This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1563 2461205.6563 9.90 15:59:21.64 -29:51:11.4
344.58703 17.43592 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 5.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.29 Amphitrite 0 -0 0 9.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:21.64 -29:51:11.4: 13.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:21.64 -29:51:11.4: 13.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6563,9.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1563 9.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 06 14.1563 2461205.6563 13.21 16:02:53.40 -30:16:44.6
344.86331 16.60244 galactic Lup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.195 Eurykleia -1 0 1 13.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:02:53.40 -30:16:44.6: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:02:53.40 -30:16:44.6: 14.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin Lite
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461205.6563,13.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260614.1563 13.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461205.65658918 14.06.2026 03:45:19.305 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5266
Objects passed selection criteria: 5261
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5241
Average stars matched: 5178.25 (98.8027 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 13 22:56:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
First image: 2461146.81684877 16.04.2026 07:36:05.734 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Last image: 2461205.65658918 14.06.2026 03:45:19.305 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 53
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 22 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 47063
Objects passed selection criteria: 47019
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45550.8
Average stars matched: 44952 (98.6855 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 156524 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Jun 10 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-96-gc6da043e
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-06-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Jun 13 22:59:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461205.65598796
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits'
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits'
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:12.128 -34:01:41.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:12.128 -34:01:41.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:12.141 -34:01:10.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:12.141 -34:01:10.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0331 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:12.128 -34:01:41.54
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:12.141 -34:01:10.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00849 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0httdL1pu2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V4tPCu0zVS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fOz2ec2bct
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V6FnjLWNRi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.637500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.637500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.16
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.4099 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4422 to -28.0332 deg
Loaded 10950 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5601 out of 5758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 7114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.8428 to 244.7163 deg, Dec -39.2748 to -28.4901 deg
Loaded 10256 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4327 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 5203 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.5 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
3.5 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
3.6 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
2.3 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.5 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.7 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0httdL1pu2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7114
Got 7114 stars (including 6567 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 948 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 960 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7015 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 959 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7014 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=959 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=257 n_q2=216 n_q3=212 n_q4=274 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.V4tPCu0zVS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh: line 136: echo: write error: Broken pipe
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=287, passed=5203
Got 5203 stars (including 4912 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5203 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 943 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5104 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.576 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.897 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.543 n_q1=245 n_q2=214 n_q3=201 n_q4=298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.558
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fOz2ec2bct (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=269, passed=4415
Got 4415 stars (including 4144 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 945 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4327 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits N_match=945 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=241 n_q2=219 n_q3=185 n_q4=300 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.371
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.V6FnjLWNRi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=233, passed=4361
Got 4361 stars (including 4127 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 939 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4275 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 955 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4276 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits N_match=955 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.698 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.388 n_q1=251 n_q2=224 n_q3=186 n_q4=294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.445
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits sigma_overall=0.450 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits sigma_overall=0.576 worst_q_ratio=1.558
new1=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits sigma_overall=0.478 worst_q_ratio=1.371
new2=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits sigma_overall=0.483 worst_q_ratio=1.445
reference average sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.3235
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239_astrometric_residuals.png (959 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001_astrometric_residuals.png (958 matched stars from wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.54 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030_astrometric_residuals.png (945 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031_astrometric_residuals.png (955 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:59:21.64 -29:51:11.4: 13.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:59:21.64 -29:51:11.4: 13.10 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:59:21.64 -29:51:11.4: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=9.9032 delta=3.27 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20243.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20243_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 20243_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20245_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 20245_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:47.62 -36:13:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20246_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 20246_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:51.25 -35:44:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02919_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 02919_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:40:11.07 -35:15:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20118_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 20118_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:28.82 -36:17:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 03630_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:35.32 -33:50:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:59:21.64 -29:51:11.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.5' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:12.128 -34:01:41.54 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:12.128 -34:01:41.54
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0396 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Image size: 940.9'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:39:12.141 -34:01:10.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:39:05.481 -33:59:45.44
Second-epoch image center 15:39:12.141 -34:01:10.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0331 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:39:12.128 -34:01:41.54
Second-epoch second image center 15:39:12.141 -34:01:10.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00849 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yfuwfvRlvW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R4y3nsLUvn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xbu0jsehDE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kHzz6ATm8Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits and wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.13
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 70289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.3696 to 244.4457 deg, Dec -39.4764 to -27.9540 deg
Loaded 11081 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7807 out of 8626 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8626 out of 70289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 224.7645 to 244.7886 deg, Dec -39.2834 to -28.4769 deg
Loaded 10340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8144 out of 8674 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8674 out of 47285 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 8000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
3.1 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
3.1 pix fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
2.1 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
2.4 pix wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.3 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
13.8 mag. Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.yfuwfvRlvW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3491, passed=70279
Got 70279 stars (including 66700 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 70279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 312 (Dec -39.5 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 958 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69314 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits N_match=958 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=260 n_q2=227 n_q3=215 n_q4=256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.R4y3nsLUvn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits' -> 'wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1840, passed=47285
Got 47285 stars (including 45378 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47285 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 253 to 309 (Dec -39.3 to -28.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 957 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46474 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits N_match=957 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.765 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.547 n_q1=248 n_q2=217 n_q3=187 n_q4=305 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.330
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits -region wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xbu0jsehDE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1305, passed=33297
Got 33297 stars (including 31955 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 931 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32871 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 947 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32869 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits N_match=947 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.614 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=213 n_q2=210 n_q3=204 n_q4=320 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.333
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kHzz6ATm8Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1250, passed=32771
Got 32771 stars (including 31483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 937 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32319 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 252 to 311 (Dec -39.4 to -28.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 954 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits N_match=954 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.384 n_q1=225 n_q2=213 n_q3=200 n_q4=316 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.338
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits -region wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-44-27_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0030.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-06-13_CI_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_225325_TTUQ1b1x1_2435093_P5aWHjgG/wcs_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lup-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:07:38.16 -29:27:47.8: 12.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:14:27.00 -39:08:54.8: 12.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:52:03.09 -32:42:28.5: 13.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:11:42.67 -38:03:08.4: 12.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:14:27.00 -39:08:54.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:27.00 -39:08:54.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:48:26.98 -32:04:48.5: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:10:45.28 -29:44:57.4: 12.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:07:38.16 -29:27:47.8: 12.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:11:42.67 -38:03:08.4: 12.50 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:52:03.09 -32:42:28.5: 13.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:38.16 -29:27:47.8: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2969 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:11:42.67 -38:03:08.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.0894 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:03.09 -32:42:28.5: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.9106 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:10:45.28 -29:44:57.4: 12.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:48:26.98 -32:04:48.5: 12.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:45.28 -29:44:57.4: ref_mag=12.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7144 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:26.98 -32:04:48.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7278 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 16:02:53.40 -30:16:44.6: 14.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:32:39.57 -29:18:56.2: 13.85 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:48:08.26 -32:07:53.7: 13.75 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 16:02:53.40 -30:16:44.6: 14.40 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:32:39.57 -29:18:56.2: 14.15 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:32:39.57 -29:18:56.2: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4310 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:48:08.26 -32:07:53.7: 13.55 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:08.26 -32:07:53.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.4064 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_02-36-05_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0239.fits at 15:34:57.91 -35:12:16.8: 13.66 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-19_00-35-19_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0001.fits at 15:34:57.91 -35:12:16.8: 13.70 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:34:57.91 -35:12:16.8: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.7257 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out26858.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82471.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82325_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82325_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82332_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82332_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:43:39.52 -29:09:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82334_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82334_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82345_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82345_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82383_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82383_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:21.62 -29:51:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82403_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82403_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82414_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82414_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:38.45 -31:59:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82419_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82419_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:30:44.34 -38:20:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82425_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82425_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:12:04.70 -31:37:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82428_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82428_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:36.88 -29:50:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82430_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82430_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82432_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82432_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82435_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82435_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:41:33.45 -29:12:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82439_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82439_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:16:07.59 -30:43:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82442_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82442_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:17:02.58 -38:00:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82447_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82447_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:02:58.57 -35:51:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82448_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82448_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:59.85 -30:58:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82449_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82449_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:29:25.97 -28:51:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82450_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82450_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:55.27 -39:08:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82461_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82461_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:07.71 -29:37:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82464_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82464_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:06.84 -31:35:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82466_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82466_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:58.56 -37:26:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82471_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
Preparing report for the candidate 82471_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82472_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82472_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:38.94 -29:10:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82475_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82475_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:26.76 -37:33:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82476_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82476_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:25.41 -33:38:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82482_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82482_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:54:21.10 -36:56:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82490_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82490_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:47:28.76 -32:25:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82497_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82497_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:57:19.10 -34:25:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82510_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82510_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82513_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 82513_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01508_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 01508_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:39:51.32 -39:04:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80886_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 80886_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:51.15 -35:44:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 19295_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:25:47.64 -36:13:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81338_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 81338_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:01:10.25 -36:01:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03142_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 03142_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:33:17.06 -38:42:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 35279_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:36:35.32 -33:50:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25975_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 25975_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:13:13.37 -34:51:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26709_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 26709_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:40:11.41 -35:15:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81396_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 81396_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:38.13 -29:15:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81335_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 81335_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:26.65 -38:06:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40796_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 40796_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:22.71 -33:19:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19068_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 19068_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:18:04.41 -36:03:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26858_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 26858_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:34:57.91 -35:12:16.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.443 6014031121619490176 233.74197030376 -35.20427538020 11.3760 9.9243 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.443#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21823_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 21823_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:40.55 -36:01:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031
The candidate 58877_fd_Lup-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-13_22-45-19_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0031 did not pass the final checks