This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 10.98 11:59:25.42 +00:02:16.7
276.04122 60.16564 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.20 Massalia 0 0 0 11.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:59:25.42 +00:02:16.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:59:25.42 +00:02:16.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 11 59 25.42 +00 02 16.7 11.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6788,10.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1788 10.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 13.18 12:02:42.11 +00:24:09.6
277.27900 60.82372 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.122 Gerda -0 -0 0 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:02:42.11 +00:24:09.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:02:42.11 +00:24:09.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 12 02 42.11 +00 24 09.6 13.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6788,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1788 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 13.14 12:21:14.39 -01:10:24.4
287.32244 60.77982 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.204 Kallisto 0 0 0 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:21:14.39 -01:10:24.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:21:14.39 -01:10:24.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 12 21 14.39 -01 10 24.4 13.1 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6788,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1788 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 14.15 11:46:56.91 -00:40:47.7
271.17454 58.15890 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.453 Tea 0 -0 1 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:46:56.91 -00:40:47.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:46:56.91 -00:40:47.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 11 46 56.91 +00 40 47.7 14.2 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6788,14.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1788 14.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 13.97 12:22:57.32 -03:38:38.6
289.24867 58.46896 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.184 Dejopeja 1 -0 1 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:22:57.32 -03:38:38.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:22:57.32 -03:38:38.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 12 22 57.32 -03 38 38.6 14.0 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6788,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1788 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 14.27 11:57:43.16 +00:27:54.7
274.90406 60.38038 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.207 Hedda -1 0 1 14.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:57:43.16 +00:27:54.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:57:43.16 +00:27:54.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 11 57 43.16 +00 27 54.7 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6788,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1788 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 14.53 11:58:16.52 -03:29:14.8
278.15294 56.80474 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:58:16.52 -03:29:14.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:58:16.52 -03:29:14.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:58:16.52 -03:29:14.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 11 58 16.52 -03 29 14.8 14.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6788,14.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1788 14.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 14.64 12:23:44.95 -03:36:26.9
289.60492 58.54599 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.7" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 12:23:44.95 -03:36:26.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:23:44.95 -03:36:26.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:23:44.95 -03:36:26.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 12 23 44.95 -03 36 26.9 14.6 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6788,14.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1788 14.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1788 2461208.6788 14.88 12:05:10.36 -03:24:02.7
281.06553 57.49358 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 6.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.766 Moguntia -0 1 1 15.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:05:10.36 -03:24:02.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:05:10.36 -03:24:02.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1788* 12 05 10.36 -03 24 02.7 14.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6788,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1788 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
First image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Last image: 2461208.67906540 17.06.2026 04:17:41.251 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 16
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4093
Objects passed selection criteria: 4089
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3854.5
Average stars matched: 3798.5 (98.5472 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110704 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:42:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
First image: 2461168.70921274 08.05.2026 05:01:05.981 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Last image: 2461208.67906540 17.06.2026 04:17:41.251 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24136
Objects passed selection criteria: 24084
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 26884.8
Average stars matched: 22609.2 (84.0969 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 132524 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:43:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Vir-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Vir-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Vir-06-Q2b1x1
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 101226 MB free at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
WARNING: server tau is low on disk space, only 101226 MB free at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.png' -> 'transient_report/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits_preview.png'
Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
renamed 'Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.png' -> 'transient_report/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits_preview.png'
Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 587.8533
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 439.7028
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1232.6078
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 448.4674
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1233.6069
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 447.9216
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.09679
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.3099994659424 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.67856747
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits'
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.030 -01:59:56.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.030 -01:59:56.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.045 -02:00:34.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.045 -02:00:34.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.030 -01:59:56.31
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:00.045 -02:00:34.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01074 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NrVxEoTe5V
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.93fAHfYCmt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y8SsedUGsx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z8VppvMplG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1380 to 187.8322 deg, Dec -7.2570 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3700 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3124 out of 3225 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3225 out of 5769 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1485 to 187.8717 deg, Dec -7.2565 to +3.2689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1485 to 187.8717 deg, Dec -7.2565 to 3.2689 deg
Loaded 3703 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3118 out of 3206 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3206 out of 5500 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 16 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
14.9 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
14.9 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NrVxEoTe5V (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=5769
Got 5769 stars (including 5411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5769 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5747 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.504 n_q1=240 n_q2=228 n_q3=252 n_q4=258 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.114
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.93fAHfYCmt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, passed=5500
Got 5500 stars (including 5152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5500 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.475 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.492 n_q1=242 n_q2=229 n_q3=244 n_q4=260 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y8SsedUGsx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=297, passed=4476
Got 4476 stars (including 4177 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 983 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 983 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 983 stars left (next iteration limit 1081)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits N_match=983 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.421 n_q1=235 n_q2=233 n_q3=253 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Z8VppvMplG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, passed=4449
Got 4449 stars (including 4130 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4449 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 983 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 983 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 983 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4394 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 983 stars left (next iteration limit 1081)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits N_match=983 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=239 n_q2=233 n_q3=245 n_q4=266 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits sigma_overall=0.452 worst_q_ratio=1.114
ref2=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits sigma_overall=0.447 worst_q_ratio=1.099
new1=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.132
new2=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.154
reference average sigma_overall=0.4495 worst_q_ratio=1.1065
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102_astrometric_residuals.png (983 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103_astrometric_residuals.png (983 matched stars from wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:59:25.42 +00:02:16.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:54:29.14 -00:58:15.7: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:06:20.73 -00:40:59.7: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:55:35.14 -00:41:02.5: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:03:13.52 -01:28:03.3: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:57:01.91 -00:26:59.1: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:03:25.47 -03:09:19.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:02:36.80 -00:08:43.4: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:00:16.79 -01:25:31.6: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:04:33.09 +00:15:34.8: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:03:25.47 -03:09:19.9: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:55:35.14 -00:41:02.5: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:54:29.14 -00:58:15.7: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:59:25.42 +00:02:16.7: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:00:16.79 -01:25:31.6: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:02:36.80 -00:08:43.4: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:57:01.91 -00:26:59.1: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:03:13.52 -01:28:03.3: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:25.47 -03:09:19.9: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0229 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:35.14 -00:41:02.5: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0819 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:06:20.73 -00:40:59.7: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:54:29.14 -00:58:15.7: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1406 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:36.80 -00:08:43.4: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1001 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:00:16.79 -01:25:31.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1217 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:57:01.91 -00:26:59.1: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0403 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.25 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:13.52 -01:28:03.3: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1459 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:20.73 -00:40:59.7: ref_mag=12.25 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0922 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:04:33.09 +00:15:34.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:04:33.09 +00:15:34.8: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1191 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:59:30.88 -02:26:07.9: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:56:10.65 -02:49:34.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:54:50.33 -00:00:47.9: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:55:31.37 -03:44:09.0: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:59:30.88 -02:26:07.9: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:56:10.65 -02:49:34.7: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:54:50.33 -00:00:47.9: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:55:31.37 -03:44:09.0: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:59:30.88 -02:26:07.9: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1265 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:56:10.65 -02:49:34.7: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1847 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:54:50.33 -00:00:47.9: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2209 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:55:31.37 -03:44:09.0: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2111 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20130.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20130_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 20130_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20136_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20136_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20137_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20137_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20138_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20138_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20139_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20139_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20140_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20140_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:03:39.90 -01:53:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20141_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20141_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20142_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20142_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20144_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20144_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20146_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20146_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20148_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20148_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20152_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20152_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20153_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20153_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20155_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20155_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20157_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20157_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:52:06.57 -01:42:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20158_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 20158_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
11:59:25.42 +00:02:16.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.030 -01:59:56.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.030 -01:59:56.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0052 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.045 -02:00:34.99 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.789 -01:59:55.39
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.045 -02:00:34.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0122 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:00.030 -01:59:56.31
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:00.045 -02:00:34.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01074 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TvbcEzfB4E
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9w1bbHHU7G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits &> /tmp/tmp.muOiXn29CG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5oFHdKgoJN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits and wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31480 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3710 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3069 out of 3283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3283 out of 31480 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.623700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.623700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31480 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to +3.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1381 to 187.8856 deg, Dec -7.2657 to 3.2681 deg
Loaded 3710 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3069 out of 3283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3283 out of 31480 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 29846 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 172.1457 to 187.8899 deg, Dec -7.2611 to +3.2689 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 172.1457 to 187.8899 deg, Dec -7.2611 to 3.2689 deg
Loaded 3709 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3089 out of 3275 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3275 out of 29846 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 56 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.1 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
2.3 pix Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.TvbcEzfB4E (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1333, passed=31468
Got 31468 stars (including 30100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31468 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 976 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.482 n_q1=240 n_q2=227 n_q3=251 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9w1bbHHU7G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1289, passed=29841
Got 29841 stars (including 28505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29841 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 973 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29733 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.470 n_q1=243 n_q2=227 n_q3=251 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.muOiXn29CG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1337, passed=35126
Got 35126 stars (including 33718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35126 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34154 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34152 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=240 n_q2=218 n_q3=260 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5oFHdKgoJN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1364, passed=35120
Got 35120 stars (including 33676 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 35120 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 951 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34186 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34185 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34184 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.400 n_q1=248 n_q2=216 n_q3=253 n_q4=250 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits -region wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-16-58_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0102.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_233708_TTUQ2b1x1_3166301_MFvsy6BC/wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:57:37.91 -04:26:26.5: 14.29 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:17:43.05 -02:57:43.1: 14.73 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:13:04.75 +01:39:16.0: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:12:29.09 +01:26:17.6: 14.39 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:05:37.67 +01:49:40.3: 14.37 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:17:31.80 +01:51:51.1: 14.47 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:26:33.33 -02:10:08.9: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:56:45.47 -02:10:34.9: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:06:11.24 +01:26:50.2: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:17:31.80 +01:51:51.1: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:05:37.67 +01:49:40.3: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:12:29.09 +01:26:17.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:17:43.05 -02:57:43.1: 14.67 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:57:37.91 -04:26:26.5: 14.22 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.49 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:06:11.24 +01:26:50.2: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:13:04.75 +01:39:16.0: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:31.80 +01:51:51.1: ref_mag=14.49 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3123 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:26:33.33 -02:10:08.9: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:05:37.67 +01:49:40.3: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4540 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:56:45.47 -02:10:34.9: 14.39 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:29.09 +01:26:17.6: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4434 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:43.05 -02:57:43.1: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5911 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:57:37.91 -04:26:26.5: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1857 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:11.24 +01:26:50.2: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0274 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:13:04.75 +01:39:16.0: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9582 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:33.33 -02:10:08.9: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8275 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:56:45.47 -02:10:34.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1762 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:02:42.11 +00:24:09.6: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:02:42.11 +00:24:09.6: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:46:56.91 -00:40:47.7: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:21:14.39 -01:10:24.4: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:22:57.32 -03:38:38.6: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:57:43.16 +00:27:54.7: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:18:33.43 -04:04:56.6: 14.13 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 11:58:16.52 -03:29:14.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:46:56.91 -00:40:47.7: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:21:14.39 -01:10:24.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:57:43.16 +00:27:54.7: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:22:57.32 -03:38:38.6: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:18:33.43 -04:04:56.6: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:18:33.43 -04:04:56.6: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0396 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 11:58:16.52 -03:29:14.8: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:23:44.95 -03:36:26.9: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:17:25.29 -01:21:33.9: 15.52 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:02:45.76 -04:27:08.1: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:23:44.95 -03:36:26.9: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:17:25.29 -01:21:33.9: 14.94 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:17:25.29 -01:21:33.9: ref_mag=15.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6408 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:02:45.76 -04:27:08.1: 15.42 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:02:45.76 -04:27:08.1: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7335 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:15:01.41 -02:36:29.7: 15.26 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:20:48.92 -03:34:47.1: 14.89 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:15:01.41 -02:36:29.7: 15.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.19 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:15:01.41 -02:36:29.7: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7785 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:20:48.92 -03:34:47.1: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:23:01.43 -02:25:14.6: 15.15 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:20:48.92 -03:34:47.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6549 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:23:01.43 -02:25:14.6: 14.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:01.43 -02:25:14.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7835 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:11:05.36 +00:11:27.9: 15.63 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:05:10.36 -03:24:02.7: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:11:05.36 +00:11:27.9: 15.47 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:11:05.36 +00:11:27.9: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.8907 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:05:10.36 -03:24:02.7: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:06:23.17 -04:42:17.9: 15.61 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:06:23.17 -04:42:17.9: 15.27 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.40 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:06:23.17 -04:42:17.9: ref_mag=15.40 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9792 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:24:24.94 -02:43:05.9: 14.64 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:23:43.33 -02:51:35.3: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:24:24.94 -02:43:05.9: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:24:24.94 -02:43:05.9: ref_mag=14.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7247 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:23:43.33 -02:51:35.3: 14.76 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:43.33 -02:51:35.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.7390 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:12:36.63 -04:18:20.7: 15.45 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:12:36.63 -04:18:20.7: 15.17 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.28 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:12:36.63 -04:18:20.7: ref_mag=15.28 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7583 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:23:29.27 -00:18:58.8: 14.61 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:23:29.27 -00:18:58.8: 15.05 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:23:29.27 -00:18:58.8: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9334 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-08_00-01-05_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0150.fits at 12:26:10.37 -00:09:40.6: 14.77 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-36-51_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHT_0157.fits at 12:26:10.37 -00:09:40.6: 15.31 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.89 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:26:10.37 -00:09:40.6: ref_mag=14.89 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8608 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52454.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52573.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53552.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53860.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53885.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55022.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56013.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57634.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 7s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51478_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51478_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51482_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51482_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51502_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51502_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51510_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51510_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51513_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51513_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51516_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51516_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51518_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51518_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51520_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51520_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51536_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51536_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51537_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51537_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51634_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51634_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:59:25.42 +00:02:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52454_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 52454_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 52573_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53206_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 53206_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53552_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 53552_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53630_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 53630_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:06:58.05 -05:02:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53860_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 53860_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53885_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 53885_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53963_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 53963_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54133_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 54133_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54539_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 54539_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54609_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 54609_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54694_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 54694_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54727_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 54727_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55022_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 55022_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55074_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 55074_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55382_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 55382_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55804_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 55804_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56013_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 56013_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56051_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56051_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56056_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56056_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56208_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56208_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56333_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56333_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56443_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56443_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56641_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56641_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56685_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56685_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56717_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56717_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56755_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56755_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56814_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56814_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56897_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56897_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56914_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 56914_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57385_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 57385_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57605_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 57605_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57634_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
Preparing report for the candidate 57634_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57865_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 57865_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57889_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 57889_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57973_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 57973_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58040_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 58040_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58067_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 58067_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58096_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 58096_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58196_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 58196_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58212_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 58212_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58396_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 58396_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51063_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 51063_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12983_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 12983_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50130_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103
The candidate 50130_Vir-06-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-17-41_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0103 did not pass the final checks
