NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-08-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-08-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-08-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-08-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 118878 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 118878 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits_preview.png'
UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits

renamed 'UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits_preview.png'
UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 483.7856 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.3741 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 969.1078 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 508.3669 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 968.2596 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 508.1029 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.00318 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-16T22:33:32.4498689' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-17T03:33:32.4498689' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61208.1482922337 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-17T03:33:42.3501429' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61208.1484068288 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 190.587524328328 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9999894812363 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 62.7861111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 325.5375 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.1241074681267 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 42 21' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29496 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29496 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 893.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits :) Spent 0.791214 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-16T22:34:09.3502505' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-17T03:34:09.3502505' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61208.1487193289 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-17T03:34:19.2544447' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61208.1488339584 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 190.587524352585 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 53.9999894789075 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 62.7152777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 325.420833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.12482176467115 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-08' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 42 21' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29496 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29496 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 893.3 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 28.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 20.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 14.801184 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 11.900952 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits :) Spent 0.848358 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/d_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits


fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.64840797 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:25.609 +53:59:53.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 Second-epoch image center 12:42:25.609 +53:59:53.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:26.515 +53:59:45.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 Second-epoch image center 12:42:26.515 +53:59:45.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0123 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:42:25.609 +53:59:53.50 Second-epoch second image center 12:42:26.515 +53:59:45.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00319 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V1t2u1gH95 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eOGy99SjrO Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S7glZ031tY Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.j0hZFIStsq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6316 to +59.4289 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6316 to 59.4289 deg Loaded 5130 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6366 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.895950 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.895950 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.39
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6316 to +59.4289 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6316 to 59.4289 deg Loaded 5130 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6366 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=6.4) Read 6336 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.6315 to +59.4307 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.2135 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.6315 to 59.4307 deg Loaded 5133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3352 out of 3530 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3530 out of 6336 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 2.2 pix UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 2.7 pix fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 15.3 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.V1t2u1gH95 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, passed=6366 Got 6366 stars (including 5928 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6366 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 965 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6318 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6317 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.356 n_q1=229 n_q2=251 n_q3=253 n_q4=240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.eOGy99SjrO (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, passed=6336 Got 6336 stars (including 5899 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6336 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6276 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6277 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 973 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6277 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=973 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.362 n_q1=228 n_q2=253 n_q3=247 n_q4=245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.S7glZ031tY (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=323, passed=6574 Got 6574 stars (including 6241 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6574 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6534 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6535 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6535 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.275 n_q1=246 n_q2=254 n_q3=240 n_q4=227 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.002 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.j0hZFIStsq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=282, passed=6522 Got 6522 stars (including 6232 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6484 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6484 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6484 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=247 n_q2=257 n_q3=239 n_q4=224 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.148 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.245 ref2=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.270 new1=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.002 new2=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.293 worst_q_ratio=1.148 reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.2575 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291_astrometric_residuals.png (973 matched stars from wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (967 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:17:30.46 +49:45:37.8: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:17:30.46 +49:45:37.8: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:30.46 +49:45:37.8: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3190 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20288_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 20288_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    8.23    12:08:09.03 +55:27:52.8   7780 2315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:08:08.95 +55:27:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20440_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 20440_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    11.33    13:17:30.42 +49:45:37.8   1219 5334   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    11.31    13:17:30.50 +49:45:37.8   1221 5333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Image size: 941.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:25.609 +53:59:53.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 Second-epoch image center 12:42:25.609 +53:59:53.50 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0092 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Image size: 940.9'x626.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.88"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 12:42:26.515 +53:59:45.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 12:42:23.795 +54:00:22.66 Second-epoch image center 12:42:26.515 +53:59:45.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0123 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 12:42:25.609 +53:59:53.50 Second-epoch second image center 12:42:26.515 +53:59:45.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00319 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ClRGgTJqoh Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits &> /tmp/tmp.upRi9h930v Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kzeMzfkA3s Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2IWdsC1Pov Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits and wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 32060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.5911 to +59.4389 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.5911 to 59.4389 deg Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3548 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3548 out of 32060 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.793900 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.793900 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 32060 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec +47.5911 to +59.4389 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0420 to 205.0231 deg, Dec 47.5911 to 59.4389 deg Loaded 5176 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3207 out of 3548 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3548 out of 32060 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits (aperture=5.1) Read 32020 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 175.0423 to 205.0230 deg, Dec +47.5909 to +59.4403 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 175.0423 to 205.0230 deg, Dec 47.5909 to 59.4403 deg Loaded 5177 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3222 out of 3544 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3544 out of 32020 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits (aperture=5.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 122 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 2.1 pix UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 2.6 pix fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 2.1 pix wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 15.5 mag. UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 15.4 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 15.4 mag. fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ClRGgTJqoh (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=1385, passed=32036 Got 32036 stars (including 30591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32036 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31726 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=223 n_q2=243 n_q3=257 n_q4=247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.241 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.upRi9h930v (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=1380, passed=31995 Got 31995 stars (including 30556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31995 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31655 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 687 to 749 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31654 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31656 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=226 n_q2=243 n_q3=252 n_q4=249 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.331 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits -region wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.kzeMzfkA3s (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=8, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1140, passed=29713 Got 29713 stars (including 28526 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29713 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29507 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29508 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 967 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29508 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits N_match=967 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.284 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=247 n_q2=256 n_q3=232 n_q4=232 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.004 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2IWdsC1Pov (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=1086, passed=29647 Got 29647 stars (including 28509 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29647 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 961 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29509 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29509 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 966 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29509 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits N_match=966 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=243 n_q2=260 n_q3=235 n_q4=228 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/wcs_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:17:30.48 +49:45:37.9: 11.18 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:19:48.12 +55:56:54.0: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:15:13.38 +49:37:07.9: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:17:30.48 +49:45:37.9: 11.17 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.18 +/- 0.00 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:17:30.48 +49:45:37.9: ref_mag=11.18 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3684 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:19:48.12 +55:56:54.0: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:19:48.12 +55:56:54.0: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9545 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:15:13.38 +49:37:07.9: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:15:13.38 +49:37:07.9: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1940 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:25:55.74 +54:33:46.9: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:25:55.74 +54:33:46.9: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:25:55.74 +54:33:46.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6519 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:44:01.81 +55:29:57.7: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:44:01.81 +55:29:57.7: 14.29 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:44:01.81 +55:29:57.7: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3169 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:37:49.96 +58:12:03.1: 14.63 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:01:38.75 +50:04:31.2: 14.62 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:16:24.67 +56:16:48.4: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:03:31.85 +56:58:18.5: 15.26 +/- 0.18 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:10:57.16 +52:39:23.1: 14.54 +/- 0.09 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:37:49.96 +58:12:03.1: 14.67 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:37:49.96 +58:12:03.1: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7411 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:01:38.75 +50:04:31.2: 14.82 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:37:02.58 +56:51:28.8: 14.62 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.08 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:01:38.75 +50:04:31.2: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6851 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:16:24.67 +56:16:48.4: 14.96 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:24.67 +56:16:48.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7274 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:24:18.89 +53:50:35.9: 14.86 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:03:31.85 +56:58:18.5: 15.32 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:31.85 +56:58:18.5: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8847 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:03:02.82 +49:24:14.6: 15.33 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:10:57.16 +52:39:23.1: 14.70 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.61 +/- 0.07 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:10:57.16 +52:39:23.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8737 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:37:02.58 +56:51:28.8: 15.18 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:37:02.58 +56:51:28.8: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.8656 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:24:18.89 +53:50:35.9: 14.85 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:22:18.70 +53:17:58.8: 14.76 +/- 0.12 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:24:18.89 +53:50:35.9: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9465 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:03:02.82 +49:24:14.6: 14.84 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:03:02.82 +49:24:14.6: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9878 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 12:18:44.62 +54:38:24.4: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:23:11.08 +50:43:26.3: 14.88 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:15:45.67 +56:10:06.8: 15.17 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:22:18.70 +53:17:58.8: 15.07 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:18.70 +53:17:58.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9297 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:16:26.53 +54:49:52.4: 15.24 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-44-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0290.fits at 13:34:20.55 +54:56:21.1: 15.60 +/- 0.28 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 12:18:44.62 +54:38:24.4: 14.93 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:15:45.67 +56:10:06.8: 15.35 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:23:11.08 +50:43:26.3: 15.02 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.00 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:18:44.62 +54:38:24.4: ref_mag=15.00 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9202 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:15:45.67 +56:10:06.8: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9120 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:23:11.08 +50:43:26.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9228 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:16:26.53 +54:49:52.4: 15.36 +/- 0.20 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:16:26.53 +54:49:52.4: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.9944 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-45-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0291.fits at 13:34:20.55 +54:56:21.1: 14.81 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:34:20.55 +54:56:21.1: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.7962 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52187_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52187_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.61    12:10:15.68 +53:43:58.6   7651 3372   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:10:15.55 +53:43:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52189_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52189_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.27    12:15:13.35 +49:37:09.1   7290 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.14    12:15:13.40 +49:37:06.8   7291 5881   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52282_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52282_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    10.75    11:50:54.53 +57:34:19.1   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52344_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52344_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    11.36    13:17:30.47 +49:45:37.8   1219 5334   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    11.37    13:17:30.49 +49:45:37.9   1221 5333   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52366_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52366_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    11.50    13:17:41.84 +57:01:15.2   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52401_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52401_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    11.75    12:32:17.90 +56:31:53.8   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52402_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52402_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    11.82    12:19:34.43 +49:00:00.6   6870 6266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:19:34.43 +49:00:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52424_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52424_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    11.93    13:19:48.04 +55:56:53.9   1728 1610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    11.98    13:19:48.20 +55:56:54.1   1730 1608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52451_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52451_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.13    12:38:54.93 +51:09:14.4   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52476_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52476_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.21    11:52:01.44 +53:08:49.5   9337 3591   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52494_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52494_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.36    12:06:27.65 +52:58:48.1   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52575_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52575_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.69    11:55:17.87 +51:50:43.3   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52589_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52589_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.69    12:12:54.21 +53:50:45.3   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52590_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52590_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.72    12:54:10.88 +49:12:08.8   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52591_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52591_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.69    12:41:41.91 +56:48:51.7   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52597_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52597_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.62    12:49:47.44 +57:07:28.9   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52606_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52606_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.83    12:35:28.10 +58:55:46.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52635_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52635_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.85    12:59:38.55 +51:26:53.9   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52656_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52656_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    12.94    12:11:05.00 +50:29:08.6   7673 5340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:11:04.99 +50:29:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52707_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52707_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.08    12:48:19.82 +49:26:24.4   4039 5898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52730_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52730_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.11    11:56:57.03 +49:29:51.1   9108 5854   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 11:56:56.94 +49:29:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52775_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52775_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.25    12:36:08.72 +50:06:20.3   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52806_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52806_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.48    12:25:07.51 +50:25:18.0   6318 5403   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52828_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52828_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.43    12:05:22.88 +50:21:12.1   8232 5392   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:05:22.93 +50:21:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52862_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52862_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.52    12:43:28.34 +48:55:23.7   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52866_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52866_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.55    13:38:19.28 +57:50:45.4   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52911_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52911_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.66    12:35:15.13 +50:21:15.3   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52943_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52943_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.68    13:14:56.76 +49:35:58.9   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52949_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52949_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.51    12:55:32.25 +56:10:12.0   3777 1793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:55:32.23 +56:10:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52955_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 52955_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    13.65    13:25:55.76 +54:33:47.2   1034 2321   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.65    13:25:55.71 +54:33:46.6   1035 2320   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53011_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53011_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.78    12:22:52.59 +53:20:12.0   6523 3642   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:22:52.60 +53:20:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53071_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53071_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.72    12:42:22.94 +54:42:20.8   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53124_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53124_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.05    13:26:30.44 +54:13:42.6   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53149_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53149_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.93    13:26:04.27 +55:52:54.2   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53174_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53174_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.27    13:28:06.10 +50:51:07.9   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53178_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53178_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.04    12:37:53.03 +57:09:37.0   5281 1312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53194_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53194_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.22    11:54:06.34 +53:20:24.7   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53210_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53210_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    13.99    11:58:17.48 +56:19:38.5   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53215_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53215_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.07    12:46:22.63 +59:00:39.7   4674 0150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53228_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53228_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.12    12:51:37.87 +50:54:34.5   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53247_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53247_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.26    12:33:58.50 +55:56:40.0   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53275_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53275_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.12    13:25:53.35 +48:59:30.4   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53301_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53301_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.34    13:30:18.89 +51:08:00.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53355_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53355_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.50    13:29:43.86 +52:00:30.5   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53391_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53391_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.32    12:21:39.11 +53:49:55.8   6630 3342   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:21:39.25 +53:49:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53409_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53409_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.16    12:19:55.72 +53:32:43.6   6787 3513   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:19:55.69 +53:32:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53412_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53412_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.01    13:34:35.07 +55:00:50.0   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53433_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53433_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.35    13:26:54.72 +52:55:31.8   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53486_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53486_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.30    13:04:09.41 +57:46:43.0   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53493_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53493_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.35    12:44:01.82 +55:29:57.9   4709 2284   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.29    12:44:01.79 +55:29:57.4   4711 2283   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53494_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53494_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.37    13:36:48.63 +55:51:45.9   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53496_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53496_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.71    12:29:46.98 +51:19:27.3   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53510_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53510_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.60    12:11:33.22 +56:45:44.1   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53532_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53532_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.34    13:32:29.20 +52:40:56.0   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53539_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53539_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.58    11:58:54.78 +49:07:08.6   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53540_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53540_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.64    12:57:31.91 +49:43:55.1   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53541_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53541_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.42    13:21:13.21 +56:53:11.0   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53543_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53543_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.44    11:55:21.68 +52:21:29.3   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53561_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53561_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.34    13:31:33.99 +57:56:51.8   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53573_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53573_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.42    12:33:54.78 +56:38:16.9   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53584_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53584_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.61    13:20:43.20 +58:08:22.1   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53587_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53587_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.45    13:31:02.56 +56:37:36.6   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53590_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53590_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.42    13:20:47.65 +53:53:22.6   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53594_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53594_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.40    11:56:19.44 +49:15:55.1   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53597_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53597_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.40    13:19:30.46 +53:23:25.9   1455 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53606_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53606_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.44    13:25:18.81 +54:41:20.7   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53612_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53612_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.58    11:54:10.91 +53:35:52.2   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53614_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53614_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.67    12:05:35.15 +49:37:31.4   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53624_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53624_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.48    13:30:16.78 +56:07:39.7   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53658_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53658_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.71    13:28:09.46 +56:51:16.0   1152 0919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53683_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53683_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.82    12:08:12.20 +49:18:07.5   7996 6048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53692_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53692_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.57    13:27:27.45 +56:35:55.9   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53704_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53704_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.94    12:07:02.28 +49:18:14.7   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53725_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53725_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.63    13:21:29.07 +49:03:28.6   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53729_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53729_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.87    12:12:02.77 +56:22:49.8   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53738_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53738_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.38    13:06:39.77 +49:18:32.5   2233 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53747_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53747_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.21    13:34:32.51 +54:32:03.7   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53750_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53750_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.76    12:05:15.87 +52:11:17.2   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53757_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53757_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    15.03    12:04:57.42 +52:43:03.7   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53795_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53795_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.63    12:56:57.39 +57:12:36.0   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53796_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53796_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.49    12:08:34.32 +56:26:45.1   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53813_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53813_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.87    12:40:24.07 +57:51:16.3   5099 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53814_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53814_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.65    12:33:27.62 +58:53:43.3   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53826_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53826_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.72    12:37:49.76 +58:12:02.9   5314 0684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.79    12:37:50.17 +58:12:03.3   5315 0683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53829_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53829_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.78    13:08:59.00 +56:10:12.2   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53831_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53831_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.60    13:10:31.60 +49:28:50.6   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53861_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53861_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.70    13:01:38.47 +50:04:32.5   2785 5380   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.67    13:01:39.03 +50:04:29.9   2786 5379   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53879_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53879_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.92    12:04:55.21 +51:06:19.3   8244 4933   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53881_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53881_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.82    12:55:47.87 +49:21:07.4   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53886_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53886_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    15.09    12:13:54.02 +50:28:02.9   7401 5361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53898_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53898_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.75    12:50:44.08 +50:21:18.8   3855 5325   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits **** FOUND 12:50:44.12 +50:21:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53915_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53915_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.70    12:44:49.48 +59:05:24.7   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53918_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53918_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.72    13:16:24.50 +56:16:49.0   2048 1467   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.74    13:16:24.84 +56:16:47.8   2049 1466   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53939_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53939_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    15.08    13:17:46.41 +49:54:32.6   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53943_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53943_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.82    12:47:21.82 +52:41:56.2   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53944_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53944_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.85    12:03:31.98 +56:58:20.3   8109 1377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.95    12:03:31.71 +56:58:16.7   8111 1376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53952_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53952_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.75    13:34:48.30 +53:39:19.2   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53953_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53953_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.80    13:10:57.14 +52:39:23.1   2144 3709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.98    13:10:57.17 +52:39:23.1   2146 3708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53972_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53972_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.87    12:06:11.74 +52:33:50.9   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53980_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53980_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.84    13:37:02.76 +56:51:29.2   0425 0734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.92    13:37:02.40 +56:51:28.4   0427 0734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53999_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 53999_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.89    12:13:12.69 +57:23:49.7   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54006_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54006_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.54    13:13:26.05 +49:13:07.1   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54011_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54011_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.88    12:15:53.82 +50:04:29.1   7216 5605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54020_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54020_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    15.10    12:41:07.17 +52:58:45.6   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54021_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54021_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.95    12:07:39.64 +57:45:02.7   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54023_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54023_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.85    13:24:18.78 +53:50:36.1   1082 2778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    15.10    13:24:19.00 +53:50:35.6   1083 2777   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54033_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54033_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.95    12:03:02.88 +49:24:14.2   8503 5958   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    15.04    12:03:02.76 +49:24:15.1   8505 5956   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54045_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54045_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    15.03    13:11:21.49 +51:07:42.3   1956 4614   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54056_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54056_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    15.06    12:35:45.29 +54:10:51.8   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54071_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54071_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.90    13:22:18.65 +53:17:59.3   1192 3138   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.97    13:22:18.76 +53:17:58.4   1193 3137   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54079_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54079_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.80    12:59:32.67 +58:41:48.4   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54091_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54091_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.98    11:59:52.25 +49:49:02.4   8799 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54124_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54124_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.67    12:23:30.42 +58:06:24.9   6456 0761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54131_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54131_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.93    13:23:10.99 +50:43:25.8   0790 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.92    13:23:11.16 +50:43:26.7   0791 4652   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54154_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54154_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.94    12:18:44.62 +54:38:24.6   6878 2852   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.91    12:18:44.62 +54:38:24.2   6879 2851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54155_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54155_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.90    12:57:43.71 +52:59:32.2   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54161_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54161_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.97    13:15:45.66 +56:10:05.9   2090 1544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.86    13:15:45.67 +56:10:07.7   2091 1543   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54171_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54171_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.90    13:25:43.66 +54:49:33.5   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54190_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54190_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.72    13:29:53.33 +57:33:27.1   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54203_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54203_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.93    13:36:29.13 +54:44:26.2   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54204_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54204_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    15.01    13:16:26.41 +54:49:52.4   1886 2329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.98    13:16:26.64 +54:49:52.4   1887 2328   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54205_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 The candidate 54205_fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 06 17.14841    2461208.64841    14.89    13:34:20.66 +54:56:19.3   0360 1927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-33-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0054.fits Discovery image 2   2026 06 17.14884    2461208.64884    14.77    13:34:20.43 +54:56:23.0   0362 1925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_224921_TTUQ1b1x1_4059594_eNxIX8cn/fd_UMa-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-34-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0055.fits make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 4s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-08-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461208.64840797 -observatory V36 07:27:20.53 +22:42:16.8 Mercury (0.6mag) 08:27:01.59 +21:14:08.2 Venus (-4.0mag) 03:15:43.95 +17:37:22.2 Mars (1.3mag) 07:56:02.17 +21:11:42.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:43.94 +03:01:15.5 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:02:18.19 +20:31:26.3 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:35.51 +00:19:13.3 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:48.11 -23:08:02.9 Pluto (14.5mag) 07:43:48.19 +23:42:46.3 Moon (-8.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 16 22:51 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461208.64840797: 07:56:05.69 +21:11:33.6 Io (6.2mag) 07:56:02.94 +21:11:39.1 Europa (6.3mag) 07:56:01.48 +21:11:50.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:55:52.21 +21:12:20.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 07:55:47.60 +20:49:04.1 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:56:03.19 +21:11:39.4 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:55:32.27 +21:00:44.7 Elara (17.6mag) 07:58:39.39 +21:18:30.8 Pasiphae (17.8mag) 08:02:12.71 +21:14:09.1 Carme (18.9mag) 00:51:51.89 +03:01:33.2 Titan (8.6mag) 00:51:41.03 +03:01:28.3 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:52:04.79 +03:03:47.1 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:51:57.93 +03:01:21.4 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:52:15.04 +03:01:53.9 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 16 22:51 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461208.64840797: 17:28:48.24 -35:35:43.0 JWST 17:50:37.20 +37:09:48.6 Chandra 08:20:36.33 -45:04:44.9 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 16 22:51 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461208.64840797 -observatory V36 18:36:52.61 -33:16:10.4 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 06:02:21.45 -68:00:05.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:52:22.39 +32:05:20.7 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:11:10.19 +15:43:43.8 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 22:40:41.14 -41:15:42.1 16.1mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:10:12.21 +31:54:08.8 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:44:58.16 +27:00:33.9 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:36:23.98 +30:45:13.6 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:55:31.15 +04:19:22.8 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:22:18.43 +21:42:09.6 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:16:24.14 -11:02:46.1 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:10:20.19 +67:01:45.6 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:24:05.75 -07:35:56.5 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:16:50.03 +80:54:23.3 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:23:17.75 +64:38:04.4 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 07:00:37.00 +28:34:16.5 13.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:30:31.60 +14:13:46.3 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:06:16.63 +33:44:01.2 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:26:59.24 -15:12:56.9 15.9mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:14:11.88 +32:57:11.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:32:16.27 +52:12:27.2 17.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:54:51.40 -11:18:00.3 14.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:31:56.66 +23:11:03.7 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:55.11 +04:36:34.6 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 17:55:51.59 +76:52:13.4 17.7mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:15:29.25 +44:00:52.5 16.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:13:49.21 -00:50:33.0 16.6mag A/2026 E1 20:39:44.95 -09:28:49.1 8.3mag 10P/Tempel 11:04:25.42 -01:07:54.2 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:25:30.91 +26:48:51.6 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:19:04.27 +21:09:47.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:34:11.87 -05:50:52.2 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:12:32.70 +34:08:14.3 17.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:30:54.18 +18:16:42.6 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:39:36.86 +06:42:18.9 15.7mag 88P/Howell 05:23:24.29 +30:48:16.1 15.3mag 93P/Lovas 03:08:51.31 +28:57:22.6 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:12:04.05 +32:37:34.6 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:05:55.14 +10:49:32.4 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos 04:13:48.84 +19:48:21.2 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:51:18.83 +19:25:50.9 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 06:35:04.54 +17:27:09.0 15.8mag 141P/Machholz 06:38:20.82 +17:54:08.5 15.7mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:37:56.66 +17:06:05.0 12.6mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:03:48.40 -23:31:23.1 16.5mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 04:11:28.77 +27:12:38.7 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:34:18.75 +04:34:49.3 16.4mag 169P/NEAT 00:42:14.15 +04:08:51.0 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:45:45.03 -08:09:22.1 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR 07:54:47.05 +35:02:53.1 17.6mag 240P/NEAT 00:56:01.09 +01:25:19.6 16.2mag 260P/McNaught 04:29:01.91 +34:00:29.7 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:41:14.51 +00:22:38.3 17.8mag 320P/McNaught 15:11:35.75 +07:42:48.9 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:14:26.21 +20:29:50.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:14:33.69 +41:02:42.1 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 16 22:51 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.97 -54:34:58.00 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.32 16.11 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.52 -16:06:06.00 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.28 16.29 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.01 -27:29:20.10 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.29 -2.7 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 2026-06-15.39 15.93 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:35.90 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 14.93 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.81 -27:51:50.40 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.28 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.79 -63:44:05.60 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-28.12 13.14 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 16 22:51 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag 09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 16 22:51 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 17:06:48.379 +56:34:34.28 AT 2026orx 2026-06-09.06 19.96 15:50:02.310 +47:40:40.67 AT 2026orw 2026-06-06.100 20.04 15:13:24.305 +58:43:44.69 AT 2026orv 2026-06-05.81 20.34 16:25:01.930 +43:59:23.83 AT 2026oru 2026-06-08.86 20.51 15:54:39.489 +41:09:29.50 AT 2026ort 2026-06-08.88 18.75 16:16:12.071 +25:03:21.02 AT 2026ors 2026-06-08.83 20.53 17:19:04.503 +56:21:42.34 AT 2026orr 2026-06-08.99 19.83 18:30:49.765 +57:45:58.06 AT 2026orq 2026-06-09.01 19.79 13:40:26.067 -11:21:43.50 AT 2026orp 2026-06-08.28 20.09 15:02:17.243 +11:30:39.84 SN 2026oro 2026-06-08.90 19.6 20:32:51.763 -17:28:15.13 AT 2026orn 2026-06-08.40 19.8995 18:26:03.894 +06:52:13.31 SN 2026orm 2026-06-05.40 19.9511 15:19:54.474 -05:15:35.34 AT 2026orl 2026-06-05.29 20.4729 16:48:14.469 +09:43:54.56 AT 2026ork 2026-06-04.32 20.4962 16:59:25.266 +10:04:12.29 AT 2026orj 2026-06-02.32 20.2512 22:23:57.401 -15:57:03.56 AT 2026ori 2026-06-08.34 18.404 01:10:30.859 -15:42:02.22 AT 2026orh 2026-06-08.38 18.798 03:37:52.708 -40:33:25.59 AT 2026org 2026-06-08.42 18.082 01:17:41.604 -35:51:10.82 SN 2026orf 2026-06-08.41 18.819 15:44:29.671 +21:00:58.54 SN 2026ore 2026-06-08.39 19.148 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 16 22:51 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 93 C