NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Leo-02-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Leo-02-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-02-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-02-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 744226 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 744226 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits_preview.png'
Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits

renamed 'Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits_preview.png'
Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 477.1196 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 464.9675 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1338.8617 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 512.6805 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1333.1750 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 472.9492 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.80613 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.084 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-17T23:19:39.7470309' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T04:19:39.7470309' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.1803211458 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T04:19:49.6529892' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.180435787 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 152.303981241496 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 22.0000465303093 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.5297222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 281.998055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.59509665038105 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 35.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/d_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits :) Spent 0.671163 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/d_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-17T23:20:32.4289559' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T04:20:32.4289559' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.1809308794 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T04:20:42.3326029' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.1810455094 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 5.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 152.30398125256 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 22.0000465262596 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.3530555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 282.103333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.61427334299625 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Leo-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '10 09 14' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+22 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20444 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.8799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 11.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 35.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 25.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits SET-TEMP= 5.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 5.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits CCD-TEMP= 4.800000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/d_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits :) Spent 0.676930 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/d_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 20659.746399 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=14784.5, right_median=14894.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits


fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.68043689 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:13.509 +22:00:21.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 Second-epoch image center 10:09:13.509 +22:00:21.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0018 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:10.836 +21:59:41.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 Second-epoch image center 10:09:10.836 +21:59:41.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0155 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:09:13.509 +22:00:21.25 Second-epoch second image center 10:09:10.836 +21:59:41.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01511 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.21IFr7IVEM Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ppCyWdmDfR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LitbEntv8t Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2ADZjHYM2S Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec +16.5185 to +27.2615 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec 16.5185 to 27.2615 deg Loaded 4556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3734 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3734 out of 6437 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.753000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.753000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec +16.5185 to +27.2615 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9789 deg, Dec 16.5185 to 27.2615 deg Loaded 4556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3605 out of 3734 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3734 out of 6437 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=6.5) Read 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5061 to 160.9546 deg, Dec +16.5183 to +27.2615 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5061 to 160.9546 deg, Dec 16.5183 to 27.2615 deg Loaded 4550 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3596 out of 3736 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3736 out of 6417 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=6.5) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.5 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 2.5 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 2.4 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 2.5 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 15.2 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.21IFr7IVEM (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=398, passed=6437 Got 6437 stars (including 6029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6437 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6319 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.467 n_q1=203 n_q2=247 n_q3=183 n_q4=271 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ppCyWdmDfR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, passed=6417 Got 6417 stars (including 6016 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6417 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 893 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6300 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6300 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 905 stars left (next iteration limit 995) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=202 n_q2=249 n_q3=184 n_q4=270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.LitbEntv8t (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=295, passed=4309 Got 4309 stars (including 4011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4309 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 886 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4222 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4223 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 896 stars left (next iteration limit 985) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.761 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.491 n_q1=217 n_q2=231 n_q3=197 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.585 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2ADZjHYM2S (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=290, passed=4316 Got 4316 stars (including 4021 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4316 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4234 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4235 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4235 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 894 stars left (next iteration limit 985) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.745 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.565 n_q1=218 n_q2=229 n_q3=196 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.507 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.212 ref2=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits sigma_overall=0.486 worst_q_ratio=1.274 new1=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits sigma_overall=0.480 worst_q_ratio=1.585 new2=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.507 reference average sigma_overall=0.474 worst_q_ratio=1.243 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (904 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190_astrometric_residuals.png (905 matched stars from wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050_astrometric_residuals.png (896 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051_astrometric_residuals.png (894 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03676_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 03676_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    10.68    10:00:02.06 +21:15:44.7   6082 3609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:00:02.06 +21:15:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:13.509 +22:00:21.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 Second-epoch image center 10:09:13.509 +22:00:21.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0018 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Image size: 937.7'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 10:09:10.836 +21:59:41.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 10:09:13.898 +22:00:17.77 Second-epoch image center 10:09:10.836 +21:59:41.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0155 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 10:09:13.509 +22:00:21.25 Second-epoch second image center 10:09:10.836 +21:59:41.54 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01511 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nLylPTTrp5 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xSjmUzw340 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9AlW52FdU4 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cY4Gv8uBgm Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits and wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec +16.4881 to +27.2792 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec 16.4881 to 27.2792 deg Loaded 4577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3478 out of 3774 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 33023 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.627800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.627800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.42
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 33023 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec +16.4881 to +27.2792 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.5062 to 160.9787 deg, Dec 16.4881 to 27.2792 deg Loaded 4577 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3478 out of 3774 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3774 out of 33023 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 33297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 143.4729 to 160.9668 deg, Dec +16.4866 to +27.2736 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 143.4729 to 160.9668 deg, Dec 16.4866 to 27.2736 deg Loaded 4585 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3482 out of 3776 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3776 out of 33297 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 27 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 2.2 pix Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 2.2 pix fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 2.2 pix wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 15.4 mag. Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.nLylPTTrp5 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1503, passed=33005 Got 33005 stars (including 31454 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33005 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 887 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32285 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32285 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32285 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46" Excluding outliers - 898 stars left (next iteration limit 987) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits N_match=898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.644 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=199 n_q2=244 n_q3=181 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.xSjmUzw340 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1479, passed=33286 Got 33286 stars (including 31760 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33286 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 892 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32540 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47" Excluding outliers - 904 stars left (next iteration limit 994) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits N_match=904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.675 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.528 n_q1=198 n_q2=251 n_q3=179 n_q4=276 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.348 The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.9AlW52FdU4 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1145, passed=22775 Got 22775 stars (including 21599 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22775 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22293 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22293 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22293 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 892 stars left (next iteration limit 982) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits N_match=892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.493 n_q1=219 n_q2=215 n_q3=212 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.552 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.cY4Gv8uBgm (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1060, passed=22600 Got 22600 stars (including 21515 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22600 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 879 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22199 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22199 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22199 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" Excluding outliers - 889 stars left (next iteration limit 979) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits N_match=889 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.779 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.636 n_q1=217 n_q2=215 n_q3=215 n_q4=242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.507 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/wcs_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:26:11.50 +20:15:32.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:16:46.38 +23:01:15.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:31:03.65 +22:13:40.8: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:24:37.23 +21:03:23.6: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:16:36.07 +22:56:20.4: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:06:37.29 +17:54:42.6: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:27:15.26 +21:36:35.2: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:16:46.38 +23:01:15.9: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:46.38 +23:01:15.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6843 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:26:11.50 +20:15:32.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:11.50 +20:15:32.1: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3608 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:31:03.65 +22:13:40.8: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:03.65 +22:13:40.8: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1214 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:27:15.71 +18:36:18.3: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:24:37.23 +21:03:23.6: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:06:37.29 +17:54:42.6: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:37:35.33 +22:35:14.8: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:31:42.77 +23:55:01.0: 15.31 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:16:36.07 +22:56:20.4: 13.99 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:27:15.26 +21:36:35.2: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:37.23 +21:03:23.6: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0719 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:16:36.07 +22:56:20.4: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2756 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:27:15.26 +21:36:35.2: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1280 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:06:37.29 +17:54:42.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1150 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:37:35.33 +22:35:14.8: 15.26 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:27:15.71 +18:36:18.3: 14.96 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:31:42.77 +23:55:01.0: 15.51 +/- 0.26 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:35.33 +22:35:14.8: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5857 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.39 +/- 0.16 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:27:15.71 +18:36:18.3: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7065 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:31:42.77 +23:55:01.0: ref_mag=15.39 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8129 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:23:40.48 +18:13:15.3: 15.63 +/- 0.27 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:38:27.92 +24:03:13.3: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:33:57.51 +19:22:31.1: 15.23 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:37:51.62 +20:55:47.1: 15.01 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-29-48_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0189.fits at 10:28:17.83 +24:41:01.4: 15.27 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:23:40.48 +18:13:15.3: 15.17 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:23:40.48 +18:13:15.3: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.9024 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:38:27.92 +24:03:13.3: 15.50 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:37:51.62 +20:55:47.1: 15.40 +/- 0.25 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.15 Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:28:17.83 +24:41:01.4: 15.05 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:27.92 +24:03:13.3: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.8099 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:51.62 +20:55:47.1: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7474 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:28:17.83 +24:41:01.4: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7578 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-04-09_00-30-39_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits at 10:33:57.51 +19:22:31.1: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:57.51 +19:22:31.1: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8830 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52005_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52005_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.26    10:16:06.54 +24:06:36.5   3815 1925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:16:06.54 +24:06:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52007_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52007_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    13.68    10:16:46.37 +23:01:15.6   3731 2591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    13.69    10:16:46.38 +23:01:16.3   3725 2584   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52008_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52008_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    12.71    10:16:44.33 +18:22:12.6   3734 5400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:16:44.36 +18:22:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52015_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52015_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    12.04    10:16:48.83 +24:27:17.8   3717 1716   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:16:48.83 +24:27:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52025_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52025_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    13.00    10:23:51.99 +19:34:29.3   2715 4668   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:23:52.01 +19:34:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52026_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52026_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    12.99    10:26:52.47 +19:22:42.1   2282 4785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:26:52.47 +19:22:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52029_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52029_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    12.81    09:51:55.58 +24:21:48.0   7148 1689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 09:51:55.68 +24:21:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52033_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52033_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    13.31    10:26:11.56 +20:15:32.3   2394 4257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    13.42    10:26:11.44 +20:15:31.8   2388 4251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52037_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52037_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    13.55    10:20:25.24 +25:41:01.4   3222 0968   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:20:25.24 +25:41:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52038_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52038_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    13.56    09:51:44.13 +20:10:32.7   7281 4225   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 09:51:44.15 +20:10:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52040_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52040_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    13.64    09:50:55.65 +20:47:16.5   7380 3849   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 09:50:55.69 +20:47:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52042_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52042_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    13.71    09:59:30.63 +21:18:01.4   6155 3583   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 09:59:30.62 +21:18:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52046_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52046_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.11    10:31:03.66 +22:13:40.2   1724 3052   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.13    10:31:03.64 +22:13:41.4   1718 3045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52047_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52047_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.13    10:27:15.51 +21:36:35.1   2255 3436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.12    10:27:15.01 +21:36:35.4   2250 3429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52049_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52049_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.07    10:06:02.43 +23:50:17.8   5207 2073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:06:02.33 +23:50:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52052_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52052_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.16    10:24:37.22 +21:03:23.6   2624 3776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.01    10:24:37.25 +21:03:23.6   2617 3769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52066_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52066_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.22    10:06:37.23 +17:54:44.1   5199 5667   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.04    10:06:37.35 +17:54:41.2   5192 5661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52070_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52070_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.32    10:16:36.05 +22:56:19.4   3755 2640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.24    10:16:36.10 +22:56:21.3   3749 2633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52076_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52076_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.54    10:37:35.34 +22:35:14.2   0805 2808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.65    10:37:35.32 +22:35:15.3   0799 2802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52100_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52100_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.66    10:27:15.67 +18:36:17.0   2225 5261   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.78    10:27:15.74 +18:36:19.7   2219 5255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52117_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52117_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.72    10:31:42.70 +23:55:00.6   1655 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.97    10:31:42.84 +23:55:01.5   1648 2017   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52123_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52123_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.81    10:38:27.87 +24:03:11.7   0710 1910   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.81    10:38:27.98 +24:03:14.9   0704 1903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52131_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52131_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.85    10:33:57.51 +19:22:29.9   1267 4778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.93    10:33:57.52 +19:22:32.3   1261 4772   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52136_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52136_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.79    10:23:40.35 +18:13:14.8   2741 5499   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    15.18    10:23:40.61 +18:13:15.8   2734 5492   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52141_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52141_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.82    10:37:51.73 +20:55:47.0   0733 3817   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.71    10:37:51.52 +20:55:47.1   0727 3811   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52168_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 52168_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.18044    2461209.68044    14.87    10:28:17.86 +24:41:00.8   2139 1568   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-19-39_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0050.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    14.70    10:28:17.80 +24:41:02.1   2132 1561   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 The candidate 18572_fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.18105    2461209.68105    10.71    10:00:02.06 +21:15:44.9   6082 3609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_234006_TTUQ2b1x1_3667136_dztV1T5U/fd_Leo-02-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_23-20-32_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0051.fits **** FOUND 10:00:02.06 +21:15:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Leo-02-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.68043689 -observatory V36 07:30:59.18 +22:22:52.3 Mercury (0.7mag) 08:31:59.44 +20:56:23.1 Venus (-4.0mag) 03:18:45.37 +17:49:40.2 Mars (1.3mag) 07:56:55.73 +21:09:18.3 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:58.70 +03:02:31.8 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:02:32.38 +20:32:06.3 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:38.03 +00:19:26.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:43.84 -23:08:28.1 Pluto (14.5mag) 08:46:19.99 +19:10:59.5 Moon (-9.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 17 23:42 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.68043689: 07:56:51.89 +21:09:29.7 Io (6.2mag) 07:56:46.85 +21:09:47.9 Europa (6.3mag) 07:57:08.85 +21:08:40.0 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:56:56.85 +21:09:21.3 Callisto (6.9mag) 07:56:37.57 +20:46:50.4 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:56:57.87 +21:09:12.0 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:56:20.61 +20:58:06.8 Elara (17.6mag) 07:59:35.83 +21:15:32.4 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:03:03.31 +21:11:50.2 Carme (18.9mag) 00:52:02.66 +03:02:57.1 Titan (8.6mag) 00:51:54.97 +03:02:30.5 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:52:17.47 +03:05:01.7 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:52:10.33 +03:02:46.4 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:52:28.50 +03:03:01.2 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 17 23:43 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.68043689: 17:28:53.33 -35:35:39.5 JWST 20:14:57.34 -07:32:42.2 Chandra 18:53:20.48 -14:56:43.6 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 17 23:43 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.68043689 -observatory V36 18:36:03.51 -33:20:05.7 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:03:23.38 -67:59:54.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:52:45.36 +32:06:13.2 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:10:46.02 +15:45:46.4 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 22:51:11.53 -39:43:54.6 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:09:51.80 +31:56:01.2 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:46:13.20 +27:00:39.1 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:37:11.88 +30:42:49.7 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:56:06.86 +04:21:47.1 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:21:37.12 +21:42:17.6 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:16:05.68 -11:03:13.5 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:09:42.68 +67:04:47.7 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:21:31.82 -07:42:27.7 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:17:02.04 +80:39:36.1 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:24:50.35 +64:40:31.0 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:02:07.30 +28:38:52.9 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:29:47.15 +14:17:59.8 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:05:23.12 +34:01:20.4 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:28:00.98 -15:08:16.1 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:15:08.51 +32:46:41.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:32:10.07 +52:08:33.8 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:55:53.09 -11:21:15.7 15.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:32:54.03 +23:09:40.9 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:00.08 +04:35:36.3 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:53:31.32 +77:02:31.4 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:17:05.63 +44:04:43.1 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:14:11.60 -00:32:34.3 16.6mag A/2026 E1 20:41:34.62 -09:37:29.9 8.2mag 10P/Tempel 11:04:44.65 -01:09:19.5 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:27:05.66 +26:56:41.8 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:21:16.08 +20:51:23.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:34:58.64 -05:47:44.6 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:15:54.13 +34:11:36.2 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:33:24.91 +18:23:23.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:41:42.42 +06:54:24.2 15.8mag 88P/Howell 05:26:42.15 +30:50:22.6 15.4mag 93P/Lovas 03:11:54.96 +29:05:40.4 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:14:34.03 +32:34:01.1 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:07:45.24 +10:23:22.2 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos 04:15:30.96 +19:51:50.6 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:53:20.98 +19:27:43.8 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 06:39:05.57 +17:17:30.5 15.9mag 141P/Machholz 06:42:27.70 +17:53:55.4 15.9mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:42:49.24 +17:10:11.0 12.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:04:29.08 -23:23:46.9 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 04:14:59.69 +27:34:35.1 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:33:48.26 +04:56:25.1 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 00:44:57.45 +04:19:50.4 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:45:04.70 -08:08:06.0 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR 07:57:05.12 +34:59:15.9 17.7mag 240P/NEAT 00:58:46.26 +01:52:52.8 16.1mag 260P/McNaught 04:31:57.23 +34:10:12.9 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:45:57.63 +01:21:26.3 17.9mag 320P/McNaught 15:11:13.85 +07:39:32.0 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:15:17.96 +20:27:57.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:16:14.31 +40:58:04.2 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 17 23:43 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 17 23:42 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 17 23:42 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 12:22:38.942 +08:51:07.24 AT 2026ots 2026-05-19.02 20.44 09:46:20.889 +09:01:23.97 AT 2026otr 2026-05-18.96 20.1 22:34:44.197 +27:06:25.62 AT 2026otq 2026-06-09.56 18.841 00:15:02.869 -38:28:54.72 AT 2026otp 2026-05-22.42 20.11 23:31:16.630 -35:03:18.75 AT 2026oto 2026-05-04.41 19.11 12:25:14.599 +12:58:16.51 AT 2026otn 2026-05-19.03 20.12 10:04:42.371 +12:40:27.29 AT 2026otm 2026-05-04.99 20.5 18:56:24.084 -24:59:43.12 AT 2026otl 2026-06-07.38 18.4151 14:25:58.906 -19:09:39.58 AT 2026otk 2026-06-09.32 19.3712 16:32:34.784 -13:42:09.08 AT 2026otj 2026-05-22.23 22.76 01:51:40.895 +18:21:06.04 AT 2026oti 2026-06-06.48 18.6484 00:00:06.428 +20:53:35.17 AT 2026oth 2026-06-09.47 20.2357 00:28:14.152 +32:16:04.97 AT 2026otg 2026-06-06.47 20.084 19:34:17.664 -12:11:29.15 AT 2026otf 2026-06-05.42 19.9617 13:53:56.659 +06:57:27.66 AT 2026ote 2026-06-05.32 20.3259 20:18:10.019 +06:04:43.69 AT 2026otd 2026-06-05.43 20.4063 22:17:48.869 +03:46:37.28 AT 2026otc 2026-06-05.45 20.2117 13:46:37.393 +66:54:16.51 AT 2026otb 2026-06-06.37 19.239 10:21:58.883 +19:58:08.57 AT 2026ota 2026-06-09.26 18.926 21:57:01.028 +09:41:20.99 AT 2026osz 2026-06-09.46 19.758 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 17 23:42 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 87 C