This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2181 2461208.7181 14.36 09:00:18.86 +66:29:23.6
148.07239 37.40300 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:00:18.86 +66:29:23.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:00:18.86 +66:29:23.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:00:18.86 +66:29:23.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.2181* 09 00 18.86 +66 29 23.6 14.4 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7181,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2181 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2181 2461208.7181 14.76 10:16:12.54 +65:39:00.6
144.18610 44.53698 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:16:12.54 +65:39:00.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:16:12.54 +65:39:00.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:16:12.54 +65:39:00.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.2181* 10 16 12.54 +65 39 00.6 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7181,14.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2181 14.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2181 2461208.7181 14.63 10:16:44.34 +65:29:12.0
144.31783 44.68169 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:16:44.34 +65:29:12.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:16:44.34 +65:29:12.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:16:44.34 +65:29:12.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.2181* 10 16 44.34 +65 29 12.0 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7181,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2181 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2181 2461208.7181 13.31 09:42:56.96 +67:18:34.0
144.88217 40.86635 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.8" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:42:56.96 +67:18:34.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:42:56.96 +67:18:34.0: 15.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:42:56.96 +67:18:34.0: 15.89 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.2181* 09 42 56.96 +67 18 34.0 13.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.7181,13.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.2181 13.31CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
First image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Last image: 2461208.71835838 17.06.2026 05:14:16.164 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6262
Objects passed selection criteria: 6250
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5598.25
Average stars matched: 5396.25 (96.3917 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 00:26:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
First image: 2461082.79736027 11.02.2026 07:08:01.927 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Last image: 2461208.71835838 17.06.2026 05:14:16.164 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 24 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 38719
Objects passed selection criteria: 38628
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38329
Average stars matched: 32883.2 (85.7921 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 144144 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 00:28:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 82890 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 82890 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1095.8536
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 515.2716
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1097.1517
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 514.9188
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.05554
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.6599998474121 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.7600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.71777757
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits'
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:58.499 +69:59:04.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:35:58.499 +69:59:04.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0314 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:54.090 +69:59:40.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:35:54.090 +69:59:40.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0381 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:35:58.499 +69:59:04.38
Second-epoch second image center 09:35:54.090 +69:59:40.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01172 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.X8URkXCMYH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TCNbKJwvQH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y8Nzgf8L6s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ateOhvFR5h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.863700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.863700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec +62.9088 to +75.4797 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9949 deg, Dec 62.9088 to 75.4797 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5118 out of 5414 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5414 out of 8779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec +62.9087 to +75.4796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0365 to 171.9944 deg, Dec 62.9087 to 75.4796 deg
Loaded 9303 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5136 out of 5418 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5418 out of 8894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.4 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
2.5 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
14.9 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
14.9 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.X8URkXCMYH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, passed=8779
Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=198 n_q2=294 n_q3=213 n_q4=263 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TCNbKJwvQH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, passed=8894
Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=198 n_q2=284 n_q3=224 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y8Nzgf8L6s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=510, passed=6642
Got 6642 stars (including 6127 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6642 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6599 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=222 n_q2=287 n_q3=210 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ateOhvFR5h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=526, passed=6725
Got 6725 stars (including 6193 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6725 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6677 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.409 n_q1=221 n_q2=288 n_q3=212 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.331
ref2=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.395 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.170
new2=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.392 worst_q_ratio=1.088
reference average sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.3095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:41:28.90 +68:33:56.9: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:40:50.00 +69:50:56.4: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:55:33.16 +70:00:39.1: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:20:37.81 +69:43:04.9: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:53:30.41 +71:24:01.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:10:28.49 +70:03:56.7: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:27:05.25 +71:40:10.5: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:53:30.41 +71:24:01.7: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:41:28.90 +68:33:56.9: 12.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:40:50.00 +69:50:56.4: 12.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:55:33.16 +70:00:39.1: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:20:37.81 +69:43:04.9: 12.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:10:28.49 +70:03:56.7: 12.40 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:27:05.25 +71:40:10.5: 12.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:30.41 +71:24:01.7: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1555 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:41:28.90 +68:33:56.9: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3342 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:40:50.00 +69:50:56.4: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1035 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:55:33.16 +70:00:39.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1479 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:20:37.81 +69:43:04.9: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2183 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:27:05.25 +71:40:10.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2803 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:10:28.49 +70:03:56.7: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2779 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20624_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 20624_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20625_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 20625_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20630_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 20630_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20662_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 20662_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20674_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 20674_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20680_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 20680_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20681_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 20681_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04047_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 04047_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:44:37.32 +68:46:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01377_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 01377_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:39.12 +71:52:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:58.499 +69:59:04.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:35:58.499 +69:59:04.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0314 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 937.7'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:54.090 +69:59:40.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.400 +69:59:16.84
Second-epoch image center 09:35:54.090 +69:59:40.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0381 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:35:58.499 +69:59:04.38
Second-epoch second image center 09:35:54.090 +69:59:40.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01172 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vfL1t8J1fH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JubhEq2Z0h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UjsR3M0rWO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xh7qyO946i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.743500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.743500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec +62.8130 to +75.4851 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7773 to 172.6837 deg, Dec 62.8130 to 75.4851 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4868 out of 5492 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5492 out of 51532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec +62.8134 to +75.4919 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7032 to 172.5255 deg, Dec 62.8134 to 75.4919 deg
Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4857 out of 5495 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5495 out of 51887 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.4 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
2.4 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
15.2 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
15.2 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vfL1t8J1fH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2624, passed=51522
Got 51522 stars (including 48803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51011 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51012 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=207 n_q2=283 n_q3=214 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JubhEq2Z0h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=2687, passed=51868
Got 51868 stars (including 49084 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51868 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51377 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51376 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.329 n_q1=214 n_q2=276 n_q3=217 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UjsR3M0rWO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=2056, passed=47624
Got 47624 stars (including 45481 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46668 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=219 n_q2=275 n_q3=211 n_q4=273 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.171
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xh7qyO946i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2085, passed=47493
Got 47493 stars (including 45318 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47493 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=221 n_q2=273 n_q3=212 n_q4=272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-13-25_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0160.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_002116_TTUQ2b1x1_267336_Rm5Z9WJi/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:55:34.80 +73:45:51.5: 14.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:16:03.29 +70:33:41.9: 14.91 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:11:33.37 +72:08:44.6: 14.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:00:50.78 +68:38:22.1: 14.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:58:25.87 +65:59:37.3: 14.87 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:56:41.75 +70:53:33.1: 14.41 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:11:00.93 +68:52:22.4: 14.27 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:34:29.44 +68:19:45.7: 14.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:02:07.94 +67:16:31.3: 14.67 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:32:24.86 +67:48:40.7: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:11:33.37 +72:08:44.6: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:55:34.80 +73:45:51.5: 14.79 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:02:07.94 +67:16:31.3: 14.44 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:32:24.86 +67:48:40.7: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:58:25.87 +65:59:37.3: 14.69 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:34:29.44 +68:19:45.7: 14.61 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:56:41.75 +70:53:33.1: 14.24 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:16:03.29 +70:33:41.9: 14.96 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:11:33.37 +72:08:44.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4095 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:55:34.80 +73:45:51.5: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5927 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:02:07.94 +67:16:31.3: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5965 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:58:25.87 +65:59:37.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7477 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:32:24.86 +67:48:40.7: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0760 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:34:29.44 +68:19:45.7: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3947 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:00:50.78 +68:38:22.1: 14.48 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:56:41.75 +70:53:33.1: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5174 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:16:03.29 +70:33:41.9: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9129 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:00:50.78 +68:38:22.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5618 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:11:00.93 +68:52:22.4: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:11:00.93 +68:52:22.4: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3050 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:54:26.22 +72:01:36.4: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:59:09.24 +73:11:58.3: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:15:23.69 +72:05:15.3: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:04:54.56 +65:42:03.8: 13.96 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:34:34.43 +69:33:36.4: 14.59 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:47:17.84 +70:51:45.3: 13.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:35:34.51 +67:08:18.6: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:20:33.66 +72:06:33.5: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:52:23.30 +71:13:39.4: 10.48 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:54:26.22 +72:01:36.4: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:59:09.24 +73:11:58.3: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:15:23.69 +72:05:15.3: 13.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:47:17.84 +70:51:45.3: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:35:34.51 +67:08:18.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:34:34.43 +69:33:36.4: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:54:26.22 +72:01:36.4: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8268 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:04:54.56 +65:42:03.8: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:52:23.30 +71:13:39.4: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:15:23.69 +72:05:15.3: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6475 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:35:34.51 +67:08:18.6: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6104 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:04:54.56 +65:42:03.8: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9351 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:20:33.66 +72:06:33.5: 11.50 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:09.24 +73:11:58.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7537 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.49 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:17.84 +70:51:45.3: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2295 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:52:23.30 +71:13:39.4: ref_mag=10.49 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6678 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:34:34.43 +69:33:36.4: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3166 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:20:33.66 +72:06:33.5: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3932 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:06:33.54 +68:25:52.9: 13.97 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:00:18.86 +66:29:23.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:19:42.05 +65:40:17.0: 14.20 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:06:33.54 +68:25:52.9: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:06:33.54 +68:25:52.9: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1542 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:24:07.00 +70:03:10.6: 15.30 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:19:42.05 +65:40:17.0: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:00:18.86 +66:29:23.6: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:19:42.05 +65:40:17.0: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3668 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:16:44.34 +65:29:12.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:16:12.54 +65:39:00.6: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:24:07.00 +70:03:10.6: 15.40 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:24:07.00 +70:03:10.6: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7995 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:16:12.54 +65:39:00.6: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:16:44.34 +65:29:12.0: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 09:42:56.96 +67:18:34.0: 15.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 09:42:56.96 +67:18:34.0: 15.89 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.67 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 09:42:56.96 +67:18:34.0: ref_mag=15.67 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.3026 delta=2.36 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45890.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72604.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out72936.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64507_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64507_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64511_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64511_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64513_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64513_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64527_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64527_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64530_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64530_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64532_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64532_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64536_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64536_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64539_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64539_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64540_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64540_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64541_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64541_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64543_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64543_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64547_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64547_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64550_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64550_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64551_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64551_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64552_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64552_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64555_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64555_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64557_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64557_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64560_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64560_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64562_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 64562_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65778_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 65778_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:18:43.13 +67:14:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66086_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 66086_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:13:06.39 +69:38:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66132_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 66132_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:06:33.91 +73:11:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66504_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 66504_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:54:38.58 +68:36:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66573_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 66573_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:50:43.81 +73:45:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67266_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 67266_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:09:26.33 +69:12:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67382_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 67382_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67407_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 67407_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:08:05.45 +66:23:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67429_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 67429_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67477_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 67477_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:07:01.27 +66:17:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67631_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 67631_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:25:38.44 +71:17:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67738_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 67738_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:46:31.46 +65:55:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67955_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 67955_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:49:15.27 +71:34:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68132_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 68132_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68181_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 68181_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68311_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 68311_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68684_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 68684_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69529_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 69529_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69614_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 69614_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70254_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 70254_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70640_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 70640_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70658_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 70658_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71362_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 71362_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71627_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 71627_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71943_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 71943_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72009_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 72009_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72017_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 72017_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72038_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 72038_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72592_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 72592_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72604_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 72604_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72827_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 72827_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72936_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
Preparing report for the candidate 72936_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73174_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 73174_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 73752_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 73752_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 07628_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:39.11 +71:52:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23914_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161
The candidate 23914_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-14-16_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0161 did not pass the final checks
