This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1325 2461206.6325 12.70 07:00:06.81 +62:17:24.0
153.71857 24.79356 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 1.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:00:06.81 +62:17:24.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.347+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:00:06.81 +62:17:24.0: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:00:06.81 +62:17:24.0: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6325,12.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1325 12.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1325 2461206.6325 12.83 07:02:14.93 +63:54:29.5
152.01563 25.33893 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:02:14.93 +63:54:29.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.926+/-0.028 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:02:14.93 +63:54:29.5: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:02:14.93 +63:54:29.5: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6325,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1325 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1325 2461206.6325 12.62 07:06:53.11 +61:41:18.0
154.53847 25.45915 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:06:53.11 +61:41:18.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.392+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:06:53.11 +61:41:18.0: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:06:53.11 +61:41:18.0: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6325,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1325 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1325 2461206.6325 12.66 07:02:10.36 +61:09:55.8
154.98602 24.80596 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J070210.42+610956.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.490 V 13.840 V 2456991.90000 64.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:02:10.36 +61:09:55.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:02:10.36 +61:09:55.8: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J070210.42+610956.2,2461206.6325,12.66,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J070210.42+610956.2 20260615.1325 12.66CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1325 2461206.6325 12.86 07:02:43.21 +62:40:56.9
153.35846 25.16518 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:02:43.21 +62:40:56.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.314+/-0.032 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:02:43.21 +62:40:56.9: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:02:43.21 +62:40:56.9: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6325,12.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1325 12.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1325 2461206.6325 12.88 07:21:15.22 +61:41:26.1
154.83044 27.14227 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:21:15.22 +61:41:26.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:21:15.22 +61:41:26.1: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:21:15.22 +61:41:26.1: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6325,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1325 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1325 2461206.6325 12.60 06:59:26.54 +61:10:48.4
154.89539 24.48698 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:59:26.54 +61:10:48.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.349+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:59:26.54 +61:10:48.4: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:59:26.54 +61:10:48.4: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6325,12.60,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1325 12.60CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
First image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Last image: 2461206.63268918 15.06.2026 03:10:54.345 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9980
Objects passed selection criteria: 9914
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6042
Average stars matched: 5885 (97.4015 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116768 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 23:12:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
First image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Last image: 2461206.63268918 15.06.2026 03:10:54.345 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 47
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 12 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 67553
Objects passed selection criteria: 67346
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 44269.8
Average stars matched: 42512.8 (96.0311 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 173296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 23:13:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461206.63226506
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.098 +61:59:59.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:27.098 +61:59:59.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0020 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Image size: 938.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:26.737 +62:00:08.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:26.737 +62:00:08.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:27.098 +61:59:59.81
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:26.737 +62:00:08.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00256 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KgtuKGLvYX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7AuHwGRPEO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sS2LMmvfOi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d925OoICDQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7789 out of 8335 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8335 out of 14996 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.880200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.880200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7789 out of 8335 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8335 out of 14996 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8216 deg, Dec +55.3699 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8216 deg, Dec 55.3699 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7742 out of 8307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8307 out of 14938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.2 pix Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KgtuKGLvYX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1166, passed=14996
Got 14996 stars (including 13804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=202 n_q2=259 n_q3=219 n_q4=291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7AuHwGRPEO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1174, passed=14938
Got 14938 stars (including 13741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14938 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=200 n_q2=258 n_q3=216 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sS2LMmvfOi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=101, passed=1928
Got 1928 stars (including 1827 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1852 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.700 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.560 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.545 n_q1=215 n_q2=283 n_q3=261 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.285
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d925OoICDQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=90, passed=1944
Got 1944 stars (including 1854 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 953 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=953 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.486 n_q1=231 n_q2=292 n_q3=246 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.217
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.319
ref2=Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.197
new1=fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits sigma_overall=0.544 worst_q_ratio=1.285
new2=fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.484 worst_q_ratio=1.217
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.258
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (953 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20603_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 20603_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:33.80 +60:56:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10092_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 10092_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:46.57 +59:52:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.098 +61:59:59.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:27.098 +61:59:59.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0020 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 938.0'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:26.737 +62:00:08.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:26.737 +62:00:08.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0044 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:27.098 +61:59:59.81
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:26.737 +62:00:08.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00256 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KjlNos2zll
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f2OzCmDYv5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eGVnPrK4La
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OBdiWAeQx1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95446 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4161 deg
Loaded 13021 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6966 out of 8475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8475 out of 95446 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.744950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.744950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.55
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95446 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4161 deg
Loaded 13021 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6966 out of 8475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8475 out of 95446 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 96840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8832 deg, Dec +55.3696 to +67.4163 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8832 deg, Dec 55.3696 to 67.4163 deg
Loaded 13020 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6924 out of 8478 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8478 out of 96840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 36 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.0 pix Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
15.6 mag. Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KjlNos2zll (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=7057, passed=95427
Got 95427 stars (including 88215 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93858 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=207 n_q2=248 n_q3=226 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f2OzCmDYv5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=7337, passed=96824
Got 96824 stars (including 89314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 96824 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95378 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95380 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=205 n_q2=252 n_q3=226 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eGVnPrK4La (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=483, passed=17984
Got 17984 stars (including 17481 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17984 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17434 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.530 n_q1=216 n_q2=278 n_q3=260 n_q4=200 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OBdiWAeQx1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=416, passed=17774
Got 17774 stars (including 17342 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17774 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 938.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 938.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013028 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010422 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 952 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17037 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17038 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17040 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=951 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.461 n_q1=230 n_q2=284 n_q3=252 n_q4=185 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.174
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-17_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0022.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_230905_TTUQ2b1x1_1328301_SB6uSbTg/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:47:39.88 +66:14:55.3: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:06:22.69 +62:51:55.8: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:19:12.19 +59:08:35.1: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:47:39.88 +66:14:55.3: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.94 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:39.88 +66:14:55.3: ref_mag=11.94 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8515 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:06:22.69 +62:51:55.8: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:22.69 +62:51:55.8: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4038 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:19:12.19 +59:08:35.1: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:12.19 +59:08:35.1: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2751 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:00:06.81 +62:17:24.0: 13.60 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:02:14.93 +63:54:29.5: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:06:53.11 +61:41:18.0: 13.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:07:01.80 +61:28:09.9: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:02:10.36 +61:09:55.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:00:06.81 +62:17:24.0: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:00:06.81 +62:17:24.0: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6770 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:06:53.11 +61:41:18.0: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:02:14.93 +63:54:29.5: 13.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:06:53.11 +61:41:18.0: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6164 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:07:01.80 +61:28:09.9: 13.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:14.93 +63:54:29.5: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8003 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:01.80 +61:28:09.9: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5007 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:02:10.36 +61:09:55.8: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:10.36 +61:09:55.8: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6593 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:02:43.21 +62:40:56.9: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:21:15.22 +61:41:26.1: 14.05 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:59:26.54 +61:10:48.4: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:02:43.21 +62:40:56.9: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:02:43.21 +62:40:56.9: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8414 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:21:15.22 +61:41:26.1: 14.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:21:15.22 +61:41:26.1: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.8579 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:59:26.54 +61:10:48.4: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:59:26.54 +61:10:48.4: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5977 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38010.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41828.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46093.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51262.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51555.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111813_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111813_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:37.94 +65:15:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111832_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111832_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111836_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111836_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111839_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111839_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111845_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111845_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111905_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111905_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111913_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111913_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111943_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111943_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111968_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111968_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111979_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111979_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:58.22 +63:38:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111982_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111982_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111996_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 111996_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:24.81 +59:53:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112008_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112008_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112041_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112041_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:21.23 +61:54:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112049_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112049_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112069_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112069_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112087_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112087_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112090_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112090_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112113_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112113_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112186_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112186_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:21.83 +59:52:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112203_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112203_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112219_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112219_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112222_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112222_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:20.46 +65:16:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112233_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112233_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:23.97 +59:25:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112251_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 112251_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41828_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 41828_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27146_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 27146_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46093_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 46093_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47936_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 47936_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69531_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 69531_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:33.84 +60:56:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51262_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 51262_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19221_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 19221_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:19.80 +64:56:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38010_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 38010_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43362_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 43362_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51555_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
Preparing report for the candidate 51555_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89130_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023
The candidate 89130_fd_Cam-10-Q2b1x1_2026-06-14_22-10-54_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0023 did not pass the final checks
