This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 12.62 11:22:58.95 +03:23:35.7
257.41147 58.21842 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.19 Fortuna 0 -0 0 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:58.95 +03:23:35.7: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:58.95 +03:23:35.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 22 58.95 +03 23 35.7 12.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 13.34 11:01:19.84 +03:42:38.7
249.80345 54.79485 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.35 Leukothea -0 -0 1 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:01:19.84 +03:42:38.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:01:19.84 +03:42:38.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 01 19.84 +03 42 38.7 13.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,13.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 13.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 13.36 11:15:41.01 +02:25:01.3
255.99371 56.29837 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.270 Anahita -0 -0 0 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:15:41.01 +02:25:01.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:15:41.01 +02:25:01.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 15 41.01 +02 25 01.3 13.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 13.80 11:05:24.07 +03:58:46.3
250.72475 55.70447 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.356 Liguria -0 0 0 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:05:24.07 +03:58:46.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:05:24.07 +03:58:46.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 05 24.07 +03 58 46.3 13.8 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 13.91 11:12:14.79 +06:04:46.4
250.20052 58.39422 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.136 Austria -0 0 0 14.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:12:14.79 +06:04:46.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:12:14.79 +06:04:46.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 12 14.79 +06 04 46.4 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,13.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 13.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 13.95 11:16:19.68 +08:08:10.4
248.66214 60.54946 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.140 Siwa 0 -0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:16:19.68 +08:08:10.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:16:19.68 +08:08:10.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 16 19.68 +08 08 10.4 13.9 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 14.29 11:00:31.53 +07:58:37.4
243.87204 57.50558 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.2" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:00:31.53 +07:58:37.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:00:31.53 +07:58:37.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:00:31.53 +07:58:37.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 00 31.53 +07 58 37.4 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6697,14.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1697 14.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 14.27 11:34:07.37 +04:42:16.8
260.10026 60.97331 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.3" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:34:07.37 +04:42:16.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:07.37 +04:42:16.8: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:07.37 +04:42:16.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 34 07.37 +04 42 16.8 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6697,14.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1697 14.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 14.49 10:51:26.64 +04:19:22.0
246.16796 53.41190 galactic Sex Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 7.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.554 Peraga -1 -1 2 14.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:51:26.64 +04:19:22.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:51:26.64 +04:19:22.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 10 51 26.64 +04 19 22.0 14.5 U Sex 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,14.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 14.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 14.35 11:14:42.96 +07:02:54.8
249.68741 59.51007 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.90 Antiope 0 0 0 14.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:14:42.96 +07:02:54.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:14:42.96 +07:02:54.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 14 42.96 +07 02 54.8 14.3 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,14.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 14.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 14.39 11:34:37.30 +09:18:25.0
253.81465 64.57425 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.6" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:34:37.30 +09:18:25.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:37.30 +09:18:25.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:37.30 +09:18:25.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 34 37.30 +09 18 25.0 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6697,14.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1697 14.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 14.38 11:28:07.18 +02:35:42.9
260.26844 58.38769 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.189 Phthia -0 -1 1 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:28:07.18 +02:35:42.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:28:07.18 +02:35:42.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 28 07.18 +02 35 42.9 14.4 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6697,14.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1697 14.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1697 2461208.6697 14.63 11:22:06.86 +02:17:18.7
258.40042 57.22416 galactic Leo Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.3" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:22:06.86 +02:17:18.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:06.86 +02:17:18.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:06.86 +02:17:18.7: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1697* 11 22 06.86 +02 17 18.7 14.6 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461208.6697,14.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260617.1697 14.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
First image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Last image: 2461208.66993080 17.06.2026 04:04:32.021 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 4068
Objects passed selection criteria: 4066
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 3806.25
Average stars matched: 3725.75 (97.8851 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 110688 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:15:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
First image: 2461149.73290969 19.04.2026 05:35:13.397 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Last image: 2461208.66993080 17.06.2026 04:04:32.021 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 17 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22485
Objects passed selection criteria: 22445
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25661.5
Average stars matched: 20878 (81.3592 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131500 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 23:17:32 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Leo-07-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Leo-07-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Leo-07-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 110589 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 110589 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits_preview.png'
Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
renamed 'Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.png' -> 'transient_report/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits_preview.png'
Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 598.7799
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 468.7439
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1221.6068
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.7158
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1224.3745
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 464.7441
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.04016
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.1700000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 9.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.3199996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 27.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
No matching dark image found
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): cannot find a good dark frame by running util/find_best_dark.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.66942156
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.290 +06:00:22.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:33.290 +06:00:22.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0572 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:30.364 +06:00:27.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:30.364 +06:00:27.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0663 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:33.290 +06:00:22.15
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:30.364 +06:00:27.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01221 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ED1TYamIRh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l29H9WsbLI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t6rqODxz0e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mgtT1jNU31
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh has not found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
wait
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2590 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3201 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 5626 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.762800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.762800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2590 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1365 to 175.0745 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2590 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3201 out of 3312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3312 out of 5626 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 5579 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1771 to 175.0846 deg, Dec +0.7335 to +11.2823 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1771 to 175.0846 deg, Dec 0.7335 to 11.2823 deg
Loaded 3902 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3209 out of 3301 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3301 out of 5579 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.3 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
2.3 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
2.3 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
14.9 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
14.9 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ED1TYamIRh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=364, passed=5626
Got 5626 stars (including 5255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5626 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5542 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.520 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.476 n_q1=239 n_q2=269 n_q3=213 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.031
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l29H9WsbLI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=5576
Got 5576 stars (including 5240 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5576 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 943 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=943 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.595 n_q1=234 n_q2=264 n_q3=219 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t6rqODxz0e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=341, passed=4421
Got 4421 stars (including 4078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4337 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4340 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=256 n_q2=259 n_q3=215 n_q4=220 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mgtT1jNU31 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=307, passed=4318
Got 4318 stars (including 4006 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4233 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.450 n_q1=258 n_q2=259 n_q3=211 n_q4=222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.249
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.031
ref2=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits sigma_overall=0.490 worst_q_ratio=1.214
new1=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new2=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.249
reference average sigma_overall=0.497 worst_q_ratio=1.1225
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148_astrometric_residuals.png (943 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087_astrometric_residuals.png (950 matched stars from wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:02:12.77 +07:00:50.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:03:26.40 +06:15:10.7: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:07:35.60 +06:31:44.2: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:10:25.12 +06:19:55.8: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:02:11.88 +08:43:27.8: 12.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:09:21.44 +03:20:16.4: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:07:24.07 +05:40:36.0: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:03:26.40 +06:15:10.7: 12.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:07:35.60 +06:31:44.2: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:02:11.88 +08:43:27.8: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:03:26.40 +06:15:10.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1134 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:35.60 +06:31:44.2: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8883 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:10:25.12 +06:19:55.8: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:02:12.77 +07:00:50.5: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:11.88 +08:43:27.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1812 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:07:24.07 +05:40:36.0: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:09:21.44 +03:20:16.4: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:25.12 +06:19:55.8: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9617 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:02:12.77 +07:00:50.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2128 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:24.07 +05:40:36.0: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0664 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:21.44 +03:20:16.4: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5948 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20244_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 20244_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20250_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 20250_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20251_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 20251_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20254_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 20254_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20255_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 20255_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 20267_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20275_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 20275_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:33.290 +06:00:22.15 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:33.290 +06:00:22.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0572 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:08:30.364 +06:00:27.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:08:41.744 +05:57:39.30
Second-epoch image center 11:08:30.364 +06:00:27.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0663 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:08:33.290 +06:00:22.15
Second-epoch second image center 11:08:30.364 +06:00:27.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01221 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits &> /tmp/tmp.junk9TMk5H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0vBVdpeEo5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YS2yGJdH5q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zQ8jslHY1w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits and wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits) and catalog (wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29706 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2606 deg
Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3140 out of 3393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3393 out of 29706 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.633700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.633700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.28
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29706 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec +0.5737 to +11.2606 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1354 to 175.0757 deg, Dec 0.5737 to 11.2606 deg
Loaded 3956 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3140 out of 3393 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3393 out of 29706 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 29098 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.1771 to 175.0866 deg, Dec +0.7306 to +11.2850 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.1771 to 175.0866 deg, Dec 0.7306 to 11.2850 deg
Loaded 3903 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3156 out of 3385 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3385 out of 29098 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 57 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
2.4 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
2.3 pix Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
15.3 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
15.1 mag. Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.junk9TMk5H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1187, passed=29691
Got 29691 stars (including 28463 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29691 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 452 to 508 (Dec 0.6 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 946 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29432 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 946 stars left (next iteration limit 1040)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits N_match=946 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.475 n_q1=228 n_q2=272 n_q3=220 n_q4=226 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0vBVdpeEo5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1226, passed=29086
Got 29086 stars (including 27828 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29086 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 936 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28814 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=235 n_q2=261 n_q3=225 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YS2yGJdH5q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1477, passed=34560
Got 34560 stars (including 33010 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34560 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 900 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33597 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33593 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=265 n_q2=238 n_q3=212 n_q4=205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zQ8jslHY1w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1672, passed=34551
Got 34551 stars (including 32807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34551 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 453 to 508 (Dec 0.7 to 11.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33317 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 920 stars left (next iteration limit 1012)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits N_match=920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=261 n_q2=232 n_q3=213 n_q4=214 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits -region wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-03-48_20.00sec_10.00C_LIGHT_0086.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_231113_TTUQ2b1x1_2324507_C3QRkIs4/wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Leo-07-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:17:48.31 +03:51:37.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:05:37.19 +02:49:15.4: 15.04 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:46.04 +07:44:53.1: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:09:21.44 +03:20:16.3: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:55.62 +02:41:57.3: 14.78 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:10:00.27 +09:56:00.4: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:23:59.07 +05:14:24.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:59:33.10 +10:08:54.8: 14.55 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:18:38.91 +04:33:13.7: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:10:00.27 +09:56:00.4: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:23:59.07 +05:14:24.3: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:59:33.10 +10:08:54.8: 14.51 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:05:37.19 +02:49:15.4: 15.05 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:17:48.31 +03:51:37.4: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:00.27 +09:56:00.4: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6256 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:23:59.07 +05:14:24.3: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5206 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:59:33.10 +10:08:54.8: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4354 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:05:37.19 +02:49:15.4: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6653 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:18:38.91 +04:33:13.7: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:17:48.31 +03:51:37.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0916 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:55.62 +02:41:57.3: 14.76 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:09:21.44 +03:20:16.3: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:46.04 +07:44:53.1: 14.39 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:18:38.91 +04:33:13.7: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1898 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.77 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:21.44 +03:20:16.3: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5430 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:22:46.04 +07:44:53.1: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0575 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:22:55.62 +02:41:57.3: ref_mag=14.77 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6961 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:58.95 +03:23:35.7: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:58.95 +03:23:35.7: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:01:19.84 +03:42:38.7: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:15:41.01 +02:25:01.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:05:24.07 +03:58:46.3: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:12:14.79 +06:04:46.4: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:16:19.68 +08:08:10.4: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:00:31.53 +07:58:37.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:05:24.07 +03:58:46.3: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:01:19.84 +03:42:38.7: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:15:41.01 +02:25:01.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:16:19.68 +08:08:10.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:12:14.79 +06:04:46.4: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:00:31.53 +07:58:37.4: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:15:33.16 +08:39:58.3: 15.74 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:07.37 +04:42:16.8: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:15:33.16 +08:39:58.3: 15.40 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 11:15:33.16 +08:39:58.3: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.4490 delta=1.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:07.37 +04:42:16.8: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 10:51:26.64 +04:19:22.0: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 10:51:26.64 +04:19:22.0: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:14:42.96 +07:02:54.8: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:14:42.96 +07:02:54.8: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:37.30 +09:18:25.0: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:37.30 +09:18:25.0: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:28:07.18 +02:35:42.9: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:25:20.95 +05:28:32.7: 15.21 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:56.72 +07:22:45.8: 15.55 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:07:00.31 +03:55:42.8: 15.29 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:23:46.43 +04:23:45.7: 15.58 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:28:07.18 +02:35:42.9: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:25:20.95 +05:28:32.7: 15.24 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:09:25.67 +07:44:58.6: 15.22 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:20.95 +05:28:32.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6411 delta=0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:56.72 +07:22:45.8: 15.36 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:22:06.86 +02:17:18.7: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:22:56.72 +07:22:45.8: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.6738 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:07:00.31 +03:55:42.8: 15.75 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.43 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:07:00.31 +03:55:42.8: ref_mag=15.43 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.7340 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:23:46.43 +04:23:45.7: 15.27 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:23:46.43 +04:23:45.7: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.6716 delta=0.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:09:25.67 +07:44:58.6: 15.57 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.35 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:09:25.67 +07:44:58.6: ref_mag=15.35 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.7865 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:22:06.86 +02:17:18.7: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:25:51.10 +06:24:21.1: 15.31 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:07.09 +09:29:51.0: 14.86 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:34:06.83 +07:36:51.0: 14.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-04-19_00-35-13_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0503.fits at 11:32:36.18 +03:24:39.6: 15.29 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:25:51.10 +06:24:21.1: 15.28 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:25:51.10 +06:24:21.1: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.7351 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:06.83 +07:36:51.0: 14.86 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:34:07.09 +09:29:51.0: 15.26 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.79 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:06.83 +07:36:51.0: ref_mag=14.79 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8520 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:34:07.09 +09:29:51.0: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7982 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-05-10_23-29-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0148.fits at 11:32:36.18 +03:24:39.6: 15.23 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:32:36.18 +03:24:39.6: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7636 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out35060.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32876.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33308.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33460.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33927.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34290.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34380.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34519.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35112.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35480.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36541.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36752.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38572.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 27s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 9s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32164_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32164_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32180_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32180_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32188_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32188_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32190_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32190_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32197_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32197_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32209_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32209_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32211_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32211_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32215_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32215_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32216_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32216_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:11:59.32 +08:27:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32218_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32218_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32519_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 32519_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32876_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 32876_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33258_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 33258_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:04:58.20 +07:22:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33308_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33308_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33318_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 33318_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:21:16.77 +06:01:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33460_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33460_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33623_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 33623_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:23.87 +09:24:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33927_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 33927_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34290_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 34290_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34380_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 34380_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34519_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 34519_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34659_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 34659_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34670_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 34670_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34823_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 34823_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34962_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 34962_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35018_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 35018_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35060_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 35060_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:15:33.16 +08:39:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.816 3818925529072473984 168.88955316746 +08.66533933264 15.3545 14.7982 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.816#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35112_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 35112_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35199_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 35199_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35267_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 35267_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35480_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 35480_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35865_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 35865_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36011_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 36011_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36521_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 36521_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36541_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 36541_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36559_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 36559_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36752_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 36752_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36986_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 36986_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37030_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 37030_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37386_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 37386_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37498_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 37498_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37631_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 37631_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37733_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 37733_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37772_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 37772_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37796_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 37796_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38128_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 38128_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38265_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 38265_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38269_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 38269_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38419_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 38419_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38572_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
Preparing report for the candidate 38572_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38626_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 38626_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38637_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 38637_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39302_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 39302_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39365_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 39365_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39440_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 39440_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39527_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 39527_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03434_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087
The candidate 03434_Leo-07-Q2b1x1_2026-06-16_23-04-32_20.00sec_9.90C_LIGHT_0087 did not pass the final checks
