This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2084 2461208.7084 9.54 19:23:30.49 -08:23:14.9
29.02516 -10.91297 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.18 Melpomene -1 -0 1 9.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:23:30.49 -08:23:14.9: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:23:30.49 -08:23:14.9: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7084,9.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2084 9.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2084 2461208.7084 11.00 19:28:44.31 -09:56:02.9
28.18234 -12.75093 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.409 Aspasia -1 -0 2 11.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:28:44.31 -09:56:02.9: 14.94 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:28:44.31 -09:56:02.9: 14.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7084,11.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2084 11.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2084 2461208.7084 13.60 19:16:33.34 -13:17:51.5
23.76123 -11.51447 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 9.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.850 Altona 1 -1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:16:33.34 -13:17:51.5: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:16:33.34 -13:17:51.5: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.7084,13.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.2084 13.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2084 2461208.7084 13.22 19:34:59.52 -10:46:29.9
28.08695 -14.50122 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 10.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J193459-1046.5
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.440 V Y 1.630 V 2452612.80000 182.280640000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:34:59.52 -10:46:29.9: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:34:59.52 -10:46:29.9: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J193459-1046.5,2461208.7084,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J193459-1046.5 20260617.2084 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.2084 2461208.7084 12.29 19:30:43.33 -10:53:50.6
27.50759 -13.60774 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 10.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J193043-1053.9
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.750 V Y 1.180 V 2452316.40000 154.879135000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:30:43.33 -10:53:50.6: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:30:43.33 -10:53:50.6: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J193043-1053.9,2461208.7084,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J193043-1053.9 20260617.2084 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461208.70872697 17.06.2026 05:00:24.010 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 10
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10018
Objects passed selection criteria: 10005
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8624.25
Average stars matched: 8421.75 (97.652 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116240 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 00:17:36 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
First image: 2461175.87047248 15.05.2026 08:53:18.822 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Last image: 2461208.70872697 17.06.2026 05:00:24.010 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 155
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 69 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 95900
Objects passed selection criteria: 95734
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 88658.8
Average stars matched: 84082.5 (94.8384 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1932300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Jun 17 00:21:38 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Aql-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aql-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Aql-06-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 85907 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 85907 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.png' -> 'transient_report/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits_preview.png'
Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
renamed 'Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.png' -> 'transient_report/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits_preview.png'
Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1264.1328
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 539.3506
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2100.4142
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 593.8450
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2086.6889
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 593.3310
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.66155
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.8700008392334 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.8299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.70801499
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits'
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:36.433 -09:56:27.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:36.433 -09:56:27.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0885 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:33.344 -09:55:50.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:33.344 -09:55:50.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1049 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:36.433 -09:56:27.58
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:33.344 -09:55:50.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01638 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KoCxPoi95s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vHEKKTNgOk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UMUjQFqeDy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j9Q6Ej2TWL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Loaded 11426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8421 out of 8736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8736 out of 13037 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.07
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.58
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6731 to 303.8334 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6830 deg
Loaded 11426 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8421 out of 8736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8736 out of 13037 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 13026 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6617 to 303.8021 deg, Dec -15.2493 to -4.6640 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6617 to 303.8021 deg, Dec -15.2493 to -4.6640 deg
Loaded 11410 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8436 out of 8760 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8760 out of 13026 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.4 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.4 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
2.4 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.6 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
14.1 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
14.1 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KoCxPoi95s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=759, passed=13037
Got 13037 stars (including 12267 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13037 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 954 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.703 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=269 n_q2=220 n_q3=230 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vHEKKTNgOk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=765, passed=13026
Got 13026 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13026 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=273 n_q2=214 n_q3=232 n_q4=243 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UMUjQFqeDy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7888
Got 7888 stars (including 7340 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7888 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7684 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.797 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=275 n_q2=190 n_q3=236 n_q4=264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.683
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.j9Q6Ej2TWL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=543, passed=7977
Got 7977 stars (including 7430 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7790 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.682 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.426 n_q1=271 n_q2=192 n_q3=237 n_q4=265 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.570 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits sigma_overall=0.580 worst_q_ratio=1.193
new1=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.683
new2=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits sigma_overall=0.523 worst_q_ratio=1.303
reference average sigma_overall=0.575 worst_q_ratio=1.213
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145_astrometric_residuals.png (965 matched stars from wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:28:44.31 -09:56:02.9: 14.94 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:23:30.49 -08:23:14.9: 15.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:40:02.82 -09:48:41.4: 11.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:28:44.31 -09:56:02.9: 14.44 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:28:44.31 -09:56:02.9: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=10.9988 delta=3.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:23:30.49 -08:23:14.9: 15.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:40:02.82 -09:48:41.4: 11.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:02.82 -09:48:41.4: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5416 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20741.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20769.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20731_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 20731_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:37.95 -08:14:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20741_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 20741_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20768_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 20768_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:52.18 -06:58:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20769_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 20769_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20771_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 20771_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:07.42 -12:09:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20776_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 20776_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05760_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 05760_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:28.80 -10:41:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05110_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 05110_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:16.82 -11:14:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03442_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 03442_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:59.62 -12:35:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
19:23:30.49 -08:23:14.9
19:28:44.31 -09:56:02.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:36.433 -09:56:27.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:36.433 -09:56:27.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0885 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Image size: 938.7'x624.5' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:42:33.344 -09:55:50.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:42:53.116 -09:59:49.48
Second-epoch image center 19:42:33.344 -09:55:50.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1049 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:42:36.433 -09:56:27.58
Second-epoch second image center 19:42:33.344 -09:55:50.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01638 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jy0yq4FR59
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BeW5xfNNLT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8SeUbXllvc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SyDRyUUwRd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits and wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 120331 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Loaded 11445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8549 out of 10240 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10240 out of 120331 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.456700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.456700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.73
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.73
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 120331 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6619 to 303.8333 deg, Dec -15.2649 to -4.6698 deg
Loaded 11445 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8549 out of 10240 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10240 out of 120331 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 117743 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 287.6490 to 303.8091 deg, Dec -15.2548 to -4.6551 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 287.6490 to 303.8091 deg, Dec -15.2548 to -4.6551 deg
Loaded 11444 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8582 out of 10248 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10248 out of 117743 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 108 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
2.2 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
2.2 pix Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
14.7 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
14.3 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
14.3 mag. Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jy0yq4FR59 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=9917, passed=120318
Got 120318 stars (including 110246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 120318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 969 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 117791 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits N_match=969 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.563 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.640 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.507 n_q1=282 n_q2=219 n_q3=215 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BeW5xfNNLT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits' -> 'wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=9576, passed=117729
Got 117729 stars (including 108009 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 117729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 959 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 115260 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.553 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.488 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.498 n_q1=276 n_q2=225 n_q3=212 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.143
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8SeUbXllvc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=6089, passed=88065
Got 88065 stars (including 81822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84524 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84528 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.731 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=286 n_q2=219 n_q3=188 n_q4=279 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.586
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SyDRyUUwRd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=6315, passed=89506
Got 89506 stars (including 83064 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 89506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013038 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010430 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.2 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.570 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.715 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.415 n_q1=279 n_q2=221 n_q3=187 n_q4=285 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.403
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits -region wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-59-22_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0144.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-17_CI_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_001507_TTUQ2b1x1_3787379_fbZQHzfs/wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aql-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:21:10.96 -10:47:39.3: 14.11 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:45:23.93 -12:26:59.3: 14.02 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:52:16.06 -06:52:51.9: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:19:44.76 -06:35:46.9: 13.68 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:36:53.95 -11:33:39.4: 14.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:27:05.40 -07:33:19.6: 13.90 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:22:33.91 -12:08:60.0: 13.45 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:39:11.02 -09:59:19.5: 14.06 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:51:21.27 -13:33:35.6: 13.98 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:36:53.95 -11:33:39.4: 14.20 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:27:05.40 -07:33:19.6: 13.85 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:52:16.06 -06:52:51.9: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:45:23.93 -12:26:59.3: 13.97 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:21:10.96 -10:47:39.3: 14.06 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:19:44.76 -06:35:46.9: 13.62 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:39:11.02 -09:59:19.5: 14.00 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:36:06.87 -06:38:38.4: 14.11 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:22:33.91 -12:08:60.0: 13.45 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.21 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:53.95 -11:33:39.4: ref_mag=14.21 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0222 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:27:05.40 -07:33:19.6: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.7672 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:52:16.06 -06:52:51.9: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9656 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:44.76 -06:35:46.9: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7616 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:23.93 -12:26:59.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0198 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:10.96 -10:47:39.3: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7762 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:11.02 -09:59:19.5: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.0571 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:33.91 -12:08:60.0: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5771 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:51:21.27 -13:33:35.6: 14.13 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:21.27 -13:33:35.6: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1877 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:36:06.87 -06:38:38.4: 13.96 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:06.87 -06:38:38.4: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8464 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:44:03.60 -10:51:29.1: 14.12 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:18:04.69 -12:16:14.1: 13.31 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:40:46.50 -13:38:11.8: 14.20 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:16:53.20 -08:55:01.3: 13.61 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:37:50.67 -10:00:27.4: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:19:53.19 -12:11:54.7: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:19:54.00 -09:18:45.3: 12.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:57:52.77 -09:19:41.0: 13.66 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:44:03.60 -10:51:29.1: 14.18 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:44:03.60 -10:51:29.1: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9164 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:18:04.69 -12:16:14.1: 13.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:19:53.19 -12:11:54.7: 13.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:37:50.67 -10:00:27.4: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:19:54.00 -09:18:45.3: 12.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:40:46.50 -13:38:11.8: 14.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:37:59.62 -06:16:09.0: 13.57 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:04.69 -12:16:14.1: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4810 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:50.67 -10:00:27.4: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5175 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:53.19 -12:11:54.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4506 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:19:54.00 -09:18:45.3: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4521 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:40:46.50 -13:38:11.8: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9920 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:16:53.20 -08:55:01.3: 13.47 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:16:53.20 -08:55:01.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5127 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:22:08.28 -11:27:43.1: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:57:52.77 -09:19:41.0: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:52.77 -09:19:41.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8919 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:37:59.62 -06:16:09.0: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:59.62 -06:16:09.0: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5820 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:22:08.28 -11:27:43.1: 13.18 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:08.28 -11:27:43.1: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2797 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:57:41.88 -12:15:09.6: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:54:05.35 -13:37:03.8: 13.76 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:21:00.75 -12:31:44.6: 13.43 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:53:34.72 -13:05:59.1: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:48:29.69 -10:13:40.5: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:24:38.39 -06:04:09.2: 13.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:31:53.35 -06:46:58.6: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:57:41.88 -12:15:09.6: 13.47 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:41.88 -12:15:09.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7815 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:21:00.75 -12:31:44.6: 13.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:53:34.72 -13:05:59.1: 13.63 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:48:29.69 -10:13:40.5: 13.68 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:54:05.35 -13:37:03.8: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 20:00:51.03 -12:37:46.6: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:00.75 -12:31:44.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0707 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:34.72 -13:05:59.1: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7608 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:24:38.39 -06:04:09.2: 13.23 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:29.69 -10:13:40.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7591 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:05.35 -13:37:03.8: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8518 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:24:38.39 -06:04:09.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2355 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:51:19.71 -12:35:38.5: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:31:53.35 -06:46:58.6: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:53.35 -06:46:58.6: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2781 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 20:00:51.03 -12:37:46.6: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:00:51.03 -12:37:46.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8838 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:51:19.71 -12:35:38.5: 13.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:51:19.71 -12:35:38.5: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5594 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:53:09.49 -12:17:49.9: 13.76 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:59:42.27 -08:43:58.5: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:21:13.19 -07:30:12.9: 12.67 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:46:07.68 -13:28:25.7: 13.36 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:25:45.23 -12:01:02.8: 12.96 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:21:49.80 -07:35:35.2: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:50:15.05 -12:36:25.2: 13.60 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:53:09.49 -12:17:49.9: 13.69 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:47:51.43 -06:44:22.4: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:59:42.27 -08:43:58.5: 13.55 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:21:13.19 -07:30:12.9: 12.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:53:09.49 -12:17:49.9: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7759 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:25:45.23 -12:01:02.8: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:42.27 -08:43:58.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7131 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:46:07.68 -13:28:25.7: 13.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:13.19 -07:30:12.9: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8005 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:22:57.92 -09:38:51.0: 13.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:45.23 -12:01:02.8: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9662 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:07.68 -13:28:25.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5236 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:21:49.80 -07:35:35.2: 12.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:47:51.43 -06:44:22.4: 12.88 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:50:15.05 -12:36:25.2: 13.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:21:49.80 -07:35:35.2: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0734 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:51.43 -06:44:22.4: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3068 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:50:15.05 -12:36:25.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4689 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:22:57.92 -09:38:51.0: 13.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:57.92 -09:38:51.0: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0259 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:31:06.89 -06:26:11.1: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:22:10.48 -10:32:21.9: 12.95 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:15:21.59 -08:30:30.7: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:45:29.06 -13:01:19.6: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:31:06.89 -06:26:11.1: 12.87 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:31:06.89 -06:26:11.1: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0049 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:36:08.46 -05:53:04.6: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:18:20.58 -08:08:15.9: 11.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:45:14.06 -13:04:09.3: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:30:32.99 -12:30:17.1: 11.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:22:10.48 -10:32:21.9: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:15:21.59 -08:30:30.7: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:22:10.48 -10:32:21.9: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8586 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:21.59 -08:30:30.7: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4807 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:45:29.06 -13:01:19.6: 12.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.75 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:29.06 -13:01:19.6: ref_mag=12.75 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7689 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:58:16.98 -12:00:49.1: 12.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:18:20.58 -08:08:15.9: 11.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:36:08.46 -05:53:04.6: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:30:32.99 -12:30:17.1: 11.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:45:14.06 -13:04:09.3: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:18:20.58 -08:08:15.9: ref_mag=11.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6813 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:32.99 -12:30:17.1: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7784 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:36:08.46 -05:53:04.6: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7222 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:14.06 -13:04:09.3: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6591 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:58:16.98 -12:00:49.1: 12.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:58:16.98 -12:00:49.1: ref_mag=12.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7807 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:55:24.51 -12:38:15.0: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:25:16.53 -13:22:12.1: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:55:24.51 -12:38:15.0: 12.84 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:25:16.53 -13:22:12.1: 12.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:55:24.51 -12:38:15.0: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0995 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:49:01.20 -09:58:31.7: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:25:16.53 -13:22:12.1: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8443 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:59:14.68 -12:20:37.5: 13.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:59:36.04 -11:28:34.3: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:37:09.08 -06:38:54.3: 14.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:33:50.77 -11:24:15.3: 14.77 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:16:33.34 -13:17:51.5: 15.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:49:01.20 -09:58:31.7: 13.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:49:01.20 -09:58:31.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.4278 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:59:14.68 -12:20:37.5: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:14.68 -12:20:37.5: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7897 delta=-0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:37:09.08 -06:38:54.3: 14.12 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:59:36.04 -11:28:34.3: 13.31 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:37:09.08 -06:38:54.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7705 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:36.04 -11:28:34.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9148 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:32:23.94 -10:20:58.6: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:59:28.79 -10:58:15.4: 14.17 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:33:50.77 -11:24:15.3: 14.54 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:16:33.34 -13:17:51.5: 15.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:33:50.77 -11:24:15.3: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8935 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:47:08.20 -13:00:18.7: 14.35 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:32:23.94 -10:20:58.6: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:59:28.79 -10:58:15.4: 14.23 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:32:23.94 -10:20:58.6: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8823 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:59:28.79 -10:58:15.4: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1992 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:57:50.90 -07:55:57.6: 14.40 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:45:03.05 -10:32:13.6: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:54:16.50 -13:55:24.2: 14.13 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:47:08.20 -13:00:18.7: 14.50 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:47:08.20 -13:00:18.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1083 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:54:40.12 -13:21:34.0: 14.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:48:55.40 -12:12:10.2: 14.68 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:57:50.90 -07:55:57.6: 14.42 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:57:50.90 -07:55:57.6: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1376 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:45:03.05 -10:32:13.6: 14.32 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.26 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:45:03.05 -10:32:13.6: ref_mag=14.26 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1495 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:54:16.50 -13:55:24.2: 14.26 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:16.50 -13:55:24.2: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2479 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:54:40.12 -13:21:34.0: 14.59 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:54:40.12 -13:21:34.0: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.3685 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:48:55.40 -12:12:10.2: 14.86 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:48:55.40 -12:12:10.2: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.2747 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:34:59.52 -10:46:29.9: 14.31 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:34:59.52 -10:46:29.9: 14.55 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:34:59.52 -10:46:29.9: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.2256 delta=1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:20:34.47 -07:40:00.3: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-53-18_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0133.fits at 19:30:43.33 -10:53:50.6: 13.32 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:20:34.47 -07:40:00.3: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:20:34.47 -07:40:00.3: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1124 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-15_03-54-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0135.fits at 19:30:43.33 -10:53:50.6: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:30:43.33 -10:53:50.6: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.2869 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142156.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47258.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48970.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139595_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139595_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139606_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139606_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139625_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139625_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139626_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139626_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139634_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139634_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139635_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139635_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139636_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139636_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139638_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139638_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:17:49.42 -08:50:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139642_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139642_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139650_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139650_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139652_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139652_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139670_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139670_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139675_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139675_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139692_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139692_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139700_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139700_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139702_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139702_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139705_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139705_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139715_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139715_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:40:35.34 -08:53:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139718_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139718_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139721_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139721_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139727_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139727_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139729_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139729_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139730_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139730_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139738_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139738_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139744_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139744_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139745_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139745_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139750_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139750_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:57.77 -14:02:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139754_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139754_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139756_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139756_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139757_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139757_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139758_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139758_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139759_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139759_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139760_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139760_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:07.08 -10:30:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139761_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139761_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139768_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139768_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139770_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139770_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:19:16.86 -07:36:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139775_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139775_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139776_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139776_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:50:20.70 -13:32:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139781_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139781_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139783_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139783_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:53.99 -06:36:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139789_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139789_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139804_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139804_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139808_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139808_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139810_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139810_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139819_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139819_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139822_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139822_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139823_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139823_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139824_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139824_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:59.44 -07:11:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139828_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139828_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:31.99 -11:56:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139833_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139833_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139834_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139834_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139842_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139842_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:37.11 -10:14:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139843_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139843_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139852_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139852_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:15.18 -07:31:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139854_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139854_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139858_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139858_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139865_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139865_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139867_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139867_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139868_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139868_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139870_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139870_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:37.94 -08:14:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 139880_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 139880_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:30.50 -08:23:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140668_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 140668_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140774_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 140774_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:16:01.88 -07:14:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140812_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 140812_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140821_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 140821_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:58:41.34 -10:54:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140982_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 140982_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141181_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141181_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:00:48.82 -10:45:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141206_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141206_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141217_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141217_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:44:16.76 -06:46:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141291_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141291_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141295_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141295_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:53:19.62 -11:47:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141454_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141454_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:33:05.05 -06:49:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141585_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141585_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:35:23.10 -14:04:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141636_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141636_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141639_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141639_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141663_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141663_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:55:35.33 -08:22:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141693_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141693_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 141947_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 141947_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142149_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142149_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142156_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 142156_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142172_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142172_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:54:18.85 -13:45:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142210_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142210_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:02.37 -06:12:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142298_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142298_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142498_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142498_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142514_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142514_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142516_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142516_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142556_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142556_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142624_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142624_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142683_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142683_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142734_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142734_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142751_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142751_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142803_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 142803_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143068_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 143068_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143240_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 143240_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143347_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 143347_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143687_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 143687_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26567_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 26567_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:34:59.64 -12:35:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48970_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
Preparing report for the candidate 48970_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49102_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 49102_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:18:28.82 -10:41:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82232_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 82232_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:43:12.94 -07:31:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133984_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 133984_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:24:42.06 -11:03:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59424_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 59424_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:28:44.39 -09:56:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18708_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 18708_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:31.92 -13:18:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42076_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 42076_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:57:16.82 -11:14:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31521_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 31521_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:07.47 -12:09:10.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130901_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 130901_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105287_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145
The candidate 105287_Aql-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-17_00-00-24_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0145 did not pass the final checks
