######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-11-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-11-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 68621 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 68621 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits

renamed 'UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits_preview.png'
UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 438.2398
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 482.5375
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 988.5726
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.4214
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 989.4646
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 440.1681
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.25578
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.3799991607666 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.4899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.72334131
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:28.570 +46:02:10.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:28.570 +46:02:10.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0892 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:24.880 +46:01:48.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:24.880 +46:01:48.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:28.570 +46:02:10.90
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:24.880 +46:01:48.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01235 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YLEtceK8jq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3UDQiB4iFc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C0X90gmAP2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2HQEBJ9nq3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 168.5377 to 192.8200 deg, Dec +39.5500 to +51.5816 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 168.5377 to 192.8200 deg, Dec 39.5500 to 51.5816 deg
Loaded 4074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2781 out of 2891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2891 out of 6698 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.980100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.980100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6698 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 168.5377 to 192.8200 deg, Dec +39.5500 to +51.5816 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 168.5377 to 192.8200 deg, Dec 39.5500 to 51.5816 deg
Loaded 4074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2781 out of 2891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2891 out of 6698 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (aperture=6.7)
Read 6611 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.6881 to 192.2402 deg, Dec +40.2976 to +51.2870 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.6881 to 192.2402 deg, Dec 40.2976 to 51.2870 deg
Loaded 3720 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2822 out of 2916 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2916 out of 6611 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits (aperture=6.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.4 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
15.2 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
15.2 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YLEtceK8jq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=384, passed=6698
Got 6698 stars (including 6310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 647 to 709 (Dec 39.5 to 51.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 647 to 709 (Dec 39.5 to 51.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6627 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=257 n_q2=244 n_q3=247 n_q4=221 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.373
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3UDQiB4iFc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=340, passed=6611
Got 6611 stars (including 6267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6611 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6573 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=227 n_q2=277 n_q3=219 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C0X90gmAP2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, passed=5009
Got 5009 stars (including 4693 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5009 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 652 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 652 to 708 (Dec 40.4 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4955 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=204 n_q2=282 n_q3=230 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2HQEBJ9nq3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=323, passed=4968
Got 4968 stars (including 4639 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4968 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=206 n_q2=282 n_q3=226 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.040
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.373
ref2=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.146
new1=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits sigma_overall=0.333 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.040
reference average sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.2595
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (969 matched stars from wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 11:52:31.86 +45:47:17.0: 12.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 11:52:31.86 +45:47:17.0: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:52:31.86 +45:47:17.0: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5140 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21633_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 21633_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 12.51 | 11:52:31.85 +45:47:17.0 | 5626 3329 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 12.52 | 11:52:31.88 +45:47:17.0 | 5620 3326 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.8' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:28.570 +46:02:10.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:28.570 +46:02:10.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0892 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.0' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:24.880 +46:01:48.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:59.723 +46:00:17.32
Second-epoch image center 12:00:24.880 +46:01:48.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0771 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:28.570 +46:02:10.90
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:24.880 +46:01:48.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01235 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PgEQR0H2fN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hVENHnrgUf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mCsZ6bKhWJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gis10VumEG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits and wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 30081 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 168.4661 to 192.8545 deg, Dec +39.5499 to +51.6047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 168.4661 to 192.8545 deg, Dec 39.5499 to 51.6047 deg
Loaded 4090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2669 out of 2891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2891 out of 30081 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.884800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.884800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.67
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 30081 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 168.4661 to 192.8545 deg, Dec +39.5499 to +51.6047 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 168.4661 to 192.8545 deg, Dec 39.5499 to 51.6047 deg
Loaded 4090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2669 out of 2891 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2891 out of 30081 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits (aperture=5.3)
Read 29523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 167.6881 to 192.2892 deg, Dec +40.2976 to +51.3053 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 167.6881 to 192.2892 deg, Dec 40.2976 to 51.3053 deg
Loaded 3734 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2675 out of 2915 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2915 out of 29523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits (aperture=5.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 34 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.3 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
2.5 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
2.4 pix UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
2.3 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
2.3 pix wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PgEQR0H2fN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1274, passed=30061
Got 30061 stars (including 28752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30061 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 647 to 710 (Dec 39.5 to 51.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 647 to 710 (Dec 39.5 to 51.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.537 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=258 n_q2=248 n_q3=240 n_q4=225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.376
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hVENHnrgUf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1282, passed=29510
Got 29510 stars (including 28198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29510 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29281 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 974 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits N_match=974 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=229 n_q2=284 n_q3=208 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.211
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mCsZ6bKhWJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1249, passed=36916
Got 36916 stars (including 35575 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=204 n_q2=268 n_q3=209 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.108
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gis10VumEG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1312, passed=37002
Got 37002 stars (including 35604 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37002 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36018 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=205 n_q2=266 n_q3=211 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.138
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:16:20.78 +45:27:13.8: 14.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:02:23.19 +42:20:50.6: 14.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:15:37.58 +45:32:43.2: 13.94 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 11:56:28.38 +45:18:28.1: 15.08 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 11:54:37.61 +49:18:53.3: 14.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 11:39:50.16 +46:18:41.5: 15.06 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:01:29.70 +43:12:37.4: 14.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:19:42.76 +42:36:43.0: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:00:17.13 +48:11:00.4: 14.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:07:21.55 +43:39:01.6: 14.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:16:20.78 +45:27:13.8: 15.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:16:20.78 +45:27:13.8: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7202 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 11:54:37.61 +49:18:53.3: 14.53 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 11:56:28.38 +45:18:28.1: 14.93 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:54:37.61 +49:18:53.3: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7124 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:56:28.38 +45:18:28.1: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.9522 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:02:23.19 +42:20:50.6: 14.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:23.19 +42:20:50.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5814 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 11:39:50.16 +46:18:41.5: 14.65 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:15:37.58 +45:32:43.2: 14.00 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:07:21.55 +43:39:01.6: 14.55 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:19:42.76 +42:36:43.0: 15.41 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:01:29.70 +43:12:37.4: 14.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:15:37.58 +45:32:43.2: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.3966 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:39:50.16 +46:18:41.5: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8131 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:07:21.55 +43:39:01.6: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3981 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:19:42.76 +42:36:43.0: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8831 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:00:17.13 +48:11:00.4: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:01:29.70 +43:12:37.4: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7809 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.56 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:17.13 +48:11:00.4: ref_mag=14.56 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4042 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 11:55:55.83 +44:57:07.9: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:03:27.92 +42:04:42.2: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:03:48.43 +42:38:09.7: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 12:03:44.47 +45:48:40.8: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_02-18-11_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0318.fits at 11:58:51.53 +44:50:20.8: 14.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 11:55:55.83 +44:57:07.9: 14.15 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:03:27.92 +42:04:42.2: 14.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:55.83 +44:57:07.9: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0175 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:03:48.43 +42:38:09.7: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:27.92 +42:04:42.2: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8466 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:48.43 +42:38:09.7: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5155 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 12:03:44.47 +45:48:40.8: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:44.47 +45:48:40.8: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7098 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_02-36-55_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0330.fits at 11:58:51.53 +44:50:20.8: 14.86 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:58:51.53 +44:50:20.8: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8577 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56945_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56945_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.89 | 12:19:42.79 +42:36:43.4 | 2656 5221 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.88 | 12:19:42.72 +42:36:42.7 | 2649 5217 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56954_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56954_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 15.00 | 11:56:28.30 +45:18:27.5 | 5217 3630 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.92 | 11:56:28.46 +45:18:28.8 | 5210 3626 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56958_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56958_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.76 | 12:16:20.83 +45:27:13.4 | 3108 3516 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.69 | 12:16:20.73 +45:27:14.3 | 3102 3512 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56965_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56965_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.66 | 12:02:23.21 +42:20:50.9 | 4589 5429 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.54 | 12:02:23.17 +42:20:50.4 | 4582 5425 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56967_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56967_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.73 | 12:01:29.68 +43:12:37.6 | 4687 4905 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.85 | 12:01:29.73 +43:12:37.2 | 4680 4901 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56971_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56971_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.82 | 11:54:37.43 +49:18:54.7 | 5355 1202 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.64 | 11:54:37.79 +49:18:52.0 | 5348 1198 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56981_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56981_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.77 | 11:39:50.20 +46:18:42.5 | 6943 2945 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.87 | 11:39:50.13 +46:18:40.4 | 6936 2942 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56984_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56984_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.41 | 12:07:21.55 +43:39:02.2 | 4045 4634 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.39 | 12:07:21.54 +43:39:01.0 | 4038 4631 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56986_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56986_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.39 | 12:15:37.52 +45:32:44.1 | 3187 3464 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.41 | 12:15:37.63 +45:32:42.3 | 3181 3460 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56991_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56991_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.41 | 12:00:17.13 +48:11:00.6 | 4801 1897 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.40 | 12:00:17.13 +48:11:00.3 | 4794 1893 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56996_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56996_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.05 | 11:55:55.82 +44:57:07.9 | 5279 3844 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 13.99 | 11:55:55.84 +44:57:08.0 | 5272 3840 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56997_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56997_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 13.84 | 12:03:27.93 +42:04:41.6 | 4467 5592 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 13.85 | 12:03:27.91 +42:04:42.7 | 4461 5588 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56998_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 56998_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 13.76 | 11:39:37.67 +45:56:01.6 | 6974 3169 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
**** FOUND 11:39:37.65 +45:56:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58314_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 58314_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 13.51 | 12:03:48.42 +42:38:10.0 | 4430 5253 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 13.53 | 12:03:48.44 +42:38:09.3 | 4424 5249 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58416_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 58416_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 13.69 | 12:03:44.39 +45:48:40.7 | 4446 3331 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 13.73 | 12:03:44.55 +45:48:40.9 | 4440 3327 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58863_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 58863_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 13.82 | 12:07:00.83 +42:38:45.5 | 4067 5240 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
**** FOUND 12:07:00.82 +42:38:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59258_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 59258_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.18 | 12:00:38.82 +43:36:33.8 | 4772 4659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
**** FOUND 12:00:38.82 +43:36:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59508_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 59508_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.31 | 11:53:37.30 +45:47:50.1 | 5505 3324 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59945_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 59945_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.65 | 11:40:48.24 +46:07:16.3 | 6843 3064 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
**** FOUND 11:40:48.29 +46:07:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60062_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 60062_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.51 | 11:42:16.15 +43:30:48.2 | 6789 4651 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60140_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 60140_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.37 | 12:26:47.72 +47:47:42.1 | 2099 2029 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60172_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 60172_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.62 | 12:12:39.71 +42:07:47.2 | 3427 5541 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60860_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 60860_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.69 | 11:58:28.64 +46:59:30.8 | 4985 2612 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60903_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 60903_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.81 | 11:57:27.72 +42:44:43.8 | 5129 5179 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61494_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 61494_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 15.00 | 11:36:58.76 +44:08:30.4 | 7340 4231 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62216_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 62216_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 06 17.22334 | 2461208.72334 | 14.86 | 11:58:51.60 +44:50:20.7 | 4966 3917 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-21-26_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0170.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.86 | 11:58:51.47 +44:50:21.0 | 4960 3913 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62289_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 62289_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.81 | 12:06:44.19 +45:45:34.0 | 4124 3356 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62394_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 62394_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.88 | 12:18:29.71 +43:12:30.7 | 2804 4861 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62429_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 62429_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.88 | 12:09:03.43 +47:19:09.3 | 3899 2409 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63027_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 63027_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.75 | 12:08:59.68 +48:19:08.5 | 3918 1804 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63174_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 63174_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.94 | 12:02:48.78 +42:13:13.4 | 4534 5502 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63606_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 63606_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.81 | 12:13:47.47 +42:51:08.1 | 3316 5098 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64211_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 64211_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.63 | 11:59:29.89 +42:20:17.7 | 4905 5429 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64750_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171
The candidate 64750_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 06 17.22390 | 2461208.72390 | 14.70 | 12:09:57.54 +41:59:51.5 | 3729 5629 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-11-Q2b1x1_002708_TTUQ2b1x1_1406874_R3BNbFmk/UMa-11-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-22-14_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-11-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-11-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461208.72334131 -observatory V36
07:27:37.14 +22:40:51.6 Mercury (0.6mag)
08:27:23.30 +21:12:50.9 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:15:57.22 +17:38:16.2 Mars (1.3mag)
07:56:06.06 +21:11:32.1 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:45.04 +03:01:21.1 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:02:19.23 +20:31:29.2 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:35.71 +00:19:14.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:47.81 -23:08:04.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:49:07.87 +23:17:28.3 Moon (-8.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 17 01:13 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461208.72334131:
07:56:11.14 +21:11:17.8 Io (6.2mag)
07:56:05.43 +21:11:33.0 Europa (6.3mag)
07:56:06.47 +21:11:36.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:55:56.87 +21:12:07.1 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:55:51.23 +20:48:54.2 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:56:04.93 +21:11:36.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:55:35.78 +21:00:33.0 Elara (17.6mag)
07:58:43.49 +21:18:17.7 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:02:16.39 +21:13:58.9 Carme (18.9mag)
00:51:52.73 +03:01:39.4 Titan (8.6mag)
00:51:41.76 +03:01:33.4 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:05.74 +03:03:52.7 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:51:58.89 +03:01:27.6 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:16.05 +03:01:58.9 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 17 01:13 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461208.72334131:
17:28:29.06 -35:37:17.9 JWST
17:53:42.74 +36:01:51.9 Chandra
08:41:19.98 -48:37:05.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 17 01:13 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461208.72334131 -observatory V36
18:36:49.00 -33:16:28.2 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:02:25.97 -68:00:04.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:52:24.07 +32:05:24.4 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:11:08.39 +15:43:53.0 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
22:41:27.53 -41:09:28.2 16.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:10:10.78 +31:54:17.4 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:45:03.65 +27:00:34.2 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:36:27.44 +30:45:02.9 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:55:33.73 +04:19:33.4 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:22:15.41 +21:42:10.5 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:16:22.75 -11:02:48.0 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:10:17.56 +67:01:59.6 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:23:54.48 -07:36:24.9 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:50.56 +80:53:18.7 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:23:24.49 +64:38:14.5 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:00:43.61 +28:34:36.4 13.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:30:28.32 +14:14:04.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:06:12.77 +33:45:17.5 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:27:03.77 -15:12:36.3 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:14:16.04 +32:56:25.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:15.67 +52:12:09.5 17.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:54:55.98 -11:18:14.1 14.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:32:00.80 +23:10:57.5 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:55.41 +04:36:30.5 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:55:41.30 +76:52:59.8 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:15:36.39 +44:01:09.5 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:13:50.76 -00:49:13.9 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:39:52.87 -09:29:26.8 8.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:04:26.79 -01:08:00.3 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:25:37.86 +26:49:25.8 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:19:13.84 +21:08:27.4 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:34:15.34 -05:50:38.4 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:12:47.38 +34:08:29.0 17.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:31:05.21 +18:17:11.9 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:39:46.12 +06:43:12.0 15.7mag 88P/Howell
05:23:38.75 +30:48:25.5 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
03:09:04.72 +28:57:59.2 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:12:14.97 +32:37:18.9 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:06:03.09 +10:47:38.0 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:13:56.31 +19:48:36.5 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:51:27.77 +19:25:59.2 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:35:22.20 +17:26:27.1 15.8mag 141P/Machholz
06:38:38.90 +17:54:07.8 15.7mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:38:18.08 +17:06:23.5 12.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:03:51.45 -23:30:49.7 16.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:11:44.17 +27:14:14.8 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:34:16.51 +04:36:22.9 16.4mag 169P/NEAT
00:42:26.14 +04:09:39.3 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:45:41.92 -08:09:16.3 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR
07:54:57.11 +35:02:37.0 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:56:13.19 +01:27:19.4 16.2mag 260P/McNaught
04:29:14.70 +34:01:12.2 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:41:35.98 +00:26:59.0 17.8mag 320P/McNaught
15:11:34.08 +07:42:34.9 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:14:29.97 +20:29:41.8 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:14:41.03 +41:02:21.6 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 17 01:13 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 17 01:13 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 17 01:13 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
10:59:20.450 +40:48:48.90 AT 2026osi 2026-06-02.17 19.8695
10:57:02.077 +24:20:34.59 AT 2026osh 2026-06-03.20 19.8092
14:46:28.312 +01:33:28.69 AT 2026osg 2026-06-05.29 20.5651
15:08:15.449 -04:43:16.48 SN 2026osf 2026-06-06.32 20.375
14:51:30.247 +22:37:57.23 AT 2026ose 2026-06-03.23 20.5827
17:19:28.178 -01:48:39.65 SN 2026osd 2026-06-07.33 20.757
21:42:45.017 +13:53:40.78 SN 2026osc 2026-06-05.13 18.87
10:04:17.793 +10:47:28.54 AT 2026osb 2026-06-08.89 18.473
17:01:33.332 +50:43:50.85 AT 2026osa 2026-06-07.10 20.02
15:52:00.811 +48:12:41.81 AT 2026orz 2026-06-03.97 19.6
16:57:43.679 +55:34:29.61 SN 2026ory 2026-06-09.06 19.74
17:06:48.379 +56:34:34.28 AT 2026orx 2026-06-09.06 19.96
15:50:02.310 +47:40:40.67 AT 2026orw 2026-06-06.100 20.04
15:13:24.305 +58:43:44.69 AT 2026orv 2026-06-05.81 20.34
16:25:01.930 +43:59:23.83 AT 2026oru 2026-06-08.86 20.51
15:54:39.489 +41:09:29.50 AT 2026ort 2026-06-08.88 18.75
16:16:12.071 +25:03:21.02 AT 2026ors 2026-06-08.83 20.53
17:19:04.503 +56:21:42.34 AT 2026orr 2026-06-08.99 19.83
18:30:49.765 +57:45:58.06 AT 2026orq 2026-06-09.01 19.79
13:40:26.067 -11:21:43.50 AT 2026orp 2026-06-08.28 20.09
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 17 01:13 tns_transients_list.txt