######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 724512 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 724512 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1135.9168
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 554.6235
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1135.6737
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 555.6019
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.13069
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-18T00:11:49.8992471' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T05:11:49.8992471' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.2165497569 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T05:11:59.8014470' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.2166643636 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997012248705 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9996815310564 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.8152777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 337.125833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.06817304228079 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29470 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29470 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 33.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits :)
Spent 0.641942 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-18T00:12:37.7851824' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T05:12:37.7851824' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.2171039931 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T05:12:47.6526324' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.2172181946 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.997012295496 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9996815544158 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.7502777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 337.152777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.07241208221617 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29470 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29470 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 33.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits :)
Spent 0.536788 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.71666550
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:46.818 +70:02:05.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:46.818 +70:02:05.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0602 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:44.193 +70:02:45.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:44.193 +70:02:45.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:46.818 +70:02:05.82
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:44.193 +70:02:45.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01153 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1TTwEGe3ws
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.spQsNYtoxY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r0PNhJbxvj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sfw5P8sgz5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5136 out of 5418 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5418 out of 8894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
3.1 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
3.1 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
14.8 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1TTwEGe3ws (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, passed=8779
Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.326 n_q1=198 n_q2=294 n_q3=212 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.spQsNYtoxY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, passed=8894
Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=199 n_q2=283 n_q3=224 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.r0PNhJbxvj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=8136
Got 8136 stars (including 7749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8136 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8066 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=220 n_q2=292 n_q3=227 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sfw5P8sgz5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, passed=8150
Got 8150 stars (including 7751 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8150 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8073 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=221 n_q2=287 n_q3=228 n_q4=231 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.330
ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.241
new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.260
reference average sigma_overall=0.3945 worst_q_ratio=1.302
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:53:30.50 +71:24:01.8: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:41:53.94 +69:06:36.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:46:46.58 +70:33:08.0: 12.24 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:40:50.05 +69:50:55.4: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:51:57.04 +67:08:57.2: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:56:35.51 +69:55:42.3: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:57:08.78 +69:58:07.4: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:36:04.17 +70:18:12.9: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:10:28.50 +70:03:57.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:49:40.92 +69:12:34.1: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:10:28.50 +70:03:57.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:41:53.94 +69:06:36.1: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:40:50.05 +69:50:55.4: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:53:30.50 +71:24:01.8: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:51:57.04 +67:08:57.2: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:57:08.78 +69:58:07.4: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:49:40.92 +69:12:34.1: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:56:35.51 +69:55:42.3: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:46:46.58 +70:33:08.0: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:28.50 +70:03:57.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2716 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:50.05 +69:50:55.4: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2333 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:53.94 +69:06:36.1: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3211 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:30.50 +71:24:01.8: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2588 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:51:57.04 +67:08:57.2: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3090 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:08.78 +69:58:07.4: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2777 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:49:40.92 +69:12:34.1: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3185 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:56:35.51 +69:55:42.3: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3750 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:46:46.58 +70:33:08.0: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1596 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:36:04.17 +70:18:12.9: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:36:04.17 +70:18:12.9: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2836 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:54:31.81 +69:01:25.5: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:11:02.22 +69:45:36.8: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:53:21.39 +71:15:44.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:13:44.76 +70:34:24.7: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:54:37.27 +68:13:19.1: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:47:20.43 +71:34:23.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:11:02.22 +69:45:36.8: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:54:31.81 +69:01:25.5: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:02.22 +69:45:36.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3769 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:31.81 +69:01:25.5: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4012 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:53:21.39 +71:15:44.0: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:13:44.76 +70:34:24.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:47:20.43 +71:34:23.3: 12.41 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:21.39 +71:15:44.0: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3516 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:44.76 +70:34:24.7: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3586 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:54:37.27 +68:13:19.1: 12.42 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:20.43 +71:34:23.3: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3607 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:37.27 +68:13:19.1: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3565 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20781_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20781_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.14 | 09:46:46.54 +70:33:08.2 | 4309 2844 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.18 | 09:46:46.63 +70:33:07.8 | 4306 2851 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20802_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20802_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.23 | 09:40:50.00 +69:50:55.4 | 4573 3293 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.23 | 09:40:50.10 +69:50:55.3 | 4570 3299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20805_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20805_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.26 | 09:53:30.53 +71:24:02.1 | 4039 2299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.26 | 09:53:30.47 +71:24:01.5 | 4037 2306 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20808_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20808_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.27 | 09:57:08.79 +69:58:07.3 | 3743 3129 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.29 | 09:57:08.78 +69:58:07.5 | 3740 3135 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20809_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20809_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.28 | 10:51:57.06 +67:08:57.3 | 0374 4011 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.35 | 10:51:57.02 +67:08:57.2 | 0371 4017 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20812_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20812_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.28 | 10:10:28.50 +70:03:57.0 | 3076 2955 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.27 | 10:10:28.51 +70:03:56.9 | 3074 2961 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20815_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20815_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.30 | 09:49:40.90 +69:12:34.1 | 4073 3632 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.34 | 09:49:40.95 +69:12:34.0 | 4070 3638 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20817_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20817_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.31 | 09:41:53.86 +69:06:36.4 | 4482 3731 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.33 | 09:41:54.02 +69:06:35.9 | 4479 3738 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20823_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20823_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.32 | 09:36:04.19 +70:18:12.9 | 4835 3036 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.25 | 09:36:04.16 +70:18:12.9 | 4832 3042 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20828_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20828_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.34 | 09:56:35.50 +69:55:42.3 | 3768 3157 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.41 | 09:56:35.51 +69:55:42.3 | 3765 3163 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20831_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20831_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.36 | 10:13:44.76 +70:34:24.6 | 2976 2622 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.36 | 10:13:44.76 +70:34:24.7 | 2973 2628 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20832_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20832_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.35 | 09:53:21.39 +71:15:43.8 | 4036 2383 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.35 | 09:53:21.39 +71:15:44.2 | 4033 2389 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20834_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20834_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.36 | 09:47:20.32 +71:34:23.0 | 4344 2230 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.36 | 09:47:20.53 +71:34:23.5 | 4341 2236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20836_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20836_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.38 | 10:11:02.24 +69:45:36.9 | 3011 3130 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.38 | 10:11:02.21 +69:45:36.7 | 3009 3136 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20837_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20837_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.36 | 09:54:37.28 +68:13:19.0 | 3733 4190 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.35 | 09:54:37.27 +68:13:19.3 | 3730 4196 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20838_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 20838_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 12.38 | 09:54:31.85 +69:01:25.7 | 3801 3711 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 12.42 | 09:54:31.77 +69:01:25.4 | 3799 3718 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 01412_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 9.91 | 08:04:00.03 +73:24:29.6 | 8871 0627 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 08:04:00.05 +73:24:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 01377_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 9.57 | 10:55:40.08 +71:52:07.9 | 1244 1277 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:40.12 +71:52:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 04047_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 7.28 | 10:44:37.63 +68:46:32.8 | 1111 3232 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:44:37.64 +68:46:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:46.818 +70:02:05.82 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:46.818 +70:02:05.82
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0602 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:44.193 +70:02:45.10 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:36:44.193 +70:02:45.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0670 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:36:46.818 +70:02:05.82
Second-epoch second image center 09:36:44.193 +70:02:45.10
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01153 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pKYgpfiPNr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g2OIKPkyQl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gQP8tJEtDl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oGDG6oN5xh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec +62.8134 to +75.4919 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec 62.8134 to 75.4919 deg
Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4857 out of 5495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5495 out of 51887 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 17 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pKYgpfiPNr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, passed=51519
Got 51519 stars (including 48800 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51060 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51061 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.539 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=207 n_q2=283 n_q3=214 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g2OIKPkyQl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, passed=51863
Got 51863 stars (including 49079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51366 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=214 n_q2=275 n_q3=217 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.189
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gQP8tJEtDl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1514, passed=37588
Got 37588 stars (including 36018 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37588 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37242 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=225 n_q2=275 n_q3=235 n_q4=235 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oGDG6oN5xh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1463, passed=37329
Got 37329 stars (including 35824 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37329 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37004 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=230 n_q2=276 n_q3=233 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.168
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:46:31.73 +65:55:15.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:46:31.73 +65:55:15.0: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:46:31.73 +65:55:15.0: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9885 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65483_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65483_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 10.96 | 10:01:20.74 +74:13:25.1 | 3936 0567 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:01:20.73 +74:13:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65938_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 65938_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 13.07 | 08:31:20.27 +66:19:28.0 | 8612 5153 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 08:31:20.29 +66:19:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66092_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66092_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 13.25 | 08:12:30.59 +68:27:41.5 | 9368 3627 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 08:12:30.53 +68:27:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66173_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66173_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 13.41 | 08:26:07.86 +70:06:51.6 | 8395 2843 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 08:26:07.95 +70:06:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66198_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66198_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 13.68 | 10:47:52.47 +65:28:26.1 | 0243 5062 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:47:52.57 +65:28:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66329_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66329_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 13.89 | 10:07:01.39 +66:17:27.3 | 2830 5236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:07:01.33 +66:17:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66495_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66495_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 13.87 | 09:06:08.61 +68:26:44.8 | 6423 4152 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 09:06:08.48 +68:26:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66512_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66512_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 14.24 | 10:48:14.04 +67:30:44.2 | 0656 3886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:48:14.07 +67:30:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66518_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66518_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 18.21667 | 2461209.71667 | 14.09 | 09:46:31.58 +65:55:14.8 | 4043 5626 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-11-49_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0154.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 13.91 | 09:46:31.88 +65:55:15.3 | 4039 5632 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66554_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66554_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 14.34 | 09:49:15.41 +71:34:36.0 | 4251 2224 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 09:49:15.30 +71:34:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66585_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66585_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 14.33 | 10:48:42.29 +66:51:01.5 | 0489 4255 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:48:42.19 +66:51:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66596_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66596_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 14.19 | 09:25:38.58 +71:17:51.2 | 5369 2462 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 09:25:38.68 +71:17:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66602_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66602_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 14.15 | 08:46:32.55 +72:34:27.0 | 7142 1571 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 08:46:32.35 +72:34:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66684_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 66684_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 14.36 | 10:18:59.51 +72:24:02.1 | 2970 1496 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:18:59.04 +72:24:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 9.81 | 08:04:00.05 +73:24:29.5 | 8871 0627 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 08:04:00.07 +73:24:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 9.83 | 10:55:40.08 +71:52:07.9 | 1244 1277 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:40.11 +71:52:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155
The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 06 18.21722 | 2461209.71722 | 7.60 | 10:44:37.63 +68:46:32.8 | 1111 3232 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-18_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_001842_TTUQ1b1x1_3311622_nmTJbpRv/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-18_00-12-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0155.fits |
**** FOUND 10:44:37.64 +68:46:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.71666550 -observatory V36
07:31:06.60 +22:22:10.3 Mercury (0.7mag)
08:32:09.89 +20:55:44.6 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:18:51.79 +17:50:05.9 Mars (1.3mag)
07:56:57.61 +21:09:13.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:59.23 +03:02:34.4 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:02:32.88 +20:32:07.6 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:38.12 +00:19:26.5 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:43.69 -23:08:29.1 Pluto (14.5mag)
08:48:34.64 +18:56:33.2 Moon (-9.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 18 00:28 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.71666550:
07:56:53.28 +21:09:26.4 Io (6.2mag)
07:56:48.96 +21:09:42.2 Europa (6.3mag)
07:57:11.11 +21:08:33.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:56:59.14 +21:09:14.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:56:39.34 +20:46:45.6 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:57:00.83 +21:09:03.1 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:56:22.32 +20:58:01.2 Elara (17.6mag)
07:59:37.82 +21:15:26.1 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:03:05.10 +21:11:45.3 Carme (18.9mag)
00:52:03.03 +03:03:00.0 Titan (8.6mag)
00:51:55.63 +03:02:32.6 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:17.91 +03:05:04.2 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:52:10.75 +03:02:49.3 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:28.97 +03:03:03.5 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 18 00:28 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.71666550:
17:28:43.48 -35:36:17.4 JWST
20:32:45.26 -14:09:52.6 Chandra
19:14:45.04 -03:15:56.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 18 00:28 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.71666550 -observatory V36
18:36:01.74 -33:20:14.1 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:03:25.57 -67:59:54.2 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:52:46.18 +32:06:15.0 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:10:45.15 +15:45:50.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
22:51:33.83 -39:40:37.3 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:09:51.08 +31:56:05.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:46:15.85 +27:00:39.2 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:37:13.56 +30:42:44.5 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:56:08.12 +04:21:52.1 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:21:35.65 +21:42:17.8 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:16:05.02 -11:03:14.5 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:09:41.34 +67:04:54.2 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:21:26.39 -07:42:41.6 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:17:02.42 +80:39:04.7 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:24:53.63 +64:40:36.0 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:02:10.48 +28:39:02.3 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:29:45.58 +14:18:08.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:05:21.21 +34:01:57.0 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:28:03.17 -15:08:06.3 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:15:10.52 +32:46:18.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:09.86 +52:08:25.2 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:55:55.27 -11:21:22.5 15.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:32:56.05 +23:09:37.8 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:40:00.26 +04:35:34.2 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:53:26.18 +77:02:53.0 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:17:09.04 +44:04:51.2 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:14:12.39 -00:31:56.9 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:41:38.42 -09:37:49.2 8.2mag 10P/Tempel
11:04:45.32 -01:09:22.6 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:27:09.02 +26:56:58.3 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:21:20.71 +20:50:44.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:35:00.29 -05:47:38.2 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:16:01.22 +34:11:42.6 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:33:30.24 +18:23:36.9 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:41:46.86 +06:54:49.5 15.8mag 88P/Howell
05:26:49.13 +30:50:26.6 15.4mag 93P/Lovas
03:12:01.47 +29:05:57.7 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:14:39.32 +32:33:53.2 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:07:49.10 +10:22:27.0 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:15:34.57 +19:51:57.9 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:53:25.29 +19:27:47.6 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:39:14.02 +17:17:09.8 15.9mag 141P/Machholz
06:42:36.36 +17:53:54.4 15.9mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:42:59.52 +17:10:19.0 12.7mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:04:30.54 -23:23:31.0 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:15:07.16 +27:35:20.9 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:33:47.05 +04:57:11.3 16.3mag 169P/NEAT
00:45:03.22 +04:20:13.4 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:45:03.23 -08:08:03.6 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR
07:57:09.98 +34:59:07.9 17.7mag 240P/NEAT
00:58:52.12 +01:53:51.0 16.1mag 260P/McNaught
04:32:03.44 +34:10:33.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:46:07.66 +01:23:28.0 17.9mag 320P/McNaught
15:11:13.06 +07:39:24.9 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:15:19.79 +20:27:53.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:16:17.86 +40:57:54.2 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 18 00:28 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 18 00:28 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 18 00:28 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
12:27:47.187 +13:03:22.54 AT 2026ott 2026-05-19.03 20.15
12:22:38.942 +08:51:07.24 AT 2026ots 2026-05-19.02 20.44
09:46:20.889 +09:01:23.97 AT 2026otr 2026-05-18.96 20.1
22:34:44.197 +27:06:25.62 AT 2026otq 2026-06-09.56 18.841
00:15:02.869 -38:28:54.72 AT 2026otp 2026-05-22.42 20.11
23:31:16.630 -35:03:18.75 AT 2026oto 2026-05-04.41 19.11
12:25:14.599 +12:58:16.51 AT 2026otn 2026-05-19.03 20.12
10:04:42.371 +12:40:27.29 AT 2026otm 2026-05-04.99 20.5
18:56:24.084 -24:59:43.12 AT 2026otl 2026-06-07.38 18.4151
14:25:58.906 -19:09:39.58 AT 2026otk 2026-06-09.32 19.3712
16:32:34.784 -13:42:09.08 AT 2026otj 2026-05-22.23 22.76
01:51:40.895 +18:21:06.04 AT 2026oti 2026-06-06.48 18.6484
00:00:06.428 +20:53:35.17 AT 2026oth 2026-06-09.47 20.2357
00:28:14.152 +32:16:04.97 AT 2026otg 2026-06-06.47 20.084
19:34:17.664 -12:11:29.15 AT 2026otf 2026-06-05.42 19.9617
13:53:56.659 +06:57:27.66 AT 2026ote 2026-06-05.32 20.3259
20:18:10.019 +06:04:43.69 AT 2026otd 2026-06-05.43 20.4063
22:17:48.869 +03:46:37.28 AT 2026otc 2026-06-05.45 20.2117
13:46:37.393 +66:54:16.51 AT 2026otb 2026-06-06.37 19.239
10:21:58.883 +19:58:08.57 AT 2026ota 2026-06-09.26 18.926
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 18 00:28 tns_transients_list.txt