This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.61 11:16:10.24 +64:41:18.7
138.34574 49.49146 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:16:10.24 +64:41:18.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:16:10.24 +64:41:18.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:16:10.24 +64:41:18.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 11 16 10.24 +64 41 18.7 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.69 11:22:53.69 +62:18:52.9
139.40993 51.88779 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.6" and 1.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 11:22:53.69 +62:18:52.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:22:53.69 +62:18:52.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:22:53.69 +62:18:52.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 11 22 53.69 +62 18 52.9 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.26 09:17:23.85 +61:22:42.2
153.52639 40.82803 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:17:23.85 +61:22:42.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 09:17:23.85 +61:22:42.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:17:23.85 +61:22:42.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 09 17 23.85 +61 22 42.2 14.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.62 09:40:33.33 +61:46:17.9
151.63759 43.23151 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:40:33.33 +61:46:17.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 09:40:33.33 +61:46:17.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:40:33.33 +61:46:17.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 09 40 33.33 +61 46 17.9 14.6 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.68 10:09:53.96 +58:07:10.9
153.80850 48.17957 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:09:53.96 +58:07:10.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:09:53.96 +58:07:10.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:09:53.96 +58:07:10.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 10 09 53.96 +58 07 10.9 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.72 10:59:15.09 +59:06:55.5
146.35134 52.60975 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.8" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:59:15.09 +59:06:55.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:59:15.09 +59:06:55.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:59:15.09 +59:06:55.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 10 59 15.09 +59 06 55.5 14.7 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.85 10:07:06.99 +64:29:25.1
146.29260 44.46291 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.4" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:07:06.99 +64:29:25.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:07:06.99 +64:29:25.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:07:06.99 +64:29:25.1: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 10 07 06.99 +64 29 25.1 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.82 10:09:05.38 +62:11:42.1
148.80654 45.93953 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.5" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:09:05.38 +62:11:42.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:09:05.38 +62:11:42.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:09:05.38 +62:11:42.1: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 10 09 05.38 +62 11 42.1 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.2317 2461205.7317 14.93 09:57:17.42 +63:54:34.9
147.78813 43.88887 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:57:17.42 +63:54:34.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 09:57:17.42 +63:54:34.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:57:17.42 +63:54:34.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 06 14.2317* 09 57 17.42 +63 54 34.9 14.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461205.7317,14.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260614.2317 14.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.80532322 11.02.2026 07:19:29.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
First image: 2461082.80532322 11.02.2026 07:19:29.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Last image: 2461205.73186214 14.06.2026 05:33:42.889 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7588
Objects passed selection criteria: 7570
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6394.5
Average stars matched: 6187 (96.755 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:43:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.80532322 11.02.2026 07:19:29.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
First image: 2461082.80532322 11.02.2026 07:19:29.926 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Last image: 2461205.73186214 14.06.2026 05:33:42.889 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 41591
Objects passed selection criteria: 41475
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 35468.5
Average stars matched: 34109 (96.167 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141776 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jun 14 00:45:46 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.73147522
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:29.183 +62:01:00.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80
Second-epoch image center 10:17:29.183 +62:01:00.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:29.253 +62:01:00.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80
Second-epoch image center 10:17:29.253 +62:01:00.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0540 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:29.183 +62:01:00.92
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:29.253 +62:01:00.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00023 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00023 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uTlbazi944
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MQrHQkH9sN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gbGfsSsqnW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C8hxPvZGvW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7643 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1814 to 172.7540 deg, Dec +55.2234 to +67.4791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1814 to 172.7540 deg, Dec 55.2234 to 67.4791 deg
Loaded 7304 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4370 out of 4605 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4605 out of 7643 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.36
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7643 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1814 to 172.7540 deg, Dec +55.2234 to +67.4791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1814 to 172.7540 deg, Dec 55.2234 to 67.4791 deg
Loaded 7304 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4370 out of 4605 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4605 out of 7643 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1813 to 172.7538 deg, Dec +55.2234 to +67.4798 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1813 to 172.7538 deg, Dec 55.2234 to 67.4798 deg
Loaded 7305 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4361 out of 4610 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4610 out of 7662 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
2.1 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
2.1 pix wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uTlbazi944 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, passed=7643
Got 7643 stars (including 7078 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7643 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 974 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.304 n_q1=236 n_q2=225 n_q3=242 n_q4=275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.317
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MQrHQkH9sN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=562, passed=7662
Got 7662 stars (including 7088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7662 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 972 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7579 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=229 n_q2=228 n_q3=238 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.359
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gbGfsSsqnW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=284, passed=5265
Got 5265 stars (including 4970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5265 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5168 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=276 n_q2=249 n_q3=242 n_q4=210 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.082
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C8hxPvZGvW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=343, passed=5225
Got 5225 stars (including 4872 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5130 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 977 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits N_match=977 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=278 n_q2=245 n_q3=256 n_q4=198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.317
ref2=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.359
new1=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits sigma_overall=0.300 worst_q_ratio=1.082
new2=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits sigma_overall=0.306 worst_q_ratio=1.141
reference average sigma_overall=0.3715 worst_q_ratio=1.338
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305_astrometric_residuals.png (978 matched stars from wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141_astrometric_residuals.png (977 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20647_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 20647_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:29.183 +62:01:00.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80
Second-epoch image center 10:17:29.183 +62:01:00.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Image size: 941.6'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 10:17:29.253 +62:01:00.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:17:03.928 +61:59:42.80
Second-epoch image center 10:17:29.253 +62:01:00.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0540 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:17:29.183 +62:01:00.92
Second-epoch second image center 10:17:29.253 +62:01:00.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00023 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00023 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FBMrceGlFz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EmaSfCNqGj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits &> /tmp/tmp.i2IwXrpctY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ku8hodv2MS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits and wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 42264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1815 to 172.8776 deg, Dec +55.2077 to +67.4859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1815 to 172.8776 deg, Dec 55.2077 to 67.4859 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4155 out of 4668 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4668 out of 42264 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.756400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.756400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 42264 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1815 to 172.8776 deg, Dec +55.2077 to +67.4859 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1815 to 172.8776 deg, Dec 55.2077 to 67.4859 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4155 out of 4668 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4668 out of 42264 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 42564 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 134.1813 to 172.8782 deg, Dec +55.2076 to +67.4899 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 134.1813 to 172.8782 deg, Dec 55.2076 to 67.4899 deg
Loaded 7342 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4153 out of 4662 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4662 out of 42564 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 103 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
1.9 pix UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
1.9 pix wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FBMrceGlFz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=1963, passed=42243
Got 42243 stars (including 40203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41746 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 982 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits N_match=982 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.480 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=235 n_q2=225 n_q3=245 n_q4=277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.390
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EmaSfCNqGj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1976, passed=42549
Got 42549 stars (including 40495 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 42549 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 979 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41998 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 980 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 980 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 980 stars left (next iteration limit 1078)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits N_match=980 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.501 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=232 n_q2=223 n_q3=242 n_q4=283 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.i2IwXrpctY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=877, passed=29317
Got 29317 stars (including 28393 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29317 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 968 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=273 n_q2=252 n_q3=242 n_q4=211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ku8hodv2MS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=898, passed=28710
Got 28710 stars (including 27770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28710 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 964 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28164 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 978 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 978 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28165 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 978 stars left (next iteration limit 1075)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits N_match=978 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=275 n_q2=251 n_q3=253 n_q4=199 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.093
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-09_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0140.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-14_CI_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_004128_TTUQ1b1x1_2142095_U19s2VFx/wcs_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:13:50.00 +63:29:17.7: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:16:10.24 +64:41:18.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:13:50.00 +63:29:17.7: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:13:50.00 +63:29:17.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7288 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:16:10.24 +64:41:18.7: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:22:53.69 +62:18:52.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 09:17:23.85 +61:22:42.2: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:22:53.69 +62:18:52.9: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:17:23.85 +61:22:42.2: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 11:27:59.49 +64:48:52.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 09:40:33.33 +61:46:17.9: 16.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:09:53.96 +58:07:10.9: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:59:15.09 +59:06:55.5: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 11:27:59.49 +64:48:52.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:59.49 +64:48:52.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:40:33.33 +61:46:17.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:09:53.96 +58:07:10.9: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:07:06.99 +64:29:25.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:59:15.09 +59:06:55.5: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 10:09:05.38 +62:11:42.1: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:07:06.99 +64:29:25.1: 16.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 10:09:05.38 +62:11:42.1: 16.23 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-19-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits at 09:57:17.42 +63:54:34.9: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-20-06_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits at 09:57:17.42 +63:54:34.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54501.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54723.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54774.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55031.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55050.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55056.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55116.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55127.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55146.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53042_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53042_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53049_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53049_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53146_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53146_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53283_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53283_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53351_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53351_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53427_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53427_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53430_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53430_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53452_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53452_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53453_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53484_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53484_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53504_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53504_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53515_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53515_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53713_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53713_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53737_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53737_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53780_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53780_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53806_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53806_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53882_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53882_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53885_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53885_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53896_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53896_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53904_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53904_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53926_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53926_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53943_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 53943_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54025_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54025_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54074_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54074_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54092_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54092_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54097_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54097_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54120_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54120_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54121_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54121_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54138_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54138_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54142_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54142_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:57:24.47 +57:25:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54172_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54172_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54197_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54197_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54205_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54205_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54206_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54206_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54224_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54224_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54231_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54231_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54232_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54232_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54369_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54369_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:56:26.57 +59:25:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54379_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54379_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54413_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54413_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54430_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54430_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54450_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54450_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54455_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54455_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54462_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54462_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54472_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54472_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:50.22 +58:25:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54480_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54480_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54501_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 54501_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54517_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54517_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54518_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54518_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54526_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54526_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54578_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54578_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:15:42.83 +59:22:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54591_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54591_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54598_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54598_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54619_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54619_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54625_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54625_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54650_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54650_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54683_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54683_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54685_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54685_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54701_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54701_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54717_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54717_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54723_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 54723_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54732_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54732_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54749_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54749_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54751_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54751_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54774_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 54774_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54778_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54778_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54794_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54794_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54798_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54798_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54806_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54806_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54807_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54807_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54841_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54841_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54845_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54845_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54872_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54872_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54905_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54905_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54913_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54913_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54917_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54917_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54923_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54923_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54925_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54925_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54939_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54939_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54946_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54946_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54951_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54951_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54970_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54970_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:25:32.08 +63:05:51.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54984_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54984_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54985_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 54985_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55004_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55004_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55016_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55016_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55031_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 55031_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55041_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55041_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55042_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55042_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55044_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55044_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55048_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55048_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55050_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 55050_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55052_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55052_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55056_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 55056_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55072_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55072_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55082_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55082_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55091_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55091_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55105_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55105_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55116_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 55116_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55127_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 55127_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55137_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 55137_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55146_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
Preparing report for the candidate 55146_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11017_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141
The candidate 11017_fd_UMa-03-Q1b1x1_2026-06-14_00-33-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0141 did not pass the final checks
