NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-02-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 8000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 4000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 310690 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 310690 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits

renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 521.0909 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.9001 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1391.8402 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 416.0957 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1389.8636 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 390.4719 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.67101 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.066 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-13T23:52:29.4205287' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-14T04:52:29.4205287' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61205.203118287 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-14T04:52:39.3225540' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61205.2032328937 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 128.569598078176 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.999485194695 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.0288888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 330.330555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.54251899149531 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 35.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits :) Spent 0.585096 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 27.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-06-13T23:53:33.1995876' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-06-14T04:53:33.1995876' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61205.2038564701 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-06-14T04:53:43.0994563' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61205.203971053 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 128.569598085629 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9994852460618 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 22.9188888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 330.396666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.55390654011088 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29498 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 29.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 14.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 898.61 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 27.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 35.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits :) Spent 0.531953 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_5C_20s_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 31267.409145 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=21677.0, right_median=21704.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-05-30.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits


fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.70323403 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:32.072 +62:00:58.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30 Second-epoch image center 08:34:32.072 +62:00:58.64 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0342 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Image size: 941.8'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 08:34:29.324 +62:00:29.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 08:34:18.681 +61:59:39.30 Second-epoch image center 08:34:29.324 +62:00:29.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0250 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 08:34:32.072 +62:00:58.64 Second-epoch second image center 08:34:29.324 +62:00:29.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00977 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q3v9JNgU8L Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y3SVaIAHFq Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits &> /tmp/tmp.o7jt5MN3if Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nqIrHhxasj Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5402 deg, Dec +55.4564 to +67.4105 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5402 deg, Dec 55.4564 to 67.4105 deg Loaded 8845 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5406 out of 5707 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5707 out of 9619 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.868250 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.868250 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5402 deg, Dec +55.4564 to +67.4105 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5402 deg, Dec 55.4564 to 67.4105 deg Loaded 8845 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5406 out of 5707 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5707 out of 9619 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.2) Read 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7413 to 148.5398 deg, Dec +55.4564 to +67.4103 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7413 to 148.5398 deg, Dec 55.4564 to 67.4103 deg Loaded 8845 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5389 out of 5703 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 5703 out of 9596 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=6.2) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 2.2 pix wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 14.3 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Q3v9JNgU8L (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, passed=9619 Got 9619 stars (including 8917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 955 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9437 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9436 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 972 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9436 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=972 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=221 n_q2=284 n_q3=180 n_q4=287 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.y3SVaIAHFq (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, passed=9596 Got 9596 stars (including 8884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 960 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9342 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9341 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 975 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9341 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=975 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=215 n_q2=294 n_q3=176 n_q4=290 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.o7jt5MN3if (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=182, passed=3042 Got 3042 stars (including 2855 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3042 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2904 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=455 n_q2=215 n_q3=254 n_q4=40 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.348 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.nqIrHhxasj (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=145, passed=2535 Got 2535 stars (including 2388 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2535 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2431 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2434 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 964 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2434 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits N_match=964 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.501 n_q1=471 n_q2=186 n_q3=263 n_q4=44 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.416 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.307 ref2=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.371 new1=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.348 new2=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits sigma_overall=0.354 worst_q_ratio=1.416 reference average sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.339 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (972 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (975 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097_astrometric_residuals.png (964 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20539_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 The candidate 20539_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 06 14.20397    2461205.70397    10.89    08:41:57.65 +62:01:08.9   4264 3150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits **** FOUND 08:41:57.70 +62:01:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Last image: 2461205.70323403 14.06.2026 04:52:29.420 UTC ERROR running VaST on the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt) ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc90==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees! opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 3.500000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1198.0 1171.0 1200.0 1173.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1329.0 615.0 1331.0 617.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 43 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Setting the fixed star match radius of 3.50 pix We have 4 images to process. SExtractor catalog cache: restored UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits catalog from cache SExtractor catalog cache: restored UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits catalog from cache The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24. Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads... Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1198.0 1171.0 1200.0 1173.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1329.0 615.0 1331.0 617.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 43 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size Waiting for thread 3 to finish... sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1198.0 1171.0 1200.0 1173.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1329.0 615.0 1331.0 617.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 43 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.4,4.4,4.0,4.9,5.3,5.8 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 4.5,4.5,4.0,4.9,5.4,5.8 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits Waiting for thread 2 to finish... Waiting for thread 1 to finish... Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T07:17:21.7607716 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T07:17:21.7607716 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-02-11T07:17:21.760 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits Exposure 20 sec, 11.02.2026 07:17:21.760 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461082.80383981 mid. exp. The reference image star 4000.952 1321.965 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 3618.959 1436.178 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 1545.054 5513.608 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 5377.018 4998.001 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 6000.039 4876.966 is rejected, see bad_region.lst SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 56232, (56231 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 21 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 5 * rejected close to frame edge: 309 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 94 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.26 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3 (5.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.5 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.8 Selected detection limit= -7.8 Final detection limit= -7.8 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.8 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 77 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 56241 * detected, using 500/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001743, number_of_ambiguous_matches=98 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001760, number_of_ambiguous_matches=99 52149 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001760, number_of_ambiguous_matches=99 52149 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001760, number_of_ambiguous_matches=99 52149 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 0.010 56241 stars detected, 52149 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 49226, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 49226 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 49226 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00276 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 46866 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.26 60324 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 138476 kB used, 153420 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-14T04:52:29.4205287 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-14T04:52:29.4205287 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-06-14T04:52:29.420 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-52-29_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0096.fits The star 1157.985 136.278 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8498.010 872.020 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 191.303 1039.463 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 883.998 1377.020 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8274.412 1397.919 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 3619.005 1437.009 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 227.127 1549.026 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 6736.123 1626.993 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 2635.977 2107.991 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 1893.130 2203.118 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 22066 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 6 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 26 * rejected close to frame edge: 108 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.5 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 19 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 22066 * detected, using 196/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000133, number_of_ambiguous_matches=8 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000133, number_of_ambiguous_matches=8 21355 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000133, number_of_ambiguous_matches=8 21353 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000133, number_of_ambiguous_matches=8 21353 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 2.146 22066 stars detected, 21353 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 19648, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 19648 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 17270 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00014*X_pix +0.00012*Y_pix -0.72592 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 17270 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.42  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  60324 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) memory: 141956 kB used, 153420 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-14T04:53:33.1995876 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-06-14T04:53:33.1995876 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-06-14T04:53:33.199 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_235524_TTUQ1b1x1_4057431_LcWR8X12/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_23-53-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0097.fits The star 8498.008 871.979 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 6864.003 1183.961 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 884.249 1377.058 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8275.101 1397.988 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 3619.024 1437.201 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 2636.020 2108.023 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 4923.001 2428.029 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 725.003 2731.967 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 3303.974 3305.328 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8449.889 6167.119 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 19082 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 18 * rejected close to frame edge: 107 * rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>4.4 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 16 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 19082 * detected, using 169/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000083, number_of_ambiguous_matches=5 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000050, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3 18521 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000050, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3 18522 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000050, number_of_ambiguous_matches=3 18522 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 2.150 19082 stars detected, 18522 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 16964, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 16964 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 13704 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00013*X_pix +0.00012*Y_pix -0.63247 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 13704 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.39  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  60324 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) memory: 141956 kB used, 153420 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 112473 (112473 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 9104 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 15212 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 8234 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6311 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 13288 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 51860 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. Variability index idx00_STD is enabled Variability index idx01_wSTD is enabled Variability index idx08_Npts is enabled Variability index idx09_MAD is enabled Variability index idx11_RoMS is enabled Variability index idx12_rCh2 is enabled Variability index idx17_Jtim is enabled Variability index idx18_Ltim is enabled Variability index idx21_eta is enabled Variability index idx23_S_B is enabled Variability index idx25_IQR is enabled Computing the expected values of variability indexes and their scatter as a function of magnitude .......... .......... .......... .......... Wriring the list of candidate variables to vast_autocandidates.log ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ########### Completed UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461205.70323403 -observatory V36 07:15:19.35 +23:34:51.0 Mercury (0.5mag) 08:12:42.66 +22:01:33.6 Venus (-4.0mag) 03:07:07.25 +17:01:13.6 Mars (1.3mag) 07:53:30.41 +21:18:25.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:51:00.04 +02:57:25.3 Saturn (0.8mag) 04:01:37.34 +20:29:30.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:16:27.66 +00:18:32.3 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:59.83 -23:06:52.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 04:27:29.57 +25:58:07.8 Moon (-8.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 361 Jun 13 23:57 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461205.70323403: 07:53:35.74 +21:18:08.0 Io (6.0mag) 07:53:21.99 +21:18:52.0 Europa (6.2mag) 07:53:24.28 +21:18:40.7 Ganymede (5.6mag) 07:53:02.08 +21:19:53.3 Callisto (6.8mag) 07:53:26.21 +20:55:20.2 Himalia (15.6mag) 07:53:34.44 +21:18:13.1 Thebe (16.5mag) 07:53:15.65 +21:08:12.1 Elara (17.6mag) 07:55:59.20 +21:26:50.5 Pasiphae (17.7mag) 07:59:49.25 +21:20:36.8 Carme (18.9mag) 00:51:11.75 +02:57:13.7 Titan (8.6mag) 00:50:59.42 +02:57:17.5 Rhea (9.9mag) 00:51:26.07 +02:59:57.2 Iapetus (11.3mag) 00:51:14.63 +02:57:07.4 Hyperion (14.6mag) 00:51:34.86 +02:58:29.6 Phoebe (16.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Jun 13 23:57 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461205.70323403: 17:28:06.69 -35:35:48.1 JWST 17:17:22.31 +43:13:28.5 Chandra 19:00:06.93 -11:21:20.3 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Jun 13 23:57 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461205.70323403 -observatory V36 18:39:09.49 -33:04:34.9 13.6mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 05:59:25.16 -68:00:53.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:51:16.85 +32:02:53.8 17.5mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:12:19.84 +15:37:15.6 17.8mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 22:10:42.16 -44:54:46.1 16.4mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 23:11:06.42 +31:48:28.4 17.2mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 05:41:23.40 +27:00:08.9 16.5mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:34:09.18 +30:51:56.0 16.7mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:53:50.70 +04:12:11.0 17.7mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:24:16.01 +21:41:09.1 17.8mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:17:19.27 -11:01:41.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 22:11:56.86 +66:52:35.5 17.8mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 17:31:26.47 -07:17:32.8 13.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 13:16:35.45 +81:36:12.4 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 07:18:57.45 +64:31:18.3 17.7mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 06:56:17.09 +28:20:35.9 13.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:32:41.25 +14:00:59.7 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:08:41.75 +32:53:47.5 13.9mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 04:24:02.79 -15:26:45.5 16.0mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 06:11:29.45 +33:27:18.1 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:32:46.69 +52:23:26.7 17.6mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 06:51:48.52 -11:09:05.5 14.7mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 09:29:16.88 +23:14:39.2 17.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 12:39:44.84 +04:38:53.2 17.2mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 18:02:06.65 +76:20:49.7 17.8mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 02:10:47.36 +43:49:34.7 16.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:12:50.72 -01:44:03.1 16.6mag A/2026 E1 20:34:29.99 -09:06:54.6 8.4mag 10P/Tempel 11:03:33.37 -01:04:10.8 16.0mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 03:20:59.79 +26:26:12.7 17.7mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 09:12:47.75 +22:01:52.9 16.9mag 63P/Wild 00:31:54.40 -06:00:19.9 15.6mag 65P/Gunn 07:02:57.81 +33:56:54.2 17.1mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 03:23:44.60 +17:56:53.2 13.8mag 78P/Gehrels 01:33:33.09 +06:06:57.7 15.7mag 88P/Howell 05:13:58.27 +30:40:42.3 15.3mag 93P/Lovas 03:00:12.37 +28:32:37.1 17.5mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 07:04:57.26 +32:46:53.9 15.5mag 123P/West-Hartley 10:00:42.22 +12:04:26.3 16.6mag 124P/Mrkos 04:08:57.32 +19:37:59.2 16.3mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 04:45:29.58 +19:19:53.4 17.8mag 131P/Mueller 06:23:21.86 +17:53:21.2 15.4mag 141P/Machholz 06:26:22.97 +17:52:49.0 15.4mag 141P-A/Machholz 05:23:49.13 +16:51:48.1 12.2mag 141P-D/Machholz 03:01:50.31 -23:53:41.3 16.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 04:01:31.34 +26:08:10.5 15.0mag 162P/SidingSpring 19:35:28.27 +03:35:28.0 16.5mag 169P/NEAT 00:34:25.92 +03:36:43.3 17.8mag 220P/McNaught 16:47:45.34 -08:14:03.5 16.5mag 235P/LINEAR 07:48:11.67 +35:12:35.5 17.6mag 240P/NEAT 00:48:11.65 +00:07:23.1 16.2mag 260P/McNaught 04:20:45.90 +33:31:45.7 17.5mag 295P/LINEAR 00:26:51.16 -02:37:23.0 17.7mag 320P/McNaught 15:12:42.09 +07:51:30.3 17.5mag 391P/Kowalski 08:11:59.90 +20:35:01.9 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS 07:09:46.16 +41:15:45.9 17.8mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Jun 13 23:57 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21 14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89 12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5 13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23 09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51 15:03:05.18 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.94 10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52 22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2 21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51 16:21:48.82 -61:36:13.20 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.21 15.15 14:26:40.22 -24:48:37.50 AT2026lig 2026-05-4.27 14.63 13:17:51.04 +30:25:13.50 SN2026kcp 2026-05-4.46 16.43 11:27:55.57 -13:38:56.90 SN2026kza 2026-05-1.08 15.59 22:28:27.10 +30:17:54.30 SN 2026fov 2026-04-29.6 14.36 21:00:10.71 -32:17:03.90 AT2026kis 2026-04-27.36 16.15 14:32:57.37 -58:13:26.40 ASASSN-26dc 2026-04-27.27 13.42 15:32:05.35 -43:54:34.60 ASASSN-26db 2026-04-27.37 16.06 16:34:34.94 -54:34:58.20 ASASSN-26da 2026-04-25.14 15.99 10:06:55.04 -01:13:49.70 SN2026jsg 2026-04-24.99 16.28 15:15:57.17 +56:18:32.80 SN2026kid 2026-04-24.52 -3.65 07:58:28.45 +57:03:42.40 AT2026kcf 2026-04-24.2 16.89 11:38:21.80 -50:43:06.50 SN2026jkb 2026-04-24.24 15.38 10:06:11.41 -39:41:04.20 AT2026dil 2026-04-24.2 16.85 14:21:40.08 +13:13:46.30 SN2026jlm 2026-04-22.16 15.12 10:53:55.42 -16:06:08.10 ASASSN-26cz 2026-04-22.12 16.24 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 2026-06-11 17.05 13:45:02.03 +15:17:14.50 ASASSN-26cy 2026-04-21.27 15.78 13:20:52.22 -35:57:03.60 AT2026jcm 2026-04-19.01 16.65 13:36:15.66 -36:53:48.40 SN 2026iqy 2026-04-18.92 17.31 06:34:01.33 -40:07:34.00 ASASSN-26cx 2026-04-19.07 16.16 23:33:57.97 -45:12:11.90 SN 2026idu 2026-04-19.41 15.9 12:10:50.92 +66:55:31.20 SN 2026icv 2026-04-17.14 16.03 21:36:59.06 -60:43:35.90 ASASSN-26cv 2026-04-17.35 -1.18 08:13:26.26 -27:07:30.50 ASASSN-26cw 2026-04-17.07 -1.01 14:49:14.13 -27:29:20.60 ASASSN-26cu 2026-04-16.06 14.03 17:21:59.44 -38:54:04.60 ASASSN-26ct 2026-04-14.4 15.15 15:25:54.99 +07:49:24.50 SN2026huo 2026-04-12.14 16.96 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 2026-06-11 17.05 12:23:20.40 +04:53:39.10 AT2026ixd 2026-04-12.14 17.65 17:46:09.76 -61:19:50.40 SN2026icy 2026-04-12.2 17.03 09:25:46.42 +02:13:46.30 SN2026gud 2026-04-11.98 16.49 16:52:15.46 -60:27:45.90 ASASSN-26cs 2026-04-12.4 15.5 04:20:55.37 -51:15:31.10 ASASSN-26cr 2026-04-12.01 15.37 22:25:39.35 +36:45:06.90 AT2026ihl 2026-04-10.48 14.21 19:40:44.94 +00:41:03.80 AT2026imw 2026-04-10.32 16.06 19:52:04.70 +05:53:33.50 ASASSN-26cq 2026-04-9.31 14.98 16:08:18.39 -64:11:08.80 ASASSN-26cp 2026-04-9.14 13.64 09:22:22.90 -61:02:43.70 SN2026idh 2026-04-7.97 16.34 05:06:54.12 -19:42:26.40 AT2026imr 2026-04-8 17.49 07:14:55.34 -36:03:21.40 AT2026hei 2026-04-8.12 16.7 21:35:33.14 -19:01:34.80 AT2026ihm 2026-04-8.36 16.7 04:28:24.08 -32:25:35.30 AT2026imo 2026-04-8.02 16.81 05:10:35.79 -39:38:40.80 SN 2026hnn 2026-04-7.04 17.07 09:54:32.04 -01:17:25.80 ASASSN-26cn 2026-04-7.01 15.58 07:46:24.43 -77:29:36.30 ASASSN-26co 2026-04-7.15 15.11 05:00:45.52 -29:51:06.20 AT2026hvw 2026-04-6.03 16.51 19:49:33.10 -23:37:11.00 ASASSN-26cl 2026-04-5.29 14.98 19:32:43.68 -22:39:32.70 ASASSN-26cm 2026-04-4.27 13.88 18:08:57.38 +76:48:23.60 ASASSN-26ck 2026-04-2.37 15.38 16:16:36.10 +44:52:30.20 AT2026hyy 2026-04-2.58 13.81 21:55:23.31 -34:48:53.90 ASASSN-26cj 2026-03-30.4 -1.47 11:19:50.70 -27:51:49.80 SN2026gvk 2026-03-30 15.48 11:53:57.02 -23:09:46.20 SN2026gzx 2026-03-28.75 15.27 07:13:46.14 -33:10:15.70 ASASSN-26ci 2026-03-28.15 15.14 09:03:36.09 -67:58:13.00 SN2026hkg 2026-03-28.19 15.82 07:03:00.72 +39:14:43.00 SN2026fin 2026-03-28.27 15.82 05:35:42.80 -63:44:05.50 ASASSN-26ch 2026-03-27.86 13.02 11:23:19.04 +34:22:38.00 SN2026fwt 2026-03-27.3 16.56 19:03:49.79 +37:04:05.20 ASASSN-26ce 2026-03-26.56 16.3 20:26:56.07 -52:54:06.50 AT2026hiy 2026-03-26.35 16.95 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.6K Jun 13 23:57 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 09:55:38.83 +69:05:21.7 PNV J09553883+6905217 2026-04-01.893 19.4mag 19:32:43.67 -22:39:30.7 TCP J19324367-2239307 2026-04-05.4395 13.6mag 16:16:36.03 +44:52:28.9 TCP J16163603+4452289 2026-04-05.6655 14.2mag 00:43:38.36 +41:15:32.4 PNV J00433836+4115324 2026-04-08.079 17.2mag 15:41:11.68 +59:18:26.8 TCP J15411168+5918268 2026-04-12.9625 19.2mag 00:43:35.02 +41:46:28.0 PNV J00433502+4146280 2026-04-23.056 15.9mag 00:42:55.64 +41:14:12.2 PNV J00425564+4114122 2026-04-24.042 16.2mag 21:14:03.38 +56:46:44.1 TCP J21140338+5646441 2026-05-05.3534 16.7mag 15:03:05.19 +22:02:04.1 TCP J15030519+2202041 2026-05-08.3260 13.9mag 07:15:18.25 +47:53:16.7 TCP J07151825+4753167 2026-05-09.1599 14.4mag 16:00:18.44 -22:30:10.6 TCP J16001844-2230106 2026-05-09.6135 13.3mag 00:42:47.45 +41:16:58.5 PNV J00424745+4116585 2026-05-10.030 16.8mag 09:55:02.89 +69:02:13.8 PNV J09550289+6902138 2026-05-18.925 20.7mag 00:43:01.82 +41:18:16.6 PNV J00430182+4118166 2026-05-21.8651 18.83Cmag 00:42:51.20 +41:16:59.4 PNV J00425120+4116594 2022-10-26.135 19.3mag 12:24:25.10 +28:47:12.0 TCP J12242510+2847120 2026-05-31.6015 14.8mag 00:56:07.13 +43:01:40.6 TCP J00560713+4301406 2026-06-01.4135 12.2mag 00:42:41.64 +41:15:16.2 PNV J00424164+4115162 2026-06-02.029 17.4mag 00:42:38.68 +41:15:58.2 PNV J00423868+4115582 2026-06-05.1224 19.97Umag 19:00:42.95 -48:31:01.7 PNV J19004295-4831017 2026-05-25.0752 14.2mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 189K Jun 13 23:57 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 15:25:24.694 +28:06:12.15 AT 2026oke 2026-06-06.78 19.63 16:00:35.665 +40:33:28.48 AT 2026okd 2026-06-06.92 19.53 14:23:47.456 +75:46:01.44 AT 2026okc 2026-06-06.35 19.202 09:06:15.590 -05:53:46.80 AT 2026okb 2026-06-05.71 19.229 00:23:52.320 +36:21:31.09 AT 2026oka 2026-06-06.19 19.004 11:27:24.917 -04:39:24.73 AT 2026ojz 2026-06-05.80 19.208 08:40:07.303 -16:41:42.39 AT 2026ojy 2026-06-05.73 18.788 09:41:38.510 -12:30:07.46 AT 2026ojx 2026-06-04.26 19.393 14:21:14.441 +56:50:47.63 AT 2026ojw 2026-06-06.37 19.475 09:10:24.455 -13:57:44.58 AT 2026ojv 2026-06-05.73 19.004 10:12:37.525 +13:13:10.28 AT 2026oju 2026-06-05.26 19.164 13:19:00.470 +43:14:24.76 AT 2026ojt 2026-06-06.33 18.85 18:43:15.260 -08:47:37.40 AT 2026ojs 2026-06-06.73 17.82 00:35:11.496 -00:49:17.94 AT 2026ojr 2026-06-01.47 19.0273 13:27:16.739 -38:01:33.63 AT 2026ojq 2026-06-06.42 19.89 02:13:54.662 +31:51:42.05 AT 2026ojp 2026-05-31.48 18.5771 12:22:54.475 -14:25:27.09 AT 2026ojo 2026-06-06.37 20.1 12:12:13.424 -28:02:18.53 AT 2026ojn 2026-06-06.36 19.27 12:01:26.980 -21:29:06.86 AT 2026ojm 2026-06-06.37 19.41 10:54:17.334 -30:22:38.44 AT 2026ojl 2026-06-06.35 18.98 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 30K Jun 13 23:57 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 93 C