NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields LMi-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.73    09:45:10.65 +34:50:47.3   5184 5142   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.58    09:45:10.46 +34:50:46.2   5188 5143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 06 18.1755  2461209.6755  14.65  09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7
190.07327  49.70357 galactic  LMi  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 4.3 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 1"  LINEAR 17302403               
Type: RRAB/BL
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
    15.670   CV      Y     0.940   CV                               0.488210000000                                
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7:  16.25 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7:  16.26 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   LMi-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
LMi-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing LMi-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 730704 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 730704 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits_preview.png'
LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits

renamed 'LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.png' -> 'transient_report/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits_preview.png'
LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 446.3853 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 557.4480 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1352.4331 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 559.0807 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1349.2596 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 508.5820 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.02974 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.099 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-17T23:12:17.6631383' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T04:12:17.6631383' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.175204433 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T04:12:27.5659717' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.1753190393 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 147.269792557772 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 38.0000606282343 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.1055555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 299.180555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.18670172754207 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 33.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 23.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits :) Spent 0.796751 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-17T23:12:55.2717582' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-18T04:12:55.2717582' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61209.1756397109 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-18T04:13:05.1725301' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61209.1757543054 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 147.269792565934 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 38.0000606322613 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 26.9902777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 299.235833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.19525274396823 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'LMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 49 06' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 33.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 887.4 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 23.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 0.0 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 0.0 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits :) Spent 0.729435 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/d_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits


fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461209.67532017 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:19.274 +38:02:12.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 Second-epoch image center 09:49:19.274 +38:02:12.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0581 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:21.141 +38:02:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 Second-epoch image center 09:49:21.141 +38:02:17.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0638 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:49:19.274 +38:02:12.60 Second-epoch second image center 09:49:21.141 +38:02:17.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00628 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FaFVQI2QPR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2MRjho16Qq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CGJj1fkD4z Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BJk689v6EI Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec +32.0100 to +43.3731 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec 32.0100 to 43.3731 deg Loaded 5376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3731 out of 3967 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3967 out of 7740 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.916600 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.916600 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec +32.0100 to +43.3731 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3433 to 157.6109 deg, Dec 32.0100 to 43.3731 deg Loaded 5376 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3731 out of 3967 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3967 out of 7740 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 7724 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3436 to 157.6108 deg, Dec +32.0331 to +43.3964 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3436 to 157.6108 deg, Dec 32.0331 to 43.3964 deg Loaded 5377 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3728 out of 3970 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3970 out of 7724 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.2 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 2.2 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 2.1 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 2.2 pix wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.2 pix wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 15.5 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 14.8 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 14.8 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.FaFVQI2QPR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=564, passed=7740 Got 7740 stars (including 7160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7740 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7632 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7630 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7630 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=235 n_q2=215 n_q3=244 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2MRjho16Qq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=572, passed=7724 Got 7724 stars (including 7147 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7724 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7638 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=230 n_q2=211 n_q3=252 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.220 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.CGJj1fkD4z (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=347, passed=4505 Got 4505 stars (including 4149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4505 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 933 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4452 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4451 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4451 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=226 n_q2=271 n_q3=198 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.BJk689v6EI (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=322, passed=4457 Got 4457 stars (including 4127 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4457 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 934 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4393 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4393 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4393 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.335 n_q1=226 n_q2=270 n_q3=196 n_q4=248 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.143 ref2=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits sigma_overall=0.402 worst_q_ratio=1.220 new1=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.115 new2=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.054 reference average sigma_overall=0.3925 worst_q_ratio=1.1815 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091_astrometric_residuals.png (940 matched stars from wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20406_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 20406_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    8.33    09:35:23.66 +39:57:27.0   6469 2106   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:35:23.59 +39:57:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20528_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 20528_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    10.95    10:20:07.45 +32:51:07.8   0685 5947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    10.93    10:20:07.44 +32:51:07.7   0689 5948   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20560_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 20560_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    11.39    09:39:25.60 +34:14:52.9   5886 5536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:39:25.60 +34:14:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20597_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 20597_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    11.67    09:39:43.63 +42:03:11.3   6013 0827   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:39:43.63 +42:03:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01580_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 01580_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    8.47    09:53:43.16 +34:55:35.4   4137 5031   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.15 +34:55:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01302_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 01302_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    7.72    09:45:34.32 +34:30:43.3   5129 5343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.32 +34:30:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:19.274 +38:02:12.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 Second-epoch image center 09:49:19.274 +38:02:12.60 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0581 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 09:49:21.141 +38:02:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:49:05.463 +38:00:01.89 Second-epoch image center 09:49:21.141 +38:02:17.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0638 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:49:19.274 +38:02:12.60 Second-epoch second image center 09:49:21.141 +38:02:17.62 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00628 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E1jzbsyhuf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oo2rVas4yz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8cP36tVRAY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gp32QQwmc2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits and wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec +31.9971 to +43.3850 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec 31.9971 to 43.3850 deg Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3545 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.803100 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.803100 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.60
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 40745 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec +31.9971 to +43.3850 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3395 to 157.6198 deg, Dec 31.9971 to 43.3850 deg Loaded 5394 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3545 out of 3992 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3992 out of 40745 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits (aperture=5.0) Read 40814 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.3396 to 157.6197 deg, Dec +32.0331 to +43.3967 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.3396 to 157.6197 deg, Dec 32.0331 to 43.3967 deg Loaded 5381 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3541 out of 3990 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3990 out of 40814 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.0 pix LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 2.0 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 2.0 pix fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 2.0 pix wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 2.0 pix wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 15.6 mag. LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 15.0 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 15.0 mag. fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.E1jzbsyhuf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1991, passed=40726 Got 40726 stars (including 38650 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40726 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 926 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40287 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40289 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=231 n_q2=212 n_q3=243 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Oo2rVas4yz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits 570.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2016, passed=40792 Got 40792 stars (including 38709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40792 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 939 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40421 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 939 stars left (next iteration limit 1032) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits N_match=939 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=233 n_q2=208 n_q3=246 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227 The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits -region wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.8cP36tVRAY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=892, passed=27873 Got 27873 stars (including 26941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27873 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27578 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27580 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27580 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=231 n_q2=270 n_q3=194 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.Gp32QQwmc2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=895, passed=27815 Got 27815 stars (including 26872 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27815 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27365 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27364 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27364 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=229 n_q2=268 n_q3=191 n_q4=252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.064 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/wcs_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:44:28.30 +34:08:31.8: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:20:07.46 +32:51:07.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:40:45.04 +41:49:48.2: 14.63 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:41:17.27 +41:42:08.0: 13.77 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:18.5: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:20:07.46 +32:51:07.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:07.46 +32:51:07.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:44:28.30 +34:08:31.8: 14.44 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:44:28.30 +34:08:31.8: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2943 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:41:17.27 +41:42:08.0: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:34:51.33 +39:37:38.6: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:40:45.04 +41:49:48.2: 14.35 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:17.27 +41:42:08.0: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0098 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:45.04 +41:49:48.2: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6840 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:25:40.35 +38:35:55.7: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:18.5: 12.95 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:36.02 +36:33:18.5: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1423 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:34:51.33 +39:37:38.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:51.33 +39:37:38.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4075 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:25:40.35 +38:35:55.7: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:25:40.35 +38:35:55.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7001 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:03:31.33 +35:56:47.7: 13.93 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:09:15.40 +34:58:15.1: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:10:08.57 +41:03:29.3: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7: 16.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:22:39.67 +40:00:39.0: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 09:57:08.97 +37:04:02.3: 15.10 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:03:31.33 +35:56:47.7: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:03:31.33 +35:56:47.7: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1535 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-46-59_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0236.fits at 10:24:02.72 +37:43:50.8: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:09:15.40 +34:58:15.1: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:10:08.57 +41:03:29.3: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:09:15.40 +34:58:15.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.0697 delta=-0.74 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:08.57 +41:03:29.3: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=14.1143 delta=-0.70 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:22:39.67 +40:00:39.0: 15.08 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 09:57:08.97 +37:04:02.3: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:22:39.67 +40:00:39.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7612 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:57:08.97 +37:04:02.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7466 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_23-47-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0237.fits at 10:24:02.72 +37:43:50.8: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:24:02.72 +37:43:50.8: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8373 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54395.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52803_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 52803_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.67    09:40:44.99 +41:49:48.7   5890 0958   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.71    09:40:45.08 +41:49:47.7   5893 0959   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52805_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 52805_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.27    09:44:28.25 +34:08:31.6   5251 5572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.31    09:44:28.34 +34:08:32.0   5255 5573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52806_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 52806_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.02    09:41:17.26 +41:42:07.9   5826 1033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.00    09:41:17.28 +41:42:08.1   5829 1034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52808_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 52808_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.37    10:26:09.88 +39:10:20.6   0534 2033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 10:26:09.90 +39:10:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52809_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 52809_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.28    10:22:35.37 +36:10:18.7   0681 3901   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 10:22:35.41 +36:10:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52952_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 52952_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    10.96    10:20:07.47 +32:51:07.7   0685 5947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    10.94    10:20:07.45 +32:51:07.7   0689 5948   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53019_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53019_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    11.76    09:39:43.63 +42:03:11.4   6013 0827   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:39:43.62 +42:03:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53184_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53184_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    12.49    09:18:36.26 +36:47:40.9   8464 4016   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:18:36.25 +36:47:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53290_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53290_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    12.77    09:24:16.41 +36:36:18.8   7773 4139   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:24:16.42 +36:36:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53344_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53344_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.22    09:46:59.43 +35:13:33.1   4976 4902   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:46:59.42 +35:13:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53356_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53356_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    13.14    09:59:36.02 +36:33:18.4   3496 3994   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.14    09:59:36.03 +36:33:18.5   3499 3995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53415_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53415_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.27    09:23:23.39 +33:26:45.0   7901 6059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:23:23.42 +33:26:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53441_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53441_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.28    09:54:05.60 +41:18:23.5   4373 1193   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:54:05.62 +41:18:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53494_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53494_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    13.44    09:34:51.32 +39:37:38.7   6523 2306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.38    09:34:51.34 +39:37:38.6   6526 2307   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53520_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53520_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.42    10:02:58.00 +37:52:27.3   3171 3167   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 10:02:58.01 +37:52:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53569_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53569_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.90    10:18:28.30 +37:15:32.9   1277 3319   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 10:18:28.42 +37:15:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53603_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53603_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    13.69    09:25:40.27 +38:35:55.7   7595 2934   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.71    09:25:40.42 +38:35:55.6   7598 2935   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53619_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53619_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.06    09:13:12.37 +40:52:41.3   9035 1517   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:13:12.50 +40:52:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53650_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53650_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.80    09:12:53.81 +35:30:45.6   9195 4778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:12:53.87 +35:30:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53673_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53673_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.80    09:48:35.84 +33:25:22.9   4715 5981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:48:36.00 +33:25:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53693_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53693_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.93    09:27:33.20 +42:47:04.1   7383 0400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:27:33.20 +42:47:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53726_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53726_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.97    10:03:18.17 +41:18:50.4   3334 1097   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 10:03:18.21 +41:18:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53866_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53866_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.00    09:32:02.63 +40:01:52.7   6857 2068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:32:02.63 +40:01:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53871_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53871_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.06    10:25:27.52 +39:06:03.8   0611 2090   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 10:25:27.65 +39:06:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53911_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53911_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.38    09:57:02.45 +32:58:24.1   3631 6182   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:57:02.59 +32:58:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53950_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53950_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.22    10:02:55.91 +37:52:06.0   3175 3171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 10:02:55.93 +37:52:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53966_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53966_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.00    10:03:34.50 +40:38:00.5   3263 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 10:03:34.50 +40:38:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53980_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 53980_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.17    10:03:31.33 +35:56:46.5   2986 4316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.14    10:03:31.34 +35:56:48.9   2990 4317   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54017_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 54017_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.97    09:52:26.01 +37:56:03.7   4421 3234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:52:26.00 +37:56:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54029_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 54029_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.22    10:09:15.31 +34:58:15.4   2220 4831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    13.98    10:09:15.49 +34:58:14.8   2223 4832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54141_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 54141_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.31    10:10:08.56 +41:03:28.8   2539 1164   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.03    10:10:08.59 +41:03:29.8   2543 1165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54266_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 54266_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.76    09:50:57.82 +43:08:07.4   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54291_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 54291_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.58    10:24:24.97 +42:16:04.4   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54337_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 54337_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.69    09:57:08.95 +37:04:02.6   3816 3711   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.87    09:57:08.99 +37:04:02.0   3820 3712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54367_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 54367_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.76    10:22:39.71 +40:00:39.9   1019 1593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.76    10:22:39.63 +40:00:38.1   1022 1595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54395_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 Preparing report for the candidate 54395_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54423_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 54423_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 18.17532    2461209.67532    14.83    10:24:02.64 +37:43:51.4   0646 2937   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0090.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    14.84    10:24:02.79 +37:43:50.3   0649 2939   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06169_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 06169_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    7.98    09:45:34.31 +34:30:43.0   5129 5343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:45:34.32 +34:30:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 26776_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 26776_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    10.51    09:12:17.93 +41:52:39.3   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 06076_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 06076_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    11.47    09:39:25.60 +34:14:53.0   5886 5536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:39:25.60 +34:14:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07716_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 The candidate 07716_fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 06 18.17576    2461209.67576    8.57    09:53:43.16 +34:55:35.3   4137 5031   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_232235_TTUQ1b1x1_1614061_8n9kBSOt/fd_LMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_23-12-55_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0091.fits **** FOUND 09:53:43.16 +34:55:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 10s Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7 ########### Completed LMi-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7 ################################################################################### 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 09:45:10.56 +34:50:46.7 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.67532017 -observatory V36 07:30:58.14 +22:22:58.2 Mercury (0.7mag) 08:31:57.97 +20:56:28.6 Venus (-4.0mag) 03:18:44.46 +17:49:36.6 Mars (1.3mag) 07:56:55.46 +21:09:19.0 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:58.63 +03:02:31.4 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:02:32.30 +20:32:06.1 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:38.02 +00:19:26.0 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:43.86 -23:08:28.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 08:46:01.75 +19:13:02.6 Moon (-9.1mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 18 00:13 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.67532017: 07:56:51.71 +21:09:30.2 Io (6.2mag) 07:56:46.56 +21:09:48.7 Europa (6.3mag) 07:57:08.53 +21:08:40.9 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:56:56.53 +21:09:22.2 Callisto (6.9mag) 07:56:37.32 +20:46:51.0 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:56:57.44 +21:09:13.3 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:56:20.37 +20:58:07.6 Elara (17.6mag) 07:59:35.55 +21:15:33.3 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:03:03.06 +21:11:51.0 Carme (18.9mag) 00:52:02.61 +03:02:56.7 Titan (8.6mag) 00:51:54.87 +03:02:30.3 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:52:17.40 +03:05:01.3 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:52:10.27 +03:02:46.0 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:52:28.43 +03:03:00.9 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 18 00:13 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461209.67532017: 17:28:54.61 -35:35:32.9 JWST 20:12:49.57 -06:45:22.3 Chandra 18:50:33.57 -16:23:16.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 18 00:13 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461209.67532017 -observatory V36 18:36:03.76 -33:20:04.5 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:03:23.07 -67:59:54.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:52:45.25 +32:06:12.9 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:10:46.14 +15:45:45.8 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 22:51:08.37 -39:44:22.5 16.0mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:09:51.90 +31:56:00.7 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:46:12.83 +27:00:39.1 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:37:11.64 +30:42:50.4 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:56:06.68 +04:21:46.4 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:21:37.32 +21:42:17.6 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:16:05.77 -11:03:13.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:09:42.87 +67:04:46.7 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:21:32.59 -07:42:25.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:17:01.99 +80:39:40.5 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:24:49.88 +64:40:30.3 17.8mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:02:06.85 +28:38:51.5 14.0mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:29:47.37 +14:17:58.6 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:05:23.39 +34:01:15.3 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:28:00.67 -15:08:17.5 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:15:08.23 +32:46:44.3 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:32:10.10 +52:08:35.0 17.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:55:52.79 -11:21:14.7 15.0mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:32:53.74 +23:09:41.4 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:40:00.06 +04:35:36.6 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:53:32.04 +77:02:28.4 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:17:05.15 +44:04:41.9 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:14:11.49 -00:32:39.6 16.6mag A/2026 E1 20:41:34.08 -09:37:27.2 8.2mag 10P/Tempel 11:04:44.55 -01:09:19.1 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:27:05.19 +26:56:39.5 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:21:15.43 +20:51:29.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:34:58.40 -05:47:45.5 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:15:53.12 +34:11:35.3 17.2mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:33:24.16 +18:23:21.0 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:41:41.79 +06:54:20.6 15.8mag 88P/Howell 05:26:41.16 +30:50:22.0 15.4mag 93P/Lovas 03:11:54.04 +29:05:38.0 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:14:33.29 +32:34:02.2 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:07:44.70 +10:23:30.0 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos 04:15:30.45 +19:51:49.6 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:53:20.37 +19:27:43.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 06:39:04.38 +17:17:33.5 15.9mag 141P/Machholz 06:42:26.48 +17:53:55.6 15.9mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:42:47.79 +17:10:09.8 12.7mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:04:28.87 -23:23:49.1 16.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 04:14:58.64 +27:34:28.6 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:33:48.43 +04:56:18.6 16.3mag 169P/NEAT 00:44:56.63 +04:19:47.1 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:45:04.90 -08:08:06.4 16.6mag 235P/LINEAR 07:57:04.43 +34:59:17.0 17.7mag 240P/NEAT 00:58:45.43 +01:52:44.6 16.1mag 260P/McNaught 04:31:56.35 +34:10:10.1 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:45:56.21 +01:21:09.2 17.9mag 320P/McNaught 15:11:13.96 +07:39:33.0 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:15:17.70 +20:27:57.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:16:13.81 +40:58:05.6 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 18 00:13 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 18 00:13 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 18 00:13 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 12:27:47.187 +13:03:22.54 AT 2026ott 2026-05-19.03 20.15 12:22:38.942 +08:51:07.24 AT 2026ots 2026-05-19.02 20.44 09:46:20.889 +09:01:23.97 AT 2026otr 2026-05-18.96 20.1 22:34:44.197 +27:06:25.62 AT 2026otq 2026-06-09.56 18.841 00:15:02.869 -38:28:54.72 AT 2026otp 2026-05-22.42 20.11 23:31:16.630 -35:03:18.75 AT 2026oto 2026-05-04.41 19.11 12:25:14.599 +12:58:16.51 AT 2026otn 2026-05-19.03 20.12 10:04:42.371 +12:40:27.29 AT 2026otm 2026-05-04.99 20.5 18:56:24.084 -24:59:43.12 AT 2026otl 2026-06-07.38 18.4151 14:25:58.906 -19:09:39.58 AT 2026otk 2026-06-09.32 19.3712 16:32:34.784 -13:42:09.08 AT 2026otj 2026-05-22.23 22.76 01:51:40.895 +18:21:06.04 AT 2026oti 2026-06-06.48 18.6484 00:00:06.428 +20:53:35.17 AT 2026oth 2026-06-09.47 20.2357 00:28:14.152 +32:16:04.97 AT 2026otg 2026-06-06.47 20.084 19:34:17.664 -12:11:29.15 AT 2026otf 2026-06-05.42 19.9617 13:53:56.659 +06:57:27.66 AT 2026ote 2026-06-05.32 20.3259 20:18:10.019 +06:04:43.69 AT 2026otd 2026-06-05.43 20.4063 22:17:48.869 +03:46:37.28 AT 2026otc 2026-06-05.45 20.2117 13:46:37.393 +66:54:16.51 AT 2026otb 2026-06-06.37 19.239 10:21:58.883 +19:58:08.57 AT 2026ota 2026-06-09.26 18.926 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 18 00:13 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 86 C