## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
First image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Last  image: 2461208.70424039 17.06.2026 04:53:56.370   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.44
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4277
Objects passed selection criteria:  4277
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4380.75
Average stars matched: 4018 (91.7195 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   111400 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Jun 16 23:57:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
First image: 2461093.78748612 22.02.2026 06:53:48.801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Last  image: 2461208.70424039 17.06.2026 04:53:56.370   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 57
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  23217
Objects passed selection criteria:  23160
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.5    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 27549.2
Average stars matched: 21284.2 (77.2589 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   135132 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Jun 16 23:59:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-10-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 93043 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 93043 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits_preview.png'

UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits


renamed 'UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits_preview.png'

UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 431.5825
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.1146
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1058.5521
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.8527
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1059.0386
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 474.5288
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.45272
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     27.0100002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 27.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.9899997711182 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 27.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.70359287
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:17.245 +46:01:10.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:17.245 +46:01:10.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0493 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:13.537 +46:00:33.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:13.537 +46:00:33.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0361 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:48:17.245 +46:01:10.32
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:13.537 +46:00:33.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01485 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tcccJBbhqc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bPDKzHcy5B
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G8S5xTyX2T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Zp0O7Pyu7d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3881 deg
Loaded 4560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3127 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 6977 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.924200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.924200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.44
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.48

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.3881 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2907 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.3881 deg
Loaded 4560 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3127 out of 3305 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3305 out of 6977 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.7479 to 174.3135 deg, Dec +40.3419 to +51.2583 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.7479 to 174.3135 deg, Dec 40.3419 to 51.2583 deg
Loaded 4269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3196 out of 3285 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3285 out of 6367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.4 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 15.3 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 15.1 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
 15.1 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.1 (SNR )  12.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tcccJBbhqc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=476, passed=6977
Got 6977 stars (including 6493 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 956 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=956 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=223 n_q2=254 n_q3=246 n_q4=233 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bPDKzHcy5B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, passed=6367
Got 6367 stars (including 6003 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 947 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.550 n_q1=214 n_q2=261 n_q3=242 n_q4=241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G8S5xTyX2T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=4888
Got 4888 stars (including 4530 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4888 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 962 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=962 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=216 n_q2=255 n_q3=241 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Zp0O7Pyu7d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, passed=4872
Got 4872 stars (including 4511 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4872 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=961 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=213 n_q2=251 n_q3=243 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.248
ref2=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits sigma_overall=0.472 worst_q_ratio=1.166
new1=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.165
new2=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.133
reference average sigma_overall=0.4275 worst_q_ratio=1.207
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300_astrometric_residuals.png (956 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136_astrometric_residuals.png (962 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137_astrometric_residuals.png (961 matched stars from wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:38:35.37 +49:53:29.2:  11.79 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:38:35.37 +49:53:29.2:  11.75 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:35.37 +49:53:29.2: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7775 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21422_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 21422_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    11.74    10:38:35.36 +49:53:29.2   5711 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    11.82    10:38:35.39 +49:53:29.1   5704 0818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.0'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:17.245 +46:01:10.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:17.245 +46:01:10.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0493 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:48:13.537 +46:00:33.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.354 +46:00:05.88
Second-epoch image center 10:48:13.537 +46:00:33.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0361 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  10:48:17.245 +46:01:10.32
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:13.537 +46:00:33.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01485 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nuXzApPNDF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5q66hoTwlJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uNSedNfVCE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uLX2sLi4qQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.4078 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2964 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 34182 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.66

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.66

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34182 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec +39.8246 to +51.4078 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.2627 to 173.9078 deg, Dec 39.8246 to 51.4078 deg
Loaded 4573 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2964 out of 3314 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3314 out of 34182 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 30481 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 149.6976 to 174.3134 deg, Dec +40.3159 to +51.2658 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 149.6976 to 174.3134 deg, Dec 40.3159 to 51.2658 deg
Loaded 4298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3062 out of 3297 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3297 out of 30481 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 21 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
 2.4 pix  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
 2.1 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 2.2 pix  wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.7 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.4 (SNR )  14.7 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nuXzApPNDF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1513, passed=34166
Got 34166 stars (including 32583 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34166 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 709 (Dec 39.8 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=222 n_q2=251 n_q3=249 n_q4=238 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5q66hoTwlJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1294, passed=30466
Got 30466 stars (including 29138 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30466 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30160 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 30161 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.532 n_q1=223 n_q2=262 n_q3=240 n_q4=234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.124
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uNSedNfVCE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1483, passed=36807
Got 36807 stars (including 35246 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36807 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=218 n_q2=248 n_q3=233 n_q4=244 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.115
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uLX2sLi4qQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1252, passed=36425
Got 36425 stars (including 35098 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36425 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 928 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 35634 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits N_match=940 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.393 n_q1=221 n_q2=244 n_q3=228 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:49:25.20 +42:56:46.7:  13.50 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:38:35.37 +49:53:29.2:  11.79 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:06:48.11 +46:19:16.6:  14.05 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:26:25.29 +43:10:31.4:  12.84 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:33:34.08 +49:15:21.5:  14.49 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 11:03:28.56 +42:42:24.0:  14.19 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:37:40.64 +48:50:26.3:  13.69 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:49:25.20 +42:56:46.7:  13.52 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.51 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:49:25.20 +42:56:46.7: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5232 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:38:35.37 +49:53:29.2:  11.74 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:26:25.29 +43:10:31.4:  12.77 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:03:28.56 +42:42:24.0:  14.38 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:38:35.37 +49:53:29.2: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.8292 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 11:06:48.11 +46:19:16.6:  14.12 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:33:34.08 +49:15:21.5:  14.57 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:26:25.29 +43:10:31.4: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9684 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:28.56 +42:42:24.0: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4453 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:37:40.64 +48:50:26.3:  13.68 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.53 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:06:48.11 +46:19:16.6: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.5828 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:33:34.08 +49:15:21.5: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7163 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:37:40.64 +48:50:26.3: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7370 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:41:09.16 +43:13:14.7:  15.20 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-53-48_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0300.fits at 10:53:03.64 +48:56:24.3:  15.00 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:41:09.16 +43:13:14.7:  15.12 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:41:09.16 +43:13:14.7: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9051 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-05-11_00-03-55_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0183.fits at 10:53:03.64 +48:56:24.3:  15.38 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.10 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:53:03.64 +48:56:24.3: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9258 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56769_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56769_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    14.76    11:06:48.09 +46:19:17.3   2854 2977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.49    11:06:48.12 +46:19:15.8   2848 2971   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56787_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56787_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    14.59    10:33:34.07 +49:15:20.6   6222 1185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.98    10:33:34.10 +49:15:22.5   6216 1179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56788_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56788_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    14.46    11:03:28.62 +42:42:23.5   3120 5181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.43    11:03:28.51 +42:42:24.5   3113 5174   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56794_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56794_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    13.74    10:37:40.65 +48:50:26.2   5827 1458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    13.74    10:37:40.63 +48:50:26.4   5821 1452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56796_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56796_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    13.49    10:49:25.23 +42:56:46.7   4683 5055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    13.57    10:49:25.18 +42:56:46.7   4677 5049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56797_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56797_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    13.30    11:09:29.75 +48:51:13.1   2651 1422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

**** FOUND  11:09:29.72 +48:51:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56801_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56801_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    12.98    10:26:25.30 +43:10:31.2   7221 4811   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    12.96    10:26:25.29 +43:10:31.5   7214 4805   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56802_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56802_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    11.80    10:38:35.35 +49:53:29.2   5711 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    11.86    10:38:35.39 +49:53:29.2   5704 0818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58235_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 58235_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    13.95    10:27:07.38 +46:42:02.5   6971 2680   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

**** FOUND  10:27:07.47 +46:42:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59101_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 59101_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.15    10:44:16.35 +44:41:00.3   5222 3989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

**** FOUND  10:44:16.45 +44:41:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60033_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 60033_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.88    11:00:34.10 +42:07:09.3   3427 5541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60347_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 60347_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.43    10:52:19.38 +48:53:42.4   4363 1451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60633_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 60633_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.53    10:30:09.01 +43:28:38.6   6789 4651   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60892_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 60892_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.64    10:46:15.76 +46:58:09.9   4985 2612   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61487_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 61487_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    15.05    10:29:06.41 +45:52:04.4   6801 3198   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61667_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 61667_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.43    11:10:56.51 +47:51:05.7   2470 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61810_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 61810_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    14.83    10:53:03.69 +48:56:25.3   4296 1429   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    15.11    10:53:03.58 +48:56:23.4   4290 1424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61880_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 61880_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.79    10:42:26.34 +46:03:55.0   5395 3149   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

**** FOUND  10:42:26.48 +46:03:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62769_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 62769_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 06 17.20359    2461208.70359    14.96    10:41:09.10 +43:13:16.2   5593 4870   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-00_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0136.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.86    10:41:09.23 +43:13:13.2   5586 4865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63362_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 63362_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.66    11:07:29.24 +44:34:29.1   2723 4024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56107_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137
The candidate 56107_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 06 17.20424    2461208.70424    14.05    11:21:29.98 +44:18:34.7   1189 4080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_235509_TTUQ2b1x1_615912_yBAVpnyp/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-53-56_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0137.fits

**** FOUND  11:21:30.01 +44:18:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461208.70359287 -observatory V36
07:27:32.76 +22:41:14.0 Mercury (0.6mag)
08:27:17.57 +21:13:11.3 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:15:53.72 +17:38:01.9 Mars (1.3mag)
07:56:05.03 +21:11:34.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:44.75 +03:01:19.6 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:02:18.96 +20:31:28.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:35.66 +00:19:14.0 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:47.89 -23:08:04.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:47:39.83 +23:24:00.2 Moon (-8.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 16 23:57 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461208.70359287:
07:56:09.73 +21:11:21.9 Io (6.2mag)
07:56:04.77 +21:11:34.6 Europa (6.3mag)
07:56:05.15 +21:11:39.9 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:55:55.64 +21:12:10.5 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:55:50.28 +20:48:56.8 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:56:04.40 +21:11:37.3 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:55:34.85 +21:00:36.1 Elara (17.6mag)
07:58:42.41 +21:18:21.2 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:02:15.42 +21:14:01.6 Carme (18.9mag)
00:51:52.51 +03:01:37.8 Titan (8.6mag)
00:51:41.57 +03:01:32.1 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:52:05.49 +03:03:51.2 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:51:58.64 +03:01:26.0 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:52:15.79 +03:01:57.6 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 16 23:57 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461208.70359287:
17:28:34.72 -35:36:59.6 JWST
17:53:02.46 +36:21:22.7 Chandra
08:35:22.72 -47:43:09.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 16 23:57 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461208.70359287 -observatory V36
18:36:49.96 -33:16:23.5 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:02:24.78 -68:00:04.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:52:23.63 +32:05:23.4 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:11:08.87 +15:43:50.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
22:41:15.36 -41:11:06.8 16.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:10:11.16 +31:54:15.1 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:45:02.20 +27:00:34.1 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:36:26.52 +30:45:05.8 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:55:33.05 +04:19:30.6 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:22:16.21 +21:42:10.3 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:16:23.12 -11:02:47.5 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:10:18.26 +67:01:55.9 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:23:57.45 -07:36:17.5 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:50.41 +80:53:35.8 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:23:22.71 +64:38:11.8 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
07:00:41.86 +28:34:31.1 13.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:30:29.18 +14:14:00.0 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:06:13.79 +33:44:57.4 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:27:02.58 -15:12:41.7 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:14:14.94 +32:56:37.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:15.82 +52:12:14.2 17.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:54:54.77 -11:18:10.4 14.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:31:59.71 +23:10:59.1 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:55.33 +04:36:31.5 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:55:44.03 +76:52:47.6 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:15:34.51 +44:01:05.0 16.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:13:50.35 -00:49:34.7 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:39:50.80 -09:29:16.9 8.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:04:26.42 -01:07:58.7 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:25:36.03 +26:49:16.7 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:19:11.31 +21:08:48.6 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:34:14.43 -05:50:42.1 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:12:43.51 +34:08:25.1 17.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:31:02.30 +18:17:04.2 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:39:43.68 +06:42:58.0 15.7mag 88P/Howell
05:23:34.93 +30:48:23.0 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
03:09:01.18 +28:57:49.5 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:12:12.09 +32:37:23.0 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:06:00.99 +10:48:08.2 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:13:54.34 +19:48:32.4 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:51:25.41 +19:25:57.0 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:35:17.54 +17:26:38.2 15.8mag 141P/Machholz
06:38:34.13 +17:54:08.0 15.7mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:38:12.43 +17:06:18.6 12.6mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:03:50.65 -23:30:58.5 16.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:11:40.11 +27:13:49.4 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:34:17.12 +04:35:58.2 16.4mag 169P/NEAT
00:42:22.99 +04:09:26.6 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:45:42.75 -08:09:17.8 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR
07:54:54.46 +35:02:41.3 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:56:10.01 +01:26:47.8 16.2mag 260P/McNaught
04:29:11.33 +34:01:01.0 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:41:30.35 +00:25:50.3 17.8mag 320P/McNaught
15:11:34.52 +07:42:38.6 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:14:28.97 +20:29:44.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:14:39.09 +41:02:27.0 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 16 23:57 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50  AT2026lig  2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50  SN2026kcp  2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90  SN2026kza  2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30  SN 2026fov  2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90  AT2026kis  2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40  ASASSN-26dc  2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60  ASASSN-26db  2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00  ASASSN-26da  2026-04-25.32 16.11
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70  SN2026jsg  2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80  SN2026kid  2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40  AT2026kcf  2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50  SN2026jkb  2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20  AT2026dil  2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30  SN2026jlm  2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00  ASASSN-26cz  2026-04-22.28 16.29
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50  ASASSN-26cy  2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60  AT2026jcm  2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40  SN 2026iqy  2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00  ASASSN-26cx  2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90  SN 2026idu  2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20  SN 2026icv  2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90  ASASSN-26cv  2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50  ASASSN-26cw  2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10  ASASSN-26cu  2026-04-16.29 -2.7
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60  ASASSN-26ct  2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50  SN2026huo  2026-04-12.14 16.96
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20    2026-06-15.39 15.93
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10  AT2026ixd  2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40  SN2026icy  2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30  SN2026gud  2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90  ASASSN-26cs  2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10  ASASSN-26cr  2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90  AT2026ihl  2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80  AT2026imw  2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50  ASASSN-26cq  2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80  ASASSN-26cp  2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70  SN2026idh  2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40  AT2026imr  2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40  AT2026hei  2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80  AT2026ihm  2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30  AT2026imo  2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80  SN 2026hnn  2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80  ASASSN-26cn  2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90  ASASSN-26co  2026-04-7.15 14.93
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20  AT2026hvw  2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00  ASASSN-26cl  2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70  ASASSN-26cm  2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60  ASASSN-26ck  2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20  AT2026hyy  2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90  ASASSN-26cj  2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40  SN2026gvk  2026-03-30 15.28
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20  SN2026gzx  2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70  ASASSN-26ci  2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00  SN2026hkg  2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00  SN2026fin  2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60  ASASSN-26ch  2026-03-28.12 13.14
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 16 23:57 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7  TCP J19324367-2239307  2026-04-05.4395  13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9  TCP J16163603+4452289  2026-04-05.6655  14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4  PNV J00433836+4115324  2026-04-08.079  17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8  TCP J15411168+5918268  2026-04-12.9625  19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0  PNV J00433502+4146280  2026-04-23.056  15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2  PNV J00425564+4114122  2026-04-24.042  16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1  TCP J21140338+5646441  2026-05-05.3534  16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1  TCP J15030519+2202041  2026-05-08.3260  13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7  TCP J07151825+4753167  2026-05-09.1599  14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6  TCP J16001844-2230106  2026-05-09.6135  13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5  PNV J00424745+4116585  2026-05-10.030  16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8  PNV J09550289+6902138  2026-05-18.925  20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6  PNV J00430182+4118166  2026-05-21.8651  18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4  PNV J00425120+4116594  2022-10-26.135  19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0  TCP J12242510+2847120  2026-05-31.6015  14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6  TCP J00560713+4301406  2026-06-01.4135  12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2  PNV J00424164+4115162  2026-06-02.029  17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2  PNV J00423868+4115582  2026-06-05.1224  19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7  PNV J19004295-4831017  2026-05-25.0752  14.2mag
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 16 23:57 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:46:28.312 +01:33:28.69  AT 2026osg  2026-06-05.29 20.5651
15:08:15.449 -04:43:16.48  SN 2026osf  2026-06-06.32 20.375
14:51:30.247 +22:37:57.23  AT 2026ose  2026-06-03.23 20.5827
17:19:28.178 -01:48:39.65  SN 2026osd  2026-06-07.33 20.757
21:42:45.017 +13:53:40.78  SN 2026osc  2026-06-05.13 18.87
10:04:17.793 +10:47:28.54  AT 2026osb  2026-06-08.89 18.473
17:01:33.332 +50:43:50.85  AT 2026osa  2026-06-07.10 20.02
15:52:00.811 +48:12:41.81  AT 2026orz  2026-06-03.97 19.6
16:57:43.679 +55:34:29.61  SN 2026ory  2026-06-09.06 19.74
17:06:48.379 +56:34:34.28  AT 2026orx  2026-06-09.06 19.96
15:50:02.310 +47:40:40.67  AT 2026orw  2026-06-06.100 20.04
15:13:24.305 +58:43:44.69  AT 2026orv  2026-06-05.81 20.34
16:25:01.930 +43:59:23.83  AT 2026oru  2026-06-08.86 20.51
15:54:39.489 +41:09:29.50  AT 2026ort  2026-06-08.88 18.75
16:16:12.071 +25:03:21.02  AT 2026ors  2026-06-08.83 20.53
17:19:04.503 +56:21:42.34  AT 2026orr  2026-06-08.99 19.83
18:30:49.765 +57:45:58.06  AT 2026orq  2026-06-09.01 19.79
13:40:26.067 -11:21:43.50  AT 2026orp  2026-06-08.28 20.09
15:02:17.243 +11:30:39.84  SN 2026oro  2026-06-08.90 19.6
20:32:51.763 -17:28:15.13  AT 2026orn  2026-06-08.40 19.8995
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 16 23:57 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Jun 16 23:57:03 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 5s (0.08 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 41s (0.68 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 53s (0.88 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 105s (1.75 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 12 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 21s (0.35 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 72s (1.20 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 99s (1.65 min)
FIELD_UMa-10-Q2b1x1: 212s (3.53 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 214s (3.57 min)
Finished: Wed Jun 17 00:00:37 CDT 2026