This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2116 2461209.7116 14.54 12:14:34.44 +26:00:41.5
218.56609 81.68401 galactic Com Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.350 Ornamenta -0 0 0 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:14:34.44 +26:00:41.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:14:34.44 +26:00:41.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.2116* 12 14 34.44 +26 00 41.5 14.5 U Com 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.7116,14.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.2116 14.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.2116 2461209.7116 13.22 12:13:46.95 +30:59:07.5
185.58058 80.91655 galactic Com Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" TU Com
Type: RRAB/BL
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.901 CV Y 0.850 CV 2453471.15990 0.461866500000 A8-F4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:13:46.95 +30:59:07.5: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:13:46.95 +30:59:07.5: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.2116* 12 13 46.95 +30 59 07.5 13.2 U Com 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TU Com,2461209.7116,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TU Com 20260618.2116 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.72571008 11.05.2026 05:24:51.351 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
First image: 2461171.72571008 11.05.2026 05:24:51.351 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Last image: 2461209.71187264 18.06.2026 05:04:55.796 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5543
Objects passed selection criteria: 5541
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5253
Average stars matched: 5116.75 (97.4062 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111412 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 18 00:30:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461171.72571008 11.05.2026 05:24:51.351 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
First image: 2461171.72571008 11.05.2026 05:24:51.351 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Last image: 2461209.71187264 18.06.2026 05:04:55.796 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 67
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25358
Objects passed selection criteria: 25297
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24022.2
Average stars matched: 23330.8 (97.1214 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 128100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Jun 18 00:32:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.71127334
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.226 +30:00:20.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:20.672 +30:01:50.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.226 +30:00:20.78
Second-epoch image center 12:00:20.672 +30:01:50.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0882 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:19.459 +30:02:29.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.226 +30:00:20.78
Second-epoch image center 12:00:19.459 +30:02:29.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0878 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:20.672 +30:01:50.49
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:19.459 +30:02:29.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01166 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jdmF724nbA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sAA9MzWRND
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Vb7r1TiUsN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zcaXwZDDUP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5408 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.4632 to 189.4636 deg, Dec +24.5419 to +35.2661 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.4632 to 189.4636 deg, Dec 24.5419 to 35.2661 deg
Loaded 3742 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2840 out of 2911 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2911 out of 5408 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.726850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.726850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5408 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.4632 to 189.4636 deg, Dec +24.5419 to +35.2661 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.4632 to 189.4636 deg, Dec 24.5419 to 35.2661 deg
Loaded 3742 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2840 out of 2911 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2911 out of 5408 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5145 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.4635 to 189.4637 deg, Dec +24.5258 to +35.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.4635 to 189.4637 deg, Dec 24.5258 to 35.2660 deg
Loaded 3749 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2846 out of 2906 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2906 out of 5145 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.4 pix UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
3.2 pix fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
3.2 pix fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.2 mag. UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jdmF724nbA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=334, passed=5408
Got 5408 stars (including 5067 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=240 n_q2=241 n_q3=219 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sAA9MzWRND (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=316, passed=5145
Got 5145 stars (including 4823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5145 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5112 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5110 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=239 n_q2=239 n_q3=225 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.151
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Vb7r1TiUsN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, passed=5295
Got 5295 stars (including 5012 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5273 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5272 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.233 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=241 n_q2=236 n_q3=240 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.128
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zcaXwZDDUP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=267, passed=5276
Got 5276 stars (including 5003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5276 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=241 n_q2=237 n_q3=238 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.152
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits sigma_overall=0.400 worst_q_ratio=1.241
ref2=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.151
new1=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.128
new2=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.152
reference average sigma_overall=0.3975 worst_q_ratio=1.196
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:01:17.01 +28:27:59.0: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:06:11.00 +30:05:14.9: 12.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:59:47.72 +29:59:57.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:06:23.39 +31:32:42.8: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:17:00.39 +27:45:08.6: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:19:14.63 +27:55:50.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:58:01.18 +29:46:08.9: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:06:23.39 +31:32:42.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:06:11.00 +30:05:14.9: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:19:14.63 +27:55:50.5: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:59:47.72 +29:59:57.3: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:01:17.01 +28:27:59.0: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:17:00.39 +27:45:08.6: 11.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:58:01.18 +29:46:08.9: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:23.39 +31:32:42.8: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3845 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:11.00 +30:05:14.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4341 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:19:14.63 +27:55:50.5: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4641 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:59:47.72 +29:59:57.3: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4263 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:01:17.01 +28:27:59.0: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4516 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:00.39 +27:45:08.6: ref_mag=11.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5949 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:58:01.18 +29:46:08.9: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4440 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20224_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20224_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20295_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20295_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20303_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20303_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:27:18.80 +27:01:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20305_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20305_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20306_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20306_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20307_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20307_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20308_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20308_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20311_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 20311_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:57.226 +30:00:20.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:20.672 +30:01:50.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.226 +30:00:20.78
Second-epoch image center 12:00:20.672 +30:01:50.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0882 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:19.459 +30:02:29.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:57.226 +30:00:20.78
Second-epoch image center 12:00:19.459 +30:02:29.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0878 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:20.672 +30:01:50.49
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:19.459 +30:02:29.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01166 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yVmJALP0vG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i1BQGlcbht
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YGi64pQbDV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ETBzqo7wf0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits and wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26491 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.4632 to 189.4882 deg, Dec +24.5296 to +35.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.4632 to 189.4882 deg, Dec 24.5296 to 35.2698 deg
Loaded 3754 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2750 out of 2939 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2939 out of 26491 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.615250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.615250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26491 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.4632 to 189.4882 deg, Dec +24.5296 to +35.2698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.4632 to 189.4882 deg, Dec 24.5296 to 35.2698 deg
Loaded 3754 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2750 out of 2939 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2939 out of 26491 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 25039 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 170.4635 to 189.5181 deg, Dec +24.5217 to +35.2660 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 170.4635 to 189.5181 deg, Dec 24.5217 to 35.2660 deg
Loaded 3757 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2766 out of 2934 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2934 out of 25039 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.2 pix UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
3.0 pix fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
3.0 pix fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
2.2 pix wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
15.1 mag. fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yVmJALP0vG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1107, passed=26473
Got 26473 stars (including 25324 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26348 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.460 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.485 n_q1=244 n_q2=249 n_q3=213 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.i1BQGlcbht (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1055, passed=25021
Got 25021 stars (including 23939 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25021 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 572 to 628 (Dec 24.5 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=245 n_q2=243 n_q3=219 n_q4=267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits -region wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YGi64pQbDV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=774, passed=22616
Got 22616 stars (including 21815 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22616 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.263 n_q1=242 n_q2=237 n_q3=236 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ETBzqo7wf0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=852, passed=22712
Got 22712 stars (including 21825 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 629 (Dec 24.1 to 35.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.216 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=243 n_q2=237 n_q3=239 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0144.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_002830_TTUQ1b1x1_253380_3ecQnutt/wcs_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-14-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:46:34.46 +33:06:23.4: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:49:18.83 +26:07:18.4: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:25:25.31 +34:05:17.9: 14.67 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:26:00.45 +28:44:55.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:27:16.58 +34:07:15.6: 14.59 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:32:18.34 +25:57:59.8: 14.73 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:26:39.60 +28:06:56.8: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:35:09.77 +34:52:31.7: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:24:30.35 +34:00:16.7: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:26:00.45 +28:44:55.7: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:49:18.83 +26:07:18.4: 13.90 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:25:25.31 +34:05:17.9: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:46:34.46 +33:06:23.4: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:49:18.83 +26:07:18.4: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9041 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:00.45 +28:44:55.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3747 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:25.31 +34:05:17.9: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1261 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:46:34.46 +33:06:23.4: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2431 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:24:30.35 +34:00:16.7: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:26:39.60 +28:06:56.8: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:27:16.58 +34:07:15.6: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:35:09.77 +34:52:31.7: 14.70 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:32:18.34 +25:57:59.8: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:39.60 +28:06:56.8: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3287 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:24:30.35 +34:00:16.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2327 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:16.58 +34:07:15.6: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1525 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:09.77 +34:52:31.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2407 delta=0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:18.34 +25:57:59.8: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3181 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:27:53.59 +34:38:00.4: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:26:11.61 +26:47:25.9: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:28:47.89 +26:32:05.4: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:28:33.16 +26:05:40.7: 14.90 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:25:01.84 +29:41:40.6: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:27:53.59 +34:38:00.4: 14.61 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:53.59 +34:38:00.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1883 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:14:34.44 +26:00:41.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:27:57.66 +33:58:36.3: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:28:33.16 +26:05:40.7: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:28:26.20 +29:47:37.2: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:28:47.89 +26:32:05.4: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:26:11.61 +26:47:25.9: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:25:01.84 +29:41:40.6: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:33.16 +26:05:40.7: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3157 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:47.89 +26:32:05.4: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3628 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:11.61 +26:47:25.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2802 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:01.84 +29:41:40.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3440 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:30:53.42 +34:52:27.7: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:26:02.25 +33:31:36.3: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:27:57.66 +33:58:36.3: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:14:34.44 +26:00:41.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:57.66 +33:58:36.3: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4414 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:28:26.20 +29:47:37.2: 15.20 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:26.20 +29:47:37.2: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7064 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:25:59.40 +31:54:05.7: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:26:02.25 +33:31:36.3: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:30:53.42 +34:52:27.7: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:02.25 +33:31:36.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5463 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:30:53.42 +34:52:27.7: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2843 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:29:45.30 +29:36:16.0: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:24:05.38 +33:54:21.3: 15.28 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:28:24.62 +26:51:14.1: 15.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:29:57.07 +27:34:07.7: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:25:59.40 +31:54:05.7: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:59.40 +31:54:05.7: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5356 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:29:45.30 +29:36:16.0: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:24:05.38 +33:54:21.3: 14.87 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:29:57.07 +27:34:07.7: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.86 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:28:49.54 +25:40:10.8: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:33:15.23 +30:16:39.6: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:05.38 +33:54:21.3: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7534 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:45.30 +29:36:16.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6915 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:29:57.07 +27:34:07.7: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7145 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:28:24.62 +26:51:14.1: 15.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.15 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:28:24.62 +26:51:14.1: ref_mag=15.15 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8128 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:27:52.37 +32:02:07.9: 15.35 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:33:15.23 +30:16:39.6: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:33:15.23 +30:16:39.6: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8651 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:28:49.54 +25:40:10.8: 14.85 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:49.54 +25:40:10.8: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4897 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:30:46.18 +29:12:15.3: 14.91 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:23:55.97 +27:47:24.4: 14.86 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:27:52.37 +32:02:07.9: 15.42 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:27:52.37 +32:02:07.9: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8067 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:32:24.79 +24:45:31.3: 15.30 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:46:57.23 +32:39:01.6: 15.53 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:32:07.38 +24:45:04.4: 15.23 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:30:50.92 +31:04:08.5: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:30:46.18 +29:12:15.3: 15.39 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:46.18 +29:12:15.3: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8826 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:23:55.97 +27:47:24.4: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:55.97 +27:47:24.4: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8355 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:46:57.23 +32:39:01.6: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:32:24.79 +24:45:31.3: 15.37 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.38 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:33:48.33 +25:12:40.0: 15.06 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:46:57.23 +32:39:01.6: ref_mag=15.38 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8047 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:32:07.38 +24:45:04.4: 15.02 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:24.79 +24:45:31.3: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.8243 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:30:50.92 +31:04:08.5: 15.57 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:07.38 +24:45:04.4: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7316 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:35:21.73 +34:14:29.5: 15.10 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:50.92 +31:04:08.5: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7457 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:33:48.33 +25:12:40.0: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:35:21.73 +34:14:29.5: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:48.33 +25:12:40.0: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6265 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:35:21.73 +34:14:29.5: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7930 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:30:52.40 +32:51:54.8: 15.39 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:42:41.44 +34:42:19.9: 15.27 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:25:55.77 +27:18:11.1: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 11:28:20.47 +30:49:38.0: 14.78 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-11_00-24-51_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0206.fits at 12:13:46.95 +30:59:07.5: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:30:52.40 +32:51:54.8: 15.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:30:52.40 +32:51:54.8: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9089 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:42:41.44 +34:42:19.9: 14.86 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:42:41.44 +34:42:19.9: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8590 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:28:20.47 +30:49:38.0: 14.84 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 11:25:55.77 +27:18:11.1: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:28:20.47 +30:49:38.0: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8266 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:55.77 +27:18:11.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8837 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-05-18_00-11-30_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_1526.fits at 12:13:46.95 +30:59:07.5: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 12:13:46.95 +30:59:07.5: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2246 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10715.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31980.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31295_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31295_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31297_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31297_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31299_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31299_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:00.09 +34:03:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31411_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31411_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:22:31.68 +26:38:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31640_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31640_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:37.11 +27:04:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31645_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31645_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31655_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31655_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:50.64 +26:45:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31679_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31679_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:10:30.82 +29:05:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31820_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31820_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:32:05.68 +30:14:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31859_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31859_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31871_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31871_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31874_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31874_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31891_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31891_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31892_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31892_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31893_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31893_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:25.38 +25:29:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31912_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31912_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31915_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31915_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:25:32.76 +26:11:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31926_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31926_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31931_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31931_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31935_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31935_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31954_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31954_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31956_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31956_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31960_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 31960_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:26.89 +25:20:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31980_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 31980_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32010_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32010_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32022_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32022_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:26:10.17 +30:07:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32025_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32025_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32051_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32051_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32055_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32055_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32067_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32067_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32069_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32069_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32070_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32070_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32080_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32080_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32085_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32085_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32086_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32086_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32091_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32091_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32094_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32094_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32098_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32098_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:41.47 +32:32:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32101_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32101_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32103_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32103_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32112_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32112_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32113_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32113_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32145_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32145_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32157_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32157_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32162_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32162_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32167_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32167_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32181_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32181_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:12.00 +26:06:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32198_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32198_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:49.30 +26:20:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32208_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32208_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32211_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32211_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32221_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32221_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32231_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32231_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:27:44.74 +27:52:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32242_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 32242_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30218_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145
The candidate 30218_fd_UMa-14-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-04-55_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0145 did not pass the final checks