NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-06-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 738555 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 738555 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits

renamed 'UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits_preview.png'
UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 455.8761 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 544.8872 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1179.2302 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 534.7757 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1178.6045 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 533.7268 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.58673 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-17T23:43:03.8660136' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T04:43:03.8660136' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.1965725231 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T04:43:13.7669381' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.1966871065 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 148.233749244908 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9998785410285 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.5127777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 317.954166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.08807176262505 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29470 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29470 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 32.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.2 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits :) Spent 0.635270 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-17T23:43:46.6389248' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T04:43:46.6389248' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.1970675695 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T04:43:56.5395695' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.1971821645 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 148.233749263257 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9998785528283 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 28.415 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 317.993055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.09459783628707 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29470 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29470 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 33.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 24.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits :) Spent 0.655957 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits


fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.69668826 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:53:23.678 +54:02:43.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 Second-epoch image center 09:53:23.678 +54:02:43.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0713 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:53:22.863 +54:03:22.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 Second-epoch image center 09:53:22.863 +54:03:22.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:53:23.678 +54:02:43.26 Second-epoch second image center 09:53:22.863 +54:03:22.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01117 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D4NiulaHUF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A4i8nNpsyA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bWX7XRs5KL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e9A4QrRT1D Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5566 to +59.4234 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5566 to 59.4234 deg Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4198 out of 4385 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8251 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.894600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.894600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.44 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5566 to +59.4234 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5566 to 59.4234 deg Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4198 out of 4385 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8251 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 8222 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6961 to 162.5839 deg, Dec +47.5565 to +59.4234 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6961 to 162.5839 deg, Dec 47.5565 to 59.4234 deg Loaded 6340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4385 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4385 out of 8222 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 2.1 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 3.3 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 3.3 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 14.8 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.D4NiulaHUF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=8251 Got 8251 stars (including 7709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8251 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8121 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8122 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8122 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=265 n_q2=239 n_q3=229 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.A4i8nNpsyA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=547, passed=8222 Got 8222 stars (including 7663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8222 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8100 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=262 n_q2=240 n_q3=229 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.126 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bWX7XRs5KL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=325, passed=6683 Got 6683 stars (including 6351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6683 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6652 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6651 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6651 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=248 n_q2=221 n_q3=242 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.139 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.e9A4QrRT1D (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=6738 Got 6738 stars (including 6405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6738 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6705 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6706 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6706 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=247 n_q2=223 n_q3=240 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits sigma_overall=0.313 worst_q_ratio=1.166 ref2=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits sigma_overall=0.321 worst_q_ratio=1.126 new1=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.139 new2=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.184 reference average sigma_overall=0.317 worst_q_ratio=1.146 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120_astrometric_residuals.png (974 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:08:47.46 +51:31:38.8: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:08:47.46 +51:31:38.8: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:08:47.46 +51:31:38.8: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4571 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20799_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 20799_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.19669    2461209.69669    12.47    09:08:47.46 +51:31:38.9   8897 4643   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    12.45    09:08:47.46 +51:31:38.8   8895 4649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:53:23.678 +54:02:43.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 Second-epoch image center 09:53:23.678 +54:02:43.26 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0713 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:53:22.863 +54:03:22.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:53:00.838 +54:00:04.16 Second-epoch image center 09:53:22.863 +54:03:22.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:53:23.678 +54:02:43.26 Second-epoch second image center 09:53:22.863 +54:03:22.84 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01117 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QdEFg422wJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sntwaOZEM9 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HQyOPtMtcr Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L8CBUOVfLi Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 42364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec +47.5272 to +59.4411 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec 47.5272 to 59.4411 deg Loaded 6377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3960 out of 4415 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4415 out of 42364 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.797800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.797800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 42364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec +47.5272 to +59.4411 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6960 to 162.6266 deg, Dec 47.5272 to 59.4411 deg Loaded 6377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3960 out of 4415 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4415 out of 42364 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 42530 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.6812 to 162.6260 deg, Dec +47.5271 to +59.4461 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.6812 to 162.6260 deg, Dec 47.5271 to 59.4461 deg Loaded 6384 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3952 out of 4417 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 4417 out of 42530 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits (aperture=4.9) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 2.0 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 3.1 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 3.1 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 2.0 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 2.0 pix wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 14.9 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.QdEFg422wJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2009, passed=42346 Got 42346 stars (including 40287 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42346 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41805 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41806 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41806 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=262 n_q2=240 n_q3=231 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.sntwaOZEM9 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2054, passed=42513 Got 42513 stars (including 40394 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42513 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42064 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.5 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42066 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 42066 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=257 n_q2=240 n_q3=230 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.059 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.HQyOPtMtcr (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1062, passed=28797 Got 28797 stars (including 27694 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28797 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28619 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=247 n_q2=224 n_q3=243 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.L8CBUOVfLi (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1065, passed=29123 Got 29123 stars (including 28024 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29123 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28946 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 749 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28947 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=244 n_q2=222 n_q3=249 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.198 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:05:02.44 +55:26:40.7: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:01:51.98 +55:13:25.6: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:59:37.70 +56:47:41.1: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 09:53:37.15 +51:58:21.4: 13.74 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:33:30.83 +56:46:11.6: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:35:16.07 +54:49:48.4: 14.29 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:05:02.44 +55:26:40.7: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:01:51.98 +55:13:25.6: 14.24 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:05:02.44 +55:26:40.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6808 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:01:51.98 +55:13:25.6: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3990 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:53:37.15 +51:58:21.4: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:33:30.83 +56:46:11.6: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:37.15 +51:58:21.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5676 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:30.83 +56:46:11.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6425 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 09:59:37.70 +56:47:41.1: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-32-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0320.fits at 10:02:29.67 +54:29:43.8: 15.04 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:37.70 +56:47:41.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8736 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:35:16.07 +54:49:48.4: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:16.07 +54:49:48.4: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1939 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_01-33-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0321.fits at 10:02:29.67 +54:29:43.8: 15.12 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:02:29.67 +54:29:43.8: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7412 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52870_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 52870_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.19669    2461209.69669    14.60    10:01:52.00 +55:13:26.7   4107 2432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    14.30    10:01:51.97 +55:13:24.4   4105 2439   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53353_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53353_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    12.74    09:29:07.23 +50:00:39.0   6997 5678   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 09:29:07.19 +50:00:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53486_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53486_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.19669    2461209.69669    12.91    09:59:37.68 +56:47:41.0   4376 1505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    12.85    09:59:37.71 +56:47:41.2   4375 1511   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53550_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53550_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.14    10:24:46.09 +58:27:07.9   2482 0250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 10:24:46.14 +58:27:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53880_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53880_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.19669    2461209.69669    13.55    09:53:37.24 +51:58:20.5   4693 4440   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.59    09:53:37.05 +51:58:22.3   4691 4446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53920_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53920_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.19669    2461209.69669    13.64    10:33:30.78 +56:46:11.6   1594 1112   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.64    10:33:30.88 +56:46:11.6   1592 1118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53939_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53939_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.19669    2461209.69669    13.62    10:05:02.47 +55:26:40.0   3849 2274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.76    10:05:02.40 +55:26:41.3   3848 2280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53987_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 53987_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.71    10:26:05.72 +52:37:55.8   1762 3702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 10:26:05.88 +52:37:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54011_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 54011_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.51    09:36:47.35 +56:59:21.2   6258 1471   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 09:36:47.35 +56:59:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54121_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 54121_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.78    09:40:37.45 +53:20:28.3   5908 3668   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 09:40:37.46 +53:20:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54157_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 54157_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.86    09:46:15.00 +57:06:33.0   5483 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 09:46:15.06 +57:06:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54191_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 54191_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    13.92    09:44:56.96 +52:01:05.7   5495 4456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 09:44:56.99 +52:01:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54193_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 54193_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    14.06    09:55:55.51 +52:15:23.7   4490 4262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 09:55:55.46 +52:15:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54316_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 54316_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    14.34    09:50:10.65 +55:05:27.1   5102 2588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits **** FOUND 09:50:10.46 +55:05:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54399_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 54399_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.19669    2461209.69669    14.20    10:35:16.06 +54:49:48.3   1207 2233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    14.19    10:35:16.08 +54:49:48.5   1205 2239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54750_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 The candidate 54750_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.19669    2461209.69669    14.76    10:02:29.68 +54:29:44.6   4013 2864   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0120.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.19718    2461209.69718    14.73    10:02:29.67 +54:29:42.9   4011 2871   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_235034_TTUQ1b1x1_260757_3Uat56mi/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-43-46_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0121.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-06-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.69668826 -observatory V36 07:31:02.51 +22:22:33.4 Mercury (0.7mag) 08:32:04.13 +20:56:05.9 Venus (-4.0mag) 03:18:48.25 +17:49:51.7 Mars (1.3mag) 07:56:56.57 +21:09:16.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:58.94 +03:02:33.0 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:02:32.60 +20:32:06.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:38.07 +00:19:26.2 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:43.77 -23:08:28.6 Pluto (14.5mag) 08:47:19.21 +19:04:29.7 Moon (-9.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 17 23:58 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.69668826: 07:56:52.51 +21:09:28.3 Io (6.2mag) 07:56:47.79 +21:09:45.4 Europa (6.3mag) 07:57:09.87 +21:08:37.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:56:57.88 +21:09:18.4 Callisto (6.9mag) 07:56:38.36 +20:46:48.2 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:56:59.22 +21:09:08.0 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:56:21.38 +20:58:04.3 Elara (17.6mag) 07:59:36.72 +21:15:29.6 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:03:04.11 +21:11:48.0 Carme (18.9mag) 00:52:02.83 +03:02:58.4 Titan (8.6mag) 00:51:55.26 +03:02:31.5 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:52:17.67 +03:05:02.8 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:52:10.52 +03:02:47.7 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:52:28.71 +03:03:02.2 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 17 23:58 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.69668826: 17:28:49.08 -35:35:58.6 JWST 20:22:16.31 -10:16:12.0 Chandra 19:02:31.02 -10:02:21.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 17 23:58 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.69668826 -observatory V36 18:36:02.72 -33:20:09.4 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:03:24.36 -67:59:54.4 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:52:45.73 +32:06:14.0 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:10:45.63 +15:45:48.3 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 22:51:21.56 -39:42:26.1 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:09:51.48 +31:56:03.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:46:14.39 +27:00:39.1 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:37:12.63 +30:42:47.3 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:56:07.43 +04:21:49.4 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:21:36.46 +21:42:17.7 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:16:05.38 -11:03:13.9 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:09:42.08 +67:04:50.6 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:21:29.38 -07:42:33.9 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:17:02.21 +80:39:22.0 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:24:51.82 +64:40:33.2 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:02:08.73 +28:38:57.1 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:29:46.44 +14:18:03.7 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:05:22.27 +34:01:36.8 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:28:01.96 -15:08:11.7 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:15:09.41 +32:46:31.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:32:09.97 +52:08:29.9 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:55:54.07 -11:21:18.7 15.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:32:54.93 +23:09:39.5 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:00.16 +04:35:35.4 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:53:29.02 +77:02:41.1 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:17:07.16 +44:04:46.7 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:14:11.95 -00:32:17.5 16.6mag A/2026 E1 20:41:36.33 -09:37:38.6 8.2mag 10P/Tempel 11:04:44.95 -01:09:20.9 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:27:07.17 +26:56:49.2 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:21:18.16 +20:51:06.3 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:34:59.38 -05:47:41.7 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:15:57.31 +34:11:39.1 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:33:27.30 +18:23:29.2 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:41:44.41 +06:54:35.6 15.8mag 88P/Howell 05:26:45.28 +30:50:24.4 15.4mag 93P/Lovas 03:11:57.88 +29:05:48.2 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:14:36.41 +32:33:57.6 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:07:46.97 +10:22:57.5 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos 04:15:32.58 +19:51:53.9 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:53:22.91 +19:27:45.5 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 06:39:09.36 +17:17:21.2 15.9mag 141P/Machholz 06:42:31.58 +17:53:55.0 15.9mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:42:53.85 +17:10:14.6 12.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:04:29.74 -23:23:39.7 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 04:15:03.04 +27:34:55.6 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:33:47.72 +04:56:45.8 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 00:45:00.04 +04:20:00.7 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:45:04.04 -08:08:04.9 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR 07:57:07.30 +34:59:12.3 17.7mag 240P/NEAT 00:58:48.89 +01:53:18.9 16.1mag 260P/McNaught 04:32:00.01 +34:10:22.0 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:46:02.14 +01:22:20.9 17.9mag 320P/McNaught 15:11:13.50 +07:39:28.8 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:15:18.78 +20:27:55.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:16:15.90 +40:57:59.7 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 17 23:58 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 17 23:58 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 17 23:58 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 12:27:47.187 +13:03:22.54 AT 2026ott 2026-05-19.03 20.15 12:22:38.942 +08:51:07.24 AT 2026ots 2026-05-19.02 20.44 09:46:20.889 +09:01:23.97 AT 2026otr 2026-05-18.96 20.1 22:34:44.197 +27:06:25.62 AT 2026otq 2026-06-09.56 18.841 00:15:02.869 -38:28:54.72 AT 2026otp 2026-05-22.42 20.11 23:31:16.630 -35:03:18.75 AT 2026oto 2026-05-04.41 19.11 12:25:14.599 +12:58:16.51 AT 2026otn 2026-05-19.03 20.12 10:04:42.371 +12:40:27.29 AT 2026otm 2026-05-04.99 20.5 18:56:24.084 -24:59:43.12 AT 2026otl 2026-06-07.38 18.4151 14:25:58.906 -19:09:39.58 AT 2026otk 2026-06-09.32 19.3712 16:32:34.784 -13:42:09.08 AT 2026otj 2026-05-22.23 22.76 01:51:40.895 +18:21:06.04 AT 2026oti 2026-06-06.48 18.6484 00:00:06.428 +20:53:35.17 AT 2026oth 2026-06-09.47 20.2357 00:28:14.152 +32:16:04.97 AT 2026otg 2026-06-06.47 20.084 19:34:17.664 -12:11:29.15 AT 2026otf 2026-06-05.42 19.9617 13:53:56.659 +06:57:27.66 AT 2026ote 2026-06-05.32 20.3259 20:18:10.019 +06:04:43.69 AT 2026otd 2026-06-05.43 20.4063 22:17:48.869 +03:46:37.28 AT 2026otc 2026-06-05.45 20.2117 13:46:37.393 +66:54:16.51 AT 2026otb 2026-06-06.37 19.239 10:21:58.883 +19:58:08.57 AT 2026ota 2026-06-09.26 18.926 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 17 23:58 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 90 C