This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 10.79 10:44:21.17 +02:21:41.2
246.61719 50.78463 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.7 Iris -0 0 0 11.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:44:21.17 +02:21:41.2: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:44:21.17 +02:21:41.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 10 44 21.17 +02 21 41.2 10.8 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,10.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 10.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 12.61 11:37:57.34 +04:46:06.1
261.61335 61.59584 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.65 Cybele 1 0 1 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:37:57.34 +04:46:06.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:37:57.34 +04:46:06.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 37 57.34 +04 46 06.1 12.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 12.58 11:23:50.27 +03:18:39.2
257.82449 58.29002 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna 1 0 1 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:23:50.27 +03:18:39.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:23:50.27 +03:18:39.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 23 50.27 +03 18 39.2 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,12.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 12.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 13.32 11:02:32.62 +03:33:17.3
250.36571 54.90026 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.35 Leukothea 0 1 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:02:32.62 +03:33:17.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:02:32.62 +03:33:17.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 02 32.62 +03 33 17.3 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 13.64 11:16:42.24 +02:19:36.9
256.44933 56.39504 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita 1 -0 1 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:16:42.24 +02:19:36.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:16:42.24 +02:19:36.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 16 42.24 +02 19 36.9 13.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 13.71 11:37:37.66 +07:16:05.6
258.15838 63.52580 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.595 Polyxena 0 1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:37:37.66 +07:16:05.6: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:37:37.66 +07:16:05.6: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 37 37.66 +07 16 05.6 13.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 13.93 11:06:18.98 +03:51:47.3
251.15852 55.78212 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria 1 0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:06:18.98 +03:51:47.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:06:18.98 +03:51:47.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 06 18.98 +03 51 47.3 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 14.18 11:17:07.31 +08:02:19.3
249.08106 60.62558 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa 1 0 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:17:07.31 +08:02:19.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:17:07.31 +08:02:19.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 17 07.31 +08 02 19.3 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,14.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 14.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 14.14 10:52:37.27 +04:12:44.4
246.63543 53.55665 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.554 Peraga 1 0 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:52:37.27 +04:12:44.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:52:37.27 +04:12:44.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 10 52 37.27 +04 12 44.4 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 14.24 11:29:07.15 +02:31:03.4
260.73866 58.47568 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia 2 0 2 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:29:07.15 +02:31:03.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:29:07.15 +02:31:03.4: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 29 07.15 +02 31 03.4 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 14.19 11:00:43.06 +02:07:38.1
251.52499 53.56356 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.336 Lacadiera 1 0 1 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:00:43.06 +02:07:38.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:00:43.06 +02:07:38.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 00 43.06 +02 07 38.1 14.2 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,14.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 14.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 14.40 11:13:24.23 +06:00:02.4
250.69512 58.54290 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.136 Austria 1 0 1 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:13:24.23 +06:00:02.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:13:24.23 +06:00:02.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 13 24.23 +06 00 02.4 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 14.48 11:15:21.48 +06:58:10.3
250.01825 59.56917 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope 1 0 1 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:15:21.48 +06:58:10.3: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:15:21.48 +06:58:10.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 11 15 21.48 +06 58 10.3 14.5 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,14.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 14.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 18.1735 2461209.6735 12.82 10:54:34.30 +01:23:36.4
250.56346 51.96398 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.88 Thisbe -0 -0 0 13.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:54:34.30 +01:23:36.4: 15.45 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:54:34.30 +01:23:36.4: 15.50 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.20
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 18.1735* 10 54 34.30 +01 23 36.4 12.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461209.6735,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260618.1735 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
First image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Last image: 2461209.67372294 18.06.2026 04:09:59.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5507
Objects passed selection criteria: 5501
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5056.5
Average stars matched: 4923.5 (97.3697 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 23:26:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
First image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Last image: 2461209.67372294 18.06.2026 04:09:59.662 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 81
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 15 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29573
Objects passed selection criteria: 29482
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 28236.2
Average stars matched: 27001.5 (95.6271 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 23:29:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.67330465
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:44.309 +06:02:22.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:44.309 +06:02:22.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0794 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:45.769 +06:02:11.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:45.769 +06:02:11.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0775 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:44.309 +06:02:22.51
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:45.769 +06:02:11.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00677 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8jxcBJRZ2P
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iZtJoJZS3B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zh3o3zLG3E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.esJrQZz1xs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2590 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3201 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 5626 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.762800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.762800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2590 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3201 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 5626 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5579 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1771 to 175.0846 deg, Dec +0.7335 to +11.2823 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1771 to 175.0846 deg, Dec 0.7335 to 11.2823 deg
Loaded 3902 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3209 out of 3301 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3301 out of 5579 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.3 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
2.1 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.8jxcBJRZ2P (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=5626
Got 5626 stars (including 5255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=239 n_q2=269 n_q3=213 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iZtJoJZS3B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=5576
Got 5576 stars (including 5240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5576 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5486 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.600 n_q1=234 n_q2=264 n_q3=218 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zh3o3zLG3E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, passed=4596
Got 4596 stars (including 4279 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits N_match=944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=239 n_q2=252 n_q3=235 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.esJrQZz1xs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, passed=4558
Got 4558 stars (including 4234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4558 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4468 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits N_match=942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=237 n_q2=253 n_q3=234 n_q4=218 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.081
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.031
ref2=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.212
new1=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.374 worst_q_ratio=1.148
new2=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.081
reference average sigma_overall=0.4995 worst_q_ratio=1.1215
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087_astrometric_residuals.png (942 matched stars from wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:01.17 +09:37:21.2: 11.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:44:21.17 +02:21:41.2: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:01.17 +09:37:21.2: 11.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:44:21.17 +02:21:41.2: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.06 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:01.17 +09:37:21.2: ref_mag=11.06 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3846 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 20367_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20407_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 20407_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:44:21.17 +02:21:41.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:44.309 +06:02:22.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:44.309 +06:02:22.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0794 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:45.769 +06:02:11.59 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:45.769 +06:02:11.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0775 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:44.309 +06:02:22.51
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:45.769 +06:02:11.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00677 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ig31rIEgB1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ephbbJbk25
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jBDMgtqhUw
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DwjaczsILk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29706 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2606 deg
Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3140 out of 3393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3393 out of 29706 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.644950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.644950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29706 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2606 deg
Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3140 out of 3393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3393 out of 29706 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 29098 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1771 to 175.0866 deg, Dec +0.7306 to +11.2850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1771 to 175.0866 deg, Dec 0.7306 to 11.2850 deg
Loaded 3903 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3156 out of 3385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3385 out of 29098 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
2.0 pix fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.2 mag. Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ig31rIEgB1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1187, passed=29686
Got 29686 stars (including 28458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29686 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29428 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=229 n_q2=272 n_q3=219 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.046
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ephbbJbk25 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1226, passed=29081
Got 29081 stars (including 27823 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 948 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=948 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.607 n_q1=232 n_q2=262 n_q3=224 n_q4=230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jBDMgtqhUw (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=842, passed=27325
Got 27325 stars (including 26438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=243 n_q2=253 n_q3=228 n_q4=219 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DwjaczsILk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=890, passed=27706
Got 27706 stars (including 26769 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27706 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27286 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27285 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=238 n_q2=255 n_q3=234 n_q4=216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits -region wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0086.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_232432_TTUQ1b1x1_1686324_Y5AGBn5m/wcs_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:19:27.71 +08:17:49.4: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:01.17 +09:37:21.3: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:23:50.27 +03:18:39.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:37:57.34 +04:46:06.1: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:33:53.31 +06:03:51.3: 14.13 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:21:03.55 +08:33:29.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:19:27.71 +08:17:49.4: 14.72 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:19:27.71 +08:17:49.4: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8250 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:23:50.27 +03:18:39.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:37:57.34 +04:46:06.1: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:01.17 +09:37:21.3: 11.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:33:53.31 +06:03:51.3: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:01.17 +09:37:21.3: ref_mag=11.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.5456 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:33:53.31 +06:03:51.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4458 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:02:32.62 +03:33:17.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:21:03.55 +08:33:29.7: 12.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:03.55 +08:33:29.7: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7258 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:16:42.24 +02:19:36.9: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:37:37.66 +07:16:05.6: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:02:32.62 +03:33:17.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:45.13 +06:01:50.2: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:22.46 +02:31:42.0: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:37:37.66 +07:16:05.6: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:16:42.24 +02:19:36.9: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:21:30.17 +07:25:02.5: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:16.72 +08:24:37.0: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:45.13 +06:01:50.2: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:45.13 +06:01:50.2: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4988 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:06:18.98 +03:51:47.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:22.46 +02:31:42.0: 14.02 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:22.46 +02:31:42.0: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6556 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:16.72 +08:24:37.0: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:21:30.17 +07:25:02.5: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:16.72 +08:24:37.0: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8119 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:30.17 +07:25:02.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9839 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:06:18.98 +03:51:47.3: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:17:07.31 +08:02:19.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:59.10 +01:27:53.3: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:52:37.27 +04:12:44.4: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:29:07.15 +02:31:03.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:17:07.31 +08:02:19.3: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:59.10 +01:27:53.3: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:59.10 +01:27:53.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8969 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:52:37.27 +04:12:44.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:29:07.15 +02:31:03.4: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:14.45 +01:28:33.3: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:14.45 +01:28:33.3: 14.82 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:14.45 +01:28:33.3: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0695 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:00:43.06 +02:07:38.1: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:00:43.06 +02:07:38.1: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:42:56.43 +10:38:02.9: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:31.87 +03:03:36.4: 14.29 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:42:56.43 +10:38:02.9: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:56.43 +10:38:02.9: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2482 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:31.87 +03:03:36.4: 14.32 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:31.87 +03:03:36.4: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1716 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:04.59 +07:02:40.1: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:40:05.04 +09:19:50.9: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:39.08 +09:11:40.0: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:36:23.01 +07:19:32.6: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:13:24.23 +06:00:02.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:04.59 +07:02:40.1: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:04.59 +07:02:40.1: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1583 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:40:05.04 +09:19:50.9: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:05.04 +09:19:50.9: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3354 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:41:31.12 +10:21:33.4: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:39.08 +09:11:40.0: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:36:23.01 +07:19:32.6: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:13:24.23 +06:00:02.4: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:39.08 +09:11:40.0: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2510 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:23.01 +07:19:32.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5375 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:15:21.48 +06:58:10.3: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:41:31.12 +10:21:33.4: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:31.12 +10:21:33.4: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4204 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:37:50.08 +05:58:03.7: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:15:21.48 +06:58:10.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:44:06.95 +10:20:11.1: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:35.18 +05:36:35.9: 14.57 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:40:36.66 +07:29:39.1: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:37:50.08 +05:58:03.7: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:50.08 +05:58:03.7: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3974 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:30.16 +10:50:03.8: 14.65 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:40:36.66 +07:29:39.1: 14.72 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:36.66 +07:29:39.1: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4590 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:44:06.95 +10:20:11.1: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:44:06.95 +10:20:11.1: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4541 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:40:02.27 +05:02:07.9: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:35.18 +05:36:35.9: 15.03 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:35.18 +05:36:35.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4901 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:30.16 +10:50:03.8: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:30.16 +10:50:03.8: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3613 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:40:02.27 +05:02:07.9: 14.80 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:40:31.29 +09:59:24.8: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:02.27 +05:02:07.9: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3061 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:14.19 +09:32:40.9: 14.85 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:42:18.98 +09:16:16.4: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:41:37.10 +09:59:37.4: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:40:31.29 +09:59:24.8: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:31.29 +09:59:24.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5456 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:27.88 +05:43:15.6: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:42:18.98 +09:16:16.4: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:18.98 +09:16:16.4: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5793 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:14.19 +09:32:40.9: 14.52 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:41:37.10 +09:59:37.4: 14.88 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:14.19 +09:32:40.9: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3044 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:29:22.19 +01:18:49.3: 15.21 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:37.10 +09:59:37.4: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5372 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:12:14.98 +11:04:13.4: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:27.88 +05:43:15.6: 15.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.07 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:27.88 +05:43:15.6: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7977 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:29:22.19 +01:18:49.3: 15.28 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:29:22.19 +01:18:49.3: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7234 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:38:17.85 +03:43:59.3: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:12:14.98 +11:04:13.4: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:12:14.98 +11:04:13.4: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7551 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:38:44.04 +09:31:23.6: 15.22 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:21:47.92 +09:47:12.4: 15.09 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:38:17.85 +03:43:59.3: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:17.85 +03:43:59.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4870 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:58.45 +10:24:00.4: 14.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:36:39.82 +07:35:10.2: 15.11 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:21:47.92 +09:47:12.4: 15.57 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:38:46.85 +08:56:40.5: 14.97 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:38:44.04 +09:31:23.6: 15.06 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:21:47.92 +09:47:12.4: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7349 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.13 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:38:44.04 +09:31:23.6: ref_mag=15.13 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.8591 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:42:21.50 +11:00:03.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:36:39.82 +07:35:10.2: 14.98 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.03 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:58.45 +10:24:00.4: 15.02 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:36:39.82 +07:35:10.2: ref_mag=15.03 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6966 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:58.45 +10:24:00.4: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5288 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:38:46.85 +08:56:40.5: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:46.85 +08:56:40.5: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4911 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:43:52.18 +10:47:24.0: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:42:21.50 +11:00:03.2: 15.13 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:42:21.50 +11:00:03.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:41:58.31 +11:00:45.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:40:14.03 +02:53:21.3: 14.73 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:43:52.18 +10:47:24.0: 14.98 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:43:52.18 +10:47:24.0: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6779 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:46:49.80 +06:50:10.9: 15.25 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:26:17.51 +01:44:31.5: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:41:58.31 +11:00:45.2: 14.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:58.31 +11:00:45.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:41:15.15 +07:57:08.3: 14.53 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:40:14.03 +02:53:21.3: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:40:14.03 +02:53:21.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5427 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:00:34.18 +03:33:57.1: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:46:49.80 +06:50:10.9: 15.36 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:26:17.51 +01:44:31.5: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:46:49.80 +06:50:10.9: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.6742 delta=0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:26:17.51 +01:44:31.5: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8213 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:41:15.15 +07:57:08.3: 14.90 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:15.15 +07:57:08.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6948 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:43:52.12 +10:49:11.4: 15.56 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:00:34.18 +03:33:57.1: 14.74 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:00:34.18 +03:33:57.1: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7747 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:39:47.55 +03:35:15.4: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:54:34.30 +01:23:36.4: 15.45 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:43:52.12 +10:49:11.4: 15.50 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.53 +/- 0.21
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:43:52.12 +10:49:11.4: ref_mag=15.53 +/- 0.21 new_mean_mag=14.7024 delta=0.82 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:39:47.55 +03:35:15.4: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:39:47.55 +03:35:15.4: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3118 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:54:34.30 +01:23:36.4: 15.50 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.47 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:54:34.30 +01:23:36.4: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=12.8195 delta=2.65 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19748.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32696.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32707.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32861.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32910.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32929.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33052.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33091.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33121.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33173.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33254.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33297.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 10s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32455_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32455_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32457_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32457_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:26:20.12 +10:18:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32459_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32459_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32461_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32461_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:41:48.47 +04:19:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32462_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32462_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:25.02 +02:04:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32464_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32464_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32527_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32527_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:44:21.17 +02:21:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32572_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32572_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32696_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 32696_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32707_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 32707_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32724_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32724_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:59.63 +05:47:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32861_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 32861_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32872_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32872_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:16.96 +06:01:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32901_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32901_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:10:21.03 +11:03:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32902_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32902_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:58.22 +07:22:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32910_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 32910_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32929_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 32929_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32930_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32930_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32940_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 32940_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33022_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33022_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:07.40 +07:22:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33023_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33023_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33045_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33045_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33052_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33052_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33091_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33091_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33100_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33100_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33119_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33119_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33121_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33121_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33129_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33129_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33146_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33146_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:37:07.95 +03:02:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33173_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33173_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33184_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33184_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33185_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33185_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33211_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33211_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33226_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33226_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33241_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33241_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33246_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33246_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33254_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33254_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33271_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33271_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33282_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33282_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33297_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33297_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33322_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33322_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33324_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33324_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33330_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33330_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33347_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33347_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33357_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33357_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33369_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33369_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33376_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33376_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33386_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33386_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33419_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33419_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33420_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33420_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33423_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33423_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33430_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33430_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33440_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33440_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33443_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33443_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33445_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33445_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:29:34.08 +10:24:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33459_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33459_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33460_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33460_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33466_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33466_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33475_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33475_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33476_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33476_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33483_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33483_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33489_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33489_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33491_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33491_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33499_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33499_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33506_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33506_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33511_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33511_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33558_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33558_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33571_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33571_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33604_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 33604_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30035_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087
The candidate 30035_fd_Leo-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-09-59_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0087 did not pass the final checks
