This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1442 2461208.6442 13.54 13:19:52.49 +05:53:42.1
321.87535 67.71483 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.369 Aeria 0 0 0 13.7 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:19:52.49 +05:53:42.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:19:52.49 +05:53:42.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1442* 13 19 52.49 +05 53 42.1 13.5 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6442,13.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1442 13.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1442 2461208.6442 13.73 14:05:41.68 +02:21:57.3
341.76599 59.51752 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1943 Anteros 0 -1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:05:41.68 +02:21:57.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:05:41.68 +02:21:57.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1442* 14 05 41.68 +02 21 57.3 13.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6442,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1442 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1442 2461208.6442 14.33 13:40:12.33 +02:59:37.7
330.81460 63.19455 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.593 Titania 0 0 0 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:40:12.33 +02:59:37.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:40:12.33 +02:59:37.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1442* 13 40 12.33 +02 59 37.7 14.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6442,14.33,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1442 14.33CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 17.1442 2461208.6442 14.74 13:32:06.06 +08:17:04.5
331.86900 68.84023 galactic Vir Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.888 Parysatis 2 -0 2 14.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:32:06.06 +08:17:04.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:32:06.06 +08:17:04.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 17.1442* 13 32 06.06 +08 17 04.5 14.7 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461208.6442,14.74,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260617.1442 14.74CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84378448 16.04.2026 08:14:52.979 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
First image: 2461146.84378448 16.04.2026 08:14:52.979 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Last image: 2461208.64450230 17.06.2026 03:27:54.999 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5841
Objects passed selection criteria: 5838
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5640
Average stars matched: 5557 (98.5284 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111736 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 22:44:15 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.84378448 16.04.2026 08:14:52.979 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
First image: 2461146.84378448 16.04.2026 08:14:52.979 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Last image: 2461208.64450230 17.06.2026 03:27:54.999 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 47
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 33919
Objects passed selection criteria: 33824
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 32999.8
Average stars matched: 31885 (96.6219 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135376 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Tue Jun 16 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-100-g8a7e82c2
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-16)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Jun 16 22:46:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461208.64384646
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:57.869 +05:57:54.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:35.993 +06:00:33.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:57.869 +05:57:54.39
Second-epoch image center 13:42:35.993 +06:00:33.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1009 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:39.189 +06:01:02.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:57.869 +05:57:54.39
Second-epoch image center 13:42:39.189 +06:01:02.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0934 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:35.993 +06:00:33.76
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:39.189 +06:01:02.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01548 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VvcRQwFNw7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MnCNlo5WIB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5TzNZMWdZ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.imuTn0CnmJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6037 to 214.0559 deg, Dec +0.2173 to +11.6259 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6037 to 214.0559 deg, Dec 0.2173 to 11.6259 deg
Loaded 4449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3353 out of 3481 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3481 out of 5986 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.57
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6037 to 214.0559 deg, Dec +0.2173 to +11.6259 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6037 to 214.0559 deg, Dec 0.2173 to 11.6259 deg
Loaded 4449 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3353 out of 3481 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3481 out of 5986 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5814 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.6040 to 213.9612 deg, Dec +0.2529 to +11.5707 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.6040 to 213.9612 deg, Dec 0.2529 to 11.5707 deg
Loaded 4391 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3378 out of 3481 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3481 out of 5814 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.1 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
2.2 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
15.3 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VvcRQwFNw7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=386, passed=5986
Got 5986 stars (including 5594 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5986 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=244 n_q2=232 n_q3=250 n_q4=254 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MnCNlo5WIB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=355, passed=5814
Got 5814 stars (including 5449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5814 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=247 n_q2=228 n_q3=251 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5TzNZMWdZ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=314, passed=5454
Got 5454 stars (including 5133 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 969 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5389 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=240 n_q2=234 n_q3=250 n_q4=255 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.imuTn0CnmJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=329, passed=5434
Got 5434 stars (including 5095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5434 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 509 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5368 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.264 n_q1=240 n_q2=234 n_q3=248 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.172
ref2=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.254
new1=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.094
new2=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.195
reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.213
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259_astrometric_residuals.png (980 matched stars from wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046_astrometric_residuals.png (979 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:45:45.76 +06:22:03.6: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:45:45.76 +06:22:03.6: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:45:45.76 +06:22:03.6: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3150 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20252_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 20252_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:57.869 +05:57:54.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:35.993 +06:00:33.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:57.869 +05:57:54.39
Second-epoch image center 13:42:35.993 +06:00:33.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1009 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:39.189 +06:01:02.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:57.869 +05:57:54.39
Second-epoch image center 13:42:39.189 +06:01:02.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0934 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:42:35.993 +06:00:33.76
Second-epoch second image center 13:42:39.189 +06:01:02.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01548 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kOXrkPjFw8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gTABLL3Rd3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Sh7jqne88s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7tICIn6IeS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 34813 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.5457 to 214.0696 deg, Dec +0.1968 to +11.6784 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.5457 to 214.0696 deg, Dec 0.1968 to 11.6784 deg
Loaded 4490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3267 out of 3509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3509 out of 34813 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.745700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.745700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 34813 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.5457 to 214.0696 deg, Dec +0.1968 to +11.6784 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.5457 to 214.0696 deg, Dec 0.1968 to 11.6784 deg
Loaded 4490 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3267 out of 3509 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3509 out of 34813 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 34177 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 197.5769 to 214.0155 deg, Dec +0.2529 to +11.6309 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 197.5769 to 214.0155 deg, Dec 0.2529 to 11.6309 deg
Loaded 4428 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3296 out of 3519 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3519 out of 34177 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 43 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.0 pix Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
15.4 mag. Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.kOXrkPjFw8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1275, passed=34792
Got 34792 stars (including 33449 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34792 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34284 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 450 to 510 (Dec 0.2 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 979 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34283 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 979 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 979 stars left (next iteration limit 1076)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits N_match=979 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.278 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=239 n_q2=229 n_q3=250 n_q4=261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gTABLL3Rd3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=1151, passed=34155
Got 34155 stars (including 32942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34155 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 971 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33721 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33718 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=245 n_q2=232 n_q3=255 n_q4=246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Sh7jqne88s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1057, passed=31971
Got 31971 stars (including 30860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31971 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31625 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31626 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=243 n_q2=231 n_q3=252 n_q4=251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7tICIn6IeS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=957, passed=32022
Got 32022 stars (including 30995 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32022 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 451 to 510 (Dec 0.3 to 11.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31614 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=245 n_q2=230 n_q3=248 n_q4=253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.222
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-26-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0046.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-16_CI_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_223922_TTUQ1b1x1_3318791_83McGCxX/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:05:41.68 +02:21:57.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:55:55.47 +07:00:44.4: 14.23 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:09:39.55 +02:51:29.2: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:10.87 +08:03:09.0: 14.34 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:19:52.49 +05:53:42.1: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:50:36.20 +07:23:45.2: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:29:18.36 +03:08:35.4: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:29.05 +05:57:31.3: 11.08 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:20:18.33 +07:56:10.0: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:40:12.33 +02:59:37.7: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:05:41.68 +02:21:57.3: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:29:18.36 +03:08:35.4: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:55:55.47 +07:00:44.4: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:06:29.05 +05:57:31.3: 11.15 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:06:10.87 +08:03:09.0: 14.32 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:19:52.49 +05:53:42.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:09:39.55 +02:51:29.2: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:50:36.20 +07:23:45.2: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.11 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:55:55.47 +07:00:44.4: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2603 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:29:18.36 +03:08:35.4: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0255 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:29.05 +05:57:31.3: ref_mag=11.11 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6050 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:10.87 +08:03:09.0: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2473 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:50:36.20 +07:23:45.2: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9662 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:09:39.55 +02:51:29.2: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7874 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:40:12.33 +02:59:37.7: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:20:18.33 +07:56:10.0: 14.30 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:18.33 +07:56:10.0: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5300 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:00:26.92 +07:02:11.3: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:13:39.75 +08:11:49.3: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:57:49.76 +04:20:44.9: 14.67 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:07:00.17 +10:27:45.6: 14.58 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:12:10.94 +03:09:35.8: 15.11 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:34:04.84 +04:27:29.1: 14.52 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:49:09.00 +06:28:28.8: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:00:26.92 +07:02:11.3: 14.45 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.32 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:13:39.75 +08:11:49.3: 14.81 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:00:26.92 +07:02:11.3: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5168 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:57:49.76 +04:20:44.9: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:13:39.75 +08:11:49.3: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5696 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.70 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:57:49.76 +04:20:44.9: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5253 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:07:00.17 +10:27:45.6: 14.52 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:12:10.94 +03:09:35.8: 15.01 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:00.17 +10:27:45.6: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7230 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:34:04.84 +04:27:29.1: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:10.94 +03:09:35.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6900 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:34:04.84 +04:27:29.1: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5329 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:49:09.00 +06:28:28.8: 14.41 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:49:09.00 +06:28:28.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5471 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:44:17.88 +06:04:33.3: 14.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:11:43.20 +01:06:18.3: 15.03 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:32:06.06 +08:17:04.5: 16.16 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:08:37.22 +04:13:42.2: 14.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:53:07.95 +01:24:29.3: 15.48 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:06:08.12 +09:45:17.7: 15.16 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:44:17.88 +06:04:33.3: 14.75 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:20:29.58 +01:38:45.3: 15.17 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.68 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:44:17.88 +06:04:33.3: ref_mag=14.68 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7493 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:11:43.20 +01:06:18.3: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:32:06.06 +08:17:04.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:11:43.20 +01:06:18.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7156 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:53:07.95 +01:24:29.3: 14.83 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:08:37.22 +04:13:42.2: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:06:08.12 +09:45:17.7: 15.37 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:53:07.95 +01:24:29.3: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8741 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:37.22 +04:13:42.2: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7088 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:06:08.12 +09:45:17.7: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8768 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:20:29.58 +01:38:45.3: 14.95 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:29.58 +01:38:45.3: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7586 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:08:55.99 +06:24:43.6: 15.24 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:20:33.84 +06:29:20.1: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:07:39.22 +07:45:22.3: 15.19 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:21:25.12 +05:32:41.5: 14.89 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:36.80 +01:56:08.9: 15.11 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:51:28.42 +01:20:53.2: 14.64 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:08:55.99 +06:24:43.6: 15.01 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:08:55.99 +06:24:43.6: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9333 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:20:33.84 +06:29:20.1: 14.92 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:20:33.84 +06:29:20.1: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9383 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:07:39.22 +07:45:22.3: 14.95 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:21:25.12 +05:32:41.5: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:39.22 +07:45:22.3: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9506 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:01:36.80 +01:56:08.9: 14.99 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.93 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:25.12 +05:32:41.5: ref_mag=14.93 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9220 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.05 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:36.80 +01:56:08.9: ref_mag=15.05 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7822 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:51:28.42 +01:20:53.2: 14.48 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:51:28.42 +01:20:53.2: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.8814 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:27:02.81 +01:51:42.4: 15.17 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:21:39.61 +01:55:03.5: 15.37 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:01:17.80 +01:32:22.0: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:22:19.99 +04:39:21.3: 15.30 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 14:07:47.17 +03:50:55.6: 15.15 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:54:40.39 +04:26:24.5: 15.42 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:27:02.81 +01:51:42.4: 15.35 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.25 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:27:02.81 +01:51:42.4: ref_mag=15.25 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8139 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:21:39.61 +01:55:03.5: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.37 +/- 0.22
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:21:39.61 +01:55:03.5: ref_mag=15.37 +/- 0.22 new_mean_mag=14.9612 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:01:17.80 +01:32:22.0: 14.82 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:22:19.99 +04:39:21.3: 15.12 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 14:07:47.17 +03:50:55.6: 15.00 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:01:17.80 +01:32:22.0: ref_mag=14.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7215 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:22:19.99 +04:39:21.3: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9567 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:07:47.17 +03:50:55.6: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.9111 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:54:40.39 +04:26:24.5: 15.21 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.30 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:54:40.39 +04:26:24.5: ref_mag=15.30 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.9513 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:47:29.93 +03:16:42.6: 15.01 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_03-14-52_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0259.fits at 13:54:10.69 +02:12:26.9: 15.00 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:47:29.93 +03:16:42.6: 14.95 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-05-17_00-48-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0204.fits at 13:54:10.69 +02:12:26.9: 14.97 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:47:29.93 +03:16:42.6: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8163 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:54:10.69 +02:12:26.9: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.7613 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52711.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52726.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52848.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52979.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52632_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52632_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:32:24.27 +11:06:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52650_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52650_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52680_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52687_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52711_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
Preparing report for the candidate 52711_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52724_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52724_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:04:19.49 +02:35:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
Preparing report for the candidate 52726_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52742_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52742_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52796_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52796_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52808_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52808_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52846_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52846_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52848_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
Preparing report for the candidate 52848_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52874_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52874_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52881_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:11:14.58 +01:42:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52900_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52901_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52901_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:17:35.84 +05:42:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52914_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52914_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52923_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52923_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:44:16.30 +06:02:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52925_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52925_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52928_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52928_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52933_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52933_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52935_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52935_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52952_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52952_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52977_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52979_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
Preparing report for the candidate 52979_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52981_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52981_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52992_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52995_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 52996_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53013_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53032_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53037_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53039_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53043_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53045_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53045_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53053_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53053_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53073_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53073_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53077_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53077_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53080_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53080_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53081_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53104_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53104_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53110_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53110_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53113_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047
The candidate 53113_fd_Vir-04-Q1b1x1_2026-06-16_22-27-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0047 did not pass the final checks