png'
Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits

renamed 'Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits_preview.png'
Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.9569 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 576.8255 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1627.8720 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 553.2321 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1668.8986 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 555.5894 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.90714 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-18T05:16:30.1718098' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T10:16:30.1718098' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.4281269792 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T10:16:40.0720423' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.4282415742 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 119.997027464896 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4994486529997 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.7241666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.15777777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.68508906121746 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29477 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29477 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 47.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 65.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.800864 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/d_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits :) Spent 0.967051 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/d_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 20.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-18T05:17:09.7873807' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T10:17:09.7873807' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.4285854977 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T10:17:19.6893770' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.4287001044 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 119.997027485369 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4994486813872 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 21.7344444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 4.19527777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.68389857901891 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29477 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29477 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 8.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 47.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 20.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 65.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 10.800864 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/d_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits :) Spent 0.998428 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/d_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits


fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.92824272 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits' wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:57.117 +77:31:04.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05 Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.117 +77:31:04.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:59.702 +77:31:12.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05 Second-epoch image center 07:59:59.702 +77:31:12.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:59:57.117 +77:31:04.47 Second-epoch second image center 07:59:59.702 +77:31:12.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00313 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4rOuxqMWJN Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bsblnKqLqp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JeXqNYnbZh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DjF8u6f4G1 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1573 to 167.1070 deg, Dec +70.6354 to +82.7620 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1573 to 167.1070 deg, Dec 70.6354 to 82.7620 deg Loaded 13335 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7093 out of 7406 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7406 out of 12435 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.878800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.878800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1573 to 167.1070 deg, Dec +70.6354 to +82.7620 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1573 to 167.1070 deg, Dec 70.6354 to 82.7620 deg Loaded 13335 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7093 out of 7406 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7406 out of 12435 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=6.6) Read 9856 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 73.1549 to 167.1050 deg, Dec +70.6351 to +82.7619 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 73.1549 to 167.1050 deg, Dec 70.6351 to 82.7619 deg Loaded 13336 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6885 out of 7110 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7110 out of 9856 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits (aperture=6.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.4 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 2.5 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits 3.5 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits 2.4 pix wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 14.9 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.4rOuxqMWJN (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, passed=12435 Got 12435 stars (including 11671 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12435 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12247 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12246 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12246 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.694 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.556 n_q1=236 n_q2=298 n_q3=207 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bsblnKqLqp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=585, passed=9856 Got 9856 stars (including 9267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9856 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9721 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.495 n_q1=226 n_q2=292 n_q3=221 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.357 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.JeXqNYnbZh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=257, passed=7558 Got 7558 stars (including 7298 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7558 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7476 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7478 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7478 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=227 n_q2=223 n_q3=294 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.386 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.DjF8u6f4G1 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, passed=7349 Got 7349 stars (including 7099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7349 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7274 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7275 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7275 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=229 n_q2=224 n_q3=291 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.326 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits sigma_overall=0.475 worst_q_ratio=1.461 ref2=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.357 new1=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.386 new2=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.326 reference average sigma_overall=0.4735 worst_q_ratio=1.409 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:31:14.40 +70:57:41.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:48:10.25 +71:55:26.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:34:08.55 +71:06:01.3: 10.60 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 08:48:10.25 +71:55:26.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:10.25 +71:55:26.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:34:08.55 +71:06:01.3: 10.61 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.60 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:08.55 +71:06:01.3: ref_mag=10.60 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6658 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:31:14.40 +70:57:41.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:31:14.40 +70:57:41.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20048_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 20048_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    7.60    09:34:23.42 +71:05:17.1   9470 0427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 09:34:23.41 +71:05:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20071_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 20071_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    9.26    08:48:10.28 +71:55:26.1   7188 0157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    9.25    08:48:10.23 +71:55:26.1   7186 0155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20128_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 20128_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    10.61    09:34:08.50 +71:06:01.4   9457 0430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    10.75    09:34:08.59 +71:06:01.2   9455 0428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20137_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 20137_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    10.71    06:25:56.77 +75:27:04.4   1340 2483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 06:25:56.77 +75:27:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20170_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 20170_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    11.01    09:31:14.43 +70:57:41.5   9362 0293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.17    09:31:14.37 +70:57:41.9   9360 0291   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 20272_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.78    08:10:04.13 +74:19:45.5   5289 1305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 08:10:04.10 +74:19:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20014_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 20014_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    9.81    08:03:59.71 +73:24:30.7   5078 0731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 08:03:59.73 +73:24:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:57.117 +77:31:04.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05 Second-epoch image center 07:59:57.117 +77:31:04.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0192 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Image size: 941.0'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 07:59:59.702 +77:31:12.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:00:02.055 +77:29:57.05 Second-epoch image center 07:59:59.702 +77:31:12.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0209 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 07:59:57.117 +77:31:04.47 Second-epoch second image center 07:59:59.702 +77:31:12.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00313 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pGoXUhFwON Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FW5JukZpLg Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FEttA9G0d7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yAWVHKOCy8 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9511 to 167.1942 deg, Dec +70.6184 to +82.7648 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9511 to 167.1942 deg, Dec 70.6184 to 82.7648 deg Loaded 13420 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6512 out of 7463 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7463 out of 66718 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.764900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.764900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.37 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 66718 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9511 to 167.1942 deg, Dec +70.6184 to +82.7648 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9511 to 167.1942 deg, Dec 70.6184 to 82.7648 deg Loaded 13420 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6512 out of 7463 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7463 out of 66718 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=5.2) Read 56378 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 72.9417 to 167.1049 deg, Dec +70.6176 to +82.7620 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 72.9417 to 167.1049 deg, Dec 70.6176 to 82.7620 deg Loaded 13403 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6663 out of 7458 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7458 out of 56378 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 81 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 2.2 pix Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits 3.4 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits 3.4 pix fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits 2.3 pix wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 15.1 mag. Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits 14.3 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits 14.2 mag. fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.pGoXUhFwON (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4412, passed=66694 Got 66694 stars (including 62211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66694 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65976 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65975 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65975 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.687 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=240 n_q2=289 n_q3=205 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.391 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FW5JukZpLg (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3289, passed=56351 Got 56351 stars (including 52998 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56351 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55866 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 803 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55868 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55868 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.533 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.575 n_q1=226 n_q2=295 n_q3=200 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.268 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits -region wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FEttA9G0d7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1465, passed=34063 Got 34063 stars (including 32561 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34063 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33704 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33705 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33705 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=226 n_q2=209 n_q3=297 n_q4=237 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.443 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.yAWVHKOCy8 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1530, passed=33348 Got 33348 stars (including 31780 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33348 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32984 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=222 n_q2=210 n_q3=297 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.324 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/wcs_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:34:08.51 +71:06:01.4: 10.67 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:33:03.49 +71:20:30.5: 11.42 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:41:19.59 +82:15:58.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:31:14.36 +70:57:41.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:16:08.14 +79:03:46.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:48:10.25 +71:55:26.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:31:55.75 +71:18:15.5: 10.80 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:31:14.36 +70:57:41.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:31:14.36 +70:57:41.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:16:08.14 +79:03:46.6: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:33:03.49 +71:20:30.5: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 08:48:10.25 +71:55:26.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:48:10.25 +71:55:26.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:34:08.51 +71:06:01.4: 10.74 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:41:19.59 +82:15:58.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:19.59 +82:15:58.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:31:55.75 +71:18:15.5: 10.87 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.45 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.70 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:08.14 +79:03:46.6: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8510 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:03.49 +71:20:30.5: ref_mag=11.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2661 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:08.51 +71:06:01.4: ref_mag=10.70 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6271 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:31:55.75 +71:18:15.5: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6743 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:20:10.39 +80:28:22.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:32:39.87 +71:13:21.3: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:04:36.57 +79:22:41.8: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:35:13.72 +71:13:06.1: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:29:10.86 +75:24:26.4: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:20:03.11 +80:28:12.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:33:27.90 +71:06:29.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:22:43.95 +71:14:07.7: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:20:10.39 +80:28:22.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:10.39 +80:28:22.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:32:39.87 +71:13:21.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:32:39.87 +71:13:21.3: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2440 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:04:36.57 +79:22:41.8: 13.03 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:35:13.72 +71:13:06.1: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.65 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:33:27.90 +71:06:29.5: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:04:36.57 +79:22:41.8: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6139 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:29:10.86 +75:24:26.4: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:35:13.72 +71:13:06.1: ref_mag=12.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4007 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:27.90 +71:06:29.5: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3873 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:10.86 +75:24:26.4: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4243 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:20:03.11 +80:28:12.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:20:03.11 +80:28:12.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:22:43.95 +71:14:07.7: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:22:43.95 +71:14:07.7: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5672 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:41:10.50 +75:26:55.1: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:31:00.08 +77:52:07.2: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:41:10.50 +75:26:55.1: 12.94 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:10.50 +75:26:55.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6246 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:07:58.05 +79:12:42.2: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:21:35.22 +72:50:45.0: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 08:20:56.86 +75:54:21.2: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:23:37.22 +71:13:08.4: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:36:27.57 +81:21:22.8: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:31:00.08 +77:52:07.2: 13.07 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:00.08 +77:52:07.2: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6863 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:34:33.95 +71:40:50.0: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:07:58.05 +79:12:42.2: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:07:58.05 +79:12:42.2: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9450 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:21:35.22 +72:50:45.0: 13.12 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:23:37.22 +71:13:08.4: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 08:20:56.86 +75:54:21.2: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:21:35.22 +72:50:45.0: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7615 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:23:37.22 +71:13:08.4: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8600 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:20:56.86 +75:54:21.2: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7822 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:36:27.57 +81:21:22.8: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:27.57 +81:21:22.8: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9042 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:05:02.23 +71:37:17.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:34:33.95 +71:40:50.0: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:33.95 +71:40:50.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7783 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:33:45.48 +71:42:24.6: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:05:02.23 +71:37:17.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:05:02.23 +71:37:17.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:16:56.04 +78:44:19.6: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:11:00.35 +80:50:56.8: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:30:51.91 +71:18:58.5: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:36:32.85 +71:30:41.9: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:33:11.93 +71:53:35.4: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:33:45.48 +71:42:24.6: 13.27 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:45.48 +71:42:24.6: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0276 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:49:02.28 +77:50:31.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:30:51.91 +71:18:58.5: 13.64 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:16:56.04 +78:44:19.6: 13.83 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:30:51.91 +71:18:58.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2609 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:56.04 +78:44:19.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4121 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:11:00.35 +80:50:56.8: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:36:32.85 +71:30:41.9: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:11:00.35 +80:50:56.8: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2670 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:32.85 +71:30:41.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2663 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:33:11.93 +71:53:35.4: 13.48 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:11.93 +71:53:35.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1958 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:49:02.28 +77:50:31.5: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:49:02.28 +77:50:31.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5618 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:15:52.38 +79:29:16.3: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:18:43.80 +80:06:39.5: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:06:37.32 +79:05:11.1: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 06:18:48.17 +81:12:02.4: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:10:07.42 +80:02:43.8: 14.31 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:15:52.38 +79:29:16.3: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:18:43.80 +80:06:39.5: 14.56 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:52.38 +79:29:16.3: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.8636 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:43.80 +80:06:39.5: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9567 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:13:30.91 +79:12:37.9: 14.61 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:19:02.18 +72:57:02.4: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:06:37.32 +79:05:11.1: 14.68 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 06:18:48.17 +81:12:02.4: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:06:37.32 +79:05:11.1: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8401 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:48.17 +81:12:02.4: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8769 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:10:07.42 +80:02:43.8: 14.46 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:03:31.42 +79:22:17.5: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:10:07.42 +80:02:43.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.7750 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:13:30.91 +79:12:37.9: 14.49 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:30.91 +79:12:37.9: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9223 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:19:02.18 +72:57:02.4: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:19:02.18 +72:57:02.4: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3519 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:03:31.42 +79:22:17.5: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:31.42 +79:22:17.5: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0022 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:31:42.59 +75:36:10.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 05:18:16.58 +78:45:52.7: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-03-20_00-16-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 09:17:30.03 +72:53:51.6: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:31:42.59 +75:36:10.4: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:31:42.59 +75:36:10.4: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8338 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 05:18:16.58 +78:45:52.7: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-13_00-01-07_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0368.fits at 09:17:30.03 +72:53:51.6: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:16.58 +78:45:52.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3873 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:17:30.03 +72:53:51.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2668 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out78862.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78300_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78300_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.37    09:45:03.42 +73:08:35.4   9340 1772   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78307_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78307_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.84    05:16:08.14 +79:03:46.4   0328 5509   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.86    05:16:08.15 +79:03:46.9   0327 5508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78310_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78310_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    7.63    09:34:23.39 +71:05:17.2   9470 0427   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 09:34:23.38 +71:05:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78334_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78334_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    9.28    08:48:10.28 +71:55:26.1   7188 0157   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    9.28    08:48:10.22 +71:55:26.1   7186 0155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78339_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78339_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    9.62    06:41:19.67 +82:15:58.5   3071 6253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    9.66    06:41:19.51 +82:15:58.7   3070 6252   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78382_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78382_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    10.39    09:32:07.50 +72:01:47.1   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78396_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78396_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    10.57    09:34:08.51 +71:06:01.4   9457 0430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    10.72    09:34:08.51 +71:06:01.4   9455 0428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78410_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78410_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    10.69    09:31:55.83 +71:18:15.8   9303 0498   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    10.66    09:31:55.66 +71:18:15.2   9301 0496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78435_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78435_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    10.96    09:31:14.45 +70:57:41.5   9362 0293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.08    09:31:14.27 +70:57:42.0   9360 0291   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78477_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78477_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    11.26    09:33:03.55 +71:20:30.1   9344 0542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.28    09:33:03.44 +71:20:30.8   9342 0540   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78484_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78484_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.35    08:22:07.02 +74:54:31.8   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78505_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78505_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.60    08:12:08.47 +80:21:22.5   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78526_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78526_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.86    07:41:31.68 +81:59:33.3   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78556_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78556_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.90    08:28:15.02 +81:06:07.1   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78610_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78610_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.06    06:59:08.10 +79:35:37.5   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78634_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78634_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.12    07:44:33.27 +75:16:41.2   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78640_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78640_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.14    07:45:56.91 +74:19:51.0   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78648_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78648_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.36    05:15:10.60 +78:45:54.6   0193 5382   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78658_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78658_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.25    09:17:29.06 +76:46:59.7   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78690_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78690_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.48    10:16:12.04 +77:01:15.5   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78693_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78693_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.49    05:20:10.35 +80:28:22.2   0935 6128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.60    05:20:10.44 +80:28:23.5   0935 6127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78694_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78694_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.26    09:32:40.02 +71:13:21.1   9358 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.23    09:32:39.73 +71:13:21.4   9356 0466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78718_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78718_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.37    09:35:13.82 +71:13:06.2   9474 0519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.45    09:35:13.62 +71:13:06.0   9472 0517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78720_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78720_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.56    05:04:36.10 +79:22:41.2   0188 5867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.69    05:04:37.05 +79:22:42.3   0188 5867   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78721_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78721_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.43    09:29:10.72 +75:24:27.2   8133 2718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.42    09:29:11.01 +75:24:25.5   8132 2716   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78741_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78741_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.59    07:04:29.20 +75:13:35.1   2730 1963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 07:04:29.29 +75:13:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78754_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78754_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.44    09:33:27.90 +71:06:29.6   9424 0421   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.33    09:33:27.91 +71:06:29.4   9423 0419   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78758_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78758_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.60    06:52:43.07 +73:26:13.1   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78759_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78759_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.46    09:22:44.02 +71:14:08.4   8904 0280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.85    09:22:43.88 +71:14:07.0   8903 0278   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78764_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78764_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.65    05:20:02.84 +80:28:11.4   0932 6128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.39    05:20:03.37 +80:28:13.0   0931 6128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78786_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78786_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.67    09:39:38.36 +77:06:44.4   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78788_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78788_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.73    08:09:41.91 +81:42:14.0   4881 5729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 08:09:41.80 +81:42:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78790_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78790_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.62    09:41:10.51 +75:26:55.2   8537 2939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.62    09:41:10.49 +75:26:55.0   8535 2937   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78792_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78792_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.60    08:02:12.18 +74:41:54.4   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78805_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78805_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.74    05:31:00.14 +77:52:06.8   0277 4652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.64    05:31:00.01 +77:52:07.6   0276 4652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78862_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 Preparing report for the candidate 78862_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78865_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78865_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.68    09:17:03.20 +71:21:04.4   8616 0241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78871_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78871_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.75    09:21:35.29 +72:50:45.2   8469 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.78    09:21:35.15 +72:50:44.8   8467 1166   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78878_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78878_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.95    05:07:57.92 +79:12:42.7   0197 5728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.94    05:07:58.18 +79:12:41.7   0197 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78887_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78887_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.79    08:20:56.66 +75:54:20.7   5601 2298   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.77    08:20:57.05 +75:54:21.7   5600 2297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78889_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78889_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.84    09:18:24.89 +73:29:18.5   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78904_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78904_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.81    09:23:37.55 +71:13:09.4   8949 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.93    09:23:36.88 +71:13:07.4   8947 0285   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78922_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78922_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.02    09:36:27.58 +81:21:22.7   6788 6060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.82    09:36:27.57 +81:21:22.9   6787 6059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78932_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78932_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.87    06:53:12.76 +74:09:28.3   2151 1425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 06:53:12.72 +74:09:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78979_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78979_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.95    09:34:34.18 +71:40:51.4   9319 0761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.68    09:34:33.71 +71:40:48.5   9317 0758   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 78998_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 78998_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.23    08:46:50.88 +72:23:39.5   7055 0418   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 08:46:51.52 +72:23:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79004_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79004_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.21    08:13:39.93 +81:44:24.3   4964 5759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 08:13:40.74 +81:44:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79015_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79015_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.00    09:05:02.34 +71:37:18.6   8012 0204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.80    09:05:02.13 +71:37:17.1   8010 0201   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79016_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79016_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.07    09:07:33.17 +80:39:44.5   6318 5403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79026_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79026_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.03    09:33:45.61 +71:42:24.8   9277 0759   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.03    09:33:45.34 +71:42:24.3   9275 0757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79051_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79051_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.25    06:35:50.83 +80:33:21.9   2646 5298   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 06:35:51.11 +80:33:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79077_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79077_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.31    05:16:56.32 +78:44:20.8   0227 5338   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.62    05:16:55.76 +78:44:18.5   0225 5337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79080_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79080_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.31    09:11:00.63 +80:50:56.1   6360 5540   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.23    09:11:00.06 +80:50:57.5   6359 5538   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79162_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79162_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.27    09:36:32.99 +71:30:40.3   9452 0708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.26    09:36:32.71 +71:30:43.5   9450 0707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79172_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79172_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.26    09:30:52.37 +71:18:59.5   9252 0483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.26    09:30:51.45 +71:18:57.5   9250 0481   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79199_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79199_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.35    09:33:11.87 +71:53:36.9   9202 0851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.10    09:33:11.98 +71:53:33.8   9201 0848   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79234_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79234_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.56    09:49:02.35 +77:50:30.0   8088 4344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.56    09:49:02.22 +77:50:32.9   8086 4342   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79245_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79245_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.63    09:36:01.31 +78:57:45.9   7417 4755   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 09:36:01.44 +78:57:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79302_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79302_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.51    08:09:53.16 +74:20:28.8   5281 1312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79335_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79335_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    14.00    07:31:59.29 +74:06:26.2   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79359_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79359_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.40    06:23:29.05 +74:35:11.9   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79369_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79369_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.85    05:15:52.90 +79:29:15.1   0480 5718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.89    05:15:51.85 +79:29:17.4   0479 5718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79403_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79403_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.93    05:18:43.65 +80:06:40.5   0773 5974   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.99    05:18:43.95 +80:06:38.6   0772 5973   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79421_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79421_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.93    06:26:18.45 +71:20:28.3   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79422_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79422_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.83    08:00:20.28 +76:48:32.4   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79423_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79423_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.93    05:06:37.48 +79:05:11.8   0118 5694   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.77    05:06:37.17 +79:05:10.3   0117 5693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79427_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79427_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.92    06:18:48.25 +81:12:00.9   2394 5807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.84    06:18:48.09 +81:12:03.8   2393 5807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79446_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79446_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    14.11    05:28:24.35 +77:59:47.6   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79454_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79454_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.96    05:10:07.04 +80:02:42.7   0567 6083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.68    05:10:07.81 +80:02:44.8   0567 6083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79497_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79497_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.78    08:00:52.58 +74:13:12.2   4919 1213   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79504_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79504_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    14.09    05:13:30.99 +79:12:38.6   0323 5627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.81    05:13:30.83 +79:12:37.1   0322 5626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 79541_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 79541_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    14.26    07:22:25.31 +80:51:29.0   3795 5233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76821_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 76821_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.36    09:19:02.32 +72:57:02.6   8338 1185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.34    09:19:02.04 +72:57:02.1   8337 1182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76772_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 76772_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.96    05:03:31.55 +79:22:16.9   0162 5884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.06    05:03:31.28 +79:22:18.0   0161 5884   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 76760_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 76760_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.48    09:38:21.82 +74:12:41.3   8780 2219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 08122_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 08122_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    11.57    08:25:19.70 +81:21:59.4   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 61781_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 61781_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    9.45    07:30:29.96 +75:03:45.6   3714 1734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 07:30:29.98 +75:03:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39678_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 39678_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.87    09:31:42.95 +75:36:10.5   8171 2865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.80    09:31:42.22 +75:36:10.3   8169 2863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 39291_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 39291_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    10.73    06:25:56.77 +75:27:04.5   1340 2483   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits **** FOUND 06:25:56.79 +75:27:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 52816_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    12.28    09:17:30.19 +72:53:52.2   8287 1130   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    12.25    09:17:29.88 +72:53:51.0   8285 1127   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07497_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 The candidate 07497_fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.42824    2461209.92824    13.39    05:18:16.74 +78:45:52.6   0269 5326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-16-30_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0470.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.42870    2461209.92870    13.39    05:18:16.42 +78:45:52.8   0267 5325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_055233_TTUQ1b1x1_2202172_w5XjIRfc/fd_Cam-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_05-17-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0471.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 24s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7 ########### Completed Cam-04-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7 ################################################################################### 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 07:52:15.83 +82:35:17.7 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.92824272 -observatory V36 07:31:49.86 +22:18:07.7 Mercury (0.7mag) 08:33:11.22 +20:52:00.4 Venus (-4.0mag) 03:19:29.21 +17:52:36.6 Mars (1.3mag) 07:57:08.71 +21:08:43.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:52:02.24 +03:02:49.9 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:02:35.81 +20:32:15.8 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:38.64 +00:19:29.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:42.80 -23:08:34.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 09:04:01.43 +17:40:44.9 Moon (-9.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 18 06:35 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.92824272: 07:57:03.44 +21:09:00.7 Io (6.2mag) 07:57:02.08 +21:09:06.2 Europa (6.3mag) 07:57:24.11 +21:07:56.6 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:57:12.56 +21:08:37.5 Callisto (6.9mag) 07:56:49.71 +20:46:17.9 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:57:11.86 +21:08:32.5 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:56:32.36 +20:57:28.6 Elara (17.6mag) 07:59:49.51 +21:14:49.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:03:15.59 +21:11:16.4 Carme (18.9mag) 00:52:05.11 +03:03:16.5 Titan (8.6mag) 00:51:59.66 +03:02:44.8 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:52:20.46 +03:05:19.1 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:52:13.11 +03:03:06.4 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:52:31.69 +03:03:17.1 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 18 06:35 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.92824272: 17:27:44.70 -35:33:53.9 JWST 08:43:13.00 +09:59:17.6 Chandra 04:17:37.70 +54:55:19.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 18 06:35 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.92824272 -observatory V36 18:35:51.33 -33:21:01.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:03:38.40 -67:59:52.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:52:50.94 +32:06:25.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:10:40.12 +15:46:14.7 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 22:53:40.93 -39:21:10.1 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:09:46.75 +31:56:28.4 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:46:31.33 +27:00:40.2 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:37:23.51 +30:42:14.3 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:56:15.54 +04:22:21.2 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:21:27.09 +21:42:18.4 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:16:01.23 -11:03:20.2 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:09:33.23 +67:05:31.9 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:20:54.66 -07:44:01.9 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:17:05.20 +80:36:00.8 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:25:12.95 +64:41:06.0 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:02:29.13 +28:39:58.1 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:29:36.46 +14:18:59.2 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:05:09.87 +34:05:29.3 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:28:15.91 -15:07:09.6 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:15:22.26 +32:44:10.0 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:32:08.98 +52:07:34.8 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:56:08.07 -11:22:03.0 15.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:33:08.02 +23:09:19.8 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:01.37 +04:35:21.5 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:52:55.95 +77:04:56.2 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:17:28.74 +44:05:39.8 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:14:17.18 -00:28:18.8 16.6mag A/2026 E1 20:41:59.97 -09:39:41.5 8.2mag 10P/Tempel 11:04:49.36 -01:09:40.5 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:27:28.53 +26:58:35.0 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:21:47.92 +20:46:57.0 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:35:09.77 -05:47:00.8 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:16:42.78 +34:12:21.2 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:34:01.31 +18:24:58.6 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:42:12.55 +06:57:17.6 15.8mag 88P/Howell 05:27:29.89 +30:50:50.9 15.4mag 93P/Lovas 03:12:39.41 +29:07:39.6 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:15:10.32 +32:33:08.1 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:08:11.90 +10:17:04.7 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos 04:15:55.63 +19:52:40.7 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:53:50.47 +19:28:10.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 06:40:03.38 +17:15:09.5 15.9mag 141P/Machholz 06:43:26.95 +17:53:49.1 15.9mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:43:59.49 +17:11:06.1 12.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:04:38.97 -23:21:59.4 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 04:15:50.75 +27:39:49.1 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:33:39.52 +05:01:40.6 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 00:45:36.65 +04:22:27.9 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:44:54.72 -08:07:49.1 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR 07:57:38.46 +34:58:22.0 17.7mag 240P/NEAT 00:59:26.06 +01:59:31.1 16.1mag 260P/McNaught 04:32:39.68 +34:12:32.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:47:04.53 +01:35:15.3 17.9mag 320P/McNaught 15:11:08.57 +07:38:43.4 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:15:30.52 +20:27:29.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:16:38.64 +40:56:56.9 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 18 06:35 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 18 06:35 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 18 06:35 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:43:21.780 -19:01:27.20 AT 2026oui 2026-06-09.77 17.45 18:39:28.484 +40:26:01.95 AT 2026ouh 2026-06-09.96 20.28 17:09:25.583 +46:50:44.78 AT 2026oug 2026-05-24.04 20.17 22:18:12.988 -50:00:38.07 AT 2026ouf 2026-06-06.71 19.45 22:21:39.501 -53:11:49.91 AT 2026oue 2026-06-06.71 18.95 23:15:15.867 -42:43:46.15 AT 2026oud 2026-06-06.73 19.54 22:52:13.794 -53:03:24.16 AT 2026ouc 2026-06-06.74 19.28 23:09:28.921 -58:33:19.54 AT 2026oub 2026-06-06.75 18.88 00:22:14.997 -31:56:25.40 AT 2026oua 2026-06-06.79 19.42 00:27:47.533 -44:12:30.97 AT 2026otz 2026-06-06.80 19.35 01:16:28.303 -11:27:59.19 AT 2026oty 2026-06-06.79 19.15 13:38:30.343 -11:00:54.54 AT 2026otx 2026-04-16.52 20.06 13:27:19.671 -08:35:13.35 AT 2026otw 2026-06-07.40 20.36 12:24:14.411 -03:42:46.79 AT 2026otv 2026-06-07.40 20.17 11:40:32.768 -07:18:55.82 AT 2026otu 2026-06-07.37 20.18 12:27:47.187 +13:03:22.54 AT 2026ott 2026-05-19.03 20.15 12:22:38.942 +08:51:07.24 AT 2026ots 2026-05-19.02 20.44 09:46:20.889 +09:01:23.97 AT 2026otr 2026-05-18.96 20.1 22:34:44.197 +27:06:25.62 AT 2026otq 2026-06-09.56 18.841 00:15:02.869 -38:28:54.72 AT 2026otp 2026-05-22.42 20.11 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 18 06:35 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 87 C