## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78072922 22.02.2026 06:44:05.005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
First image: 2461093.78072922 22.02.2026 06:44:05.005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Last  image: 2461209.74226616 18.06.2026 05:48:41.796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6700
Objects passed selection criteria:  6689
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 6156.5
Average stars matched: 5939.25 (96.4712 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   112192 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Jun 18 01:03:43 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78072922 22.02.2026 06:44:05.005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
First image: 2461093.78072922 22.02.2026 06:44:05.005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Last  image: 2461209.74226616 18.06.2026 05:48:41.796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 56
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  33157
Objects passed selection criteria:  33087
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 30688.2
Average stars matched: 29376.5 (95.7256 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   133504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Jun 18 01:05:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-08-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-08-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 703766 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 703766 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits_preview.png'

UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits


renamed 'UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits_preview.png'

UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 483.7856
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.3741
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 997.7848
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 507.2850
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 998.1410
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 506.8587
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.06245
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-18T00:47:55.7578651' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T05:47:55.7578651' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61209.2416175581 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T05:48:05.6612994' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61209.2417321876 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     190.587595743609 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     54.0002575888061 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     43.5216666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     314.821666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      1.4505923241668 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-08'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 42 21'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29489 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29489 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 43.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                887.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                325.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             1.400112 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits :)

Spent 0.647479 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 25.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-18T00:48:41.7962605' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T05:48:41.7962605' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61209.2421504166 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T05:48:51.7000097' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61209.2422650461 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     190.587595782659 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     54.0002575822001 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     43.4080555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     314.821666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.45361858553319 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-08'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 42 21'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29489 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29489 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 11.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 43.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=                887.1 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 25.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                325.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             1.400112 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits :)

Spent 0.620157 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits



fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.74173330
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:26.401 +54:01:40.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66
Second-epoch image center 12:42:26.401 +54:01:40.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0225 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:25.912 +54:00:59.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66
Second-epoch image center 12:42:25.912 +54:00:59.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0114 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:42:26.401 +54:01:40.47
Second-epoch second image center 12:42:25.912 +54:00:59.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01155 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KBCmvZWUyI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UVUCzlKZsz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QZjvJPxxZW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MbY5uG0K3t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6316 to +59.4289 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6316 to 59.4289 deg
Loaded 5130 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6366 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.895950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.895950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6316 to +59.4289 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6316 to 59.4289 deg
Loaded 5130 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6366 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6336 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6315 to +59.4307 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6315 to 59.4307 deg
Loaded 5133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6336 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
 15.3 mag.  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
 15.3 mag.  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.3 (SNR )  12.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KBCmvZWUyI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, passed=6366
Got 6366 stars (including 5928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=229 n_q2=251 n_q3=253 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UVUCzlKZsz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, passed=6336
Got 6336 stars (including 5899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=228 n_q2=253 n_q3=247 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QZjvJPxxZW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, passed=6055
Got 6055 stars (including 5733 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6055 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6000 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6000 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6000 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=235 n_q2=259 n_q3=245 n_q4=229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.994
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MbY5uG0K3t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, passed=6007
Got 6007 stars (including 5691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6007 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=233 n_q2=258 n_q3=247 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.245
ref2=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.270
new1=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=0.994
new2=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.049
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.2575
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:17:30.44 +49:45:37.6:  11.00 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:17:30.44 +49:45:37.6:  11.01 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:30.44 +49:45:37.6: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2760 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20288_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20288_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    8.13    12:08:08.80 +55:27:52.8   7777 2328   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:08:08.85 +55:27:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20440_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20440_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    11.31    13:17:30.42 +49:45:37.5   1220 5351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    11.25    13:17:30.47 +49:45:37.8   1219 5344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20557_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 20557_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    12.18    11:57:35.99 +53:22:30.8   8809 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  11:57:35.98 +53:22:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:26.401 +54:01:40.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66
Second-epoch image center 12:42:26.401 +54:01:40.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0225 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.6'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:42:25.912 +54:00:59.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66
Second-epoch image center 12:42:25.912 +54:00:59.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0114 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:42:26.401 +54:01:40.47
Second-epoch second image center 12:42:25.912 +54:00:59.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01155 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8lViU6fXNc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UcQgEB4YGC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vSe90VjSGl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KsoV8fB3iX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 32060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.5911 to +59.4389 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.5911 to 59.4389 deg
Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3548 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3548 out of 32060 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.52

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.52

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 32060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.5911 to +59.4389 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.5911 to 59.4389 deg
Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3548 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3548 out of 32060 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 32020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0423 to 205.0230 deg, Dec +47.5909 to +59.4403 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0423 to 205.0230 deg, Dec 47.5909 to 59.4403 deg
Loaded 5177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3222 out of 3544 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3544 out of 32020 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 44 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
 15.4 mag.  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
 15.4 mag.  fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.4 (SNR )  14.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8lViU6fXNc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1385, passed=32036
Got 32036 stars (including 30591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32036 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=223 n_q2=243 n_q3=257 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UcQgEB4YGC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1380, passed=31995
Got 31995 stars (including 30556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31995 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31654 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=226 n_q2=243 n_q3=252 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vSe90VjSGl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=978, passed=29659
Got 29659 stars (including 28630 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29395 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=237 n_q2=264 n_q3=237 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.994
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KsoV8fB3iX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=983, passed=29878
Got 29878 stars (including 28842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29878 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29591 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=236 n_q2=257 n_q3=241 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.032
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:24:32.51 +49:09:51.3:  14.42 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:47:01.38 +51:47:24.8:  14.59 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:17:30.43 +49:45:37.5:  11.19 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:50:36.04 +56:41:18.8:  14.61 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:25:20.50 +56:49:22.3:  11.90 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:21:59.06 +56:04:09.9:  12.83 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:24:32.51 +49:09:51.3:  14.55 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:50:36.04 +56:41:18.8:  14.63 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:17:30.43 +49:45:37.5:  11.18 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:32.51 +49:09:51.3: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5652 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:50:36.04 +56:41:18.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7706 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:47:01.38 +51:47:24.8:  14.48 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:30.43 +49:45:37.5: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3567 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:21:59.06 +56:04:09.9:  12.87 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:47:01.38 +51:47:24.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6967 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:25:20.50 +56:49:22.3:  11.89 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:59.06 +56:04:09.9: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2981 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:25:20.50 +56:49:22.3: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1805 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:07:39.01 +57:39:30.7:  13.50 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:06:14.35 +51:42:27.2:  13.99 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:07:39.01 +57:39:30.7:  13.46 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:07:39.01 +57:39:30.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8075 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:44:01.75 +55:29:57.0:  14.33 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:44:20.97 +54:23:58.2:  14.54 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:11:04.13 +56:58:16.9:  14.50 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:53:28.99 +55:58:16.9:  15.05 +/- 0.29  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:04:03.34 +57:31:20.0:  14.65 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:16:24.66 +56:16:47.8:  14.92 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:06:14.35 +51:42:27.2:  13.94 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:06:14.35 +51:42:27.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2091 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:22:52.97 +53:22:16.1:  14.88 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:21:50.14 +58:43:44.3:  15.18 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:44:20.97 +54:23:58.2:  14.41 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:44:01.75 +55:29:57.0:  14.30 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:44:20.97 +54:23:58.2: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6027 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:11:04.13 +56:58:16.9:  14.46 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:44:01.75 +55:29:57.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3460 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:53:28.99 +55:58:16.9:  15.02 +/- 0.29  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.48 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:11:04.13 +56:58:16.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7633 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:04:03.34 +57:31:20.0:  14.66 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.04 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:53:28.99 +55:58:16.9: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.7419 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.65 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:04:03.34 +57:31:20.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7700 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:16:24.66 +56:16:47.8:  14.97 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:24.66 +56:16:47.8: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8074 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:50:20.93 +55:01:04.0:  14.56 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:22:52.97 +53:22:16.1:  14.75 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.81 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:22:52.97 +53:22:16.1: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8534 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:21:50.14 +58:43:44.3:  15.23 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.20 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:21:50.14 +58:43:44.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8866 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:34:20.82 +54:06:43.4:  15.38 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:50:20.93 +55:01:04.0:  14.63 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.60 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:50:20.93 +55:01:04.0: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7862 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:58:17.98 +55:45:44.0:  14.92 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:22:18.60 +53:17:58.1:  14.77 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:24:18.95 +53:50:36.2:  14.86 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 11:54:31.55 +51:27:02.0:  15.30 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:34:20.43 +54:56:20.0:  15.54 +/- 0.27  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:33:47.49 +57:07:13.6:  15.24 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:34:20.82 +54:06:43.4:  15.30 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.34 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:34:20.82 +54:06:43.4: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.6553 delta=0.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:27:59.17 +58:14:00.7:  14.93 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:24:18.95 +53:50:36.2:  14.85 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:22:18.60 +53:17:58.1:  15.07 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:58:17.98 +55:45:44.0:  15.10 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.86 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:24:18.95 +53:50:36.2: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8610 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 11:54:31.55 +51:27:02.0:  15.45 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.89 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.99 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:34:20.43 +54:56:20.0:  14.82 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:18.60 +53:17:58.1: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8542 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:58:17.98 +55:45:44.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8844 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:33:47.49 +57:07:13.6:  15.26 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.37 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:54:31.55 +51:27:02.0: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9018 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.25 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:34:20.43 +54:56:20.0: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9651 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:33:47.49 +57:07:13.6: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9991 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:36:52.27 +56:27:41.7:  14.91 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:22:20.22 +55:11:36.8:  15.22 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:27:59.17 +58:14:00.7:  15.10 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.00 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:27:59.17 +58:14:00.7: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8314 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:10:57.13 +52:39:22.2:  14.56 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:36:52.27 +56:27:41.7:  15.02 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.96 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:36:52.27 +56:27:41.7: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9414 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:22:20.22 +55:11:36.8:  15.32 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.27 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:20.22 +55:11:36.8: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9913 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:10:57.13 +52:39:22.2:  14.73 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.64 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:57.13 +52:39:22.2: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9113 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52188_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52188_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.97    12:50:35.92 +56:41:19.4   4217 1543   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.67    12:50:36.16 +56:41:18.1   4217 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52192_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52192_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.84    12:45:56.27 +49:31:03.5   4274 5881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:45:56.25 +49:31:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52193_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52193_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.37    13:13:22.51 +58:24:18.3   2521 0254   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  13:13:22.50 +58:24:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52195_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52195_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.60    12:47:01.45 +51:47:25.3   4278 4509   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.90    12:47:01.32 +51:47:24.2   4278 4503   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52196_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52196_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.49    12:24:32.58 +49:09:50.4   6372 6187   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.67    12:24:32.44 +49:09:52.2   6372 6180   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52198_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52198_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    13.28    13:21:58.99 +56:04:09.1   1562 1518   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.31    13:21:59.12 +56:04:10.6   1562 1511   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52355_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52355_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    11.36    13:17:30.43 +49:45:37.5   1220 5351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    11.36    13:17:30.43 +49:45:37.5   1219 5344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52392_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52392_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    11.61    12:15:42.36 +57:00:11.4   7099 1429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:15:42.36 +57:00:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52420_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    11.82    12:19:34.43 +49:00:00.4   6867 6279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:19:34.43 +49:00:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52487_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52487_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    12.21    13:25:20.48 +56:49:22.3   1379 1010   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    12.15    13:25:20.51 +56:49:22.3   1379 1002   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52718_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52718_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    12.99    12:11:05.04 +50:29:06.8   7670 5353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:11:04.94 +50:29:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52756_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.42    11:56:57.82 +49:29:53.6   9103 5866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:57.76 +49:29:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52779_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.30    11:56:55.75 +49:29:44.9   9106 5868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:55.75 +49:29:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52844_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52844_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.39    12:24:08.43 +51:35:49.3   6408 4704   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:24:08.44 +51:35:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52861_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.53    12:05:22.71 +50:21:11.4   8229 5406   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:05:22.74 +50:21:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52884_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52884_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.47    11:56:59.71 +49:29:56.7   9099 5866   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  11:56:59.85 +49:29:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 52978_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.59    12:55:32.29 +56:10:11.1   3776 1805   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:55:32.28 +56:10:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53035_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    13.76    13:07:38.95 +57:39:30.3   2903 0786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.86    13:07:39.06 +57:39:31.0   2903 0779   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53075_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    13.81    12:22:52.54 +53:20:12.2   6520 3654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:22:52.55 +53:20:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53226_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53226_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.14    13:06:14.37 +51:42:26.9   2489 4359   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.35    13:06:14.34 +51:42:27.5   2488 4352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53259_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53259_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.29    12:19:55.64 +53:32:43.3   6784 3526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:19:55.71 +53:32:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53361_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53361_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.32    12:44:01.64 +55:29:56.8   4710 2302   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.37    12:44:01.87 +55:29:57.2   4709 2295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53447_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.32    12:21:39.36 +53:49:54.5   6627 3355   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:21:39.30 +53:49:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53512_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53512_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.52    12:44:20.86 +54:23:58.3   4636 2961   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.72    12:44:21.08 +54:23:58.2   4636 2954   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53602_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.64    12:56:08.08 +54:06:51.2   3589 3031   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:56:07.94 +54:06:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53609_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53609_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.63    12:53:28.99 +55:58:17.1   3936 1950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.92    12:53:28.98 +55:58:16.7   3936 1943   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53679_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53679_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.71    13:11:04.17 +56:58:17.4   2561 1152   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.84    13:11:04.10 +56:58:16.4   2561 1145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53712_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53712_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.76    13:04:03.34 +57:31:19.3   3180 0912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.79    13:04:03.35 +57:31:20.6   3179 0904   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53715_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53715_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.78    13:16:24.63 +56:16:47.5   2050 1485   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.85    13:16:24.69 +56:16:48.2   2049 1478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53731_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53731_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.79    12:22:52.96 +53:22:15.6   6520 3641   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.95    12:22:52.98 +53:22:16.6   6520 3634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53738_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53738_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.78    12:21:50.00 +58:43:42.0   6585 0402   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    15.09    12:21:50.29 +58:43:46.6   6585 0394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53782_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53782_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.82    12:50:20.94 +55:01:03.7   4146 2548   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.76    12:50:20.92 +55:01:04.2   4146 2541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53785_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53785_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.78    13:34:20.82 +54:06:43.7   0239 2432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.58    13:34:20.81 +54:06:43.1   0238 2425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53833_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53833_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.85    13:22:18.63 +53:17:57.4   1194 3155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.86    13:22:18.56 +53:17:58.8   1193 3148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53842_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53842_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.87    13:24:18.86 +53:50:35.9   1084 2796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.85    13:24:19.04 +53:50:36.5   1083 2788   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53848_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53848_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.89    12:58:17.97 +55:45:44.0   3517 2029   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.88    12:58:17.99 +55:45:44.0   3517 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53857_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53857_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.90    13:34:20.45 +54:56:19.9   0363 1944   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    15.06    13:34:20.41 +54:56:20.1   0362 1937   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53868_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53868_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.92    11:54:31.56 +51:27:02.9   9216 4663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.89    11:54:31.53 +51:27:01.0   9216 4657   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53927_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53927_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    15.01    13:33:47.46 +57:07:13.2   0732 0667   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.99    13:33:47.51 +57:07:13.9   0732 0660   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53928_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53928_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.88    13:27:59.19 +58:14:01.2   1353 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.81    13:27:59.14 +58:14:00.1   1353 0114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53940_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53940_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.67    12:50:44.18 +50:21:16.9   3853 5337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

**** FOUND  12:50:44.23 +50:21:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53942_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53942_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.93    13:36:52.15 +56:27:42.0   0381 0990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.95    13:36:52.40 +56:27:41.4   0380 0983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53960_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53960_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    14.99    13:22:20.03 +55:11:35.9   1425 2031   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.99    13:22:20.41 +55:11:37.6   1425 2024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53969_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 53969_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 18.24173    2461209.74173    15.01    13:10:57.12 +52:39:21.6   2145 3726   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-47-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 18.24227    2461209.74227    14.84    13:10:57.14 +52:39:22.8   2145 3719   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_010035_TTUQ1b1x1_3037398_WmNhbzRL/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-48-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.74173330 -observatory V36
07:31:11.74 +22:21:41.3 Mercury (0.7mag)
08:32:17.14 +20:55:18.0 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:18:56.24 +17:50:23.7 Mars (1.3mag)
07:56:58.92 +21:09:09.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:59.59 +03:02:36.3 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:02:33.23 +20:32:08.6 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:38.18 +00:19:26.8 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:43.59 -23:08:29.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
08:50:13.22 +18:46:41.9 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 18 01:03 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.74173330:
07:56:54.30 +21:09:23.9 Io (6.2mag)
07:56:50.44 +21:09:38.1 Europa (6.3mag)
07:57:12.67 +21:08:29.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:57:00.73 +21:09:10.4 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:56:40.56 +20:46:42.3 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:57:02.75 +21:08:57.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:56:23.51 +20:57:57.3 Elara (17.6mag)
07:59:39.20 +21:15:21.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:03:06.34 +21:11:41.8 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:03.28 +03:03:02.0 Titan (8.6mag)
00:51:56.10 +03:02:34.0 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:18.22 +03:05:06.0 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:11.04 +03:02:51.3 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:29.30 +03:03:05.1 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 18 01:03 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.74173330:
17:28:36.02 -35:36:33.3 JWST
20:49:26.55 -20:10:02.1 Chandra
19:32:22.40 +06:31:36.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 18 01:03 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.74173330 -observatory V36
18:36:00.51 -33:20:19.9 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:03:27.09 -67:59:53.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:52:46.74 +32:06:16.2 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:10:44.56 +15:45:53.5 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
22:51:49.17 -39:38:20.6 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:50.57 +31:56:08.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:46:17.68 +27:00:39.2 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:37:14.73 +30:42:40.9 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:56:08.99 +04:21:55.6 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:21:34.64 +21:42:17.9 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:16:04.56 -11:03:15.2 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:09:40.40 +67:04:58.7 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:21:22.62 -07:42:51.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:02.70 +80:38:43.0 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:24:55.91 +64:40:39.4 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:02:12.69 +28:39:08.8 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:29:44.49 +14:18:14.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:05:19.88 +34:02:22.3 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:28:04.68 -15:07:59.6 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:15:11.91 +32:46:03.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:09.72 +52:08:19.2 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:55:56.78 -11:21:27.2 15.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:32:57.46 +23:09:35.6 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:00.38 +04:35:32.7 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:53:22.61 +77:03:07.9 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:17:11.39 +44:04:56.9 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:14:12.94 -00:31:31.0 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:41:41.03 -09:38:02.6 8.2mag 10P/Tempel
11:04:45.79 -01:09:24.7 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:27:11.34 +26:57:09.7 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:21:23.92 +20:50:17.7 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:35:01.42 -05:47:33.7 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:16:06.14 +34:11:47.1 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:33:33.93 +18:23:46.5 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:41:49.92 +06:55:07.1 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:26:53.96 +30:50:29.4 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:12:05.98 +29:06:09.7 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:14:42.99 +32:33:47.8 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:07:51.78 +10:21:48.8 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:15:37.08 +19:52:02.9 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:53:28.28 +19:27:50.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:39:19.87 +17:16:55.5 15.9mag 141P/Machholz
06:42:42.35 +17:53:53.8 15.9mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:43:06.63 +17:10:24.5 12.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:04:31.55 -23:23:20.1 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:15:12.34 +27:35:52.6 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:33:46.19 +04:57:43.2 16.3mag 169P/NEAT
00:45:07.21 +04:20:29.3 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:45:02.21 -08:08:01.9 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
07:57:13.34 +34:59:02.3 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
00:58:56.17 +01:54:31.2 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:32:07.74 +34:10:47.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:46:14.56 +01:24:52.0 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:11:12.52 +07:39:20.0 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:15:21.06 +20:27:50.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:16:20.31 +40:57:47.3 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 18 01:03 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 18 01:03 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 18 01:03 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
12:27:47.187 +13:03:22.54  AT 2026ott  2026-05-19.03 20.15
12:22:38.942 +08:51:07.24  AT 2026ots  2026-05-19.02 20.44
09:46:20.889 +09:01:23.97  AT 2026otr  2026-05-18.96 20.1
22:34:44.197 +27:06:25.62  AT 2026otq  2026-06-09.56 18.841
00:15:02.869 -38:28:54.72  AT 2026otp  2026-05-22.42 20.11
23:31:16.630 -35:03:18.75  AT 2026oto  2026-05-04.41 19.11
12:25:14.599 +12:58:16.51  AT 2026otn  2026-05-19.03 20.12
10:04:42.371 +12:40:27.29  AT 2026otm  2026-05-04.99 20.5
18:56:24.084 -24:59:43.12  AT 2026otl  2026-06-07.38 18.4151
14:25:58.906 -19:09:39.58  AT 2026otk  2026-06-09.32 19.3712
16:32:34.784 -13:42:09.08  AT 2026otj  2026-05-22.23 22.76
01:51:40.895 +18:21:06.04  AT 2026oti  2026-06-06.48 18.6484
00:00:06.428 +20:53:35.17  AT 2026oth  2026-06-09.47 20.2357
00:28:14.152 +32:16:04.97  AT 2026otg  2026-06-06.47 20.084
19:34:17.664 -12:11:29.15  AT 2026otf  2026-06-05.42 19.9617
13:53:56.659 +06:57:27.66  AT 2026ote  2026-06-05.32 20.3259
20:18:10.019 +06:04:43.69  AT 2026otd  2026-06-05.43 20.4063
22:17:48.869 +03:46:37.28  AT 2026otc  2026-06-05.45 20.2117
13:46:37.393 +66:54:16.51  AT 2026otb  2026-06-06.37 19.239
10:21:58.883 +19:58:08.57  AT 2026ota  2026-06-09.26 18.926
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 18 01:03 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Jun 18 01:03:20 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 34s (0.57 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 60s (1.00 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 105s (1.75 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 23s (0.38 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 66s (1.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 4s (0.07 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 96s (1.60 min)
FIELD_UMa-08-Q1b1x1: 217s (3.62 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 219s (3.65 min)
Finished: Thu Jun 18 01:06:59 CDT 2026