This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.4039 2461208.9039 12.10 22:49:42.05 +02:04:15.4
72.95123 -48.62316 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.198 Ampella -0 -1 1 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:49:42.05 +02:04:15.4: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:49:42.05 +02:04:15.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.9039,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.4039 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.4039 2461208.9039 12.79 23:11:12.86 +01:21:25.0
78.64355 -52.67524 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 -0 0 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:11:12.86 +01:21:25.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:11:12.86 +01:21:25.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.9039,12.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.4039 12.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.4039 2461208.9039 12.93 22:53:46.61 +06:15:34.6
78.14602 -46.12998 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 5.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.690 Wratislavia 0 -1 1 13.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:53:46.61 +06:15:34.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:53:46.61 +06:15:34.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.9039,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.4039 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.4039 2461208.9039 13.70 23:32:00.11 +02:07:28.4
86.59810 -55.04298 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 5.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.338 Budrosa 0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:32:00.11 +02:07:28.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:32:00.11 +02:07:28.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.9039,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.4039 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.4039 2461208.9039 13.84 23:27:40.93 +01:19:33.8
84.25690 -55.12885 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 5.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora -0 -2 2 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:27:40.93 +01:19:33.8: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:27:40.93 +01:19:33.8: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.9039,13.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.4039 13.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.4039 2461208.9039 14.30 23:32:27.94 +06:09:14.9
90.18040 -51.62471 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.170 Maria 1 -1 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:32:27.94 +06:09:14.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:32:27.94 +06:09:14.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.9039,14.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.4039 14.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.4039 2461208.9039 14.29 23:02:11.77 +05:31:43.8
79.89065 -48.00241 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 5.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.713 Luscinia -1 -1 1 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:02:11.77 +05:31:43.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:02:11.77 +05:31:43.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.9039,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.4039 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.59977711 23.12.2025 02:23:30.742 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
First image: 2461032.59977711 23.12.2025 02:23:30.742 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Last image: 2461208.90411584 17.06.2026 09:41:45.609 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7714
Objects passed selection criteria: 7709
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7328.5
Average stars matched: 7095.25 (96.8172 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113132 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 04:43:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.59977711 23.12.2025 02:23:30.742 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
First image: 2461032.59977711 23.12.2025 02:23:30.742 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Last image: 2461208.90411584 17.06.2026 09:41:45.609 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 55
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 39 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41533
Objects passed selection criteria: 41456
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39017.5
Average stars matched: 37708 (96.6438 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141676 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 04:46:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.90361645
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits'
wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:27.665 +05:59:45.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:36.737 +06:02:49.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:27.665 +05:59:45.55
Second-epoch image center 23:08:36.737 +06:02:49.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0634 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.892 +06:03:17.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:27.665 +05:59:45.55
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.892 +06:03:17.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0726 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:36.737 +06:02:49.43
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:37.892 +06:03:17.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00918 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D5lqpFBEy9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Fbb5u3C9N
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b8uYvel4eN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3v20fWU4re
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1169 to 355.0995 deg, Dec +0.7075 to +11.2779 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1169 to 355.0995 deg, Dec 0.7075 to 11.2779 deg
Loaded 4892 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4030 out of 4219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4219 out of 7373 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.932700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.932700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1169 to 355.0995 deg, Dec +0.7075 to +11.2779 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1169 to 355.0995 deg, Dec 0.7075 to 11.2779 deg
Loaded 4892 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4030 out of 4219 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4219 out of 7373 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 7386 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1394 to 355.1046 deg, Dec +0.7018 to +11.2700 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1394 to 355.1046 deg, Dec 0.7018 to 11.2700 deg
Loaded 4878 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4013 out of 4213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4213 out of 7386 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.1 pix Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
2.7 pix fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
15.2 mag. Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.D5lqpFBEy9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=502, passed=7373
Got 7373 stars (including 6860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7234 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=250 n_q2=279 n_q3=205 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits -region wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0Fbb5u3C9N (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=520, passed=7386
Got 7386 stars (including 6858 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.265 n_q1=249 n_q2=283 n_q3=200 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b8uYvel4eN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, passed=7383
Got 7383 stars (including 7038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7383 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7259 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits N_match=952 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=231 n_q2=218 n_q3=264 n_q4=239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3v20fWU4re (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, passed=7364
Got 7364 stars (including 7009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.4 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=228 n_q2=219 n_q3=265 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.135
ref2=Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.173
new1=fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits sigma_overall=0.292 worst_q_ratio=1.088
new2=fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.284 worst_q_ratio=1.092
reference average sigma_overall=0.332 worst_q_ratio=1.154
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044_astrometric_residuals.png (954 matched stars from wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258_astrometric_residuals.png (952 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:08:13.49 +07:41:45.3: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:49:42.05 +02:04:15.4: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:49:42.05 +02:04:15.4: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:08:13.49 +07:41:45.3: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:08:13.49 +07:41:45.3: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3200 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20506.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20470_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 20470_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:23.02 +02:41:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20496_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 20496_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:12:16.82 +06:35:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20506_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 20506_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 20531_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01781_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 01781_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:20:32.50 +08:55:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00547_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 00547_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:39.19 +10:32:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Psc-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
22:49:42.05 +02:04:15.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:27.665 +05:59:45.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:36.737 +06:02:49.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:27.665 +05:59:45.55
Second-epoch image center 23:08:36.737 +06:02:49.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0634 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:08:37.892 +06:03:17.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:08:27.665 +05:59:45.55
Second-epoch image center 23:08:37.892 +06:03:17.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0726 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:08:36.737 +06:02:49.43
Second-epoch second image center 23:08:37.892 +06:03:17.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00918 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p7WSx4UvX3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CdMLWC9Jez
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g392RdEfEW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NY9ajlKS18
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits and wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1169 to 355.1029 deg, Dec +0.7061 to +11.2840 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1169 to 355.1029 deg, Dec 0.7061 to 11.2840 deg
Loaded 4900 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3843 out of 4303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4303 out of 42351 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42351 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1169 to 355.1029 deg, Dec +0.7061 to +11.2840 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1169 to 355.1029 deg, Dec 0.7061 to 11.2840 deg
Loaded 4900 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3843 out of 4303 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4303 out of 42351 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 42087 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 339.1368 to 355.1046 deg, Dec +0.6946 to +11.2732 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 339.1368 to 355.1046 deg, Dec 0.6946 to 11.2732 deg
Loaded 4882 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3842 out of 4301 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4301 out of 42087 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.1 pix Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
2.6 pix fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
15.3 mag. Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p7WSx4UvX3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1983, passed=42337
Got 42337 stars (including 40275 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42337 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 941 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41552 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=246 n_q2=266 n_q3=216 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits -region wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CdMLWC9Jez (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1958, passed=42076
Got 42076 stars (including 40044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41309 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41310 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.283 n_q1=245 n_q2=270 n_q3=209 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits -region wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g392RdEfEW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1701, passed=36598
Got 36598 stars (including 34835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36598 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36048 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.274 n_q1=225 n_q2=217 n_q3=259 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NY9ajlKS18 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1349, passed=36146
Got 36146 stars (including 34749 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35670 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35669 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=228 n_q2=218 n_q3=257 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-02_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0258.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_044217_TTUQ1b1x1_3755100_qXwRE3qf/wcs_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-07-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:14:09.60 +07:43:43.0: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:01:21.41 +07:22:31.7: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:04:19.91 +10:23:58.6: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:11:12.86 +01:21:25.0: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:54:46.51 +07:16:52.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:53:46.61 +06:15:34.6: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:25:31.66 +08:11:56.8: 14.59 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:33:41.02 +10:39:41.6: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:11:12.86 +01:21:25.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:14:09.60 +07:43:43.0: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:54:46.51 +07:16:52.4: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:01:21.41 +07:22:31.7: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:04:19.91 +10:23:58.6: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:53:46.61 +06:15:34.6: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:25:31.66 +08:11:56.8: 14.65 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:14:09.60 +07:43:43.0: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4667 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:21.41 +07:22:31.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5900 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:54:46.51 +07:16:52.4: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6020 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:04:19.91 +10:23:58.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6063 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:25:31.66 +08:11:56.8: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5752 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:32:00.11 +02:07:28.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:33:41.02 +10:39:41.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:41.02 +10:39:41.6: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2863 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:32:00.11 +02:07:28.4: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:27:40.93 +01:19:33.8: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:12:31.33 +09:47:47.4: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:53:39.63 +04:13:45.3: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:52:34.45 +07:40:37.3: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:54:51.38 +06:09:40.6: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:42:30.85 +09:56:20.7: 14.36 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:27:40.93 +01:19:33.8: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:52:34.45 +07:40:37.3: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:12:31.33 +09:47:47.4: 14.01 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:54:51.38 +06:09:40.6: 14.14 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:53:39.63 +04:13:45.3: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:52:34.45 +07:40:37.3: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0696 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:12:31.33 +09:47:47.4: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9738 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:54:51.38 +06:09:40.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1920 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:53:39.63 +04:13:45.3: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9894 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:00:45.64 +10:17:13.2: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:42:30.85 +09:56:20.7: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:30.85 +09:56:20.7: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3110 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:00:45.64 +10:17:13.2: 14.14 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:00:45.64 +10:17:13.2: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1840 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:52:29.91 +10:09:47.3: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:42:33.56 +05:42:08.0: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:02:11.77 +05:31:43.8: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:32:27.94 +06:09:14.9: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:50:14.98 +05:46:39.3: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:52:29.91 +10:09:47.3: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:32:27.94 +06:09:14.9: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:42:33.56 +05:42:08.0: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:02:11.77 +05:31:43.8: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:52:29.91 +10:09:47.3: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5510 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:33.56 +05:42:08.0: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2706 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:38:41.28 +08:35:06.0: 14.71 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:50:14.98 +05:46:39.3: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:50:14.98 +05:46:39.3: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5363 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:38:41.28 +08:35:06.0: 14.83 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:41.28 +08:35:06.0: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5760 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:43:58.61 +09:19:18.6: 14.84 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:40:03.53 +08:13:37.7: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:45:44.80 +11:11:16.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:43:58.61 +09:19:18.6: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:40:03.53 +08:13:37.7: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:58.61 +09:19:18.6: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5283 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:03.53 +08:13:37.7: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6843 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:43:09.20 +05:30:23.1: 14.96 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:45:44.80 +11:11:16.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:45:44.80 +11:11:16.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:43:09.20 +05:30:23.1: 15.21 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:09.20 +05:30:23.1: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6724 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:40:09.03 +10:03:21.2: 15.60 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:39:25.94 +09:12:27.5: 15.00 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:02:40.03 +08:26:31.0: 15.06 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:40:09.03 +10:03:21.2: 15.19 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:09.03 +10:03:21.2: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.6186 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:39:25.94 +09:12:27.5: 14.58 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:25.94 +09:12:27.5: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5498 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:27:14.31 +09:25:04.2: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:02:40.03 +08:26:31.0: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:02:40.03 +08:26:31.0: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7903 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:27:14.31 +09:25:04.2: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:27:14.31 +09:25:04.2: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7517 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:41:52.15 +09:13:42.1: 15.06 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:44:22.60 +08:14:43.4: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:55:12.64 +08:11:45.6: 15.76 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:41:52.15 +09:13:42.1: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.08 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:52.15 +09:13:42.1: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6944 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:44:22.60 +08:14:43.4: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.80 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:44:22.60 +08:14:43.4: ref_mag=14.80 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7554 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:06:01.61 +06:14:18.4: 15.68 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:55:12.64 +08:11:45.6: 15.49 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.59 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:55:12.64 +08:11:45.6: ref_mag=15.59 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.8040 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:06:01.61 +06:14:18.4: 14.94 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:01.61 +06:14:18.4: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7985 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:43:20.94 +07:35:15.3: 15.05 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:40:01.88 +06:45:41.0: 15.01 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:41:19.57 +07:38:57.3: 14.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:43:20.94 +07:35:15.3: 15.41 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:40:01.88 +06:45:41.0: 15.11 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:43:20.94 +07:35:15.3: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7254 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:01.88 +06:45:41.0: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7901 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:42:03.58 +08:02:31.2: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:41:19.57 +07:38:57.3: 14.74 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:41:19.57 +07:38:57.3: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7895 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:42:03.58 +08:02:31.2: 14.82 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:42:03.58 +08:02:31.2: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6772 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:40:26.24 +07:48:06.6: 14.68 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:52:40.62 +10:15:50.7: 15.26 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 23:01:25.37 +06:17:27.0: 14.86 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:52:40.62 +10:15:50.7: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:40:26.24 +07:48:06.6: 15.00 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:52:40.62 +10:15:50.7: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.8164 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:40:26.24 +07:48:06.6: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5078 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-23-30_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0044.fits at 22:38:57.89 +06:34:19.2: 14.82 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 23:01:25.37 +06:17:27.0: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:01:25.37 +06:17:27.0: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8179 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-24-40_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0045.fits at 22:38:57.89 +06:34:19.2: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 22:38:57.89 +06:34:19.2: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8438 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53251.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53260.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53492.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53654.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54125.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54204.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52917_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 52917_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52919_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 52919_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 52924_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 52935_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53089_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53089_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:49:42.05 +02:04:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53118_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53118_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:48:45.90 +07:48:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53168_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53168_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53251_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 53251_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53260_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 53260_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53267_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53267_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:01:44.71 +04:28:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53334_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53334_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53346_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53346_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:13:21.37 +02:39:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53357_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53357_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:31:17.17 +09:46:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53373_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53373_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:58:26.26 +09:48:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53492_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 53492_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53563_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53563_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:41:51.91 +10:31:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53654_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 53654_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53796_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53796_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53917_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 53917_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54025_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54025_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:43:46.03 +10:55:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54057_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54057_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54069_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54069_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54074_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:11:45.50 +04:43:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54081_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54081_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54112_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54112_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54125_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 54125_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54146_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54146_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54204_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
Preparing report for the candidate 54204_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54243_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54243_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54248_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54248_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54254_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54254_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54303_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54303_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54320_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54320_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54348_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54348_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54350_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54350_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54365_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54365_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54366_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54366_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54384_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54384_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54386_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54386_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54397_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54397_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54398_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54398_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54399_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54399_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54407_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54407_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54410_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54410_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54414_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54414_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54427_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54427_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54437_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54437_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54453_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54453_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54457_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54457_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54475_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54475_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54480_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 54480_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08932_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 08932_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:20:32.50 +08:55:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02622_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259
The candidate 02622_fd_Psc-07-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_04-41-45_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0259 did not pass the final checks
