This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.09 23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9
112.88366 -6.04934 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1994495916484080896 | 23:40:08.82 +55:25:36.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 23 40 13.33 +55 25 36.9 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1994495916484080896,2461206.8397,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1994495916484080896 20260615.3397 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 11.37 00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8
117.90063 -12.37216 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 20 40.55 +50 11 55.8 11.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.8397,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.3397 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 11.50 23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6
113.77583 -5.09880 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.0" and 7.1 pix
The object was found in VSX11" Z Cas
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.200 V 15.500 V 2457305.00000 492.300000000000 M7e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 23 44 32.52 +56 34 44.6 11.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Z Cas,2461206.8397,11.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Z Cas 20260615.3397 11.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 11.68 23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6
114.89959 -5.21075 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 7" DH Cas
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.500 pg < 16.800 pg 2427942.00000 322.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 23 52 38.58 +56 44 28.6 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DH Cas,2461206.8397,11.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DH Cas 20260615.3397 11.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 11.71 00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2
117.39856 -9.21525 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 6.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 419247361391884544 | 00:14:47.12 +53:15:56.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 14 48.80 +53 15 45.2 11.7 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 419247361391884544,2461206.8397,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 419247361391884544 20260615.3397 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 11.86 00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7
117.12649 -7.36590 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 420605258247848704 | 00:11:10.38 +55:03:01.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 11 05.78 +55 03 01.7 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 420605258247848704,2461206.8397,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 420605258247848704 20260615.3397 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 11.87 00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2
116.97889 -8.71536 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J002.8858+53.6889 | 00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2: 15.34 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.30
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 11 33.33 +53 41 41.2 11.9 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J002.8858+53.6889,2461206.8397,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J002.8858+53.6889 20260615.3397 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.01 00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0
116.97254 -7.50218 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 420599004775516032 | 00:10:16.17 +54:53:28.2 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: F6 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 10 11.82 +54 53 30.0 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 420599004775516032,2461206.8397,12.01,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 420599004775516032 20260615.3397 12.01CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.04 00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2
115.71181 -8.77379 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J000.8196+53.4313 | 00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 03 18.90 +53 25 19.2 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J000.8196+53.4313,2461206.8397,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J000.8196+53.4313 20260615.3397 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.04 00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3
116.31235 -9.39657 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 07 57.10 +52 54 55.3 12.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.8397,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.3397 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.06 00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7
115.64862 -8.75147 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 6.9 pix
The object was found in VSX16" Gaia DR3 396250560296237568
Type: ROT
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.460 G 17.610 G 0.617510000000 M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7: 15.37 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 02 52.50 +53 25 55.7 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 396250560296237568,2461206.8397,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 396250560296237568 20260615.3397 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.05 00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1
115.98625 -9.72976 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.5" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 396074878952591232 | 00:06:11.52 +52:31:50.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 06 14.52 +52 31 53.1 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 396074878952591232,2461206.8397,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 396074878952591232 20260615.3397 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.06 23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7
115.27911 -8.30950 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 1945479104002298752 | 23:59:48.13 +53:47:20.9 (Gaia DR3) | ROT (local) | (local) | Gaia3var=VARIABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7: 15.51 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.33
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 23 59 52.63 +53 47 39.7 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1945479104002298752,2461206.8397,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1945479104002298752 20260615.3397 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.08 00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2
118.76904 -12.19352 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 25 50.10 +50 28 16.2 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.8397,12.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.3397 12.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.05 00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1
117.98933 -8.89159 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 18 23.99 +53 39 46.1 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.8397,12.05,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.3397 12.05CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.11 00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1
115.19946 -12.13614 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J001.0348+50.0226 | 00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 04 10.76 +50 01 29.1 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J001.0348+50.0226,2461206.8397,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J001.0348+50.0226 20260615.3397 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.12 00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4
118.75627 -7.72484 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J005.6690+54.9151 | 00:22:36.82 +54:55:13.4 (Gaia DR3) | SINE (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.16
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 22 35.64 +54 54 46.4 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J005.6690+54.9151,2461206.8397,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J005.6690+54.9151 20260615.3397 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.12 00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3
117.83459 -9.17535 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J004.3938+53.3634 | 00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 17 37.84 +53 21 41.3 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J004.3938+53.3634,2461206.8397,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J004.3938+53.3634 20260615.3397 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 12.12 23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2
115.05921 -8.73584 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX16" Gaia DR3 1945266593323395712
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.830 G 15.870 G A
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 23 59 01.44 +53 19 58.2 12.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1945266593323395712,2461206.8397,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1945266593323395712 20260615.3397 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 13.52 00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0
115.46218 -8.44350 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J000.3161+53.7093 | 00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 00 01 15.45 +53 41 56.0 13.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J000.3161+53.7093,2461206.8397,13.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J000.3161+53.7093 20260615.3397 13.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 13.62 23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6
114.61752 -7.80360 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.952+/-0.188 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6: 15.49 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.29
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 23 54 47.91 +54 09 04.6 13.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.8397,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.3397 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 14.07 23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8
113.96617 -6.73524 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.6" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 23 48 45.27 +55 02 29.8 14.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.8397,14.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.3397 14.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.3397 2461206.8397 14.08 23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9
114.85495 -8.02885 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 15.3398* 23 56 41.73 +53 58 55.9 14.1 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.8397,14.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.3397 14.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461206.84003900 15.06.2026 08:09:29.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 36
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 25462
Objects passed selection criteria: 25369
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 19893
Average stars matched: 18054.8 (90.7593 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 126740 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 15 03:12:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
First image: 2461082.59778519 11.02.2026 02:20:38.640 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Last image: 2461206.84003900 15.06.2026 08:09:29.370 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 483
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 154 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 203250
Objects passed selection criteria: 202618
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 159643
Average stars matched: 143430 (89.844 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1997156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Jun 15 03:47:18 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461206.83945590
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.466 +54:00:23.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.466 +54:00:23.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0264 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Image size: 927.1'x616.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.099 +54:01:02.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.099 +54:01:02.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0318 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.466 +54:00:23.28
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.099 +54:01:02.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01152 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xcdN8hr1us
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dTPzBU9Pug
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ilkidBGzVn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cw0uJCpKNN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.842700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.842700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec +47.7049 to +59.3705 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0002 to 359.9995 deg, Dec 47.7049 to 59.3705 deg
Loaded 162590 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14935 out of 16561 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16561 out of 29225 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 29065 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0009 to 359.9998 deg, Dec +47.6373 to +59.3623 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0009 to 359.9998 deg, Dec 47.6373 to 59.3623 deg
Loaded 163448 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14807 out of 16429 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16429 out of 29065 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 33 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
15.1 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xcdN8hr1us (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3209, passed=29225
Got 29225 stars (including 25982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4494 through 0 to 15.3164, gap 15.3164 to 345.4494
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27679 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4490 through 0 to 15.3182, gap 15.3182 to 345.4490
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27676 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27675 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.471 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=194 n_q2=269 n_q3=218 n_q4=295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.147
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dTPzBU9Pug (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3195, passed=29065
Got 29065 stars (including 25829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4479 through 0 to 15.3165, gap 15.3165 to 345.4479
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 946 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4484 through 0 to 15.3183, gap 15.3183 to 345.4484
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.695 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.452 n_q1=196 n_q2=274 n_q3=213 n_q4=293 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ilkidBGzVn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1910, passed=23386
Got 23386 stars (including 21456 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9996 through 0 to 14.8812, gap 14.8812 to 344.9996
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 344 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 246 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.81"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0043 through 0 to 14.8906, gap 14.8906 to 345.0043
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 390 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 307 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.91"
Excluding outliers - 307 stars left (next iteration limit 257)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=307 sigma_overall_arcsec=9.217 sigma_q1_arcsec=25.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=25.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.078 n_q1=30 n_q2=26 n_q3=80 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.772
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cw0uJCpKNN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1872, passed=23366
Got 23366 stars (including 21472 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23366 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012876 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010301 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0112 through 0 to 14.8810, gap 14.8810 to 345.0112
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 347 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 237 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 224 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.88"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0153 through 0 to 14.8918, gap 14.8918 to 345.0153
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 388 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.84"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 307 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.15"
Excluding outliers - 307 stars left (next iteration limit 246)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=307 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.823 sigma_q1_arcsec=28.946 sigma_q2_arcsec=29.972 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.517 n_q1=28 n_q2=28 n_q3=88 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.535
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits sigma_overall=0.504 worst_q_ratio=1.147
ref2=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits sigma_overall=0.538 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits sigma_overall=9.217 worst_q_ratio=2.772
new2=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits sigma_overall=11.823 worst_q_ratio=2.535
reference average sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.2195
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 1st new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) flagged: sigma=9.217 (ref avg 0.521), ratio=2.772 (ref avg 1.2195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 22448 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1564145.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1564145.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 24.1148 (2.97126e+10), 7 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (0.00337162,54.0048), pixel scale 5.93335 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+-----+--+--+-+-----+(best)-------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1564145.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1564145.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.004740, 54.005635) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:01.137, +54:00:20.285).
Field size: 15.6105 x 10.4366 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.23117 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 15 03:22 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 15 03:22 out1564145.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1564145.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1564145.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.45 degrees of RA,Dec (0.00610833,54.0065)
log-odds ratio 24.1148 (2.97126e+10), 7 match, 0 conflict, 18 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (0.00337162,54.0048), pixel scale 5.93335 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+--+-----+--+--+-+-----+(best)-------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1564145.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1564145.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (0.004740, 54.005635) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (00:00:01.137, +54:00:20.285).
Field size: 15.6105 x 10.4366 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.23117 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 15 03:22 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 15 03:22 out1564145.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1704, 946.962] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1704, 946.962] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 21-30).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.466 +54:00:23.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 23386 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2552334.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1910, passed=23386
Got 23386 stars (including 21456 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9996 through 0 to 14.8812, gap 14.8812 to 344.9996
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 344 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 246 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 175 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 234 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5508 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.81"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0043 through 0 to 14.8906, gap 14.8906 to 345.0043
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 390 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 310 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.73"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 307 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7002 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.91"
Excluding outliers - 307 stars left (next iteration limit 257)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=307 sigma_overall_arcsec=9.217 sigma_q1_arcsec=25.548 sigma_q2_arcsec=25.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.370 sigma_q4_arcsec=8.078 n_q1=30 n_q2=26 n_q3=80 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.772
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 1st new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits): sigma 9.217->9.217, ratio 2.772->2.772; reverting to order 3
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: 2nd new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits) flagged: sigma=11.823 (ref avg 0.521), ratio=2.535 (ref avg 1.2195), threshold=2.0x. Retrying with --tweak-order 2.
Running with VAST_TWEAK_ORDER=2: util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 22370 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2553076.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2553076.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 24.78 (5.77858e+10), 8 match, 0 conflict, 21 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (359.998,54.0158), pixel scale 5.93335 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++---+----+--+---+---+---+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2553076.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2553076.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.999043, 54.016659) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:59.770, +54:00:59.973).
Field size: 15.6106 x 10.4368 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.24101 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 15 03:33 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 15 03:33 out2553076.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out2553076.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out2553076.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.4517 degrees of RA,Dec (0.0004125,54.0175)
log-odds ratio 24.78 (5.77858e+10), 8 match, 0 conflict, 21 distractors, 24 index.
RA,Dec = (359.998,54.0158), pixel scale 5.93335 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---++---+----+--+---+---+---+(best)-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out2553076.solved to indicate this.
Field: out2553076.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (359.999043, 54.016659) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (23:59:59.770, +54:00:59.973).
Field size: 15.6106 x 10.4368 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.24101 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Jun 15 03:33 fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 8.5K Jun 15 03:33 out2553076.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 100000 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1704, 946.963] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3.59974
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 4.07581
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 2.75958
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.52517
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.1704, 946.963] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 39 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 40 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 41 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 42 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 43 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 3.59974
Verifying WCS with index 44 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 4.07581
Verifying WCS with index 45 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 2.75958
Verifying WCS with index 46 of 61 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 1.52517
Got 0 solutions.
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4110.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4109.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4108.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4107.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-11.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-10.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-09.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-08.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-07.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-06.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-05.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-04.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-03.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-02.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-01.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-204-00.fits, field objects 11-20).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-5005-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4206-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-11.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-10.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-09.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-08.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-07.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-06.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-05.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-04.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-03.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-02.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-01.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4205-00.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4113.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4112.fits, field objects 21-30).
Total CPU time limit reached!
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4111.fits, field objects 21-30).
Field: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Did not solve (or no WCS file was written).
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat from image00004.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Image size: 927.1'x616.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.099 +54:01:02.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 23366 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2719104.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1872, passed=23366
Got 23366 stars (including 21472 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23366 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012876 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010301 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0112 through 0 to 14.8810, gap 14.8810 to 345.0112
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 347 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 237 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 224 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5074 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.88"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.0153 through 0 to 14.8918, gap 14.8918 to 345.0153
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 691 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 388 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5108 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.84"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 307 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6798 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 7.15"
Excluding outliers - 307 stars left (next iteration limit 246)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=307 sigma_overall_arcsec=11.823 sigma_q1_arcsec=28.946 sigma_q2_arcsec=29.972 sigma_q3_arcsec=5.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=10.517 n_q1=28 n_q2=28 n_q3=88 n_q4=163 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.535
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
WCS_QUALITY_RETRY: --tweak-order 2 did NOT improve 2nd new image (fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits): sigma 11.823->11.823, ratio 2.535->2.535; reverting to order 3
WARNING: 1st new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=9.217 -- 17.69x the reference average (0.521); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has sigma_overall_arcsec=11.823 -- 22.69x the reference average (0.521); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 1st new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.772 -- 2.27x the reference average (1.2195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
WARNING: 2nd new image has worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.535 -- 2.08x the reference average (1.2195); plate solution may be of low accuracy
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (976 matched stars from wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006_astrometric_residuals.png (307 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 5.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007_astrometric_residuals.png (307 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 5.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9: 15.06 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8: 15.64 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9: 14.78 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=12.0864 delta=2.80 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.6733 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.5015 delta=1.79 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7110 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7: 14.33 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.48 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7: ref_mag=14.48 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=11.8551 delta=2.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2: 15.34 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.34 +/- 0.30
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0088 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2: ref_mag=15.34 +/- 0.30 new_mean_mag=11.8700 delta=3.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2: 14.63 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2: 14.67 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.0392 delta=2.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7: 15.37 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7: 15.30 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.33 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7: ref_mag=15.33 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=12.0650 delta=3.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:51:08.82 +51:24:10.5: 10.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:51:08.82 +51:24:10.5: 10.73 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.71 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:08.82 +51:24:10.5: ref_mag=10.71 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0719 delta=-1.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:55:30.92 +57:27:07.2: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:55:30.92 +57:27:07.2: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:30.92 +57:27:07.2: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1103 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1: 14.25 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1: 14.35 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.0501 delta=2.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7: 15.51 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.51 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7: ref_mag=15.51 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=12.0620 delta=3.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1: 15.68 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4: 15.03 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4: 15.20 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.10 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=12.1234 delta=2.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2: 15.56 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out33900.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34206.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34931.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35350.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35890.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36111.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36130.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36156.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36212.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36227.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36231.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36270.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36374.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36404.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out36417.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 34s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 13s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31472_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 31472_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31476_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 31476_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 32347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:50.04 +53:44:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32889_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 32889_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:02.31 +55:11:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33086_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 33086_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:40.99 +55:32:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33900_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 33900_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34206_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 34206_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34362_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 34362_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:50:45.28 +53:34:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34765_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 34765_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34931_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 34931_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 35350_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35354_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 35354_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35443_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 35443_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35863_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 35863_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 35890_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35975_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 35975_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36085_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 36085_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36111_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36111_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36130_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36130_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36156_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36156_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36167_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 36167_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 36185_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36212_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36212_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36227_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36227_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36231_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36231_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36270_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36270_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36284_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36284_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36404_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36404_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 36417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 21888_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:24.65 +51:26:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 09534_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 08367_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:23:07.07 +55:47:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 48s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9
00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8
23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6
23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6
00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2
00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7
00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2
00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0
00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2
00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3
00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7
00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1
23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7
00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2
00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1
00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1
00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4
00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3
23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Image size: 927.0'x616.4' 15.4(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.466 +54:00:23.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.466 +54:00:23.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0264 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Image size: 927.1'x616.5' 15.5(deg)x10.3(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.79"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.099 +54:01:02.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:52.581 +53:59:29.78
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.099 +54:01:02.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0318 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:01.466 +54:00:23.28
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.099 +54:01:02.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01152 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0wZ6gcYfdV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4wcoBO7Kbh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JYZfFeytTC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KsRQPu3urO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits and wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.676500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.676500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 217609 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6392 to +59.3793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6392 to 59.3793 deg
Loaded 163629 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11705 out of 17839 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17839 out of 217609 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 217552 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +47.6349 to +59.3691 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 47.6349 to 59.3691 deg
Loaded 163556 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11613 out of 17712 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 17712 out of 217552 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 434 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
1.9 pix Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
15.3 mag. Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0wZ6gcYfdV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=32857, passed=217571
Got 217571 stars (including 184418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4355 through 0 to 15.4567, gap 15.4567 to 345.4355
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 963 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4349 through 0 to 15.4584, gap 15.4584 to 345.4349
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 976 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 211761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=976 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.455 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.430 n_q1=213 n_q2=264 n_q3=237 n_q4=262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4wcoBO7Kbh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=32499, passed=217519
Got 217519 stars (including 184678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 217519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4449 through 0 to 15.4097, gap 15.4097 to 345.4449
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 345.4450 through 0 to 15.4115, gap 15.4115 to 345.4450
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 212423 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.559 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=220 n_q2=266 n_q3=235 n_q4=257 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.JYZfFeytTC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=35, blended=20826, passed=167247
Got 167247 stars (including 146261 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167247 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012875 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010300 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9631 through 0 to 14.9764, gap 14.9764 to 344.9631
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 318 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 223 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 9.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 211 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34617 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.83"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9682 through 0 to 14.9889, gap 14.9889 to 344.9682
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 362 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 295 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34642 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.82"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 294 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51500 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.12"
Excluding outliers - 294 stars left (next iteration limit 232)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits N_match=294 sigma_overall_arcsec=12.212 sigma_q1_arcsec=29.153 sigma_q2_arcsec=27.936 sigma_q3_arcsec=9.595 sigma_q4_arcsec=9.562 n_q1=36 n_q2=25 n_q3=79 n_q4=154 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KsRQPu3urO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=20515, passed=165665
Got 165665 stars (including 144981 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 165665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 927.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 927.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012876 (46.4 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010301 (37.1 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9474 through 0 to 14.9341, gap 14.9341 to 344.9474
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 327 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 230 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.94"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 219 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.91"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 344.9593 through 0 to 14.9543, gap 14.9543 to 344.9593
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.2 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 382 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 312 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 34859 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.90"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 308 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.61"
Excluding outliers - 308 stars left (next iteration limit 240)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits N_match=308 sigma_overall_arcsec=12.164 sigma_q1_arcsec=29.589 sigma_q2_arcsec=28.635 sigma_q3_arcsec=9.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=11.143 n_q1=35 n_q2=22 n_q3=91 n_q4=160 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=2.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-08-38_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-15_CI_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_031007_TTUQ2b1x1_1315032_2AXAnVOW/wcs_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6: 15.49 +/- 0.29 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.49 +/- 0.29
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6: ref_mag=15.49 +/- 0.29 new_mean_mag=13.6192 delta=1.87 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:56:39.75 +53:42:40.8: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-20-38_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0006.fits at 23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9: 15.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:56:39.75 +53:42:40.8: 14.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.92 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:39.75 +53:42:40.8: ref_mag=14.92 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.0740 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-10_20-21-47_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0007.fits at 23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out244035.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out262877.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out271937.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out272588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243729_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243729_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243742_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243742_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243744_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243744_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243746_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243746_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243753_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243753_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243754_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243754_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243758_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243758_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243759_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243759_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243763_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243763_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243782_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243782_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243786_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243786_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243788_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243788_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243790_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243790_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243813_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243813_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243817_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243817_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243826_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243826_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243834_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243834_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243837_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243837_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243841_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243848_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243854_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243854_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243873_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243873_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243880_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243896_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243896_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243898_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243898_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243899_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243899_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243905_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243906_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243906_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243909_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243909_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243911_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243911_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243915_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243915_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243916_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243916_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243923_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243923_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243925_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243925_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243929_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243933_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243933_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243939_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243942_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243942_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243945_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243945_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243947_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243947_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243948_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243955_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243955_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243957_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243957_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243959_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243959_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243960_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243960_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243966_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243966_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243967_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243967_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243970_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243970_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243972_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243972_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243973_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243973_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243977_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243977_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243984_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243984_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243987_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243987_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243990_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243990_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243992_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243992_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243999_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 243999_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244004_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244004_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244007_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244007_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (46.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244008_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244008_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244011_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244011_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244012_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244012_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244013_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244013_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244017_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244017_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244023_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244023_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244024_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244024_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244033_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244033_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244035_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 244035_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244037_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244037_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244039_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244039_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244042_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244042_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244043_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244043_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244046_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244046_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244048_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244048_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244049_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244049_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244051_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244051_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244057_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244057_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244059_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244059_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244066_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244066_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244067_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244067_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244070_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244070_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244072_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244072_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244073_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244073_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244074_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244074_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244075_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244075_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244076_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244076_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244079_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244079_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244080_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244080_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244081_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244081_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244083_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244083_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244084_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244084_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244087_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244087_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244089_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244089_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244091_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244092_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244092_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244093_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244098_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244098_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244099_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244099_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 244103_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 244103_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 245577_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 245577_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:02.92 +55:11:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 246125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 246125_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247189_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 247189_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 247877_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 247877_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248264_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 248264_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248434_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 248434_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249527_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 249527_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 250384_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 250384_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251400_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 251400_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 251861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 251861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252168_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 252168_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 252347_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252521_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 252521_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252557_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 252557_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 252958_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 252958_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 253417_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253526_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 253526_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 253966_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 253966_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 254261_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 254261_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 255022_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 255022_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256271_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 256271_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256453_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 256453_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 256954_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 256954_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257611_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 257611_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 257636_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 257636_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258009_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 258009_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 258140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258381_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 258381_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258530_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 258530_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 258531_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 258531_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259007_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259007_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259460_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259460_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259525_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259525_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259767_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259767_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259806_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259806_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259938_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259963_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259963_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 259965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 259965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 260015_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260051_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 260051_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260054_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 260054_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260082_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 260082_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260267_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 260267_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260521_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 260521_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 260864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 260864_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 261026_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (40.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261033_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 261033_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261074_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 261074_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261303_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 261303_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261348_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 261348_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 261442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261488_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 261488_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262038_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 262038_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262155_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 262155_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262599_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 262599_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262647_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 262647_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262751_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 262751_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262760_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 262760_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262808_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 262808_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262877_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 262877_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 262958_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 262958_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263178_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263178_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263279_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263279_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263305_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263305_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263444_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263444_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263527_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263527_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263543_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263543_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263625_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263625_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263832_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263832_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263892_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263892_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 263926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 263926_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264129_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264129_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264182_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264182_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264186_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264186_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264235_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264235_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264295_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264295_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264372_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264372_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264392_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264392_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264439_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264439_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264532_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264532_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264927_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264927_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 264942_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 264942_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265022_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265022_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265059_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265059_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265138_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265138_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265154_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265154_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265471_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265471_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265605_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265605_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265646_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265646_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265686_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265686_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265706_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265706_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265886_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 265910_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 265910_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266005_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266018_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266018_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266028_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266028_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266034_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266034_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266141_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266141_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266446_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266446_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266509_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266509_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266514_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266514_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266567_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266567_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266877_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266877_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266999_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 266999_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267134_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267134_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267165_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267165_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267205_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267205_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267237_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267237_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267267_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267267_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267582_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267582_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267648_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267648_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267659_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267659_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267720_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267720_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267762_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267762_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267768_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267768_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267809_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267811_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267811_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267879_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267879_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 267884_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268056_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268056_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268100_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268188_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268188_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (37.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268484_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268484_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268613_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268613_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268653_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268653_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268716_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268716_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268822_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268822_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 268935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 268935_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269018_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269018_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269036_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269036_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269159_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269159_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269292_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269292_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269498_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269498_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269519_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269519_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269582_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269582_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269608_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269608_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269666_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269666_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269747_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269747_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269752_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269788_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269788_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269919_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269919_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 269945_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 269945_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270064_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270064_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270160_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270160_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270240_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270240_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270316_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270316_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270483_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270483_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270561_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270561_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270570_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270570_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270825_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270825_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 270885_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 270885_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271203_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271203_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271327_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271327_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271474_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271474_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271506_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271506_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271556_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271556_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271567_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271567_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271622_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271622_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271623_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271623_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 271814_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 271937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 271937_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272069_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272069_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272134_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272134_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272287_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272287_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272288_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272288_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272489_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272489_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272580_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272580_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272588_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
Preparing report for the candidate 272588_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272749_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272764_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272764_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272903_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272903_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 272965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 272965_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 273102_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273201_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 273201_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 273374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273462_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 273462_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273773_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 273773_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 273940_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 273940_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274000_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 274000_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274007_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 274007_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274014_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 274014_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274177_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 274177_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274335_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 274335_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274380_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 274380_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274519_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 274519_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 274876_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 274876_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275016_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 275016_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275181_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 275181_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275414_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 275414_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275922_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 275922_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275944_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 275944_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 275967_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 275967_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276080_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 276080_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 276140_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276415_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 276415_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276678_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 276678_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 276700_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 276700_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 277221_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277742_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 277742_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 277857_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 277857_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278151_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 278151_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278279_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 278279_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 278340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278503_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 278503_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278642_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 278642_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278783_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 278783_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 278977_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 278977_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279034_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 279034_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279324_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 279324_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 279374_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279722_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 279722_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279823_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 279823_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 279847_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279862_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 279862_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 279875_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 279875_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280001_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 280001_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 280137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280310_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 280310_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 280563_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 280563_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281194_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281194_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281282_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281282_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281319_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281319_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281340_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281455_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281605_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281605_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281666_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281666_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281738_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281738_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281739_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281739_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281845_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281845_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281887_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281887_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 281893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 281893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282036_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282036_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282109_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282109_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282174_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282214_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282214_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282282_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282282_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282293_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282293_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282440_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282440_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282466_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282466_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (33.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282468_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282468_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282499_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282499_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282505_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282505_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282509_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282509_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282512_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282512_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282633_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282633_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282742_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282742_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282774_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282774_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282842_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282842_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282861_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282893_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 282983_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 282983_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283086_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283086_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283118_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283186_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283186_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283207_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283207_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283273_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283273_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (36.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283360_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283360_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283392_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283392_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283433_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283433_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283458_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283458_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283463_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283463_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283475_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283475_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283533_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283537_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283537_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283578_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283578_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283651_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283651_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (50.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283699_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283699_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283718_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283718_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283732_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283732_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283767_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283767_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283784_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283784_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283851_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283910_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283910_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (49.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 283925_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 283925_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284025_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284025_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284030_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284124_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284124_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284196_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284196_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (42.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284219_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284219_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284255_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284255_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284275_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284275_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284289_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284394_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284394_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284396_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284396_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284412_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284412_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284463_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284463_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284467_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284467_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284622_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284622_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284623_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284623_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284643_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284643_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284664_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284664_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284761_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284761_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284763_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284763_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284766_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284806_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284806_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284838_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284838_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284852_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284902_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284902_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 284914_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 284914_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 285027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 285027_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 285044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 285044_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 285077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 285077_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 285253_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 285253_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 285256_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 285256_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 285442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 285442_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 174810_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:23.91 +51:26:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 130430_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 79234_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:41.01 +55:32:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 58579_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 179137_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 160198_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71796_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 71796_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 53473_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 125040_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:48.93 +53:44:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143637_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 143637_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69970_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007
The candidate 69970_fd_Cas-04-Q2b1x1_2026-06-15_03-09-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0007 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 26s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9
00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8
23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6
23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6
00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2
00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7
00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2
00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0
00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2
00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3
00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7
00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1
23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7
00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2
00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1
00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1
00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4
00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3
23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2
00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0
23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6
23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8
23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9
########### Completed Cas-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9
00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8
23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6
23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6
00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2
00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7
00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2
00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0
00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2
00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3
00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7
00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1
23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7
00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2
00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1
00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1
00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4
00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3
23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2
00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0
23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6
23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8
23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9
###################################################################################
23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0 -- not a known variable star
00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7 -- a known variable star
00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2 -- not a known variable star
00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1 -- not a known variable star
00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1 -- not a known variable star
00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3 -- not a known variable star
00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0 -- not a known variable star
00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7 -- not a known variable star
00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2 -- not a known variable star
00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2 -- not a known variable star
00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3 -- not a known variable star
00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1 -- not a known variable star
00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8 -- not a known variable star
00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4 -- not a known variable star
00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2 -- not a known variable star
23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9 -- not a known variable star
23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6 -- a known variable star
23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8 -- not a known variable star
23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6 -- a known variable star
23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6 -- not a known variable star
23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9 -- not a known variable star
23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2 -- a known variable star
23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7 -- not a known variable star
Found 19 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
23 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
00:01:15.45 +53:41:56.0
00:02:52.50 +53:25:55.7
00:03:18.90 +53:25:19.2
00:04:10.76 +50:01:29.1
00:06:14.52 +52:31:53.1
00:07:57.10 +52:54:55.3
00:10:11.82 +54:53:30.0
00:11:05.78 +55:03:01.7
00:11:33.33 +53:41:41.2
00:14:48.80 +53:15:45.2
00:17:37.84 +53:21:41.3
00:18:23.99 +53:39:46.1
00:20:40.55 +50:11:55.8
00:22:35.64 +54:54:46.4
00:25:50.10 +50:28:16.2
23:40:13.33 +55:25:36.9
23:44:32.52 +56:34:44.6
23:48:45.27 +55:02:29.8
23:52:38.58 +56:44:28.6
23:54:47.91 +54:09:04.6
23:56:41.73 +53:58:55.9
23:59:01.44 +53:19:58.2
23:59:52.63 +53:47:39.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461206.83945590 -observatory V36
07:20:14.84 +23:15:07.2 Mercury (0.5mag)
08:18:15.82 +21:43:48.3 Venus (-4.0mag)
03:10:26.65 +17:15:21.5 Mars (1.3mag)
07:54:28.80 +21:15:51.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:51:17.33 +02:58:56.3 Saturn (0.8mag)
04:01:53.19 +20:30:15.4 Uranus (5.8mag)
00:16:30.83 +00:18:48.9 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:32:55.40 -23:07:19.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
05:47:31.43 +27:05:47.1 Moon (99.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 15 03:12 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461206.83945590:
07:54:31.48 +21:15:45.3 Io (6.2mag)
07:54:29.80 +21:15:50.5 Europa (6.3mag)
07:54:13.28 +21:16:40.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
07:54:04.14 +21:17:11.1 Callisto (6.9mag)
07:54:20.60 +20:52:55.7 Himalia (15.6mag)
07:54:26.97 +21:15:58.7 Thebe (16.5mag)
07:54:08.17 +21:05:19.7 Elara (17.6mag)
07:57:00.90 +21:23:39.0 Pasiphae (17.8mag)
08:00:44.48 +21:18:08.4 Carme (18.9mag)
00:51:29.23 +02:58:55.9 Titan (8.6mag)
00:51:22.62 +02:58:51.7 Rhea (9.9mag)
00:51:41.49 +03:01:29.0 Iapetus (11.3mag)
00:51:32.74 +02:58:46.8 Hyperion (14.6mag)
00:51:50.70 +02:59:50.6 Phoebe (16.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 15 03:12 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461206.83945590:
17:27:33.49 -35:37:24.7 JWST
19:09:47.52 +11:42:07.5 Chandra
09:22:26.63 -53:24:08.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 15 03:12 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461206.83945590 -observatory V36
18:38:17.05 -33:09:08.1 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
06:00:33.22 -68:00:32.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:51:42.17 +32:03:49.9 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
17:11:52.76 +15:39:52.2 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
22:22:14.20 -43:38:00.5 16.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
23:10:46.25 +31:50:44.0 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
05:42:46.44 +27:00:20.2 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
09:35:00.87 +30:49:21.6 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:54:29.21 +04:15:01.0 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
18:23:30.65 +21:41:39.7 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS)
15:16:57.52 -11:02:03.9 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
22:11:21.36 +66:56:14.5 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
17:28:36.09 -07:24:36.1 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
13:16:37.00 +81:20:07.4 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
07:20:37.33 +64:33:51.9 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
06:57:57.89 +28:25:57.7 13.9mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:31:50.70 +14:06:02.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
20:07:46.98 +33:13:19.3 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
04:25:11.02 -15:21:20.9 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
06:12:32.37 +33:15:39.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:32:32.56 +52:19:11.7 17.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
06:53:00.58 -11:12:27.7 14.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
09:30:17.84 +23:13:19.0 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
12:39:48.05 +04:38:04.5 17.1mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
17:59:45.78 +76:33:18.2 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
02:12:37.50 +43:54:00.7 16.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:13:12.28 -01:23:01.1 16.6mag A/2026 E1
20:36:31.44 -09:14:54.1 8.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:03:52.94 -01:05:33.4 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
03:22:44.65 +26:35:00.2 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson
09:15:13.13 +21:41:50.8 16.9mag 63P/Wild
00:32:48.22 -05:56:35.4 15.6mag 65P/Gunn
07:06:39.80 +34:01:34.0 17.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura
03:26:30.40 +18:04:40.4 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels
01:35:54.59 +06:20:45.5 15.7mag 88P/Howell
05:17:37.09 +30:43:53.4 15.3mag 93P/Lovas
03:03:31.87 +28:42:21.8 17.4mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
07:07:41.83 +32:43:25.9 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley
10:02:42.74 +11:35:29.5 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos
04:10:49.93 +19:42:03.5 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
04:47:44.60 +19:22:17.5 17.8mag 131P/Mueller
06:27:55.79 +17:43:28.5 15.6mag 141P/Machholz
06:31:02.47 +17:53:40.1 15.5mag 141P-A/Machholz
05:29:18.55 +16:57:45.9 12.4mag 141P-D/Machholz
03:02:36.40 -23:44:59.1 16.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
04:05:21.30 +26:33:22.3 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring
19:35:04.00 +03:57:59.3 16.5mag 169P/NEAT
00:37:27.14 +03:49:15.3 17.8mag 220P/McNaught
16:46:57.69 -08:12:03.7 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR
07:50:44.56 +35:08:56.5 17.6mag 240P/NEAT
00:51:12.63 +00:37:19.8 16.2mag 260P/McNaught
04:23:56.72 +33:43:01.2 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR
00:32:35.43 -01:25:45.0 17.8mag 320P/McNaught
15:12:15.71 +07:48:16.2 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski
08:12:56.14 +20:33:03.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
07:11:37.25 +41:10:44.5 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 15 03:12 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15
14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63
13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43
11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59
22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36
21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15
14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42
15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06
16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99
10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28
15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65
07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89
11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38
10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85
14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12
10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 2026-06-11 17.05
13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78
13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65
13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31
06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16
23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9
12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03
21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18
08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01
14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03
17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15
15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 2026-06-11 17.05
12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65
17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03
09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49
16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5
04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37
22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21
19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06
19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98
16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64
09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34
05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49
07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7
21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7
04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81
05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07
09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58
07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11
05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51
19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98
19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88
18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38
16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81
21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47
11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48
11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27
07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14
09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82
07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82
05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02
11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56
19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3
20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 15 03:12 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag
19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag
16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag
00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag
15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag
00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag
00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag
21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag
15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag
07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag
16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag
00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag
09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag
00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag
00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag
12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag
00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag
00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag
00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag
19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 15 03:12 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
14:07:39.930 -39:18:42.71 AT 2026omf 2026-06-07.41 19.73
13:49:19.289 -10:17:13.45 AT 2026ome 2026-06-06.42 19.9
15:05:48.011 -29:45:37.21 AT 2026omd 2026-06-06.50 20.04
20:30:10.926 -29:56:07.53 AT 2026omc 2026-06-07.64 18.81
19:50:57.124 -53:24:23.12 AT 2026omb 2026-06-06.67 20.17
23:28:37.442 -43:16:54.75 AT 2026oma 2026-06-06.73 19.64
11:48:30.394 -39:49:36.11 AT 2026olz 2026-06-06.77 19.237
13:56:31.281 +70:50:34.89 AT 2026oly 2026-06-06.35 19.395
12:22:49.169 -21:19:33.91 AT 2026olx 2026-06-07.30 18.696
22:49:46.803 -26:24:12.60 SN 2026olw 2026-06-07.58 18.251
10:47:10.687 -70:44:55.20 AT 2026olv 2026-06-06.81 18.37
11:06:55.086 +37:19:50.72 AT 2026olu 2026-06-01.30 18.692
14:54:40.331 -10:41:24.18 SN 2026olt 2026-06-04.43 18.588
10:58:43.462 +36:47:26.62 AT 2026ols 2026-06-04.90 18.501
08:45:48.069 -64:46:34.13 AT 2026olr 2026-06-06.71 18.616
10:02:19.987 -84:42:35.43 AT 2026olq 2026-06-06.80 18.714
22:35:38.444 -55:59:06.00 SN 2026olp 2026-05-30.09 18.424
21:02:06.402 +85:28:22.07 AT 2026olo 2026-06-07.10 18.987
18:52:00.191 +72:19:28.04 AT 2026oln 2026-06-07.07 18.528
23:35:46.181 -42:09:54.16 AT 2026olm 2026-06-07.13 18.697
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 15 03:12 tns_transients_list.txt
