This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2438 2461205.7438 12.47 23:49:51.91 +64:26:27.1
116.35022 2.35880 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J2349518+642627
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.957 g Y 0.533 g 2458657.76720 236.834949400000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:49:51.91 +64:26:27.1: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:49:51.91 +64:26:27.1: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2438* 23 49 51.91 +64 26 27.1 12.5 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J2349518+642627,2461205.7438,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J2349518+642627 20260614.2438 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2438 2461205.7438 13.04 23:44:24.72 +61:10:54.5
114.94304 -0.64601 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J234424.71+611056.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.510 V 14.670 V 2458306.00000 485.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:44:24.72 +61:10:54.5: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:44:24.72 +61:10:54.5: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2438* 23 44 24.72 +61 10 54.5 13.0 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J234424.71+611056.1,2461205.7438,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J234424.71+611056.1 20260614.2438 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2438 2461205.7438 13.19 23:23:41.12 +61:51:51.0
112.78382 0.73373 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 5.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS 1473846
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
16.920 g Y 0.850 g 2451338.36000 97.437006700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:23:41.12 +61:51:51.0: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:23:41.12 +61:51:51.0: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2438* 23 23 41.12 +61 51 51.0 13.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 1473846,2461205.7438,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 1473846 20260614.2438 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2438 2461205.7438 12.17 23:51:27.14 +62:51:47.1
116.15318 0.78350 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" EO Cas
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.700 V < 14.400 V 2429908.00000 455.000000000000 Se
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:51:27.14 +62:51:47.1: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:51:27.14 +62:51:47.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2438* 23 51 27.14 +62 51 47.1 12.2 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EO Cas,2461205.7438,12.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EO Cas 20260614.2438 12.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.57276170 09.01.2026 01:44:36.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
First image: 2461049.57276170 09.01.2026 01:44:36.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Last image: 2461205.74403424 14.06.2026 05:51:14.558 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27371
Objects passed selection criteria: 27190
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18110.2
Average stars matched: 17355.2 (95.8311 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 01:40:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.57276170 09.01.2026 01:44:36.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
First image: 2461049.57276170 09.01.2026 01:44:36.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Last image: 2461205.74403424 14.06.2026 05:51:14.558 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 143
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 75 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 198115
Objects passed selection criteria: 197410
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 133269
Average stars matched: 128709 (96.5785 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2020892 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 01:48:39 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.74349700
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Image size: 943.5'x628.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.941 +61:59:19.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:39.385 +61:58:11.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.941 +61:59:19.93
Second-epoch image center 23:59:39.385 +61:58:11.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0427 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:38.357 +61:57:39.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.941 +61:59:19.93
Second-epoch image center 23:59:38.357 +61:57:39.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0490 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:39.385 +61:58:11.57
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:38.357 +61:57:39.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00914 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AJFVSYELls
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V07OdPwVj8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0DkpCGqmE2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aVInFcvgO1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 28928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9986 deg, Dec +55.3299 to +67.4085 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9986 deg, Dec 55.3299 to 67.4085 deg
Loaded 133379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1544 out of 1735 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1735 out of 28928 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.950350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.950350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.24
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 28928 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0003 to 359.9986 deg, Dec +55.3299 to +67.4085 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0003 to 359.9986 deg, Dec 55.3299 to 67.4085 deg
Loaded 133379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1544 out of 1735 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1735 out of 28928 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 30191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0001 to 359.9985 deg, Dec +55.2732 to +67.4066 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0001 to 359.9985 deg, Dec 55.2732 to 67.4066 deg
Loaded 134187 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2225 out of 2505 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2505 out of 30191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
2.1 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.6 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.0 pix wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
15.2 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AJFVSYELls (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3732, passed=28928
Got 28928 stars (including 25166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28928 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013104 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010483 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1650 through 0 to 19.9061, gap 19.9061 to 341.1650
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26071 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.50"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1694 through 0 to 19.9054, gap 19.9054 to 341.1694
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26087 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.29"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.977 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.661 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.496 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.553 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.358 n_q1=148 n_q2=274 n_q3=232 n_q4=314 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.840
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.V07OdPwVj8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3591, passed=30191
Got 30191 stars (including 26565 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30191 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1617 through 0 to 20.0679, gap 20.0679 to 341.1617
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1680 through 0 to 20.0648, gap 20.0648 to 341.1680
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27228 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 963 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28093 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.24"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=963 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.986 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.748 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.552 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.462 n_q1=158 n_q2=269 n_q3=235 n_q4=301 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.880
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0DkpCGqmE2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=391, passed=7244
Got 7244 stars (including 6847 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7244 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9902 through 0 to 12.6831, gap 12.6831 to 340.9902
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.3 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7148 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9896 through 0 to 12.6838, gap 12.6838 to 340.9896
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.3 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7149 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.622 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=413 n_q2=93 n_q3=385 n_q4=79 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.454
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aVInFcvgO1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, passed=6532
Got 6532 stars (including 6160 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6532 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9902 through 0 to 12.6832, gap 12.6832 to 340.9902
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.3 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.9891 through 0 to 12.6837, gap 12.6837 to 340.9891
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 731 to 788 (Dec 56.3 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 970 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=970 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.411 n_q1=459 n_q2=86 n_q3=381 n_q4=44 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.554
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits sigma_overall=1.977 worst_q_ratio=0.840
ref2=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits sigma_overall=1.986 worst_q_ratio=0.880
new1=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.428 worst_q_ratio=1.454
new2=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.554
reference average sigma_overall=1.9815 worst_q_ratio=0.86
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011_astrometric_residuals.png (968 matched stars from wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.05 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014_astrometric_residuals.png (963 matched stars from wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 1.03 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (970 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32819_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 32819_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:11:00.17 +60:33:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32917_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 32917_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:57.17 +62:18:46.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32926_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 32926_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:11:26.87 +62:58:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 19779_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:39:35.14 +59:35:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14990_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 14990_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:48:13.94 +61:01:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Image size: 943.5'x628.6' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.90"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:58.941 +61:59:19.93 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.91"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:39.385 +61:58:11.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.941 +61:59:19.93
Second-epoch image center 23:59:39.385 +61:58:11.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0427 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Image size: 942.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:38.357 +61:57:39.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:58.941 +61:59:19.93
Second-epoch image center 23:59:38.357 +61:57:39.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0490 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:39.385 +61:58:11.57
Second-epoch second image center 23:59:38.357 +61:57:39.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00914 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bIluzWvw6G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PDeXRSx69X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dhZLtUR7bp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I9WugVYtZB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits and wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 221423 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0000 to 360.0000 deg, Dec +55.2740 to +67.4143 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0000 to 360.0000 deg, Dec 55.2740 to 67.4143 deg
Loaded 134218 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1189 out of 1822 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1822 out of 221423 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.816000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.816000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 221423 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0000 to 360.0000 deg, Dec +55.2740 to +67.4143 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0000 to 360.0000 deg, Dec 55.2740 to 67.4143 deg
Loaded 134218 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1189 out of 1822 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 1822 out of 221423 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 214713 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 0.0000 to 359.9999 deg, Dec +55.2732 to +67.4119 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 0.0000 to 359.9999 deg, Dec 55.2732 to 67.4119 deg
Loaded 134220 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1658 out of 2593 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2593 out of 214713 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 132 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
1.9 pix Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
1.8 pix wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
1.9 pix wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
15.4 mag. Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bIluzWvw6G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=35640, passed=221356
Got 221356 stars (including 185389 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 221356 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013104 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010483 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1650 through 0 to 20.0671, gap 20.0671 to 341.1650
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 937 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1694 through 0 to 20.0670, gap 20.0670 to 341.1694
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208697 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 965 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 214179 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.32"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits N_match=965 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.705 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.700 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.281 n_q1=165 n_q2=248 n_q3=255 n_q4=297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.997
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PDeXRSx69X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits' -> 'wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=18, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=70, blended=34839, passed=214625
Got 214625 stars (including 179502 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 214625 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013106 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010484 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1617 through 0 to 20.1548, gap 20.1548 to 341.1617
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200062 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 341.1669 through 0 to 20.1485, gap 20.1485 to 341.1669
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 951 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 200072 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 950 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 202879 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.16"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1023)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits N_match=950 sigma_overall_arcsec=1.810 sigma_q1_arcsec=1.631 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.169 sigma_q4_arcsec=1.357 n_q1=178 n_q2=248 n_q3=241 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=0.901
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits -region wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dhZLtUR7bp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=3312, passed=52645
Got 52645 stars (including 49280 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52645 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.7929 through 0 to 15.8622, gap 15.8622 to 340.7929
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.7918 through 0 to 15.8627, gap 15.8627 to 340.7918
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.428 n_q1=403 n_q2=92 n_q3=391 n_q4=82 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.475
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.I9WugVYtZB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2805, passed=47263
Got 47263 stars (including 44392 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47263 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013092 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010473 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.7781 through 0 to 15.8530, gap 15.8530 to 340.7781
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 967 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 340.7769 through 0 to 15.8536, gap 15.8536 to 340.7769
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.8 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 968 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46571 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=968 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.588 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=447 n_q2=79 n_q3=396 n_q4=46 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.395
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-50-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_011131_TTUQ1b1x1_3721491_x0PepGdQ/wcs_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cas-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:10:23.29 +58:05:48.2: 12.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:36:27.40 +61:42:47.9: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:13:32.49 +61:30:09.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:36:27.40 +61:42:47.9: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:10:23.29 +58:05:48.2: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:36:27.40 +61:42:47.9: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0930 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:10:23.29 +58:05:48.2: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9976 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:44:19.10 +61:47:49.1: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:22:57.20 +60:08:13.8: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:13:32.49 +61:30:09.4: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:13:32.49 +61:30:09.4: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3520 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:44:19.10 +61:47:49.1: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:22:57.20 +60:08:13.8: 11.93 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:19.10 +61:47:49.1: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2491 delta=0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:22:57.20 +60:08:13.8: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2952 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 00:15:53.76 +60:58:39.1: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:46:04.83 +62:41:01.8: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:43:42.66 +62:44:53.2: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:24:21.04 +61:36:24.1: 13.30 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:52:26.89 +61:52:11.5: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 00:15:53.76 +60:58:39.1: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:53.76 +60:58:39.1: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3445 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:55:17.04 +58:06:32.3: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:54:03.90 +61:35:50.6: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:46:04.83 +62:41:01.8: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:46:04.83 +62:41:01.8: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5549 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:43:42.66 +62:44:53.2: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:24:21.04 +61:36:24.1: 13.13 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:42.66 +62:44:53.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6247 delta=0.72 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:21.04 +61:36:24.1: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.4929 delta=0.71 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:52:26.89 +61:52:11.5: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:26.89 +61:52:11.5: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5135 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:55:17.04 +58:06:32.3: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:17.04 +58:06:32.3: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4941 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:54:03.90 +61:35:50.6: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:03.90 +61:35:50.6: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5466 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:40:46.44 +64:03:50.0: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:06:09.32 +63:11:38.3: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:44:09.16 +62:44:26.3: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:40:46.44 +64:03:50.0: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:46.44 +64:03:50.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8365 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:51:22.37 +62:35:15.3: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:06:09.32 +63:11:38.3: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:06:09.32 +63:11:38.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0226 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:44:09.16 +62:44:26.3: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:44:09.16 +62:44:26.3: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9017 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:40:39.17 +61:52:52.8: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:24:24.65 +61:36:03.6: 13.78 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:51:22.37 +62:35:15.3: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:50:44.27 +60:55:03.5: 13.07 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:22.37 +62:35:15.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0264 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:40:39.17 +61:52:52.8: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:39.17 +61:52:52.8: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1149 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:24:24.65 +61:36:03.6: 13.71 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:24:24.65 +61:36:03.6: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.1768 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:50:44.27 +60:55:03.5: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:20:00.72 +60:16:00.7: 13.51 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:44.27 +60:55:03.5: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9435 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:20:00.72 +60:16:00.7: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:31:08.19 +61:02:06.3: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:20:00.72 +60:16:00.7: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2505 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:41:32.29 +62:44:30.2: 14.81 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:31:08.19 +61:02:06.3: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:08.19 +61:02:06.3: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2848 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:50:40.34 +63:02:31.0: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:41:32.29 +62:44:30.2: 14.26 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:32.29 +62:44:30.2: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.5560 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:49:51.91 +64:26:27.1: 14.22 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:50:40.34 +63:02:31.0: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:40.34 +63:02:31.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2360 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:49:51.91 +64:26:27.1: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:49:51.91 +64:26:27.1: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4561 delta=1.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:44:24.72 +61:10:54.5: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:12:30.52 +59:58:23.1: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:23:41.12 +61:51:51.0: 14.51 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:44:24.72 +61:10:54.5: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:44:24.72 +61:10:54.5: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0420 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:12:30.52 +59:58:23.1: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:12:30.52 +59:58:23.1: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5696 delta=0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:23:41.12 +61:51:51.0: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:23:41.12 +61:51:51.0: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1889 delta=1.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_19-44-36_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0011.fits at 23:51:27.14 +62:51:47.1: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_19-33-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0014.fits at 23:51:27.14 +62:51:47.1: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 23:51:27.14 +62:51:47.1: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1332 delta=1.31 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101165.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119246.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out39122.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75614.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248176_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248176_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248178_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248178_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:10:04.67 +59:13:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248183_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248183_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:55:22.93 +61:33:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248186_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248186_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248187_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248187_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:21:03.55 +60:59:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248189_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248189_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:07:57.12 +59:39:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248190_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248190_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:59:50.70 +57:53:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248193_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248193_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:56.99 +59:48:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248195_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:53.12 +59:44:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248196_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:17:23.62 +59:43:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248198_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248198_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:00:11.60 +57:37:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248201_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248201_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248202_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248202_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:15:36.16 +59:47:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248204_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248204_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:05:48.83 +59:06:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248205_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248205_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:58.76 +61:02:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248206_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248206_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:50.58 +61:36:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248375_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248375_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248397_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248397_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:10:59.06 +60:33:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248445_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248445_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:48:31.23 +62:14:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248454_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248454_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:49.80 +59:20:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248468_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248468_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:24.37 +61:38:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248583_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248583_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248605_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248605_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:38.49 +61:37:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248606_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248606_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:59:00.25 +59:49:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248607_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248607_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248612_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248612_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:55:26.77 +58:05:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248641_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248641_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:38:41.62 +61:19:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:41.27 +61:39:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248665_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248665_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:57:11.70 +59:56:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248669_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248669_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:23.58 +61:37:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248679_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248679_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:01:39.48 +57:05:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:03:12.93 +60:26:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248714_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248714_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:25:04.83 +61:35:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248722_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248722_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:53:03.85 +61:57:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248723_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248723_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:27:19.04 +65:35:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248735_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248735_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:01:36.70 +61:32:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248740_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248740_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248743_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248743_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:07.87 +62:18:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248753_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248753_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248771_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248771_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:12:27.97 +57:05:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248785_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248785_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248792_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248792_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248796_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248796_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248806_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248806_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:36.40 +64:05:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248814_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248819_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248819_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248823_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248823_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:20:43.69 +61:14:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248824_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248824_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:57:31.74 +61:02:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248847_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248847_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 22:59:10.50 +58:14:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248862_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248862_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:20:10.34 +61:08:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248894_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248894_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:42.58 +60:43:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248899_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248899_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:26:43.68 +64:36:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248901_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248901_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:04.67 +64:49:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248914_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248914_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248917_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248917_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:02:50.61 +59:34:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248920_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248920_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:20:50.14 +57:13:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248936_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248936_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248940_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248940_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:52.61 +61:20:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248970_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248970_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:08:48.29 +59:17:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248981_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248981_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:32:41.50 +57:53:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 248988_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 248988_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249003_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249003_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:06:25.25 +58:53:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249015_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249015_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:05.74 +65:12:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249028_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:43.26 +66:07:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249037_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249037_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:23:49.35 +60:28:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249070_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249070_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249077_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249077_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:24:34.80 +61:37:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249081_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249081_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:21:09.20 +62:02:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249082_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249082_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:06.99 +57:15:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249090_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249090_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:52:01.75 +65:39:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249092_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249092_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:48:45.50 +61:16:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249094_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249094_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249100_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249100_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:04:37.96 +64:04:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249104_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249104_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249107_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249117_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249117_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:00:28.17 +63:14:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249135_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249135_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:04.29 +66:55:10.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249144_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249144_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:33.97 +64:06:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249156_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249156_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:38:29.05 +58:40:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249192_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249192_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:43:14.62 +62:55:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249209_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249209_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:15:26.19 +57:27:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249210_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249210_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249236_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249236_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:18.80 +61:28:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249271_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249271_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:59:33.64 +60:17:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249283_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249283_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:33.96 +59:35:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249296_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249296_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:28:05.64 +61:54:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249308_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249308_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:22:04.83 +61:21:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249321_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249321_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:31:23.68 +64:01:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249336_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249336_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:00:35.14 +63:16:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249342_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249342_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:23:34.26 +65:45:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249346_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249346_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249356_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249356_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:42:50.49 +61:34:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249365_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249365_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:14.28 +61:17:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249389_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249389_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:40.39 +60:42:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249398_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249398_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 249408_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 249408_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:50:43.44 +63:16:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135772_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 135772_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:40.24 +60:22:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70699_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70699_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70898_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 70898_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:11:26.93 +62:58:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39122_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 39122_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124521_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 124521_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:48:13.97 +61:01:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195348_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 195348_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:36.52 +58:43:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132999_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 132999_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:12:57.47 +60:34:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 209690_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:03.98 +57:06:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119246_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 119246_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233972_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 233972_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:05:48.17 +56:56:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47281_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 47281_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:53:52.78 +64:01:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125649_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 125649_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:25:17.35 +60:57:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101165_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 101165_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232679_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 232679_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 92653_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:50:59.59 +62:08:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186935_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 186935_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:33:13.49 +58:27:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159429_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 159429_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:39:35.15 +59:35:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91177_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 91177_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:57:22.01 +62:10:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97063_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 97063_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:07:05.49 +61:48:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29265_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 29265_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:29:25.15 +64:59:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 87801_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:39:27.03 +62:23:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137397_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 137397_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:16:55.36 +60:26:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137126_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 137126_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:04:36.36 +60:18:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140199_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 140199_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:21:31.93 +60:22:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 189730_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:36.14 +58:25:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 208858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 208858_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:05:54.65 +57:04:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75614_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
Preparing report for the candidate 75614_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 118759_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:01:36.98 +61:13:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94530_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 94530_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:48:50.43 +62:12:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158549_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 158549_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:30.57 +59:33:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167527_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 167527_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:09:12.33 +59:08:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186017_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 186017_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:16.61 +58:26:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192512_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 192512_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:03.94 +58:39:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13201_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 13201_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:02:36.70 +66:05:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171430_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 171430_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:54:23.07 +57:30:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171429_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163
The candidate 171429_fd_Cas-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-51-14_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0163 did not pass the final checks
