This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1283 2461206.6283 12.76 06:51:33.22 +62:43:30.8
153.01948 23.92203 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.3" and 1.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:51:33.22 +62:43:30.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:51:33.22 +62:43:30.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:51:33.22 +62:43:30.8: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6283,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1283 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1283 2461206.6283 11.89 07:16:29.81 +58:44:28.5
157.99322 26.11566 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:16:29.81 +58:44:28.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F7 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:16:29.81 +58:44:28.5: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:16:29.81 +58:44:28.5: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6283,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1283 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1283 2461206.6283 12.28 06:51:37.49 +64:00:12.6
151.65678 24.21526 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 0.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 1100282527162186368
Type: DSCT|GDOR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.970 G 13.000 G F
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:51:37.49 +64:00:12.6: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:51:37.49 +64:00:12.6: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 1100282527162186368,2461206.6283,12.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 1100282527162186368 20260615.1283 12.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1283 2461206.6283 12.16 06:44:42.36 +66:25:41.2
148.89010 24.04684 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 06:44:42.36 +66:25:41.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=1.130+/-0.030 (M)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:44:42.36 +66:25:41.2: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:44:42.36 +66:25:41.2: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6283,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1283 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1283 2461206.6283 12.09 07:14:17.92 +59:19:47.8
157.29364 25.93868 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:14:17.92 +59:19:47.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F2 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.319+/-0.032 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:14:17.92 +59:19:47.8: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:14:17.92 +59:19:47.8: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6283,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1283 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1283 2461206.6283 12.20 07:16:36.70 +58:40:15.1
158.07329 26.11830 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 0.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASASSN-V J071636.73+584019.7
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.180 g Y 0.410 g 2459344.64200 549.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:16:36.70 +58:40:15.1: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:16:36.70 +58:40:15.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J071636.73+584019.7,2461206.6283,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J071636.73+584019.7 20260615.1283 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1283 2461206.6283 12.44 07:06:55.48 +61:45:22.3
154.46548 25.47601 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 0.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 07:06:55.48 +61:45:22.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:06:55.48 +61:45:22.3: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:06:55.48 +61:45:22.3: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461206.6283,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260615.1283 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 15.1283 2461206.6283 12.17 06:30:03.89 +61:46:00.9
153.28877 21.25562 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 0.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS 2335197
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.121 g Y 0.473 g 2458368.99040 1.402486400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:30:03.89 +61:46:00.9: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:30:03.89 +61:46:00.9: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 2335197,2461206.6283,12.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 2335197 20260615.1283 12.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
First image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Last image: 2461206.62845700 15.06.2026 03:04:48.685 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 25
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14067
Objects passed selection criteria: 13963
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8607.5
Average stars matched: 8385.75 (97.4238 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119112 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 23:11:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
First image: 2461082.77034590 11.02.2026 06:29:07.886 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Last image: 2461206.62845700 15.06.2026 03:04:48.685 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 211
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 88091
Objects passed selection criteria: 87780
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 55386.2
Average stars matched: 53159.5 (95.9796 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1921548 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 23:13:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461206.62807505
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:39.435 +62:00:53.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:39.435 +62:00:53.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0282 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:39.428 +62:00:52.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:39.428 +62:00:52.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:39.435 +62:00:53.70
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:39.428 +62:00:52.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00022 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00022 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zvc3tgvPWF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uY7He2lJeh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NWLHf4Wx20
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kfwnh7zfMJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7789 out of 8335 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8335 out of 14996 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.880200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.880200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8213 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7789 out of 8335 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8335 out of 14996 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 14938 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8216 deg, Dec +55.3699 to +67.4016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8216 deg, Dec 55.3699 to 67.4016 deg
Loaded 12993 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7742 out of 8307 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8307 out of 14938 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 19 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.2 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
3.3 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.2 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zvc3tgvPWF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1166, passed=14996
Got 14996 stars (including 13804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14996 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14689 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=202 n_q2=259 n_q3=219 n_q4=291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.319
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uY7He2lJeh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1174, passed=14938
Got 14938 stars (including 13741 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14938 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 952 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14592 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14590 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=200 n_q2=258 n_q3=216 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NWLHf4Wx20 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=116, passed=2357
Got 2357 stars (including 2239 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 929 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2277 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=209 n_q2=284 n_q3=247 n_q4=217 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.314
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kfwnh7zfMJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=113, passed=2342
Got 2342 stars (including 2228 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2342 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 938 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2262 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.433 n_q1=209 n_q2=287 n_q3=259 n_q4=204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.336
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits sigma_overall=0.388 worst_q_ratio=1.319
ref2=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.197
new1=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits sigma_overall=0.443 worst_q_ratio=1.314
new2=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.336
reference average sigma_overall=0.404 worst_q_ratio=1.258
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256_astrometric_residuals.png (971 matched stars from wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018_astrometric_residuals.png (957 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20832_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20832_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20833_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20833_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20834_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20834_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20836_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20836_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20837_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20837_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20838_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20838_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20840_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20840_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20843_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20843_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20849_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20849_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20855_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20855_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20859_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20859_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20866_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20866_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20871_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20871_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20873_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20873_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20874_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20874_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20879_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20879_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20880_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 20880_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10092_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 10092_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04032_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 04032_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:39.435 +62:00:53.70 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:39.435 +62:00:53.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0282 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:39.428 +62:00:52.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:27.730 +61:59:54.29
Second-epoch image center 06:51:39.428 +62:00:52.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:39.435 +62:00:53.70
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:39.428 +62:00:52.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00022 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00022 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RjY8cVs4Aj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qtwhHoVA7I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eUW09Ciblt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W6nZZhfpgq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits and wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95446 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4161 deg
Loaded 13021 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6966 out of 8475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8475 out of 95446 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.757000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.757000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95446 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec +55.3698 to +67.4161 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8834 deg, Dec 55.3698 to 67.4161 deg
Loaded 13021 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6966 out of 8475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8475 out of 95446 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 96840 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.1384 to 122.8832 deg, Dec +55.3696 to +67.4163 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.1384 to 122.8832 deg, Dec 55.3696 to 67.4163 deg
Loaded 13020 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6924 out of 8478 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8478 out of 96840 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 178 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.0 pix Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.7 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RjY8cVs4Aj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7057, passed=95414
Got 95414 stars (including 88202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95414 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 953 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 971 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 93788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits N_match=971 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=206 n_q2=249 n_q3=225 n_q4=291 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qtwhHoVA7I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=7337, passed=96811
Got 96811 stars (including 89301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 96811 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 950 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.4 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=208 n_q2=252 n_q3=224 n_q4=286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eUW09Ciblt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=334, passed=15456
Got 15456 stars (including 15109 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15456 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14958 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14956 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=215 n_q2=283 n_q3=247 n_q4=215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.W6nZZhfpgq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=347, passed=15278
Got 15278 stars (including 14914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15278 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 961 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14705 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits N_match=960 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=211 n_q2=288 n_q3=259 n_q4=202 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0018.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_230843_TTUQ1b1x1_1327521_PVm9BTGZ/wcs_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:49:17.76 +61:43:54.6: 11.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:49:17.76 +61:43:54.6: 11.14 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.16 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:17.76 +61:43:54.6: ref_mag=11.16 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0543 delta=-0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:21.81 +57:05:57.2: 10.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:21.81 +57:05:57.2: 10.56 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.58 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:21.81 +57:05:57.2: ref_mag=10.58 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8752 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:53:08.36 +57:31:36.5: 10.90 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:56:29.41 +58:13:12.3: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:03:59.49 +56:52:28.9: 11.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:53:08.36 +57:31:36.5: 10.91 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.91 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:08.36 +57:31:36.5: ref_mag=10.91 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1587 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:52:37.34 +58:05:20.9: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:24.32 +58:13:38.8: 11.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:56:29.41 +58:13:12.3: 10.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.00 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:29.41 +58:13:12.3: ref_mag=11.00 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1422 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:58:20.82 +56:54:08.6: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:03:59.49 +56:52:28.9: 11.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:59.49 +56:52:28.9: ref_mag=11.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2422 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:52:37.34 +58:05:20.9: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.51 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:37.34 +58:05:20.9: ref_mag=11.51 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4447 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:24.32 +58:13:38.8: 11.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:59:21.08 +57:03:17.1: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:24.32 +58:13:38.8: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.3109 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:58:20.82 +56:54:08.6: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:20.82 +56:54:08.6: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4966 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:59:21.08 +57:03:17.1: 11.26 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.27 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:21.08 +57:03:17.1: ref_mag=11.27 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4336 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:20.82 +57:00:16.3: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:56:33.05 +57:40:49.2: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:53.10 +58:12:43.5: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:56:21.03 +57:14:23.4: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:56:00.21 +57:55:25.0: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:16.53 +57:24:58.4: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:20.82 +57:00:16.3: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:56:33.05 +57:40:49.2: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:20.82 +57:00:16.3: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6110 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:33.05 +57:40:49.2: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6101 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:53.10 +58:12:43.5: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:53.10 +58:12:43.5: ref_mag=11.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6055 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:56:21.03 +57:14:23.4: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:56:00.21 +57:55:25.0: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:15.51 +58:25:32.0: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:16.53 +57:24:58.4: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:21.03 +57:14:23.4: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6446 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:56:00.21 +57:55:25.0: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5250 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:57:23.56 +57:32:53.1: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:16.53 +57:24:58.4: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6334 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:00:46.94 +56:53:52.2: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:52:19.01 +58:26:28.5: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:15.51 +58:25:32.0: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:57:23.56 +57:32:53.1: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:15.51 +58:25:32.0: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4748 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:23.56 +57:32:53.1: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6650 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:00:46.94 +56:53:52.2: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:51:52.30 +58:24:34.0: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:46.94 +56:53:52.2: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6726 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:53:27.84 +58:12:08.6: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:52:37.76 +57:47:34.1: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:52:13.00 +58:06:29.6: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:54:35.96 +57:18:54.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:52:19.01 +58:26:28.5: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:00:35.17 +56:59:52.0: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:19.01 +58:26:28.5: ref_mag=11.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6696 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:51:52.30 +58:24:34.0: 11.58 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:53:27.84 +58:12:08.6: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:52.30 +58:24:34.0: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5610 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:27.84 +58:12:08.6: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6480 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:52:37.76 +57:47:34.1: 11.59 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:37.76 +57:47:34.1: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6681 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:00:57.19 +56:57:09.0: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:52:13.00 +58:06:29.6: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:13.00 +58:06:29.6: ref_mag=11.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6609 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:54:35.96 +57:18:54.6: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.64 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:35.96 +57:18:54.6: ref_mag=11.64 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7797 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:52:25.96 +57:40:12.8: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:00:35.17 +56:59:52.0: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:35.17 +56:59:52.0: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7763 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:57:40.42 +57:32:56.4: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:00:57.19 +56:57:09.0: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:57.19 +56:57:09.0: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7094 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:52:25.96 +57:40:12.8: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:25.96 +57:40:12.8: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6802 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:57:40.42 +57:32:56.4: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:40.42 +57:32:56.4: ref_mag=11.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7281 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:00:26.55 +57:12:05.1: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:05.35 +58:27:48.7: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:53:23.35 +57:49:25.4: 11.95 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:53:46.76 +58:44:51.7: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:09.99 +58:20:04.3: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:00:26.55 +57:12:05.1: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:26.55 +57:12:05.1: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7812 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:03:58.28 +57:08:34.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:05.35 +58:27:48.7: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:53:23.35 +57:49:25.4: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:05.35 +58:27:48.7: ref_mag=11.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8009 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:53:46.76 +58:44:51.7: 12.07 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:23.35 +57:49:25.4: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7528 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:46.76 +58:44:51.7: ref_mag=12.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8420 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:22.98 +56:55:30.5: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:09.99 +58:20:04.3: 12.11 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:09.99 +58:20:04.3: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7674 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:52:53.04 +57:13:11.2: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:03:58.28 +57:08:34.6: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:58.28 +57:08:34.6: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8241 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:58:57.28 +57:59:51.3: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:22.98 +56:55:30.5: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:22.98 +56:55:30.5: ref_mag=11.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9047 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:52:53.04 +57:13:11.2: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:53:58.48 +57:49:28.0: 11.96 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.65 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:52:53.04 +57:13:11.2: ref_mag=11.65 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9451 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:19:11.89 +59:08:35.6: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:58:57.28 +57:59:51.3: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:57.28 +57:59:51.3: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8232 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:51:33.22 +62:43:30.8: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:53:58.48 +57:49:28.0: 11.97 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.96 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:53:58.48 +57:49:28.0: ref_mag=11.96 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7821 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:19:11.89 +59:08:35.6: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:11.89 +59:08:35.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1195 delta=0.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:44:42.36 +66:25:41.2: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:16:29.81 +58:44:28.5: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:51:37.49 +64:00:12.6: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:14:17.92 +59:19:47.8: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:51:33.22 +62:43:30.8: 16.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:16:29.81 +58:44:28.5: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:44:42.36 +66:25:41.2: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:16:29.81 +58:44:28.5: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8440 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:44:42.36 +66:25:41.2: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1645 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:14:17.92 +59:19:47.8: 13.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:51:37.49 +64:00:12.6: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:14:17.92 +59:19:47.8: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0670 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:51:37.49 +64:00:12.6: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2017 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:15:26.96 +58:26:40.6: 12.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 05:55:01.75 +58:06:01.0: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:15:26.96 +58:26:40.6: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:15:26.96 +58:26:40.6: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7778 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:16:36.70 +58:40:15.1: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 07:06:55.48 +61:45:22.3: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 05:55:01.75 +58:06:01.0: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:01.75 +58:06:01.0: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7926 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:16:36.70 +58:40:15.1: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:16:36.70 +58:40:15.1: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1720 delta=1.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 07:06:55.48 +61:45:22.3: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:06:55.48 +61:45:22.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4392 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0255.fits at 06:30:03.89 +61:46:00.9: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-29-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits at 06:30:03.89 +61:46:00.9: 13.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:30:03.89 +61:46:00.9: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1720 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07360.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out27482.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out45497.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48211.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64229.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64608.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84285.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113880_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113880_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113882_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113882_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113885_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113885_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113886_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113886_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113887_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113887_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113889_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113889_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113890_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113890_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113891_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113891_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113892_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113892_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113893_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113893_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113896_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113896_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113897_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113897_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113898_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113898_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113900_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113900_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113901_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113901_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113905_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113905_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113907_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113907_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113908_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113908_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113912_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113912_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113917_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113917_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113918_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113918_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113921_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113921_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113924_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113924_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113926_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113926_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113933_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113933_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113934_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113934_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113935_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113935_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113937_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113937_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113941_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113941_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113942_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113942_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113944_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113944_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113948_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113948_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113949_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113949_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113951_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113951_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113952_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113952_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113955_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113955_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113957_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113957_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113959_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113959_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113960_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113960_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113961_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113961_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113962_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113962_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113965_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113965_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113966_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113966_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113967_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113967_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113968_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113968_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113969_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113969_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113970_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113970_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113971_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113971_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113972_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113972_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113976_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113976_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113978_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113978_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113979_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113979_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113984_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113984_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113989_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113989_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113992_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113992_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113994_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 113994_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114000_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114000_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114001_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114001_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114004_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114004_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114005_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114005_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114006_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114006_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114007_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114007_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114008_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114008_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114010_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114010_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114011_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114011_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114019_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114019_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114020_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114020_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114021_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114021_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114023_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114023_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114028_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114028_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114031_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114031_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114032_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114032_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114036_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114036_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114040_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114040_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114046_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114046_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114047_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114047_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114055_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114055_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114057_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114057_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114058_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114058_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114061_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114061_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114064_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114064_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114066_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114066_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114070_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114070_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114076_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114076_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114081_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114081_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114082_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114082_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114083_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114083_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114084_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114084_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114090_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114090_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114091_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114091_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114093_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114093_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114094_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114094_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114096_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114096_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114098_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114098_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114099_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114099_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114100_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114100_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114103_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114103_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114104_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114104_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114111_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114111_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114112_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114112_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114113_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114113_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114114_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114114_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114117_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114117_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114119_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114119_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114120_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114120_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114130_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114130_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114133_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114133_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114136_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114136_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114137_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114137_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114138_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114138_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114139_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114139_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114141_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114141_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114142_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114142_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114143_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114143_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114144_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114144_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114145_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114145_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114146_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114146_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114149_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114149_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114151_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114151_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114153_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114153_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114154_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114154_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114155_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114155_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114157_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114157_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114160_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114160_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114161_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114161_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114165_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114165_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114166_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114166_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114168_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114168_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114169_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114169_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114172_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114172_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114173_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114173_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114174_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114174_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114175_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114175_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114176_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114176_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114177_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114177_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114179_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114179_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114181_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114181_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114187_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114187_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114190_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114190_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114193_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114193_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114199_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114199_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114204_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114204_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114205_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114205_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114211_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114211_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114214_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114214_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114220_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114220_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114222_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114222_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:24.73 +59:53:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114232_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114232_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114233_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114233_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114242_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114242_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114247_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114247_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114270_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114270_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114289_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114289_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114299_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 114299_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114302_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 114302_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64229_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 64229_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27482_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 27482_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07360_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 07360_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64608_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 64608_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59135_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 59135_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62051_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 62051_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69531_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 69531_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43283_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 43283_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24257_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 24257_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19221_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 19221_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15754_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 15754_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72995_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 72995_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82281_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 82281_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18318_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 18318_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24726_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 24726_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75769_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 75769_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01925_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 01925_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84285_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 84285_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45497_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 45497_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27588_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 27588_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:20.82 +64:06:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56540_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 56540_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48211_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
Preparing report for the candidate 48211_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89130_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019
The candidate 89130_fd_Cam-10-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_22-04-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0019 did not pass the final checks
